This invention relates to imaging devices that feed variable length media over a paper path longer than the length of some of the media to be fed.
Printing devices utilizing a media tray under the device typically feed the media out of the tray to the rear and around a āCā shaped path to enter the imaging area and exit to the front of the device. This provides a very compact machine. Because of the varying lengths of media fed through such a device, some mechanism must be provided to accommodate the discrepancy between the length of short media and the path length. This conventionally is done by using a relatively large drive roller (or rollers) which move the media toward non-driven idler rollers to maintain contact with the media while it is being fed around the path and into the imaging area.
This invention employs in an intermediate location in the feed path a drive system which has been used successfully as the initial media pick-and-feed system from the tray. That mechanism is an autocompensting system, comprising one or more feed rollers on a swing arm pivoted around a gear train which drives the feed roller. Autocompensating systems are cost-effective and may be moved toward the media for feeding and off the media by reversing the torque to the gear train. An autocompensating system is also used to pick paper from the tray, and both autocompensating systems may be driven from one motor through different drive trains.
The intermediate autocompensating system is moved away from the feed path until media is driven past that system. Then that system is applied to move the media while the tray autocompensating system is not driven.
The details of this invention will be described in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which
Imaging station 7 is located past nip rollers 9a, 9b which grasp paper 5 in the nip of rollers 9a, 9b and move it under printhead 3. Nip rollers 9a, 9b are stopped normally several times to permit printhead 3 to partially image sheet 5 by moving across sheet 5 (in and out of the view of
Nip rollers 9a, 9b push paper through the imaging station 7 where they enter exits rollers 11a, 11b, 11c, and 11d. Although rollers are by far the most common mechanism to transport the imaged sheet 5 out of the printer 1 to the user of the printer 1, virtually any grasping device can be used, such as a belt and pressing device or pneumatic suction device.
The printer of
A C-shaped paper guide 17 is made up of rear guide surface 17a and spaced, generally parallel, front guide surface 17b. Both surfaces have spaced ridges (shown for surface 17b as 17bb in
Pick roller 15a at tray 13 and drive roller 19a combine to move sheets 5 from tray 13 to nip rollers 9a, 9b. Drive roller 19a is effective to move short media into rollers 9a, 9b, when pick roller 15a is no longer in contact with the sheet 5.
Operational control is by electronic data processing apparatus, shown as element C in
Movement of parts in the printer shown in
Similarly, gear 32a meshes with idler gear 40 which meshes with a somewhat larger gear 42. Gear 42 has integral with it a central, smaller gear 42a (best seen in
As is evident from the gears trains, rotation of motor 30 counterclockwise as viewed in
The autocompensating systems 15 and 19 of this embodiment are not novel with respect to their design and function A slip drive closely similar to that employed has been sold in a prior art device of the assignee of this invention. However, that was employed to lift the paper feed autocompensation system off the paper stack after the top sheet is fed a predetermined distance. This invention employs the slip drive with the autocompensating system located in the paper guide 17.
With reference to
Assuming counterclockwise torque to gear 50 and clockwise torque to gear 60, so long as gear 56 of system 15 or gear 66 of system 19 is not rotating, the torque pivots bracket 58 or bracket 68 respectively and the force against a sheet 5 of drive roller 15a and 19a increases toward the maximum pivoting force which can be applied by motor 30. This force is immediately relieved when gear 56 rotates in the case of system 15 and when gear 66 rotated in the case of system 19. Such rotation occurs when a sheet 5 is being moved, and it is the increase in pivot force against the sheet until it is moved which constitutes autocompensating in the systems.
Opposite or no rotation from the feeding rotation of gears 50 and 60 relieve pivoting torque because the direction of pivot is away from the feeding position and therefore the gears 56 and 66 respectively are free to rotate. To prevent such rotation with respect to system 15, gear 50 is driven through a one-way clutch, (not shown), which may be a conventional ball-and-unsymmetrical-notch clutch or other clutch.
This mechanism is a slip drive. As shown in
As shown in
With spring 72 compressed, the turning of gear 66 turns spring 72 and the turning of spring 72 tends to rotate the entire housing 70, since well 74 is integral with housing 70. However, when further rotation is blocked, spring 72 simply slips.
When gear 66 is rotated in the reverse feeding direction, system 19 is moved away from the drive path of guide 17 as shown in
When gear 66 is rotated in the feeding direction, spring 72 adds somewhat to the downward force while slipping.
In operation, under control of controller C, motor 30 is driven to feed a sheet 5 from tray 13 by rotating autocompensating system 15 downward. Autocompensating system 19 is necessarily driven by the slip drive to move away from the paper feed direction. Accordingly, when a sheet 5 is being moved by system 15, system 19 is moved completely out of guide path 17, as shown in
In normal operation, the sheet 5 moves to encounter sensor arm 21 (
System 19 moves sheets 5 until they reach nip roller 9a, 9b and, preferably, become somewhat buckled. The buckling serves to align sheets 5. The remaining imaging operation may be entirely standard.
It will be recognized that this invention can take many mechanical forms, so long as an autocompensating system is used at least at the intermediate drive location.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3937455 | Hauser | Feb 1976 | A |
4834568 | Kagami et al. | May 1989 | A |
4986525 | Takagi et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5120042 | Goto et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123637 | Musaka | Jun 1992 | A |
5645273 | Nakagawa et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6042109 | Klausbruckner | Mar 2000 | A |
6304731 | Able et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6352256 | Hsieh | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375183 | Inoue et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6929261 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7093830 | Kang | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7121546 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20030067108 | Marra et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030202813 | Schoedinger | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040070136 | Chung | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040245704 | Hall et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050275150 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |