The present disclosure relates to a pressure locking device for drilling systems and components thereof, and more specifically, to a pressure locking device for holding downhole tools, such as measurement-while-drilling tools and the like, in position along a drill string while drilling a borehole in an earthen formation.
Boreholes are drilled thousands of feet underground for oil, gas, and other purposes. Drilling is accomplished by utilizing a series of connected pipes called a drill string. At the bottom of the string is a drill bit. The drill bit turns either by rotating the drill string or by a fluid, typically referred to as “drilling mud” that travels through an internal passage in the drill string. The drilling mud powers a motor near drill bit. The drill bit advances into the earth, thereby forming the borehole. A high pressure fluid, the drilling mud, is pumped down through internal passage of the drill string to the drill bit so as to lubricate the drill bit and to flush cuttings from its path. The drilling fluid F then flows to the surface through an annular passage formed between the drill string and the surface of the bore hole.
Data regarding the downhole drilling operation and environment is often transmitted from sensors located near the drill bit to the surface while the borehole is being drilled. Obtaining and transmitting drilling data between sensors located downhole and the surface is commonly referred to as measurement-while-drilling (MWD) and logging-while-drilling (LWD), which are collectively referred to as MWD throughout this document. Often, a transmitter and sensor package is part of an MWD tool. Typical data includes formation characteristics, borehole direction and inclination, and various other drilling parameters.
MWD tools can be a fixed-mount tools that are permanently fixed to the drill collar, or retrievable tools configured so that all or part of the MWD tool can be retrieved from the drill collar as needed. A fixed mount tool has some advantages, but a drawback is that if the drill string becomes permanently stuck, the expensive MWD tool is also stuck. A retrievable tool, in contrast, can be pulled out of the drill string even if the drill string is permanently stuck and lost. Retrievable tools typically include a probe, sometimes called a stinger, that seats in a mule shoe mounted inside a section of drill collar located toward the drill bit. The mule shoe includes a socket into which the probe inserted. In conventional retrievable tools, grooves align the probe in the socket of the mule shoe to orient the probe. In the event the drill string gets stuck, a wireline is used to lower a device which can attach to a spear point mounted on the uphole end of the retrievable MWD tool. When the wireline is attached to the retrievable MWD tool, the tool can be pulled up to the surface through the internal passage of the drill string.
Drilling can cause the drill bit to move up and down violently against the earthen formation. In order for accurate information to be provided by the MWD tool, the probe should be seated properly and securely in the mule shoe. If the probe is not properly seated, the sensors might make erroneous measurements due to the axial movement of the drill bit. For example, if the probe is not seated properly in the mule shoe, a directional sensor in the MWD tool may be come misaligned with axis of the drill string and the formation, and in this way provide incorrect information, which can result in steering the borehole in a wrong direction. Some minor up and down movement of the probe is acceptable during drilling. However, even in vertical boreholes where the weight of the MWD tool tends to keep the probe in place, some means for holding the tool in place relative to the socket is desirable to minimize axial vibration which can result in inaccurate measurements, damage to sensors, and premature wear and failure. While the probe should be properly seated in the mule shoe across a range of operating conditions downhole, it should also be easy to release the probe when necessary for retrieval.
Previous designs have utilized latching mechanisms to overcome the issue of keeping downhole equipment securely in place. See for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,896,050, assigned to the APS Technology, Inc. However, latches have reliability concerns because they can be made of small moving parts exposed to fast flowing, abrasive drilling fluid F. In addition, the shock forces can be large, and latch mechanisms are subject to breaking. Accordingly, there is opportunity for improvement in the art.
A system and method of holding drilling equipment in place during drilling operation which utilizes the differential pressure between drilling fluid inside and outside the drill string. In this regard, during drilling, drilling fluid is pumped down the inside of the drill string through the drill bit. The drilling fluid is propelled by pumps at the surface and flows under high pressure inside the drill string. The drilling fluid F moves past the drilling equipment and through or around a socket, past the mud motor if installed, and then to the drill bit. The drilling fluid F is then forced through nozzles in the drill bit and makes a return trip uphole on the outside of the drill string. The region outside of the drill string, i.e., the annulus, and the drilling fluid F in the annulus is considered downstream of the drilling equipment, motor, drill bit, and anything inside of the drill string. The pressure of the drilling fluid drops as it moves downstream, as is the case in any non-compressible flow system. And, when fluid flows through a restriction, its velocity increases and dynamic pressure decreases.
Once the drilling fluid F is past the drill bit, the fluid is under lower pressure in the annulus of the bore hole than the pressure inside of the drill string because of the pressure drop across the drill bit and other structure and devices at the borehole end. The drilling equipment located within the drill string and under high pressure is exposed to the low pressure fluid in the annulus by a channel or port that extends through the drill string and into the annulus. The difference in pressure causes the high pressure side to push toward the low pressure side causing the equipment to seat firmly in the socket. The force that pushes the equipment down exceeds the majority of the forces that tend to unseat the tool upwards while drilling.
An embodiment of present disclosure includes a system having a drill collar segment configured to disposed along the drill string, the drill collar segment including a passage configured for high pressure drilling fluid to flow through along a downhole direction when the drill collar segment is disposed along the drill string. The drill collar segment configured such that the high pressure fluid drops in pressure across a downhole end of the drill string, thereby resulting in lower pressure drilling fluid on an exterior surface of the drill collar segment. The system includes a mule shoe coupled to the drill collar segment. The mule shoe includes a socket. The system includes a probe configured to be positioned in the passage of the drill collar segment. The probe has a downhole end configured to be disposed in the socket. The system includes at least one sealing element coupled to one of the probe or the mule shoe so as define a seal between the probe and the mule shoe. The sealing element defines an uphole side of the probe and a downhole side of the probe. The uphole side of probe is in communication with the high pressure drilling fluid and the downhole side being in communication with the low pressure drilling fluid, whereby the pressure differential between the high pressure fluid and the low pressure fluid applies a force to the probe in the downhole direction.
Another embodiment of present disclosure includes a system having a drill collar segment configured to disposed along the drill string. The drill collar segment defines an inner surface, an outer surface, an uphole end, a downhole end spaced from the uphole end in the downhole direction, and a passage that extends from the uphole end to the downhole end in the downhole direction. The passage is configured to allow a fluid to flow therethrough. The system includes a downhole tool configured to be positioned in the passage. The downhole tool has a first end and a second end that is opposed to the first end along the downhole direction. The system includes a receptacle member supported by the inner surface of the drill collar segment. The receptacle member defines a socket configured to engage the second end of the downhole tool, and a channel that is open to the socket and to an outer surface the drill collar segment. Engagement between the second end of the downhole tool and the socket forms a seal between the downhole tool and the receptacle member. When fluid flows through the passage during the drilling operation, a differential pressure between a high pressure fluid at an uphole side of the seal and a lower pressure fluid on a downhole side of the seal applies a force to the downhole tool in the downhole direction, so as to retain the downhole tool in the receptacle member.
An embodiment of present disclosure includes a method for drilling a borehole in an earthen formation with a drill string. The method includes rotating the drill string so as to drill the borehole. The method includes pumping a fluid through the passage of the drill string in the downhole direction, wherein the fluid undergoes a pressure drop at the downhole end of the drill string such that fluid in the passage of the drill string is under higher pressure than the fluid outside the drill string. The method also includes, during the pumping step, exposing an uphole portion of the downhole tool to the higher pressure fluid and a downhole portion of the downhole tool to the lower pressure fluid, thereby seating the downhole tool in a receptacle member attached to the drill string in the passage.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the present application, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purposes of illustrating the present application, there is shown in the drawings illustrative embodiments of the disclosure. It should be understood, however, that the application is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown. In the drawings:
Referring to
As best illustrated in
The drilling system 1 can create a significant differential pressures between drilling fluid F in the internal passage 12 of the drill string 6 and the drilling fluid F located outside the drill string 6 in the annular passage 13. In typical drilling systems, a pump will pump drilling fluid F, known as drilling mud, downward through the internal passage 12 in the drill string 6. When the drilling mud exits the drill string 6 at the drill bit 14, the returning drilling fluid F flows upward toward the surface 4 through the annular passage 13 formed between the drill string 6 and a wall (not numbered) of the borehole 2. The combination of the pump outlet pressure and the pressure head yields high pressure drilling fluid F in passage 12 of the drill string 6 near the downhole end of the borehole 2, as is well known in the art. A pressure drop across the drill bit 14, mud motor (if present), and other downhole equipment yields a pressure on the outside of drill string 6 at the borehole end near the drill bit 14 that is significantly less than pressure of the drilling fluid F within the drill string 6. For instance, using fluid under high pressure to rotate a shaft in the downhole motor accomplishes work resulting in a pressure drop as the drilling fluid F is forced through the downhole motor. Flow under high pressure forced through the reduced area of the nozzles in the drill bit 14 results in a further decrease in pressure and increase in velocity. Fluid pressure in the annulus passage 13 after passing through the downhole motor and drill bit 14 is considerably lower than the fluid pressure of the fluid before the fluid has passed through the downhole motor and drill bit. It should be appreciated that the particular downhole motor and drill bit nozzle design can result in different pressure drops. In some cases, the pressure drop across the downhole motor is about equal to the process drop across the drill bit 14. In any event, the pressure locking device 20 is configured so that differential pressure between drilling fluid F in the internal passage 12 of the drill string 6 and the drilling fluid F located outside the drill string 6 in the annular passage 13 causes the MWD tool 40 to fully seat in the receptacle member 70 as will be further detailed below.
Continuing with
Turning to
As shown in
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the MWD tool 40 illustrated in
During a drilling operation, the MWD tool 40 is positioned at a downhole location of the drill string 6 toward the drill bit 14. More specifically, the MWD tool 40 is held in place in the internal passage 12 by the second end 56, or probe 60, of the MWD tool 40 being seated in the receptacle member 70. In order for accurate data to be transmitted to the surface 4, it is preferred to have the MWD tool 40 seated securely in the receptacle member 70. The probe 60 is configured to position and orient the MWD tool 40 in the drill collar segment 34a as the probe 60 is being inserted inside the receptacle member 70. The probe 60 may also include additional sensors for sensing downhole parameters concerning the drilling fluid F and of the formations surrounding the drill string. Further, the probe may also serve as a conduit, such an electrical conduit, or as a path for wires, to convey sensed parameters to elsewhere in the MWD tool 40.
Referring to
The probe 60 can include at least one sealing element 64a. The sealing element 64a, or the plurality of sealing elements 64a and 65a as illustrated in
Continuing with
Continuing with
Referring to
Continuing with
The mule shoe 70 illustrated in
Referring to
The mule shoe 70 is configured to allow the high pressure drilling fluid F to flow along the outer socket surface 75. During drilling operations, when the mule shoe 70 is supported by and located within the drill string 6, the drilling fluid F in the internal passage 12 may flow through the drill string 6, around mule shoe 70 along the outer socket surface 75, through the passage 77, through the drill bit 14, and then reverse direction in the annular passage 13.
Turning now to
As best illustrated in
Continuing with
Accordingly, when drilling fluid F is being pumped through drill string 6 to create a differential pressure across sealing elements 64a,65a that acts to seat the probe 60 into mule shoe 70. But when the pumps are not in operation, the flow of drilling fluid F stops and the pressure equalizes across sealing element 64a, 65a. Even though the hydrostatic pressure is high, there is no downward force created by the pressure, which enables the probe to be removed by conventional means, such as a wireline that can be attached to a spar (not shown in the figures) on the uphole side of probe side, will be understood by persons familiar with retrievable MWD tools.
A pressure locking device 20, including the probe 60, sealing elements, and receptacle member 70 has been described with reference to MWD tools. However, in alternative embodiments, the pressure locking device 20 can be used with any downhole tool configured or positioned inside a drill string. Further, downhole tools may or may not have a “probe” as that term is understood in the oil and gas drilling arts. Accordingly, the probe as described herein can a downhole member or downhole component of a downhole tool. Further, the present disclosure has described that the probe 60 includes sealing elements 64a, 65a, an electrical contact component 66a, and a locking element 67a seated in respective grooves. In alternative embodiments, the inner surface 78i of the receptacle member 70 can define annular grooves (not shown) and the sealing elements 64a and 65a can be disposed in the grooves of the receptacle member 70 so as to create a seal between the probe 60 and the receptacle member 70. Further, either or both of the locking element and electrical contact element 66a can be supported by the inner surface 78i of the receptacle member 70. In addition, the recess 68 in the probe 60 is optional. In embodiments having no recess 68, low pressure fluid may communicate with the downhole side of the sealing elements 64a, 65b via the channel 80. Alternatively, the inner opening 82 of a channel may open to a portion of the socket 76 located closest to the bottom end 71 of the mule shoe 70 to expose the downhole-most part 96 of downhole end 61 of the probe 60 to the low pressure fluid. In the embodiment shown in the figures or the alternative embodiments described in this paragraph, the pressure differential across sealing elements 64a and/or 65a seats the MWD tool 40 securely in place. In still other embodiments, the downhole tool or MWD tool can include a structure that defines a socket, similar the socket 76, and the drill collar segment 34 can support an elongated member, similar to the probe 60, that extends in the uphole direction and is supported in the passage 12. In such an embodiment, the sealing elements can be disposed in the socket or on the elongated member.
The present disclosure is not limited to the particular embodiments shown or described. For merely a few examples, the present disclosure is not limited to sealing elements in the form of rings that define the seal between the high pressure fluid and the low pressure fluid. Rather, any seals or like structure is contemplated. The mule shoe may include multiple channels (analogous to channel 80) and opening to expose a downhole side of the MWD tool to low pressure fluid.
And generally, the disclosure is described herein using a limited number of embodiments, these specific embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure as otherwise described and claimed herein. Modification and variations from the described embodiments exist. More specifically, the following examples are given as a specific illustration of embodiments of the claimed disclosure. It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the specific details set forth in the examples.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2225668 | Subkow | Dec 1940 | A |
3394939 | A Mastro | Jul 1968 | A |
3411584 | Sizer | Nov 1968 | A |
3518609 | Fontenot | Jun 1970 | A |
3765494 | Kielman, Jr. | Oct 1973 | A |
3765690 | Sievenpiper | Oct 1973 | A |
4066128 | Davis | Jan 1978 | A |
4130162 | Nelson | Dec 1978 | A |
4216536 | More | Aug 1980 | A |
4348672 | Givler | Sep 1982 | A |
4416330 | Merritt | Nov 1983 | A |
RE31613 | Lienhard | Jun 1984 | E |
4566702 | Traub | Jan 1986 | A |
4630243 | MacLeod | Dec 1986 | A |
4689775 | Scherbatskoy | Aug 1987 | A |
4825946 | Schnatzmeyer | May 1989 | A |
4893823 | Strouse et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4980682 | Klein | Dec 1990 | A |
5045795 | Gianzero | Sep 1991 | A |
5065099 | Sinclair | Nov 1991 | A |
5163692 | Schofield et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5189415 | Shimada | Feb 1993 | A |
5326112 | Paykin | Jul 1994 | A |
5328685 | Janchitraponvej | Jul 1994 | A |
5463313 | Berkan | Oct 1995 | A |
5606260 | Giordano | Feb 1997 | A |
5767667 | Shafie | Jun 1998 | A |
5782261 | Becker | Jul 1998 | A |
5818352 | McClure | Oct 1998 | A |
5955884 | Payton et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959548 | Smith | Sep 1999 | A |
5979904 | Baisells | Nov 1999 | A |
6018602 | Smith | Jan 2000 | A |
6111409 | Edwards | Aug 2000 | A |
6364035 | Brune et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6367323 | Camwell | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411078 | Nakagawa | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417666 | Mercer | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456059 | Blakely | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470274 | Mollison et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6531871 | Hay et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6657597 | Rodney | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6712362 | Krappmann et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6810955 | Roth | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6896050 | Biglen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6915848 | Thomeer | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6915849 | Nuth | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7151466 | Gabelmann | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7170423 | Wisler | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7178608 | Mayes | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7204309 | Segura | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7213607 | De Almeida | May 2007 | B2 |
7243028 | Young | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7296639 | Millar et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7327144 | Brune | Feb 2008 | B2 |
RE40321 | Srnka | May 2008 | E |
7480207 | Marsh | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7506699 | Harvey | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7506700 | Harvey | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7681663 | Cobern | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7775301 | Brune et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7832503 | Sand et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8069931 | Hooks | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8096559 | Cook | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8154420 | Petrovic | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8240672 | Grace et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8284073 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8400326 | Codazzi | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8463548 | Gies | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8464798 | Nadkrynechny | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8474548 | Young | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8891811 | Alattar | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8952700 | Wisler | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9116255 | Eick | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9196411 | Parsche | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9234981 | Rodney et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9274243 | Chau et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9291049 | Switzer et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9303465 | Pare | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9328603 | Pope | May 2016 | B2 |
9453397 | Dowling et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9562987 | Guner et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9575201 | Wang | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20020170711 | Nuth | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030184488 | Smith | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229450 | Strickland | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004553 | Rodney | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040035575 | Roth | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040100256 | Fickert | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104047 | Peter | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040156264 | Gardner | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169367 | Sutherland | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040226749 | Biglin, Jr. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251897 | Pedersen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257061 | George de Buda | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016771 | Mayes | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050046587 | Wisler | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050061369 | De Almeida | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050140373 | Li | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060035591 | Young et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041795 | Gabelmann | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060066292 | Tadatsu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060118298 | Millar | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060124354 | Witte | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060202852 | Peter et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070052407 | Hausperger | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079988 | Konschuh | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070239403 | Hornbostel | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247328 | Petrovic | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251729 | Sand et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080048655 | Hausperger | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080224707 | Wisler et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080265892 | Snyder | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090261986 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100033187 | Reiderman | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052689 | Hall | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100134112 | Zhang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100258351 | Hooks | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262370 | Bittar et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100270491 | Faas | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110001633 | Lam et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110006753 | Yu | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110017512 | Codazzi | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110061864 | Umphries | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110140369 | Lenhert | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110253382 | Nadkrynechny | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110304220 | Whitehead | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120062215 | Ide | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120091996 | Koch | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120126992 | Rodney et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120286478 | Uesugi | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130009646 | Simon | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014992 | Sharp | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130043661 | Binder et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130077440 | Cao et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130140019 | Pare | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169278 | Bittar et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130176139 | Chau et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130234717 | Wang | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241561 | Allen | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241742 | Contant et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130265171 | Hay | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130278252 | Sasaki | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130320940 | Dimitrovski | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130337650 | Lee et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140032116 | Guner | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140041863 | Dowling | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140048332 | Schmidt | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140110395 | Parsche | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140240140 | Switzer et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150053485 | Altimas et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150075770 | Fripp | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150145687 | Roberts | May 2015 | A1 |
20150218938 | Weisbeck et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150247401 | Cramer | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150276970 | Wu | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150285061 | Wu | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150293254 | Wang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150337650 | Balogh | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160003035 | Logan et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160138388 | Chau et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160146000 | Logan et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160187523 | Sanmartin | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160245068 | David Cramer | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160290066 | Frith | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160369615 | Cune | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2760931 | Jun 2013 | CA |
2786471 | Jul 2013 | CA |
0911484 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0913555 | May 1999 | EP |
0922836 | Jun 1999 | EP |
2008899 | Jun 1979 | GB |
WO2006028701 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2012175658 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2015077552 | May 2015 | WO |
WO 2015134361 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO 2015179331 | Nov 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/066801; Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 21, 2015, 16 pgs. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/018249; Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated May 21, 2015, 10 pgs. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/031467; Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 19, 2015, 8 pgs. |
Velasco-Quesada, Novel Advances in Microsystems Technologies and Their Applications, CRCPress, Chapter 21, Aug. 2013, p. 348, 3 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160245068 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |