The present disclosure relates to a submersible, and in particular to a pressure-resistant hull for a submersible and a design method therefor.
As the speed of ocean development continues to accelerate, and the depth of exploration from near sea to far sea continues to increase, various types of submersibles for the purpose of operations are increasing and developing rapidly. Their substantial utilizations include marine resource exploration and development, scientific research, and military exploration, salvage, and the like.
Submersibles are subjected to high pressure and low temperature in the deep sea, and the flow of seawater will also cause the sway of the submersibles. However, on the contrary, the various instruments and equipment equipped by the submersibles often need to work under room temperature and normal pressure, and the aquanauts' living conditions also need to be similar to that on the land surface. Therefore, stringent requirements on the pressure-resistant structure of the submersible are imposed. At present, the pressure-resistant hulls of deep-sea submersibles are mostly in a spherical structure. The spherical hull are a symmetrical hull in its entirety, which is highly sensitive to defects. Thus, a small initial defect will also cause a rapidly decrease of their bearing capacity. In addition, due to the monotonousness of the pressure-resistant hulls, the aquanauts and the instruments and equipment co-exist in the same space, the space utilization of which is unreasonable, which is disadvantageous for the manufacture and maintenance of the submersibles.
Objectives of the disclosure is as follows: in view of the above-mentioned deficiencies, the objectives of the present disclosure are to provide a pressure-resistant hull for a submersible, which can improve the bearing capacity of the hull, and optimize the space structure, and to provide a design method therefor.
The technical scheme is as follows: provided are a pressure-resistant hull for a submersible and a design method therefor, which includes unit hulls, reinforcing ribs, connecting channels, and closure heads. A plurality of the unit hulls are provided, which are sequentially strung together spiralling upward or spiralling downward. The closure heads are arranged on a unit hull at a first position and a unit hull at a last position respectively. An observation window are arranged on each unit hull respectively. Each adjacent two unit hulls in a horizontal direction are respectively connected by means of a reinforcing rib, and the at least two connecting channels are arranged between each adjacent two turns of unit hulls in a vertical direction.
Further, each unit hull is a hollow spherical hull-shaped structure, and an outer surface of the hollow spherical hull-shaped structure is provided with two connecting tangent planes arranged opposite to each other.
Further, two connecting channels are arranged between each adjacent two turns of the unit hulls, and are respectively arranged at an initial position and a middle position in a spiralling direction between the adjacent two turns of the unit hulls.
Preferably, two unit hulls at the first positions of each two adjacent turns are communicatively connected to each other through one connecting channel, and two unit hulls at the middle positions are communicatively connected to each other through the other connecting channel.
Further, a number of turns of the spiral arrangement of the unit hulls is at least three.
Further, each reinforcing rib is in an annular structure.
Further, a material of the unit hulls is Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic.
Further, a material of the unit hulls is ultra-high-strength steel.
Preferably, a strength of the unit hulls is greater than 1000 MPa.
A method for designing the above-mentioned pressure-resistant hull for the submersible includes the following steps.
In Step one, parameters for an equivalent annular hull are set.
The parameters for the equivalent annular hull include a rotation radius R, an annulus-section radius r, a working pressure Ps, an elastic modulus E and a Poisson's ratio μ.
In Step two, a thickness t of the pressure-resistant hull is calculated according to a jordan formula, a calculation formula of which is as follows:
In Step three, each unit hull is taken as a spherical hull, and parameters for the unit hulls are set.
The set parameters for the unit hulls include an elastic modulus E1, a Poisson's ratio μ1, a thickness t1 of the spherical hull, and a radius r1 of the spherical hull, where E1=E, μ1=μ, t1=t, and r1=r.
In Step four, parameters for the reinforcing ribs are designed.
The parameters for the reinforcing ribs include a radius R1 of a spiral line, and a pitch B of the spiral line, where R1=R, and B>2r.
In Step five, a rotation angle θ is calculated according to the spiral line equation, a calculation formula of which is:
where a=R1,
In Step six, a number n of the unit hulls per turn is calculated according to the rotation angle θ said in Step five, a calculation formula of which is:
In Step seven, an external diameter Dr and an inner diameter dr of the reinforcing ribs are calculated, a calculation formula of which is:
D
r=2(r1+t1) sin α, and
d
r
=D
r−2tr,
where the intersecting angle is α, 30°≤α≤70°, and a thickness of the reinforcing ribs is tr.
In Step eight, a width Lr of the reinforcing ribs is calculated through a radial displacement formula of the entire spherical hull under a hydrostatic pressure:
where Ps is a maximum working pressure of the pressure-resistant hull at a working depth,
E is the elastic modulus of the pressure-resistant hull material, which is equal to the value of the above-mentioned parameter, and
μ is the Poisson's ratio of the pressure-resistant hull material, which is equal to the value of the above-mentioned parameter;
a formula for the pressure exerted on the reinforcing ribs:
and
a displacement formula at the external diameter of the reinforcing rib:
and
in order to meet the requirements for a deformation coordination between the spherical hulls and the reinforcing ribs to realize δs=δr a calculation formula of Lr is:
The beneficial effects are that: compared with the prior art, the present disclosure has the advantages that adopting the spiral intersecting structure facilitates the organic adjustment of the number of the unit hulls, which has the better space utilization rate, and is advantageous to significantly expand the space. Compared with a cylindrical hull and a common multi-sphere intersecting hull, the extreme load has low sensitivity to defects, thereby increasing the axial rigidity and improving the total pressure resistance, which has high safety. By adopting the method of connecting multiple sections of the identical hulls through flanges, the process is relatively simple, and the manufacturing cost is reduced. At the same time, the process of the design method is provided, which facilitates the design of the submersible.
1. closure head; 2. unit hull; 3. reinforcing rib; 4. observation window; 5. connecting channel.
The present disclosure will be further clarified below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. It should be understood that those embodiments are only used to illustrate the present invention and not to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
As illustrated in
Each unit hull 2 is a hollow spherical hull-shaped structure, and the material of the unit hulls 2 is Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic or ultra-high-strength steel having the strength greater than 1000 MPa. The outer surface of the hollow spherical hull-shaped structure is provided with two connecting tangent planes arranged opposite to each other. A plurality of the unit hulls 2 are arranged, and are sequentially strung together spiralling upward or spiralling downward. The connecting tangent planes on two adjacent unit hulls 2 in the horizontal direction form a joint and are connected to each other by a reinforcing rib 3 at the joint. The reinforcing rib 3 is in an annular shape. The closure heads 1 are arranged on a unit hull 2 at a first position and a unit hull 2 at a last position respectively, which are configured to close the connecting tangent planes without a joint. The number of turns of the spiral arrangement of the unit hulls is at least three.
Each unit hull 2 is provided with an observation window 4 respectively. At least two connecting channels 5 are arranged between each adjacent two turns of the unit hulls 2 in a vertical direction. For example, two connecting channels 5 are provided. Two unit hulls 2 at the initial positions of adjacent two turns of the unit hulls in a vertical direction are connected to each other through one connecting channel 5, and two unit hulls 2 in the middle positions are connected through the other connecting channel 5.
Each unit hull of the pressure-resistant hull is a separate individual space, while the unit hulls on each turn (layer) are in communication with one another, so that each turn (layer) forms a larger individual space. Moreover, each turn (layer) is communicatively connected to each other through a connecting channel, so that each turn (layer) is in communication with one another, thereby forming the pressure-resistant hull.
The present pressure-resistant hull adopts the spiral intersecting structure to facilitate the organic adjustment of the number of the unit hulls, which has the better space utilization rate and is advantageous to significantly expand the space. Compared with a cylindrical hull and a common multi-sphere intersecting hull, the extreme load has low sensitivity to defects, thereby increasing the axial rigidity and improving the total pressure resistance, which has high safety. By adopting the method of connecting multiple sections of the identical hulls through flanges, the process is relatively simple, and the manufacturing cost is reduced.
As illustrated in
In Step one, parameters for an equivalent annular hull are set.
The parameters for the equivalent annular hull include a rotation radius R, an annulus-section radius r, a working pressure Ps, an elastic modulus E and a Poisson's ratio μ, where E=200 Gpa, μ=0.291, R=110 mm, r=40 mm, and Ps=4 Mpa.
Step two, a thickness t of the pressure-resistant hull is calculated according to a jordan formula, a calculation formula of which is as follows:
whereby t=1.5012 mm is solved.
In Step three, parameters for the unit hulls 2 are set.
The set parameters for the unit hulls includes an elastic modulus E1, a Poisson's ratio μ1, a thickness t of the spherical hull, and a radius r1 of the spherical hull, where E1=E, μ1=t1=t, and r1=r.
In Step four, parameters for the reinforcing ribs 3 are designed.
The parameters for the reinforcing ribs 3 include a radius R1 of a spiral line, a pitch B of the spiral line, where R1=R, and B>2r, taking B=85 mm.
