Reference is made to commonly-assigned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/767,824, entitled “PRINTHEAD INCLUDING FILTER ASSOCIATED WITH EACH NOZZLE”, Ser. No. 12/767,826, entitled “CONTINUOUS PRINTHEAD INCLUDING POLYMERIC FILTER”, Ser. No. 12/767,828, entitled “METHOD OF MANUFACTURING PRINTHEAD INCLUDING POLYMERIC FILTER”, Ser. No. 12/767,827, entitled “PRINTHEAD INCLUDING POLYMERIC FILTER”, all filed concurrently herewith.
This invention relates generally to the field of digitally controlled printing systems and, in particular, to the filtering of liquids that are subsequently emitted by a printhead of the printing system.
The use of inkjet printers for printing information on recording media is well established. Printers employed for this purpose can include continuous printing systems which emit a continuous stream of drops from which specific drops are selected for printing in accordance with print data. Other printers can include drop-on-demand printing systems that selectively form and emit printing drops only when specifically required by print data information.
Continuous printer systems typically include a printhead that incorporates a liquid supply system and a nozzle plate having a plurality of nozzles fed by the liquid supply system. The liquid supply system provides the liquid to the nozzles with a pressure sufficient to jet an individual stream of the liquid from each of the nozzles. The fluid pressures from the liquid supply required to form the liquid jets in a continuous inkjet are typically much greater than the fluid pressures from the liquid supply employed in drop-on-demand printer systems.
Different methods known in the art have been used to produce various components within a printer system. Some techniques that have been employed to form micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) have also been employed to form various printhead components. MEMS processes typically include modified semiconductor device fabrication technologies. Various MEMS processes typically combine photo-imaging techniques with etching techniques to form various features in a substrate. The photo-imaging techniques are employed to define regions of a substrate that are to be preferentially etched from other regions of the substrate that should not be etched. MEMS processes can be applied to single layer substrates or to substrates made up of multiple layers of materials having different material properties. MEMS processes have been employed to produce nozzle plates along with other printhead structures such as ink feed channels, ink reservoirs, electrical conductors, electrodes and various insulator and dielectric components.
Particulate contamination in a printing system can adversely affect quality and performance, especially in printing systems that include printheads with small diameter nozzles. Particulates present in the liquid can either cause a complete blockage or partial blockage in one or more nozzles. Some blockages reduce or even prevent liquid from being emitted from printhead nozzles while other blockages can cause a stream of liquid jetted from printhead nozzles to be randomly directed away from its desired trajectory. Regardless of the type of blockage, nozzle blockage is deleterious to high quality printing and can adversely affect printhead reliability. This becomes even more important when using a page wide printing system that accomplishes printing in a single pass. During a single pass printing operation, usually all of the printing nozzles of a printhead are operational in order to achieve a desired image quality and ink coverage on the receiving media. As the printing system has only one opportunity to print a given section of media, image artifacts can result when one or more nozzles are blocked or otherwise not working properly.
Conventional printheads have included one or more filters positioned at various locations in the fluid path to reduce problems associated with particulate contamination. Even so, there is an ongoing need to reduce particulate contamination in printheads and printing systems and an ongoing need for printhead filters that provide adequate filtration with acceptable levels of pressure loss across the filter. There is also an ongoing need for effective and practical methods for forming printhead filters using MEMS fabrication techniques.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a printhead includes a nozzle plate, a filter, and a plurality of walls. Portions of the nozzle plate define a plurality of nozzles. The filter, for example, a filter membrane, includes a plurality of pores grouped in a plurality of pore clusters. Each of the plurality of walls extends from the nozzle plate to the filter membrane to define a plurality of liquid chambers positioned between the nozzle plate and the filter membrane. Each liquid chamber of the plurality of liquid chambers is in fluid communication with a respective one of the plurality of nozzles. Each liquid chamber of the plurality of liquid chambers is in fluid communication with the plurality of pores of a respective one of the plurality of pore clusters. The respective one of the plurality of pore clusters includes two pore sub-clusters spaced apart from each other by a non-porous portion of the filter membrane.
According to another aspect of the invention, the printhead can include a liquid source that is in liquid communication with each nozzle of the plurality of nozzles through each liquid chamber and the respective one of the plurality of pore clusters associated with each liquid chamber. The liquid source is configured to provide liquid under pressure sufficient to eject a jet of liquid through each nozzle.
In the detailed description of the example embodiments of the invention presented below, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present description will be directed in particular to elements forming part of, or cooperating more directly with, apparatus in accordance with the present invention. It is to be understood that elements not specifically shown or described may take various forms well known to those skilled in the art. In the following description and drawings, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements.
The example embodiments of the present invention are illustrated schematically and not to scale for the sake of clarity. One of the ordinary skills in the art will be able to readily determine the specific size and interconnections of the elements of the example embodiments of the present invention.
As described herein, the example embodiments of the present invention provide a printhead or printhead components typically used in inkjet printing systems. However, many other applications are emerging which use inkjet printheads to emit liquids (other than inks) that need to be finely metered and deposited with high spatial precision. As such, as described herein, the terms “liquid” and “ink” refer to any material that can be ejected by the printhead or printhead components described below.
Referring to
Referring to
Recording medium 32 is moved relative to printhead 30 by a recording medium transfer system 34, which is electronically controlled by a recording medium transfer control system 36, and which in turn is controlled by a micro-controller 38. The recording medium transfer system 34 shown in
Ink is contained in an ink reservoir 40 under pressure. Unlike drop-on-demand printheads, a continuous flow of liquid 52 is provided through printhead 30, the continuous flow of liquid 52 having pressure sufficient to form the continuous jets of liquid 52 from which continuous inkjet drop streams are formed. In the non-printing state, the continuous inkjet drop streams are unable to reach recording medium 32 due to an ink catcher 42 that blocks the stream and which may allow a portion of the ink to be recycled by an ink recycling unit 44. The ink recycling unit reconditions the ink and feeds it back to reservoir 40. Such ink recycling units are well known in the art. The ink pressure suitable for optimal operation will depend on a number of factors, including geometry and thermal properties of the nozzles and thermal properties of the ink. A constant ink pressure can be achieved by applying pressure to ink reservoir 40 under the control of ink pressure regulator 46. Alternatively, the ink reservoir can be left unpressurized, or even under a reduced pressure (vacuum), and a pump is employed to deliver ink from the ink reservoir under pressure to the printhead 30. In such an embodiment, the ink pressure regulator 46 can include an ink pump control system. As shown in
The ink is distributed to printhead 30 through an ink channel 47. The ink preferably flows through slots or holes etched through a silicon substrate of printhead 30 to its front surface, where a plurality of nozzles and drop forming mechanisms, for example, heaters, are situated. When printhead 30 is fabricated from silicon, drop forming mechanism control circuits 26 can be integrated with the printhead. Printhead 30 also includes a deflection mechanism which is described in more detail below with reference to
Referring to
Liquid 52, for example, ink, is emitted under pressure through each nozzle 50 of the array to form streams, also commonly referred to as jets, of liquid 52. In
Jetting module 48 is operable to form liquid drops having a first size or volume and liquid drops having a second size or volume through each nozzle. To accomplish this, jetting module 48 includes a drop stimulation or drop forming device 28, for example, a heater or a piezoelectric actuator, that, when selectively activated, perturbs each stream or jet of liquid 52, for example, ink, to induce portions of each stream to break-off from the stream and coalesce to form drops 54, 56.
In
Typically, one drop forming device 28 is associated with each nozzle 50 of the nozzle array. However, a drop forming device 28 can be associated with groups of nozzles 50 or all of nozzles 50 of the nozzle array.
When printhead 30 is in operation, drops 54, 56 are typically created in a plurality of sizes or volumes, for example, in the form of large drops 56 having a first size or volume, and small drops 54 having a second size or volume. The ratio of the mass of the large drops 56 to the mass of the small drops 54 is typically approximately an integer between 2 and 10. A drop stream 58 including drops 54, 56 follows a drop path or trajectory 57.
Printhead 30 also includes a gas flow deflection mechanism 60 that directs a flow of gas 62, for example, air, past a portion of the drop trajectory 57. This portion of the drop trajectory is called the deflection zone 64. As the flow of gas 62 interacts with drops 54, 56 in deflection zone 64, it alters the drop trajectories. As the drop trajectories pass out of the deflection zone 64 they are traveling at an angle, called a deflection angle, relative to the un-deflected drop trajectory 57.
Small drops 54 are more affected by the flow of gas than are large drops 56 so that the small drop trajectory 66 diverges from the large drop trajectory 68. That is, the deflection angle for small drops 54 is larger than for large drops 56. The flow of gas 62 provides sufficient drop deflection and therefore sufficient divergence of the small and large drop trajectories so that catcher 42 (shown in
When catcher 42 is positioned to intercept large drop trajectory 68, small drops 54 are deflected sufficiently to avoid contact with catcher 42 and strike the print recording medium 32. As the small drops are printed, this is called small drop print mode. When catcher 42 is positioned to intercept small drop trajectory 66, large drops 56 are the drops that print. This is referred to as large drop print mode.
Referring to
Drop stimulation or drop forming device 28 (shown in
Positive pressure gas flow structure 61 of gas flow deflection mechanism 60 is located on a first side of drop trajectory 57. Positive pressure gas flow structure 61 includes first gas flow duct 72 that includes a lower wall 74 and an upper wall 76. Gas flow duct 72 directs gas flow 62 supplied from a positive pressure source 92 at downward angle θ of approximately a 45° relative to the stream of liquid 52 toward drop deflection zone 64 (also shown in
Upper wall 76 of gas flow duct 72 does not need to extend to drop deflection zone 64 (as shown in
Negative pressure gas flow structure 63 of gas flow deflection mechanism 60 is located on a second side of drop trajectory 57. Negative pressure gas flow structure includes a second gas flow duct 78 located between catcher 42 and an upper wall 82 that exhausts gas flow from deflection zone 64. Second duct 78 is connected to a negative pressure source 94 that is used to help remove gas flowing through second duct 78. Optional seal(s) 84 provides an air seal between jetting module 48 and upper wall 82.
As shown in
Gas supplied by first gas flow duct 72 is directed into the drop deflection zone 64, where it causes large drops 56 to follow large drop trajectory 68 and small drops 54 to follow small drop trajectory 66. As shown in
Alternatively, deflection can be accomplished by applying heat asymmetrically to stream of liquid 52 using an asymmetric heater 51. When used in this capacity, asymmetric heater 51 typically operates as the drop forming mechanism in addition to the deflection mechanism. This type of drop formation and deflection is known having been described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,079,821, issued to Chwalek et al., on Jun. 27, 2000. It is understood that these deflections are purposely created and are different than undesired deflections created by particulate contamination of a printhead filter.
Alternatively, deflection can be accomplished by applying heat asymmetrically to filament of liquid 52 using an asymmetric heater 51. When used in this capacity, asymmetric heater 51 typically operates as the drop forming mechanism in addition to the deflection mechanism. This type of drop formation and deflection is known having been described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,079,821, issued to Chwalek et al., on Jun. 27, 2000.
Deflection can also be accomplished using an electrostatic deflection mechanism. Typically, the electrostatic deflection mechanism either incorporates drop charging and drop deflection in a single electrode, like the one described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,808, or includes separate drop charging and drop deflection electrodes.
As shown in
Nozzle plate 49 is formed from a substrate 85, various portions of substrate 85 defining a plurality of nozzles 50. For clarity, only four (4) nozzles 50 are shown. It is understood that other suitable numbers of nozzles 50 can be employed in other example embodiments.
Jetting module 48 includes a filter adapted for filtering particulate matter from the continuous flow of liquid 52. In particular, jetting module 48 includes filter membrane 100. Filter membrane 100 is adapted for filtering portions of the continuous flow of liquid 52 that is provided by channel 47. Filter membrane 100 includes a plurality of pores 110 adapted for filtering particulate matter in the continuous flow of liquid 52.
Jetting module 48 includes a plurality of liquid chambers 53, each of the liquid chambers 53 providing a portion of liquid 52 to a respective one of nozzles 50. In this example embodiment, filter membrane 100 is separated from nozzles 50 by the plurality of liquid chambers 53. The liquid chambers 53 provide for fluid communication between nozzles 50 and pores 110. Each liquid chamber 53 can be positioned for fluid communication with a different one of the plurality of nozzles 50.
In this example embodiment, each liquid chamber 53 is positioned for fluid communication with a single different one of the nozzles 50. Each liquid chamber 53 is defined by a walled enclosure at leas partially defines by wall(s) 55. Each wall 55 extends from nozzle plate 49 to filter membrane 100 and helps define liquid chambers 53 that are positioned between nozzle plate 49 and filter membrane 100. In addition to being in fluid communication with a respective one of the plurality of nozzles 50, each liquid chamber 53 of the plurality of liquid chambers 53 is in fluid communication with a plurality of pores 110 of a respective one of the plurality of pore clusters 120, described in more detail below, of filter membrane 100.
Each of the walled enclosures can take various forms including walled enclosures that define circular, rectangular and elliptical spaces. Liquid chambers 53 of the present invention can provide various benefits. For example, liquid chambers 53 can be employed to reduce acoustical crosstalk between nozzles 50. The walled enclosures employed to define liquid chambers 53 can be used to provide structural support for various printhead components. Added structural support may be required to withstand the rigors of a manufacturing process by way of non-limiting example.
Referring additionally to
Pores 110 in each pore cluster 120 are regularly arranged. As shown in
The number and size of the pores 110 employed in each pore cluster 120 can vary in various embodiments of the invention. Typically, each of the pore clusters 120 includes a sufficient number of pores 110 to allow a small number of pores in the pore cluster to become obstructed during filtering without adversely affecting the flow of liquid from the nozzle 50. The number of pores 110 employed can be tailored to account for the flow impedance through the pores 110 and therefore the pressure drop across the thermal stimulation membrane 100 even if a small number of pores in the pore cluster become obstructed. A suitable number of the pores 110 can be determined on the basis of a measured or predicted quantity of particulates in liquid 52. Pressure drops will arise as the continuous flow of liquid 52 flows through the pores 110 of filter membrane 100. It is desired that these pressure drops be reduced as much a possible. Factors including the number and size of the pores 110 employed, the number of pores 110 that are expected to be obstructed during filtering, and the thickness of filter membrane 110 can have a bearing on the pressure drops that are encountered during the operation of printhead 30. In some example embodiments, a size of the pores 110 when viewed in a plane perpendicular to a direction of the path of the continuous flow of the liquid 52 through each pore 110 in a sub-cluster 125 is selected so that a pressure drop through the pores 110 of the sub-cluster 125 is less than ⅕th of a pressure drop through an associated nozzle 50. In some example embodiments, a thickness of filter membrane 100 is selected so that a pressure drop through the pores 110 of a sub-cluster 125 is less than ⅕th of a pressure drop through an associated nozzle 50.
A degree to which a jet of liquid 52 that is emitted from a nozzle 50 maintains a desired orientation is typically referred to as “jet straightness”. Jet straightness is of paramount importance as it pertains to the quality of images produced by continuous inkjet printing systems. In some cases, a jet deflection no greater than 0.50 degrees is preferred. In other cases, a jet deflection no greater than 0.25 degrees is preferred. In yet other cases, a jet deflection no greater than 0.05 degrees or less is most preferred. Various factors can cause undesired jet deflections deviations from a desired jet straightness requirement. For example, an obstruction of the various pores 110 of filter membrane 100 can lead to undesired deflections in the jets of liquid 52 that are emitted from various ones of the nozzles 50. It has been determined that the separation between filter membrane 100 and nozzle plate 49 can have a significant effect on jet straightness when various ones of the pores 110 become obstructed by particulate matter in fluid 52. This effect can become especially pronounced when these separations are on the order of several microns as would be the case when the nozzle plate 49 and filter membrane 100 are formed as an integrated unit by the use of MEMS techniques.
Referring to
Experimental results included the following observations. Larger jet deflections (for example, in the X direction) are associated with a smaller separation distance H when compared to a larger separation distance H when one or more pores 110 of the pore cluster 120 become obstructed by particles. For a given separation distance H, the jet deflections associated with the pore cluster arrangement of
Although the present invention is not to be bound by any particular theories, observations as to why the pore cluster 120 configuration of
Referring to
Without limitation, other causes can additionally or alternatively contribute to these effects. The use of particular pore cluster 120 configuration in example embodiments of the invention can be motivated by different reasons including a desired nozzle plate 49 to filter membrane 100 separation distance H. In some example embodiments, a particular pore cluster 120 configuration is employed based at least on a nozzle plate 49 to filter membrane 100 separation, H where H is selected from a range defined by 0.5 DN<H<5 DN (i.e. DN being a size of a nozzle 50 as previously defined).
In step 320, the regions of substrate 160 that were etched in step 315 are filled with filler material 166, for example, polyimide, and planarized as illustrated in
In step 330, one or more secondary liquid chambers 53B are patterned and etched into semiconductor layer 164B. Liquid chambers 53B are positioned upstream of pore clusters 120 relative to anticipated flow direction of liquid within the printhead. Liquid channels 53B provide fluid communication between the liquid source, for example, ink source, and the filter membrane, while the walls 55B in layer 164B provide structural support. In some embodiments, a single liquid chamber 53B spans the entire nozzle array and provides fluid communication between the ink source and the pore clusters 120 associated with each of the nozzles. In step 335, filler material 166 is removed to complete the integrated nozzle plate/filter membrane unit as shown in
Referring to
Jetting module 48 includes a plurality of liquid chambers 53A, each of the liquid chambers 53A providing a portion of liquid 52 to a respective one of nozzles 50. In this example embodiment, filter membrane 100 is separated from nozzles 50 by the plurality of liquid chambers 53A. The liquid chambers 53A provide for fluid communication between nozzles 50 and pores 110 of pore cluster 120. Each liquid chamber 53 can be positioned for fluid communication with a different one of the plurality of nozzles 50.
In this example embodiment, filter 100 includes a first side 100A and a second side 100B that is upstream relative to a direction of fluid flow and first side 100A. In this embodiment, the plurality of walls 55 are a first plurality of walls 55A that extend to the first side 100A of the filter 100. A second plurality of walls 55B extend from the second side 100B of the filter 100 toward channel 47 (shown in
Referring to
The second plurality of walls 55B define a plurality of liquid feed channels 53B with each of the liquid feed channels 53B being in fluid communication through one of the plurality of pore clusters 120 with a respective one of the plurality of liquid chambers 53A. The liquid feed channels 53B and the liquid chambers 53A can be substantially co-linear with the respective one of the plurality of nozzles 50. Liquid feed channels 53B are also in fluid communication with feed channel 47 (shown in
Referring to
Embodiments of the present invention advantageously allow for the formation of integrated nozzle plate/filter membrane units formed from a single substrate. Embodiments of the present invention advantageously allow for the use of MEMS fabrication techniques which can substantially lower particulate contamination associated with other manufacturing techniques. Embodiments of the present invention advantageously allow for the formation of integrated nozzle plate/filter membrane units with acceptable jet straightness.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain example embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4068241 | Yamada | Jan 1978 | A |
4636808 | Herron | Jan 1987 | A |
4638327 | Sutera et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4639748 | Drake et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
5124717 | Campanelli et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5141596 | Hawkins et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5204690 | Lorenze, Jr. et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5489930 | Anderson | Feb 1996 | A |
5691753 | Hilton | Nov 1997 | A |
6079821 | Chwalek et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086195 | Bohorquez et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6234623 | Drake | May 2001 | B1 |
6264309 | Sullivan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267251 | Sullivan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280643 | Silverbrook | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6457807 | Hawkins et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491362 | Jeanmaire | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505921 | Chwalek et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6554410 | Jeanmaire et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6575566 | Jeanmaire et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582064 | Cruz-Uribe et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583350 | Gee et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6588888 | Jeanmaire et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6626522 | Rapp et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6793328 | Jeanmaire | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6827429 | Jeanmaire et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6851796 | Jeanmaire et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6905619 | Kawamura et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916090 | Valley et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923530 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943037 | Anagnostopoulos et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7101030 | Clark et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121643 | Yamada | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7192131 | Gao et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7431444 | Ito | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7484835 | Kim et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7607766 | Steiner | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8201928 | Gerner et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20040012662 | Kneezel et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040179073 | Valley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050018022 | Studer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050151798 | Merz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20110261124 | Baumer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
901 906 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1 095 776 | Oct 2006 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110261123 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |