The present invention relates to a radio communication system and further relates to primary and secondary stations for use in such a system and to a method of operating such a system. While the present specification is describes a system with particular reference to the Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS), it is to be understood that such techniques are equally applicable to use in other mobile radio systems.
In a radio communication system, radio signals typically travel from a transmitter to a receiver via a plurality of paths, each involving reflections from one or more scatterers. Received signals from the paths may interfere constructively or destructively at the receiver (resulting in position-dependent fading). Further, differing lengths of the paths, and hence the time taken for a signal to travel from the transmitter to the receiver, may cause inter-symbol interference.
It is well known that the above problems caused by multipath propagation can be mitigated by the use of multiple antennas at the receiver (receive diversity), which enables some or all of the multiple paths to be resolved. For effective diversity it is necessary that signals received by individual antennas have a low cross-correlation. Typically this is ensured by separating the antennas by a substantial fraction of a wavelength, although closely-spaced antennas may also be employed by using techniques disclosed in our International patent application WO01/71843 (applicant's reference PHGB000033). By ensuring use of substantially uncorrelated signals, the probability that destructive interference will occur at more than one of the antennas at any given time is minimised.
Similar improvements may also be achieved by the use of multiple antennas at the transmitter (transmit diversity). Diversity techniques may be generalised to the use of multiple antennas at both transmitter and receiver, known as a Multi-Input Multi-Output (MIMO) system, which can further increase system gain over a one-sided diversity arrangement. As a further development, the presence of multiple antennas enables spatial multiplexing, whereby a data stream for transmission is split into a plurality of sub-streams, each of which is sent via many different paths. One example of such a system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,067,290, another example, known as the BLAST system, is described in the paper “V-BLAST: an architecture for realising very high data rates over the rich-scattering wireless channel” by P W Wolniansky et al in the published papers of the 1998 URSI International Symposium on Signals, Systems and Electronics, Pisa, Italy, 29 Sep. to 2 Oct. 1998.
The performance gains which may be achieved from a MIMO system may be used to increase the total data rate at a given error rate, or to reduce the error rate for a given data rate, or some combination of the two. A MIMO system can also be controlled to reduce the total transmitted energy or power for a given data rate and error rate.
One area in which MIMO techniques may be applied is a High-Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) scheme, which is currently being developed for UMTS and which may facilitate transfer of packet data to a mobile station at up to 4 Mbps. In one proposed embodiment of HSDPA separate data streams are sent from respective antennas at a Base Station (BS), which data streams can in principle be received and decoded by a Mobile Station (MS) having at least as many antennas as there are data streams. An ARQ (Automatic Repeat reQuest) scheme is needed to ensure correct delivery of each data packet, since accurate data transmission is viewed as more important than the reduced system throughput under poor channel conditions (due to multiple re-transmissions).
A problem with the use of a MIMO system for packet data transmission is the impact of differing radio link qualities on the communication system. For example, some of the data streams may have very poor quality radio links, and if all the data is combined this will degrade the performance of the other links.
An object of the present invention is to provide a MIMO system having to improved performance.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a radio communication system having a communication channel comprising a plurality of paths between a primary station having a plurality of antennas and a secondary station having at least one antenna, wherein the primary station is has means for transmitting substantially simultaneously a plurality of data packets to the secondary station, each packet being transmitted via a different subset of the plurality of paths, and the secondary station has means for receiving the plurality of data packets, for determining whether each packet is received correctly and for signalling this determination to the primary station for each of the plurality of packets.
By transmitting a plurality of packets in parallel, each via a subset of the available paths in the communication channel, improved performance is enabled compared with known systems in which each packet is transmitted via the same set of paths. This is because the effect of one of the paths providing a poor quality radio link is restricted to a subset of the transmitted packets.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a primary station having a plurality of antennas for use in a radio communication system having a communication channel comprising a plurality of paths between the primary station and a secondary station having at least one antenna, wherein means are provided for transmitting substantially simultaneously a plurality of data packets to the secondary station, each packet being transmitted via a different subset of the plurality of paths, and for receiving from the secondary station a determination of whether each packet is received correctly.
In one embodiment of the present invention each data packet is restricted to a subset of the available paths by mapping it to one of the primary station's antennas. In another embodiment, beamforming techniques are used to transmit each data packet in a particular direction. Data packets transmitted via one subset of paths may have different transmission parameters, for example modulation and/or coding schemes and power levels. Closed loop power control may be applied independently to each subset of paths.
According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a secondary station having at least one antenna for use in a radio communication system having a communication channel comprising a plurality of paths between a primary station having a plurality of antennas and the secondary station, wherein means are provided for receiving a plurality of data is packets transmitted substantially simultaneously by the primary station, each packet being transmitted via a different subset of the plurality of paths, for determining whether each packet is received correctly and for signalling this determination to the primary station for each of the plurality of packets.
The secondary station may signal its determination of whether each packet is received correctly via a subset of the available uplink paths to the primary station, or in any other suitable manner.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of operating a radio communication system having a communication channel comprising a plurality of paths between a primary station having a plurality of antennas and a secondary station having at least one antenna, wherein the primary station transmits substantially simultaneously a plurality of data packets to the secondary station, each packet being transmitted via a different subset of the plurality of paths, and the secondary station receives the plurality of data packets, determines whether each packet is received correctly and signals this determination to the primary station for each of the plurality of packets.
The present invention is based upon the recognition, not present in the prior art, that improved performance in a MIMO system used for packet data transfer can be obtained by transmitting data packets in parallel by different subsets of the available paths.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In the drawings the same reference numerals have been used to indicate corresponding features.
Suitable coding, typically including Forward Error Correction (FEC), may be applied by the BS 100 before multiplexing. This is known as vertical coding, and has the advantage that coding is applied across all sub-streams. However, problems may arise in extracting the sub-streams since joint decoding is needed and it is difficult to extract each sub-stream individually. As an alternative each sub-stream may be coded separately, a technique known as horizontal coding which may simplify receiver operation. These techniques are discussed for example in the paper “Effects of Iterative Detection and Decoding on the Performance of BLAST” by X Li et al in the Proceedings of is the IEEE Globecom 2000 Conference, San Francisco, Nov. 27 to Dec. 1, 2000.
If vertical coding is used the FEC which is applied must have sufficient error-correcting ability to cope with the entire MIMO channel, which comprises a plurality of paths. It will be appreciated that the set of paths between BS 100 and MS 110 will typically include direct paths and indirect paths, the latter being where signals are reflected by one or more scatterers.
The MS 110 comprises a plurality of antennas 118 (labelled A, B, C and D in
In the simplest implementation of a BS 100, each data sub-stream is mapped to a separate antenna 108. Such an implementation is appropriate for spatially uncorrelated radio channels. In the general case, for which a suitable BS 100 is illustrated in
For simplicity, the following embodiments use the simplest case of a one-to-one mapping between data sub-streams and antennas 108, but it will be appreciated that the present invention is not limited to such a scenario.
In a packet data transmission system, ARQ can be used to correct any erroneous packets. An example of an ARQ scheme operating in known manner is illustrated in
Other techniques may be used instead of simple retransmission of a data packet 302 in response to a negative acknowledgement 306. An example of such a technique is ARQ using incremental redundancy, where retransmissions relating to a packet are not identical to the originally-transmitted packet but include additional redundant information. Data throughput may be increased by use of other techniques, one example of which is n-channel stop-and-wait ARQ. This scheme takes advantage of the significant time gaps in the basic scheme shown in
A simple embodiment of a MIMO packet data transmission scheme operating in accordance with the present invention is shown in
The MS 110 only receives packet P1 correctly, and hence transmits an acknowledgement (A1) 304 and a negative acknowledgement (N2) 306 as part of respective uplink data sub-streams UL1 and UL2 transmitted from respective antennas 118. The positive and negative acknowledgements A1 and N2 are transmitted substantially simultaneously using the same channelisation and scrambling codes. In response, the BS 100 transmits the next packet P3 via sub-stream DL1 and re-transmits packet P2 via sub-stream DL2. This time the MS 110 only receives packet P2 correctly, and therefore issues negative and positive acknowledgements, N3 and A2, via respective uplink sub-streams UL1 and UL2. As a result the BS 100 re-transmits packet P3 via sub-stream DL1 and transmits the next packet P4 via sub-stream DL2.
In the general case, almost any mechanism could be used for transmission of the acknowledgements 304,306, including time multiplexing on a single chanel, or simultaneous transmission via different channels. The uplink transmission method and radio channel may also be different from that used on the downlink. The most important requirement is that an acknowledgement is received by the BS 100 in time for it to determine whether to send a re-transmission or a new packet 302.
The BS 100 and/or MS 110 may make use of packets 302 received incorrectly to identify bad radio channels (i.e. bad antennas 108 or bad antenna beams), to enable performance to be optimised by avoiding such antennas or beams.
A variation on this embodiment is shown in
Since the radio link quality might be different for each sub-stream, data for respective sub-streams could be derived from different data sources with different quality requirements. The level of FEC applied to each sub-stream could optionally be varied depending on the quality of the radio link, as disclosed in our co-pending unpublished International patent application PCT/EP01/13690 (Applicant's reference PHGB 000168). Further, different choices of Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) could be made for different sub-streams, and the sub-streams could be transmitted at different power levels in response to different channel conditions.
In a further variation on the above embodiments, separate closed loop power control may be applied to the transmissions from each antenna 108 (e.g. using dedicated channels). Such a scheme could help with selection of an optimum antenna 108, as well as selection of a suitable MCS, as disclosed in our co-pending unpublished International patent application PCT/IB01/02555 (Applicant's reference PHGB010022).
In another embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in
Using MIMO, in a scenario such as that shown in
In order to obtain good performance in scheduling the use of downlink resources (channelisation codes and power) it is desirable that the downlink channel quality is known at the BS 100 for each possible radio link. This could be signalled directly for each sub-stream or determined in some other way (for example by the use of closed loop power control or feedback signals for antenna diversity). It is also important that the number of antennas, or ability to process multiple data streams, at each MS 110 is known to the BS 100. This could be signalled as a part of a registration process, in which the MS 110 informs the BS 100 of its capabilities.
There are a range of possible alternatives for the scheduling at step 708, for example, packets could be sent by the BS 100 in the order received, or preference could be given to sending data over radio links with high SIR. In an embodiment employing beamforming, to direct antenna beams in particular directions, more detailed information on the channel is needed at the BS 100 (to allow the correct antenna weights 202 to be used). This information may need to be signalled from the MS 110. Signalling to a MS 110 may also be needed to indicate which antenna transmissions (or beams) contain data for it, and which should be rejected as unwanted interference.
The present invention can be applied to mobile radio (e.g. UMTS), cordless and WLAN systems. It is particularly suited to the HSDPA concept, but not limited to it. The description above relates to a UMTS Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) mode. The invention could also be applied to a Time Division Duplex (TDD) system. In this case the fact that the uplink and downlink channel use different time slots at the same frequency (i.e. reciprocal channel) could reduce the need for signalling of channel information.
The present invention is also particularly applicable to CDMA systems in which the BS 100 typically provides pilot information to facilitate channel estimation. In the case of CDMA the possibility is already known of sending multiple data streams with different spreading codes or the same spreading code offset in time. These techniques can be used in conjunction with the present invention, in which more than one data stream has the same spreading code.
In the above description, the term ‘Base Station’ or ‘Primary Station’ relates to an entity which may in practice be distributed between a variety of parts of the fixed infrastructure. In a UMTS system, for example the functions of a BS 100 are carried out in a “Node B”, which is the part of the fixed infrastructure directly interfacing with a MS 110, and at a higher level in the is Radio Network Controller (RNC). As well as their use in transmission of data packets from a BS 100 to a MS 110, the techniques described may also be used for packet transmission in the reverse direction. In this case, the roles of the BS 100 and MS 110 would be reversed in the description above, with the BS 100 adopting the role of a secondary station and the MS 110 the role of a primary station.
From reading the present disclosure, other modifications will be apparent to persons skilled in the art. Such modifications may involve other features which are already known in the design, manufacture and use of radio communication systems and component parts thereof, and which may be used instead of or in addition to features already described herein.
In the present specification and claims the word “a” or “an” preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. Further, the word “comprising” does not exclude the presence of other elements or steps than those listed.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0110125.2 | Apr 2001 | GB | national |
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/872,553 filed on Oct. 1, 2015, (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,635,599), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/128,636 filed Apr. 23, 2002 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,178,577), which claims priority to United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB0110125.2 filed Apr. 25, 2001, the contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4506385 | Fedde et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4825193 | Siwiak | Apr 1989 | A |
5121391 | Paneth et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5371734 | Fischer | Dec 1994 | A |
5487068 | Smolinske et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5603081 | Raith | Feb 1997 | A |
5699369 | Guha | Dec 1997 | A |
5828677 | Sayeed | Oct 1998 | A |
5974236 | Sherman | Oct 1999 | A |
6014374 | Paneth et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6067290 | Paulrj et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081296 | Fukunaga | Jun 2000 | A |
6088337 | Eastmond et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6144653 | Persson | Nov 2000 | A |
6144711 | Raleigh | Nov 2000 | A |
6151310 | Dent | Nov 2000 | A |
6192256 | Whinnett | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208663 | Schramm et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6282180 | Paneth et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289054 | Rhee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308294 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317466 | Foschini et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327310 | Hochwald et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334059 | Stilp et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6362781 | Thomas | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366570 | Bhagalia | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377631 | Raleigh | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380910 | Moustakas | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414945 | Chennakeshu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438389 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452981 | Raleigh | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473467 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493331 | Walton | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502063 | Eriksson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519731 | Huang | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535721 | Burke et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549585 | Naguib et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556173 | Moustakas | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567397 | Campana, Jr. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611515 | Balachandran | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615382 | Kang et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650869 | Kelly | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6662330 | Hershey | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678523 | Ghosh et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6728233 | Park et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731618 | Chung | May 2004 | B1 |
6751480 | Kogiantis et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6771706 | Ling et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6771905 | Bortz | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778501 | Malmgren | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778558 | Balachandran | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795407 | Chesson | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801790 | Rudrapatna | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816478 | Laroia | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823005 | Chuang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6859445 | Moon | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6930981 | Gopalakrishnan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934752 | Gubbi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6937592 | Heath et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6952454 | Jalali | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6999432 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999497 | Uesugi | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002923 | Golitschek et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006464 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7027418 | Gan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031371 | Lakkis | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7055107 | Rappaport | May 2006 | B1 |
7062295 | Yoshii et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068619 | Balachandran et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068628 | Li | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7113521 | Miller et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7133455 | Henning | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7339955 | Lakkis | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7342875 | Hammons | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7583614 | Golitschek et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590182 | Ling | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7643404 | Li | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7715469 | Chuang et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7949060 | Ling | May 2011 | B2 |
8019068 | Kogiantis | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8582485 | Fischer | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8634481 | Chung | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8755458 | Raleigh | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9426012 | Laroia | Aug 2016 | B2 |
10159071 | Park | Dec 2018 | B2 |
20010008542 | Wiebke et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010026546 | Schieder | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010033622 | Jongren et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010050964 | Foschini et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020054578 | Zhang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020080802 | Sachs et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020097686 | Qui | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116500 | Arora | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119778 | Baker et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127978 | Khatri | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141436 | Toskala | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154610 | Tiedemann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020193146 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20080130772 | Hammons | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0735701 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0736979 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0951091 | Oct 1999 | EP |
H04207421 | Jul 1992 | JP |
1155206 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2000101667 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000513918 | Oct 2000 | JP |
19990086133 | Dec 1999 | KR |
9900914 | Jan 1999 | WO |
200171843 | Sep 2001 | WO |
02045293 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02056499 | Jul 2002 | WO |
02061969 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02069664 | Sep 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nokia, “Double Data Rate for RDD Downlink Through Channel Code Puncturing in MIMO Channels”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1, TSGR1#19 R1-01-0258, 2001, pp. 1-4. |
Nokia, Text Proposal on HARQ Complexity to TR25.848, TSG-RAN Working Group 1 Meeting No. 18, TSGR1-01-0006, Jan. 15-18, pp. 1-5. |
Antipolis, “Transport Channel Multiplexing for HSDPA”, Lucent Technologies, 3GPP TSG RAN AWG1 & WG2 Meeting on HSDPA, 2001, pp. 1-4. |
“Physical Layer Aspects of Utra High Speed Downlink Packet Access”, 3GPP TR 25.848 V4.0.0, Mar. 2001, pp. 1-89. |
Li, “Effects of Iterative Detection and Decoding on the Performance of Blast”, Global Telecommunications Conference, vol. 2, 2000, pp. 1061-1066. |
Wolniansky et al, “V-Blast: An Architecture for Realizing Very High Data Rates Over the Rich-Scattering Wireless Channel”, Signals, Systems, and Electronics, Issue 98, 1998, pp. 295-300. |
MacDonald et al, U.S. Appl. No. 60/246,023, filed Nov. 6, 2000,. “Space-Time coded OFDM system for MMDS Applications”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170230278 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14872553 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15494975 | US | |
Parent | 10128636 | Apr 2002 | US |
Child | 14872553 | US |