Maintaining cavity pressure for certain sensors, e.g., pressure sensors, is desirable. Unfortunately, pressure sensors suffer from high pressure error drift, e.g., over 300 Pa, due to poor hermetic sealing of the pressure sensor fusion bond interface, which results in gas effect over time. Gas effect may result in a change in the cavity pressure, thereby causing error drift.
In some traditional systems, an oxide layer is used to reduce gas effect. Although the use of oxide layer improves hermicity nonetheless, gas effect still occurs.
Accordingly, a need has arisen to improve sensor hermetic seal. It is appreciated that in some embodiments, a material which equipped good hermeticity capability, such as metal or high density dielectric material, e.g., Nitride film, may be used as a barrier layer to improve cavity hermetic seal. Moreover, a trench may be used to isolate the core pressure cavity from the main oxide structure layer of the sensor. It is appreciated that improving the hermetic seal of the oxide interface may assist in further reducing gas effect. It is further appreciated that in some embodiments, the lateral wall(s) of the cavity may further be coated with a barrier layer such as metal or Nitride film, such Silicon nitride, etc., to further reduce the gas effect.
In some embodiments, a sensor includes a substrate, an oxide layer, a membrane, an electrode, and a trench. The oxide layer is disposed on the substrate. The membrane is positioned on the oxide layer. The membrane with the oxide layer and the substrate form an enclosed cavity therein. The membrane comprises a rigid portion and a deformable portion wherein the deformable portion of the membrane deforms responsive to stimuli. The oxide layer forms side walls of the cavity. The electrode is positioned on the substrate and within the cavity. The trench is formed in the oxide layer, and wherein the trench is covered with barrier material.
It is appreciated that in some embodiments the trench surrounds the cavity. The trench may be disposed between the cavity and an outer periphery of the sensor. According to some embodiments, the trench extends into the rigid portion of the membrane. The trench faces external environment and away from the substrate in some embodiments. It is appreciated that the barrier material comprises at least one of silicon nitride or metal layer.
In some embodiments a sensor includes a substrate, an oxide layer, a membrane, an electrode and a trench. The oxide layer may be disposed on the substrate. It is appreciated that the membrane may be positioned on the oxide layer. According to some embodiments the membrane, the oxide layer and the substrate form an enclosed cavity therein. In some embodiments, the membrane comprises a rigid portion and a deformable portion. The deformable portion deforms responsive to stimuli. The oxide layer forms side walls of the cavity. The electrode is positioned on the substrate and within the cavity. The trench is formed in the oxide layer and enclosed by the membrane and the substrate.
It is appreciated that the sensor may further include a vent hole formed within the rigid portion of the membrane. In some embodiments, the trench and the vent hole are aligned and connected to one another. It is appreciated that in some embodiments the vent hole is sealed by a cap and the cap is coated with a layer of barrier material.
In some embodiments a sensor includes a substrate, an oxide layer, a membrane, and an electrode. The oxide layer is disposed on the substrate. The membrane is positioned on the oxide layer. The membrane with the oxide layer and the substrate form an enclosed cavity therein. The oxide layer comprises an inner wall that extends laterally from the membrane to the substrate and forming side walls of the cavity. The oxide layer comprises an outer wall that extends laterally from the membrane to the substrate facing away from the cavity. The membrane comprises a rigid portion and a deformable portion wherein the deformable portion deforms responsive to stimuli. The inner wall or the outer wall is coated with a layer of barrier material. The electrode is positioned on the substrate and within the cavity.
It is appreciated that the layer of barrier material comprises at least one of silicon nitride or metal layer. In some embodiments the oxide layer is a high density plasma oxide layer. According to some embodiments, a top surface of the substrate is coated with another layer of barrier material.
It is appreciated that the sensor may further include a trench formed within the rigid portion of the membrane. It is appreciated that the trench may be sealed by a cap. It is appreciated that the trench may be coated with a layer of barrier material.
In some embodiments the sensor may further include a trench formed within the oxide layer. The sensor may also include a vent hole formed within the rigid portion of the membrane. In some embodiments, the trench and the vent hole are aligned and wherein the vent hole is capped.
These and other features and aspects of the concepts described herein may be better understood with reference to the following drawings, description, and appended claims.
Before various embodiments are described in greater detail, it should be understood that the embodiments are not limiting, as elements in such embodiments may vary. It should likewise be understood that a particular embodiment described and/or illustrated herein has elements which may be readily separated from the particular embodiment and optionally combined with any of several other embodiments or substituted for elements in any of several other embodiments described herein.
It should also be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing the certain concepts, and the terminology is not intended to be limiting. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood in the art to which the embodiments pertain.
Unless indicated otherwise, ordinal numbers (e.g., first, second, third, etc.) are used to distinguish or identify different elements or steps in a group of elements or steps, and do not supply a serial or numerical limitation on the elements or steps of the embodiments thereof. For example, “first,” “second,” and “third” elements or steps need not necessarily appear in that order, and the embodiments thereof need not necessarily be limited to three elements or steps. It should also be understood that, unless indicated otherwise, any labels such as “left,” “right,” “front,” “back,” “top,” “middle,” “bottom,” “beside,” “forward,” “reverse,” “overlying,” “underlying,” “up,” “down,” or other similar terms such as “upper,” “lower,” “above,” “below,” “under,” “between,” “over,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” “proximal,” “distal,” “lateral,” “forming,” “formation,” “reducing,” “applying,” “pulling,” and the like are used for convenience and are not intended to imply, for example, any particular fixed location, orientation, or direction. Instead, such labels are used to reflect, for example, relative location, orientation, or directions. It should also be understood that the singular forms of “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Terms such as “over,” “overlying,” “above,” “under,” etc. are understood to refer to elements that may be in direct contact or may have other elements in-between. For example, two layers may be in overlying contact, wherein one layer is over another layer and the two layers physically contact. In another example, two layers may be separated by one or more layers, wherein a first layer is over a second layer and one or more intermediate layers are between the first and second layers, such that the first and second layers do not physically contact.
It is appreciated that in some embodiments, the pressure sensor may be a monolithic device where a MEMS layer is deposited over silicon substrate. In some embodiments, the cavity can be formed in the MEMS substrate. It is appreciated that a portion of the MEMS substrate may be removed to form a deformable membrane from the silicon layer. The MEMS substrate is electrically connected to the circuitry on the silicon substrate. It is appreciated that the deformable membrane may be sensitive to stress in a pressure sensor. When a pressure sensor is mounted to a carrier and is electrically connected thereto, mechanical stress may be evoked and transmitted via solder balls to the MEMS substrate and specifically to stress sensitive structures of the pressure sensor such as the deformable membrane. According to some embodiments an absolute pressure sensor with a deformable membrane that has a separation between a cavity within the case of an absolute pressure sensor an essentially constant pressure and a port open to the outside of the sensor.
It is appreciated that in some embodiments, an oxide layer may be disposed between the substrate and the deformable membrane. However, in order to further reduce the gas effect, a barrier material e.g., Nitride film, SiNx or metal material, etc., may be used as a barrier layer. For example, it is appreciated that a lateral wall of the oxide layer disposed between the substrate and the membrane may be coated with barrier material in order to improve hermeticity.
According to one embodiment, a trench positioned in rigid portion of the membrane may be used to isolate the core pressure cavity from the main oxide structure layer of the sensor. It is appreciated that improving the hermetic seal of the fusion bond interface may assist in further reducing the gas effect. It is further appreciated that the isolation trench approach may be combined with the use of high density dielectric material coating the wall(s) of the oxide layer disposed between the deformable membrane and the substrate. Accordingly, hermetic can be improved.
The term “pressure sensor” as used herein designates any type of sensor measuring a parameter that is equal to or derived from the pressure of a fluid. In particular, the term designates relative (i.e. differential) as well as absolute pressure sensors, it also covers static as well as dynamic pressure sensors. Typical examples of applications of such sensors are e.g., in scientific instrumentation, meteorology, altitude measurement, sound recording, mobile or portable computers and phones etc. In the described embodiments, gas effect refers to outgassing as well as leakage over a period of time.
Referring now to
The substrate 2 may include a bulk material 23, e.g., silicon and a stack of oxide and metal layers on the bulk material 23. These layers may comprise electrical circuits for processing of electrical signals, and as such may also be denoted as CMOS layers. Specifically, the layers can include for example a plurality of SiO2 layers, metal or polysilicon layers, etc. The bulk material 23 may contain doped regions within the silicon. These components can form active circuitry, such as amplifiers, A/D converters or other analog and/or digital signal processing units. A top layer of the stack of layers may be a dielectric layer of silicon oxide and/or silicon nitride, e.g., SiNx, protecting the structures below it. It is appreciated that a dielectric barrier layer 122 such as SiNx may also improve cavity 41 hermeticity. In the present example, the bulk silicon 23 oxide and electrical processing circuit is collectively referred to as substrate 2. An electrode 243 comprising metal layers may be positioned on a top layer of the substrate 2 and it may be arranged at the bottom of the cavity 41 facing the deformable membrane 42D.
According to some embodiments, the membrane 42 may be formed by a doped conducting silicon layer and it may be arranged as a sealing lid over the cavity 41. As such, the deformable membrane 42D may be used as another electrode that generates electrical signals in response to external stimuli, e.g., pressure. Hence upon a change in pressure the deformable membrane 42D deflects and as such a distance between the two electrodes changes, which results in a change of the capacitance between the two electrodes. In other words, the sensing means may in one embodiment contain the deformable membrane 42D itself serving as one electrode and as such containing electrically conducting material. Moreover, the electrode 243 that is stationary may serve as another electrode and it may be arranged in the cavity 41 to allow sensing a capacitance between the two electrodes, e.g., electrode 243 and the deflectable membrane 42D. It is appreciated that the capacitance is dependent on the distance between the electrodes. For example, in case a medium such as air is applied to the cavity 41 at a defined pressure and a deflection of the deformable membrane 42D is evoked, a distance between the electrodes may change and result in a change in capacitance. In one embodiment, any of the electrodes may be formed from a metal layer or a polysilicon layer.
The via 112 is coated with a conductive layer 101. The conductive layer 101 connects the electrical circuit path 242 to outside the sensor. The electrical signal generated by the deformable membrane 42D, e.g., change in capacitance between the deformable membrane 42D and the electrode 243, responsive to pressure, e.g., change in pressure, is transmitted to substrate 2. It is appreciated that in some embodiments a dielectric layer such as barrier layer 102 may coat the conductive layer 101.
It is appreciated that in some embodiments, the membrane 42 and the substrate 2 sandwich a layer of dielectric material such as an oxide layer 104 may be present. It is appreciated that the oxide layer 104 may be a fusion bond oxide or a high density plasma (HDP) layer, HDP oxide, etc. In one example, the oxide layer 104 is positioned between the top surface of the substrate 2 and the membrane 42. In other words, the oxide layer 104 may form the side walls of the cavity 41 also referred to as the inner wall. In other words, the oxide layer 104 may form the side walls on the exterior of the device also referred to as outer wall. In some embodiments, the top layer of the substrate 2 is coated with a different dielectric such as barrier layer 122 in order to further improve hermiticity of the cavity in addition to protecting the underlying layers of the substrate 2.
Isolation trench 103 is formed within the rigid membrane 42D. The isolation trench 103 is formed in the membrane 42 outside the cavity 41. In one embodiment, the isolation trench 103 extends into the oxide layer 104. In one nonlimiting example, the isolation trench 103 extends from the rigid membrane 42D all the way through the oxide layer 104 and reaches the top layer, e.g., barrier layer 122, of the substrate 2. The isolation trench 103 is further configured to improve the hermeticity of the cavity 41.
In this embodiment, the isolation trench 103 is coated with a barrier material layer 105 layer to further assist in improving the hermeticity of the cavity 41. It is appreciated that in some embodiments, the isolation trench 103 may be covered with a metal material, i.e. capped or sealed, in order to further reduce the gassing effect. It is further appreciated that the cap may further be coated with a layer of barrier layer. It is appreciated that positioning the isolation trench in the exterior portion is for illustrative purposes and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments. For example, the isolation trench 103 may be positioned anywhere in the oxide layer 104 between the cavity 41 and the periphery of the device. It is appreciated that in some embodiments, the isolation trench 103 may be sealed with a cap, e.g., metal.
Referring now to
Referring now to
It is appreciated that the isolation trench 309 may extend into the rigid membrane 42R (similar to that of
While the embodiments have been described and/or illustrated by means of particular examples, and while these embodiments and/or examples have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the Applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the embodiments to such detail. Additional adaptations and/or modifications of the embodiments may readily appear, and, in its broader aspects, the embodiments may encompass these adaptations and/or modifications. Accordingly, departures may be made from the foregoing embodiments and/or examples without departing from the scope of the concepts described herein. The implementations described above and other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4625561 | Mikkor | Dec 1986 | A |
4730496 | Knecht et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4769738 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4949581 | Rud | Aug 1990 | A |
4975390 | Fujii et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5062302 | Peterson et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5113868 | Wise et al. | May 1992 | A |
5143583 | Marchessault et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155061 | O'Connor et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5277068 | Fukiura et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5332469 | Mastrangelo | Jul 1994 | A |
5334569 | Kisalus | Aug 1994 | A |
5335550 | Satou | Aug 1994 | A |
5343064 | Spangler et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344523 | Fung et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5395585 | Goldstein | Mar 1995 | A |
5407501 | Koen et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5470797 | Mastrangelo | Nov 1995 | A |
5525280 | Shukia et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5557972 | Jacobs et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5576251 | Garabedian et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578843 | Garabedian et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5683594 | Hocket et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5867256 | Van Rheeden | Feb 1999 | A |
5929498 | Ismail et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936164 | Sparks et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6038928 | Maluf et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6074890 | Yao et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6140144 | Najafi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6208019 | Tane et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6346742 | Bryzek et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6433427 | Wu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441451 | Ikeda et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6458622 | Keser et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465271 | Ko et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499354 | Najafi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6520014 | Brandi | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533554 | Vargo et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6552404 | Hynes et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556418 | Aigner et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6568274 | Lucas | May 2003 | B1 |
6584854 | Kimur et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6700174 | Miu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713828 | Chavan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6743656 | Orcutt et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6777263 | Gan et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6962867 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973835 | Rangsten et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7015060 | Kubena et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7122458 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7246525 | Birkelund et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7273763 | Neumeier et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7468552 | Ohta et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7539003 | Ray et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7704774 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8008738 | Villa et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8049287 | Combi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8304919 | Pendse et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8536663 | Kuo et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8704318 | Zhou | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9330929 | Kautzsch et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
20010023087 | Brandi | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020048839 | Miller et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020185737 | Regan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030019299 | Hori | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030056598 | Kimura et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093895 | Miyazaki et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030107868 | Chatzandroulis | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030143775 | Brady | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154796 | Ishio et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040171195 | Raben | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050016289 | Saito et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050124159 | Kalvesten et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156320 | Mastromatteo | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050229711 | Ohms et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060014358 | Sawyer et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060027522 | Martin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060032039 | Rangsten et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060063354 | Fortin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060097331 | Haltori et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060169049 | Matsubara | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060243054 | Saito et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070019101 | Minamio et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070141808 | Firtin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070275495 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080016683 | Brida et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080036082 | Eun | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080061412 | Shena et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080236292 | Reijs | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251705 | Tseng | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090166827 | Foster et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090322929 | Webster | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100055821 | Buhler et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100109140 | Oh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100139409 | Mischke et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171153 | Yang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100207217 | Zuniga-Ortis et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100242605 | Ofterdinger | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110027930 | El-Gamal et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110108932 | Benzel | May 2011 | A1 |
20110154905 | Hsu | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110230068 | Pahl | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120024075 | Peng | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120037935 | Yang | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120037953 | Hayano | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130093030 | Isebrand et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130127000 | Oganesian | May 2013 | A1 |
20130181314 | Ryu et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130264755 | Eskridge | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130276544 | Potasek et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140151822 | Graham | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150040675 | Ding | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150048461 | Mayer | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150061049 | Weber | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150122038 | Mayer et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150122041 | Lin | May 2015 | A1 |
20150122042 | Lin et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150260593 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150268115 | Robert et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150270180 | Yang | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160025583 | Besling et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160290883 | Schumm | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170122825 | Naumann | May 2017 | A1 |
20170210618 | Chang | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180188127 | Ermolov | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1140504 | Sep 2003 | CN |
102169038 | Aug 2011 | CN |
10027234 | Dec 2000 | DE |
19929025 | Dec 2000 | DE |
10-2009-046692 | May 2001 | DE |
10201054 | Jan 2003 | DE |
10-2005-008959 | Sep 2006 | DE |
10-2010-001073 | Jul 2011 | DE |
0155517 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0596711 | May 1994 | EP |
0633459 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0993778 | Apr 2000 | EP |
0992778 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1555517 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1860417 | Nov 2007 | EP |
2075221 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2135839 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2246292 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2421037 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2647594 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2653443 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2790214 | Oct 2014 | EP |
2871455 | May 2015 | EP |
3239681 | Nov 2017 | EP |
2729005 | Dec 1997 | JP |
2001124649 | May 2001 | JP |
2007-057238 | Mar 2007 | JP |
1020050075225 | Jul 2005 | KR |
2003006387 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2003-034016 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03036387 | May 2003 | WO |
2004-106879 | Dec 2004 | WO |
00036387 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2007117198 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2007120576 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP Extended Search Report dated Apr. 25, 2014 in EP Application No. 13005235.0 9 pages. |
Klaassen, et al., “Silicon Fusion Bonding and Deep Reactive Ion Etching; A New Technology From Microstructures,” The 8th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, and Eurosensors IX, Stockholm, Sweden, Jun. 25-29, 1995 4 pages. |
Allan, Roger, “Ever-Shrinking Ics Turn to Exotic Packaging Methods,” Jan. 15, 2009, Electronic Design, retrieved from http://electronicdesign.com/interconnects/ever-shrinking-ics-turn-exotic-packaging-methods. 4 pages. |
Allan, Rogers, “MEMS Inertial Sensors Push Size, Performance Limits for Next-Gen Mobile Devices,” Apr. 14, 2010, Electronic Design, retrieved from https://eletronicdesign.com/components/mems-inertial-sensors-push-size-performance-limits-next-gen-mobile-devices. 6 pages. |
Allan, Roger, Figure 2 in “Ever-Shrinking ICs Turn to Exotic Packaging Methods,” Jan. 15, 2009, Electronic Desgin, Retrieved from https://electronicdesign.com/site-files/electronicdesign.com/files/archive/electronicdesign.com/files/29/2037/fig_02_gif. 1 page. |
Allan, Roger, Figure 8 in “MEMS Inertial Sensors Push Size, Performance Limits for Net-Gen Mobile Devices,” Apr. 14, 2010, Electronic Design, retrieved from https://electronicdeisng.com/site-files/electronicdesign.com/files/archive/electronicdesign.com/Content/14978/60071_fig_08.jpg. 1 page. |
Baltes, et al., CMOS-based Microsensors and Packaging, Semsors and Actuators, vol. 92, No. 1-3 pp. 1-9, Aug. 1, 2011 9 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report dated Apr. 3, 2013 in EP Application No. 12007333.3 6 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report dated Apr. 28, 2014 in EP Application No. 13005236.8 11 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report dated Dec. 9, 2010 in EP Application No. 10009453.1 7 pages. |
EP Extended search Report dated May 31, 2016 in EP Application No. 13005235.0 11 pages. |
EP Wxtended Search Report dated Nov. 20, 2015 in EP Application No. 15173033.0 10 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report dated Oct. 2, 2015 in EP Application No. 15000967.8 6 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report dated Oct. 20, 2009 in EP Application No. 07008470.2 18 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report dated Oct. 11, 2006 in EP Application No. 06010606.9 10 pages. |
Kiihamaki, et al., “Integrated Pressure Sensors on SOI,” Micro Structure Workshop, 2004 4 pages. |
Petersen, et al., “Silicon Fusion Bonding for Pressure Sensors,” NovaSensor, TH215-4/88/0000-01444, pp. 144-147. 4 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Silicon On Insulator,” Oct. 17, 2013, pp. 1-5 5 pages. |
IPRP received for WO Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US20/33289 dated Dec. 2, 2021, 07pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200363281 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62849678 | May 2019 | US |