The present invention relates to the field of pricking systems.
Pricking systems are used, for example, by diabetics who have to check their blood-sugar level several times a day and who need for that purpose a sample of body liquid, as a rule of blood or interstitial liquid that is gained from a prick wound produced by a pricking system.
Especially high user comfort is offered by pricking systems where one and the same appliance is used for producing a prick wound and for collecting a sample from a prick wound so produced. Automatic sampling makes it easier for a user to analyze a sample of body liquid, which is a considerable advantage especially for persons whose manual mobility is impaired by age or illness. In addition, automatic sampling reduces the risk of contamination of samples, which otherwise might lead to distortion of the measuring results.
However, automatic sampling provides the risk that too small a portion of the body liquid issuing from the prick wound, insufficient to guarantee reliable testing, may be collected. In the worst of all cases this may lead to the result that following an unsuccessful sampling test a user has to undergo a second pricking operation. In order to reduce the risk of unsuccessful pricking, i.e. that an insufficient quantity of sampling liquid is collected, it normally is possible to increase the pricking depth so that a greater quantity of body liquid will issue from the prick wound. While in this way the probability of a sufficient quantity of body liquid being withdrawn from the prick wound can be increased, a greater pricking depth causes greater pain.
Now, it is an object of the present invention to show how the collection of samples can be improved for a pricking system.
That object is achieved by a pricking system having the features defined in claim 1. Advantageous further developments are the subject matter of the dependent claims.
It is against the above background that the present invention provides certain unobvious advantages and advancements over the prior art. In particular, the inventors have recognized a need for improvements in pricking systems. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a drive of the pricking system is coupled, via a coupling element, with a lancet for a pricking movement and with a sampling device for a sampling movement. Accordingly, the coupling part is moved during each pricking movement and each sampling movement, respectively, from a starting position to an end position by an advancing movement, and then back from the end position to the starting position by a reversing movement.
Although the sampling device should be guided for a sampling operation as precisely as possible to the prick wound that has been produced before by a pricking movement, it has been found as part of the invention that identical movements of the coupling part in a sampling movement and a pricking movement are neither necessary nor advantageous. Surprisingly, efficient sampling can be achieved when the end position reached by the coupling part in a sampling movement differs from the end position reached by the coupling part in a pricking movement.
This can be achieved by having the coupling part perform a longer travel in a sampling movement than in a pricking movement. It is possible in this way to adjust the travel of a pricking movement to the particular pricking depth that meets the requirements of a user and to neverthe less guarantee at any time reliable sampling.
Alternatively or additionally, there is the possibility, with a view to improving the efficiency of the sampling operation, to laterally offset the end position reached by the coupling part in a sampling movement, also and especially relative to an end position that is reached by the coupling part in, a pricking movement.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the invention taken together with the accompanying claims. It is noted that the scope of the claims is defined by the recitations therein and not by the specific discussion of features and advantages set forth in the present description.
The following detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawing. In the drawing, identical and corresponding components are indicated by the same reference numerals, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help improve understanding of the embodiments of the present invention.
For the purposes of describing and defining the present invention it is noted that terms like “preferably”, “commonly”, and “typically” are not utilized herein to limit the scope of the claimed invention or to imply that certain features are critical, essential, or even important to the structure or function of the claimed invention. Rather, these terms are merely intended to highlight alternative or additional features that may or may not be utilized in a particular embodiment of the present invention.
In the illustrated embodiment, the pricking system 1 comprises a multiple-use pricking device into which an exchangeable supply of lancets and test elements can be loaded. For this purpose, the pricking device is equipped with a receptacle (not shown) for an exchangeable supply of lancets and test elements. The receptacle has an opening that can be closed, arranged on the back of the embodiment illustrated in
The supply of lancets and test elements of the illustrated embodiment consists in a carrier tape which carries a plurality of lancets between which test elements are arranged for examination of a sample of a body liquid. The test elements contain for example test chemicals which, when brought into contact with an analyte to be detected, for example glucose, produce a change in color that can be recorded photometrically. Electrochemical sample testing, for example, is likewise possible.
