Reference is made to commonly assigned co-pending application Ser. No. 09/751,232, entitled CONTINUOUS INKJET PRINTING METHOD AND APPARATUS and filed Dec. 28, 2000 in the names of David L. Jeanmaire and James M. Chwalek.
The cross-referenced application published Dec. 14, 2001 as European Patent Application No. EP 1219429A2 and is incorporated in this patent application.
The invention relates generally to continuous inkjet printing, and in particular to preventing a defective nozzle ink discharge in a continuous inkjet printhead from being used for printing.
Typically in continuous inkjet printers, a pressurized ink is formed into continuous inkjet filaments projecting from multiple ink discharge nozzles in a printhead. Filament stimulation sources such as ink heaters or transducers operate as ink droplet generators each time they are activated, by causing filament end-lengths to be broken off at the respective nozzles to provide discrete ink droplets which, in turn, are deposited on a print medium moving relative to the printhead. The interval between successive droplet break-offs at any one nozzle matches the interval between successive activations of the filament stimulation source for that nozzle. The longer the interval between successive activations of the filament stimulation source for the nozzle, the longer the opportunity for the continuous inkjet filament to increase lengthwise at the nozzle and the larger the ink droplet. Conversely, the shorter the interval between successive activations of the filament stimulation source for the nozzle, the shorter the opportunity for the continuous inkjet filament to increase lengthwise at the nozzle and the smaller the ink droplet. Thus, the volume of the ink droplet, when a droplet break-off occurs at the nozzle, corresponds to the frequency of activation of the filament stimulation source for the nozzle.
Successive ink droplets can be altered between printing and non-printing trajectories or paths. Those ink droplets that are in a printing trajectory are allowed to reach the print medium. Those ink droplets that are in a non-printing trajectory can be collected in a ink gutter or catcher and then recycled.
A problem that exists is that dirt or dried ink can accumulate on a nozzle, particularly in the region where the continuous inkjet filament projects from the nozzle. When this occurs, the nozzle must be considered defective because the ink droplets that result from filament end-lengths being broken off at the nozzle may be misdirected with respect to the printing trajectory that the ink droplets should take. Consequently, the printed image may be of a lesser quality.
The problem of misdirected ink droplets is particularly acute in continuous inkjet printers because ink flow to form a continuous inkjet filament at a nozzle that is defective cannot be stopped.
According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of preventing all of the ink discharged from a defective one of multiple nozzles in a continuous inkjet printhead from being used for printing on a print medium. Generally speaking, the method comprises:
diverting all of the ink discharged from a defective nozzle from reaching a print medium, and allowing at least some of the ink discharged from other nozzles which are not defective to reach the print medium.
More specifically, the method comprises:
causing the defective nozzle to discharge only non-printing ink droplets, and allowing other nozzles which are not defective to discharge printing ink droplets which are volume-differentiated from non-printing droplets; and
preventing non-printing droplets discharged from the defective nozzle from reaching a print medium, and allowing printing ink droplets discharged from the nozzles that are not defective to reach the print medium.
Further specifically, the method comprises:
periodically heating the defective nozzle at a frequency that is greater than frequencies other nozzles which are not defective are periodically heated, to cause the defective nozzle to only discharge ink droplets that have a smaller volume than ink droplets discharged from the nozzles that are not defective; and
preventing smaller volume droplets discharged from the defective nozzle from reaching a print medium, and allowing larger volume ink droplets discharged from the nozzles that are not defective to reach the print medium.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided apparatus for performing the foregoing method.
The invention is intended to be embodied in a continuous inkjet printer. Because the features of such a printer are generally known, the description which follows is directed in particular only to those elements forming part of or cooperating with the disclosed embodiment of the invention. It is to be understood, however, that other elements not disclosed may take various forms known to a person of ordinary skill in the art.
Coincident with a description of the ink droplet forming mechanism 10 which follows, there is provided a method of preventing all of the ink discharged from a defective one of multiple nozzles in the mechanism from being used for printing on a print medium.
The ink droplet forming assemblage 10 shown in
Multiple ink discharge nozzles or outlets 18 (only five shown in
Respective known ink droplet generators, i.e. filament stimulation sources, which preferably are ink heaters 22, are positioned on the printhead 12 around the ink discharge nozzles 18 as shown in FIG. 1. Each one of the ink heaters 22 is formed in a circular or ring shape and has a similar shape resistive heating element 24 electrically connected to a conductive contact pad 26 via a conductor 28. See
Typically, as shown in
The ink droplets 46 that have the larger volume are intended to be used as printing ink droplets. Conversely, the ink droplets 52 that have the smaller volume are non-printing ink droplets.
As shown in
A problem that exists is that dirt or dried ink can accumulate on at least one of the nozzles 18, particularly in the region where the continuous inkjet filament 32 projects from the nozzle, and also possibly in the vicinity of the heating elements 24. When this occurs, the nozzle 18 must be considered defective because the ink droplets that result from the filament end-lengths 34 being broken off at the nozzle may be misdirected with respect to the printing trajectory 54 that the ink droplets should take. Consequently, the printed image may be of a lesser quality.
The solution to the problem is as follows. As shown in
Like the non-printing ink droplets 52 from a non-defective one of the nozzles 18, the smallest volume ink droplets 72 from a defective nozzle are non-printing ink droplets. Of course, this methodology can be reversed or modified. That is to say, the non-printing ink droplets 52 and 68 might have different volumes that are each larger than the volume of the printing ink droplets 48. Alternatively, the non-printing ink droplets 52 and 68 might have the same volume (but different than the volume of the printing ink droplets 48).
As shown in
Instead of one or both of the air blowers 76 and 62 which divert the non-printing ink droplets 72 and 52 from defective and non-defective nozzles 18 to the non-printing trajectories 74 and 58, a vacuum source can be used to attract the non-printing ink droplets 72 and/or 52 to the respective trajectories. Moreover, instead of the non-printing trajectory 74 being in the same direction as the non-printing trajectory 58, the two non-printing trajectories can be in opposite directions—in which case a second ink gutter, in addition to the ink gutter 60, would be used.
If the non-printing ink droplets 52 and 68 had the same volume (but different than the volume of the printing ink droplets 48), only a single air blower or vacuum source wold be sufficient since the non-printing ink droplets could be diverted to the same non-printing trajectory.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3562757 | Bischoff | Feb 1971 | A |
3596275 | Sweet | Jul 1971 | A |
3709432 | Robertson | Jan 1973 | A |
4097872 | Giordano et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4296418 | Yamazaki et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4297712 | Lammers et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4371878 | Jinnai | Feb 1983 | A |
4849909 | Yamada et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4999644 | Katerberg et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
6003980 | Sheinman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6079821 | Chwalek et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081281 | Cleary et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6217163 | Anagnostopoulos et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6280023 | Ufkes | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6352330 | Lubinsky et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6491362 | Jeanmaire | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6702418 | Satou et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 255 560 | Feb 1988 | EP |
1 219 429 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 219 430 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 243 426 | Sep 2002 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040165038 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |