This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present invention, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
A choke is a restriction located in a pipeline to limit flow or reduce downstream pressure. Chokes are typically either a fixed orifice choke or a variable orifice choke. For example, the choke may include a variable orifice controlled using a globe valve. Regardless of type, chokes restrict free flow of the fluid within the pipeline. Fixed-orifice chokes can wear out over time. Furthermore, fixed-orifice chokes are not adjustable, and changes in desired flow, changes in fluid properties of the fluid flowing through the pipeline, and/or wear on the choke provides motivation to adjust a choke which is impossible for fixed-orifice chokes. However, adjustable-orifice chokes are more complex and require monitoring. For example, the adjustable-orifice chokes may be monitored using a control systems. Adjustable-orifice chokes also suffer from wear and may also have reduced internal clearances that may clog more easily than fixed-orifice chokes. Both choke types use regular maintenance to ensure that they are working properly and replacement of parts of the choke that are worn.
Various features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying figures in which like characters represent like parts throughout the figures, wherein:
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. These described embodiments are only exemplary of the present invention. Additionally, in an effort to provide a concise description of these exemplary embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
When introducing elements of various embodiments of the present invention, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
As discussed herein, a pressure exchanger (PX) device is used as a choke based on the inherent flow from a high pressure side to a low pressure side based on the compressibility of the fluid in the chamber. As discussed below, an inlet into the PX may use a high pressure in (HPIN) port and an outlet may use a low pressure out port. In some embodiments, at least one or two ports of the PX may go unused in the choke implementation. As a rotor of the PX turns fluid volume in a chamber of the rotor is compressed by high pressure flow from the HPIN inlet. A portion of the compressed fluid is then discharged in the outlet (e.g., low pressure out) as it expands into the low pressure section. The amount of flow is a function of the volume of the chamber, the number of chambers, the RPM of the rotor of a PX, fluid properties of the fluid being controlled, and differential pressure in the fluid. For example, if the fluid is more compressible, the flow would increase since more fluid is compressed into a chamber each rotation than a lower compressible fluid. Specifically, a gas or a gas/liquid combo would result in an increased flow in relation to a pure liquid flow. The amount of flow also is also dependent upon an amount of pressure in the HP line since higher pressure would compress the fluid more.
As discussed herein, in some embodiments, the pressure exchanger used as a choke may be a rotating isobaric pressure exchanger (e.g., rotary PX). Isobaric pressure exchangers may be generally defined as devices that transfer fluid pressure between a high-pressure inlet stream and a low-pressure inlet stream at efficiencies in excess of approximately 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, or 90% without utilizing centrifugal technology.
The PX may include one or more chambers (e.g., 1 to 100) to facilitate pressure transfer and equalization of pressures between volumes of first and second fluids. In some embodiments, the pressures of the volumes of first and second fluids may not completely equalize. Thus, in certain embodiments, the PX may operate isobarically, or the PX may operate substantially isobarically (e.g., wherein the pressures equalize within approximately +/−1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 percent of each other). In certain embodiments, a first pressure of a first fluid (e.g., a high pressure energized fluid from the rig or ship) may be greater than a second pressure of a second fluid (e.g., used drilling mud). For example, the first pressure may be between approximately 5,000 kPa to 25,000 kPa, 20,000 kPa to 50,000 kPa, 40,000 kPa to 75,000 kPa, 75,000 kPa to 100,000 kPa or greater than the second pressure. Thus, the PX may be used to transfer pressure from a first fluid (e.g., high pressure energized fluid from the rig or ship) at a higher pressure to a second fluid (e.g., used drilling mud) at a lower pressure.
As explained above, the pressure exchanger in typical operation generally transfers work and/or pressure between first and second fluids. These fluids may be multi-phase fluids such as gas/liquid flows, gas/solid particulate flows, liquid/solid particulate flows, gas/liquid/solid particulate flows, or any other multi-phase flow. Moreover, these fluids may be non-Newtonian fluids (e.g., shear thinning fluid), highly viscous fluids, non-Newtonian fluids containing particles, or highly viscous fluids containing particles. However, some flow may occur from the HP input port to the LP side of the pressure exchanger during pressure transfer. This principle may be used to continue flow from the HP port to a LP port with a reduced pressure inherently acting as choke in the flow of fluid through the pressure exchanger. In some embodiments, the flow may also be reduced versus typical use of the pressure exchanger. For example, in some embodiments, if a dual fluid transfer processes 300 gallons per minute, the flow in a single fluid choke application may be 1 gallon per minute. However, this flow may be adjusted due to speed of the rotation of a rotor of the pressure exchanger. For instance, the pressure exchanger is coupled to an electric motor that controls a speed of rotation of the rotor of the pressure exchanger thereby controlling flow through the pressure exchanger as a variable choke. The speed can also be controlled by controlling a rate of flow through an LP in port to an LP out port, and/or flow through an HP in port to an HPOUT port.
In the illustrated embodiment of
With respect to the PX 10, an operator has control over the extent of mixing between the first and second fluids, which may be used to improve the operability of pressurized or pressurizing systems. For example, varying the proportions of the first and second fluids entering the PX 10 allows the operator to control the amount of fluid mixing within the pressurized or pressurizing systems. Three characteristics of the PX 10 that affect mixing are: the aspect ratio of the rotor chambers 68, the short duration of exposure between the first and second fluids, and the creation of a liquid barrier (e.g., an interface) between the first and second fluids within the rotor chambers 68. First, the rotor chambers 68 are generally long and narrow, which stabilizes the flow within the PX 10. In addition, the first and second fluids may move through the chambers 68 in a plug flow regime with very little axial mixing. Second, in certain embodiments, at a rotor speed of approximately 1200 RPM, the time of contact between the first and second fluids may be less than approximately 0.15 seconds, 0.10 seconds, or 0.05 seconds, which again limits mixing of the streams. Third, a small portion of the rotor chamber 68 is used for the exchange of pressure between the first and second fluids. Therefore, a volume of fluid remains in the chamber 68 as a barrier between the first and second fluids. All these mechanisms may limit mixing within the PX 10.
In addition, because the PX 10 is configured to be exposed to the first and second fluids, certain components of the PX 10 may be made from materials compatible with the components of the first and second fluids. In addition, certain components of the PX 10 may be configured to be physically compatible with other components of the fluid handling system. For example, the ports 54, 56, 58, and 60 may comprise flanged connectors to be compatible with other flanged connectors present in the piping of the fluid handling system. In other embodiments, the ports 54, 56, 58, and 60 may comprise threaded or other types of connectors.
In
In
In
In
In
The PX 10 may be used as a choke without modifying the PX 10 from a configuration used to transfer pressure as discussed above. Instead, flow into and out of certain ports may be blocked. For example, returning to
In
This volume may also be supplemented by fluid passing leaking from PX 10 due to clearances between the rotor 44 and the housing 42 or the end plates 62 and 64. The rate of flow may be controlled by an electric, positive displacement hydraulic, or centrifugal turbine machine. Additionally or alternatively, force for rotating the rotor 44 may include momentum transfer on expanding fluid exiting the rotor or dense fluids entering the rotor. Indeed, the chambers 68 in the rotor 44 may be angled (in
Although the PX 10 may be used as a choke without modifying the PX 10 itself, a custom or modified PX may be used. For example,
It should be noted that although the port 60 is discussed as an LPIN port in pressure exchange implementations of the PX 10, the port 60 is acting as an LPOUT port in the choke implementation discussed herein. Moreover, any opposing pair of ports may be used in the choke implementation of PX 10 or PX 100. For example, a high pressure port may be paired with a low pressure port rather than with another high pressure port, and a low pressure port may be paired with a high pressure port rather than another low pressure port. Indeed,
Regardless of the embodiment, the PX 10 and 102, when used as a choke, employ a process 150 as illustrated in
As noted previously, the amount of flow is a function of the volume of the chamber, the number of chambers in the rotor, the RPM of the rotor of a PX, fluid properties of the fluid being controlled, and differential pressure in the fluid. For example, if the fluid is more compressible, the flow would increase since more fluid is compressed into a chamber each rotation than a lower compressible fluid. Specifically, a gas or a gas/liquid combo would result in an increased flow in relation to a pure liquid flow. The amount of flow also is also dependent upon an amount of pressure in the HP line since higher pressure would compress the fluid more. Also, to achieve more flow, a PX may be formed of a more elastic material or increase clearances between the rotor and end plates. Additionally or alternatively, additional components may be added to the rotor chambers to in. As previously noted, the RPM of the rotor 44 may be controlled using a motor 11 (e.g., as illustrated in
As another way of controlling flow of the PX may be using recirculation of fluids into the PX. For example,
As can be appreciated, chokes are abundant in numerous implementations, such a oil and gas drilling (e.g., depressurization of used pressurized mud returning from a well-bore), wellhead chokes for oil or gas mixtures exiting a well, off-shore and on-shore processing, refineries, chemical processing plants, refrigeration, gas compression, and gas liquification. Specifically, the choke may replace level control valves, flow control valves, pipeline chokes, and other valves that may be used to restrict fluid flow. The PX as choke may reduce damage from flashing or cavitation is common in standard chokes; may address critical flow choke systems with varying gas-oil ratios better than typical choke systems; may increase flow stability with slugs of liquid or gas; and reduce amounts of shear, turbulence, and cavitation to the fluid that may result in undesirable homogenization of fluids, breaking of long chain molecules, or other undesired changes to the fluid being flowed. Also, the PX enables variable flow flexibility (e.g., using a motor) without the drawbacks of typical choke valves. Since the rotor system of the PX is less likely to use maintenance than typical choke valves, the PX choke may utilize less monitoring and be replaced less frequently.
Moreover, the pressure exchanger as choke device has an added benefit as compared to a traditional choke in that it is fail-safe. Typically, a choke actively moves a component such as a plug or needle into a seat in order to shut off. In case of a mechanical failure or large piece of debris inhibiting such movement, the valve cannot close or operate properly. This extra flow can pose a safety concern as undesirable flow or pressure occurs downstream of the valve. The pressure exchanger as choke has only a single moving part, the rotor. The rotor spins to allow flow. In the case of any failure that prevents rotation, the flow through the valve would stop. Thus, the valve could be safer to operate than a typical choke device since the pressure exchanger as choke includes an inherent fail-safe operation.
While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3234736 | Spalding | Feb 1966 | A |
3431747 | Hashemi | Mar 1969 | A |
4796595 | El-Nashar | Jan 1989 | A |
4887942 | Hauge | Dec 1989 | A |
6540487 | Polizos | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7997853 | Pique | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20060037907 | Shumway | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20090180903 | Martin | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110008182 | Krogsgard | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110176936 | Andrews | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20130294944 | Hirosawa | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20150184492 | Ghasripoor | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160032702 | Gay et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160040510 | Martin | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160138649 | Anderson | May 2016 | A1 |
20160146229 | Martin | May 2016 | A1 |
20160160881 | Anderson | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160281487 | Ghasripoor | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
799143 | Aug 1958 | GB |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/036170 dated Sep. 4, 2017; 17 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170350428 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62346338 | Jun 2016 | US |