This disclosure is directed to the field of pressure relief devices. More particularly, the disclosure relates to pressure relief vents, burst panels, rupture disks, or other devices designed to open during an explosion or in response to a predetermined pressure differential to reduce damage.
Pressure relief devices are commonly used as safety devices in systems containing pressurized fluids in gas or liquid form, or in contained systems containing volatile (e.g., flammable) conditions that may lead to a potentially dangerous increase in pressure. A pressure relief device will vent fluid from a system when the pressure in the system reaches a predetermined level—usually before it reaches an unsafe level. One category of pressure relief device—a membrane pressure relief device—includes, e.g., rupture disks and burst panels, also known as explosion vents.
It may be desirable for a membrane pressure relief device to exhibit resistance to reverse-pressure (e.g., a partial- or full-vacuum condition) in the event of a pressure drop within the enclosed system. One example of a rectangular flat-panel explosion vent may be provided with some resistance to reverse pressure by way of a diagonal (e.g., X-shaped) pattern of creases. Such creases may provide slight rigidity and slight vacuum resistance. Such vents are typically rated for pressures up to around 0.1 bar and have a vacuum resistance of 0.05 bar—less than the rated set pressure of the vent. Another example of a flat-panel explosion vent may be provided with some resistance to reverse pressure by way of “skeletal-type” bulges and/or rib-like features oriented parallel to a perimeter of the vent. Once again, such vents are typically rated for pressures up to around 0.1 bar and have a vacuum resistance of 0.05 bar—less than the rated set pressure of the vent.
The present disclosure recognizes a need for a membrane pressure relief device with improved vacuum resistance, particularly in a membrane pressure relief device having no secondary member as a vacuum support. The present disclosure provides one or more of these, and/or other, advantages.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several embodiments of the disclosure and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
Reference will now be made in detail to the present exemplary embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The explosion vent of
As illustrated in
Although the explosion vent 100 of
It is further contemplated that the foregoing features may be combined with each other in accordance with the present disclosure. As one example, a central ribbed feature (1201,
In addition to providing vacuum resistance, one or more of the features described above may provide improved vibration stability of a membrane pressure relief device. Vibration stability may be desirable to increase the longevity of a membrane pressure relief device. Additionally, or alternatively, one or more of the foregoing features may provide improved resistance to loading caused by wind, precipitation, snow accumulation, or other environmental causes.
In one embodiment, a membrane pressure relief device (e.g., the vent 100 illustrated in
While
It is further contemplated that a membrane pressure relief device may comprise more than one layer of material. In one example, an explosion vent (or a rupture disk) may be a compound vent having an inlet panel and an outlet panel, which may cooperate to enhance back-pressure resistance (or provide other advantages). One or more of the inlet and outlet panel may be provided with ribs (such as illustrated in
As noted above, in one embodiment, an explosion vent 100 such as illustrated in
A burst control tab may be attached to the explosion vent at or near the line of weakness. A burst control tab may be used to provide additional vacuum resistance. Additionally, or alternatively, a burst control tab may be used to control the pressure at which the explosion vent will open. Using such a tab may, for example, permit the use of different materials for the tab and vent body. In one embodiment, a vent body may be comprised of stainless steel, aluminum, or some other relatively low-cost material, while a tab may be comprised of more expensive material, such as Inconel. In another embodiment, a vent body may be comprised of a material whose properties may not lend themselves to reliable set pressure or longevity (e.g., plastics, composites, glass fiber, or coated carbon steel). Burst control in such an embodiment may be provided by a burst control tab made of a different material.
In another embodiment, an explosion vent such as illustrated in
A stress distribution feature may prevent the fragmentation of an explosion vent. If the opening of an explosion vent is violent enough to cause a tear to propagate from an endpoint of a line of weakness, then such a tear will encounter a stress distribution feature. The stress distribution feature provides a line of weaker material disposed in a direction transverse to line of weakness and the expected direction of material tearing. When the material tear reaches stress distribution feature, it is expected that any continued tearing will follow the direction of weaker material of stress distribution feature. Thus, any continued tearing of the material of the explosion vent will likely be in a direction that is transverse to the direction of line of weakness.
In this manner, a stress distribution feature may divert or deflect the direction of material tearing. Thus, a stress distribution feature may prevent the tear from propagating across a hinge area of an explosion vent. By reducing tear propagation across an unweakened hinge area, a stress distribution feature may prevent an explosion vent from fragmenting.
In addition, a small hole may be disposed at either end of a stress distribution feature. Each small hole may prevent the material of the explosion vent from tearing past the end of the stress distribution feature. If the force of the fluid on explosion vent causes the material of explosion vent to tear along a stress distribution feature, the tear may eventually reach the ends of stress distribution feature. A small hole at an end of stress distribution feature will distribute the tearing stresses over the circumference of the small hole. Thus, greater stresses will be required to continue the material tearing past the small hole. If the stresses are not great enough to continue tearing the material, the tear will end at the hole, thereby preventing fragmentation of explosion vent.
While several of the foregoing illustrated embodiments are directed to rib structure that extends across substantially an entire width of an explosion vent, the disclosure is not so limited. For example, it is contemplated that one or more ribs on an explosion vent (or rupture disk) may be truncated and extend only partially across a width of an explosion vent. In one embodiment, a plurality of ribs may join at a central convergence, while one or more of the ribs is truncated before reaching the periphery of the explosion vent. In another embodiment, one or more ribs may have a first extent near the periphery of the explosion vent and a second extent that stops short of the center of the explosion vent. It is contemplated that a combination of such truncated ribs (or a combination of truncated ribs with non-truncated ribs) may be used. It is further contemplated that an explosion vent may be provided with a plurality of ribs, wherein the ribs may be of different lengths or may be distributed in a non-uniform configuration.
While the foregoing illustrated embodiments are directed to explosion vents, the principles of the present disclosure may be applied to other membrane-type pressure relief devices, such as rupture disks. For example, the disclosed rib structures may be applied to a reverse-buckling rupture disk to achieve control of pressure resistance and burst pressure accuracy. In a rupture disk embodiment, for example, a rib structure may be combined with one or more lines of weakness to combine one or more performance attributes (e.g., burst pressure, burst pressure accuracy, vacuum/back pressure resistance, opening pattern, operating ratio, control of fragmentation).
Principles of the present disclosure also may be applied to a forward-acting rupture disk. For example, a forward-acting rupture disk may be provided with a rib structure to achieve vacuum resistance without the need for an additional vacuum or back-pressure support. Such a disk may be, for example, a plain solid metal disk (such as the “type B” disk offered commercially by BS&B Safety Systems Limited) or a scored solid metal disk (such as the scored “XT” and “GFN” disk). It is contemplated that ribs and lines of weakness may be crafted to combine one or more performance attributes (e.g., burst pressure, burst pressure accuracy, vacuum/back-pressure resistance, opening pattern, operating ratio, or control of fragmentation).
The previously discussed embodiments are disclosed as exemplary only and not as limiting the scope of the disclosure to the particular embodiments. Every embodiment disclosed above is not intended to be exclusive or stand alone. For example, it is contemplated that the particular features in any one embodiment can be substituted for, or replaced with, the features of any other embodiment (even though such a particular embodiment may not be explicitly disclosed).
Other embodiments of the disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosure herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only.
This application is a U.S. national phase entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 from PCT International Application No. PCT/US2020/049849, filed Sep. 9, 2020, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/897,626, filed Sep. 9, 2019, from both of which this application claims priority and both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/049849 | 9/9/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/050486 | 3/18/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3087643 | Smirra | Apr 1963 | A |
3109554 | Porter | Nov 1963 | A |
3612345 | Fike, Jr. | Oct 1971 | A |
3698598 | Wood | Oct 1972 | A |
3704807 | Lidgard | Dec 1972 | A |
3709239 | Morck, Jr. | Jan 1973 | A |
3881629 | Shaw | May 1975 | A |
4067154 | Fike, Jr. | Jan 1978 | A |
4612739 | Wilson | Sep 1986 | A |
4662126 | Malcolm | May 1987 | A |
4787180 | Robinson | Nov 1988 | A |
4819823 | Kadakia | Apr 1989 | A |
4905722 | Rooker et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5002085 | FitzGerald | Mar 1991 | A |
5197622 | Anderson | Mar 1993 | A |
5368180 | Farwell | Nov 1994 | A |
5678307 | Farwell | Oct 1997 | A |
6062599 | Forbes | May 2000 | A |
6607003 | Wilson | Aug 2003 | B1 |
8522808 | Ikeda | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20040172889 | Eijkelenberg | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050235584 | Farwell | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20100224603 | Modena | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20160018014 | Modena | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
209 164 685 | Jul 2019 | CN |
209 325 121 | Aug 2019 | CN |
2 136 879 | Sep 1984 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2020/049849, dated Dec. 17, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220356957 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62897626 | Sep 2019 | US |