The present invention relates generally to the drilling of oil and/or gas wells, and more specifically, to a formation fluid sampling tool and method of use for acquiring and preserving substantially pristine formation fluid samples.
The commercial development of hydrocarbon (e.g., oil and natural gas) fields requires significant capital investment. Thus it is generally desirable to have as much information as possible pertaining to the contents of a hydrocarbon reservoir and/or geological formation in order to determine its commercial viability. There have been significant advances in measurement while drilling and logging while drilling technology in recent years (hereafter referred to as MWD and LWD, respectively). These advances have improved the quality of data received from downhole sensors regarding subsurface formations. It is nonetheless still desirable to obtain one or more formation fluid samples during the drilling and completion of an oil and/or gas well. Once retrieved at the surface, these samples typically undergo specialized chemical and physical analysis to determine the type and quality of the hydrocarbons contained therein. In general, it is desirable to collect the samples as early as possible in the life of the well to minimize contamination of the native hydrocarbons by drilling damage.
As is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art, formation fluids (e.g., water, oil, and gas) are found in geological formations at relatively high temperatures and pressures (as compared to ambient conditions at the surface). At these relatively high temperatures and pressures, the formation fluid is typically a single-phase fluid, with the gaseous components being dissolved in the liquid. A reduction in pressure (such as may occur by exposing the formation fluid to ambient conditions at the surface) typically results in the separation of the gaseous and liquid components. Cooling of the formation fluid towards such ambient temperatures typically results in a reduction in volume (and therefore a reduction in pressure if the fluid is housed in a sealed container), which also tends to result in a separation of the gaseous and liquid components. Cooling of the formation fluid may also result in substantially irreversible precipitation and/or separation of other compounds previously dissolved therein. Thus it is generally desirable for a sampling apparatus to be capable of substantially preserving the temperature and/or pressure of the formation fluid in its pristine formation condition.
Berger et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,803,186, disclose an apparatus and method for obtaining samples of formation fluid using a work string designed for performing other downhole work such as drilling, workover operations, or re-entry operations. The apparatus includes sensors for sensing downhole conditions while using a work string that permits working fluid properties to be adjusted without withdrawing the work string from the well bore. The apparatus also includes a relatively small integral sample chamber coupled to multiple input and output valves for collecting and housing a formation fluid sample.
Schultz et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 6,236,620, disclose an apparatus and method for drilling, logging, and testing a subsurface formation without removing the drill string from the well bore. The apparatus includes a surge chamber and surge chamber receptacle for use in sampling formation fluids. The surge chamber is lowered through the drill string into engagement with the surge chamber receptacle, receives a sample of formation fluid, and then is retrieved to the surface. Repeated sampling may be accomplished without removing the drill string by removing the surge chamber, evacuating it, and then lowering it back into the well. While the Berger and Schultz apparatuses apparently permit samples to be collected relatively early in the life of a well, without retrieval of the drill string, they include no capability of preserving the temperature and/or pressure of the formation fluid. Further, it is a relatively complex operation to remove the formation fluid sample from the Berger apparatus.
Michaels et al., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,303,775 and 5,377,755, disclose a Method and Apparatus for Acquiring and Processing Subsurface Samples of Connate Fluid in which one or more fluid sample tanks are pressure balanced with respect to the well bore at formation level (hydrostatic pressure). The sample tank(s) are filled with a connate fluid sample in such a manner that during filling thereof the pressure of the connate fluid is apparently maintained within a predetermined range above the bubble point of the fluid. Massie et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,337,822, disclose a Well Fluid Sampling Tool for retrieving single-phase hydrocarbon samples from deep wells in which a sample is pressurized by a hydraulically driven floating piston powered by high-pressure gas acting on another floating piston. One drawback of the Michaels and Massie apparatuses is that they require prior withdrawal of the drill string before they can be lowered into the well bore, which typically involves significant cost and time, and increases the risk of subsurface damage to the formation of interest.
Therefore, there exists a need for improved apparatuses and methods for obtaining samples of formation fluid from a well. In particular, there exists a need for an apparatus that does not require retrieval of the drill string from the well and that has the capability of preserving the sample of formation fluid in substantially pristine condition.
In one aspect this invention includes a formation fluid sampling tool. The tool includes at least one sample tank mounted in a tool collar, the tool collar including a through bore and disposed to be operatively coupled with a drill string such that each sample tank may receive a correspondingly preselected formation fluid sample without removing the drill string from a well bore. At least one of the sample tanks further includes an internal fluid separator movably disposed therein. The separator separates a sample chamber from a pressure balancing chamber in the sample tank. The pressure balancing chamber is disposed to be in fluid communication with drilling fluid exterior thereto. The sampling tool further includes a sample inlet port connected to the sample chamber by an inlet passageway. Certain other embodiments may further include a heating module in thermal communication with the sample chamber for controlling the temperature of a fluid sample.
In another aspect, this invention includes a logging while drilling tool including the sampling tool substantially according to the preceding paragraph and further including at least one packer assembly for sealing the wall of the well bore around the tool and a fluid identification module including at least one sensor disposed to sense a physical property of a formation fluid.
In still another aspect this invention includes a method for acquiring a formation fluid sample from a formation of interest. The method includes providing a formation fluid sampling tool as described substantially according to the preceding paragraphs, coupling the sampling tool with a drill string, positioning the sampling tool adjacent a formation of interest, and pumping formation fluid into the sample chamber.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter, which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should be also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention addresses difficulties in acquiring and preserving samples of pristine formation fluid, including those difficulties described above. This invention includes a sampling tool for obtaining samples of relatively pristine formation fluid without removing the drill string from the well bore. Sampling tools according to this invention may retrieve samples from any depth, including both deep and shallow wells. Embodiments of the sampling tool of this invention are configured for coupling to a drill string and include a through bore, allowing drilling fluid (such as drilling mud) to flow therethrough. Embodiments of the tool include one or more sample tanks, each of which advantageously includes a movable internal fluid separator disposed therein which divides the tank into a sample chamber and a pressure balancing chamber. In one embodiment, the pressure balancing chamber may be in fluid communication with the through bore and thus pressure balanced with the drilling fluid. In other embodiments, the pressure of the drilling fluid may be controlled by arrangements that restrict the flow of mud through the tool. Embodiments of the sampling tool of this invention also optionally include on-board electronics disposed to control the collection of multiple samples of pristine formation fluid at predetermined instants or intervals of time.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention advantageously provide for improved sampling of formation fluid from, for example, deep wells. In particular, embodiments of this invention are configured to try to maintain, for as long as possible, the fluid at or greater than about the pressure of the formation. Further, samples from one formation may be obtained at different pressures, which may give valuable insight into the effect of various completion procedures. Embodiments of this invention may also be advantageous in that the sample pressure is controllable by controlling surface hydraulics (e.g., drilling fluid pump pressure). Other embodiments of this invention may further advantageously control the sample temperature so as, for example, to maintain the fluid at about the same temperature as found in the formation.
Embodiments of the sampling tool of this invention, in combination with a logging while drilling (LWD) tool or a measurement while drilling (MWD) tool, for example, are couplable to a drill string, and thus in such a configuration provide for sampling of formation fluid shortly after penetration of the formation of interest. Advantages are thus provided for the acquisition and preservation of relatively high quality formation fluid samples in substantially pristine condition. These high quality samples may provide for more accurate determination of formation properties and thus may enable a better assessment of the economic viability of an oil and/or gas reservoir. These and other advantages of this invention will become evident in light of the following discussion of various embodiments thereof.
Referring now to
The closure plug 142 (also referred to as a sample tank plug in the Michaels patents) includes a pressure balancing passage 156, which may be closed by a small closure plug 158 receivable in an internally threaded receptacle 160. While positioned downhole, the closure plug 158 is removed, thereby permitting entry of formation pressure into the pressure balancing chamber 140. As the connate fluid sample is pumped into the sample chamber 138, a slight pressure differential develops across the piston 128 and, because it is free-floating, the piston 128 moves towards the support shoulder 126. When the piston 128 has moved into contact with the support shoulder 126, the sample chamber 138 is assumed to be completely filled.
Referring now to
During a drilling, testing, and sampling operation, drill bit 32 is rotated on drill string 30 to create a well bore 40. Shortly after the drill bit 32 intersects the formation 14 of interest, drilling typically stops to allow formation testing before contamination of the formation occurs, e.g., by invasion of working fluid or filter cake build-up. Expandable packers 320 are inflated to sealing engage the wall of well bore 40. The inflated packers 320 isolate a portion of the well bore 40 adjacent the formation 14 to be tested. Formation fluid is then received at port 316 of formation tester 300 and may be pumped into one or more sample chambers 224 (illustrated on
It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the sampling module 200 and the formation tester 300 of the present invention are not limited to use with semisubmersible platform 12 as illustrated in
Referring now to
With reference now to
Referring now to
Referring again to
As further illustrated on
Drilling fluid pressure control assembly 250 may be advantageous on exemplary embodiments of this invention in that it provides a mechanism for controlling the drilling fluid pressure in the through bore 240, and thus the pressure in pressure balancing chamber 226, which provides for a controllable sample pressure. When the pressure control assembly 250 is closed (e.g., when valves 246 are closed) the pressure of the drilling fluid in the through bore 240 is substantially maximized and tends towards the sum of the hydrostatic pressure and the drilling fluid pump pressure. Controlled release of drilling fluid through the pressure control assembly 250 (e.g., by partially or fully opening one or more of valves 246) controllably reduces the drilling fluid pressure in through bore 240 and thus in pressure balancing chamber 226. It will be appreciated that drilling fluid pressure control assembly 250 is also an optional feature of embodiments of the sampling tool according to this invention. Artisans of ordinary skill will readily recognize that the function of the pressure control assembly 250 may be similarly achieved, at least in part, for example, by controlling the drilling fluid outlet on conventional drill bit jets used on a drill bit assembly.
Valves 236, 242, and 246 as well as other components of the sampling tool are advantageously controllable by an electronic controller 280, shown schematically disposed in tool body 210 on
Referring now to
Referring now to
With further reference to the embodiment of
Referring now to
Referring now to
With continued reference to
Formation tester 300 typically further includes a control module (not shown) of analogous purpose to that described above with respect to controller 280. The control module, for example, controls the function of the various sensors described above and communicates sensor output with operators at the surface, for example, by conventional mud telemetry or electric line communications techniques. The control module may also be further communicably coupleable with controller 280.
In operation, formation tester 300 is positioned adjacent to a formation of interest in the well bore. The packer elements 320 are inflated, thereby isolating a substantially annular portion of the well bore adjacent the formation. One or more pumps 350 are utilized to pump formation fluid into the tool at port 316. The pump 350 may include, for example, a bidirectional piston pump, such as that disclosed in the Michaels patents, or substantially any other suitable pump in view of the service temperatures and pressures, exposure to corrosive formation fluids, and other downhole conditions. Fluid is typically drawn slowly into the tool (rather than flowing by the force of the reservoir pressure) in order to maintain it above its bubble pressure (i.e., the pressure below which a single phase fluid becomes a two phase fluid). Sampled formation fluid is then pumped through the fluid identification module 310 where it is tested using one or more of the various sensors described above. Fluid is typically pumped into module 310 and then discharged from the tool via passageway 312 and output port 313 until it is sensed to have predetermined properties (e.g., a resistivity within a certain range) identifying it as likely to be a substantially pristine formation fluid. Typically, upon first pumping, the formation fluid is contaminated with drilling mud. After some time, however, substantially pristine formation fluid may be drawn into the tool and routed to sampling module 200 via passageway 314. Samples may be obtained using substantially any protocol (e.g., at various time intervals or matching certain predetermined fluid properties measured by identification module 310).
Referring now to
As described briefly above, exemplary embodiments of this invention advantageously allow for the acquisition of multiple formation fluid samples at distinct pressures. For example, a first sample may be acquired at a relatively high pressure by substantially closing valve 242 and pressure control assembly 250 (e.g., such that the passageway 244 between through bore 240 and the well bore is substantially closed. Subsequent samples, for example, may be acquired at relatively lower pressures by partially or fully opening pressure control assembly 250, thereby releasing pressure from the through bore (and pressure balancing chamber 226). Exemplary embodiments of this invention thus advantageously allow formation fluid samples to be collected at a relatively wide range of pressures, ranging from about hydrostatic pressure up to about 5000 psi greater than the hydrostatic pressure of the well bore.
Referring also the exemplary embodiment of
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alternations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1619328 | Benckenstein | Mar 1927 | A |
2978046 | True | Apr 1961 | A |
4406335 | Koot | Sep 1983 | A |
4615399 | Schoeffler | Oct 1986 | A |
4676096 | Bardsley | Jun 1987 | A |
4745802 | Purfurst | May 1988 | A |
4766955 | Petermann | Aug 1988 | A |
4898236 | Sask | Feb 1990 | A |
5101907 | Schultz et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5230244 | Gilbert | Jul 1993 | A |
5303775 | Michaels et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5329811 | Schultz et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337822 | Massie et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5377755 | Michaels et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5518073 | Manke et al. | May 1996 | A |
5540280 | Schultz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549162 | Moody et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555945 | Schultz et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558162 | Manke et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5597016 | Manke et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5649597 | Ringgenberg | Jul 1997 | A |
5687791 | Beck et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5743334 | Nelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5791414 | Skinner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799733 | Ringgenberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5803186 | Berger et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807082 | Skinner et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813460 | Ringgenberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5826662 | Beck et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5901788 | Brown et al. | May 1999 | A |
5901796 | McDonald | May 1999 | A |
5911285 | Stewart et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5979572 | Boyd et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006834 | Skinner | Dec 1999 | A |
6065355 | Schultz | May 2000 | A |
6148914 | Guieze | Nov 2000 | A |
6189612 | Ward | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216782 | Skinner | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236620 | Schultz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6439307 | Reinhardt | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6557632 | Cernosek | May 2003 | B1 |
6609568 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622554 | Manke et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6688390 | Bolze et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702017 | Corrigan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20020060067 | Bolze et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020112854 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129936 | Cernosek | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030085039 | DiFoggio | May 2003 | A1 |
20040231842 | Shammai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050028974 | Moody | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0295922 | Dec 1988 | EP |
WO-0034624 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0133044 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0133045 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0229196 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050028973 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |