The present invention relates to systems for applying coatings under pressure to a web of material. A variety of coatings may be used, such as, but not restricted to, solvent- or water-based coatings, and the web may be made of a variety of materials, such as, but not restricted to, steel, aluminum, textiles, paper or film. U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,964 “Pankake” is an example of prior art roll coating.
The primary known technology for application of film in the range of 1 milligram per square inch to 30+milligrams per square inch of fluid on a substrate at speeds greater than 250 feet per minute involves a process known as roll coating. This involves picking up a fluid out of an open pan with a pick-up roll or feeding the fluid by gravity into a top nip. (A nip is the pinch point between rollers.) The fluid is then transferred from that roll to the next or is transmitted through a nip to the next roll. Eventually, the fluid is transferred from a roll to the web.
Another approach commonly used for applying fluid to a substrate involves the use of a die or slot. This process is normally limited to speeds up to approximately 200 feet per minute. The fluid may be deposited onto a roll for transfer to the substrate or directly onto the substrate with this method.
Coating being picked up out of a pan, sprayed, or nip fed is exposed to ambient conditions and the atmosphere. This permits dry out or skinning-over and evaporation of volatiles that contribute to product variability and environmental pollution, foaming, and splashing. Numerous other defects are also associated with unstable or uncontrolled fluid dynamics that occur at the entry point of the roll into the fluid contained in the pan, the exit point of the roll out of the fluid in the pan, or at the nip point. Some of these defects are often labeled as skips, seashore, ribbing, blisters, voids, shinnies, or splotching. The fluid picked up out of a pan is susceptible to being slung from the roll ends, creating a safety hazard, product defects, and a mess.
The appearance and thickness of the applied fluid is governed by a very complex relationship between the equipment configuration, equipment settings, and the fluid characteristics. Some of these variables include the number of rolls, direction of rotation of the rolls, roll material, roll finish, roll diameter, roll hardness, roll geometry, nip pressures, fluid viscosity, and fluid rheology. The relationships of all of these variables in the roll coatings process today provide a relatively small window for successful application of a specific fluid at a specific thickness. Fluids are very often applied at viscosities of 10 to 500 centistokes, depending on the desired applied film thickness. This requires the addition of large volumes of solvents or carrier fluid in many cases. The evaporation of these large volumes of solvents into the atmosphere is very undesirable from an environmental standpoint. Also, since the solvents evaporate from the open pan during the process, the characteristics of the coating are constantly changing during the process, making it very difficult to control the process.
The set-up of the above process must also be done in a way to achieve the desired film thickness while minimizing an appearance defect known as ribbing in the roll coating process. Typically, fluids are reduced in viscosity, and long flow-out zones are provided. These flow-out zones permit the ribs to be leveled out.
The use of open pans also creates major limitations to rapid, repeatable product changes. Typically, a product change for a pan feed system requires to between 10 minutes and several hours. To achieve product changes in less than 30 minutes usually requires additional investments of millions of dollars in capital equipment and labor intensive activities on major web processing lines.
As will be seen from the subsequent description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, these and other limitations and shortcomings of the prior art are overcome by the present invention.
The present invention includes a device for and a method of-applying a coating to a material web such as, but not restricted to, a sheet of steel, aluminum, textile, paper, or film. An elongated feed nozzle is used to feed coating material under pressure. The pressure may be supplied by gravity or by a low pressure pump. The feed nozzle seals-up against either the web or a roll. The feed nozzle includes a fluid reservoir, a metering surface, end seals (end closures) and a back seal. The fluid reservoir, in conjunction with the end seals and the back seal, forms a cavity which contains the fluid as it is being fed through the feed nozzle. This avoids all the problems of having the coating in open trays. The present invention further provides a mechanism for rotating one nozzle out of the operating position and another nozzle into operating position,permitting a very quick change of coatings. With this arrangement, the nozzle that is off-line can be cleaned and prepared while the on-line nozzle is operating. The present invention also provides a support spring, which supports the nozzle and provides automatic position adjustment of the nozzle in response to the amount of force being exerted by the nozzle. The preferred embodiment also provides a nozzle contact angle adjustment mechanism, a mechanism to adjust the profile of the metering surface, a feed nozzle force sensor, a feed nozzle cleaning assembly, and an applicator roll cleaning assembly. A stiffener is used to make the metering surface rigid. The stiffener can be integral with the feed nozzle, or a separate stiffener can be attached to the feed nozzle. A preferred embodiment permits feed nozzle force control and contact surface angle control to be operated independently of one another, which cannot be achieved with die or slot coating. These technologies require precise control of clearances. The support spring, as the frame deflects and polymer covered rolls deform, permits the rotation of the feed nozzle to maintain a proper geometry, permitting increased control and a wider film thickness control range for a specific nozzle shape. The additional dynamic actuators of nozzle force and metering surface add new quality, speed and film thickness capability to web coating. Dynamic feed nozzle force control can be accomplished independent of reservoir cavity pressure and metering surface contact angle.
The feed nozzle and support frame can include a profile adjustment device to control the bending or profile across the feed nozzle bar, permitting variable coating thickness profiles or correcting variable thickness profiles across the web with this feed system. While the profile control of the housing or support is manual in the prototype described herein, the control can be done via hydraulic cylinders, stepper motors, pneumatic cylinders, manual linkages, etc. The profile control is not limited to the aforementioned but may be done in any manner that will permit controlled and repeatable flexing of the member.
Control of pressurized coating and coating build-up at ends of the feed bar is accomplished by means of an end seal in the feed nozzle bar. The end seal may have several different configurations.
The back seal may be made of any flexible blade compatible with the coating being applied that will seal and remain sealed against the surface being coated without causing damage. Examples of suitable materials include, but are not restricted to aluminum, steel, and plastic.
Looking at the details in
The stiffener beam 24 has first and, second opposed, substantially flat walls 34, 36 (see FIG. 2), and a feed nozzle 38 is mounted on each of those walls. The feed nozzles 38 are mounted opposite each other, with one inverted relative to the other so they can be selectively rotated into operating position by rotating the stiffener beam 24 as described above.
Referring to
The downstream edge or application metering surface 44 of the feed nozzle 38 is shaped specifically to provide the desired thickness and appearance characteristics for the specific substrate or roll and fluid. It may be flat, rounded, grooved, or any number of shapes. Generally the metering surface 44 is tapered to provide a wider gap at the lower edge 54 (the leading edge where the roller enters) and a narrower gap at the upper edge 56, the downstream edge where the roller leaves the nozzle 38. As will be explained in more detail later, the metering surface 44 is shaped to provide the desired coating characteristics through hydrodynamic effects along the length of the roll/substrate and metering nip. Harder surfaces or thicker coatings may require a concave shape, while softer surfaces and thicker coatings may use flat or convex metering surface 44 contours.
The ends of the feed nozzle 38 are sealed to the roll 57 (or substrate 72) by the end seals 58 to ensure the inside of the feed nozzle 38 remains evenly pressurized across its entire width. The end seals 58 may-be a labyrinth design seal as shown, or they may be mechanically contacting seals or pressurized fluid seals depending on the lubricity of the coating. The gap 50 between the back seal 48, the metering surface 44, and the end seals 58 is bridged by the roll 57 (or substrate 72). Fluid in the nozzle or feed bar 38 first contacts the roll 57 (or substrate 72) as the surface of the roll 57 passes the top of the back seal 48, and the thickness of the coating fluid on the roll 57 (or substrate 72) is determined by the gap between the metering surface 44 and the roll as well as by the viscosity of the fluid and the hydrodynamics as the roll rotates past the metering surface 44.
The left and right end seals 58 are shown best in
The contour of the labyrinth end seal 58 should be shaped to provide a clearance equal to the desired film thickness between the roll 57 (or substrate 72) and the seal 58 at the apex 64 of the seal 58. This clearance should transition smoothly such that, at a point lined up with the trailing edge of the back seal 48, the clearance between the end seal 58 and the roll 57 (or substrate 72) is approximately 0.001″ to 0.008″.
An alternative preferred embodiment for a labyrinth style end seal 58A is shown in
A labyrinth end seal 58, 58A may be flexible or rigid. If the roll 57 (or substrate 72) deflects by more than approximately 0.003″ across the product range, then a deflectable, self-correcting end seal 58A should be considered. The end seal 58A depicted in
Each of the feed nozzles 38 is coupled to and reinforced by a stiffener 24 (See FIG. 11). In this embodiment, the stiffener 24 includes two walls, 34, 36. The stiffener beam 24 in this embodiment is a fabricated beam that also houses the feed pipes 68, which feed coating to the nozzles 38. The profile of the metering surface 44 of the feed bar or nozzle 38 may be adjusted in order to vary the coating thickness across the width of the web 72 or in order to make the thickness constant by adjusting the position of the metering surface 44 relative to the stiffener 24. As shown in
In order to feed pressurized coating to the nozzles 38, there are left and right feed pipes 68, projecting out the left and right ends of the stiffener beam 24 along the axis of rotation of the stiffener beam 24. Each feed pipe 68 bends and extends to its respective nozzle 38. As shown in
Coating material is piped under pressure through a respective feed pipe 68 to a respective nozzle 38. In this preferred embodiment, the coating is pumped into a constant head tank, and the head of the coating fluid in the tank maintains a constant operating pressure. There is also a tank of cleaning fluid, and, by switching valves and rotating a cleaning assembly into place, as will be described later, cleaning fluid can be circulated through a nozzle 38 to clean the nozzle.
Adjacent to the nozzle 38 which is in the forward, operating position, is the roll 57. In this preferred embodiment, the roll 57 preferably is an applicator roll, which picks up coating from the nozzle 38 and then transfers the coating to a moving web 72 of material rotating over an adjacent backup roll 74. This arrangement is shown schematically in FIG. 3.
There are various sensors and control mechanisms for controlling the relative positions between the metering surface 44 and the roll 57 and the amount of force applied by the metering surface 44, which will be described later.
The stiffener beam 24 is supported by support bearings 26, which are coupled to the support springs 22 through the mounting blocks 23 (See FIG. 14). Each support spring 22 is fixed at one end to one of the nozzle support frame members 16, which, as described above, is mounted for linear motion along the base 12. There is a force sensor 32 mounted on each of the nozzle support frame members 16, and there is a force sensor 32 mounted on each of the roll support frame members 14. The position of each of the frame members 14, 16, is controlled by a motor 20, which rotates a threaded shaft 106, which pushes and pulls its respective frame member 14,16 along a linear track 108, where it is supported by linear bearings 110. Thus, the motors 20 control the relative positions of the nozzle 38 and the roll 57, setting the gap between the metering surface 44 and the roll 57 and controlling the force exerted by the nozzle 38 on the roll 57. In this preferred embodiment, the motors 20 are stepper motors. However, other kinds of motors may be used, such as servo motors and hydraulic servos. The motors 20 may be controlled in response to a central controller, which receives signals from the force sensors 32, thereby controlling the force with which the coating fluid is applied to the roller 57. While the feed nozzle force sensor 32 is shown as being mounted on the frame 16, it may be incorporated into the support spring 22, may be mounted under the support spring 22, or may be incorporated into the feed nozzle slide position/force adjuster linear bearing arrangement 18. The stiffener 24 may be integral with the feed nozzle 38. However, in this preferred embodiment, the stiffener 24 is a separate member, which permits adjustment of the profile of the feed nozzle 38, as was explained above. While stepper motors 20 are used in this embodiment, other control mechanisms, such as hydraulic motors, hydraulic cylinders, and hand cranks could be used instead.
By mounting the feed nozzle 38 on the support springs 22, an additional adjustment is provided. As the fluid pressure builds up between the feed nozzle 38 and the roll 57, the springs 22 extend, causing the stiffener 24 and the on-line feed nozzle 38 to rotate slightly up and away from the roll 57, and, as the fluid pressure is reduced, the springs 22 retract, rotating the feed bar 38 back downwardly and closer to the roll 57, so that a proper metering gap is maintained at the metering surface 44. In this preferred embodiment, the springs 22 are leaf springs having a thickness and arcuate shape designed to maintain the desired metering gap for a particular fluid. It is expected that various types and shapes of springs will be used depending upon the desired thickness and the characteristics of the coating fluid to be used.
By adjusting the shape of the reservoir cavity, the heat build up from the turbulence of the coating material can be controlled. The opening 70 from the feed pipe into the nozzle 38 is tapered to minimize turbulence (See FIG. 12). As the ratio of reservoir cavity cross sectional area to the exposed surface being coated increases, more heat is added to the coating due to turbulence.
As was explained earlier,
Contact force, reservoir cavity pressure, shape of the metering surface and contact angle are all control actuators. These actuators provide a wide operating control window and can be operated manually or can be fully automated and dynamically controlled via mathematical algorithms or product feedback. In the present embodiment, the bolts 76, 78 are controlled manually.
The pressure feed coating application system 10 enables complete control of the fluid through the application process. Pre-filtered and conditioned fluid is applied under pressure directly to the web 72 or to the applicator roll 57. Thus, there is no opportunity for the phenomena that create foam, skips, voids, shinnies, splotching, or slings to develop. The fluid is not open to the atmosphere, therefore the fluid cannot skin-over or dry-out. By keeping the coating fluid contained and by controlling the shape of the nozzle, the nozzle pressure, nozzle angle, relative positions of the nozzle 38 and roll 57, and the roll hardness, it is possible to provide precise control of the film thickness. Defects associated with unstable or uncontrolled fluid dynamics are eliminated. Coatings may be applied using this equipment at high speeds of over 250 feet per minute with very good appearance (no ribs) at a much wider range of fluid viscosities than was previously possible.
Under certain circumstances, it may be advantageous to use this system to apply coating to a roll one removed from an applicator roll. This roll may be operated in either the forward or reverse direction. This system still provides many advantages over conventional two or three roll, Roll Coating Systems.
The pressure feed coating application feed system 10 feeds pressurized coating into the sealed feed bar 38 with pressurized fluid against the roll or substrate as opposed to designed clearances used in die, slot and curtain application systems.
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the materials of construction of the stiffener beam and nozzle would typically be metal, usually steel or aluminum.
It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that modifications and additions may be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/678,228, filed Oct. 2, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,656,529, issued Dec. 2, 2003, which is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. PCT/US99/10819 designating the United States, filed May 18, 1999, and from U.S. Provisional application 60/086,047, filed May 19, 1998, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2761419 | Mercier et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
3079889 | Jacobs et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3131092 | Coghill | Apr 1964 | A |
3192895 | Galer | Jul 1965 | A |
3301214 | Coghill | Jan 1967 | A |
3486482 | Hunger | Dec 1969 | A |
3526528 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3884611 | Anderson et al. | May 1975 | A |
3940221 | Nissel | Feb 1976 | A |
4142010 | Pipkin et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4257343 | Kullander | Mar 1981 | A |
4327662 | Damrau | May 1982 | A |
4332543 | Fulton et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4351264 | Flaum et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4385960 | Zodrow et al. | May 1983 | A |
4480583 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4480898 | Taylor | Nov 1984 | A |
4836133 | Wohrle | Jun 1989 | A |
4839201 | Rantanen et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5099786 | Shibata et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5136972 | Naka et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5208078 | Ishibashi et al. | May 1993 | A |
5234500 | Korokeyi | Aug 1993 | A |
5318804 | Yoshida | Jun 1994 | A |
5320679 | Derezinski et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329964 | Derezinski | Jul 1994 | A |
5395653 | Baum | Mar 1995 | A |
5411589 | Yoshida et al. | May 1995 | A |
5435847 | Shibata et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5484482 | Rantanen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5674319 | Slobodkin | Oct 1997 | A |
5743964 | Pankake | Apr 1998 | A |
5807434 | Innes | Sep 1998 | A |
6004394 | Gottwald | Dec 1999 | A |
6106900 | Innes et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42 41 792 | Jun 1994 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040112283 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60086047 | May 1998 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09678228 | Oct 2000 | US |
Child | 10707278 | US | |
Parent | PCTUS99/10819 | May 1999 | US |
Child | 09678228 | US |