1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to the hydraulic control of downhole tools and, particularly to methods and devices for determining the state of such hydraulically-actuated tools.
2. Description of the Related Art
Production of hydrocarbons from a downhole well requires subsurface production equipment to control the flow of hydrocarbon fluid into the production tubing. Typical flow control equipment might include a sliding sleeve valve assembly or other valve assembly wherein a sleeve is moved between open and closed positions in order to selectively admit production fluid into the production tubing. The valve assembly is controlled from the surface using hydraulic control lines or other methods.
In a simple system, a sleeve valve would be moveable between just two positions or states: fully opened and fully closed. More complex systems are provided where a well penetrates multiple hydrocarbon zones, and it is desired to produce from some or all of the zones. In such a case, it is desirable to be able to measure and control the amount of flow from each of the zones. In this instance, it is often desirable to use flow control devices that may be opened in discrete increments, or states, in order to admit varying amounts of flow from a particular zone. Several “intelligent” hydraulic devices are known that retain information about the state of the device. Examples of such devices include those marketed under the brand names HCM-A In-Force™ Variable Choking Valve and the In-Force™ Single Line Switch, both of which are available commercially from Baker Oil Tools of Houston, Tex. These devices incorporate a sliding sleeve that is actuated by a pair of hydraulic lines that move the sleeve within a balanced hydraulic chamber. A “J-slot” ratchet arrangement is used to locate the sleeve at several discrete positions that permit varying degrees of fluid flow through the device.
Because these devices are capable of being controlled between multiple states, or positions, determination and monitoring of the positions of the devices is important. To date, position determination has been accomplished by measurement of the amount of hydraulic fluid that is displaced within the control lines as the device is moved between one position and the next. Measuring displacement of hydraulic fluid will provide an indication of the particular state that the tool has moved to because differing volumes of fluid are displaced during each movement. In some instances, however, such as with a subsea pod, it may not be possible to measure fluid volume. Also, the fluid volume measurement technique may be inaccurate at times for a variety of reasons, including leaks within the hydraulic control lines and connections or at seals that lead to fluid loss, which leads to an incorrect determination of position. In addition, the hydraulic control lines may expand under pressure (storage effects) or become distorted due to high temperatures within the wellbore. In long lines, the additional storage volume in such expansion/distortion may be larger than the normally small differences in fluid volume between different movements and lead to inaccurate determinations of position.
The present invention addresses some of the problems of the prior art noted above.
In one aspect of the present invention, a flow control device for use in a wellbore to allow flow of formation fluid into the wellbore comprises a valve member adapted to move when disposed in the wellbore. A fluid line supplies a working fluid under pressure to move the valve member to allow the fluid to flow into the wellbore. A sensor in the wellbore, and associated with the fluid line, provides an indication of a position of the valve member.
In another aspect, a downhole flow control device comprises a hydraulically-actuated sleeve valve that is operable between a first position wherein the valve is in a first fluid flow state and a second position wherein the valve is in a second fluid flow state. A hydraulic control line is operably associated with the sleeve valve for supplying hydraulic fluid to operate the valve between states. A downhole pressure sensor operably associated with the hydraulic control line detects fluid pressure therein to provide an indication of the state of the sleeve valve.
In another aspect, a method of determining a state of a flow control tool within a wellbore comprises supplying fluid under pressure to the flow control tool to move a flow control member of the tool into the state. Pressure of the supplied fluid is detected downhole. The state of the flow control device is determined from the detected pressure of the supplied fluid.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a method of determining the state of a flow control tool within a wellbore comprises detecting a fluid flow downhole within a hydraulic supply conduit in fluid communication with the flow control tool. The state of the flow control tool is determined from the detected fluid flow.
For detailed understanding of the present invention, references should be made to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like elements have been given like numerals, wherein:
A production tubing string 22 is disposed within the well 10 from a wellhead 24 and includes flow control devices 26, 28 located proximate the zones 14, 16, respectively. Packers 30 isolate the flow control devices 26, 28 within the well 10. In one embodiment, each of the flow control devices 26, 28 is a sliding sleeve flow control device that is capable of more than two operable positions, also called open/closed states. Examples of suitable flow control devices for this application include those marketed under the brand names HCM-A In-Force™ Variable Choking Valve and the In-Force™ Single Line Switch, both of which are available commercially from Baker Oil Tools of Houston, Tex.
A monitoring and control station 32 is located at the wellhead 24 for operational control of the flow control devices 26, 28. Hydraulic control lines, generally shown at 34 extend from monitoring and control station 32 down to the flow control devices 26, 28. The monitoring and control station 32 is of a type known in the art for control of hydraulic downhole flow control devices, and is described in more detail below in reference to
Hydraulic control lines 34a and 34b are operably secured to the housing 38 to provide fluid communication into and out of each of the fluid receiving chambers 52,54. As those skilled in the art will recognize, the sliding sleeve 44 may be axially moved within the housing 38 by transmission of hydraulic fluid into and out of the fluid receiving chambers 52,54. For example, if it is desired to move the sleeve 44 downwardly with respect to the housing 38, hydraulic fluid is pumped through the control line 34a and into only the upper fluid receiving chamber 52. This fluid exerts pressure upon the upper face of the piston 50, urging the sleeve 44 downwardly. As the sleeve 44 moves downwardly, hydraulic fluid is expelled from the lower fluid receiving chamber 54 through control line 34b toward the surface of the well 10. Conversely, if it is desired to move the sleeve 44 upwardly with respect to the housing 38, hydraulic fluid is pumped through control line 34b into the lower fluid receiving chamber 54 to exert pressure upon the lower side of the piston portion 50. As the sleeve 44 moves upwardly, hydraulic fluid is expelled from the upper fluid receiving chamber 52 through the control line 34a.
In one embodiment, see
Axial movement of the sliding sleeve 44 by movement of piston 50 as described above moves the abutting lug sleeve 62 axially within the ratchet assembly sub 56. As this occurs, the upper lug 64 is moved consecutively among lug positions 64a, 64b, 64c, 64d, 64e, 64f, 64g, 64h, 64i, and 64j. Finally, the upper lug 64 moves to its final lug position 64k, which corresponds to a fully closed position, or state, for the sliding sleeve assembly sub 36. Additionally, the lower lug 66 is moved consecutively through lug positions 66a-66k. When lug 66 is located adjacent upper shoulder 76, the fluid ports 46 are aligned with fluid openings 42 to provide a fully open flow condition. It can be seen that abutment of the lower lug 66 upon each of the lower shoulders 72a,72e results in a progressively lower axial position for the lug sleeve 62 with respect to the housing members 58, 60. These different axial positions result in different flow control positions or states for the sliding sleeve 44, by varying the amount of axial overlap of fluid opening 42 with flow ports 46 (see
By the proper selection of the stair-step shoulders of FIGS. 3A,B, the length of time (x) for the level pressure associated with sleeve movement (portion 92 of
Referring to
Monitoring and control station 32 functionally comprises a hydraulic system for powering the flow control system and suitable electronics and computing equipment for powering downhole sensor 82 and detecting, processing, and displaying signals therefrom. In one embodiment, monitoring and control station 32 provides feedback control using signals from sensor 82 to control the hydraulic supply system. Monitoring and control station 32 comprises pump controller 201 controlling the output of pump 202 having fluid supply 203. Fluid from pump 202 powers downhole tool 26. In addition, processor 204, having memory 205 is associated with circuits 206 to provide power and an interface with sensor 82. Signals from sensor 82 are received by circuits 206 and then transmitted to processor 204. Processor 204, acting according to programmed instructions, provides a record and/or storage of the pressure vs. time of from sensor 82 using hard copy 207, display 208, and mass storage 209. In one embodiment, the length of time (x) associated with each sleeve movement, as described previously, may be stored in memory 205. The measured length of time (x) is compared to the stored signatures and the sleeve position determined based on the comparison. In another embodiment, the pressure profile for each movement is stored in memory 205 and a measured profile is compared to those in memory to determine the sleeve position. Alternatively, manual controls 200 may be operator controlled to operate the hydraulic system.
While described herein as a system having dual hydraulic control lines and a balanced piston, it will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that the present system is intended to encompass a single hydraulic line system utilizing a piston having a spring return capability.
Those of skill in the art will recognize that numerous modifications and changes may be made to the exemplary designs and embodiments described herein and that the invention is limited only by the claims that follow and any equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/576,202, filed Jun. 1, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4174729 | Roark et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4470430 | Lancaster | Sep 1984 | A |
5176164 | Boyle | Jan 1993 | A |
5499533 | Miller et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5547029 | Rubbo et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5925879 | Hay | Jul 1999 | A |
6046685 | Tubel | Apr 2000 | A |
6550322 | Sweetland et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6629564 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6668936 | Williamson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
20030132006 | Bussear et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040035577 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050263279 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60576202 | Jun 2004 | US |