Patent Application
20140300916
The invention relates to the field of printing systems, and in particular, to recovering from errors that may arise during the printing process.
Print shops are typically medium or large scale facilities capable of supplying printing services to meet a variety of customer demands. For example, print shops are often used to print documents for mass-mailing (e.g., customer bills, advertisements, etc.). Because print shops engage in printing on a scale that is hard to match, their customer base is usually varied. Print shop clients may therefore include both large institutional clients (e.g., credit card companies and banks), and small clients (e.g., small businesses and churches).
Print shops are generally arranged to print incoming jobs from clients in a way that is economical, yet fast. Thus, print shops often include a number of high-volume printers capable of printing incoming jobs quickly and at high quality. These printers may be managed by operators who can remove paper jams and reload the printers with media. Print shops also typically include post-print devices that are used to process the printed documents of each job (e.g., stackers, staplers, cutters, binders, etc.). Because print shops serve a variety of clients, they are often tasked with printing jobs that have varying printing formats, delivery dates, and media requirements. Print shops therefore often use a centralized print server that receives incoming jobs and allows for jobs to be scheduled for printing at a printer.
In some cases, problems arise during the printing process. For instance, a printer may encounter a paper jam, run out of colorant, run out of media for a job, etc. Often the print server is configured to automatically reschedule jobs from the failed printer to a backup printer if errors occur. This ensures that the jobs continue to print while the error condition at the printer is reviewed by a print operator. However, this may cause unnecessary rescheduling for jobs when the error conditions may be quickly resolved.
Embodiments described herein provide a time delay before jobs are automatically rescheduled from a printer that has an error condition to a backup printer. The delay allows time for a print operator to assess the error condition and to possibly resolve the error condition before the job is automatically rescheduled to a backup printer. Thus, minor error conditions that may be readily solved by a print operator do not result in unnecessary rescheduling of jobs between printers. In some cases, rescheduling jobs between printers results in a ping-pong effect as printers go offline and online within a short amount of time, which is undesirable.
One embodiment is a control system for a printing system. The control system is operable to determine that a printer scheduled to print a job has an error condition, to identify the error condition at the printer, and to calculate a time delay based on the error condition before initiating a rescheduling process for the job to a backup printer. The control system is further operable to initiate the rescheduling process if the time delay has expired, and to cancel the rescheduling process if the error condition has ended before the time delay expires.
Another embodiment is a method for scheduling print job. The method comprises determining that a printer scheduled to print a job has an error condition, and to identify the error condition at the printer. The method further comprises calculating a time delay based on the error condition before initiating a rescheduling process for the job to a backup printer. The method further comprises initiating the rescheduling process if the time delay has expired, and to cancel the rescheduling process if the error condition has ended before the time delay expires.
Another embodiment is a non-transitory computer readable medium embodying programmed instructions executable by a processor. The instructions are operable to direct the processor to determine that a printer scheduled to print a job has an error condition, and to identify the error condition at the printer. The instructions further direct the processor to calculate a time delay based on the error condition before initiating a rescheduling process for the job to a backup printer. The instructions further direct the processor to initiate the rescheduling process if the time delay has expired, and to cancel the rescheduling process if the error condition has ended before the time delay has expired.
Other exemplary embodiments may be described below.
Some embodiments of the present invention are now described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings. The same reference number represents the same element or the same type of element on all drawings.
The figures and the following description illustrate specific exemplary embodiments of the invention. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements that, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the invention and are included within the scope of the invention. Furthermore, any examples described herein are intended to aid in understanding the principles of the invention, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. As a result, the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments or examples described below, but by the claims and their equivalents.
Print server 102 in this embodiment includes a control system 104 and a print queue 106. Control system 104 communicates with printers 112-114 to determine status information (e.g., error conditions, printing progress for jobs, etc.) for printers 112-114. Control system 104 further manages one or more jobs 108-111 stored by queue 106. Queue 106 generally includes any storage system that is able to spool or store jobs 108-111 that are scheduled for printing at printers 112-114. Some examples of queue 106 include hard disk drives, flash drives, Random Access Memory, etc.
In this embodiment, print server 102 is further configured to enable backup printing for jobs 108-111. Backup printing allows server 102 to respond to error conditions that may arise at printers 112-114 by rescheduling jobs from a failed printer to a backup printer. This ensures that jobs 108-111 continue to print even though a job may be scheduled to print at a printer that is no longer available. For example, if job 111 was originally scheduled to print at printer 114 and printer 114 becomes unavailable, then print server 102 may be configured to automatically reschedule job 111 at one of the other printers 112-113.
In prior systems, automatic rescheduling of jobs occurs regardless of the type of error condition that may arise at a printer or how long it may take an operator to resolve the error condition. For instance, a simple paper jam at a printer may put the printer offline, thereby triggering a rescheduling of jobs for the failed printer to other printers. This can be problematic when jobs are shuffled from one printer to another. For instance, a print operator may be able to clear a paper jam rather quickly, thereby allowing the failed printer to return online for printing jobs. However, when the failed printer returns online, jobs previously scheduled for the printer may have already been rescheduled for other printers. This may then cause jobs to be rescheduled back to the now-online printer, thereby initiating a ping-pong scheduling effect. Or, the print operator may be tasked to manually reschedule jobs back to the printer when it returns online, thereby causing extra work for the print operator.
In this embodiment, control system 104 detects that a printer has failed due to an error condition, and does not automatically initiate a rescheduling process for the jobs from the failed printer to a backup printer right away. Rather, control system 104 implements a time delay that provides the operator time to correct the error. If the error is corrected before the time delay expires, then control system 104 cancels the rescheduling process. However, if the time delay expires before the error condition ends, then control system 104 initiates the rescheduling process.
In some embodiments, the time delay is configured by the print operator. For instance, the print operator may configure print server 102 to implement a time delay of a few minutes for a paper jam error condition at a printer, which would allow the print operator time to clear the jam. In like manner, the print operator may also configure print server 102 to implement a time delay of some tens of minutes for more complicated error conditions (e.g., communication error with a printer) to allow the print operator more time to correct the error condition.
Consider an example whereby a print operator is tasked with printing a job at printing system 100. Jobs 108-111 are received by print server 102 (e.g., from one or more clients or host systems not shown), and are scheduled for printing at printers 112-114. The scheduling of jobs 108-111 may be performed automatically and/or by a print operator. Generally, scheduling of jobs 108-111 is performed at a particular printer based on the type of media for a job, the type of colorant for job, etc. that is available at a printer.
As discussed previously, primary printers may be assigned one or more backup printer to ensure that jobs continue to print if the primary printer fails. For instance, at start of day, a print operator may configure print server 102 to utilize one or more backup printers 112-113 for printer 114 in cases whereby printer 114 becomes unavailable to print jobs.
In step 202, control system 104 determines that a printer for a job has an error condition (e.g., printer 114, marked with an X in
In step 204, control system 104 determines the error condition at the printer. Control system may query a printer in error to determine the error condition. For instance, control system 104 may query printer 114 utilizing SNMP, JMF, or some other protocol.
In step 206, control system 104 determines a time delay before initiating a rescheduling process for the job to a backup printer. In this embodiment, the time delay is based on the error condition determined by control system 104. In some cases, different error conditions may be configured with different values of time delays. In other cases, the error conditions may be configured with the same value of time delay. Either case is a matter of design choice.
In step 208, control system 104 determines if the time delay has expired. If the time delay has expired, then step 210 is performed to initiate the rescheduling process for the job to the backup printer. If the time delay has not expired, then step 212 is performed.
In step 212, control system 104 determines if the error condition at the printer has ended. For instance, control system 104 may periodically query the failed printer to determine the status of the error condition, may receive input from the print operator regarding the error condition, etc. If the error condition has not ended, then step 208 is performed again to determine if the time delay has expired. However, if the error condition has ended before the time delay expires, then step 214 is performed.
In step 214, control system 104 initiates the rescheduling process to reschedule the jobs to the backup printer. For instance, if printer 112 is assigned as a backup printer for printer 114, then jobs originally scheduled for printer 114 are rescheduled for printer 112. Further, the rescheduled jobs may be pending for a failed printer, may have been currently printing on the failed printer, etc., as a matter of design choice.
Consider in the following example that a print operator wishes to configure a printer to utilize delays for automatic backup printing. To do so, the print operator may utilize a Graphical User Interface (GUI).
The print operator may then enter a recovery delay 308 for the error condition(s) that were added to the configure conditions window 306, and assign the recovery delay 308 to the error condition(s) using the assign button 310. In this example, the print operator has assigned a recovery delay of 5 minutes for a paper jammed error condition at the keezar printer, has assigned an 8 minute recovery delay for an output full error condition at the keezer printer, and has assigned a zero minute recovery delay for a cannot contact error condition at the keezer printer.
Based on the settings shown for the keezar printer in
GUI 300 in the example illustrates a number of error conditions that are assigned different recovery times. In this example, a paper jam error condition is assigned a recovery time of 5 minutes while an output full error condition is assigned a recovery time of 8 minutes. In cases whereby multiple error conditions may occur within about the same time, then rescheduling the jobs to the backup printer may be delayed based on the shortest time for the assigned conditions, the longest time for the assigned conditions, etc., as a matter of design choice. For instance, if a paper jam error condition and an output full error condition occurs at about the same time at the keezar printer, then rescheduling the jobs to the pass1 printer may be delayed until after the 8 minute delay expires, which is the longest time delay configured for the error conditions in the assigned conditions window 312. However, in cases where some error conditions are resolved during the wait time while other remain, a recalculation of the time delay may occur based on the remaining error conditions and their respectively assigned recovery delays. For instance, if the output full error condition is resolved during the time delay, then the recovery delay may be recalculated based on the remaining error conditions (e.g., 5 minutes as per the paper jammed condition). This allows for a more flexible approach to implementing the recovery delay in systems that utilize delayed rescheduling of jobs to a backup printer.
The invention can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment containing both hardware and software elements. In one embodiment, the invention is implemented in software, which includes but is not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.
Furthermore, the invention can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium 406 providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium 406 can be any apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
The medium 406 can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer-readable medium 406 include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include compact disk—read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk—read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.
A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code will include one or more processors 402 coupled directly or indirectly to memory 408 through a system bus 410. The memory 408 can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code is retrieved from bulk storage during execution.
Input/output or I/O devices 404 (including but not limited to keyboards, displays, pointing devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers.
Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems, such a through host systems interfaces 412, or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.
Although specific embodiments were described herein, the scope of the invention is not limited to those specific embodiments. The scope of the invention is defined by the following claims and any equivalents thereof.
