Patent Application
20100251793
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
(1) Field of the Invention
This application is directed to improvements in rolling mill housings used in rolling operations in the flat rolled metal industry. In particular, the present invention is directed toward a multi-roll cluster type of rolling mill.
(2) Description of Related Art
Cluster mills are popular in the rolling mill industry when a high gauge reduction is taken, a thin exit gauge is rolled, or a combination of the two. A cluster mill provides many advantages to the operation of a rolling mill and includes the following: small diameter work rolls, high housing stiffness, and a simplified gauge control. In many previous applications, the cluster mill housing has been built based on a mono block design, such as seen and described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,421,184, U.S. Pat. No. 2,187,250 in FIG. 8, and U.S. Pat. No. 2,776,586 in FIG. 8.
In particular, the centerline gauge (or thickness) control is excellent due to the high mill stiffness where any entry gauge increase is immediately met with a higher rolling force. The gauge control is very simple and supplied by rotating eccentric bearings on a support roll to adjust the roll gap. The developed rolling force is transferred to the mono block housing through the roll saddles at various angles which add to the mill stiffness. The rolling force is not thereby transferred into the mono block housing in the vertical direction only.
Though a Cluster mill has historically been attractive for many rolling applications, there is a need for improved flexibility in the rolling operation. One disadvantage to using a Cluster mill is a very small roll gap opening when there is a strip breakage. After a strip break, the improperly rolled metal strip is called a cobble. In many cases, a cobble results in many pieces of metal strip remaining within the mono block, and pieces of the cobble wrap around various rolls in the cluster roll arrangement. A cobble is a common, though infrequent, event during the rolling operation. Depending upon how quickly the entry side metal strip can be stopped, there may be damage to the rolls and ancillary equipment with a significant amount of metal strip to remove. Removal can take from several minutes to several hours depending upon the extent of damage to the rolls and other equipment. Sometimes, it is very difficult to remove the cluster mill rolls from the mono block due to jamming from broken strip. The ability to open the work rolls to a wide gap quickly in the event of a sudden strip tension loss, which indicates a strip break, would greatly help prevent cobbles from causing rolling mill damage. The desired opening gap to minimize damage is higher than currently available with the mono block work roll movement.
In addition, the Cluster mill has a limited range of work roll diameters that will operate within the design of the mono block. This lowers economic appeal. Work rolls are normally surface refinished by regrinding when they are worn out, and a limiting operating range makes reuse by grinding very limited.
Another disadvantage of the Cluster mill is the reduced ability to be flexible for a varied rolling operation. It is highly desirable in some commercial settings to have a single rolling mill capable of cold rolling with a heavy reduction and temper rolling with a light reduction. A temper rolling configuration preferably utilizes a larger work roll size. Larger work rolls allow for a longer work roll life, a faster rolling operation, favorable strip shape, and better rolling feasibility. In contrast, the mono block Cluster mill is unattractive for a mill that is capable of both temper and cold rolling operations. In particular, the small work roll diameter range is unsuitable for a mill configured to do both types of rolling.
The mono block design has a poor ability to thread the mill due to the small roll opening. It is difficult for the beginning end of the strip to always be flat and suitably ready to conveniently enter a small roll gap. The strip may be reluctant to enter the roll gap bite due to minor entry strip bending issues and require the manual intervention of an operator with long handled manual tools.
In a mono block design it is difficult to determine the rolling force, i.e. the vertical separation force, between the two work rolls during the rolling operation. The rolls are positioned in the rolling housing so that the vertical rolling force is dispersed into the mono block by several rolls. This highly restricts the ability to measure the rolling force with accuracy. It is desirable to measure the rolling force and use it to improve yield by more accurate rolling to the correct gauge in the initial setup.
The mono block is not designed for a convenient and accurate tilting arrangement when there is a significant side to side gauge variance in the metal strip, that is, a wedge shaped strip. Depending upon the upstream hot rolling operation, a metal strip will often have a moderate thickening in the middle of 1 to 5% of the nominal gauge. After hot rolling, the strip may be slit into two halves (or more) for further downstream processing which includes rolling on a Cluster mill. This presents a wedge shaped strip to the Cluster mill with an unpredictable thickness across the width. Since the mono block does not have a rolling force measurement, it is difficult to make an accurate side to side rolling gap correction. The rotation of the crown eccentric rings used for profile control do not provide enough tilting capability. Consequently, a wedge shaped strip will have other problems in rolling which include strip breakage, creating camber, creating centerbuckle, creating uneven edge wave, and creating other unusual strip flatness problems.
Others have recognized operational problems of the mono block design and attempted improvements. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,857,372 describes a split housing and prestress rod arrangement with the goal of improving various operational problems. The methods utilized are mechanically complicated, expensive to machine, and do not allow for the rapid roll opening needed to prevent damage when the strip breaks. The design does not consider tilting of the mill. Also, the ability to adjust passline is very restricted and is equivalent to a mono block design.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,996,388 considers the use of hydraulic cylinders to prestress a rolling cage useful in a hot bar rolling operation. The design is unsuitable for a high mill stiffness to take advantage of a simplified, satisfactory commercial gauge control system in a flat rolled product. The methods utilized are mechanically complicated, expensive to machine, and do not allow for the rapid roll opening needed to prevent damage when the strip breaks. The design does not consider tilting of the mill or passline adjustment.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,260,397 considers the need to provide operational improvements that are not available with a mono block. The design does not take advantage of the mono block stiffness, but rather adds an additional pair of larger mill housings which greatly adds to the expense of the mill. The design does not use the simplified gauge control available with a mono block, and is not a prestress design. The design has a relatively low mill stiffness which requires a complicated gauge control system.
It is a primary object of the present invention to provide a pre-stressed rolling mill which has the advantages of a conventional mono-block mill housing, utilizing a Cluster mill gauge control system, and overcomes limitations and operational problems just described. It is highly desirable to have a rolling mill with a high apparent mill stiffness, a simplified gauge control system, a large work roll gap opening for threading, a rapid work roll gap opening method, a roll force measurement, satisfactory side to side tilting, and is able to use the work rolls over a much wider diameter range. Such a mill is capable of operating satisfactorily as a commercial temper mill and a commercial cold mill.
The present invention utilizes the existing method of controlling the gauge at the exit of the cluster mill by rotating screwdown eccentric rings in the backing assemblies. This method is widely accepted commercially and is very preferable for commercial reasons. To that end, adding additional features and improvements preferably utilize a highly stiff mill to incorporate the existing gauge control method. U.S. Pat. No. 5,471,859 “Background Art” describes the use of eccentric rings or shafts on supporting roll bearings which are adjusted by a shaft and gearing system on either side of the rolling mill. The “Background Art” of U.S. Pat. No. 5,471,859 is incorporated by reference herein. The gauge control system where the exit gauge is substantially controlled by movement of at least one support roll bearing position by use of a rotating eccentric is herein called “eccentric bearing.”
For the purposes of this application, the side of the mill where the operator generally controls the mill will be called the “operator side” or “front side.” The opposite side is called the “drive side” or the “back side.” The two sides are divided by the lengthwise direction of the metal strip. The rolls used for the rolling operation are nearly always inserted into the mill housings from the operator side.
The four prestress rods are shown to be located at the four corners of the upper and lower mill housings. The exact location of the prestress rods is not critical. But it is very preferable that one prestress rod is located in each of the four quadrants defined by the lengthwise direction of the metal strip and the work roll rotational centerline, as seen in a top view looking downward. The term “four corners” is understood to mean in each quadrant. Normally the prestress rods will be substantially symmetrical with respect to the work roll rotational centerline and the metal strip centerline, but this is not a requirement.
Before the rolling operation, and after threading the mill, the upper hydraulic cylinder creates tension in the prestress rod, which in turn, causes the upper and lower mill housings to be forced together. The force creates a compressive stress in each housing. The prestress force is chosen so that the rolling force created in the work roll bite will reduce, but not eliminate, the compressive stress in the housings.
To ensure smooth movement of the upper housing on the four prestress rods, a stabilizing bar 108 is used to keep the rod positions vertical. The attachment may be a rigid bolt, pin, or ball connection. The purpose of the stabilizing bar is to keep the four prestress rods vertical and spaced correctly to a suitable tolerance that will allow smooth movement of the upper housing on the prestress rods.
The upper hydraulic cylinders may also be called prestress cylinders. The lower hydraulic cylinders may also be called spacer cylinders.
Alternately, in other embodiments, other numbers of rolls could be used in the mill housing, such as 6, 12, 16, 18, 20, and 30 rolls. The twenty roll cluster arrangement shown in
The prestress force is generated by a significant hydraulic pressure in chamber 406a. For example, a maximum pressure might be 5,000 psi, but other designed pressure limits may be chosen. The hydraulic pressure may be employed to provide a prestress force that will exceed the expected rolling force. This force will cause the upper housing 402 to be pressed against the lower housing 403 through the lower hydraulic cylinder 407 which is rigidly attached to the lower housing 403. The prestress force will maintain a very stiff mill housing, similar to a mono block, when a rolling force in the work roll bite is generated.
If the lower hydraulic cylinder is completely retracted for a particular rolling application, the upper housing may be pressed against the lower housing through the outside plate of the lower hydraulic cylinder. Alternately, the outside plate of the lower hydraulic cylinder may be recessed within the lower housing, and the upper and lower housings are in direct contact with each other.
A lower passline adjustment system 411 is used to adjust the position of the lower housing to maintain a consistent location of the work roll bite. This is normally referred to as maintaining the same passline. The lower passline adjustment system is shown under the prestress rod, but this is only one possible embodiment.
A wear plate 410 is bolted into the top housing 402. It preferably contacts with the lower cylinder piston 409 except when the mill is fully opened. Both the wear plate 410 and the lower cylinder piston 409 have a matching machined spherical surface to allow the top housing to rock on the lower cylinder piston. The spherical surface may have a large machined diameter, such as 25 inches. The use of a wear plate is not required, but is a preferred embodiment. Alternately, the wear plate may be integrated onto the lower cylinder piston which presses against a matching surface on the upper housing.
It must be understood that particular details of the prestress rod 401 and upper hydraulic cylinder are not shown in the simplified
For improved maintenance access, the upper housing 402 and lower housing 403 portions that are illustrated in
Preferably the position sensor 507a is highly accurate with a position resolution of less than 0.0001 inches. Preferably it is also highly responsive with a sensing time constant less than 100 milliseconds. The time constant is the time it takes for the sensor's step response to reach 63% of its final value. The sensor may be mechanical, optical, electronic, magnetic, capacitance, laser based, or a combination. The sensor may be incorporated inside the mill housing rather than an external mounting as shown in
The hydraulic pressure in chamber 503 is preferably controlled by a highly responsive hydraulic system that is capable of regulating the hydraulic pressure in chamber 503 to a very closely controlled level. A servo valve, proportional valve, solenoid servo valve, or other similar responding hydraulic valve may be employed with success. Preferably, the time constant of the hydraulic control in pressure chamber 503 is no more than 50 milliseconds. The hydraulic controlling valve is preferably employed in a complete hydraulic system with suitable support equipment including accumulators in close proximity. In another preferred embodiment, the control loop response for chamber 503 is faster than the automatic gauge control response to ensure stability of the overall gauge control system. Typically, the automatic gauge control system response in a mono block cluster mill has a time constant of about 30-100 milliseconds, and the control loop response for chamber 503 can be suitably matched with a faster response.
The amount of hydraulic pressure in chamber 501 is based on the amount of prestress required to exceed the vertical rolling force at the work roll bite. The force must be great enough to keep the upper housing 508 in complete contact with the upper housing wear plate 506 and the lower hydraulic cylinder piston 505. When combined with the highly accurate and responsive position control of the lower hydraulic cylinder, the apparent mill stiffness will be very comparable to a cluster mill mono block. The hydraulic pressure in chamber 501 is hydraulically blocked off during the rolling operation and will vary based on rolling forces. Hydraulic pressure in chamber 502 is substantially vented or operated at a low pressure during the rolling operation to prevent air entrapment.
During the rolling operation, the lower cylinder will be controlled to maintain a constant position, and is not used to provide gauge control of the exit strip. Due to the prestress force from the upper hydraulic cylinder, the prestressed split mill housing provides a stiffness very comparable to the mono block mill housing. When used in a gauge control system, the current invention will effectively have 90-95% of a mono block stiffness.
In a preferred embodiment, the same hydraulic pumps are used to supply both the lower hydraulic cylinder control and upper hydraulic cylinder control.
The control system of the mill during the rolling process is relatively simple. As an overview, the upper hydraulic cylinder is initially loaded to a desired pressure to create a prestress rod tension. The hydraulic valve that feeds the upper cylinder is then closed off for the rolling operation, that is, it is hydraulically blocked. The upper cylinder pressure is then allowed to naturally vary due to the gauge control and thickness variances of the incoming metal strip. The upper hydraulic cylinder pressure is not adjusted by a control loop, which prevents it from causing control conflicts with the gauge control system. The lower hydraulic cylinder is operated on a position mode control loop, as previously described, in all cases based on the desired opening between the upper and lower mill housings. The control of the exit strip gauge is by eccentric bearings.
The position of the lower hydraulic cylinder during the rolling operation may be chosen within a range that is suitable for the eccentric bearing operating range. For example, after a roll change, the eccentric bearing can be rotated to the position calculated by the set up program. This establishes a zero position. If the large work roll is applied, the distance between top and bottom housings must be greater. The passline adjustment system, located at the bottom of the mill, will lower the mill housings to maintain the pass line based on the set up program.
Also, the present invention can be used for rolling with a mill tilting function. The lower hydraulic cylinder can be raised a very small amount, such as 0.010″ or 0.050″, to provide room for the upper housing to tilt within a suitably large operating range. If mill is not to be tilted, then the upper cylinder may be lowered so that the upper and lower mills are touching. The mill will operate the same as a mono-block after pre-stressing is employed.
When the mill is used as a temper mill and utilizes larger work roll diameters, the lower hydraulic cylinder will be raised and the tilting function can be accomplished easily. The ability to adjust the side to side position of the lower hydraulic cylinder is a distinct advantage of the present invention.
Frequently there are diameter issues with new rolls or the regrinding of worn rolls. The present invention provides for utilizing rolls with a larger diameter on one end, i.e. a tapered roll, without significant impact on metal strip shape or gauge, when compared to the mono block mill.
As already stated, existing cluster mill housings often have a very limited work roll range. This limitation is due to the mono-block mill housing limited vertical space. This present invention allows for continuous work roll diameter variances for reduction and temper rolling thanks to the additional space provided by spacer cylinders. Operational work roll diameter ratios of 1.5 to 3 are now possible where a maximum work roll diameter is 50% to 200% larger than the minimum work roll diameter in the present invention which is not possible in previous mono block mill housing methods. Previous mono block housing methods typically only allow a 10-20% diameter range, and in some select cases up to a 50% diameter range. The present invention provides for a larger range of work roll diameters that may be conveniently used in the mill operation. The work roll diameter range may vary based on the intended rolling mill operational design.
The present invention is fully capable of rolling the flat metal strip to desirable tight commercial tolerances. Preferably, the centerline exit gauge (or thickness) is within 1% of the target exit gauge for over 95% of the incoming strip length. The present invention is applicable to a wide variety of commercially rolled flat metals in thicknesses and materials that are commonly rolled in cluster mills.
Some operators tend to view the rolling mill as operating at a constant steady state or constant condition. In fact, there are a number of important and ongoing changes during the rolling process. The work rolls normally heat up and expand which changes the rolling force. The incoming strip may have unexpected thickness or shape variances. The friction in the roll bite changes due to roll wear, lubrication changes, speed changes, and changes in rolling force. Suitable corrections must be made on an ongoing basis to provide satisfactory commercial operation. Often the changes are relatively minor and various control loops are employed to make suitable corrections to keep the mill rolling within commercial tolerances.
In general, all four lower hydraulic cylinders and all four upper hydraulic cylinders are operated in a coordinated fashion, and any position or pressure changes are normally applied evenly. However, tilting is coordinated from the front (operator) side to the back (drive) side and each side may be moved in a different direction. Often they are moved by an adjustment that is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. Additionally, each side may be coordinated to maintain the same rolling force within a particular range to provide for a better shape control.
The rolling force can be determined during the steady state rolling condition by the difference in the force generated by the upper and lower hydraulic cylinders when considering the weight of the upper mill housing, the weight of the upper rolls, and the weight of any equipment attached to the upper mill housing. The hydraulic pressure in the upper and lower hydraulic cylinders may be monitored by pressure transducers to facilitate a computation. A calculation and can then be performed during the rolling operation and a display of the rolling force shown to an operator.
It is a distinct advantage of the present invention to be able to determine the overall rolling force-deflection curve of the mill for gauge control and rolling purposes. In the case of a mono block, it is difficult to determine the force-deflection curve as the vertical rolling force at the work roll bite is not reasonably measurable. In the present invention, the force-deflection curve is relatively easy to measure utilizing the upper and lower hydraulic cylinders. The curve, and the mill stiffness which is thereby determined, is very useful for proper setup of the mill to ensure rapid and accurate gauge control when starting the rolling operation. The ability to improve the initial operating parameters of the rolling process for a variety of roll and rolling conditions is helpful to improve process yields.
The rolling force-deflection curve may be obtained in a calibration method in the offline state. A preferred method is to retract the lower cylinders, prestress the upper and lower housing together with a preselected upper hydraulic cylinder pressure, and then separate the upper mill housing from the lower mill housing by raising the lower cylinders. The separation distance between the two housings, along with the known prestress hydraulic pressure, is then used to determine the mill modulus of the housings. When the housing modulus is combined with the known modulus of the round prestress rod shaft, the overall prestressed assembly modulus is then known. Once the overall prestressed assembly modulus is known, as illustrated in
In reference to
When the strip is initially fed into the rolling mill during threading, the upper hydraulic cylinder may be operated at a reduced pre-stress level, normal operating pre-stress level, or at a full mill open condition depending upon the type of material and thickness being threaded to facilitate easy threading. Similarly, the lower hydraulic cylinder position may be coordinated to support the operation of the upper hydraulic cylinder to provide easy threading.
In the case of the present invention, the hydraulic fluid in either the upper hydraulic cylinder or lower hydraulic cylinder do not cause a significant lowering of the mill stiffness when compared to a mono block. The rapid hydraulic control system in the lower hydraulic cylinder in conjunction with the pre-stress housing concept provides a very high stiffness when compared to the need to correct the gauge in the mill.
In the case of the present invention, the hydraulic fluid in either the upper hydraulic cylinder or lower hydraulic cylinder does not cause a significant lowering of the mill stiffness when compared to a mono block. The rapid hydraulic control system in the lower hydraulic cylinder (operated in position mode with much higher speed than the AGC control loop) provides a very high stiffness when compared to the needed timing of gauge corrections in the rolling mill bite. The hydraulic oil used in either of the upper hydraulic cylinder or the lower hydraulic cylinder, may be a higher bulk modulus fluid, such as glycol, to increase the rigidity of the system.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been described, the invention may be modified and adapted to various operational methods to those skilled in the art. Therefore, this invention is not limited to the description and FIGURE shown herein, and includes all such embodiments, changes, and modifications that are encompassed by the scope of the claims.
The present application is a divisional application of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/961,597 filed on Dec. 20, 2007 entitled “Prestressed Rolling Mill Housing Assembly With Improved Operational Features,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11961597 | Dec 2007 | US |
| Child | 12818800 | US |
