Referring now to the figures of the drawings in detail and first, particularly, to
A print control strip 3 is disposed in a free area of the original image. Such a print control strip is usually located at a front edge or rear edge of the original image in relation to the print substrate to be printed.
The print control strip 3 includes measurement fields 4, 4′, 5, 5′ as process control elements. For reasons of clarity, these measurement fields are enlarged and not drawn to scale. They may be solid tone fields, halftone fields, register fields, or the like.
The pages 1, 2 of the original image are assigned borders 6, 7 and 8, 9. The dashed lines are the continuation of these borders 6, 7, 8, 9 in the area of the print control strip 3.
According to the prior art, the print control strip is chopped during page assembly based on the borders 6, 7 and 8, 9. Such a chopping reduces the print control strip 3 and the process control elements 4′ and 5′ are chopped and remain only in part. In a subsequent measurement to evaluate the print result, these process control element parts 4′ and 5′ may cause errors or at least confusion in a measurement system.
For a better understanding, example 1 illustrates a program routine for preparing a print control strip according to the prior art in the form of a pseudocode.
That program routine is stored as a PostScript within an original image in the PostScript format.
It is a program loop that instructs for all process control elements of the print control strip, i.e. for all measurement fields of the strip to go to the position of the current measurement field, to draw the measurement field, and to prepare the next measurement field in a following execution of the loop.
In that manner, all measurement fields are initially drawn without considering a required chopping due to the used area. In the prior art, the RIP frequently knows where the used area is located, i.e. where the borders 6, 7, 8, 9 of the individual used areas are located. All image data that are outside those borders are not prepared. Thus the chopped fields described with reference to
A pseudocode of an exemplary simplified program routine for preparing a print control strip in accordance with a method of the invention is given in Example 2:
In this context, a loop is likewise to be executed. Initially, the first measurement field, i.e. a first process control element, is targeted. This measurement field is examined to find out whether parts of the process control element or measurement field are inside or outside the borders 6, 7 or 8, 9. Then the measurement field or process control element is assigned a state yes or no. Yes means that the process control element is outside the borders. No means that the process control element is inside the borders. Depending on the associated state, the process control element is drawn if its state is no and it is not drawn if the state is yes. This loop is executed for all process control elements of the print control strip 3.
This program routine may likewise be stored within a PostScript file of the original image. It may also be an embedded program function with in a PDF of an original image. In this case, the RIP opens the embedded program code and executes the process of preparing the print control strip. Suitable tolerances for assigning the states may be stored in a separate area of the program or may be provided directly in the RIP. Based on these tolerances, for the measurement fields 5′ assigned the state “no”, the measurement field is not located outside the borders 6, 7, 8, 9. A print control strip is generated that includes only complete process control elements 5, 5′ located substantially inside the orders 6, 7, 8, 9 of used areas of the original image. Confusion of the electronic measurement system due to chopped measurement fields is avoided.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
DE102006049028.2 | Oct 2006 | DE | national |