The following patent applications are related to the present application and are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety:
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to document printers and, more specifically, to systems and methods that can detect characteristics or content of a printed document and trigger an action in response.
2. Description of the Background Art
Conventional printers receive documents in a variety of formats and print the contents of the documents in accordance with a proper format. For example, a printer enabled to print PostScript documents will correctly interpret Postscript commands within a document so that the document has the appearance expected by its author when it is printed. (Postscript is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated).
Today, as more and more electrical databases and computer networks are interconnected, people often have multiple data systems and destinations in which to store information. For example, a person may receive an email containing information that he wants to retain. The person may want to print some or all of the information. The person may further want to add the information to a database or to send the information to other people or destinations or to add the information to a web page. Currently, the person will need to execute several different software programs and will need to type multiple commands into the programs. He may also need to re-enter the information into one or more programs. This is not efficient and is prone to human error, since human beings occasionally forget to perform one of more of the tasks usually associated with a received document and are also prone to typographical errors.
Some conventional printers incorporate a management function in which the printer monitors its own internal functions and “phones home” for assistance if, for example, its toner is low or it is out of paper. This action is based on the printer doing “self-monitoring,” not on any monitoring of the documents to be printed.
What is needed is a printer and method that can take various actions (in addition to printing) depending on the content and characteristics of a document that is sent to it.
The present invention overcomes the deficiencies and limitations of the prior art by providing a system and method for a printer that can detect characteristics of a printed document and trigger an action in response, in addition to or instead of the action of printing the document. For example, such a printer could extract the fields and values in an electronic form and store that information in a database. This system can also create a paper document that reflects some aspect of the action executed by the printer.
The action is preferably based on content of the document received by the printer. This content can include printable and non-printable data. In certain embodiments, the document is analyzed by a data processing system before it is sent to be printed and additional data is added to or coupled with the document. In one embodiment, an author or other user provides additional information, such as the name of a database. In another embodiment, software on the data processing system analyzes the document and provides additional information about its content, such as the content of certain data fields. In yet another embodiment, the document is analyzed after the printer receives it. In all of these embodiments, the printer performs an action (in addition to or instead of printing) in accordance with the content of the document.
In certain embodiments, the printer and/or an associated printer-side component interact with the user or with the document source before the printer performs the action in accordance with the content of the document.
The invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.
a) is a block diagram showing a system usable in connection with the present invention.
b) is a block diagram showing a system usable in connection with the present invention.
c) is a block diagram showing a system usable in connection with the present invention.
a) shows a first embodiment of the present invention for printing a paper document and additionally performing an action.
b) shows a second embodiment of the present invention for printing a paper document and additionally performing an action.
c) shows a third embodiment of the present invention for printing a paper document and additionally performing an action.
d) shows a fourth embodiment of the present invention for printing a paper document and additionally performing an action.
a) is a flowchart corresponding to an embodiment of
b) is a flowchart corresponding to an embodiment of
c) is a flowchart corresponding to an embodiment of
d) is a flowchart corresponding to an embodiment of
e) is a flowchart corresponding to an embodiment of the present invention.
A method and apparatus for performing at least one action (besides printing) based on the content of a printed document is described. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the invention.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment,” “certain embodiments” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Some portions of the detailed descriptions that follow are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “determining” or “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
The present invention also relates to apparatus for performing the operations herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus.
The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description below. In addition, the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages and Page Description Languages (PDLs) may be used to implement the teachings of the invention as described herein.
Moreover, the present invention is claimed below operating on or working in conjunction with an information system. Such an information system as claimed may be the entire messaging system as detailed below in the preferred embodiment or only portions of such a system. Thus, the present invention is capable of operating with any information system from those with minimal functionality to those providing all the functionality disclosed herein.
b) is a block diagram showing a system usable in connection with the present invention. In this example, document source 102 is connected to printer 106 without a network connection. Similarly, printer 106 is connected to component 108 without a network connection.
c) is a block diagram showing a system usable in connection with the present invention. In this example, printer 106 is connected to component 108 using a network connection through network 104. Network 104 can be any network, such as the Internet, an intranet, a wireless connection, a wide area network, or the like.
It will be understood that the system configurations shown in
In this example, printer 204 communicates with database 208 over a network, although printer 204 could also have a direct connection to database 208. Database 208 can be external or internal to printer 204. In this example, printer 204 includes network interface hardware and software 212 required to communicate over a network. Printer 204 further includes Internet communication software 210 that creates and executes commands to communicate with the database. These commands are, for example, SQL commands, http commands, or similar commands, depending on the nature of database 208.
a)-3(c) show further implementations of a printer that receives a document and performs an action in accordance with content of the document. It will be understood that the components of these figures can be connected with or without a network connection and that any connection method enabling the communication described below falls within the sprit and scope of the present invention.
Author-Provided Data, Application Plug-In, Simple Document Processing by Printer
a) shows a first embodiment of the present invention for printing a paper document 306 and additionally performing an action 308.
Data processing system 302 then sends information to the printer using a format such as Postscript (see 508). This information is termed “Page Description Language” (PDL) because it describes the appearance and characteristics of a document to be printed. In this example, the PDL includes both author provided data (such as an identifier for a database that receives the content of a form) and data derived by application plug-in 325 (such as data extracted by the plug-in from fields in the document). It will be understood that the functionality of plug-in 325 could also be implemented as part of software 324, instead of as a plug-in.
The communication of data to the printer in a way that does not affect the appearance of the printed document described in step (c) above can be done by including the data as a non-printing comment field in the PDL file. This type of non-printing comment is currently allowed in Adobe Postscript or Hewlett-Packard's PCL. Often a long sequence of unlikely characters signals the presence of such data (see “Postscript Language Document Structuring Conventions Specification, Version 3.0,” Sep. 25, 1992, http://partners.adobe.com/asn/developer/pdfs/tn/5001.DSC_Spec.pdf). Using Postscript as an example, in which comments are indicated by two percent signs at the beginning of a line, data fields for a form that indicate the first and last names of an applicant could be indicated as:
a) further shows a printer 304 having document processing software 326. In this example, document processing software 326:
In summary, in the system shown in
In another embodiment, plug-in 325 generates non-printed commands in the print stream in a manner similar to that discussed below in connection with
Yet another embodiment contains either a modified web browser or a web browser with a plug-in in place of document rendering application 324. The modified browser inserts similar commands when HTML forms are printed.
In certain embodiments, the printed document 306 is modified to reflect the results of the action performed by the printer. For example, the document may be modified to contain a watermark that certifies that the data printed on the paper is exactly the same as the data that was uploaded into a database. In certain other embodiments, a certificate to this effect is printed along with the document. In certain other embodiments, an email is sent to the document source, document author, or other indicated party to this effect.
The following paragraphs discuss other implementations of the present invention.
Author-Provided Data, No Application Plug-In, Simple Document Processing by Printer
b) shows a second embodiment of the present invention for printing a paper document and additionally performing an action.
This implementation is useful in systems where data sent to the printer is commonly stored in a print queue. In such systems, the protocol does not allow for user interaction with the printer. Thus, any special communication must be embedded within the data initially sent to the printer. Ideally, the embedded data does not affect the print spooler or other forwarding device, while remaining easy for the printer to detect and parse. As an example, the user inserts the following PostScript metadata into the print stream. Note that this metadata has the format of a non-printing comment.
The above example indicates a document name, e.g., “Special Plate Application” and an email address where notification of printing is to be emailed: hull@rii.ricoh.com.
Document processing software 326 of printer 304 looks for commands within the print stream and processes them. Thus, in the above example, software 326 would send an email message to hull@rii.ricoh.com when this document is printed. Other examples of actions taken by printer 304 in various embodiments include one or more of the following:
c) shows a third embodiment of the present invention for printing a paper document and additionally performing an action.
Another embodiment monitors the user of commercial fonts in printed documents and calculates license fees required by user of the fonts. Data about the license fees are optionally stored in a database or printed or emailed to an appropriate location.
Another embodiment monitors the document for predefined pornographic words (or images, identified by name) and notifies an authority figure if such is found. This embodiment is extremely helpful in monitoring misuse of company resources.
Another embodiment monitors the document for confidential terms such as project names or passwords and notifies an authority figure if such are found in a document to be printed. This embodiment is extremely useful in helping to implement internal security procedures.
The above embodiments provide examples of applying a calculation or analysis to the document received by the printer 304 and performing an action (besides printing) based on the calculation or analysis.
No Author-Provided Data Application Plug-In, Simple Document Processing by Printer
d) shows a fourth embodiment of the present invention for printing a paper document and additionally performing an action.
In certain embodiments, the plug-in detects and sends all form fields in a document. In certain other embodiments, the plug-in searches for certain fields, either in response to user input or because the names of the forms are pre-programmed.
It will be understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art that the processing described above can be performed at various locations within the system. For example, the processing described above in connection with “complex document processing” performed by the printer 304 could also be performed, either totally or partially by data processing system 302. Similarly, processing described as being performed by software on data processing system 302 could be performed by document processing software in printer 304. Similarly, processing could be performed both by the data processing system/document source and by the printer (see, for example, flowchart of
One advantage of using plug-ins in data processing system 302 is that they are easy to add to existing software. In contrast, one advantage of performing most or all processing on the printer side is that printers are easier to maintain and service than user computers. In addition, if a large enterprise is going to purchase special processing software, it is less expensive to purchase software that runs on a small number of printers as opposed to software that runs on each user machine. This is even more important if special purpose hardware (such as a powerful signal processor) is needed to perform the function, because of the expense and difficulty of such installations. Moreover, the work environment of printers is usually better monitored and it is physically easier to maintain security over printers that contain sensitive analysis programs (such as programs that monitor compliance with licensing or seat requirements or with security requirements) than if this analysis software was located in users' computers.
The following paragraphs contain additional examples of “complex processing” by a printer. The printer recognizes a PDL file directly and analyzes the file to detect certain known fields. For example, if the printer will be used to print many Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) forms (i.e., forms having a known format and content), the printer can analyze the printed documents to detect predetermined values such as name, address, etc and construct a database update command. In certain embodiments, the printer asks for user confirmation before updating the database (see following section on interactive printer commands).
In another example, the printer renders the PDL file as an image using, for example the PDL interpreter on the printer, and applies a forms recognition system such as the Ascent Capture package available from Kofax Image Products of Irvine, Calif. Again, in certain embodiments, the printer asks for user confirmation before performing the action.
Interactive Communication with a Printer
In general, conventional printer drivers in modern operating systems are not designed to facilitate interactive information gathering. Because the print job can be redirected to another printer, or the printing protocol does not allow such interactive sessions, the operating system does not encourage interaction with the user. Once initial printer settings are captured, further interactions are generally not allowed in conventional printers. One approach to this problem is to embed metadata into the print stream itself, as noted above. However, it is possible that the printer could need to ask the user for more information, in response to computations made from the data supplied by the user. In addition, the printer itself might delegate some tasks to other application servers, which might in turn need more information from the user. So-called “Web services” or “grid computing” systems are examples of the sort of application server that the printer might trigger.
In order to allow this interaction, without modifying printer driver architecture of the underlying operating system, an extra mechanism, such as the one shown in
Once a print request 402 is sent by user 450 and notification requested from the UI listener 404, the print job is sent by application 452. Here, the print job contains embedded information including the network address of the UI listener, authentication information, and the latest time that the client will be listening for requests.
If the printer requires additional information of confirmation, it sends a request 408, which is detected by the UI listener, which displays a dialog box to obtain input from the user 410. An example of such a request might be a request for a password or user confirmation code that the user must enter to access a database 458. Alternatively, the printer asks for additional information based on computation, such as noting the absence of a required field and asking for a value to be entered before printing. The user's input is included in a reply 412 sent to the printer. If the reply does not satisfy the printer it may ask for additional information (not shown). If the reply does satisfy the printer, it takes a next step. This step might be to perform an action such as sending an email (not shown). The next step might also be sending a request for information 414 to an application server (such as a database) 458. In this example, application server 458 also sends a request for information 416, which is detected by the UI listener. The user is prompted 418 and his response forwarded to the application server 420. In this example, a reply is then sent from the application server 458 to the printer 456. It will be understood that a particular embodiment may include either or none or requests 408 and 416 without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
A program such as that shown in
Because network transactions of this type are prone to many complex error conditions, a system of timeouts would be necessary to assure robust operation. Normally, each message sent across a network either expects a reply or is a one-way message. Messages which expect replies generally have a timeout, a limited period of time during which it is acceptable for the reply to arrive. In this embodiment, embedded metadata would include metadata about a UI listener that will accept requests for further information. Such metadata preferably includes at least a network address, port number, and a timeout period. It might also include authentication information, designed to prevent malicious attempts to elicit information from the user. Because the user cannot tell whether the request is coming from a printer, a delegated server, or a malicious agent, prudence suggests strong authentication by the UI listener. If the printer or a delegated application server wishes more information, it can use the above noted information to request that the UI listener ask a user for the needed information.
While the present invention has been described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that various modifications may be provided. For example, certain embodiments employ multiple application servers, acting in cooperation to perform a function or request. Any of the above functions or requests can be sent across a network, or using local cables such as IEEE1394, Universal Serial Bus, or wireless networks such as IEEE 802.11 or IEEE 802.15 networks, in any combination. Variations upon and modifications to the preferred embodiments are provided for by the present invention, which is limited only by the following claims.
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to: 1) U.S. Provisional patent application entitled “Printer Including One or More Specialized Hardware Devices” filed on Sep. 25, 2003, having Ser. No. 60/506,303, and2) U.S. Provisional patent application entitled “Printer Including Interface and Specialized Information Processing Capabilities” filed on Sep. 25, 2003, having Ser. No. 60/506,302. Both provisional applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4133007 | Wessler et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4205780 | Burns et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4619522 | Imai | Oct 1986 | A |
4635132 | Nakamura | Jan 1987 | A |
4734898 | Morinaga | Mar 1988 | A |
4754485 | Klatt | Jun 1988 | A |
4807186 | Ohnishi et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4831610 | Hoda et al. | May 1989 | A |
4881135 | Heilweil | Nov 1989 | A |
4907973 | Hon | Mar 1990 | A |
4998215 | Black et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5059126 | Kimball | Oct 1991 | A |
5091948 | Kametani | Feb 1992 | A |
5093730 | Ishii et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5115967 | Wedekind | May 1992 | A |
5136563 | Takemasa et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5170935 | Federspiel et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5220649 | Forcier | Jun 1993 | A |
5231698 | Forcier | Jul 1993 | A |
5237648 | Mills et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5270989 | Kimura | Dec 1993 | A |
5343251 | Nafeh | Aug 1994 | A |
5386510 | Jacobs | Jan 1995 | A |
5432532 | Mochimaru et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436792 | Leman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438426 | Miake et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444476 | Conway | Aug 1995 | A |
5479600 | Wroblewski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480306 | Liu | Jan 1996 | A |
5485554 | Lowitz et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5493409 | Maeda et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5568406 | Gerber | Oct 1996 | A |
5572651 | Weber et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576950 | Tonomura et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581366 | Merchant et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590257 | Forcier | Dec 1996 | A |
5596698 | Morgan | Jan 1997 | A |
5617138 | Ito et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624265 | Redford et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627936 | Prasad et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628684 | Bouedec | May 1997 | A |
5633723 | Sugiyama et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640193 | Wellner | Jun 1997 | A |
5661506 | Lazzouni et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661783 | Assis | Aug 1997 | A |
5682330 | Seaman et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682540 | Klotz, Jr. et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690496 | Kennedy | Nov 1997 | A |
5706097 | Schelling et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717841 | Farrell et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721883 | Katsuo et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5729665 | Gauthier | Mar 1998 | A |
5749735 | Redford et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764368 | Shibaki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774260 | Petitto et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5793869 | Claflin, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5804803 | Cragun et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5845144 | Tateyama et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5884056 | Steele | Mar 1999 | A |
5903538 | Fujita et al. | May 1999 | A |
5936542 | Kleinrock et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938727 | Ikeda | Aug 1999 | A |
5940776 | Baron et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941936 | Taylor | Aug 1999 | A |
5945998 | Eick | Aug 1999 | A |
5949879 | Berson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962839 | Eskildsen | Oct 1999 | A |
5974189 | Nicponski | Oct 1999 | A |
5987226 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999173 | Ubillos | Dec 1999 | A |
6000030 | Steinberg et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006241 | Purnaveja et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6020916 | Gerszberg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038567 | Young | Mar 2000 | A |
6043904 | Nickerson | Mar 2000 | A |
6076733 | Wilz, Sr. et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076734 | Dougherty et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081261 | Wolff et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098106 | Philyaw et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106457 | Perkins et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108656 | Durst et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111567 | Savchenko et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115718 | Huberman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118888 | Chino et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123258 | Iida | Sep 2000 | A |
6125229 | Dimitrova et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138151 | Reber et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148094 | Kinsella | Nov 2000 | A |
6152369 | Wilz, Sr. et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153667 | Howald | Nov 2000 | A |
6167033 | Chang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170007 | Venkatraman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175489 | Markow et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189009 | Stratigos et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193658 | Wendelken et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199042 | Kurzweil | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6256638 | Dougherty et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296693 | McCarthy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297812 | Ohara et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297851 | Taubman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298145 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302527 | Walker | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307956 | Black | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308887 | Korman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330976 | Dymetman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6360057 | Tsumagari et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369811 | Graham et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373498 | Abgrall | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373585 | Mastie et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375298 | Purcell et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6378070 | Chan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6417435 | Chantzis et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6421738 | Ratan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439465 | Bloomberg | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442336 | Lemelson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452615 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466534 | Cundiff, Sr. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6476793 | Motoyama et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476834 | Doval et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502114 | Forcier | Dec 2002 | B1 |
D468277 | Sugiyama | Jan 2003 | S |
6502756 | Fåhraeus | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6504620 | Kinjo | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515756 | Mastie et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519360 | Tanaka | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529920 | Arons et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535639 | Uchihachi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544294 | Greenfield et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552743 | Rissman | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556241 | Yoshimura et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6568595 | Russell et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6581070 | Gibbon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587859 | Dougherty et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6593860 | Lai et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594377 | Kim et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611276 | Muratori et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611622 | Krumm | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611628 | Sekiguchi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625334 | Shiota et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6647534 | Graham | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647535 | Bozdagi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654887 | Rhoads | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665092 | Reed | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674538 | Takahashi | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678389 | Sun et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687383 | Kanevsky et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700566 | Shimoosawa et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6701369 | Philyaw | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724494 | Danknick | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728466 | Tanaka | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6745234 | Philyaw et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6750978 | Marggraff et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753883 | Schena et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6771283 | Carro | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6772947 | Shaw | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6774951 | Narushima | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6775651 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6807303 | Kim et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6824044 | Lapstun et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6845913 | Madding et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853980 | Ying et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856415 | Simchik et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6871780 | Nygren et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877134 | Fuller et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6883162 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886750 | Rathus et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6892193 | Bolle et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898709 | Teppler | May 2005 | B1 |
6904168 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6923721 | Luciano et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931594 | Jun | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938202 | Matsubayashi et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6946672 | Lapstun et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950623 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964374 | Djuknic et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6966495 | Lynggaard et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983482 | Morita et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000193 | Impink, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7023459 | Arndt et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031965 | Moriya et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7075676 | Owen | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079278 | Sato | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089420 | Durst et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7092568 | Eaton | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7131058 | Lapstun | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7134016 | Harris | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149957 | Hull et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151613 | Ito | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152206 | Tsuruta | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7162690 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174151 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181502 | Incertis | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7196808 | Kofman et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7215436 | Hull et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228492 | Graham | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7263659 | Hull et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263671 | Hull et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280738 | Kauffman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298512 | Reese et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20010003846 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010017714 | Komatsu et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010037408 | Thrift et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052942 | MacCollum et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001101 | Hamura et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004807 | Graham et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006100 | Cundiff, Sr. et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010641 | Stevens et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011518 | Goetz et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015066 | Siwinski et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023957 | Michaelis et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020048224 | Dygert et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020051010 | Jun et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020060748 | Aratani et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066782 | Swaminathan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020067503 | Hiatt | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087598 | Carro | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099534 | Hegarty | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101513 | Halverson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131071 | Parry | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020134699 | Bradfield et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135800 | Dutta | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020137544 | Myojo | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140993 | Silverbrook | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159637 | Echigo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165769 | Ogaki et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169849 | Schroath | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171857 | Hisatomi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020185533 | Shieh et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199149 | Nagasaki et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002068 | Constantin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007776 | Kameyama et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014615 | Lynggaard | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024975 | Rajasekharan | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030025951 | Pollard et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038971 | Renda | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051214 | Graham et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065925 | Shindo et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076521 | Li et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084462 | Kubota et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088582 | Pflug | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093384 | Durst et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110926 | Sitrick et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117652 | Lapstun | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121006 | Tabata et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128877 | Nicponski | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030160898 | Baek et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177240 | Gulko et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187642 | Ponceleon et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220988 | Hymel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231198 | Janevski | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024643 | Pollock et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036842 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039723 | Lee et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044894 | Lofgren et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049681 | Diehl et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040118908 | Ando et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125402 | Kanai et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128514 | Rhoads | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128613 | Sinisi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143459 | Engelson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143602 | Ruiz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156616 | Strub et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167895 | Carro | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184064 | TaKeda et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207876 | Aschenbrenner et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215470 | Bodin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229195 | Marggraff et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240541 | Chadwick et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249650 | Freedman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038794 | Piersol | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050064935 | Blanco | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083413 | Reed et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050149849 | Graham et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050213153 | Hull et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216838 | Graham | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216852 | Hull et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060043193 | Brock | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060136343 | Coley et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060171559 | Rhoads | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070033419 | Kocher et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070065094 | Chien et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070268164 | Lai et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080037043 | Hull et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2386829 | Nov 2002 | CA |
1352765 | Jun 2002 | CN |
1097394 | Dec 2002 | CN |
1133170 | Sep 2001 | EP |
WO 9918523 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 02082316 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050068569 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60506303 | Sep 2003 | US | |
60506302 | Sep 2003 | US |