In Step five, a rotation angle θ is calculated according to the spiral line equation, a calculation formula of which is:
where a=R1,
wherein the number of turns of the spiral arrangement is at least three, where θ=36°.
In Step six, the number n of the unit hulls 2 per turn is calculated according to the rotation angle θ said in Step five, a calculation formula of which is:
where when θ=36°, n=10.
In Step seven, an external diameter Dr and an inner diameter dr of the reinforcing ribs 3 are calculated, a calculation formula of which is:
D
r=2(r1+t1) sin α, and
d
r
=D
r−2tr
where the intersecting angle is α, the intersecting angle α is an important geometric parameter for a multi-sphere intersecting pressure-resistant hull. According to the experiment of Kloppel and Jungbluth, 30°≤α≤70°, and a thickness of the reinforcing ribs 3 is tr, where α=45°, and tr=15 mm, Dr=58.6915 mm, and dr=28.6915 mm are solved.
The buckling behavior of an entire spherical hull depends on t/R, while the buckling behavior of a multi-sphere intersecting pressure-resistant hull is further constrained by the annular reinforcing ribs. The thickness and length of the reinforcing ribs have a great influence on the multi-sphere intersection. Therefore, in order to ensure that the mechanical properties and stability of the spherical hulls of the multi-sphere intersecting pressure-resistant hull are not affected after the intersection, the design concept of deformation coordination shall be adopted when designing the multi-sphere intersection, the objective of which is to make the deformation of the part of the annular reinforcing ribs in the intersection part consistent with the deformation of the entire spherical hull.
In Step eight, a width Lr of the reinforcing ribs is calculated according to deformation coordination theory.
Through a radial displacement formula of the entire spherical hull under a hydrostatic pressure:
where Ps is a maximum working pressure of the pressure-resistant hull at a working depth,
E is the Elastic modulus of the pressure-resistant hull material, which is equal to the value of the above-mentioned parameter;
μ is the Poisson's ratio of the pressure-resistant hull material, which is equal to the value of the above-mentioned parameter;
a formula for the pressure exerted on the reinforcing ribs 3:
and
a displacement formula at the external diameter of the reinforcing ribs 3:
and in order to meet the requirements for a deformation coordination between the spherical hulls and the reinforcing ribs 3, to realise δs=δr, a calculation formula of Lr is:
The parameters are substituted to solve Lr=4.8689 mm.
Comparing the pressure-resistant hull of the present disclosure with a common spiral pressure-resistant hull:
1. Geometric Dimensions Selection:
The geometric dimensions of the pressure-resistant hull obtained from the above-mentioned design method, are shown in the following table:
For the common spiral pressure-resistant hull, still taking the spiral-line radius R2=R=110 mm, B=85 mm, the number of turns is 3 turns, and according to the principle of equal volume and thickness: t2=t1=1.5012 mm, and r2=35.7613 mm are solved.
The geometric dimensions of the common spiral pressure-resistant hull are shown in the following table:
2. Comparison of Bearing Capacities
In the embodiment, the bearing capacity of the pressure-resistant hull of the present disclosure solved by adopting the following method is obviously higher than that of the common spiral pressure-resistant hull, and the specific solution method is as follows.
The elastic modulus E of the pressure-resistant hull material=200 Gpa, the Poisson's ratio μ=0.291, and the buckling strength σs=680 Mpa.
In Step one, three-dimensional models are created, that is, three-dimensional surface modeling is performed by utilizing the three-dimensional modeling software SolidWorks for the pressure-resistant hull of the present disclosure and the common spiral pressure-resistant hull.
In Step two, meshes are divided, that is, the meshes of the three-dimensional models in Step one are divided by adopting the software ansa, where the meshes are in a quadrilateral shape, and the number of the meshes is about 10000.
In Step 3, the critical pressure is solved, that is, by adopting the software Abaqus and calculating through the Riks method, the meshes in each three-dimensional model in Step two are compared, where the boundary conditions are classical three-point boundary conditions, and the detailed solving parameters of the Riks method are set as follows: the initial increment is 0.2, the minimum increment is 10{circumflex over ( )}-50, the maximum increment is 0.5, and the maximum increment step number is 1000.
The bearing capacity calculation results are as follows:
It can be seen from the above table that the bearing capacity of the present disclosure is significantly higher than that of the common spiral pressure-resistant hull.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
202010891815.9 | Aug 2020 | CN | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2021/087776 | 4/16/2021 | WO |