The carrier tape is moved by a transport facility in a feed direction so that the lancets and test elements can be sequentially moved to the correct position for use. The transport facility may comprise, for example, a winding device on which the carrier strip is wound up in a manner similar to a tape of a tape cassette. Instead of using a carrier tape as a supply of lancets and test elements, other kinds of lancet and/or test element supplies, such as rotary magazines, may be used as well.
The term “transport direction” as used herein is understood to describe the longitudinal direction of the carrier tape along which the carrier tape must be transported to move unused lancets to the pricking position, and to remove used lancets from the pricking position.
At the moment of a pricking movement, the coupling part 11 is moved in a pricking direction, which is indicated in
The term “bending in lengthwise direction” as used in this connection is meant to describe that the carrier tape is bent about a geometric bending axis that extends in lengthwise direction of the strip. Bending of the carrier tape in lengthwise direction, accordingly, has the effect that the two longitudinal edges of the carrier tape come to include between them an angle different from 180°, for example an angle of between 90° and 135°.
The pricking movement comprises an advancing movement by which the coupling part 11 is moved from the starting position illustrated in
Body liquid 8 issuing from a prick wound produced is illustrated diagrammatically as drops in
During collection of a sample, the carrier tape 10 is bent in its lengthwise direction, just as it was during the pricking operation. The sampling movement is illustrated in
If the coupling part 11 were to reach the same end position by the sampling movement as by a pricking movement, i.e. the end position illustrated in
The lateral offset of the coupling part 11 preferably amounts to more than 1 mm so that positioning inaccuracies of the sampling device 9 or movements of the body part 5 are of no significance, if possible. In principle, improved sample collection may, however, also be achieved with a lateral offset, i.e. transversely to the pricking direction, of less than 1 mm.
The coupling part 11 comprises a cam rider 24 that moves along the deeper groove 23 during a pricking movement, as illustrated in
In that embodiment, the travel of the coupling part 11 is greater in a sampling movement than in a pricking movement, the groove 22 of lesser depth extending above the groove 23 in the pricking direction. This is of advantage because the travel during a pricking movement may depend on the pricking depth that may be adjusted, for example, by varying the spacing between the housing opening 2 and the drive 21. Generally, it can be said that the travel of a pricking movement gets smaller as the adjusted pricking depth decreases. However, the position of the skin surface, from which a sample of a body liquid 8 is to be picked up by the sampling movement, relative to the housing opening 2 does not depend on the pricking depth. By making the travel of the coupling part 11 greater for a sampling movement than for a pricking movement, reliable sample collection can be ensured also for different pricking depths.
In the illustrated embodiment, it is the sense of rotation of the rotor 1 which determines which of the two cams 22, 23 is engaged by the cam 24. The sense of rotation of the rotor 21 is indicated by arrows in
A diagrammatic representation of a pricking system with a motion control 20 is illustrated in
In the case of the illustrated pricking system the coupling part 11 is driven via a rotor 21 with which the coupling part is connected via a connecting rod 33. The rotor 21 is connected with a mechanical energy storage mechanism, for example a spiral spring, which provides the required motive force when a pricking or a sampling movement is initiated.
When a pricking movement is initiated, the cam rider 24 moves linearly in the direction indicated by the arrow in
In
Corresponding to
In the embodiment illustrated in
The stop element 20 has a bottom surface 40, facing the housing opening 2, and an upper surface with a stop surface 41, extending obliquely to the bottom surface 40, against which the coupling part 11 comes to abut when performing a pricking operation. The stop element 20 has an extension in the pricking direction, from the stop surface 41 to the bottom surface 40, that varies transversely to the pricking direction with the result that the length by which the tip of the lancet 7 will project beyond the bottom surface 40 of the stop element during the pricking operation can be adjusted by moving the stop element 20 transversely to the pricking direction. The stop element 20 is coupled, via an extension 42, with an adjusting means by which it can be displaced transversely to the pricking direction, in the transport direction of the carrier tape 10, for adjusting the pricking depth.
As can be seen in
As can be seen especially in
The drive of the embodiment illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, the deflection plane 44 preferably extends over a length at least equal to the length of the coupling part 11 in the transport direction. The stop element 20 cooperates with an abutment (not shown) that absorbs the force exerted by a coupling part 11 as it slides along the deflected plane 44, and thus stabilizes the deflection part against displacement transversely to the pricking direction. The abutment additionally may serve to urge the bottom surface of the stop element 20 against the body part 5 in which a prick wound is to be produced.
Just as the motion control of the embodiments described before, the motion control constituted by the stop element 20 and the deflection plane 44 connected with it has the result to laterally displace the end position of the coupling part 11 during a sampling movement relative to the end position of the coupling part 11 during a pricking movement by approximately 10-40% of the width of the carrier tape 11, preferably 15-35%, especially 20-30% of the width of the carrier tape 10. In the embodiment illustrated in
During a pricking movement the coupling part 11 is moved in the pricking direction by rotation of the rotor 21 until in its end position illustrated in
For collecting a sample, the stop element 20 is moved out of the path of the coupling part 11, transversely to the pricking direction, so that the coupling part 11 is free during a sampling movement to move over the full travel of the cam arranged on the lateral surface of the rotor 21.
The stop element 20 may be additionally provided with an inclined surface 44, as illustrated in
List Of Reference Numerals
Having described the invention in detail and by reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the invention defined in the appended claims. More specifically, although some aspects of the present invention are identified herein as preferred or particularly advantageous, it is contemplated that the present invention is not necessarily limited to these preferred aspects of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07009744 | May 2007 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2008/003242, filed Apr. 23, 2008, which claims priority to European Application No. 07009744.9, filed. May 16, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4416279 | Lindner et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4442836 | Meinecke et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
5508171 | Walling et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5554166 | Lange et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5846837 | Thym et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6036919 | Thym et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6322575 | Schraga | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6472220 | Simons et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7008799 | Zimmer et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7025774 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7223248 | Erickson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238192 | List et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7344507 | Briggs et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7377904 | Conway et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7479119 | Roe | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481777 | Chan et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7654969 | Wong et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7862519 | Ward et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
8540647 | Konya | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20020052618 | Haar et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020188224 | Roe et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030050573 | Kuhr et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050655 | Roe | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083686 | Freeman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030211619 | Olson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216767 | List et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040138688 | Giraud | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040225312 | Orloff et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254599 | Lipoma et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015020 | LeVaughn et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023448 | Ogawara et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050177183 | Thorne et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050201897 | Zimmer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232815 | Ruhl et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245845 | Roe et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245954 | Roe et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060002816 | Zimmer et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060052724 | Roe | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060100542 | Wong et al. | May 2006 | A9 |
20060173380 | Hoenes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060216817 | Hoenes et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229533 | Hoenes et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247554 | Roe | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247555 | Harttig | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070004990 | Kistner et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038150 | Calasso et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070173740 | Chan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179406 | DeNuzzio et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219572 | Deck et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080103415 | Roe et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161725 | Wong et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090321287 | List et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100210970 | Horikawa et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222703 | Takashima et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120226195 | Chan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2311496 | Jun 1999 | CA |
19705091 | Feb 1999 | DE |
10332488 | Feb 2005 | DE |
10343896 | Apr 2005 | DE |
1424040 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1402812 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1714613 | Oct 2006 | EP |
20060023591 | Mar 2006 | KR |
9702487 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9848695 | Nov 1998 | WO |
2004056269 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004060143 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005020197 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005107596 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006013045 | Feb 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English Translation of corresponding PCT/EP2008/003242 Written Opinion. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100094325 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2008/003242 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 12619420 | US |