This invention relates to the prevention of microbial growth in metalworking fluids in a machine, wherein lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluids can contaminate the metalworking fluid and to machine-tool lubricants, hydraulic or tapping fluids and the like incorporating anti-microbial agents, and specifically relates to a method of introducing antimicrobial agents into metalworking fluids.
In many mechanical environments, there will be present both oil based and water based compounds. Many machines use hydraulic power incorporating a high pressure hydraulic fluid, an oil, in a sealed environment. However, seals age and leakage of hydraulic fluid can occur to contaminate metalworking fluid.
Mechanical processes often need a lubricating compound to prevent friction between moving parts. An example of such a system is industrial metal-working machine tools wherein the work piece and tooling are positioned and moved on flat bearings generally referred to as slideways. These surfaces require a lubricant—the slideway lubricant—to reduce the metal/metal contact therefore eliminating friction and ‘stick-slip’ motion, and prevent wear on the slideways. This is essential to maintain the potentially very expensive machine tool in good condition and to ensure machining accuracy. As most machining processes also utilise a flood applied, water-oil emulsion based metalworking fluid to cool and lubricate the working zone the slideway lubricant is constantly washed off the surfaces of the slides. To combat this most machine tools automatically dispense oil onto the slides on a continuous or metered basis. Given the very low cost of the slideway lubricant this total loss system is the most cost effective method of ensuring that the performance of the machine is not compromised. The lost lubricant, tramp oil, is washed with the metalworking fluid into a sump, from which the metalworking fluid is recycled.
Whilst such methods ensure that the machine stays in good condition it has the opposite effect on the metalworking fluids. Being oil-water emulsions, metalworking fluids provide an ideal environment for microbial growth. Although great efforts are made when formulating metalworking fluids to exclude obvious sources of nutrients and to ensure that the fluids are as resistant as possible to microbial growth this is largely negated if contaminated by the slideway lubricant. Since slideway lubricants are generally based on refined mineral oils and contain elements such as sulphur and phosphorus (as anti-wear and anti-corrosion agents), these provide ideal nutrients for micro-organisms. It is accepted throughout the metalworking industry that one of the main causes of failure for metalworking fluids is microbial growth promoted by excessive contamination with slideway lubricants. In systems with low agitation the slideway oil can separate from the emulsion, sealing it from the air. In such anaerobic conditions microbial growth in fluids produces by-products of respiration, such as Hydrogen Sulphide which causes an unpleasant odour and makes the system unpleasant to work with.
Hand applied tapping fluids, may be used for tapping, reaming and drilling operations, and when used on machine tools with water mix, flood applied cutting fluids can also contaminate the cutting fluid.
Several attempts have been made to overcome this problem, which include:
The most effective way to prevent microbial growth in metalworking fluids has been the administration of an anti-microbial compound to the fluid. The addition of anti-microbials to fluids has been common place in both household and industrial environments.
However, addition of anti microbial compositions into metalworking fluids can be problematic, most of the compositions used are toxic and comprise dangerous chemicals. The quantities of anti microbial compounds used in metalworking fluids must be carefully monitored so that firstly, the concentration of compound is high enough to have a sufficient anti microbial effect and secondly, that the concentration is not at a level high enough to cause damage to people working in the vicinity of machinery treated with it.
It is an object of the invention to overcome the above-stated problem by introducing an anti-microbial agent to a metalworking fluid in a novel, safe and economic manner.
According to the present invention a method of preventing microbial growth in an oil-water emulsion metalworking fluid in a machine wherein lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluid can contaminate the metalworking fluid, comprises adding an oil-water partitionable anti-microbial agent to the lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluid whereby an effective quantity of the anti-microbial compound can partition into the metalworking fluid to reduce micro-organism activity. The lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluid is used as a vehicle to deliver the anti-microbial agent into the metalworking fluid in a safe and effective manner. The agent can either be incorporated into the lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluid or added to the lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluid.
Also according to the present invention, a lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluid composition for use in a machine, where an oil-water emulsion metalworking fluid is present, comprises a mineral oil base and an oil-water partitionable anti-microbial agent which will partition into the metalworking fluid and prevent micro-organism growth in the metalworking fluid particularly if the lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluid seals the metalworking fluid to produce an anaerobic environment.
Further according to the method of the present invention, and wherein:
The machine tool may have a reservoir for lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluid and the anti-microbial agent may be added to the lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluid in the reservoir; or the anti-microbial agent may be incorporated as a composition with the lubricating oil or hydraulic or tapping fluid prior to use in the machine.
The machine tool may have a slideway and the lubricating oil may be a slideway lubricant.
An anti-microbial agent is herein defined “as any ingredient imparting microbial inhibiting properties”.
Slideway lubricants are specialised products normally containing, in the lubricant base, agents for anti-wear, tackiness (to control excessive washout) and demulsification (to limit harmful effects of emulsifying the slideway lubricant into the cutting fluid).
