The field of this invention is an equalizing pressure feature for subterranean or downhole valves and more particularly a way to equalize trapped lower pressure in a ball or plug of a valve without having to run a tool in the valve.
Downhole valves are used to isolate portions of the wellbore for a variety of reasons such as for safety systems or to allow building a long bottom hole assembly in the wellbore, to name a few examples. Such valves have featured a rotating ball with a bore through it that can be aligned or misaligned with the path through the tubing string where the valve is mounted. The ball is surrounded by a sliding cage that is operated by a hydraulic control system from the surface. One such design that features opposed pistons actuated by discrete control lines is illustrated in US Publication 2009/0184278. This design was concerned about a pressure imbalance on an operating piston and provided a passage through the piston with two check valves 64, 70 in series to allow pressure equalization across the actuating piston with the ball in the closed position.
What can happen in this type of a ball valve that has upper and lower seats against the ball in the closed position is that pressure from downhole can rise, which leads to a pressure differential between the passage inside the ball and the downhole pressure. This pressure differential can distort the ball and make it hard or impossible for the piston actuation system to operate the ball back into the open position. One way this was solved is described in a commonly assigned application Ser. No. 12/366,752 filed on Feb. 6, 2009 and having the title Pressure Equalization Device for Downhole Tools. The solution described in this application was to use a tool that goes into the upper sleeve that hold a seat against the ball and separate the seat from the ball while providing pressure from the surface at the same time to equalize the pressure on the ball before trying to rotate it to the open position. The problem with this technique was that it required a run into the well with coiled tubing, latching and shifting the upper sleeve and associated seat enough to give access into the ball for equalizing pressure. One of the downsides of this technique was that the pressure admitted to try to equalize the pressure in the ball could be high enough to unseat the lower seat from the ball so that the higher pressure below the ball would get to above the ball. This technique also took time which cost the operator money and required specialized equipment at the well location, which could be remote or offshore and add yet additional costs to the effort to operate the ball when subjected to high differential pressures that increases opening friction or could distort the ball enough to make it hard for the hydraulic system to rotate it.
In flapper type safety valves such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,564,502 the preferred method to get pressure equalization on a closed flapper was to simply apply tubing pressure on top of it to reduce the differential before using the control system to try to rotate the flapper. Of course, the flapper is built to rotate open with pressure applied above so that this technique did not equalize pressure around the flapper when it was closed but simply built up pressure above it when it was closed. Other equalizer valves mounted in the flapper were actuated by the hydraulic system moving down a flow tube that impacted the equalizing valve before the flapper was engaged by the flow tube as seen in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,848,509 or 4,478,286.
Also relevant are US Publications 2001/0045285; 2009/0184278 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,130,166; 4,197,879; 4,288,165; 4,446,922; 5,865,246; 6,223,824; 6,708,946; 6,695,286 and 4,368,871.
The basic components of the valve of
Those skilled in the art will better understand how pressure equalization is obtained before the ball is turned from a review of the detailed description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while recognizing that the technique is by no means limited to downhole ball valves but can be used in a variety of tools where trapped pressure results in differentials that may damage the component to be moved or the actuating system for it if such differentials are not resolved before attempting to move the component. Those skilled in the art will further understand that the full scope of the invention is to be found in the appended claims.
A pressure equalizing system allows flow past an upper seal on a movable member downhole that in turn allows pressure to be delivered from uphole into what had previously been an isolated low pressure zone. The pressure differential across the member is equalized before attempting to move the member into another position. In the preferred embodiment the member is a ball in a ball valve for subterranean use.
A lower seat sleeve 24 has a seat 26 in which a seal 28 is located for contact with the ball 12. The sleeve 24 is biased against the ball 12 by a spring that is not shown that is located on the housing 10 but further downhole. An upper seat sleeve 30 has a seat 32 in which a seal 34 is located for contact with the ball 12. The biasing spring that is not shown pushes the assembly of the lower seat sleeve 24, the ball 12 and its frame 16 and the upper seat sleeve 30 against housing component 36. The cage 18 moves relatively to the frame 16 and over the frame 16 to operate the ball 12. Seal 38 seals between the lower seat sleeve 24 and the housing 10. Together seals 38 and 28 retain downhole pressure in higher pressure zone 40 from reaching the intermediate zone which is also referred to as the lower pressure zone 42, which extends from below to above cage 18 and further encompasses the passage 44 inside the ball 12. In the closed position pressure in zone 42 migrates into passage 44 around the pins 14. Above the ball 12 the zone 42 is further defined by seal 34 located in the upper seat sleeve 30 as well as seal 46 shown in
As seen in
Those skilled in the art can appreciate that the disclosed modes of pressure equalization are cheaper and faster than running a tool into the valve assembly to provide access into zone 42 by physically shifting a part such as seat sleeve 30 to get seal 34 away from ball 12 so that pressure from the wellhead can then be applied to equalize zone 42 with zone 40. In the present invention the housing does not need to be expensively machined for internal bypass passages that need one or more check valves which have small moving parts that also need protection from debris that may be in the well fluid. Instead, the mere creation of enough differential across a seal so that flow and pressure can migrate from zone 50 into zone 42 gets the job done and the ball 12 can then be operated in the normal manner.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and various alternatives and is not intended to embody the broadest scope of the invention, which is determined from the claims appended below, and properly given their full scope literally and equivalently.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3273649 | Tamplen | Sep 1966 | A |
3421733 | Steward, Jr. | Jan 1969 | A |
3667505 | Radig | Jun 1972 | A |
3741249 | Leutwyler | Jun 1973 | A |
3778029 | Baker | Dec 1973 | A |
3799204 | Watkins et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3826462 | Taylor | Jul 1974 | A |
3827494 | Crowe | Aug 1974 | A |
3830297 | Cockrell | Aug 1974 | A |
3849218 | Beckwith et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3850242 | Crowe | Nov 1974 | A |
3853175 | Boyadjeff et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3854502 | Mott | Dec 1974 | A |
3856085 | Holden et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3868995 | Crowe | Mar 1975 | A |
3971438 | Crowe | Jul 1976 | A |
3987854 | Callihan et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4044835 | Mott | Aug 1977 | A |
RE29471 | Giroux | Nov 1977 | E |
4100969 | Randermann, Jr. | Jul 1978 | A |
4103744 | Akkerman | Aug 1978 | A |
4130166 | Akkerman et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4140153 | Deaton | Feb 1979 | A |
4144937 | Jackson et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4197879 | Young | Apr 1980 | A |
4278130 | Evans et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4288165 | Fewel | Sep 1981 | A |
4289165 | Fredd | Sep 1981 | A |
4368871 | Young | Jan 1983 | A |
4446922 | Bowyer et al. | May 1984 | A |
4448216 | Speegle et al. | May 1984 | A |
4452311 | Speegle et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4478286 | Fineberg | Oct 1984 | A |
5052657 | Winship | Oct 1991 | A |
5346178 | Baker | Sep 1994 | A |
5564502 | Crow et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5865246 | Brown | Feb 1999 | A |
5890698 | Domytrak | Apr 1999 | A |
5893389 | Cunningham | Apr 1999 | A |
6065535 | Ross | May 2000 | A |
6223824 | Moyes | May 2001 | B1 |
6260850 | Beall et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283217 | Deaton | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296061 | Leismer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6644408 | Ives | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6695286 | Florio et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6698712 | Milberger et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708946 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6848509 | Myerley | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866100 | Gudmestad et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7128151 | Corbett | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7537052 | Robichaux et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7614452 | Kenison et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20010045285 | Russell | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030056951 | Kaszuba | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040035586 | Gudmestad et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040069489 | Corbett | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040220448 | Henkel et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226721 | Feluch et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060076062 | Andersson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060243329 | Doble | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070113900 | Greene et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119789 | Layton | May 2007 | A1 |
20080110632 | Beall | May 2008 | A1 |
20080217248 | Gebauer | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090020291 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090050549 | Kerfoot | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090184278 | Beall et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110088906 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |