Printer hammerbank with a magnetic shunt

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6779935
  • Patent Number
    6,779,935
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 6, 2003
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 24, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
An impact line printer comprising a print ribbon wound on a pair of spools for traversal in two directions across a plurality of print hammers having tips for impacting the print ribbon to print on a media. A permanent magnet having two pole pieces having pole piece ends in adjacent relationship to the print hammers retains the print hammers until a coil in associated relationship with each pole piece releases the magnetic retention of the hammers. A magnetically permeable extension is longitudinally adjacent each hammer which acts as a magnetic shunt to permit more rapid printing rates and higher impacts. The extensions conduct and shunt magnetic flux from the hammers through the longitudinally adjacent extensions.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The field of this invention lies within the art of impact printing. Impact printing can take place by a hammer having a tip which impacts a ribbon to place a series of dots or a dot matrix format on an underlying media. The invention more specifically is directed toward hammerbanks of line printers having a series of hammers which are retained by a permanent magnet and are released for impact by an electrical coil which overcomes the permanent magnetism.




2. Background of the Invention and Prior Art




The prior art with respect to impact printers generally incorporates a number of impact printers of various designs and various configurations. One of the preferred types of impact printers are those impact printers referred to as line printers. The configuration of line printers is such where a hammerbank having a number of printing tips impacts a print ribbon overlying a media to be printed upon. The hammers are held and retained by a permanent magnet prior to being released for impact. The permanent magnet provides a certain amount of magnetic flux to the hammer in order to retain it. The flux required is dependent upon the size, form, configuration, and magnetic characteristics of the hammer.




In the design of hammerheads and the hammers in general, there are key elements with regard to maintaining sufficient flux to retain or pull down the hammers. At the same time consideration must be given in allowing the hammers to fire on a rapid and high impact basis.




The retention and return of the hammers is oftentimes referred to as the pull down force by the permanent magnets.




Other characteristics of the hammers must consider the natural frequency of the spring. This is a criteria as to the firing at a particular rate.




Another criteria is the pull down force required by the permanent magnets. Generally, as the mass of the hammerspring head increases, a greater stored energy can be maintained. However, as can be appreciated, this can be undesirable inasmuch as a greater mass of the head of the hammer can decrease the operational firing rate.




This invention is a significant improvement over the prior art by reason of the fact that it utilizes and replaces part of the hammerhead mass with shunt mass. This causes the hammerhead to be lighter and accelerate faster when released.




To the foregoing extent, the shunts or the fingers that are emplaced between the hammers allows the mass of the hammerhead to be reduced. At the same time the shunts help to maintain the pull down force or retention force by the permanent magnets. Therefore, the natural frequency of the spring can be increased allowing the spring to fire at an increased rate with the same impact energy.




Another improvement of this invention and an object thereof is to create a greater pull down force or retention force without an increase to the hammer mass. This allows the use of a stiffer spring thereby increasing stored energy in the spring. The net result is to increase the impact energy without a decrease in the firing rate.




Both of the foregoing aspects of the impact energy and the operational firing rate can be increased by a trade-off between the two. Thus, one skilled in the art can design the line printers of this invention in a manner to increase impact energy or firing rate. For instance, when multiple forms are being utilized, higher impact is required. On the other hand, when thinner forms are required and a greater speed or firing rate of the hammerbank is required, faster printing can take place.




Thus, with this invention, greater impact and faster firing rates can be accomplished as set forth hereinafter.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In summation, this invention comprises one or more hammerbank magnetic shunts emplaced between hammers in order to allow a larger magnetic flux to be applied to the bottom of the hammers of the hammerbank through the pole pieces than that flux required to saturate the hammerhead cross section.




More specifically, the invention incorporates the aspects of a hammer shunt plate made of a highly permeable magnetic material having fingers that are placed between the hammerheads. The flux leaving the bottom of the pole piece in a dual pole piece arrangement enters the bottom of the hammerhead. The quantity of flux entering the bottom of the hammerhead is beyond the saturation flux of the hammerhead cross section. This saturation causes an increase in the MMF drop along the hammerhead forcing the flux into the shunt fingers.




A key element is to cause the entire flux from the pole piece to enter the bottom of the hammerhead. It is this flux that creates a magnetic force pulling the hammer down. The use of the shunt fingers replaces part of the hammerhead mass with the shunt finger mass so that the hammerhead can be lighter and accelerate faster when released.




The invention can also allow a reduction of the mass of the hammerheads while maintaining pull down force. This increases the natural frequency of the spring force allowing the hammer to be fired at an increased rate.




On the other hand, a greater pull down force or retention can be achieved without an increase to the head mass providing for increased stored energy so that greater impact energy without a decrease in the operational firing rate can be accommodated.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a perspective view of a line printer.





FIG. 2

shows a perspective view of the prior art as to a double row hammerbank in a fragmented configuration as seen in the direction of lines


2





2


of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

shows a perspective fragmented portion of the invention utilizing the shunts.





FIG. 4

shows a sectional view of a hammer of this invention as sectioned along lines


4





4


of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 5

shows a sectional view of a shunt as sectioned along lines


5





5


of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 6

shows a pole piece interacting with the respective flux of a hammer of the hammerbank.





FIG. 7

shows an elevation view of the flux interacting with the pole pieces and the shunts of this invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Looking more specifically at

FIG. 1

, a perspective view of a line printer has been shown. The line printer can be mounted on a stand, base, or be incorporated in a cabinet. In this particular showing, a line printer


10


is shown having a base frame


12


. The base frame


12


mounts the various components of the line printer including hubs


14


and


16


. Hubs


14


and


16


are utilized to mount spools


18


and


20


. Spools


18


and


20


are respectively the feed ribbon spool and takeup spool.




Wrapped around the spools


18


and


20


is a print ribbon


22


which is utilized to print on a media


24






The media


24


is shown overlying a support plate


25


. Such media can be fan fold forms., bar code labels, combinations of plastic and paper labels and formats, paper media for graphics, and other such items. Depending upon the thickness of the media


24


, the high impact of printing that is developed by this invention can improve the multi-form and multi-layered printing by the improved impact. Also, depending upon the speed that is desired for printing on the media


24


, the invention improves the rapidity of movement of the media for increased printing by the ribbon


22


.




A well known method of moving the media


24


is by tractors


26


and


28


driven by the media drive shaft


30


. The media drive shaft


30


also incorporates the ability to increment the media


24


by a manual knurled knob


32


. This moves the media


24


on a manual basis for indexing, alignment, or other purposes.




A printer controller is utilized to control the various components and cause the printing and firing of the hammers against the ribbon


22


. This includes driving and controlling the hubs


14


and


16


for traversing the hammers to be described hereinafter.




Looking more specifically at

FIG. 2

, it can be seen that a hammerbank of the prior art has been shown, namely hammerbank


36


. The hammerbank


36


is formed with a machined or cast base


38


having an elongated channel or groove


40


. The elongated channel or groove


40


receives a circuit board


42


therein which provides the driving of the respective coils to cause firing of the hammers.




The showing of

FIG. 2

is of a double row hammerbank having hammers


46


on the top and the bottom rows with respective tips


48


at the ends of the enlarged heads


50


on the hammers. The hammers


46


are formed on frets


54


. These frets


54


are secured by screws


56


.




A cover plate


60


is utilized to cover the hammers. The cover plate


60


incorporates a number of openings


62


that are indexed respectively to the tips


48


of the hammers


46


. The cover plate


60


can seat proximate to the frets


54


. It is indexed to the tips


48


which are released through the openings


62


against a print ribbon such as print ribbon


22


. The tips


48


impact against the ribbon


22


and the media


24


which is attendantly masked by a mask. The mask masking the media


24


from the ribbon


22


has openings indexed to openings


62


which receive the impacts by the tips


48


.




In order to secure the cover


60


to the base


36


, indexing studs


66


are utilized and various securements through openings such as opening


68


can be utilized or other such securement.




Looking more specifically at

FIG. 3

, it can be seen wherein a hammerbank of this invention has been shown in a fragmented perspective form. The hammerbank replaces the prior art in great measure whether it be a single hammerbank or row of hammers as in the showing of

FIG. 3

or a double hammerbank showing as in

FIG. 2. A

substitution would also be fundamentally with regard to the drives from the printed circuit board and the permanent magnet as set forth hereinafter.




Looking more specifically at the invention of

FIG. 3

, it can be seen that a base or support of the hammerbank


80


has been shown analogous to the base


38


. A group of hammers


82


have been shown that have been formed on a fret


84


analogous to the fret


54


of the prior art. The respective hammers


82


have heads terminating in tips


86


. The fret


84


with the hammers


82


can be secured by screws or other fittings


88


into the base


80


of the hammerbank.




Looking more specifically at the upper portion of

FIG. 3

, it can be seen that a fret


90


has been shown with a plurality of fingers, extensions, appendages, shunts, or shunt extensions


94


that have been formed from the fret


90


. The fret


90


is formed with an upper shunt plate portion


91


to which the extensions


94


are connected. These extensions or shunts have been secured on the base


80


by the plate


91


as to the respective formation of the fret shunts by means of screws or other securement means


96


.




Both the extensions


94


and shunt plate portion


91


are formed of a highly permeable magnetic material. In effect, conductance of flux to a significant degree is desired through the extension


94


and the plate


91


which form the entire fret


90


.




Here again, a cover


60


can be utilized to cover the hammer


82


and the respective tips


86


.




Again, looking at

FIG. 3

, a cover


102


has been shown analogous to the cover


60


of the prior art. This cover


102


also has openings


104


through which the tips


86


can project for impact printing. Here again, any type of cover or plate can be utilized in order to provide for the cover of the line printer.




A sectional view as shown in

FIG. 4

shows the hammers


82


with the fret


84


on which they are formed. The hammers


82


have the tips


86


that are shown with an enlarged hammerhead


108


. The enlarged hammerhead


108


is mounted on a relatively narrow spring portion


110


.




Adjacent to the hammerhead


108


are the shunts, extensions, or fingers


94


set forth hereinbefore that have been formed and mounted on the shunt fret


90


. Within the hammerbank base and the channel


81


analogous to channel


40


of the prior art, is a printed circuit board


116


analogous to prior art circuit board


42


. The printed circuit board


116


has terminals


118


and


120


that allow the circuit board


116


to be connected to a printer controller.




Within a channel is a permanent magnet


122


. The magnet


122


retains the hammers


82


into a position in close proximity to a lower pole piece extension


126


and an upper pole piece extension


128


.




The pole piece extensions


126


and


128


are respectively extensions of pole pieces


130


and


134


having coils


136


and


138


wrapped around the pole pieces. The permanent magnetism of magnet


122


pulls the hammerhead


108


into juxtaposition with the pole piece extensions


126


and


128


. The hammers


82


are retained until released by a magnetomotive force through coils


134


and


136


as driven by circuit board


116


.





FIG. 4

shows the extensions of the pole pieces


126


and


128


. The pole pieces are relatively flat on their exposed surfaces. The pole pieces


126


and


128


have been shown in the elevation view of FIG.


7


.

FIG. 7

shows the pole piece ends of the pole pieces


126


and


128


seated between the fingers, extensions, or shunts


94


as shown previously in

FIGS. 3 and 4

.




Again, looking more specifically at

FIG. 5

, it can be seen that the cover


102


is shown with the openings


104


through which the tips


86


of the hammers


82


can project.




As seen from the cross section of

FIG. 5

, the hammerhead


108


should be designed such that it is closer to the pole piece than the extensions


94


. This is in order to assure that the hammerhead


108


receives a significant amount of the flux rather than it flowing initially before hammer release from the pole pieces


126


and


128


through the extensions


94


.




As will be seen in

FIG. 5

, a showing of the enlarged hammerhead


108


of the hammer


82


is such wherein it is closer to the pole piece


126


and


128


ends. This is in order to rely upon the lesser amount of magnetic resistance in any air gap so that the pole pieces will function with respect to the hammers


82


rather than flux being imparted to the extensions


94


initially.




The showing of

FIG. 5

also includes a wall portion


140


. The wall portion


140


is fundamentally the area that separates each respective series of pole pieces


130


and


134


. These also separate the pole pieces


126


and


128


ends so that a finite relatively smooth surface is seen at the ends of pole pieces


126


and


128


. In effect, the pole pieces


126


and


128


ends are substantially flush with the surface of the base


80


of the hammerbank.




As previously stated the base


80


can be made from a casting or milled bar. The pole pieces


130


and


134


are inserted therein and then potted with a potting material or other material which provides the separation walls


140


as can be seen in the two respective

FIGS. 4 and 5

. The potting is filled in around the pole pieces


130


and


134


as well as the coils


136


and


138


.




The showings of

FIGS. 4

,


5


,


6


, and


7


are such wherein a dynamic released configuration is shown. Normally, when the hammers


82


are retracted or in the pulled back position, they are adjacent to the ends of the pole pieces


126


and


128


. In

FIG. 6

, the hammer


82


has been released so that it is specifically moving into an impacting position with its tip


86


against the print ribbon


22


. However, after release, the pull back force of the flux at the ends of pole pieces


126


and


128


pulls the hammerhead


108


back into contact therewith.




Looking more specifically at

FIGS. 6 and 7

, it can be seen that the lines of flux flow from the lower pole piece


126


end through the hammerhead


108


and shunts


94


and then back through the upper pole piece


128


end. The division of flux between the hammerhead


108


and shunt pieces


94


depends on the cross sectional area of the hammerhead which relates to the flux required to saturate.




The concept and features of this invention are such where the shunts or extensions


94


are formed from the fret


90


which includes the shunt plate


91


. Both the plate


91


or fret


90


and extension


94


are made of a highly permeable magnetic material.




The flux as seen in

FIGS. 6 and 7

leaves the pole piece


126


end in order to retract the hammerhead


108


into a pull down position. The design is such where the quantity of flux is beyond the saturation flux of the hammerhead


108


. This causes an increase in the MMF drop along the hammerhead


108


forcing the flux into the shunt fingers or extension


94


as can be seen in FIG.


7


.




The design and path of the magnetism of the permanent magnet


122


is through the pole pieces


126


and


128


. For improved performance the entire flux of the pole piece should enter the bottom of the hammerhead


108


. It is this flux that creates the magnetic force pulling the hammerhead


108


backwardly after release. The dynamic position of the firing of the hammer


82


with the respective hammerheads


108


are shown released in

FIGS. 4

,


5


, and


6


. When the hammer


82


is pulled back, the spring portion


110


is slightly bowed, and upper and lower portions of the hammerhead


108


are in close contact or adjacent relationship with the ends of pole pieces


126


and


128


.




Inasmuch as the mass of the hammerhead is replaced with the mass of the shunt fingers or extensions


94


, the hammerhead


108


can be lighter and can accelerate faster when released. The foregoing results in the shunt fingers or extensions


94


allowing the mass of the hammerhead


108


to be reduced while at the same time maintaining the pull down force or pull back force through the pole piece


126


and


128


ends. Therefore, the natural frequency of the spring portion


110


can be increased. This allows the hammers


82


to fire at an increased rate with the same energy.




A greater pull down force can be achieved without an increase in the mass of the hammerhead


108


or hammer


82


. Thus, the use of a stiffer spring


110


can be utilized which increases the stored energy in the spring. The net effect is that an increase in the hammer


82


impact by the tips


86


increases the impact energy without a decrease in the operational firing rate.




The foregoing improvements can be effected depending upon whether a faster firing rate is desired or a greater impact. In the alternative, a degree of both increased firing rates and increased impact force can be effected with a balance between each characteristic. A faster firing rate would be such where greater throughput of the printer is experienced. On the other hand, when multi-forms having 4, 5, 6, or more layers are utilized, a greater impact is desirable.




Depending upon the net results desired, either the increased rate or the higher impact can be implemented depending upon the particular design and functions of the printer. The effect is so that both the impact energy and operational firing rate can be increased by a trade-off between one of the foregoing design characteristics.




The cover


102


can rest on top of the shunt fingers or extensions


94


to provide a low reluctance path to the cover. This allows the cover mass to act as part of the flux shunting mechanism of the fingers or extensions


94


. It has been found that the shunt path of the fingers or extensions


94


are such where greater flux is carried through them rather than through the cover


102


.



Claims
  • 1. A line printer comprising:a plurality of hammers mounted on a hammerbank having printing tips that impact a print ribbon for printing on a given media; a permanent magnet for retaining said hammers; an electrical drive for releasing said hammers from retention by said permanent magnet; and, two magnetically permeable extensions in longitudinal placement on either side of a first one of said hammers and along the same plane as said hammers for shunting flux from said permanent magnet.
  • 2. The line printer as claimed in claim 1 further comprising:said permanent magnet is magnetically connected to pairs of pole pieces with ends in adjacent relationship to said hammers.
  • 3. The line printer as claimed in claim 2 further comprising:each hammer has an enlarged hammerhead; and, said hammerhead has one portion in adjacent relationship to one pole piece end, and the other portion in adjacent relationship to the other pole piece end.
  • 4. The line printer as claimed in claim 3 further comprising:the flux from one of said pole piece end travels through said hammerhead to the other of said pole piece end in a saturated or greater state.
  • 5. The line printer as claimed in claim 4 wherein:said extension shunts a portion of said flux from said hammerhead.
  • 6. The line printer as claimed in claim 5 further comprising:a cover overlying said extensions which serve to shunt a portion of the flux.
  • 7. The line printer as claimed in claim 1 further comprising:said hammerbank is formed with two rows of hammers and two rows of extensions for printing in double rows.
  • 8. The line printer of claim 1, wherein said flux travels into and out of the extensions through the sides of the first one of the hammers and the sides of the extensions.
  • 9. A line printer comprising:a row of hammers formed on frets mounted on a base; a permanent magnet magnetically connected to two pole pieces, each pole piece having an end in adjacent relationship to one of said hammers for pulling back and retaining said hammers against said pole piece ends; and, two magnetic shunts, one on each side of a first one of said hammers and on the same plane as the row of hammers for shunting flux from said hammers to one of said pole pieces.
  • 10. The line printer as claimed in claim 9 further comprising:said hammers have an enlarged head; and, the flux from one of said pole piece ends saturates the hammer.
  • 11. The line printer as claimed in claim 9 further comprising:said shunts are formed as extensions between adjacent hammers.
  • 12. The line printer as claimed in claim 11 further comprising:said shunts are formed as one or more extensions from a plate.
  • 13. The line printer as claimed in claim 12 further comprising:said shunts are aligned between said hammers in adjacent longitudinal side by side relationship.
  • 14. The line printer of claim 9, wherein the two magnetic shunts flux through the sides of the two magnetic shunts and the sides of the first one of said hammers.
  • 15. An impact line printer comprising:a pair of hubs that are driven in a rotational manner; a print ribbon wound on a pair of spools mounted on said hubs for traversal in two directions; a plurality of print hammers having tips for impacting said print ribbon to print on a media; a permanent magnet having two pole pieces with pole piece ends in adjacent relationship to said print hammers for retaining said print hammers; a coil in associated relationship with each pole piece for releasing the magnetic retention of said hammers; and, two magnetically permeable extensions, each adjacent to a first one of the hammers along a longitudinal direction of the print hammers, which act as magnetic shunts.
  • 16. The printer as claimed in claim 15 further comprising:said extensions are formed with a plate having a plurality of extensions; and, said hammers are formed on a plate having a plurality of hammers.
  • 17. The printer as claimed in claim 15 further comprising:said hammers have an enlarged head and an intermediate thinner portion between said head and said plate.
  • 18. The printer as claimed in claim 15 wherein:said extensions are at a greater distance from said pole piece ends than said hammers when said hammers are pulled back.
  • 19. The printer as claimed in claim 15 further comprising:a hammerbank cover that serves as a partial magnetic shunt with said extensions.
  • 20. The printer as claimed in claim 15 wherein:said hammers are arranged in two rows for printing double rows of print.
  • 21. The printer of claim 15, wherein the two magnetically permeable extensions shunt flux through the sides of the two extensions and the sides of the first one of said hammers.
  • 22. A magnetic shunt and print hammer system for a line printer comprising:a plurality of hammers having printing tips for printing by an ink ribbon; a permanent magnet having a pair of pole pieces with pole piece ends in adjacent relationship to said hammers to retain said hammers; an electrical drive for releasing said hammers from said permanent magnetism; and, two magnetically conductive extensions placed on either side of and in longitudinal relationship to a first one of said hammers for shunting a magnetic force between said pole pieces.
  • 23. The magnetic shunt and print hammer system as claimed in claim 22 further comprising:hammers having a spring portion.
  • 24. The magnetic shunt and print hammer system as claimed in claim 22 further comprising:said extensions are mounted or formed on a magnetically conductive plate which serves in part as a shunt with said extensions.
  • 25. The system of claim 22, wherein the two magnetically conductive extensions shunt flux through the sides of the two extensions and the sides of the first one of said hammers.
  • 26. A method of printing comprising:providing a line printer having a plurality of hammers which impact a ribbon which traverses between two spools; retaining said hammers until release by a permanent magnet having two pole pieces with pole piece ends in adjacent relationship to said hammers; and, conducting and shunting permanent magnetism from said hammers through extensions adjacent to both sides of each of the hammers and along the same plane as said plurality of hammers.
  • 27. The method as claimed in claim 26 further comprising:providing a gap between said extensions and said pole pieces greater than any gap between said hammer and said pole pieces when the hammers are retained before firing.
  • 28. The method as claimed in claim 26 further comprising:said hammers having an enlarged head and an intermediate spring portion.
  • 29. The method as claimed in claim 28 further comprising:providing extensions mounted or formed on a magnetically permeable member, and, shunting magnetic flux in part through said magnetically permeable member.
  • 30. The method of claim 26, wherein the shunting is through the sides of the extensions and the sides of the hammers.
  • 31. A method of shunting magnetic flux in a line printer comprising:providing a plurality of hammers in alignment for printing by impacts against a ribbon; retaining said hammers by a permanent magnet until released for impacting said ribbon; and, shunting magnetic flux in part through extensions located on either side of said hammers and on the same plane as said hammers for a return path of said flux to said permanent magnet through the side of said hammers.
  • 32. The method as claimed in claim 31 further comprising:providing pole pieces magnetically connected to said permanent magnet; and, shunting flux by said extensions from one pole piece to the other.
  • 33. The method as claimed in claim 32 further comprising:providing pole pieces having ends adjacent to said hammers; and, conducting flux to the pole piece end closest to the end of said hammer from a pole piece intermediate the end of said hammer and a mounting of said hammer.
  • 34. The method as claimed in claim 33 further comprising:providing a hammer with an enlarged head.
  • 35. The method as claimed in claim 33 further comprising:mounting said extensions on a magnetically conductive member; placing a cover over said hammer and said extensions; and, conducting flux from said pole pieces in part through said magnetically conductive member.
  • 36. The method of claim 31, wherein the flux travels through the sides of the extensions and the sides of the hammers.
US Referenced Citations (7)
Number Name Date Kind
4258623 Barrus et al. Mar 1981 A
4392423 Nakajima et al. Jul 1983 A
4527469 Wolf et al. Jul 1985 A
4582437 Wang Apr 1986 A
5335999 Farb et al. Aug 1994 A
5595446 Barrus et al. Jan 1997 A
5743665 Ryan et al. Apr 1998 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
The IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin (NN 9405413), Print Hammer Having Improved Magnetic Flux Means, May 1994, vol. No. 37, Issue No. 5, pp. 413-414.*
The IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin (NN 9405463), Magnetic Field Linearization for Print Hammer Assembly, May 1994, vol. No. 37, Issue No. 5, pp. 463-464.