The present invention relates to printing stock for making security and other information badges.
Many businesses utilize badges, such as radio frequency identification (RFID) or magnetic strip badges, in order to control access to various areas in their facilities. It is common for such businesses to supply an RFID badge to a visitor to provide either limited or complete access to an area or a facility. The badge may also provide information to the host with regard to what areas have been accessed by the visitor. Often this badge is supplied with no visual identification associating the badge with the visitor; however, it is commonly desirable to provide a visual method of association. It is also common that the addition of a photograph and/or a bar code to the visual identification may be of further benefit in the identification of the visitor and their association with the RFID badge. It is common practice to provide an RFID badge and a separate visitor identification badge or label, using either hand-written or machine-printed identification methods.
Many businesses also provide RFID or magnetic stripe badges to control and monitor employee access to their facilities. It is common practice for these businesses to purchase or lease printers that utilize thermal transfer or dye sublimation technology to print individual badges. These printers are typically costly and are frequently difficult to justify if the number of employees is relatively small.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for methods and apparatus that facilitate and enhance the making of security or control-access badges. The present invention satisfies one or more of these needs.
The present invention relates to printing stock for making security and other name-type badges.
According to one aspect of the invention, and by way of example only, printing stock for making, in combination with a badge base, an information badge, includes a face sheet and a liner. The face sheet includes a layer of adhesive, with the liner releasably adhered to the layer of adhesive. The face sheet also includes a badge label, for example, as defined by a weakening line cut into the face sheet. In addition, the liner includes a badge liner, for example, as defined therein by a weakening line cut into the liner. The badge liner is smaller in dimensions than the badge label and is positioned with respect to the badge label such that when the badge label is removed from the face sheet, the badge liner is removed from the liner and remains adhered to the badge label.
The relationship between the badge label and the badge liner presents a number of advantages in making information badges, such as controlled-access badges, security badges, and name badges. For example, the badge liner reduces the amount of exposed adhesive when the badge label is removed from the printing stock. Accordingly, a user is better able to position and align the badge label on a badge base. When properly positioned on the badge base, the badge liner may then be removed from the badge label to fully adhere the badge label to the base. If the badge label is initially misaligned on the badge base, a user can remove the badge label, and then reposition the badge label on the badge base.
In addition, to prevent re-use, the badge label may include a destruct discontinuity, for example, a weakening line cut into the badge label. Accordingly, when a printed badge label is removed from a badge base (e.g., so that the badge base can be reused), the printed badge label tears at the destruct continuity, thereby destroying the printed badge label.
Another advantage of the printing stock is that in a number of embodiments, the face sheet has dimensions for enabling passage of the printing stock through a small-office home-office (SOHO) printer, such as inkjet and laser printers. These printers are relatively inexpensive and are commonly used by consumers and businesses of all sizes. For example, the printing stock or the face sheet may be substantially rectangular with dimensions of about 4 inches by about 6 inches. In addition, the badge label may have dimensions that complement and correspond to standard-sized badge bases, e.g., about 3⅜ inches by about 2⅛ inches
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring more particularly to the drawings, printing stock 100 for making, in combination with a badge base (indicated by reference 122 in
As shown in
The relationship between the badge label 102 and the badge liner 104 presents a number of advantages in making information badges, such as controlled-access badges, security badges, and name badges. For example, the badge liner 104 reduces the amount of exposed adhesive when the badge label 102 is removed from the printing stock 100. Accordingly, a user is better able to position and align the badge label 102 on a badge base or card. When properly positioned on the badge base, the badge liner 104 may then be removed from the badge label 102 to fully adhere the badge label 102 to the base.
Another advantage of the printing stock 100 is that in a number of embodiments, the face sheet 101A has dimensions for enabling passage of the printing stock 100 through a small-office home-office (SOHO) printer, such as inkjet and laser printers which are typically and relatively inexpensive and which are commonly used by consumers and small business. For example, the printing stock 100 or the face sheet 101A may be substantially rectangular with dimensions of about 4 inches by about 6 inches. In addition, in embodiments in which a standard-sized badge base is utilized, the badge label 102 may be substantially rectangular with dimensions of about 3⅜ inches by about 2⅛ inches.
The face stock or sheet 101A may be made of a paper or opaque film. The weakening lines 103 (and other weakening lines) may be die cut or perforations. In addition, in some of the embodiments, the badge label 102 may have dimensions that are similar or identical to those of standard badge bases, either RFID or magnetic strip badges. Three of the four corners of the badge label 102 may have a radius 105 similar to that of an RFID or magnetic strip badge, such as a ⅛-inch radius. The fourth corner may have a chamfer 107, such as shown in
The badge label 102 may have a die-cut eyelet 106 that corresponds to a complementary eyelet formed through the badge base for receiving a strap of a badge tag. The badge label 102 also may have a destruct discontinuity 108 such as a die-cut weakening line, within the rectangular label, such as that shown in
Referencing
An image that is useful for identification, such as a photograph 114, text 116, and/or a bar code 118 may be printed on the badge label 102 as shown in
As shown in
When removed from the printing stock, the badge label 102 may then be mounted on a badge card or base 122 as shown in
As shown in
In the event that the badge label 102 is not properly aligned with the base 122 before the liner 102 is removed, then the partially adhered badge label 102 may be removed from the base 122 by peeling, repositioned or realigned with the badge base 122, re-adhered to the base 122 when properly aligned. The badge liner 104 may then be removed to complete the badge 124.
Alternately, the badge liner 104 may include a tab 129 that protrudes beyond the face stock of the badge label 102 as shown in
An example of a completed information badge 124 is shown in
One embodiment to improve the ease of removal of the badge liner 104 is to include the tab 129 that extends beyond the perimeter of the badge label 102 as described above with reference to
The badge label 102 with badge liner 104 attached may be placed directly on top of the badge base 122, and may be moved easily across the top surface of the base 122 because the badge liner 104 over most of the badge label 102 may keep most of the exposed adhesive 119A from adhering. Once correct alignment has been achieved, the user may press the area opposite the tab 129 in order to attach that portion of the badge label 102 to the base 122. The badge label 102 and the base 122 may appear as shown in
The user may ideally utilize the tab 129 to lift the un-adhered portion of the badge label 102, separate the badge liner 104 at the end nearest to the adhered portion of the badge label 102, and roll the badge label 102 onto the base 122, as shown in
With reference to
The chamfer 107 may be provided on one of the corners of the badge label 102 so that a portion of the badge base 122 is exposed, as shown enlarged in
As mentioned above with reference to
Another embodiment of the printing stock 100 is illustrated in
In other embodiments, such as shown in
The badge liner 104 may also include an eyelet cut 136 defining a tab-like section 137 disposed spatially over the eyelet 106 in the face sheet. Accordingly, when the badge label 102 is removed from the printing stock 100, the tab-like section 137 retains the portion of the face sheet 101A within the eyelet 106, so that the portion of the face sheet 101A of the eyelet 106 is retained by the liner 101B.
In other embodiments, the badge label 102 may not include the chamfer 107. In still other embodiments, the badge label 102 may not include the eyelet 106. In these latter embodiments, the eyelet may be formed after the badge label 102 has been applied to a base 122. In addition, the printing stock 100 may include a water-resistant film layer to increase the durability of the badge 124.
Once the badge 124 has been returned, the hosting business may remove the badge label 102 by catching the chamfer 107 shown in
Alternate methods of tamper evidence may also be employed. One such method may require utilizing a clear or translucent face material pattern coated on the back side of the face material with a release agent, then bonded to a pigmented adhesive, so that separation of the badge label 102 from the base 122 extracts visible patterns of adhesive from the clear or translucent face material, rendering both parts visibly altered. Another method of tamper evidence is to have the face material inherently weak or somehow weakened so that the adhesive bond destroys the badge label 102 when attempting to remove it from the base 122. Another method leaves darkened sections of material on the base 122. Another method is to use an extensible label material such as vinyl that may deform upon removal. This label may incorporate any of the above mentioned tamper evident features, as well as others, or it may incorporate no tamper evident feature.
Another embodiment of the present invention may be utilized for longer term usage, such as employee identification, and is a variation of the above embodiments that may or may not eliminate the features that facilitate removal and/or tamper evidence, as shown in
The same features of the embodiments described above may be incorporated whether the badge is in the portrait orientation as shown in
A system 150 for making information badges is shown in
For the purposes of this description, the term information badge includes any type of badge that may include one or more of the following items: name, serial number, and other textual information; photograph, fingerprint, or other representative information; computer-readable devices such as bar codes, magnetic strips, RFID circuits, and so on. Examples of information badges include name badges, control-access badges, and security badges.
Those skilled in the art will understand that the preceding embodiments of the present invention provide the foundation for numerous alternatives and modifications thereto. These other modifications are also within the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to that precisely as shown and described in the present invention.
The present application claims priority on U.S. Provisional Applications for Patent Ser. No. 60/588,815 filed Jul. 15, 2004 and 60/634,851 filed Dec. 10, 2004, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4060168 | Romagnoli | Nov 1977 | A |
4285146 | Charles et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4306367 | Otto | Dec 1981 | A |
4368244 | Danzig | Jan 1983 | A |
4653775 | Raphael et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4787158 | Vitol | Nov 1988 | A |
4889749 | Ohashi et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4900903 | Wright et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4947567 | Hermann | Aug 1990 | A |
4986868 | Schmidt | Jan 1991 | A |
5058926 | Drower | Oct 1991 | A |
5075769 | Allen et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5172938 | Schmidt | Dec 1992 | A |
5180906 | Yamada | Jan 1993 | A |
5209514 | Hebert | May 1993 | A |
5284364 | Jain | Feb 1994 | A |
5302475 | Adler et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5362106 | Longtin | Nov 1994 | A |
5453336 | Adler et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5484167 | Donaldson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5509693 | Kohls | Apr 1996 | A |
5518787 | Konkol | May 1996 | A |
5529345 | Kohls | Jun 1996 | A |
5556720 | Charkey | Sep 1996 | A |
5617528 | Stechmann et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5662976 | Popat et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
D386793 | Haas et al. | Nov 1997 | S |
5717776 | Watanabe | Feb 1998 | A |
D394675 | Haas et al. | May 1998 | S |
5814796 | Benson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5840143 | Swanson | Nov 1998 | A |
5884425 | Baldwin | Mar 1999 | A |
5893587 | Wong | Apr 1999 | A |
5913542 | Belucci et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6000608 | Dorf | Dec 1999 | A |
6002427 | Kipust | Dec 1999 | A |
D419595 | Haas et al. | Jan 2000 | S |
6014748 | Tushic et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038012 | Bley | Mar 2000 | A |
6078756 | Squilla et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6104922 | Baumann | Aug 2000 | A |
6110864 | Lu | Aug 2000 | A |
6142531 | Harris, II | Nov 2000 | A |
6179201 | Chess | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197396 | Haas et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220515 | Bello | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230148 | Pare et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
D445127 | Haas et al. | Jul 2001 | S |
6292092 | Chow et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308886 | Benson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335799 | Provost | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356942 | Bengtsson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6394356 | Zagami | May 2002 | B1 |
6402028 | Graham, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412692 | Miyagawa | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6447015 | Linnewiel | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6517921 | Ulrich et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
D476680 | Haas | Jul 2003 | S |
6632250 | Lynch et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6862827 | Gregory | Mar 2005 | B2 |
20020047263 | McCarthy et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030168850 | Mann | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030173408 | Mosher, Jr. et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29 41 683 AL | Oct 1979 | DE |
0 371 301 | Nov 1989 | EP |
1 342 586 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2683949 | May 1993 | FR |
73-026487 | Apr 1973 | JP |
48-26487 | Aug 1973 | JP |
56-143667 | Nov 1981 | JP |
56-147364 | Nov 1981 | JP |
02-135666 | May 1990 | JP |
05-23760 | Feb 1993 | JP |
05-023760 | Feb 1993 | JP |
07-161376 | Jun 1995 | JP |
09-298060 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10-083810 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2079186 | May 1997 | RU |
586516 | Dec 1977 | SU |
WO 9853984 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 2004034347 | Apr 2004 | WO |
PCTUS2005024604 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060057325 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60588815 | Jul 2004 | US | |
60634851 | Dec 2004 | US |