In printing, print agent is applied to a substrate.
Non-limiting examples will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
During a printing operation, print agent may be transferred from a print agent applicator to a printing drum to form a latent print agent image on the drum exterior surface. The print agent may comprise an ink, toner, coating and the like. An intermediate member may then transfer the latent print agent image from the printing drum to a substrate to create a printed image. The substrate may in principle comprise any material, including paper, card, plastics, or fabric.
For example, a printing apparatus may comprise a liquid electrophotographic (LEP) printing apparatus where the print agent applicator may supply an electrostatic print agent. For example, the print agent applicator may be a binary ink developer (BID) to supply an electrostatic ink. The printing drum may comprise a photoconductive plate. For example, the photoconductive plate may be a photo imaging plate (PIP). A photoconductor charging unit may deposit a substantially uniform static charge on the exterior surface of the photoconductive plate. The exterior surface is then exposed to light by an image writing unit to selectively dissipate the static charge and form a latent electrostatic image. The electrostatic print agent is attracted or repelled, depending on the potential at the photoconductive plate, to the latent electrostatic image and a latent printing fluid image is formed on the exterior surface of the photoconductive plate.
In a printing apparatus, the print agent applicator may transfer print agent to the printing drum from a print agent source. The print agent applicator may include a print agent roller to present a uniform layer of print agent to the printing drum. To apply the print agent to the printing drum, the print agent applicator is arranged in engaging contact with the printing drum, whereby the print agent roller exterior surface forms an engaging (mating) contact with printing drum exterior surface. The engaging contact between the print agent applicator and the printing drum may be referred to as “nip contact”. The engaging force applied by the print agent applicator in nip contact with the printing drum may be referred to as the “nip force”.
At certain points, the print agent applicator may be disengaged from the printing drum to inhibit the application of the print agent. This may, for example, be to avoid print agent transfer to “non-printing” regions of the printing drum (i.e. those regions in which a latent image is not formed), and/or to avoid a “seam” region of the printing drum. In some examples, a printing apparatus may have a number of print agent applicators, each associated with a different print agent such as a different colour, coating agent or the like. A first print agent applicator may be disengaged from the printing drum to allow for a second print agent applicator to engage the printing drum.
In some examples, a print agent applicator may be caused to engage and/or disengage the printing drum under the control of a positioning device. A printing apparatus may comprise two, or more than two, spaced positioning devices, which may act on the print agent applicator to position it in relation to the printing drum.
When the actuator 20 is activated to apply the driving force, and the mount 10 and the supported print agent applicator 100 are subject to the driving force, the guide mechanism 30 guides the mount 10 and the supported print agent applicator 100 to move with translational motion along the predetermined path towards the printing drum 200 to an engaging position on the predetermined path whereby the print agent applicator 100 forms an engaging contact 300 with the printing drum 200, as shown by example in
The predetermined path of the guide mechanism may be a linear path, curved path or any other suitable shaped path. As the mount and supported print agent applicator translate along the predetermined path, there is no change in the orientation of the mount and supported print agent applicator relative to a stationary printing drum, or relative to a support to which the mount may be supported. In other words, the mount and supported print agent applicator do not rotate or pivot relative to the printing drum or support during translation, and so the orientation of the mount and the supported print agent applicator remains constant.
By moving the print agent applicator translationally along the predetermined path and maintaining the orientation (i.e. inhibiting rotation) of the print agent applicator during translation, the guide mechanism provides for an accurate radial mating contact between the print agent applicator and printing drum, whereby the print agent applicator forms an engaging contact with the printing drum in a radial direction to the printing drum. By forming an accurate radial mating contact, the transfer of print agent from the print agent applicator to the printing drum is thereby improved, for example, the risk of smearing of the print agent is reduced. Hence, the printing quality is enhanced.
In an example of a positioning device 1 shown in
In an example, the guide mechanism 30 may guide the mount 10 and the supported print agent applicator 100 to move along the predetermined path away from the printing drum 200 to a disengaging position on the predetermined path with respect to the printing drum 200 when the actuator 20 is deactivated and the mount 10 and supported print applicator 100 are subject to a gravitational force.
The positioning device may have an engagement mode to engage the print agent applicator and printing drum when the actuator is activated to apply a driving force, and a default disengagement mode to disengage the print agent applicator and printing drum when the actuator is deactivated. The positioning device may be biased, for example by the gravitational force, to disengage the print agent applicator from the printing drum so that the disengagement mode is a default mode of the positioning device. Due to the default nature of the disengagement mode, the positioning device improves operating safety by allowing the print agent applicator to disengage from the printing drum during a power supply failure or shut down. The positioning device has a simple and low-cost design, avoiding the need for a costly and complex back-up power supply.
In an example, the actuator 20 may be activated to apply a returning force to the mount 10 at the actuation point 50, whereby the returning force is in an opposite direction to the driving force. When the actuator 20 is activated to apply the returning force, the guide mechanism 30 may guide the mount 10 and supported print agent applicator 100 along the predetermined path away from the printing drum 200 to the disengaging position on the predetermined path.
Unlike other modes of movement (for example, pivoting movement of a print agent applicator about a pivot), translational movement may be effected by the guide mechanism so that a mechanical advantage of the mount (i.e. the ratio of the output force applied to the print agent applicator by the mount, to the input driving force applied to the mount by the actuator) may remain constant during the movement of the mount and print agent applicator along the predetermined path.
By utilizing a guide mechanism to permit translational movement and prevent non-translational movement, the mechanical advantage by which the driving force is transferred from the actuation point 50 to the load point 40 may be independent of the distance between the actuation point 50 and the load point 40, that is to say, independent of the relative positioning of the actuation point 50 and the load point 40 on the mount. While it will be appreciated that any particular positioning device as installed may have a specific actuation point 50 and load point 40 which are non-variable during operation, it may nevertheless be of use to provide for modification of the relative positioning of the actuation point 50 and the load point 40. For example, this may be useful if a type or position of an actuator, a mount or an applicator is to be varied. Further, this may be useful in providing for the efficient mechanical design of a series of positioning devices that may have different installation and load point or actuation point constraints, since the mechanical advantage can be relied upon to be the same from one positioning device to the other, irrespective of variations in the particular geometry.
The driving force transferred from the actuation point 50 to the load point 40 may be parallel and opposite to the load force of the print agent applicator at the load point 40. Hence, the relationship between the driving and load forces remains constant, and independent of the distance between the actuation point 50 and load point 40. The positioning device thereby avoids the need for a complex actuator to amplify the driving force. When the driving force and load force are parallel, opposite and on a common axis, the sum of the moments may be zero and no turning moment is exerted on the mount and the supported print agent applicator by the driving force and the load force. As a result, the guide mechanism is not required to compensate for any turning moments due to the driving and load forces and so the guiding effect of the guide mechanism remains constant and the control and positioning by the positioning device is improved.
In an example, the guide mechanism may comprise a linkage mechanism. The linkage mechanism may comprise two parallel links coupled to the mount and a support. Such a linkage mechanism may therefore serve as a parallelogram linkage (a particular implementation of a four-bar linkage). Within the established terminology of four-bar linkages, the support to which the parallel links are coupled may be considered a ground link, the parallel links may be considered as rockers (or cranks, when permitted to rotate through 360°), and the mount may be considered a floating link. In a parallelogram linkage with crank members of equal length, the angular orientation of the floating link relative to the ground link is constant. The pivoting action of the parallel links (cranks) defines the predetermined path along which the mount, and thereby the supported print agent applicator, travel with translational motion.
When the actuator 20 is activated to apply the driving force on the mount 10, the driving force acting on the mount 10, and the supported print agent applicator 100, causes the parallel links 32, 34 to rotate to the first orientation O1. The rotating parallel links 32, 34 move the mount 10 and the supported print agent applicator 100 to translate along the predetermined path towards the printing drum 200 to the engaging position on the predetermined path whereby the supported print agent applicator 100 forms an engaging contact 300 with the printing drum 200.
When the actuator 20 is deactivated and a gravitational force acts on the mount 10 and the supported print agent applicator 100, or when the actuator 20 is activated to apply a returning force on the mount at the actuation point 50, the gravitational force or returning force acting on the mount 10, and the supported print agent applicator 100, causes the parallel links 32, 34 to rotate to the second orientation O2. The rotating parallel links 32, 34 move the mount 10, and the supported print agent applicator 100, with a translational motion along the predetermined path away from the printing drum 200 to a disengaging position on the predetermined path, whereby the supported print agent applicator 100 is disengaged from the printing drum and separated from the printing drum by a predetermined distance d.
In other examples, a guide mechanism may comprise a linear actuator acting between the mount 10 and a support 60. The linear action of the actuator defines the predetermined path along which the mount 10, and the supported print agent applicator 100, can move with translational motion. By way of example,
When the actuator 20 is actuated, a driving force acts on the rider 36 to cause the rider 36 to slide along the track 38 to the first position P1. The mount 10, and supported print agent applicator 100, move in unison with the rider 36 so as to translate upwardly along the predefined path towards the printing drum 200 to an engaging position on the path whereby the supported print agent applicator 100 forms an engaging contact 300 with the printing drum 200.
When the actuator 20 is deactivated and a gravitational force acts on the mount 10 and the supported print agent applicator 100, or when the actuator 20 is activated to apply a returning force on the mount at the actuation point 50, the gravitational force or returning force acting on the mount 10, and the supported print agent applicator 100, causes the rider 36 to slide back along the track 38 to the second position P2. The mount 10 and supported print agent applicator 100 translate in unison with the rider 36 downwardly along the predefined path away from the printing drum (not shown). The print agent applicator 100 disengages from the printing drum and is arranged in spaced relationship from the printing drum by a predetermined distance d.
The mount of a positioning device may comprise a supporting connector to hold the print agent applicator at the load point on the mount. The connector may comprise any suitable releasable connecting mechanism. The connector may comprise a recess in which the print agent applicator may be releasably received. In an example of a mount 10 shown in
The mount may comprise a stabilising connector to hold the print agent applicator at a stabilising point on the mount, in addition to and separate from the connection at the load point. The stabilising connector may comprise a recess in which the print agent applicator can be releasably received and/or comprise a releasable coupling. The stabilising connector may be adjustable to prevent mechanical overconstrain of the print agent applicator. The stabilising connector inhibits relative rotational movement between the supported print agent applicator and the mount about the load point, and thereby improves the stability of the print agent applicator relative to the mount. As a result, a more accurate mating contact between the print agent applicator and printing drum can be achieved. In an example shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In an example, the feedback control module may comprise a position feedback control comprising a sensor to detect a position parameter relating to the position of the mount and the supported print agent applicator relative to a printing drum, and a controller to monitor the position parameter and to control the actuator to control the position of the mount and the supported print agent applicator relative to the printing drum in response to the detected position parameter.
The feedback control module may comprise a driving force feedback control comprising a sensor to detect a force parameter relating to the driving force of the actuator, and a controller to monitor the force parameter and to control the actuator to control the driving force acting on the mount and the supported print agent applicator relative to the printing drum in response to the detected force parameter.
The feedback control module may comprise an engaging force feedback control comprising a sensor to detect a force parameter relating to the engaging force between the supported print agent applicator and the printing drum when the supported print agent applicator and the printing drum are in engaging contact, and a controller to monitor the engaging force parameter and to control the actuator to control the engaging force
The first and second positioning device may be a positioning device as previously described with reference to
The system may comprise a feedback control module 500 to control the positioning devices. The feedback control module may comprise a sensor 510 to detect a position parameter relating to the position of the mount and the supported print agent applicator relative to a printing drum, and a controller 520 to monitor the position parameter and to control the respective actuators of the devices to control the position of the mount and the supported print agent applicator relative to the printing drum in response to the detected position parameter.
The sensor may be a sensor to detect a rotation or rotational orientation of the motor or the cam, whereby the rotation or rotational orientation of the motor or the cam relates to the position of the mount and the supported applicator.
The feedback control module may comprise a sensor to detect a force parameter relating to the driving force of the actuator, and a controller to monitor the force parameter and to control the respective actuators of the positioning devices to control the driving force acting on the mount and the supported print agent applicator relative to the printing drum in response to the detected force parameter.
The feedback control module may comprise a sensor to detect a force parameter relating to the engaging force between the supported print agent applicator and the printing drum when the supported print agent applicator and the printing drum are in engaging contact, and a controller to monitor the engaging force parameter and to control the respective actuators of the positioning devices to control the engaging force. The sensor and the controller may be separate from or the same as that described above for monitoring a force parameter relating to the driving force of the actuator.
The sensor may be a torque sensor to detect a torque acting on the motor of the respective actuators, whereby the torque is due to an engaging force between the applicator and printing drum in reaction to the driving force, and it is indicative that the applicator is positioned in engaging contact with the printing drum.
The sensor may be a load cell to detect a force parameter independent to the motor. The load cell is an element that when force (compression or tension) is applied on it, it generates electric parameter. In an example, when placing a load cell between the supported print agent applicator and the printing drum it will experience a compression load which is directly correlated to the engaging force and generate an electric parameter indicative of the engaging force.
The feedback control module may control the respective actuators of the positioning devices collectively or independently. The controller may control the respective actuators of the positioning devices so that the respective print agent applicators simultaneously or sequentially engage with the printing drum and/or simultaneously or sequentially disengage from the printing drum.
The feedback control module may control the actuators of the positioning devices to control the position of the first and second ends of the supported print agent applicator so as to target a uniform engaging contact along the length of the supported print agent applicator. The feedback control module may control the actuators of the positioning devices to control the position of the first and second ends of the supported print agent applicator so as to target a uniform disengagement along the length of the supported print agent applicator. The feedback control module may control the actuators to control the position of the first and second ends of the print agent applicator to correct for any differences/misalignments in the printing apparatus, for example based on the position parameter or a force parameter as described above.
The feedback control module may control the actuators of the respective positioning devices to control the driving force of the actuators to target a predetermined engaging force (for example, an engaging force within a predetermined range) or force profile between the supported print agent applicator and the printing drum. The predetermined engaging force profile may correspond to a uniform engaging force along the length of the supported print agent applicator, and it may be targeted based on targeting equivalence in the force parameters associated with each of the positioning devices. The predetermined engaging force may be of a magnitude to achieve a sufficient pressure for a smooth transfer of print agent from the print agent applicator and the printing drum.
Due to the direct driving arrangement of the actuator on the mount, intermediate components are avoided and mechanical noise from intermediate components is averted. Hence, the signal to noise ratio and monitoring to determine the driving force of the motor and/or position of the supported print agent applicator may be improved.
The positioning devices described herein provide for minimised actuation and interface tolerances between the actuator, mount and guide mechanism to enable improved sensing and control of the actuator (motor and/or cam), and thereby improved positioning of the supported print agent applicator relative to the printing drum and/or engaging force applied by the applicator on the printing drum.
An example method of positioning a print agent applicator with respect to a printing drum is shown in
The present disclosure is described with reference to flow charts and/or block diagrams of the method, devices and systems according to examples of the present disclosure. Although the flow diagrams described above show a specific order of execution, the order of execution may differ from that which is depicted. Blocks described in relation to one flow chart may be combined with those of another flow chart.
While the method, apparatus and related aspects have been described with reference to certain examples, various modifications, changes, omissions, and substitutions can be made without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure. It is intended, therefore, that the method, apparatus and related aspects be limited only by the scope of the following claims and their equivalents. It should be noted that the above-mentioned examples illustrate rather than limit what is described herein, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative implementations without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
The word “comprising” does not exclude the presence of elements other than those listed in a claim, “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality, and a single processor or other unit may fulfil the functions of several units recited in the claims.
The features of any dependent claim may be combined with the features of any of the independent claims or other dependent claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2019/067800 | 12/20/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/126236 | 6/24/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3942474 | Smith et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4896193 | Kagiura et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5239347 | Onodera | Aug 1993 | A |
6234603 | Altfather et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6282392 | Yamaguchi | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6711372 | Noda et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7177575 | Okabe | Feb 2007 | B2 |
8463148 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8818235 | Kishi | Aug 2014 | B2 |
11287761 | Itabashi | Mar 2022 | B2 |
20130071141 | Ueno et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20200310340 | Itabashi | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210080862 | Kusano | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210165341 | Tsukahara | Jun 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10333435 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2009047845 | Mar 2009 | JP |
4630656 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2014-112169 | Jun 2014 | JP |
2016143333 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220397843 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |