Patent Grant
8453400
The present invention relates generally to a building material to be used in building construction. More particularly, the present invention relates to prestressed, strong foam glass tiles, which are to be used in building construction and other purposes and assemblies made therefrom.
Over the past decades, there have been a significant number of terrorists attacks on government buildings owned by the United States and other countries both outside of the United States and within. For example, in 1993, terrorists exploded a car bomb inside the garage of the World Trade Center located in New York City, resulting in loss of life and significant property damage. Since then, in 1995, other extremists exploded a truck outside of the Federal Building located in Oklahoma City, Okla. also resulting in significant loss of life and property damage. In 1998, the United States embassies in Nairobi and Dar Es Salaam were also subject to terrorists attacks by car bombs, each of which resulted in significant loss of life and property damages. More recently, the tragic events at the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon in Virginia has further emphasized the long felt need to develop and manufacture building materials which are able to withstand the shock wave from car bomb explosions and other similar terrorist attacks.
Traditionally, the support structures for many buildings are made from reinforced concrete. In some instances, when stronger materials are desired, prestressed concrete has been used. For example, prestressed concrete has been used in buildings, underground structures, TV towers, floating storage and offshore structures, power stations, nuclear reactor vessels and numerous types of bridge systems including segmental and cable-stayed bridges. Prestressed concrete has been considered advantageous over reinforced concrete in instances where a shallower depth for the same span and loading conditions is desired. Prestressed concrete has also been considered advantageous over reinforced concrete where a lighter weight material is desired. Prestressed concrete also requires less concrete, and less reinforcement due to its added strength. Unfortunately, prestressing operations themselves results in added costs: formwork is more complex, since the geometry of prestressed sections is usually composed of flanged sections with thin webs. Thus, it would be desirable to have a building material which obtains the added strength of prestressed concrete, but were to weigh less and thus require less support structure. Lighter support structures have the ability to increase useable space within the same footprint, and/or increase the number of floors that can be supported, and/or withstand greater impact forces, such as caused by earthquakes. Typically, prestressed concrete will contain water, either as a result of its manufacturing process or due to water migrating from outside the concrete. As a result of the presence of such water, the tension members that prestress the concrete, usually made of steel or other corrosive metals, may rust and thus weaken the structure. Further, as a result of the presence of such water, when the prestressed concrete is exposed to typical heat/thaw cycles it can crack. Also, as a result of the presence of such water, in the case of fire, the prestressed concrete is subject to failure as a result of steam formation. Another drawback to using prestressed concrete is that it has a limited variety of aesthetic appearances.
While the concept of using foam glass as a construction material is well known in the prior art, generally such foam glass has been used as a high temperature insulator and thus seeks to minimize its density and weight and is not suitable for absorbing sufficient energy from a shock wave from unexpected explosions or to resist an earthquake and/or wind and heat loading. The shortcomings in such conventional foam glass as relevant to this long standing problem is now described.
For example, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (“PCC”) of Pittsburgh, Pa. has developed and marketed a product known as Foam Glas® Insulation Systems, which is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,959,541, 4,119,422, 4,198,224, 4,571,321 and 4,623,585. Because the focus of these developments are directed to making a foam insulating material, the Foam Glas® Insulation Systems tile commercially sold by PCC is relatively light, weighing 9.5 lb./cu. ft. Furthermore, since the purpose of this tile is to be used as thermal insulation, it lacks surface strength, and can be dented very easily. Because the Foam Glas® Insulation Systems tile is of relatively low density, e.g., 9.5 lb./cu. ft., such tiles will easily break when exposed to forces typically exerted on exterior walls of a building or other structure. Thus, such tiles are not suitable to be used as tiling for an exterior wall. Similarly, this foam, when exposed to a shock wave from an explosion will absorb very little of the shock waves energy when it implodes. A shock wave is a measure associated with explosions which is easily understood by those skilled in the art as being a pressure front resulting from an explosion.
Others have also attempted to use foam glass tiles as the outer skin-surface of buildings. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,069,960 discloses a thermally insulating foam glass tile that is coated with an outside surface to make a hard skin to protect the outside of a building. The tiles disclosed are fabricated in extremely small sizes, i.e., 18 cm×18 cm×6 cm, and the interior foam material which makes up the bulk of the material is generally of a low density. Significantly, there is no indication that the strength of the material disclosed is capable of absorbing sufficient energy from an explosion, and indeed the size of the disclosed tiles would not be ideally suitable for absorbing such energy. Furthermore, there is no indication that small size pores are being used.
Prior work by the inventors and others have developed methods for making foam glass tiles of a wide a variety of densities as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,430,108 that can be used for building materials. While the techniques and methods disclosed were useful to manufacture then-standard size tiles of 4.25 in.×4.25 in.×0.25 in., this disclosure does not teach how to manufacture tiles of a larger size, for example 2 ft.×2 ft.×3 in. Likewise the tiles manufactured under these methods were relatively light, e.g., less than 10 lbs., and were not manufactured to withstand the effects of an explosion. To the contrary, these methods sought to optimize the thermal insulation properties of the material, and thus made smaller, lighter and weaker tiles.
While still others have worked on trying to make some large-size porous shaped bodies, these have been smaller in critical dimensions and of lower density than the present invention and not suitable to absorb a substantial amount of a shock wave which impacts the bodies associated with an explosion or earthquake. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,151,228 describes a process for manufacturing large-size porous shaped bodies of low density by swelling, in order to manufacture large-size cellular ceramic structural elements, e.g., multi-story high wall elements having a low weight. In the example, it discloses a tile 8.2 ft.×1.64 ft.×2 in., with a density of 26 lb./cu. ft. and a mass of 60 lbs. It also teaches to obtain a low density in order to optimize thermal insulation. Thus, this foam when exposed to a shock wave from an explosion or earthquake or heat or wind loading or stress of any kind will absorb very little of the shock waves energy when it implodes.
Further, others, such as Central Glass Co. Ltd., of Ube, Japan, have attempted to make foam glass using densities in the range of 0.3 to 0.6 g/cu. cm (or 18.7 to 37.4 lb./cu. ft.) as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,798,758. The '758 patent explains that in order to make the foam glass stronger, an outer layer is also added which has a density in the range of 0.8 to 1.7 g/cu. cm and a thickness of 1.5 to 20 mm. In the examples shown, all the samples which are over 30 lbs. in weight were found to be unacceptable from a cutability and impact resistance perspective, for among other reasons that the surface had appreciable breaking and sometimes cracking, thus not providing a closed pore surface. Further, U.S. Pat. No. 4,833,015, a later patent by Central Glass Co. Ltd., explains the tensile strength perpendicular to the surface of the tile described in the '758 patent was very poor, i.e., below 150 lb./sq. in., thus making it unsuitable for purposes of the present invention. Even after putting a third layer to improve the strength of the product as described in the '015 patent, the best tensile strength achieved was below 200 lb./sq. in., and making it unsuitable for purposes of the present invention.
Other efforts by Central Glass Co., Ltd. attempt to make higher density glass tiles, such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,992,321. However, these tiles do not appear to be a closed pore structure and there is no indication as to their strength. Indeed, filler materials are used in an attempt to increase the strength with no reporting data. Further, the tiles disclosed were also very thin, 33 mm (or 1.3 in.).
Still others have attempted to make foam glass tiles with smaller pore size. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,516,351, the relationship of pore size to thermal resistivity is shown in which the best pore size is always greater than 1.0 mm. Similarly, the density is always less than 12 lb./cu. ft. Other efforts to use small pore size and larger densities, such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,951,632 and 4,758,538, failed to achieve comparable strengths and does not disclose achieving a closed pore outer skin as disclosed by the present invention.
In the past, although some have made tempered glass, such as used in windshields, no one has successfully made prestressed foam glass tiles, like the present invention. Similarly, while it has been suggested in U.S. Pat. No. 4,024,309, to prestress foam glass slabs, the methods disclosed to achieve such prestressing are inoperable. Specifically, the '309 patent discloses a process whereby outer metal sheets are to be placed in tension by stretching while foam glass is formed therebetween. Unfortunately, the temperatures at which such foam glass is formed will cause the outer metal sheets which are in contact therewith to stretch and thereby releasing the intended tension. As such, the process disclosed would be inoperable. Further, the method disclosed in the '309 patent utilizes water cooling of the foam glass, which will cause the outer edge to go through the glass transition before the interior portion, thus causing the interior portion to shrink due to the higher thermal expansion coefficient of the liquid center as compared to the solid exterior, which will cause the final product to be in tension in the center rather than in compression as desired. Thus, even if the resulting product does not break from such tensions, the desired prestressing would be the opposite as desired, making the final product very weak at best.
Unlike the prior art discussed above, the tiles of the present invention are designed and constructed of various materials so that such tiles have properties which are ideal for withstanding the shock wave associated with large explosions or make a building or other structure resistant to earthquakes and other shock waves.
Thus, while the prior art is of interest, the known methods and apparatus of the prior art present several limitations which the present invention seeks to overcome. In particular, it is an object of the present invention to provide a prestressed, strong foam glass tile which can be used as a building material or otherwise.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a prestressed, strong foam glass tile that is lighter than prestressed concrete.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a prestressed, strong foam glass tile that is stronger than prestressed concrete.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a prestressed, strong foam glass tile that can withstand higher temperatures than prestressed concrete.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a prestressed, strong foam glass tile that allows substantially less water penetration than prestressed concrete, so as to protect the support members and to prevent cracking due to freeze/thaw cycles, and to prevent steam explosions inside the concrete in case of fire.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a prestressed, strong foam glass tile which can be used on the critical surfaces of buildings at high risk for terrorist attacks, in combination with cement, steel or other building materials.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a prestressed, strong foam glass tile which can come in a variety of aesthetic appearances.
These and other objects will become apparent from the foregoing description.
It has now been found that the above and related objects of the present invention are obtained in the form of a prestressed, strong foam glass tile for use in construction. The prestressed, strong foam glass tiles of the present invention are capable of withstanding relatively large prestressing as a result of their relatively high compression strength. These prestressed, foam glass tiles will absorb and/or withstand more energy from an explosion than other foam glass tiles, withstand higher heat and wind loading and other mechanical forces. The foam glass tile of the present invention is strong enough that it can be prestressed over 1000 psi (lb./sq. in.), and more preferably over 2,000, 3,000, 4,000 and even more preferably over 5,000 psi.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the prestressed, strong foam glass tiles of the present invention may be included as part of a prestressed assembly for use in buildings or other structures. Said prestressed assembly may be comprised of: at least one prestressed foam glass tile, having a prestressed compression of 1000 psi or greater; at least two metal beams; and one or more tension members; wherein said at least one foam glass tile is placed between said at least two metal beams and held in compression by said one or more tension members at least 1000 psi. Alternatively, the prestress compression of said at least one prestressed foam glass tile is 2000 psi or greater, and preferably is 3000 psi or greater, and more preferably 4000 psi or greater, and even more preferably, is 5000 psi or greater. Alternatively, the metal members may be inside of said tiles, partially inside said tiles, and/or outside of said tiles. The prestressed foam glass tile of the present invention may also be under compression by a portion of the weight of a building. The prestressed assembly may be a column in a building. The metal beams may be comprised of steel or any other suitable metal. The tension members may be comprised of tension bolts, wire, carbon fibers, standard and/or compact seven-wire prestressing strands, a rod, an angle iron, a plate, a bar and/or other devices well known in the art for causing compression of prestressed concrete. The metal beams may be cambered prior to assembly to account for stress which will be applied upon assembly. Alternatively, said assembly may further comprise two metal pieces with beveled edges which are placed between said at least one foam glass tile and each of the metal beams. Said at least one foam glass tile may be comprised of one or more columns of prestressed foam glass tiles, and/or one or more rows of prestressed foam glass tiles. Said at least one foam glass tile may further be comprised of two sets of foam glass tiles and said tension member is located between said two sets of foam glass tiles.
The above and related objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood by reference to the following, detailed description of the preferred, albeit illustrative, embodiment of the present invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein:
The present invention relates to prestressed, strong foam glass tiles which can be used as building materials and otherwise. The present invention may be used on the critical surfaces of buildings at high risk for terrorist attacks, in combination with cement, steel or other building materials. The present invention may also be used on surfaces of typical buildings and/or as structural support members of such buildings. The present invention may be used in lieu of reinforced concrete and/or prestressed concrete in any application including but not limited to buildings, underground structures, TV towers, floating storage and offshore structures, power stations, nuclear reactor vessels and numerous types of bridge systems including segmental and cable-stayed bridges. The present invention has the advantages of being more resistant to earthquakes and/or wind and heat loading.
In co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/625,071 (“the '071 Application,” published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2005/0019542 A1), which is owned by the same applicant and was filed on the same day as this application, and the content of which is incorporated by reference herein, a strong, high density foam glass tile having small pore sizes is disclosed which have tension strength ranging from 775 to 2500 lb./sq. in. and compression strength ranging from 2000 to 14,600 lb./sq. in. This previously unattainable strength in foam glass tiles, now makes it possible to apply the technology associated with prestressed concrete to prestressed foam glass tiles. The present invention is directed at this new and heretofore not possible application. Details on how to manufacture such tiles are disclosed in that application.
There are many possible methods to fabricate ceramic foam panels with various densities, sizes, and surface finishes. U.S. Pat. No. 4,430,108 describes various foam glass products fabricated from fly ash and other additives with various densities, and surface finishes, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. Similarly, co-pending application Ser. No. 10/076,971, filed on Feb. 15, 2002 by the same assignee, also discloses additional processes useful in manufacturing the present invention, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. Foam glass with various densities can be fabricated by varying the composition and type and concentration of cellulating agents. Viscosity of glass is the dominating parameter during the foaming process. In addition, the pore structure and its uniformity are dependent on the distribution and particle size of the cellulating agent.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the foam glass tile preferably has a closed pore outer skin, which thus provides the tile with increased strength and protects the tile against water, and the freeze, thaw cycle. The closed pore outer skin may either be formed naturally as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,430,108 or mechanically by bonding a secondary glass surface as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,069,960, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. Alternatively, the closed pore outer skin may be formed in accordance to the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 4,833,015, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. Natural formation is advantageous because it does not require additional labor and quality control, and thus is more cost effective and less burdensome. Using a secondary glass surface may also be advantageous because such techniques allow the closed pore outer skin to have various color and texture variations which will make the tile architecturally attractive for use as an exterior or interior facade of a building or other structure. One way of making different color surfaces is by the use of different color additives, as is generally well known to those skilled in the art.
Another advantage of the high density foam glass tile of the present invention is that when it is exposed to a blast shock wave it is capable of absorbing a substantial portion of the shock wave. Because these tiles are capable of absorbing a substantial portion of a blast shock wave, they are particularly advantageous as building construction materials for interior and exterior surfaces of buildings which are at risk of exposure to explosions, such as government buildings, embassies and high visibility/famous buildings.
The selection of the particular size, thickness and density of the foam glass tile depends upon the use to which the tile is intended to be made. For example, if the tile is intended to be used to resist earthquakes, then the tiles should be optimized to be the lowest weight that can withstand the wind pressure. By contrast, if the tile is intended to protect a building or structure from shock waves associated with an explosion, then the tile should be optimized to increase its density and decrease its pore size to be strong enough to withstand such a shock wave or vis-versa to absorb such a shock wave. The desired thickness will depend upon the proximity of the exposed tile to the location of the potential explosion. For example, on the outside of a building, the thickness would have to take into account the distance of the tile to the nearest location where an automobile or truck with explosives may be parked. On the other hand, in an interior of a building, such as a support column, the proximity anticipated could be immediately next to such a column, although the likely anticipated explosive load would be substantially less.
For aesthetic purposes, the tiles with a finished layer can be used on any surface subject to public view. Thus, if only one surface will be exposed to public view, than only that surface needs to have the tiles with a finished layer. On the other hand, if both sides of a wall sought to be protected by the present invention are subject to a public view, than a second tile with an appropriate finished layer can be used on the second exposed side, such as the interior of the building. Alternatively, other interior surfaces can also be used.
Another advantage of the tiles of the present invention is that such tiles are also heat insulating as well as fire proof. Thus, these tiles have an added advantage of being able to be used to protect a support column from a terrorist fire attack such as a Moltov cocktail, or other sources of fire. The use of the tiles of the present invention can thereby either prevent and/or delay the destruction of such support columns, thereby increasing the likelihood that occupants of an attacked building will have sufficient time to evacuate.
In the preferred embodiment, the tile of the present invention can be manufactured using raw materials which include (but are not necessarily limited to) silica, fly ash, volcanic ash, diatomaceous earth, siliceous minerals, alkali carbonates, calcium and magnesium minerals such as dolomite, and gypsum, sodium silicate, borax, glass powders (such as cullet) and foaming agents. The foaming agent can be selected from carbonaceous organics such as sugar and starch, carbon black, silicon carbide, carbonates, sulfates and other like materials.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the foam glass tiles may be reinforced by using a metal netting, metal wires or alternative support structures as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,798,758, 4,833,015, 4,987,028, and 4,992,321, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. While on the one hand, these additional materials may help strengthen the resulting foam glass tile, on the other hand, they also can make it more difficult to cut.
Under one embodiment of the present invention shown in
In order to insure that the strain is applied evenly, the strain measured by strain gauges 14 is monitored. Specifically, the strain gauges 14 on the side walls of tile 12 that are adjacent tension bolts 18 should be monitored to insure that stress is applied equally. For example, the nuts 22 should be tightened while bolt heads 24 are held fixed in a manner so as to maintain the stress gauges 14 approximately even although not necessarily exactly the same. Significantly, until an appropriate tightening protocol is developed for a particular configuration, it is useful to have strain gauges located near each tension bolt to ensure even tightening.
In
It is also possible to join the foam glass tile with other solid layers via a joining compound. For instance, appropriate contact adhesives can be applied between a sheet of metal and foam glass. One such adhesive that can be used with aluminum sheets is a silicone based adhesive. Other examples are application of a polymeric foam between the foam glass and another backing material to protect the polymeric foam. Polyurethane foam and cement board are examples of this type of multilayer backing. The advantage of polyurethane foam is that, it can be applied in place into a gap between a pre-positioned foam glass board and a sheathing back layer. Polymeric backing are particularly useful to reduce fragmentation of the brittle layers such as foam glass and more so of the cementaceous layers. The backing layer may contain multiple layers of foam glass bonded together with cement, polymeric foams or other contact adhesives. The tile may also be joined using carbon fibers, polymers, glues, cement, or other adhesives known in the art.
In
The two steel beams 56 are bolted together by two tension bolts 54 in a manner consistent with the discussion in
In
The two steel beams 66 are bolted together by two tension bolts 64A, 64B in a manner consistent with the discussion in
One advantage of using this type of embodiment of assembly 60 is that the front wall and back wall can have different types of surfaces. In particular, since prestressed, foam glass tiles of the present invention are capable of many different type of aesthetic finishes as described in the co-pending application owned by the same applicant discussed above which was filed on the same date as the present application, it is possible for a wall based on this embodiment to have a different outer surface than the inner surface, and there are a wide variety of surfaces that can be selected as discussed above. Another advantage of using this type of embodiment of assembly 60 is that, like the prior embodiment, the tension bolts 64A, 64B is protected against the environment. Further, since there is a built in space between the two walls, wiring, plumbing and other utilities can be built in or brought therethrough. In accordance with this embodiment, the steel beams 66 can have appropriate holes designed in to pass through wiring, plumbing, and other utilities. The foam glass tiles of the present invention are also capable of being cut to provide access holes, without significantly adversely affecting their strength. Alternatively, the empty space can be filled with polymeric foam or other appropriate filler to provide additional insulation, and protection against environmental exposure to the tension bolts and wiring, plumbing and other utilities.
Thus the assembly 70 is comprised of two sets of foam glass tiles 72A/72B/72E etc. and 72C/72D/72F etc. The first set of foam glass tiles can be comprised of more than one column of tiles such as represented by column comprised of tiles 72A and 72B. The first set of foam glass tiles can be comprised of more than one row of tiles such as represented by tiles 72A and 72E. Similarly, the second set of foam glass tiles can be comprised of more than one column and more than one row of tiles. This assembly 70 may be further modified in accordance with the description of the previously assemblies 10, 10A, 50 and 60.
An additional advantage of the embodiment of the present invention represented by assembly 70 in
In another embodiment of the present invention shown in
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing method of making the tiles and assemblies of the present invention could be modified or other methods of fabrication can be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
As set forth in the co-pending '071 Application, which is incorporated by reference herein as discussed above, the foam glass tiles in Examples 1-7 of the present application were made by blending the raw materials set forth under Composition in Table 1 below:
In order to make a useful comparison, the weight of the composition was normalized assuming with the total amount of silica plus fly ash equals 100 grams. Thereafter, to insure the proper amount of material is used the normalized composition weight is multiplied by an appropriate batch size factor, as indicated in Table 1, to account for the size of the mold being used. For example, a batch size factor of 50×, has been used for a mold 8 inches×14 inches×4 inches.
The resulting slurry was dried, and the powder mixture was calcined at a temperature between 900° C. and 1100° C., as indicated in the process section of Table 1, for between 5 to 60 minutes, as indicated in the process section of Table 1, to react the raw materials, and decompose sugar to finely, and evenly dispersed carbonaceous phase. The calcined product was ground to fine powders, placed in an Inconel™ mold, and was foamed by heating at a temperature between 750° C. to 900° C., as indicated in the process section of Table 1, and soaked at that temperature for between 10 to 60 minutes, as indicated in the process section of Table 1. The resulting foam glass was annealed to room temperature and de-molded.
The characteristics of the resulting foam glass for Examples 1 to 7 herein are indicated in the characteristics portion of Table 1. The resulting foam glass had a density of about 30 and 70 lb./cu. ft., as indicated in the characteristics section of Table 1, and a completely glazed surface. The pore structure was uniform with average pore sizes as indicated in the characteristics section of Table 1. As Table 1 shows, tiles with smaller pore sizes, high density and uniform structures provided have the greatest tensile and compression strength. In order to determine the strength of the samples of foam glass prepared, an effort was made to follow the standard ASTM testing procedures for concrete. However, because the samples proved to be substantially stronger than concrete, the procedures had to be modified by reducing the size of the samples in order for the equipment used to actually break the samples. Thus, foam glass blocks were cut into cylinders between 1.0 and 1.5 inches in diameter and less than 5 inches tall for compression measurements without the glazed surface. As indicated in the characteristics portion of Table 1, the compression strength of Examples 5-7 herein were over 10,000 lb./sq. in., a factor of over 2½ times the compression strength of concrete (4,000 lb./sq. in.). Similarly, as indicated in the characteristics portion of Table 1, the tensile strength of Examples 5-7 herein (corresponding to Examples 7-9 of the '071 Application) were over 1250 lb./sq. in., a factor of over 2½ times the tensile strength of concrete (500 lb./sq. in.). Example 7 herein has a tensile strength of 2500 lb./sq. in., a factor of 5 times the tensile strength of concrete.
A composite assembly 10 as shown in
One of the tension gauges 14 was removed from a side of the tile 12 which was not covered by a tension bolt. The assembly was then tested for its tension strength by placing the opposite side of tile 12 on two knife edges (i.e., rounded cylinders), with a third knife edge being placed in the top center of the side where the tension gauge 14 was removed. The tension bolts remained on the other two sides of tile 12. A constant rate of displacement was then applied on the top knife edge, and the resulting force was measured. The same type of analysis was also performed on another piece of Example 7 which was 1.58 cm×4.76 cm surface and the results were compared.
F2, rescaled=F2(w1/w2)(h1/h2)2 (1)
where F2, rescaled is the rescaled Force, F2 is the measured force, w1 is the width of sample 1, w2 is the width of sample 2, h1 is the height of sample 1, and h2 is the height of sample 2.
Significantly, as can be seen from
Now that the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described in detail, various modifications and improvements thereon will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the spirit and scope of the present invention is to be construed broadly and limited only by the appended claims and not by the foregoing specification.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 154393 | Hill | Aug 1874 | A |
| 299598 | Totman | Jun 1884 | A |
| 312375 | Orr | Feb 1885 | A |
| 545984 | Smith | Sep 1895 | A |
| 683195 | Beam | Sep 1901 | A |
| 1529895 | La Chance et al. | Mar 1925 | A |
| 1714949 | Collier et al. | May 1929 | A |
| 2075633 | Anderegg | Mar 1937 | A |
| 2281524 | Meyers | Apr 1942 | A |
| 2466613 | Richardson | Apr 1949 | A |
| 2620597 | Ford | Dec 1952 | A |
| 2758937 | Ford | Aug 1956 | A |
| 2991591 | Dennis et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
| 3056184 | Blaha | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3124637 | Heitzer | Mar 1964 | A |
| 3186816 | Wartenberg | Jun 1965 | A |
| 3269887 | Windecker | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3273833 | Windecker | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3292316 | Zeinetz | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3321414 | Vieli | May 1967 | A |
| 3325341 | Shannon | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3328229 | Windecker | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3396922 | Windecker | Aug 1968 | A |
| 3396923 | Windecker | Aug 1968 | A |
| 3416756 | Windecker | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3427689 | Windecker | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3430397 | Ellis | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3448546 | Windecker | Jun 1969 | A |
| 3459565 | Jones et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
| 3467345 | Windecker | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3493460 | Windecker | Feb 1970 | A |
| 3518156 | Windecker | Jun 1970 | A |
| 3519228 | Windecker | Jul 1970 | A |
| 3533880 | Windecker | Oct 1970 | A |
| 3537220 | Ellis | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3549449 | Windecker | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3559361 | Sarros | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3592619 | Elmer et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3607595 | Windecker | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3614967 | Royston | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3666850 | Windecker | May 1972 | A |
| 3674585 | Windecker | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3712010 | Porter et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3811851 | MacKenzie | May 1974 | A |
| 3848335 | Bergersen | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3951632 | Seki et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3959541 | King et al. | May 1976 | A |
| 3979217 | Sutton | Sep 1976 | A |
| 3986311 | Muhe et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4024309 | Pender | May 1977 | A |
| 4051296 | Windecker | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4058943 | Sturgill | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4119422 | Rostoker | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4119583 | Filip et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4124365 | Williams et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4178162 | Shono et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4196251 | Windecker | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4198224 | Kirkpatrick | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4232069 | Windecker | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4259118 | Sack | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4283457 | Kolsky et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4324037 | Grady, II | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4332907 | Vieli | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4332908 | Vieli | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4347326 | Iwami et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4424280 | Malric | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4430108 | Hojaji et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4432172 | Kuykendall et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4440296 | Howe et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4450656 | Lagendijk | May 1984 | A |
| 4571321 | Kijowski et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4595710 | Albertelli et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4623585 | Linton et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4628652 | Wefels | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4694622 | Richard | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4710415 | Slosberg et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4758538 | Satoh et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4798758 | Nagano et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4833015 | Furuuchi et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4875314 | Boilen | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4879159 | Furuuchi | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4903446 | Richards et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4953332 | Galloway | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4987028 | Kandachi et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4990398 | Fukumoto et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4992321 | Kandachi et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4999959 | Virtanen | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5069960 | Fukumoto et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5097558 | Accorsi et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5151228 | Vahlbrauk | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5188649 | Macedo et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5231811 | Andrepont et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5451465 | Garrioch | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5476692 | Ellis et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5514198 | Bayle et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5516351 | Solomon et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5588977 | Pavlov et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5641815 | Fehlmann | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5763341 | Pavlov et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5809713 | Ray | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5821184 | Haines et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5862640 | Negri | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5881514 | Pryor | Mar 1999 | A |
| 6042905 | Lingart et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6082063 | Shrive et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6133172 | Sevenish et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6174587 | Figge, Sr. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6195949 | Schuyler | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6207236 | Araki et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212840 | Davidovitz | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6468613 | Kitano et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6721684 | Saebi | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6964809 | Hojaji et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6967051 | Augustynowicz et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 20010018836 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020010223 | Botrie | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20030134920 | Poisl et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145534 | Hojaji et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167711 | Lstiburek | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040071960 | Weber et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040079260 | Datta et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040080063 | Datta et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040081827 | Datta et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123535 | Hojaji et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040262801 | Hojaji et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050016093 | Buarque de Macedo | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050019542 | Hojaji et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 03016232 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 2005007989 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 10/076,971, filed Feb. 15, 2002. |
| Written Opinion of ISA for PCT/US04/023030 (mailed Jun. 27, 2006), Macedo. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/273,785, Hojaji, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/625,071, Hojaji, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/736,796, Hojaji, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/607,412, Macedo. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/728,667, Hojaji, et al. |
| McGraw Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 5th ed., 1994 pp. 785 and 904, McGraw Hill, Inc., New York, U.S.A. |
| Glass Online, Illustrated Glass Dictionary, at http://www.glassonline.com/infoserv/dictionary/39.html. |
| Pittsburgh Coming Foamglas Insulation, 2004, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation. |
| Edward G. Nawy, “Prestressed Concrete: A Fundamental Approach,” 1989, pp. 8-13, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. |
| Forest Products Laboratory Wood Plastics, Nov. 1941, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Madison, Wisconsin. |
| J.A. Newlin and G.W. Trayer, Stresses in Wood Members Subjected to Combined Column and Beam Action, Mar. 1956, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Madison, Wisconsin. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 18, 2011. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050016093 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |
