The present invention relates to the field of inkjet printers and, discloses an inkjet printing system using printheads manufactured with microelectro-mechanical systems (MEMS) techniques.
Many different types of printing have been invented, a large number of which are presently in use. The known forms of print have a variety of methods for marking the print media with a relevant marking media. Commonly used forms of printing include offset printing, laser printing and copying devices, dot matrix type impact printers, thermal paper printers, film recorders, thermal wax printers, dye sublimation printers and ink jet printers both of the drop on demand and continuous flow type. Each type of printer has its own advantages and problems when considering cost, speed, quality, reliability, simplicity of construction and operation etc.
In recent years, the field of ink jet printing, wherein each individual pixel of ink is derived from one or more ink nozzles has become increasingly popular primarily due to its inexpensive and versatile nature.
Many different techniques on ink jet printing have been invented. For a survey of the field, reference is made to an article by J Moore, “Non-Impact Printing: Introduction and Historical Perspective”, Output Hard Copy Devices, Editors R Dubeck and S Sherr, pages 207-220 (1988).
Ink Jet printers themselves come in many different types. The utilization of a continuous stream of ink in ink jet printing appears to date back to at least 1929 wherein U.S. Pat. No. 1,941,001 by Hansell discloses a simple form of continuous stream electro-static ink jet printing.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,596,275 by Sweet also discloses a process of a continuous ink jet printing including the step wherein the ink jet stream is modulated by a high frequency electro-static field so as to cause drop separation. This technique is still utilized by several manufacturers including Elmjet and Scitex (see also U.S. Pat. No. 3,373,437 by Sweet et al)
Piezoelectric ink jet printers are also one form of commonly utilized ink jet printing device. Piezoelectric systems are disclosed by Kyser et. al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,946,398 (1970) which utilizes a diaphragm mode of operation, by Zolten in U.S. Pat. No. 3,683,212 (1970) which discloses a squeeze mode of operation of a piezoelectric crystal, Stemme in U.S. Pat. No. 3,747,120 (1972) discloses a bend mode of piezoelectric operation, Howkins in U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,601 discloses a piezoelectric push mode actuation of the ink jet stream and Fischbeck in U.S. Pat. No. 4,584,590 which discloses a shear mode type of piezoelectric transducer element.
Recently, thermal ink jet printing has become an extremely popular form of ink jet printing. The ink jet printing techniques include those disclosed by Endo et al in GB 2007162 (1979) and Vaught et al in U.S. Pat. No. 4,490,728. Both the aforementioned references disclosed ink jet printing techniques that rely upon the activation of an electrothermal actuator which results in the creation of a bubble in a constricted space, such as a nozzle, which thereby causes the ejection of ink from an aperture connected to the confined space onto a relevant print media. Printing devices utilizing the electro-thermal actuator are manufactured by manufacturers such as Canon and Hewlett Packard.
As can be seen from the foregoing, many different types of printing technologies are available. Ideally, a printing technology should have a number of desirable attributes. These include inexpensive construction and operation, high speed operation, safe and continuous long term operation etc. Each technology may have its own advantages and disadvantages in the areas of cost, speed, quality, reliability, power usage, simplicity of construction operation, durability and consumables.
A problem with inkjet printheads, and especially inkjet printheads having a high nozzle density, is that ink can flood across the printhead surface contaminating adjacent nozzles. This is undesirable because it results in reduced print quality. Moreover, cross-contamination of ink across the printhead surface can potentially result in electrolysis and accelerated corrosion of nozzle actuators.
Previous attempts to minimize ink flooding across the printhead surface typically involve coating the printhead with a hydrophobic material. However, hydrophobic coatings have only had limited success in minimizing the extent of flooding.
A further problem with inkjet printheads, especially inkjet printheads having senstitive MEMS nozzles formed on an ink ejection surface of the printhead, is that the nozzle structures can become damaged by cleaning the printhead surface. Typically, printheads are wiped regularly to remove particles of paper dust or paper fibers, which build up on the ink ejection surface. When a wiping mechanism comes into contact with nozzle structures on the printhead surface, there is an obvious risk of damaging the nozzles.
It would be desirable to provide a printhead, which minimizes cross-contamination by ink flooding between adjacent nozzles. It would be further desirable to provide a printhead, which allows regular cleaning of the printhead surface by a wiping mechanism without risk of damaging nozzle structures on the printhead.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a unit cell, a plurality of which make up a printhead, includes a substrate including an ink inlet passage; a chamber defined by chamber sidewalls and a nozzle plate defining an aperture for ejection of ink from the chamber, the chamber being in fluid communication with the inlet passage; and a nozzle enclosure comprising enclosure sidewalls and a roof defining an opening for ejection of ink, the nozzle enclosure surrounding the aperture such that ink ejected from the aperture is directed to the opening of the nozzle enclosure, thereby isolating the aperture from an adjacent aperture of an adjacent unit cell. The opening has a greater diameter than the aperture.
Notwithstanding any other forms that may fall within the scope of the present invention, preferred forms of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
With reference to
The printhead also includes, with respect to each nozzle 3, side walls 6 on which the nozzle plate is supported, a chamber 7 defined by the walls and the nozzle plate 2, a multi-layer substrate 8 and an inlet passage 9 extending through the multi-layer substrate to the far side (not shown) of the substrate. A looped, elongate heater element 10 is suspended within the chamber 7, so that the element is in the form of a suspended beam. The printhead as shown is a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) structure, which is formed by a lithographic process which is described in more detail below.
When the printhead is in use, ink 11 from a reservoir (not shown) enters the chamber 7 via the inlet passage 9, so that the chamber fills to the level as shown in
When the element 10 is heated as described above, the bubble 12 forms along the length of the element, this bubble appearing, in the cross-sectional view of
The bubble 12, once generated, causes an increase in pressure within the chamber 7, which in turn causes the ejection of a drop 16 of the ink 11 through the nozzle 3. The rim 4 assists in directing the drop 16 as it is ejected, so as to minimize the chance of drop misdirection.
The reason that there is only one nozzle 3 and chamber 7 per inlet passage 9 is so that the pressure wave generated within the chamber, on heating of the element 10 and forming of a bubble 12, does not affect adjacent chambers and their corresponding nozzles. The pressure wave generated within the chamber creates significant stresses in the chamber wall. Forming the chamber from an amorphous ceramic such as silicon nitride, silicon dioxide (glass) or silicon oxynitride, gives the chamber walls high strength while avoiding the use of material with a crystal structure. Crystalline defects can act as stress concentration points and therefore potential areas of weakness and ultimately failure.
The increase in pressure within the chamber 7 not only pushes ink 11 out through the nozzle 3, but also pushes some ink back through the inlet passage 9. However, the inlet passage 9 is approximately 200 to 300 microns in length, and is only approximately 16 microns in diameter. Hence there is a substantial viscous drag. As a result, the predominant effect of the pressure rise in the chamber 7 is to force ink out through the nozzle 3 as an ejected drop 16, rather than back through the inlet passage 9.
Turning now to
The collapsing of the bubble 12 towards the point of collapse 17 causes some ink 11 to be drawn from within the nozzle 3 (from the sides 18 of the drop), and some to be drawn from the inlet passage 9, towards the point of collapse. Most of the ink 11 drawn in this manner is drawn from the nozzle 3, forming an annular neck 19 at the base of the drop 16 prior to its breaking off.
The drop 16 requires a certain amount of momentum to overcome surface tension forces, in order to break off. As ink 11 is drawn from the nozzle 3 by the collapse of the bubble 12, the diameter of the neck 19 reduces thereby reducing the amount of total surface tension holding the drop, so that the momentum of the drop as it is ejected out of the nozzle is sufficient to allow the drop to break off.
When the drop 16 breaks off, cavitation forces are caused as reflected by the arrows 20, as the bubble 12 collapses to the point of collapse 17. It will be noted that there are no solid surfaces in the vicinity of the point of collapse 17 on which the cavitation can have an effect.
Referring to
The nozzle enclosure 60 minimize cross-contamination between adjacent apertures 5 by containing any flooded ink in the immediate vicinity of each nozzle. Flooding of ink from each nozzle may be caused by a variety of reasons, such as nozzle misfires or pressure fluctuations in ink supply channels. The nozzle enclosure may be formed from or coated with a hydrophobic material during the fabrication process, which further minimizes the risk of cross-contamination.
A further advantage of the printhead according to the invention is that it allows the nozzle plate 2 of the printhead to be wiped without risk of damaging the sensitive nozzle structures. Typically, inkjet printheads are cleaned by a wiping mechanism as part of a warm-up cycle. The nozzle enclosures 60 provide a protective barrier between the nozzles and the wiping mechanism (not shown).
In the interests of brevity, the fabrication stages have been shown for the unit cell of
Referring to
A passivation layer 24 is deposited onto the top metal layer 26 by plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD). After deposition of the passivation layer 24, it is etched to define a circular recess, which forms parts of the inlet passage 9. At the same as etching the recess, a plurality of vias 50 are also etched, which allow electrical connection through the passivation layer 24 to the top metal layer 26. The etch pattern is defined by a layer of patterned photoresist (not shown), which is removed by O2 ashing after the etch.
Referring to
Referring to
Importantly, the first sacrificial scaffold 54 has sloped or angled side faces 55. These angled side faces 55 are formed by adjusting the focusing in the exposure tool (e.g. stepper) when exposing the photoresist. The sloped side faces 55 advantageously allow heater material 38 to be deposited substantially evenly over the first sacrificial scaffold 54.
Referring to
Referring to
Adjacent unit cells are electrically insulated from each other by virtue of grooves etched around the perimeter of each unit cell. The grooves are etched at the same time as defining the heater element 10.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
With the nozzle structure, including nozzle enclosure 60, now fully formed on a frontside of the silicon substrate 21, an ink supply channel 32 is etched from the backside of the substrate 21, which meets with the front plug 53.
Referring to
It should be noted that a portion of photoresist, on either side of the nozzle chamber sidewalls 6, remains encapsulated by the roof 44, the unit cell sidewalls 56 and the chamber sidewalls 6. This portion of photoresist is sealed from the O2 ashing plasma and, therefore, remains intact after fabrication of the printhead. This encapsulated photoresist advantageously provides additional robustness for the printhead by supporting the nozzle plate 2. Hence, the printhead has a robust nozzle plate spanning continuously over rows of nozzles, and being supported by solid blocks of hardened photoresist, in addition to support walls.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/015,218 filed on Jan. 16, 2008, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/084,237 filed on Mar. 21, 2005 all of which are herein incorporated by reference. The following applications have been filed by the Applicant: 7,331,6517,334,870 The disclosures of these co-pending applications are incorporated herein by reference. The following patents or patent applications filed by the applicant or assignee of the present invention are hereby incorporated by cross-reference. 6750901647686367883366322181736425672584177293853732896872703957461916751026473348647255419728481972291487258416727326372703936984017734752674650157364255735747611/003614728482073413287246875732266966231016406129650591664578096550895645781271529626428133720494172821647465342727872774171417452989736766571383917153956742314574562777550585712207671483457416280725236674880517360865727581176284687334874739308374759657578582759153910/922887747298410/922874723479574018847328975729385574102507401900752735774102437360871766179377083726746105715650871599727083271716583470808947201469709033671564897413283743838570832577258422725542372199807591533741627473676497118192761812173226727077505719835470775047614724719835574018947322676715295972139067178901722293871083537104629724688671284007108355699132272878367118197757529873642697077493696240276864297147308752403471181987168790717227072291556830318719534271752617465035710835671182027510269713474475102707134743718243972107687465036713474571564847118201711192674314337721948707971268259457330974681303969875067038797698031868162747102772735023666810456728000717372270884597707082706838270626516789194678919166446426502614662299966693856549935698757367279966591884643970667601197295332706485168265476290349642815567850166831682674187169278716980306696543968406067036918697774669702647068389709399171904917511847766378010/9624127177054736428210/96573310/9659337728872753879369827986870966682263967375917055739723332068301966832717695776871704997106888712323910/7271627377608739904371216397165824715294210/72715771815727096137730259272780347188282759282910/72718010/72717910/72719210/727274770762175231117573301766099810/75453610/75493810/72716073692706795215707009871546386805419685928969777516398332639457366229236747760692114410/88488170921127192106737426674271177448707728133010/85450373289567735944718892870939897377609760084310/854498739007110/85452510/854526754971572523537607757726741710/85450575170367275805731426172817777290852748483110/85452310/854527754971810/8545207631190755794110/85449910/8545017266661724319310/85451810/93462874487347425050736426372014687360868723480273032557287846715651110/76026472584327097291764502510/7602487083273736764773743557441880754709210/760206751359810/76027071983527364264730325172014707121655729386172322087328985734423270832727621620766996173316637360861732897374271217407262730325272498227537309731138273608607364257739007573508967429096738413573316607416287748805273226847322685731138172704057303268747000773990727393076768196775883017249833752401674909277331661752404373001407357492735749375661067380902728481672848457255430739008073289847350913732267173809107431424747000675850547347534
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12015218 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 12832975 | US | |
Parent | 11084237 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12015218 | US |