This application generally related to the field of dental care, and more particularly to a system and a method for manufacturing and constructing physical tooth models.
Orthodontics is the practice of manipulating a patient's teeth to provide better function and appearance. In treatments using fixed appliance, brackets are bonded to a patient's teeth and coupled together with an arched wire. The combination of the brackets and wire provide a force on the teeth causing them to move. Once the teeth have moved to a desired location and are held in a place for a certain period of time, the body adapts bone and tissue to maintain the teeth in the desired location. To further assist in retaining the teeth in the desired location, a patient may be fitted with a retainer.
To achieve tooth movement, orthodontists and dentists typically review patient data such as X-rays and models such as impressions of teeth. They can then determine a desired orthodontic goal for the patient. With the goal in mind, the orthodontists place the brackets and/or bands on the teeth and manually bend (i.e., shape) wire, such that a force is asserted on the teeth to reposition the teeth into the desired positions. As the teeth move towards the desired position, the orthodontist makes continual adjustments based on the progress of the treatment.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,518,397 issued to Andreiko, et. al. provides a method of forming an orthodontic brace. Such a method includes obtaining a model of the teeth of a patient's mouth and a prescription of desired positioning of such teeth. The contour of the teeth of the patient's mouth is determined, from the model. Calculations of the contour and the desired positioning of the patient's teeth are then made to determine the geometry (e.g., grooves or slots) to be provided. Custom brackets including a special geometry are then created for receiving an arch wire to form an orthodontic brace system. Such geometry is intended to provide for the disposition of the arched wire on the bracket in a progressive curvature in a horizontal plane and a substantially linear configuration in a vertical plane. The geometry of the brackets is altered, (e.g., by cutting grooves into the brackets at individual positions and angles and with particular depth) in accordance with such calculations of the bracket geometry. In such a system, the brackets are customized to provide three-dimensional movement of the teeth, once the wire, which has a two dimensional shape (i.e., linear shape in the vertical plane and curvature in the horizontal plane), is applied to the brackets.
Other innovations relating to bracket and bracket placements have also been patented. For example, such patent innovations are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,716 entitled “Orthodontic Bracket and Ligature” a method of ligating arch wires to brackets, U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,405 “Entitled Method for Determining Orthodontic Bracket Placement,” U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,238 entitled “Method of Forming Orthodontic Brace,” and U.S. Pat. No. 5,533,895 entitled “Orthodontic Appliance and Group Standardize Brackets therefore and methods of making, assembling and using appliance to straighten teeth”.
Kuroda et al. (1996) Am. J. Orthodontics 110:365-369 describes a method for laser scanning a plaster dental cast to produce a digital image of the cast. See also U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,605,459. 5,533,895; 5,474,448; 5,454,717; 5,447,432; 5,431,562; 5,395,238; 5,368,478; and 5,139,419, assigned to Ormco Corporation, describe methods for manipulating digital images of teeth for designing orthodontic appliances.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,405 describes a method for digitally imaging a tooth and determining optimum bracket positioning for orthodontic treatment. Laser scanning of a molded tooth to produce a three-dimensional model is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,338,198. U.S. Pat. No. 5,452,219 describes a method for laser scanning a tooth model and milling a tooth mold. Digital computer manipulation of tooth contours is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,305 and 5,587,912. Computerized digital imaging of the arch is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,342,202 and 5,340,309.
Other patents of interest include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,549,476; 5,382,164; 5,273,429; 4,936,862; 3,860,803; 3,660,900; 5,645,421; 5,055,039; 4,798,534; 4,856,991; 5,035,613; 5,059,118; 5,186,623; and 4,755,139.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,431,562 to Andreiko et al. describes a computerized, appliance-driven approach to orthodontics. In this method, first certain shape information of teeth is acquired. A uniplanar target arcform is calculated from the shape information. The shape of customized bracket slots, the bracket base, and the shape of the orthodontic archwire, are calculated in accordance with a mathematically-derived target archform. The goal of the Andreiko et al. method is to give more predictability, standardization, and certainty to orthodontics by replacing the human element in orthodontic appliance design with a deterministic, mathematical computation of a target arch form and appliance design. Hence the '562 patent teaches away from an interactive, computer-based system in which the orthodontist remains fully involved in patient diagnosis, appliance design, and treatment planning and monitoring.
More recently, removable appliances from companies such as Align Technology, Inc. began offering transparent, removable aligning devices as a new treatment modality in orthodontics. In this system, an impression model of the dentition of the patient is obtained by the orthodontist and shipped to a remote appliance manufacturing center, where it is scanned with a CT scanner. A computer model of the dentition in a target situation is generated at the appliance manufacturing center and made available for viewing to the orthodontist over the Internet. The orthodontist indicates changes they wish to make to individual tooth positions. Later, another virtual model is provided over the Internet and the orthodontist reviews the revised model, and indicates any further changes. After several such iterations, the target situation is agreed upon. A series of removable aligning devices or shells are manufactured and delivered to the orthodontist. The shells, in theory, will move the patient's teeth to the desired or target position.
The practice of orthodontics and other dental treatments including preparation of a denture can benefit from a physical dental arch model that is representative of the dentition and the alveolar ridge of a patient to be orthodontically treated. The physical dental arch model, also referred as a physical dental arch model, is often prepared based on an impression model. The physical dental arch model is generally prepared by cutting and arranging individual teeth on the alveolar ridge of the impression model. With this physical dental arch model so prepared, not only is a final goal for the dental treatment made clear, but also the occlusal condition between the maxillary and the mandibular dentitions can be specifically ascertained.
Also, the patient when the physical dental arch model is presented can visually ascertain the possible final result of orthodontic treatment he or she will receive and, therefore, the physical dental arch model is a convenient presentation tool to the patient.
Making a model for a whole or a large portion of an arch is more difficult than making one tooth abutment for implant purposes. Single tooth does not have the concavities and complexities as in the inter-proximal areas of teeth in an arch. Some prior art making the physical dental arch model is carried out manually, involving not only a substantial amount of labor required, but also a substantial amount of time. It is also difficult to machine an accurate arch model because of the various complex shapes and the complex features such as inter-proximal areas, wedges between teeth, among others, in an arch.
Another issue with the assembling of tooth models into a physical dental arch model is that the adjacent tooth models can sometimes interfere with each other during an orthodontic treatment. The interference can occur between the tooth portions of the two neighboring tooth models when they are inserted into a base plate, or between the pins that assist them to be mounted onto a base plate.
Systems and methods provide a practical, effective and efficient methods and apparatus to manufacture and construct the physical dental arch model.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method for preventing interference between two physical tooth models in a physical dental arch model, comprising:
acquiring the coordinates of a plurality of points on the surfaces of each of the two physical tooth models;
digitally representing the surfaces of each of the two physical tooth models by a mesh of points in three dimensions using the acquired coordinates, wherein the meshes representing the surfaces of the two physical tooth models intersect at least at one point to form an overlapping portion; and
calculating the depth of the overlapping portion between the two meshes to quantify the interference of the two physical tooth models.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method for preventing interference between two physical tooth models in a physical dental arch model, comprising:
acquiring the coordinates of a plurality of points on the surfaces of each of the two physical tooth models;
digitally representing the surfaces of each of the two physical tooth models by a mesh of points in three dimensions using the acquired coordinates, wherein the meshes representing the surfaces of the two physical tooth models intersect at least at one point to form an overlapping portion;
calculating the depth of the overlapping portion between the two meshes; and
adjusting the positions or the orientations of at least one of the two physical tooth models in accordance with the depth of the overlapping portion between the two physical tooth models to prevent the interference between the physical tooth models.
In yet another aspect, the present invention relates to a method for preventing interference between two physical tooth models in a physical dental arch model, comprising:
acquiring the coordinates of a plurality of points on the surfaces of each of the two physical tooth models;
digitally representing the surfaces of each of the two physical tooth models by a mesh of points in three dimensions using the acquired coordinates;
interpolating each of the two meshes to produce one or more surfaces to represent the boundaries of one of the two physical tooth models, wherein the interpolated surfaces intersect at least at one point to form an overlapping portion; and
calculating the depth of the overlapping portion between the two interpolated surfaces to quantify the interference of the two physical tooth models.
Embodiments may include one or more of the following advantages. An advantage of the present invention is that adjacent physical tooth models in a physical dental arch model can be simulated. The interference between the two physical models can be predicted before they are assembled to form a physical arch model. The positions and the orientations of the tooth models can be adjusted to prevent the interference. As a result, the precision and effectiveness of the orthodontic treatments are improved.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the physical tooth models can be used to form different tooth arch models having different teeth configurations. The pin configurations can be modified without changing the tooth models themselves to be modified to prevent interference between adjacent tooth models at different steps of an orthodontic treatment. Moreover, the tooth models can be reused as tooth positions are changed during a treatment process. Much of the cost of making multiple tooth arch models in orthodontic treatment are therefore eliminated. The tooth models can have pins that assist their assembling with a base.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the same base can support different tooth arch models having different teeth configurations. The base can include more than one sets of receiving features that can receive tooth models at different positions. The reusable base further reduces cost in the dental treatment of teeth alignment. Furthermore, the receiving features can be modified to receive tooth models having different pin configurations to avoid interference between the adjacent tooth models in a tooth arch model.
The physical tooth models include features to allow them to be attached, plugged or locked to a base. The physical tooth models can be pre-fabricated having standard registration and attaching features for assembling. The physical tooth models can be automatically assembled onto a base by a robotic arm under computer control.
The physical dental arch model obtained by the disclosed system and methods can be used for various dental applications such as dental crown, dental bridge, aligner fabrication, biometrics, and teeth whitening. The arch model can be assembled from segmented manufacturable components that can be individually manufactured by automated, precise numerical manufacturing techniques.
The physical tooth models in the physical dental arch model can be easily separated, repaired or replaced, and reassembled after the assembly without the replacement of the whole arch model. The manufacturable components can be attached to a base. The assembled physical dental arch model specifically corresponds to the patient's arch. There is no need for complex and costly mechanisms such as micro-actuators for adjusting multiple degrees of freedom for each tooth model. The described methods and system is simple to make and easy to use.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawing and in the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
The accompanying drawing, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention:
Major operations in producing a physical dental arch model are illustrated in
Details of process in
In an alternative approach, the negative impression of the patient's arch is placed in a specially designed container. A casting material is then poured into the container over the impression to create a model. A lid is subsequently placed over the container. The container is opened and the mold can be removed after the specified time.
Examples of casting materials include auto polymerizing acrylic resin, thermoplastic resin, light-polymerized acrylic resins, polymerizing silicone, polyether, plaster, epoxies, or a mixture of materials. The casting material is selected based on the uses of the cast. The material should be easy for cutting to obtain individual tooth model. Additionally, the material needs to be strong enough for the tooth model to take the pressure in pressure form for producing a dental aligner. Details of making a dental aligner are disclosed in commonly assigned and above referenced US Patent Application titled “Method and apparatus for manufacturing and constructing a dental aligner” by Huafeng Wen, filed Nov. 2, 2004, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Features that can allow tooth models to be attached to a base (step 120) can be added to the casting material in the casting process. Registration points or pins can be added to each tooth before the casting material is dried. Optionally, universal joints can be inserted at the top of the casting chamber using specially designed lids, which would hang the universal joints directly into the casting area for each tooth.
Still in step 110, individual tooth models are next cut from the arch positive. One requirement for cutting is to obtain individual teeth in such a manner that they can be joined again to form a tooth arch. The separation of individual teeth from the mold can be achieved using a number of different cutting methods including laser cutting and mechanical sawing.
Separating the positive mold of the arch into tooth models may result in the loss of the relative 3D coordinates of the individual tooth models in an arch. Several methods are provided in step 120 for finding relative position of the tooth models. In one embodiment, unique registration features are added to each pair of tooth models before the positive arch mold is separated. The separated tooth models can be assembled to form a physical dental arch model by matching tooth models having the same unique registration marks.
The positive arch mold can also be digitized by a three-dimensional scanning using a technique such as laser scanning, optical scanning, destructive scanning, CT scanning and Sound Wave Scanning. A digital dental arch model is therefore obtained. The digital dental arch model is subsequently smoothened and segmented. Each segment can be physically fabricated by CNC based manufacturing to obtain individual tooth models. The digital dental arch model tracks and stores the positions of the individual tooth models. Unique registration marks can be added to the digital tooth models that can be made into a physical feature in CNC base manufacturing.
Examples of CNC based manufacturing include CNC based milling, Stereolithography, Laminated Object Manufacturing, Selective Laser Sintering, Fused Deposition Modeling, Solid Ground Curing, 3D ink jet printing. Details of fabricating tooth models are disclosed in commonly assigned and above referenced US Patent Application titled “Method and apparatus for manufacturing and constructing a physical dental arch mode” by Huafeng Wen, filed Nov. 2, 2004, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In another embodiment, the separated tooth models are assembled by geometry matching. The intact positive arch impression is first scanned to obtain a 3D digital dental arch model. Individual teeth are then scanned to obtain digital tooth models for individual teeth. The digital tooth models can be matched using rigid body transformations to match a digital dental arch model. Due to complex shape of the arch, inter-proximal areas, root of the teeth and gingival areas may be ignored in the geometry match. High precision is required for matching features such as cusps, points, crevasses, the front and back faces of the teeth. Each tooth is sequentially matched to result in rigid body transformations corresponding to the tooth positions that can reconstruct an arch.
In another embodiment, the separated tooth models are assembled and registered with the assistance of a 3D point picking devices. The coordinates of the tooth models are picked up by 3D point picking devices such as stylus or Microscribe devices before separation. Unique registration marks can be added on each tooth model in an arch before separation. The tooth models and the registration marks can be labeled by unique IDs. The tooth arch can later be assembled by identifying tooth models having the same registration marks as were picked from the Jaw. 3D point picking devices can be used to pick the same points again for each tooth model to confirm the tooth coordinates.
The base is designed in step 130 to receive the tooth models. The base and tooth models include complimentary features to allow them to be assembled together. The tooth model has a protruding structure attached to it. The features at the base and tooth models can also include a registration slot, a notch, a protrusion, a hole, an interlocking mechanism, and a jig. The protruding structure can be obtained during the casting process or be created after casting by using a CNC machine on each tooth. The positions of the receiving features in the base is determined by either the initial positions of the teeth in an arch or the desired teeth positions during a treatment process (step 140).
The digital tooth models are developed in step 150. First, the surfaces of the two physical tooth models are measured. A negative impression of a patient's teeth is obtained. A plurality of points on the surfaces of the negative impression is measured by a position measurement device. The coordinates of the points in three dimensional space are obtained. Details of measuring the surface positions of dental impression's surfaces are disclosed in the above referenced and commonly assigned U.S. Patent Application, titled “Producing a base for accurately receiving dental tooth models” by Huafeng Wen, and filed November 2004, and the above referenced and commonly assigned U.S. Patent Application, titled “Producing accurate base for dental arch model” by Huafeng Wen, filed November 2004.
The plurality of points representing the surfaces of the negative impression is then used to construct a mesh to digitally represent the surfaces of the patient's teeth in three dimensions.
The interference between two physical tooth models representing the patient's teeth can be predicted using the digital models of the two patient's teeth, in step 160. First buffer widths are calculated for each digital tooth model. As shown in
An orthogonal bounding box 1800 can be set up as shown in
The intervals of the grid 1900 along x and y direction, shown in
The interference between two physical tooth models to be fabricated based on the digital tooth models can be predicted using the corresponding digital tooth models. As shown in
The simulation of the interference between digital tooth models serves as prediction of the interference between the physical tooth models after they are fabricated and assembled to form a physical dental base mode. The knowledge of the interference between the physical tooth models can be used to prevent such interference to occur. One way to prevent such interference is by adjusting features affixed to the physical tooth models. Another method to prevent the interference is the adjust teeth positions in a dental arch model. Both methods are valuable to an orthodontic treatment.
The tooth models can be affixed with one or more pins at their bottom portions for the tooth models to be inserted into the base. The two adjacent tooth models can interfere with each other when they are inserted into a base. The pin configurations are selected in step 170 to prevent interference between adjacent tooth models.
Two adjacent tooth models 1010 and 1020 are shown in
In accordance with the present invention, the interference between adjacent tooth models mounted on an arch can be resolved by properly designing and selecting configurations of the pins affixed to the bottom portion of the tooth models.
The pin configurations for tooth models can be selected by different methods. In one embodiment, a digital dental arch model that represents the physical tooth model is first produced or received. The digital dental arch model defines the positions and orientations of the two adjacent physical tooth models in the physical dental arch model according to the requirement of the orthodontic treatment. The positions of the physical tooth models including the pins are simulated to examine the interference between two adjacent physical tooth models mounted on the base. The pin configurations are adjusted to avoid any interference that might occur in the simulation. The pin configurations can include pins lengths, pin positions at the underside of the tooth models, and the number of pins for each tooth model.
The tooth models affixed with pins having the selected pin configurations can fabricated by Computer Numerical Control (CNC) based manufacturing in response to the digital dental arch model. At different steps of an orthodontic treatment, the tooth portions of the tooth models can remain the same while the pins affixed to the tooth portion being adjusted depending on the relative orientation of positions between adjacent tooth models. Furthermore, the base can include different socket configurations adapted to receive compatible pin configurations selected for different steps of the orthodontic treatment. The physical tooth models and their pin configurations can be labeled by a predetermined sequence to define the positions of the physical tooth models on the base for each step of the orthodontic treatment.
An advantage of the present invention is that the different pin configurations allow longer pins affixed to the tooth models, which results in more stable physical tooth arch model. Another advantage is that the tooth portion of the tooth models can be reused for different steps of an orthodontic treatment. Modular sockets can be prepared on the underside of the tooth models. Pins of different lengths can be plugged into the sockets to prevent interference between adjacent tooth models.
Before casting the arch from the impression, the base plate is taken through a CNC process to create the female structures for each individual tooth (step 180). Then the base is placed over the casting container in which the impression is already present and the container is filled with epoxy. The epoxy gets filled up in the female structures and the resulting mold has the male studs present with each tooth model that can be separated afterwards.
Alternatively, as shown in
Male protrusion features over the tooth model can exist in a number of arrangements.
As shown
Another of a base 850 is shown in
A tooth model 900 compatible with the base 800 is shown in
In another embodiment, the disclosed methods and system can include teeth duplicate with removable or retractable pins, as shown in
In another embodiment, the tooth model 1510 includes holes 1520. Pins 1540 and 1550 can be inserted into the holes 1520 in spring load mechanisms 1530, 1540. The pins 1540 are retractable with compressed springs to avoid interference during insertion or after the installation of the tooth model over the base. After the tooth models are properly mounted and fixed, the pins 1540 can extend to their normal positions to maximize position and angle control. The overall pin lengths can be cut to the correct lengths to be compatible with the spring load mechanisms to prevent interference between tooth models.
The described methods are also applicable to prevent tooth model interference in precision mount of tooth models in casting chambers. In such cases, the shape and the height of the tooth models can be modified to avoid interference of teeth during insertion or at the corresponding treatment positions.
A tooth arch model is obtained after the tooth models are assembled to the base 800 (step 190). The base 800 can comprise a plurality of configurations in the female sockets 810. Each of the configurations is adapted to receive the same physical tooth models to form a different arrangement of at least a portion of a tooth arch model.
The base 800 can be fabricated by a system that includes a computer device adapted to store digital tooth models representing the physical tooth models. As described above, the digital tooth model can be obtained by various scanning techniques. A computer processor can then generate a digital base model compatible with the digital tooth models. An apparatus fabricates the base using CNC based manufacturing in accordance with the digital base model. The base fabricated is adapted to receive the physical tooth models.
The physical tooth models can be labeled by a predetermined sequence that defines the positions of the physical tooth models on the base 800. The labels can include a barcode, a printed symbol, hand-written symbol, a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID). The female sockets 810 can also be labeled by the parallel sequence for the physical tooth models.
In one embodiment, tooth models can be separated and repaired after the base. The tooth models can be removed, repaired or replaced, and re-assembled without the replacement of the whole arch model.
Common materials for the tooth models include polymers, urethane, epoxy, plastics, plaster, stone, clay, acrylic, metals, wood, paper, ceramics, and porcelain. The base can comprise a material such as polymers, urethane, epoxy, plastics, plaster, stone, clay, acrylic, metals, wood, paper, ceramics, porcelain, glass, and concrete.
The arch model can be used in different dental applications such as dental crown, dental bridge, aligner fabrication, biometrics, and teeth whitening. For aligner fabrication, for example, each stage of the teeth treatment may correspond a unique physical dental arch model. Aligners can be fabricated using different physical dental arch models one at a time as the teeth movement progresses during the treatment. At each stage of the treatment, the desirable teeth positions for the next stage are calculated. A physical dental arch model having modified teeth positions is fabricated using the process described above. A new aligner is made using the new physical dental arch model.
In accordance with the present invention, each base is specific to an arch configuration. There is no need for complex and costly mechanisms such as micro-actuators for adjusting multiple degrees of freedom for each tooth model. The described methods and system is simple to make and easy to use.
The described methods and system are also economic. Different stages of the arch model can share the same tooth models. The positions for the tooth models at each stage of the orthodontic treatment can be modeled using orthodontic treatment software. Each stage of the arch model may use a separate base. Or alternatively, one base can be used in a plurality of stages of the arch models. The base may include a plurality of sets of receptive positions for the tooth models. Each set corresponds to one treatment stage. The tooth models can be reused through the treatment process. Much of the cost of making multiple tooth arch models in orthodontic treatment are therefore eliminated.
Although specific embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated in the accompanying drawings and described in the foregoing detailed description, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions without departing from the scope of the invention. The following claims are intended to encompass all such modifications.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/907,106, filed Feb. 27, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,524,880, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/369,145, filed Dec. 5, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,943,382, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/641,926, filed Mar. 9, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,536,020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/241,090, filed Sep. 22, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,011,149, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/933,350, filed Oct. 31, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,047,846, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,154, filed Dec. 14, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,309,230, the entire contents of each are herein incorporated by reference. The present invention is also related to commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,152, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,922,490, titled “Base for physical dental arch model” by Huafeng Wen, filed Dec. 14, 2004, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/012,924, titled “Accurately producing a base for physical dental arch model” by Huafeng Wen, filed Dec. 14, 2004, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,145, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,636,513, titled “Fabricating a base compatible with physical dental tooth models” by Huafeng Wen, filed Dec. 14, 2004, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,156, titled “Producing non-interfering tooth models on a base” by Huafeng Wen, filed Dec. 14, 2004, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,160, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,435,084, titled “System and methods for casting physical tooth model” by Huafeng Wen, filed Dec. 14, 2004, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,159, titled “Producing a base for accurately receiving dental tooth models” by Huafeng Wen, and filed Dec. 14, 2004, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,157, titled “Producing accurate base for dental arch model” by Huafeng Wen, filed Dec. 14, 2004. The present invention is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/979,823, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,384,266, titled “Method and apparatus for manufacturing and constructing a physical dental arch model” by Huafeng Wen, filed Nov. 2, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,384,266, issued Jun. 10, 2008, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/979,497, titled “Method and apparatus for manufacturing and constructing a dental aligner” by Huafeng Wen, Nov. 2, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/979,504, titled “Producing an adjustable physical dental arch model” by Huafeng Wen, filed Nov. 2, 2004, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/979,824, titled “Producing a base for physical dental arch model” by Huafeng Wen, Nov. 2, 2004. The disclosure of these related applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2467432 | Kesling | Apr 1949 | A |
3407500 | Kesling | Oct 1968 | A |
3600808 | Reeve et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3660900 | Andrews et al. | May 1972 | A |
3683502 | Wallshein et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3738005 | Cohen et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3860803 | Levine | Jan 1975 | A |
3916526 | Schudy | Nov 1975 | A |
3922786 | Lavin | Dec 1975 | A |
3950851 | Bergersen | Apr 1976 | A |
3983628 | Acevedo | Oct 1976 | A |
4014096 | Dellinger | Mar 1977 | A |
4195046 | Kesling et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4253828 | Coles et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4324546 | Heitlinger et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4324547 | Arcan et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4348178 | Kurz | Sep 1982 | A |
4478580 | Barrut et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4500294 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4504225 | Yoshii | Mar 1985 | A |
4505673 | Yoshii et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4526540 | Dellinger et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4575330 | Hull et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4575805 | Moermann et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4591341 | Andrews et al. | May 1986 | A |
4609349 | Cain et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4611288 | Duret et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4656860 | Orthuber et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4663720 | Duret et al. | May 1987 | A |
4664626 | Kesling et al. | May 1987 | A |
4676747 | Kesling et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4742464 | Duret et al. | May 1988 | A |
4755139 | Abbatte et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763791 | Halverson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4793803 | Martz et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4798534 | Breads et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4836778 | Baumrind et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4837732 | Brandestini et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4850864 | Diamond et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4850865 | Napolitano et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4856991 | Breads et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4877398 | Kesling et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4880380 | Martz et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4889238 | Batchelor et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4890608 | Steer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4935635 | O'Harra et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936862 | Walker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4937928 | Van et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4941826 | Loran et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4964770 | Steinbichler et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4975052 | Spencer et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4983334 | Adell et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5011405 | Lemchen | Apr 1991 | A |
5017133 | Miura et al. | May 1991 | A |
5027281 | Rekow et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035613 | Breads et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5055039 | Abbatte et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059118 | Breads et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5100316 | Wildman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5121333 | Riley et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5125832 | Kesling | Jun 1992 | A |
5128870 | Erdman et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5130064 | Smalley et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131843 | Hilgers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131844 | Marinaccio et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5139419 | Andreiko et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5145364 | Martz et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5176517 | Truax et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5184306 | Erdman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186623 | Breads et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5257203 | Riley et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5273429 | Rekow et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5278756 | Lemchen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5328362 | Watson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5338198 | Wu et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340309 | Robertson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342202 | Deshayes et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368478 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5382164 | Stern et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5395238 | Andreiko et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5431562 | Andreiko et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440326 | Quinn et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5440496 | Andersson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447432 | Andreiko et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452219 | Dehoff et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454717 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456600 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5474448 | Andreiko et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
RE35169 | Lemchen et al. | Mar 1996 | E |
5518397 | Andreiko et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528735 | Strasnick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533895 | Andreiko et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542842 | Andreiko et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549476 | Stern et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562448 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
5587912 | Andersson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5605459 | Kuroda et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607305 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614075 | Andre, Sr. et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5621648 | Crump et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5645420 | Bergersen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645421 | Slootsky et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655653 | Chester et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5683243 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692894 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5725376 | Poirier et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725378 | Wang et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733126 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740267 | Echerer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742700 | Yoon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5799100 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800174 | Andersson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823778 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5848115 | Little et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857853 | Van et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866058 | Batchelder et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879158 | Doyle et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880961 | Crump et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880962 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5934288 | Avila et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957686 | Anthony et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964587 | Sato et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971754 | Sondhi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975893 | Chishti et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015289 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6044309 | Honda et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049743 | Baba et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6062861 | Andersson | May 2000 | A |
6068482 | Snow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6099314 | Kopelman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123544 | Cleary | Sep 2000 | A |
6152731 | Jordan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6183248 | Chishti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190165 | Andreiko et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6217325 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217334 | Hultgren et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227851 | Chishti | May 2001 | B1 |
6244861 | Andreiko et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6309215 | Phan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315553 | Sachdeva et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322359 | Jordan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350120 | Sachdeva et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6382975 | Poirier et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398548 | Muhammad et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402707 | Ernst et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6482298 | Bhatnagar et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6524101 | Phan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6554611 | Shishti et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6572372 | Phan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629840 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6705863 | Phan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722880 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7293988 | Wen | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309230 | Wen | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7309320 | Schmehl | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335024 | Wen | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7993134 | Wen | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7993136 | Wen | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8047846 | Wen | Nov 2011 | B2 |
9011149 | Wen | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9536020 | Wen | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9943382 | Wen et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10524880 | Wen | Jan 2020 | B2 |
20020006597 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020150859 | Imgrund | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030009252 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030139834 | Nikolskiy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030224311 | Cronauer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040110110 | Chishti | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128010 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040214128 | Sachdeva et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050055118 | Nikolskiy et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050095562 | Sporbert | May 2005 | A1 |
20050177266 | Kopelman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20120028220 | Wen | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3031677 | May 1979 | AU |
517102 | Jul 1981 | AU |
5598894 | Jun 1994 | AU |
1121955 | Apr 1982 | CA |
2749802 | May 1978 | DE |
69327661 | Jul 2000 | DE |
0091876 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0299490 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0376873 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0490848 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0541500 | May 1993 | EP |
0667753 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0774933 | Dec 2000 | EP |
0731673 | May 2001 | EP |
463897 | Jan 1980 | ES |
2369828 | Jun 1978 | FR |
2652256 | Mar 1991 | FR |
1550777 | Aug 1979 | GB |
S5358191 | May 1978 | JP |
H0428359 | Jan 1992 | JP |
H08508174 | Sep 1996 | JP |
WO-9008512 | Aug 1990 | WO |
WO-9104713 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO-9410935 | May 1994 | WO |
WO-9832394 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9844865 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-9858596 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
AADR. American Association for Dental Research, Summary of Activities, Mar. 20-23, 1980, Los Angeles, CA, p. 195. |
Alcaniz, et al., “An Advanced System for the Simulation and Planning of Orthodontic Treatments,” Karl Heinz Hohne and Ron Kikinis (eds.), Visualization in Biomedical Computing, 4th Intl. Conf., VBC '96, Hamburg, Germany, Sep. 22-25, 1996, Springer-Verlag, pp. 511-520. |
Alexander et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station Part 2 Clinical Management,” JCO, pp. 402-407 (Jul. 1990). |
Altschuler, “3D Mapping of Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis,” AADR Abstract #607, 2 pages total, (1980). |
Altschuler et al., “Analysis of 3-D Data for Comparative 3-D Serial Growth Pattern Studies of Oral-Facial Structures,” IADR Abstracts, Program and Abstracts of Papers, 57th General Session, IADR Annual Session, Mar. 29, 1979-Apr. 1, 1979, New Orleans Marriot, Journal of Dental Research, vol. 58, Jan. 1979, Special Issue A, p. 221. |
Altschuler et al., “Laser Electro-Optic System for Rapid Three-Dimensional (3D) Topographic Mapping of Surfaces,” Optical Engineering, 20(6):953-961 (1981). |
Altschuler et al., “Measuring Surfaces Space-Coded by a Laser-Projected Dot Matrix,” SPIE Imaging Applications for Automated Industrial Inspection and Assembly, vol. 182, p. 187-191 (1979). |
Andersson et al., “Clinical Results with Titanium Crowns Fabricated with Machine Duplication and Spark Erosion,” Acta. Odontol. Scand., 47:279-286 (1989). |
Andrews, The Six Keys to Optimal Occlusion Straight Wire, Chapter 3, pp. 13-24 (1989). |
Bartels, et al., An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 422-425 (1987). |
Baumrind, “A System for Craniofacial Mapping Through the Integration of Data from Stereo X-Ray Films and Stereo Photographs,” an invited paper submitted to the 1975 American Society of Photogram Symposium on Close-Range Photogram Systems, University of Ill., Aug. 26-30, 1975, pp. 142-166. |
Baumrind et al., “A Stereophotogrammetric System for the Detection of Prosthesis Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” NATO Symposium on Applications of Human Biostereometrics, Jul. 9-13, 1978, SPIE, vol. 166, pp. 112-123. |
Baumrind et al., “Mapping the Skull in 3-D,” reprinted from J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 48(2), 11 pages total, (1972 Fall Issue). |
Baumrind, “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping: Background, Principles, and Perspectives,” Semin. in Orthod., 7(4):223-232 (Dec. 2001). |
Begole et al., “A Computer System for the Analysis of Dental Casts,” The Angle Orthod., 51(3):253-259 (Jul. 1981). |
Bernard et al., “Computerized Diagnosis in Orthodontics for Epidemiological Studies: A Progress Report,” Abstract, J. Dental Res. Special Issue, vol. 67, p. 169, paper presented at International Association for Dental Research 66th General Session, Mar. 9-13, 1988, Montreal, Canada. |
Bhatia et al., “A Computer-Aided Design for Orthognathic Surgery,” Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 22:237-253(1984). |
Biggerstaff, “Computerized Diagnostic Setups and Simulations,” Angle Orthod., 40(1):28-36 (Jan. 1970). |
Biggerstaff et al., “Computerized Analysis of Occlusion in the Postcanine Dentition,” Am. J. Orthod., 61(3): 245-254 (Mar. 1972). |
Biostar Opeation & Training Manual. Great Lakes Orthodontics, Ltd. 199 Fire Tower Drive, Tonawanda, New York. 14150-5890, 20 pages total (1990). |
Blu, et al., “Linear interpolation revitalized”, IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 13(5):710-719 (May 2004. |
Bourke, “Coordinate System Transformation,” (Jun. 1996), p. 1, retrieved from the Internet Nov. 5, 2004, URL< http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/—pbourke/prolection/coords>. |
Boyd et al., “Three Dimensional Diagnosis and Orthodontic Treatment of Complex Malocclusions With the Invisalign Appliance,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):274-293 (Dec. 2001). |
Brandestini et al., “Computer Machined Ceramic Inlays: In Vitro Marginal Adaptation,” J. Dent. Res. Special Issue, Abstract 305, vol. 64, p. 208 (1985). |
Brook et al., “An Image Analysis System for the Determination of Tooth Dimensions from Study Casts: Comparison with Manual Measurements of Mesio-distal Diameter,” J. Dent. Res., 65(3):428-431 (Mar. 1986). |
Burstone et al., Precision Adjustment of the Transpalatal Lingual Arch: Computer Arch Form IN Predetermination, Am, Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 79, No. 2 (Feb. 1981), pp. 115-133. |
Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 1),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(7):442-453 (Jul. 1979). |
Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 2),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(8):539-551 (Aug. 1979). |
Cardinal Industrial Finishes, Powder Coatings information posted at<http://www.cardinalpaint.com> on Aug. 25, 2000, 2 pages. |
Carnaghan, “An Alternative to Holograms for the Portrayal of Human Teeth,” 4th Int'l. Conf. on Holographic Systems, Components and Applications, Sep. 15, 1993, pp. 228-231. |
Chaconas et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station, Part 1, Basic Concepts,” JCO, pp. 360-367 (Jun. 1990). |
Chafetz et al., “Subsidence of the Femoral Prosthesis, A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 201, pp. 60-67 (Dec. 1985). |
Chiappone, (1980). Constructing the Gnathologic Setup and Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 14, pp. 121-133. |
Cottingham, (1969). Gnathologic Clear Plastic Positioner, Am. J. Orthod, vol. 55, pp. 23-31. |
Crawford, “CAD/CAM in the Dental Office: Does It Work?”, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 121-123 (Feb. 1991). |
Crawford, “Computers in Dentistry: Part 1 CAD/CAM: The Computer Moves Chairside,” Part 2 F. Duret—A Man with a Vision, Part 3 The Computer Gives New Vision—Literally, Part 4 Bytes 'N Bites—The Computer Moves from the Front Desk to the Operatory, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 54 (9), pp. 661-666 (1988). |
Crooks, “CAD/CAM Comes to USC,” USC Dentistry, pp. 14-17 (Spring 1990). |
Cureton, Correcting Malaligned Mandibular Incisors with Removable Retainers, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 30, No. 7 (1996) pp. 390-395. |
Curry et al., “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping at the Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory/University of the Pacific,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):258-265 (Dec. 2001). |
Cutting et a/., “Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT-Based Models,” Plast. 77(6):877-885 (Jun. 1986). |
DCS Dental AG, “The CAD/CAM 'DCS Titan System' for Production of Crowns/Bridges,” DSC Production AG, pp. 1-7 (Jan. 1992. |
Definition for gingiva. Dictionary.com p. 1-3. Retrieved from the internet Nov. 5, 2004< http://reference.com/search/search?q=gingiva>. |
Defranco et al., “Three-Dimensional Large Displacement Analysis of Orthodontic Appliances,” J. Biomechanics, 9:793-801 (1976). |
Dental Institute University of Zurich Switzerland, Program for International Symposium JD on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the CEREC-Method, May 1991, 2 pages total. |
Dentrac Corporation, Dentrac document, pp. 4-13 (1992). |
Dent-X posted on Sep. 24, 1998 at< http://www.dent-x.com/DentSim.htm>, 6 pages. |
Doyle, “Digital Dentistry,” Computer Graphics World, pp. 50-52, 54 (Oct. 2000). |
DuraClearTM product information, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab, 1 page (1997). |
Duret et al., “CAD/CAM Imaging in Dentistry,” Curr. Opin. Dent., 1:150-154 (1991). |
Duret et al, “CAD-CAM in Dentistry,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 117:715-720 (Nov. 1988). |
Duret, “The Dental CAD/CAM, General Description of the Project,” Hennson International Product Brochure, 18 pages total, Jan. 1986. |
Duret,“Vers Une Prosthese Informatisee,” (English translation attached), Tonus, vol. 75, pp. 55-57 (Nov. 15, 1985). |
Economides, “The Microcomputer in the Orthodontic Office,” JCO, pp. 767-772 (Nov. 1979). |
Elsasser, Some Observations on the History and Uses of the Kesling Positioner, Am. J. Orthod. (1950) 36:368-374. |
English translation of Japanese Laid-Open Publication No. 63-11148 to inventor T. Ozukuri (Laid-Open on Jan. 18, 1998) pp. 1-7. |
Felton et al., “A Computerized Analysis of the Shape and Stability of Mandibular Arch Form,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(6):478-483 (Dec. 1987). |
Friede et al., “Accuracy of Cephalometric Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery,” Abstract of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:754-760 (1987). |
Futterling et al., “Automated Finite Element Modeling of a Human Mandible with Dental Implants,” JS WSCG '98—Conference Program, retrieved from the Internet:< http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/papers98/Strasser 98.pdf, 8 pages. |
Gao et al., “3-D element Generation for Multi-Connected Complex Dental and Mandibular Structure,” Proc. Intl Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, pp. 267-271 (Jun. 12, 2001). |
GIM-Alldent Deutschland, “Das DUX System: Die Technik,” 2 pages total (2002). |
Gottlieb et al., “JCO Interviews Dr. James A. McNamura, Jr., on the Frankel Appliance: Part 2: Clinical 1-1 Management,”J. Clin. Orthod., 16(6):390-407 (Jun. 1982). |
Grayson, “New Methods for Three Dimensional Analysis of Craniofacial Deformity, Symposium: JW Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,” AAOMS, 3 pages total, (Sep. 13, 1990). |
Guess et al., “Computer Treatment Estimates in Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery,” JCO, pp. 262-28 (Apr. 1989). |
Heaven et al., “Computer-Based Image Analysis of Artificial Root Surface Caries,” Abstracts of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:528 (Apr. 17-21, 1991). |
Highbeam Research, “Simulating Stress Put on Jaw,” Tooling & Production [online], Nov. 1996, n pp. 1-2, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL http://static.highbeam.com/t/toolingampproduction/november011996/simulatingstressputonfa . . . >. |
Hikage, “Integrated Orthodontic Management System for Virtual Three-Dimensional Computer Graphic Simulation and Optical Video Image Database for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning”, Journal of Japan KA Orthodontic Society, Feb. 1987, English translation, pp. 1-38, Japanese version, 46(2), pp. 248-269 (60 pages total). |
Hoffmann, et al., “Role of Cephalometry for Planning of Jaw Orthopedics and Jaw Surgery Procedures,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Informationen, pp. 375-396 (Mar. 1991). |
Hojjatie et al., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Glass-Ceramic Dental Crowns,” J. Biomech., 23(11):1157-1166 (1990). |
Huckins, “CAD-CAM Generated Mandibular Model Prototype from MRI Data,” AAOMS, p. 96 (1999). |
Important Tip About Wearing the Red White & Blue Active Clear Retainer System. Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab. 1 page (1998). |
JCO Interviews, “Craig Andreiko , DDS, MS on the Elan and Orthos Systems,” JCO, pp. 459-468 (Aug. 1994). |
JCO Interviews, “Dr. Homer W. Phillips on Computers in Orthodontic Practice, Part 2,” JCO. 1997; 1983:819-831. |
Jerrold, “The Problem, Electronic Data Transmission and the Law,” AJO-DO, pp. 478-479 (Apr. 1988). |
Jones et al., “An Assessment of the Fit of a Parabolic Curve to Pre- and Post-Treatment Dental Arches,” Br. J. Orthod., 16:85-93 (1989). |
JP Faber et al., “Computerized Interactive Orthodontic Treatment Planning,” Am. J. Orthod., 73(1):36-46 (Jan. 1978). |
Kamada et.al., Case Reports on Tooth Positioners Using LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1984) 26(1): 11-29. |
Kamada et.al., Construction of Tooth Positioners with LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber and Some Case KJ Reports, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1982) 24(1):1-27. |
Kanazawa et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Occlusal Surfaces of Upper Molars in a Dutch Population,” J. Dent Res., 63(11):1298-1301 (Nov. 1984). |
Kesling, Coordinating the Predetermined Pattern and Tooth Positioner with Conventional Treatment, KN Am. J. Orthod. Oral Surg. (1946) 32:285-293. |
Kesling et al., The Philosophy of the Tooth Positioning Appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral surgery. 1945; 31:297-304. |
Kleeman et al., The Speed Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod. (1996) 30:673-680. |
Kochanek, “Interpolating Splines with Local Tension, Continuity and Bias Control,” Computer Graphics, ri 18(3):33-41 (Jul. 1984). KM Oral Surgery (1945) 31 :297-30. |
Kunii et al., “Articulation Simulation for an Intelligent Dental Care System,” Displays 15:181-188 (1994). |
Kuroda et al., Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Analyzing System Using Laser Scanning, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. (1996) 110:365-369. |
Laurendeau, et al., “A Computer-Vision Technique for the Acquisition and Processing of 3-D Profiles of 7 KR Dental Imprints: An Application in Orthodontics,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 10(3):453-461 (Sep. 1991. |
Leinfelder, et al., “A New Method for Generating Ceramic Restorations: a CAD-CAM System,” J. Am. 1-1 Dent. Assoc., 118(6):703-707 (Jun. 1989). |
Manetti, et al., “Computer-Aided Cefalometry and New Mechanics in Orthodontics,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Fortschr Kieferorthop. 44, 370-376 (Nr. 5), 1983. |
Mccann, “Inside the ADA,” J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 118:286-294 (Mar. 1989). |
Mcnamara et al., “Invisible Retainers,” J. Clin. Orthod., pp. 570-578 (Aug. 1985). |
Mcnamara et al., Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition, Needham Press, pp. 347-353 (Jan. 1993). |
Moermann et al., “Computer Machined Adhesive Porcelain Inlays: Margin Adaptation after Fatigue Stress,” IADR Abstract 339, J. Dent. Res., 66(a):763 (1987). |
Moles, “Correcting Mild Malalignments—As Easy As One, Two, Three,” AOA/Pro Corner, vol. 11, No. 1, 2 pages (2002). |
Mormann et al., “Marginale Adaptation von adhasuven Porzellaninlays in vitro,” Separatdruck aus: Schweiz. Mschr. Zahnmed. 95: 1118-1129, 1985. |
Nahoum, “The Vacuum Formed Dental Contour Appliance,” N. Y. State Dent. J., 30(9):385-390 (Nov. 1964). |
Nash, “CEREC CAD/CAM Inlays: Aesthetics and Durability in a Single Appointment,” Dent. Today, 9(8):20, 22-23 (Oct. 1990). |
Nishiyama et al., “A New Construction of Tooth Repositioner by LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber,” J. Nihon Univ. Sch. Dent., 19(2):93-102 (1977). |
Paul et al., “Digital Documentation of Individual Human Jaw and Tooth Forms for Applications in Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and Forensic Medicine” Proc. of the 24th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON '98), Sep. 4, 1998, pp. 2415-2418. |
Pinkham, “Foolish Concept Propels Technology,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Jan./Feb. 1989. |
Pinkham, “Inventor's CAD/CAM May Transform Dentistry,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Sep. 1990. |
Ponitz, “Invisible Retainers,” Am. J. Orthod., 59(3):266-272 (Mar. 1971). |
Procera Research Projects, “Procera Research Projects 1993—Abstract Collection,” pp. 3-7; 28 (1993). |
Proffit et al., Contemporary Orthodontics, (Second Ed.), Chapter 15, Mosby Inc., pp. 470-533 (Oct. 1993. |
Raintree Essix & ARS Materials, Inc., Raintree Essix, Technical Magazine Table of contents and Essix Appliances,< http://www.essix.com/magazine/defaulthtml> Aug. 13, 1997. |
Redmond et al., “Clinical Implications of Digital Orthodontics,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 117(2):240-242 (2000). |
Rekow, “A Review of the Developments in Dental CAD/CAM Systems,” (contains references to Japanese efforts and content of the papers of particular interest to the clinician are indicated with a one line summary of their content in the bibliography), Curr. Opin. Dent., 2:25-33 (Jun. 1992). |
Rekow, “CAD/CAM in Dentistry: A Historical Perspective and View of the Future,” J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 58(4):283, 287-288 (Apr. 1992). |
Rekow, “Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Dentistry: A Review of the State of the Art,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 58(4):512-516 (Oct. 1987). |
Rekow, “Dental CAD-CAM Systems: What is the State of the Art?”, J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 122:43-48 1991. |
Rekow et al., “CAD/CAM for Dental Restorations—Some of the Curious Challenges,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 38(4):314-318 (Apr. 1991). |
Rekow et al., “Comparison of Three Data Acquisition Techniques for 3-D Tooth Surface Mapping,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 13(1):344-345 1991. |
Rekow, “Feasibility of an Automated System for Production of Dental Restorations, Ph.D. Thesis,” Univ. of Minnesota, 244 pages total, Nov. 1988. |
Richmond et al., “The Development of a 3D Cast Analysis System,” Br. J. Orthod., 13(1):53-54 (Jan. 1986). |
Richmond et al., “The Development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Reliability and Validity,” Eur. J. Orthod., 14:125-139 (1992). |
Richmond, “Recording the Dental Cast in Three Dimensions,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(3):199-206 (Sep. 1987). |
Rudge, “Dental Arch Analysis: Arch Form, A Review of the Literature,” Eur. J. Orthod., 3(4):279-284 1981. |
Sakuda et al., “Integrated Information-Processing System in Clinical Orthodontics: An Approach with Use of a Computer Network System,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 101(3): 210-220 (Mar. 1992). |
Schellhas et al., “Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Surgical Planning,” Arch. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 114:438-442 (Apr. 1988). |
Schroeder et al., Eds. The Visual Toolkit, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey (1998) Chapters 6, 8 & 9, (pp. 153-210, 309-354, and 355-428, respectively. |
Shilliday, (1971). Minimizing finishing problems with the mini-positioner, Am. J. Orthod. 59:596-599. |
Siemens, “CEREC—Computer-Reconstruction,” High Tech in der Zahnmedizin, 14 pages total (2004). |
Sinclair, “The Readers' Corner,” J. Clin. Orthod., 26(6):369-372 (Jun. 1992). |
Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, CEREC 3D, Manuel utiiisateur, Version 2.0X (in French), 2003, 114 pages total. |
Stoll et al., “Computer-aided Technologies in Dentistry,” (article summary in English, article in German), Dtsch Zahna'rztl Z 45, pp. 314-322 (1990). |
Sturman, “Interactive Keyframe Animation of 3-D Articulated Models,” Proceedings Graphics Interface '84, May-Jun. 1984, pp. 35-40. |
The Choice is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information, 6 pages (2003). |
The Choice is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No Braces Treatment, Allesee HI Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for doctors. http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/doctorhtml, 5 pages (May 19, 2003). |
The Choice is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee HJ Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, (http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/patients.html), 2 pages (May 19, 2003). |
The Red, White & Blue Way to Improve Your Smile!, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages (1992). |
Truax L., “Truax Clasp-Less(TM) Appliance System,” Funct. Orthod., 9(5):22-4, 26-8 (Sep.-Oct. 1992). |
Tru-Tain Orthodontic & Dental Supplies, Product Brochure, Rochester, Minnesota 55902, 16 pages total (1996). |
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Automated Crown Replication Using Solid Photography SM,” Solid Photography Inc., Melville NY, Oct. 1977, 20 pages total. |
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Holodontography: An Introduction to Dental Laser Holography,” School of Aerospace Medicine Brooks AFB Tex, Mar. 1973, 37 pages total. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/050,342, filed Jun. 20, 1997, 41 pages total. |
Van Der Linden, “A New Method to Determine Tooth Positions and Dental Arch Dimensions,” J. Dent. Res., 51(4):1104 (Jul.-Aug. 1972). |
Van Der Linden et al., “Three-Dimensional Analysis of Dental Casts by Means of the Optocom,” J. Dent. Res., p. 1100 (Jul.-Aug. 1972). |
Van Der Zel, “Ceramic-Fused-to-Metal Restorations with a New CAD/CAM System,” Quintessence Int., 24(11):769-778 (1993. |
Varady et al., “Reverse Engineering of Geometric Models—An Introduction,” Computer-Aided Design, 29(4):255-268, 1997. |
Verstreken et al., “An Image-Guided Planning System for Endosseous Oral Implants,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 17(5):842-852 (Oct. 1998). |
Warunek et al., Physical and Mechanical Properties of Elastomers in Orthodonic Positioners, Am J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop, vol. 95, No. 5, (May 1989) pp. 388-400. |
Warunek et.al., Clinical Use of Silicone Elastomer Applicances, JCO (1989) XXIII(10):694-700. |
Wells, Application of the Positioner Appliance in Orthodontic Treatment, Am. J. Orthodont. (1970) 58:351-366. |
Williams, “Dentistry and CAD/CAM: Another French Revolution,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 2-5 (Jan./Mar. 1987). |
Williams, “The Switzerland and Minnesota Developments in CAD/CAM,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 50-55 (Apr./Jun. 1987). |
Wishan, “New Advances in Personal Computer Applications for Cephalometric Analysis, Growth Prediction, Surgical Treatment Planning and Imaging Processing,” Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxilofacial Surgery Presented on Sep. 13, 1990. |
WSCG'98—Conference Program, “The Sixth International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization '98,” Feb. 9-13, 1998, pp. 1-7, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL(http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/wscg98.h). |
Xia et al., “Three-Dimensional Virtual-Reality Surgical Planning and Soft-Tissue Prediction for Orthognathic Surgery,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 5(2):97-107 (Jun. 2001). |
Yamamoto et al., “Optical Measurement of Dental Cast Profile and Application to Analysis of Three-Dimensional Tooth Movement in Orthodontics,” Front. Med. Biol. Eng., 1(2):119-130 (1988). |
Yamamoto et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurement of Dental Cast Profiles and Its Applications to Orthodontics,” Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 12(5):2051-2053 (1990). |
Yamany et al., “A System for Human Jaw Modeling Using Intra-Oral Images,” Proc. of the 20th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Nov. 1, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 563-566. |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); I. The D.P. Concept and Implementation of Transparent Silicone Resin (Orthocon),” Nippon Dental Review, 452:61-74 (Jun. 1980). |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); II. The D.P. Manufacturing Procedure and Clinical Applications,” Nippon Dental Review, 454:107-130 (Aug. 1980). |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III. The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 1, Dental and Functional Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 457:146-164 (Nov. 1980). |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III.—The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 2. Skeletal Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 458:112-129 (Dec. 1980). |
You May be a Candidate for This Invisible No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages (2002). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200100867 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15907106 | Feb 2018 | US |
Child | 16697072 | US | |
Parent | 15369145 | Dec 2016 | US |
Child | 15907106 | US | |
Parent | 14641926 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15369145 | US | |
Parent | 13241090 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 14641926 | US | |
Parent | 11933350 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 13241090 | US | |
Parent | 11013154 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 11933350 | US |