The present invention thus uses a slideway lubricant that incorporates an anti-microbial agent which, when the lubricant is washed into a metalworking fluid, tramp oil, will transfer into the aqueous phase where it will maintain anti-microbial properties in the fluid. All of the primary functions of the slideway lubricant (lubrication, anti-wear, etc) are unaffected by the inclusion of the agent and no specialist equipment is required, the lubricant is used in the existing lubrication system on each machine.
This method of adding to the microbial resistance of the fluid is also ‘intelligent’ in that the more tramp oil collected in the cutting fluid sump, the more anti-microbial agent will be transferred into the fluid maximising its resistance. In cleaner systems where less tramp oil collects there is less requirement for high levels of extra anti-microbial agent.
The anti-microbial agent for inclusion in the hydraulic or tapping fluid or slideway lubricant can be any of the commercially available microbicides which has a good degree of solubility in both oil based and water based system that would be familiar to anyone in either the metalworking or biocide industries. Examples include formaldehyde releasing compounds such as triazine derivatives and oxazolidines, or non-formaldehyde products such as benzisothiazolinones and parachloro metacresol.
Factors in choosing the anti-microbial agent are:
Following these criteria, the preferred anti-microbial compound for the invention is 7a-ethyldihydro-1H,3H,5H-oxazolo(3,4-c)oxazole. This is commercially available from Angus Chemie under their trade name Bioban CS-1246. The properties of articular interest for this agent are:
Enterobacter aerogenes
Escherischia coli
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Staphylococcus aureus
Aspergillus niger
Fusarium moniliforme
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
The experimental details referred to above are:
Four samples consisting of a mineral oil base, a commercially available slideway lubricant agent package (containing agent agents for anti-wear, corrosion inhibition etc), a tackiness agent (to promote adhesion of the slideway lubricant to metal surfaces) and anti-bacterial agent (Bioban CS1246) were prepared as follows.
[Note: All compositions are % weight/weight.]
1paraffinic mineral oil with a kinematic viscosity of approximately 100 cSt at 40° C.
2paraffinic mineral oil with a kinematic viscosity of approximately 30 cSt at 40° C.
3slideway lubricant agent package commercially available from Ethyl Petroleum Agents Ltd.
4polyisobutylene tackifier commercially available from Ethyl Petroleum Agents Ltd.
These samples were then subjected to an anti-bacterial screening test against Pseudomonas aeruginosa—one of the most common spoilage organisms found in cutting fluids.
The oil samples were placed in a 10 mm diameter “well” in the centre of an inoculated agar plate. The plates were then incubated for 48 hours and visually inspected. Any anti-bacterial activity of the samples is shown as a zone of inhibition—zero bacterial growth—around the original 10 mm diameter well, the diameter of which can be measured to give a semi-quantitative estimate of activity.
[Note: To obtain the measure of anti-bacterial activity the original diameter of the “well” must be subtracted (10 mm is therefore zero inhibition).]
From these results it is evident that the most cost effective balance between biocide level and activity was reached with sample C.
One of the key criteria in selecting an anti-microbial is to ensure compatibility with the slideway lubricant. Two of the key measures of this are the anti-wear and demulsification properties of the oil. Sample A (untreated slideway lubricant) and Sample C were tested using industry standard test methods as follows:
Demulsification test (40 mls of oil and 40 mls of water are mixed together in 100 ml measuring cylinder. At 5 minute intervals the volume of water separated from the oil/water mix is recorded).
Although the rate of separation of water is slowed by the inclusion of the anti-microbial, demulsification does still occur. In practice the slightly slower rate of separation should provide a longer time scale for the transfer of the anti-microbial into the cutting fluid.
The shell 4 ball wear test was carried out to determine the two lubricants ability to prevent wear.
Shell 4-ball ear test (60 kg load run for 15 minutes) Sample A
Sample C
It can be seen that anti-wear properties are improved by the inclusion of an anti-microbial agent, despite the overall composition containing less paraffinic mineral oil. The improvement is unexpected and, while not fully explained, may be due to catalysation of chemical reaction between the sulphur and phosphorus anti-wear agent agents present in the oil and the steel surface.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0128502.2 | Nov 2001 | GB | national |
0215454.0 | Jul 2002 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB02/05321 | 11/26/2002 | WO | 00 | 11/5/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/048283 | 6/12/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3517022 | Miller et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3915970 | Limaye et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4159253 | Grier et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4277353 | Deen et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4414121 | Aiello | Nov 1983 | A |
4425248 | Piotrowski et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4666616 | Rossmoore | May 1987 | A |
4707282 | Rossmoore | Nov 1987 | A |
4787995 | Nichols et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4946612 | Kanamori et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4968323 | Blackburn et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5162354 | Fernando Del Corral et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5508417 | Osei-Gyimah et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5534624 | Lesmann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5716917 | Williams et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5798322 | Brannen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6310013 | Lokkesmoe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6861395 | Eastwood et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7320758 | Messier et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
35 08 946 | Sep 1986 | DE |
1 505 069 | Mar 1978 | GB |
2230190 | Oct 1990 | GB |
WO 9965315 | Dec 1999 | WO |
01 30946 | May 2001 | WO |
01 92444 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050059559 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |