The present invention relates generally to an apparatus for reducing the force applied to a magnetic roller by toner in an extended yield toner cartridge.
At one time expensive, bulky, and affordable only to large businesses, laser printers have become an accessible and economic option for the modern consumer. Laser printers offer a number of advantages compared to inkjet printers, the most prominent of which is the lower operating cost. The cost per page of inkjet printers is an order of magnitude higher than that of laser printers. These benefits can be enhanced through the use of extended yield cartridges, which hold more toner than a regular cartridge. Extended yield toner cartridges increase the amount of pages that can be printed with a single cartridge. They provide further benefits in that the cost per page is less than that of a regular or starter cartridge. Additionally, material use and costs are reduced compared to regular cartridges, resulting in a more environmentally friendly and cost-efficient toner cartridge. However, extended yield cartridges are prone to premature failure and quick wearing out of parts, as the cartridges hold more toner than originally designed for.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to reduce the force applied to a magnetic roller in an extended yield cartridges by providing a wall which minimizes contact between the magnetic roller and the stored toner.
All illustrations of the drawings are for the purpose of describing selected versions of the present invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
The present invention is an improved printer cartridge provided for laser printers. Designed to reduce the stress applied to developer components when using extended yield cartridges, the present invention can be implemented as a retrofit to an existing toner cartridge or as an independent toner cartridge. Shown in
Further elaborating upon the printing assembly 1, the hopper 13 comprises a feed section 131 and a medium receiving volume 132, as seen in
In order to reduce pressure on the magnetic developer roller 12, the barrier 2 is mounted within the cartridge casing 11. The barrier 2 is positioned adjacent to magnetic developer roller 12 and into the feed section 131, such that it separates a portion of the magnetic developer roller 12 from the medium 3 stored within the hopper 13. In this manner the barrier 2 limits exposure of the surface area of the magnetic developer roller 12 to the medium 3 (i.e. the toner) in the feed section 131. The reduced exposure minimizes contact between the magnetic developer roller 12 and the medium 3, which in turn reduces the overall pressure experienced by the magnetic developer roller 12. This is extremely beneficial for extended yield cartridges where the amount of medium 3 stored in the hopper 13 exceeds Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) specifications. The positioning of the barrier 2 is illustrated in
The barrier 2, as illustrated in
The positioning of the barrier 2 creates a medium-free chamber 16, the boundaries of which are delineated by the magnetic developer roller 12, the barrier 2, and the cartridge casing 11. This medium-free chamber 16 is visualized in
The base 21 is adjacently connected to the cartridge casing 11, ensuring the barrier 2 remains in place and is not moved due to pressure applied by the medium 3. In the preferred embodiment the base 21 is connected by means of a double-sided adhesive, which is adjacently connected to the base 21 opposite the wall 22. The double-sided adhesive (e.g. double-sided tape) can then be pressed against the cartridge casing 11, allowing the barrier 2 to be secured in position. The use of a double-sided tape adhesive serves as an easy, inexpensive, and tool-free method for securing the present invention in place. Potentially, in other embodiments, alternative methods of connecting the base 21 to the cartridge casing 11 could be use. For example, simple fasteners (e.g. screws or nails) can be drilled or hammered through the base 21 into the cartridge casing 11. This alternative connection is very secure, but requires more tools and may be more difficult to use in a retrofitting process than the preferred double-sided adhesive. Another option is a variation of the preferred double-sided adhesive, instead using a fluid adhesive such as glue. Though not as clean as a double-sided adhesive, it is relatively simple to use and is also does not require tools or drilling for utilization. Ultimately, any alternative connection method is suitable for use with the present invention as long as it is capable of holding the barrier 2 in place and not being moved, damaged, or otherwise compromised by pressure applied from the medium 3.
It is noted that in order to maximize effectiveness the barrier 2, i.e. its comprised base 21 and wall 22, should be connected across the cartridge casing 11. Otherwise gaps may be left between the barrier 2 and the interior faces of the cartridge casing 11, allowing at least some of the medium 3 to bypass the barrier 2.
The wall 22 of the base 21 comprises a chamfered edge 221. This chamfered edge 221 is positioned on an edge of the wall 22 opposite the base 21, at a “top face” of the wall 22 if considering the face which is connected to the base 21 to be a “bottom face”. The chamfered edge 221 is oriented towards the feed section 131 and away from the magnetic developer roller 12. Returning to the top face reference, the chamfered edge 221 can be considered a second top edge of the wall 22. A first top edge is positioned adjacent to the magnetic developer roller 12 while the second top edge (i.e. the chamfered edge 221) is positioned adjacent to the first top edge opposite the magnetic developer roller 12. This implementation of the chamfered edge 221 is beneficial as it slopes towards the feed section 131, ensuring that excess medium 3 remains in the hopper 13. If the chamfer was positioned on the edge adjacent to the magnetic developer roller 12, the medium 3 could potentially slide down the chamfered edge 221 towards the medium-free chamber 16 formed between the magnetic developer roller 12, the barrier 2, and the cartridge casing 11. Since the medium-free chamber 16 is essential in reducing the total force applied to the magnetic developer roller 12, sealing the medium 3-free chamber 16 is critical as any medium 3 that manages to get in reduces the effectiveness of the present invention.
The chamfered edge 221 (and subsequently the top face of the wall 22) is preferably parallel with a rotational axis of the magnetic developer roller 12, such that the top face of the wall 22 is coplanar with the rotational axis. This positioning of the top wall 22 results in a substantial reduction of the exposure surface area of the magnetic developer roller 12 to the medium 3, in the realm of 50%. This positioning also allows for some contact between the medium 3 and the magnetic developer roller 12, which is necessary for the printing assembly 1 to function normally; if the medium 3 cannot come in contact with the magnetic developer roller 12 at all, then the printing assembly 1 will not be capable of printing.
The printing assembly 1 further comprises a doctor blade 14 and a sealing blade 15, both known in the art. The doctor blade 14 interacts with the magnetic developer roller 12, dislodging excess medium 3 as the magnetic developer roller 12 rotates to ensure that only a thin film remains on the magnetic developer roller 12. This thin film is ideal and desirable for transfer to the photo conductor drum, which the magnetic developer roller 12 as it rotates past the doctor blade 14. The doctor blade 14 is positioned within the cartridge casing 11 such that it tangentially engages the magnetic developer roller 12. In this manner the doctor blade 14 is capable of scraping off medium 3 from the magnetic developer roller 12, leaving only the aforementioned desired thin film of medium 3. To ensure the doctor blade 14 properly contacts the magnetic developer roller 12, the doctor blade 14 is radially and adjacently positioned around the magnetic developer roller 12. Relative to the rotation of the magnetic developer roller 12, the doctor blade 14 is positively offset from the barrier 2. That is, the barrier 2 is positioned both tangent to the magnetic developer roller 12 and radially adjacent to the doctor blade 14 around the magnetic developer roller 12. As such, the area of the magnetic developer roller 12 between the doctor blade 14 and the barrier 2 is the only area exposed to the full pressure of the medium 3. Thanks to the present invention's utilization of the barrier 2, this exposed area is only in the realm of 25%, compared to other inventions in which up to 50% or even more of the magnetic developer roller 12 may be subject to higher than rated pressures from overloaded medium 3, such as with extended yield cartridges. By reducing the amount of medium 3 in contact with the magnetic developer roller 12, the doctor blade 14 encounters less resistance and pressure from the medium 3 that is scraped off from the magnetic developer roller 12. The reduced pressure experience by the doctor blade 14 correspondingly minimizes operational wear and tear and subsequently increases lifespan.
The sealing blade 15, which is positioned opposite the doctor blade 14 between the photoconductor drum and barrier 2, serves to remove excess medium 3 still attached to the magnetic developer roller 12 as the magnetic developer roller's 12 rotation brings the excess medium 3 past the photo conductor drum and back into the feed section 131. This allows the surface of the magnetic developer roller 12 to be cleaned before it receives a new coating of medium 3. Similar to the doctor blade 14, the sealing blade 15 is positioned within the sealing blade 15 where it tangentially engages the magnetic developer roller 12. The sealing blade 15 is also radially and adjacently positioned around the magnetic developer roller 12, similar to the doctor blade 14. Unlike with the doctor blade 14, however, the sealing blade 15 is positioned to completely remove medium 3 from the magnetic developer roller 12, rather than leaving a thin film as with the doctor blade 14. The positioning of the sealing blade 15 if further defined as being adjacent to the medium 3-free chamber 16 opposite the barrier 2. Describing the barrier 2 in relation to the sealing blade 15, the barrier 2 is positioned tangent to the magnetic developer roller 12 and opposite the sealing blade 15 around the magnetic developer roller 12.
The barrier 2 as described reduces pressure on the magnetic developer roller 12. As a result, this expands the lifespan of the magnetic developer roller 12. By reducing the amount of medium 3 that contacts the magnetic developer roller 12, the benefits are further extended to other components that contact the magnetic developer roller 12, specifically the doctor blade 14 and the sealing blade 15. Thus, the barrier 2 reduces the pressure and resistance encountered by these components, allowing them longer. Furthermore, the reduction of experienced pressure makes the doctor blade 14 and sealing blade 15 more stable; they are less likely to be pushed out of place due to excessive force from the medium 3 via the magnetic developer roller 12. Because their precise positioning is crucial to ideal performance, minimizing operation wear and tear is especially beneficial for the doctor blade 14 and sealing blade 15. The present invention mitigates these downsides and other negatives to using extended yield cartridges and through its inclusion protects core printing components such as the magnetic developer roller 12, doctor blade 14, and sealing blade 15.
The present invention can be assembled using a variety of construction methods. For example, the base 21 and barrier 2 can be constructed or provided separately, and then later connected to each other. Or, preferably, injection molding can be used to create the present invention as a single piece. As with other aspects of the present invention, the construction process used can vary with different embodiments.
Although the invention has been explained in relation to its preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that many other possible modifications and variations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed.
The current application claims a priority to the U.S. Provisional Patent application Ser. No. 61/907,761 filed on Nov. 22, 2013.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61907761 | Nov 2013 | US |