This invention relates to a pressure indicator.
There are many applications where a low cost pressure indicator is required for indicating the pressure of a liquid or gas. Sometimes the liquid or gas is flowing and at other times it is hydrostatic.
In the medical field, contamination is also a serious problem and it would be highly desirable for pressure indicators to be available which were inexpensive so that they could be discarded after a single use.
Medical applications include monitoring of the pressure of injectable fluids in typical situations as follows:
(i) Injections
During the injection of therapeutic agents into human tissue high pressures should be avoided where this indicates that the site of the injection is other than intended. Arterial injection produces pulsatile pressures of >100 mmHg. Injection into nerves characteristically produce static pressures of >1000 mmHg. Injection into tendon's and other non porous tissues may produce even higher pressures. There is often a need for the physician or nurse to be aware of such pressures as the tactile force applied to a syringe is not a consistent guide to the pressures generated due to variation in piston diameter between syringes of differing capacity.
(ii) Flow Rate Monitoring
If a fluid is injected through a fixed resistance then the pressure provides an indication of flow rate which is desirable during the injection of antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents and radiological dyes. Such a pressure gauge can be calibrated to show the desired flow rate and hence the physician or nurse can easily inject the agent within the manufacturer's guidelines.
(iii) Pressure Monitoring for Ancillary Equipment
Many medical devices require pressure monitoring as part of their functionality. The pneumatic pressure devices commonly used to force fluid from Intravenous fluid bags require a pressure gauge for correct pressurisation. Filling of various catheters placed in body cavities arteries etc. These have balloons that are inflated to provide mechanical force to seal or expand against the walls for such cavities or vessels.
(iv) Measurement of Airway Pressure
Various airway management devices (including resuscitation bags) provide positive pressure ventilation for patients lungs, monitoring of this pressure is desirable to avoid barotrauma to the lungs.
The characteristics that are important for such a device include:
(i) Cost
Low cost requires low cost components and as well as ease of manufacture.
(ii) Ease of Use
Pressure indication that is easily read and preferably with an analogue indicating scale for easy interpretation.
(iii) Minimal Dead Space
If the gauge is used for the injection of fluids it is important that the internal mechanism of the gauge has minimal dead space as this tends to introduce air into the injection system. Further, the therapeutic agent may be of great value and hence it is undesirable for it to fill the gauge's deadspace and hence to unavailable for injection. Finally the presence of air in the gauge can blunt the response of the gauge to pressure change.
(iv) Compact Design
It is important that the gauge be of the minimum size practical as in many applications it is undesirable to have a bulky or heavy device attached to a syringe or other system.
(v) Accuracy
It is important for such a gauge to have appropriate level of accuracy, +/−7.5% has been achieved.
It is a general object of the invention to provide a pressure indicator which at least partially satisfies all or some of the criteria above.
According to the present invention there is provided a pressure indicator:
a body having a pressure chamber which has an inlet for communication with a fluid;
a resilient diaphragm having a periphery sealed against the body and having one side thereof exposed to the fluid within the chamber;
an indicating arm having an inner end which is integrally formed with the other side of the diaphragm and an outer end arm which is adjacent to a scale,
the arrangement being such that pressure of the fluid within the chamber causes resilient deformation of the diaphragm which in turn causes the outer end of the arm to move relative to the scale thereby indicating the pressure of the fluid in the chamber.
Preferably, the chamber has an outlet and said fluid under pressure, in use, flows from the inlet to the outlet through the chamber.
Preferably, the indicator includes a fulcrum which serves to cause rotation of the arm on resilient deformation of the diaphragm.
Preferably, the fulcrum is integrally formed with the diaphragm.
Preferably, the diaphragm, arm and fulcrum are injection moulded from plastics material.
Preferably, the indicator includes a first housing coupled to the body, the diaphragm being arranged to resiliently expand into the first housing when the pressure of the fluid increases.
Preferably, the first housing includes formations which interlock with complementary formations on the body and wherein, in use, the periphery of the diaphragm is clamped between the body and the first housing.
Preferably, the fulcrum extends from a mounting point inwardly adjacent to the periphery of the diaphragm.
Preferably, the first housing includes guide means which engage or are engagable with the fulcrum to limit displacement of the fulcrum when the diaphragm expands.
Preferably, the indicator includes a second housing, the outer end of the indicating arm being located within the second housing.
Preferably, the second housing is integrally formed with the body.
The invention also provides a resilient diaphragm for use in a pressure indicator having a periphery which is, in use, exposed to the fluid within a chamber, and an indicating arm having an inner end which is integrally formed with the diaphragm and an outer end arm which is adjacent, in use, to a scale.
The invention also provides a pressure indicator:
a body having a pressure chamber which has an inlet for communication with a fluid under pressure;
a resilient diaphragm having a periphery sealed against the body and having one side thereof exposed to the fluid within the chamber;
an indicating arm having an inner end which is integrally formed with the other side of the diaphragm and an outer end arm which is adjacent to a scale;
a first housing includes formations which interlock with complementary formations on the body and wherein, in use, the periphery of the diaphragm is clamped between the body and the first housing,
the arrangement being such that pressure within the chamber causes resilient deformation of the diaphragm which in turn causes the outer end of the arm to move relative to the scale thereby indicating the pressure of the fluid in the chamber, characterised in that the indicator is formed from only three components.
The invention also provides a pressure indicator:
a body having a pressure chamber which has an inlet for communication with fluid under positive or negative pressure relative to atmosphere;
a resilient diaphragm having a periphery sealed against the body and having one side thereof exposed to the fluid within the chamber;
an indicating arm having an inner end which is integrally formed with the other side of the diaphragm and an outer end arm which is adjacent to a scale,
the arrangement being such that pressure within the chamber causes resilient deformation of the diaphragm which in turn causes the outer end of the arm to move relative to the scale thereby indicating the pressure of the fluid in the chamber.
The invention will now be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The drawings show a pressure indicating device 2 of the invention which is especially suited for single use medical applications such as indicating the pressure at which a liquid is injected into a patient via a syringe. Typically the pressure of the fluid needs to be in the range from 0 to 25 psi.
The indicating device 2 of the invention is made from three components which include a main body 4, diaphragm assembly 6 and diaphragm housing 8 as best seen in the exploded view of
The main body 4 is preferably injection moulded from plastics material such as clear polycarbonate. The main body 4 includes a conduit 10 which has an inlet 12 formed as a male Luer connector and an outlet 14 formed as a female Luer connector. The inlet and outlets could be interchanged. The conduit 10 is integrally formed with a cup-shaped body 16 which includes a cylindrical wall 18 and base wall 20. The base wall 20 includes a port 22 which communicates with the interior of the conduit 10. The base wall 20 is essentially flat or planar but it does include an annular projecting rib 24 located somewhat inwardly from the cylindrical wall 18. The cylindrical wall 18 includes an inwardly projecting lip 25 on its upper edge.
The main body 4 is integrally formed with an indicator housing 30 which is formed at an angle of about 45° relative to the axis of the conduit 10 as seen in
The diaphragm assembly 6 will now be described in more detail with reference to
The diaphragm housing 8 will now be described in more detail with reference to
The diaphragm housing 8 is injection moulded from clear polycarbonate as an integral moulding. It includes an annular base 70 from which extends a hollow frustoconical projection 72 which is partly closed by means of a top wall 73. As can best be seen from
The arrangement and dimensions of the three components are such that the diaphragm 50 is clamped between the main body 4 and the housing 8 with the indicating arm 52 projecting between the flanges 74 and into the indicator housing 30. More particularly, it will be seen from
After the three components have been fitted together, as described above, the top wall 38 can be rotated into its final position. This is schematically illustrated in
In use of the pressure indicating device 2 of the invention, fluid under pressure is located within the conduit 10. The fluid can be static or flowing. The port 22 communicates the pressurised fluid with the underside of the diaphragm 50 and, depending on the pressure of the fluid, the diaphragm 50 will resiliently deform, as schematically illustrated in
It will be appreciated that the second leg 62 which serves as the fulcrum for the indicating arm 52 is not completely independent of movement of the diaphragm 50 since it forms part of the bracket 58 which is moulded integrally with, the diaphragm 50. The illustrated device includes components which serve to stabilise the position of the indicating arm 52 so as to tend to make deflection of the indicating arm 52 more truly proportional to the pressure within the conduit 10. In the illustrated arrangement, the width of the first leg 60 is such that it is snugly received between inner flanges 100 and 102 which can be regarded as being contiguous with the flanges 74 and 76 respectively. The flanges 100 and 102 have inwardly directed conical pins 104 and 106 formed therewith. The arrangement is such that the conical pins 104 and 106 are received within the bores 64 and 66 respectively as shown in the schematic plan view of
A prototype of the pressure indicating device 2 has been constructed and tested. In the prototype, the diaphragm 50 had a nominal diameter of 18 mm and the length of the indicating arm 52 about 22 mm as measured from the centre line of the post 54.
The deflection of the diaphragm depends on the thickness of the diaphragm as well as its hardness. Table 1 below shows the typical deflection at the end of the indicating arm 52 for diaphragms of different thicknesses. In each case the hardness was Shore A 50.
In the illustrated arrangement, the main body 4 is formed with a conduit 10 which has an inlet and outlet which is appropriate for pressure measurement where the fluid under pressure flows through the conduit. It would be possible to block one of the outlets where the device was to be used for measurement of a fluid which is not flowing through the device. Alternatively, the main body 4 could be moulded with a single inlet port without an outlet.
The pressure indicator 2 described above is a compact and inexpensive device for indicating pressures. It is capable of indicating positive pressures, that is to say pressures above atmospheric. It is also possible to indicate negative pressures, that is to say pressures which are less than atmospheric. In other words, when there is a negative pressure at the port 22 the diaphragm 50 will be resiliently deformed in a direction towards the port 22. It is possible to modify the arrangement by changing the shape of the base wall 20 in order to accommodate greater degrees of resilient deformation of the diaphragm 50 when subjected to negative pressures.
As indicated above, the modified indicator 120 is specially designed so that it can readily indicate positive as well as negative pressures. A modification can be readily made to the device shown in
Many modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2009903814 | Aug 2009 | AU | national |
2010901240 | Mar 2010 | AU | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2099127 | Leech | Nov 1937 | A |
2252874 | Vischer | Aug 1941 | A |
2839788 | Dembiak | Jun 1958 | A |
2862498 | Weekes | Dec 1958 | A |
3529596 | Garner | Sep 1970 | A |
3554673 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3683908 | Michael et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3794036 | Carroll | Feb 1974 | A |
3931822 | Marici | Jan 1976 | A |
4056104 | Jaffe | Nov 1977 | A |
4067329 | Winicki et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4096759 | Desor | Jun 1978 | A |
4104357 | Blair | Aug 1978 | A |
4116201 | Shah | Sep 1978 | A |
4134407 | Elam | Jan 1979 | A |
4159722 | Walker | Jul 1979 | A |
4178938 | Au et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4178940 | Au et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4231365 | Scarberry | Nov 1980 | A |
4256099 | Dryden | Mar 1981 | A |
4285340 | Gezari et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4351330 | Scarberry | Sep 1982 | A |
4445366 | Gray | May 1984 | A |
4446864 | Watson et al. | May 1984 | A |
4453545 | Inoue | Jun 1984 | A |
4471775 | Clair et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4501273 | McGinnis | Feb 1985 | A |
4509514 | Brain et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4510273 | Miura et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4526196 | Pistillo | Jul 1985 | A |
4553540 | Straith | Nov 1985 | A |
4583917 | Shah | Apr 1986 | A |
4617015 | Foltz | Oct 1986 | A |
4630606 | Weerda et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4654643 | Meisenheimer et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4689041 | Corday et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4700700 | Eliachar | Oct 1987 | A |
4770170 | Sato et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4793327 | Frankel | Dec 1988 | A |
4798597 | Vaillancourt | Jan 1989 | A |
4809589 | Bertrand | Mar 1989 | A |
4825862 | Sato et al. | May 1989 | A |
4832020 | Augustine | May 1989 | A |
4850349 | Farahany | Jul 1989 | A |
4856510 | Kowalewski et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4872483 | Shah | Oct 1989 | A |
4924862 | Levinson | May 1990 | A |
4953547 | Poole, Jr. | Sep 1990 | A |
4972963 | Guarriello et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4981470 | Bombeck, IV | Jan 1991 | A |
4995388 | Brain et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5038766 | Parker | Aug 1991 | A |
5042469 | Augustine | Aug 1991 | A |
5042476 | Smith | Aug 1991 | A |
5060647 | Alessi | Oct 1991 | A |
5067496 | Eisele | Nov 1991 | A |
5174283 | Parker | Dec 1992 | A |
5203320 | Augustine | Apr 1993 | A |
5218970 | Turbull et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5235973 | Levinson | Aug 1993 | A |
5241325 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241956 | Brain et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249571 | Brain et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5273537 | Haskvitz et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5277178 | Dingley et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282464 | Brain et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297547 | Brain et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303697 | Brain et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305743 | Brain | Apr 1994 | A |
5311861 | Miller et al. | May 1994 | A |
5331967 | Akerson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5339805 | Parker | Aug 1994 | A |
5339808 | Don Michael | Aug 1994 | A |
5355879 | Brain et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361753 | Pothmann et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5391248 | Brain et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5400771 | Pirak et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5421325 | Cinberg et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5438982 | MacIntyre | Aug 1995 | A |
5443063 | Greenberg | Aug 1995 | A |
5452715 | Boussignac et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459700 | Jacobs | Oct 1995 | A |
5487383 | Levinson | Jan 1996 | A |
5529582 | Fukuhara et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546935 | Champeau | Aug 1996 | A |
5546936 | Virag et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551420 | Lurie et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5554673 | Shah | Sep 1996 | A |
5557049 | Ratner | Sep 1996 | A |
5569219 | Hakki et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5577693 | Corn | Nov 1996 | A |
5582167 | Joseph | Dec 1996 | A |
5584290 | Brain et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599301 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5623921 | Kinsinger et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626151 | Linden | May 1997 | A |
5632271 | Brain et al. | May 1997 | A |
RE35531 | Callaghan et al. | Jun 1997 | E |
5653229 | Greenberg | Aug 1997 | A |
5655528 | Pagan et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5682880 | Brain et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692498 | Lurie et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5694929 | Christopher | Dec 1997 | A |
5711293 | Brain et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5738094 | Hoftman | Apr 1998 | A |
5743254 | Parker | Apr 1998 | A |
5743258 | Sato et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746202 | Pagan et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771889 | Pagan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778872 | Fukunaga et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791341 | Bullard | Aug 1998 | A |
5794617 | Brunell et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5816240 | Komesaroff | Oct 1998 | A |
5819723 | Joseph | Oct 1998 | A |
5832916 | Lundberg et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850832 | Chu | Dec 1998 | A |
5855203 | Matter | Jan 1999 | A |
5856510 | Meng et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860418 | Lundberg et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865176 | O'Neil et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878745 | Brain et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881726 | Neame | Mar 1999 | A |
5893891 | Zahedi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896858 | Brain | Apr 1999 | A |
5915383 | Pagan | Jun 1999 | A |
5921239 | McCall et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924862 | White | Jul 1999 | A |
5935084 | Southworth | Aug 1999 | A |
5937860 | Cook | Aug 1999 | A |
5957133 | Hart | Sep 1999 | A |
5979445 | Neame et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983891 | Fukunaga | Nov 1999 | A |
5983896 | Fukunaga et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983897 | Pagan | Nov 1999 | A |
5988167 | Kamen | Nov 1999 | A |
5996582 | Turnbull | Dec 1999 | A |
6003510 | Anunta | Dec 1999 | A |
6003511 | Fukunaga et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003514 | Pagan | Dec 1999 | A |
6012452 | Pagan | Jan 2000 | A |
6021779 | Pagan | Feb 2000 | A |
6050264 | Greenfield | Apr 2000 | A |
6062219 | Lurie et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070581 | Augustine et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079409 | Brain | Jun 2000 | A |
D429811 | Bermudez et al. | Aug 2000 | S |
6095144 | Pagan | Aug 2000 | A |
6098621 | Esnouf | Aug 2000 | A |
6110143 | Kamen | Aug 2000 | A |
6116243 | Pagan | Sep 2000 | A |
6119695 | Augustine et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131571 | Lampotang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149603 | Parker | Nov 2000 | A |
6155257 | Lurie et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6213120 | Block et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224562 | Lurie et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234985 | Lurie et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240922 | Pagan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251093 | Valley et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269813 | Fitzgerald et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6315739 | Merilainen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6338343 | Augustine et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352077 | Shah | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6386199 | Alfery | May 2002 | B1 |
6390093 | Mongeon | May 2002 | B1 |
6422239 | Cook | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427686 | Augustin et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6439232 | Brain | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450164 | Banner et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6508250 | Esnouf | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511922 | Krishnaraj et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6546931 | Lin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6631720 | Brain et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647984 | O'Dea et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651666 | Owens | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6705318 | Brain | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6737345 | Lin et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6766801 | Wright | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7004169 | Brain et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7040322 | Fortuna et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051096 | Krawiec et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7051736 | Banner et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066178 | Gunaratnam et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096868 | Tateo et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097802 | Brain et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128071 | Brain et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134431 | Brain et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7156100 | Brain et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7159589 | Brain | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7383736 | Esnouf | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7566658 | Keum | Jul 2009 | B2 |
8013423 | Keum | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8033176 | Esnouf | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8358011 | Colburn et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
9528897 | Esnouf | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20030000534 | Alfery | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037790 | Brain | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051734 | Brain | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030101998 | Zocca et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131845 | Lin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030172925 | Zocca et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172935 | Miller | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040020491 | Fortuna | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050081861 | Nasir | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050139220 | Christopher | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050178388 | Kuo | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050274383 | Brain | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060124132 | Brain | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060201516 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254596 | Brain | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070240722 | Kessler | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080048332 | Park | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080142017 | Brain | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080173981 | Chinthakindi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090102052 | Ryu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090139524 | Esnouf | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090212439 | Farooq et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090261475 | Keum | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100216123 | Haria et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110024866 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110256546 | Moris et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110281432 | Farooq et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120174929 | Esnouf | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120186510 | Esnouf | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140034060 | Esnouf et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004-260-552 | Feb 2005 | AU |
2012750 | Sep 1990 | CA |
2067782 | May 1991 | CA |
2141167 | Jul 1995 | CA |
4447186 | Jul 1996 | DE |
100 42 172 | Apr 2001 | DE |
0 389 272 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0 402 872 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0 294 200 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 580 385 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 712 638 | May 1996 | EP |
0 732 116 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0 796 631 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 842 672 | May 1998 | EP |
0 845 276 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0 865 798 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0 922 465 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 935 971 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1 119 386 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 125 595 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 800 706 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1 529 190 | Oct 1978 | GB |
2 111 394 | Jul 1983 | GB |
2 205 499 | Dec 1988 | GB |
2 298 797 | Sep 1996 | GB |
2 317 342 | Mar 1998 | GB |
2 317 830 | Apr 1998 | GB |
2 318 735 | May 1998 | GB |
2 319 478 | May 1998 | GB |
2 321 854 | Aug 1998 | GB |
2 323 289 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2 323 290 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2 323 291 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2 323 292 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2 324 737 | Nov 1998 | GB |
2 359 996 | Sep 2001 | GB |
2 371 990 | Aug 2002 | GB |
2 405 588 | Mar 2005 | GB |
H03-39169 | Feb 1991 | JP |
H10-118182 | May 1998 | JP |
H10-216233 | Aug 1998 | JP |
H10-263086 | Oct 1998 | JP |
H10-277156 | Oct 1998 | JP |
H10-314308 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H10-323391 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H10-328303 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H11-128349 | May 1999 | JP |
H11-192304 | Jul 1999 | JP |
H11-206885 | Aug 1999 | JP |
P2000-152995 | Jun 2000 | JP |
P2003-528701 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO-9103207 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO-9107201 | May 1991 | WO |
WO-9112845 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO-9213587 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO-9402191 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO-9533506 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO-9712640 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO-9712641 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO-9816273 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9906093 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO-0009189 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0022985 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0023135 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0061212 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0174431 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0232490 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-2004030527 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004089453 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2005023350 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005058394 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2006026237 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006125989 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2008001724 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2012061869 | May 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 10th Ed., 1997, pp. 254 and 1029, definitions of Convex and Saddle. |
Neurometric Assessment of Adequacy of Intraoperative Anesthetic. Mar. 1999, 3 pages, www.pnl.gov/medical/info/neuro.htm. |
Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/254,594 (US 2012/0048279). |
Office Action dated May 20, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/254,594 (US 2012/0048279). |
Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/254,594 (US 2012/0048279). |
Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/254,594 (US 2012/0048279). |
Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,488 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,716,871). |
Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,488 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,716,871). |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 16, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,488 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,716,871). |
Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,776 (US 2010/0089393). |
Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,776 (US 2010/0089393). |
Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,776 (US 2010/0089393). |
Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,776 (US 2010/0089393). |
Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,776 (US 2010/0089393). |
Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,776 (US 2010/0089393). |
Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,776 (US 2010/0089393). |
Office Action dated May 25, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,558 (US 2010/0059061). |
Office Action dated May 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,558 (US 2010/0059061). |
Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,558 (US 2010/0059061). |
Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,558 (US 2010/0059061). |
Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,558 (US 2010/0059061). |
Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,558 (US 2010/0059061). |
Office Action dated May 13, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/029,831 (US 2014/0087380). |
Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/981,829 (US 2014/0034060). |
Abdelatti, M.O., “A Cuff Pressure Controller for Tracheal Tubes and Laryngeal Mask Airways,” Anaesthesia, 1999, 54, pp. 981-986, Blackwell Science Ltd. |
Benumof, “Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Asa Difficult Airway Algorithm,” Anesthesiology, 1996: 84:686-99. |
Benumof, “Management of the Difficult Adult Airway with Special Emphasis on Awake Tracheal Intubation,” Anesthesiology 75:1087-1110, 1991. |
Bernhard et al. “Adjustment of 1ntracuff Pressure to Prevent Aspiration,” Anesthesiology, 50: 363-366, 1979. |
Bernhard et al., “Physical Characteristics of and Rates of Nitrous Oxide Diffusion into Tracheal Tube Cuffs,” Anesthesiology 48:413-417, 1978. |
Brain et al., “A New Laryngeal Mask Prototype,” Anaesthesia, 1995, vol. 50, pp. 42-48. |
Brain et al., “The Laryngeal Mask Airway, Development and Preliminary Trials of a New Type of Airway,” Anaesthesia, 1985, vol. 40, pp. 356-361. |
Brain, “The Laryngeal Mask—A New Concept in Airway Management,” Br. J. Anaesth. (1983), 55, 801-805. |
Brain, “The Laryngeal Mask Airway—A Possible New Solution to Airway Problems in the Emergency Situation,” Archives of Emergency Medicine, 1984, 1, 229-232. |
Brain, “Three Cases of Difficult Intubation Overcome by the Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anaesthesia, 1985, vol. 40, pp. 353-355. |
Brimacombe, “The Split Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anaesthesia, Jul. 1993;48(7):639. |
Brodrick et al, “The Laryngeal Mask Airway, A Study of 100 Patients During Spontaneous Breathing,” Anaesthesia, 1989, vol. 44, pp. 238-241. |
Burgard et al, “The Effect of Laryngeal Mask Cuff Pressure on Postoperative Sore Throat Incidence,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 8:198-201, 1996. |
Caplan et al, “Adverse Respiratory Events in Anesthesia: A Closed Claims Analysis,” Anesthesiology 72:828-833, 1990. |
Craven, “Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia: Measuring Effect in Ounces, Pounds, and Tons,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 229-231 (Feb. 1, 1995). |
Cuff-Pressure Control CDR 2000, Technical Data, 4 pages, Manufacturer ESW-EXTEL Systems Wedel, Gesellschaft fur Ausrustung mbH, 2000. |
Davies et al, “Laryngeal Mask Airway and Tracheal Tube Insertion by Unskilled Personnel,” The Lancet, 1990; 336:977-79. |
de Mello et al, “The Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Primary Anaesthesia,” Anaesthesia. Sep. 1990;45(9):793-4. |
Doyle et al, “Intraoperative Awareness: A Continuing Clinical Problem,” Educational Synopses in Anesthesiology and Critical care Medicine, The Online Journal of Anesthesiology vol. 3 No. 6, 8 pages, Jun. 1996. |
Engbers Practical Use of “Diprifusor” Systems, Anaesthesia, 1998, 53, Supplement 1, pp. 28-34. |
Eriksson et al, “Functional Assessment of the Pharynx at Rest and During Swallowing in Partially Paralyzed Humans,” Anesthesiology vol. 87, No. 5, pp. 1035-1042, Nov. 1997. |
Glen, “The Development of ‘Diprifusor’: a TCI System for Propofol,” Anaesthesia, 1998, 53, Supplement 1, pp. 13-21. |
Gray et al, “Development of the Technology for ‘Diprifusor’ TCI Systems,” Anaesthesia, 1998, Supplement 1, pp. 22-27. |
Heath, “Endotracheal Intubation Through the Laryngeal Mask—Helpful When Laryngoscopy is Difficult or Dangerous,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 1991, Supplement 4, 41-45. |
Hickey et al, “Cardiovascular Response to Insertion of Brain's Laryngeal Mask,” Anaesthesia, 1990, vol. 45, pp. 629-633. |
Inomata et al, “Transient Bilateral Vocal Cord Paralysis After Insertion of a Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anaesthesiology,82;787-788, 1995. |
International Search Report in PCT/GB2006/001913 dated Aug. 26, 2006. |
Jacobson et al, “A Study of Intracuff Pressure Measurements, Trends and Behaviour in Patients During Prolonged Periods of Tracheal intubation,” Br. J. Anaesth. (1981), 53, 97-101. |
Kambic et al, “Intubation Lesions of the Larynx,” Br. J. Anaesth. (1978), 50, 587-590. |
Kangas, “Neurometric Assessment of Adequacy of Intraoperative Anesthetic,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, retrieved May 13, 2008, 3 pages. |
Kapila, et al., “Proceedings of the Anaesthetic Research Society, Leeds Meeting, Mar. 31-Apr. 1, 1995,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995, 75:228P-229P. |
Lindholm, “Methods,” ACTA Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Prolonged Endotracheal Intubation, Chapter III, pp. 32-46 (1969). |
Majumder et al, “Bilateral Lingual Nerve Injury Following the Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anaesthesia, 1998, 53, 169-191. |
Martin, Patentability of Methods of Medical Treatment: A Comparative Study, J. Pat & Trademark Off. Soc'y, pp. 381-423, 2000. |
Miller, “A Pressure Regulator for the Cuff of the Tracheal Tube,” Anaesthesia, 1992, vol. 47, pp. 594-596. |
Muthuswamy et al., “The Use of Fuzzy Integrals and Bispectral Analysis of the Electroencephalogram to Predict Movement Under Anestheia,” Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 46, No. 3, Mar. 1999. |
Nagai et al., “Unilateral hypoglossal nerve paralysis following use of the laryngeal mask airway,” Anaesthesia, vol. 49, pp. 603-406, 1994. |
Observations by a third party concerning European Patent Application No. 99 947 765.6 dated Jan. 18, 2005, 4 pages. |
Patel et al., “Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressure,” Anaesthesia, vol. 39, pp. 862-864, 1984, 3 pages. |
Pennant et al., “Comparison of the Endotracheal Tube and Laryngeal Mask in Airway Management by Paramedical Personnel,” Anesth. Analog, pp. 531-534, 1992. |
Pippin et al., “Long-term tracheal intubation practice in the United Kingdom,” Anaesthesia, vol. 38, pp. 791-795, 1983. |
Raeder et al., “Tracheal tube cuff pressures,” Anaesthesia, vol. 40, pp. 444-447, 1985. |
Response to Complaint in LMA Deutschland Gmbh v. AMBU (Deutschland) Gmbh, dated Feb. 10, 2006. |
Rieger et al., “Intracuff Pressures Do Not Predict Laryngopharyngeal Discomfort after Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anesthesiology, vol. 87, No. 1, Jul. 1997, pp. 63-67. |
Seegobin et al., “Endotracheal cuff pressure and tracheal mucosal blood flow: endoscopic study of effects of four volume cuffs,” British Medical Journal, vol. 288, Mar. 1984, pp. 965-968. |
Willis, et al., “Tracheal tube cuff pressure,” Anaesthesia, vol. 43, pp. 312-314, 1988. |
Worthington, et al., “Proceedings of the Anaesthetic Research Society, Leeds Meeting, Mar. 31-Apr. 1, 1995,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995, 75:228P. |
Wynn et al., “Tongue Cyanosis after Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion,” Anesthesiology, vol. 80, No. 6, Jun. 1994. |
International Search Report in PCT/AU2010/001024 dated Oct. 11, 2010. |
Benumof, “The Glottic Apeture Seal Airway,” Anesthesiology, vol. 88, No. 5, pp. 1219-1226, May 1998. |
Brimacombe, “Anatomy,” Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia—Principles and Practice, Chapter 3, pp. 73-101, 2005. |
Ishimura et al., “Impossible Insertion of the Laryngeal Mask Airway and Oropharyngeal Axes,” Anesthesiology, vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 867-869, Oct. 1995. |
McIntyre, “History of Anaesthesia—Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal airways: | (1880-1995),” Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 629-635, 1996. |
Miller, “A Proposed Classification and Scoring System for Supraglottic Sealing Airways: A Brief Review,” Anesth. Analg., vol. 99, pp. 1553-1559, 2004. |
Verghese et al., “Clincial assessment of the single use laryngeal mask airway—the LMA-Unique,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 80, pp. 677-679, 1998. |
International Organization for Standardization, “Anaesthetic and respiratory equipment—Supralaryngeal airways and connectors,” ISO 11712, First edition, pp. 1-27, May 15, 2009. |
Office Action dated Mar. 22, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/981,829 (US 2014/0034060). |
Brimacombe, “Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia-Principles and Practice,” 2nd edition, Chapters 1-22, Appendices A-C, Saunders/Elsevier Limited, 2005. |
Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,864 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,528,897). |
Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,864 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,528,897). |
Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,864 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,528,897). |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,864 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,528,897). |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 6, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,864 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,528,897). |
Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/981,829 (US 2014-0034060). |
Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/981,829 (US 2014-0034060). |
Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/981,829 (US 2014-0034060). |
Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,588 (US 2010/0059061). |
Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,558 (US 2010/0050061). |
Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/029,831 (US 2014/0087380). |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 11, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/029,831 (US 2014/0087380). |
Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,776 (US 2010/0089393). |
Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,558 (US 2010/0059061). |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 8, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,558 (US 2010/0059061). |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 1, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,776 (US 2010/0089393). |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 12, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/915,558 (US 2010/0059061). |
Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/254,594 (US 2012/0048279). |
Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/254,594 (US 2012/0048279). |
Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,776 (US 2010/0089393). |
Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/254,594 (US 2012/0048279). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170146419 A1 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13388864 | US | |
Child | 15361655 | US |