Reference is made to commonly-assigned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/792,329, entitled “PRINTHEAD INCLUDING COANDA CATCHER WITH GROOVED RADIUS”, Ser. No. 13/792,338, entitled “PRINTHEAD INCLUDING COANDA CATCHER WITH GROOVED RADIUS”, Ser. No. 13/792,358, entitled “PRINTHEAD INCLUDING COANDA CATCHER WITH GROOVED RADIUS”, all filed concurrently herewith.
This invention relates generally to the field of digitally controlled printing devices, and in particular to catchers of continuous liquid jetting systems.
Traditionally, inkjet printing is accomplished by one of two technologies referred to as “drop-on-demand” and “continuous” printing. In both, liquid, such as ink, is fed through channels formed in a print head. Each channel includes a nozzle from which droplets are selectively extruded and deposited upon a recording surface.
Continuous liquid printing uses a pressurized liquid source that produces a stream of drops some of which are selected to contact a print media while other are selected to be collected and either recycled or discarded. For example, when no print is desired, the drops (commonly referred to as non-print drops) are deflected into a capturing mechanism (commonly referred to as a catcher, interceptor, or gutter) and either recycled or discarded. When printing is desired, the drops (commonly referred to as print drops) are not deflected and allowed to strike a print media. Alternatively, deflected drops can be allowed to strike the print media, while non-deflected drops are collected in the capturing mechanism.
After the non-print liquid drop contacts the catcher, it flows down the catcher face. Drag causes the liquid to slow down which can cause the liquid layer (also referred to as a liquid film) to become thicker. Increasing the thickness of the liquid film reduces the clearance between the liquid film and the print drops. If there is insufficient clearance between the liquid film and the print drops, the ink film can contact the print drops resulting in print defects.
As such, there is an ongoing effort to improve catcher performance in continuous printing systems.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a printhead includes a jetting module, a deflection mechanism, and a catcher. The jetting module includes a linear array of nozzles extending in a direction along a length of the jetting module with the linear array of nozzles having a pitch. The jetting module is configured to form liquid drops travelling along a first path from a plurality of liquid jets emitted from the nozzles. The deflection mechanism is configured to cause selected liquid drops formed by the jetting module to deviate from the first path and begin travelling along a second path. The catcher is positioned to intercept liquid drops travelling along one of the first path and the second path. The catcher includes a drop contact surface and a liquid removal conduit connected in fluid communication with each other by a Coanda surface including a radial surface including an array of grooves. The liquid removal conduit includes a surface that is positioned opposite and spaced apart from the radial surface that includes the array of grooves such that the opposite surface of the liquid removal conduit does not contact the radial surface that includes the array of grooves.
In the detailed description of the example embodiments of the invention presented below, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present description will be directed in particular to elements forming part of, or cooperating more directly with, apparatus in accordance with the present invention. It is to be understood that elements not specifically shown or described may take various forms well known to those skilled in the art. In the following description and drawings, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements.
The example embodiments of the present invention are illustrated schematically and not to scale for the sake of clarity. One of the ordinary skills in the art will be able to readily determine the specific size and interconnections of the elements of the example embodiments of the present invention.
As described herein, the example embodiments of the present invention provide a printhead or printhead components typically used inkjet printing systems. However, many other applications are emerging which use inkjet printheads to emit liquids (other than inks) that need to be finely metered and deposited with high spatial precision. As such, as described herein, the terms “liquid” and “ink” refer to any material that can be ejected by the printhead or printhead components described below.
Referring to
Recording medium 32 is moved relative to printhead 30 by a recording medium transport system 34, which is electronically controlled by a recording medium transport control system 36, and which in turn is controlled by a micro-controller 38. The recording medium transport system shown in
Ink is contained in an ink reservoir 40 under pressure. In the non-printing state, continuous ink jet drop streams are unable to reach recording medium 32 due to an ink catcher 42 that blocks the stream and which may allow a portion of the ink to be recycled by an ink recycling unit 44. The ink recycling unit reconditions the ink and feeds it back to reservoir 40. Such ink recycling units are well known in the art. The ink pressure suitable for optimal operation will depend on a number of factors, including geometry and thermal properties of the nozzles and thermal properties of the ink. A constant ink pressure can be achieved by applying pressure to ink reservoir 40 under the control of ink pressure regulator 46.
The ink is distributed to printhead 30 through an ink channel 47. The ink preferably flows through slots or holes etched through a silicon substrate of printhead 30 to its front surface, where a plurality of nozzles and drop forming mechanisms, for example, heaters, are situated. When printhead 30 is fabricated from silicon, drop forming mechanism control circuits 26 can be integrated with the printhead. Printhead 30 also includes a deflection mechanism (not shown in
Referring to
Liquid, for example, ink, is emitted under pressure through each nozzle 50 of the array to form filaments of liquid 52. In
Jetting module 48 is operable to form liquid drops having a first size and liquid drops having a second size through each nozzle. To accomplish this, jetting module 48 includes a drop stimulation or drop forming device 28, for example, a heater or a piezoelectric actuator, that, when selectively activated, perturbs each filament of liquid 52, for example, ink, to induce portions of each filament to breakoff from the filament and coalesce to form drops 54, 56.
In
Typically, one drop forming device 28 is associated with each nozzle 50 of the nozzle array. However, a drop forming device 28 can be associated with groups of nozzles 50 or all of nozzles 50 of the nozzle array.
When printhead 30 is in operation, drops 54, 56 are typically created in a plurality of sizes, for example, in the form of large drops 56, a first size, and small drops 54, a second size. The ratio of the mass of the large drops 56 to the mass of the small drops 54 is typically approximately an integer between 2 and 10. A drop stream 58 including drops 54, 56 follows a drop path or trajectory 57.
Printhead 30 also includes a gas flow deflection mechanism 60 that directs a flow of gas 62, for example, air, past a portion of the drop trajectory 57. This portion of the drop trajectory is called the deflection zone 64. As the flow of gas 62 interacts with drops 54, 56 in deflection zone 64 it alters the drop trajectories. As the drop trajectories pass out of the deflection zone 64 they are traveling at an angle, called a deflection angle, relative to the undeflected drop trajectory 57.
Small drops 54 are more affected by the flow of gas than are large drops 56 so that the small drop trajectory 66 diverges from the large drop trajectory 68. That is, the deflection angle for small drops 54 is larger than for large drops 56. The flow of gas 62 provides sufficient drop deflection and therefore sufficient divergence of the small and large drop trajectories so that catcher 42 (shown in
When catcher 42 is positioned to intercept large drop trajectory 68, small drops 54 are deflected sufficiently to avoid contact with catcher 42 and strike the print media. As the small drops are printed, this is called small drop print mode. When catcher 42 is positioned to intercept small drop trajectory 66, large drops 56 are the drops that print. This is referred to as large drop print mode.
Referring to
Drop stimulation or drop forming device 28 (shown in
Positive pressure gas flow structure 61 of gas flow deflection mechanism 60 is located on a first side of drop trajectory 57. Positive pressure gas flow structure 61 includes first gas flow duct 72 that includes a lower wall 74 and an upper wall 76. Gas flow duct 72 directs gas supplied from a positive pressure source 92 at downward angle θ of approximately a 45° toward drop deflection zone 64. An optional seal(s) 84 provides an air seal between jetting module 48 and upper wall 76 of gas flow duct 72.
Upper wall 76 of gas flow duct 72 does not need to extend to drop deflection zone 64 (as shown in
Negative pressure gas flow structure 63 of gas flow deflection mechanism 60 is located on a second side of drop trajectory 57. Negative pressure gas flow structure includes a second gas flow duct 78 located between catcher 42 and an upper wall 82 that exhausts gas flow from deflection zone 64. Second duct 78 is connected to a negative pressure source 94 that is used to help remove gas flowing through second duct 78. An optional seal(s) 84 provides an air seal between jetting module 48 and upper wall 82.
As shown in
Gas supplied by first gas flow duct 72 is directed into the drop deflection zone 64, where it causes large drops 56 to follow large drop trajectory 68 and small drops 54 to follow small drop trajectory 66. As shown in
The present invention is not limited to use with the specific drop deflection mechanism or drop forming mechanism described above. For example, an electrostatic deflection mechanism can be used in place of a gas flow deflection mechanism, and a piezoelectric drop forming device can be used in place of a thermal drop forming device. The particular drop deflection or drop forming mechanisms selected depend on the specific application contemplated.
Referring to
As the ink flows down the catcher face 90, drag causes the liquid to slow down, which causes the layer of ink to become thicker. Increasing the thickness 102 of the ink film 98 reduces the clearance between the ink film 98 and the print drops 56. If there is insufficient clearance between the ink film 98 and the print drops 56, the ink film can contact the print drops causing these print drops to be either captured by the ink film on the catcher or deflected sufficiently that they fail to strike the recording media 32 at the desired location. This print defect is commonly referred to as a pickout print defect.
It has been found that the ink film thickness can be reduced by lowering the impact height 114 of the non-print drops 54 on the front face 90 of the catcher. This is due to the reduced distance that the ink film travels on the front face of the catcher, and over which drag can slow down the ink film, before the liquid travels around the radial surface of the Coanda surface of the catcher to enter the liquid return duct. As a result, there is typically an upper impact height threshold 142 above which pickout print defects are seen as a result of the insufficient clearance between the ink film 98 and the print drops 56. Below the upper impact height threshold 142, the reduced ink film thickness 102 provides sufficient clearance between the print drops 56 and the ink film 98 so that the pickout print defect is eliminated.
Conventional techniques, see, for example, EP 1 013 425, have reduced the fluid drag by heating the ink to lower its viscosity. Polishing or buffing the catcher face also reduces the fluid drag on the catcher face. While these methods reduce the fluid drag, the reduction in fluid drag is not sufficient for some printing applications, especially those involving high viscosity inks or smaller drop sizes.
It has also been found that too low of an impact height of the non-print drops on the front face 90 also leads to a print defect, commonly referred to as dark defect. This defect is the result of the non-print drops striking the front face of the catcher. It is thought that the ink film still has sufficient momentum at least locally such that the ink doesn't stay attached to the catcher face as it rounds the radial surface 100 of the catcher. Some of the ink then slings off the radial surface of the catcher and strikes the recording media 32. Since extra ink strikes the recording media in this situation, this print defect is known as dark defect. The impact height below which dark defect occurs is the lower impact height threshold 140.
Good quality print requires the drop impact height 114 to be lower than the upper impact height threshold 142 and above the lower impact height threshold 140. Ideally, there is a large operating window between the upper impact height threshold and the lower impact height threshold. Typically, the operating window between the onsets of the two types of print defects described above is measured in terms of a control parameter of the drop deflection system. For example, the print window can be measured in terms of the difference in gas flow rates for the drop deflection gas flow between the flow rate below which dark defect occurs and the flow rate above which the pickout defect. Unfortunately, the print or operating window tends to shrink when higher the viscosity inks are used.
The present invention helps increase the print window. It does this by altering the geometry of the catcher 42 in the vicinity of the radial surface of the catcher.
The design of prior art catchers was such that the ink flowed as individual rivulets in each of the grooves, with the land area between the grooves separating the ink rivulets. With the catcher of the present invention, the land area 128 between the grooves no longer separates the flow of ink into the liquid return channel into individual rivulets. With the groove structure of the present catcher, a portion of the ink striking the front face 90 of the catcher 42 flows through the grooves 108 to the lower face 144 of the catcher and the liquid return duct 86, while the remainder of the ink flows down the front face, around the radial surface 100 of the Coanda surface to the lower face 144 of the catcher and the liquid return channel 86. The ink from the group of nozzles 152, which align with the groove 108, will flow through the groove to the lower face of the catcher, while the ink from the group of nozzles 154, which align with the land area 116 between the grooves, will flow along the radial surface 100 to the lower face 144 of the catcher.
In prior art catchers where the grooves served to separate the liquid flow into separate rivulets, the grooves were cut with a uniform depths as they wrapped from the front face of the catcher around the radial surface of the Coanda surface and into the liquid return channel, so that the grooves followed the contour of the outer surface of the catcher. In contrast to the prior art, the grooves of the invention don't follow the contour of the outer face of the catcher, but rather vary in depth 112 along the length of the groove. The depth 112 of a groove varies along the radial surface as viewed relative to the drop contact surface and the surface of the liquid removal conduit that is adjacent to the Coanda surface. As seen in
In the embodiment shown in
Preferably, the front of each groove intersects the Coanda surface of the catcher approximately at the tangent point 150 of the radial surface, where the radial surface meets the straight portion of the Coanda surface on the front of the catcher. Alternatively, the front of each groove intersects the radial surface 100 of the Coanda surface slightly below the tangent point.
Referring back to
While the profile of the top 110 of the grooves shown in
The liquid flow down the front face and the radial surface of the catcher at each end of the jet array can differ slightly from the liquid flow away from the ends of the array. To accommodate such variations in flow near the ends of the jet array, the pitch or spacing of the grooves can vary along the length of the array. As shown in
While not being limited to a particular understanding of the fluid flow on the catcher, it is thought that the grooves in the radial surface of the catcher enhance the print window by providing a significant increase in the depth of the liquid film which can more readily accommodate the slowing ink film. The liquid flow over the land area between the grooves seems to provide an anchor point for the liquid in the grooves which inhibits the detachment of the ink film that would otherwise occur at an abrupt transition between the front face of the catcher and a transition surface to the liquid return channel, such as the abrupt transition from the front face of the catcher to the top surface of the grooves.
The catcher with the array of grooves intersecting the radial surface of the Coanda surface of the catcher with the spacing and the width of the grooves being larger than the nozzle spacing has been found to enhance the operating window of the printhead. Relative to a conventional Coanda catcher that lacks the grooves, the present grooved catcher provides enhanced print windows for inks have viscosities greater than 2 cP, and more enhanced print windows yet for inks having viscosities of greater than 4 cP.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3813675 | Steffy et al. | May 1974 | A |
3836914 | Duffield | Sep 1974 | A |
3936135 | Duffield | Feb 1976 | A |
4460903 | Guenther et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4667207 | Sutera et al. | May 1987 | A |
5105205 | Fagerquist | Apr 1992 | A |
6457807 | Hawkins et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481835 | Hawkins et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491362 | Jeanmaire | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505921 | Chwalek et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6554410 | Jeanmaire et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6575566 | Jeanmaire et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6588888 | Jeanmaire et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6648461 | Long | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6793328 | Jeanmaire | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6827429 | Jeanmaire et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6851796 | Jeanmaire et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20080284835 | Panchawagh et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 013 425 | Jun 2000 | EP |