The present disclosure relates to a xerographic printing system. More specifically, this disclosure relates to a sheet feeder system and method for feeding sheets to one or more printing modules, the sheets being fed including any kind of media appropriate for use as a substrate for printing within a xerographic printing system.
As illustrated in
A conventional sheet feeder module can include one or more feeders, as illustrated in
This disclosure provides a system and method of increasing the sheet feed rate by the addition of a rear nudger.
The following applications, the disclosures of each being totally incorporated herein by reference are mentioned:
U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/631,651 filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “TIGHTLY INTEGRATED PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE MAKING USE OF COMBINED COLOR AND MONOCHROME ENGINES,” by David G. Anderson, et al.;
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/631,918 filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE OPERATIONS FOR FINAL APPEARANCE AND PERMANENCE,” by David G. Anderson et al.;
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/631,921, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE OPERATIONS FOR FINAL APPEARANCE AND PERMANENCE,” by David G. Anderson et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/761,522, filed Jan. 21, 2004, entitled “HIGH RATE PRINT MERGING AND FINISHING SYSTEM FOR PARALLEL PRINTING,” by Barry P. Mandel, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/785,211, filed Feb. 24, 2004, entitled “UNIVERSAL FLEXIBLE PLURAL PRINTER TO PLURAL FINISHER SHEET INTEGRATION SYSTEM,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/881,619, filed Jun. 30, 2004, entitled “FLEXIBLE PAPER PATH USING MULTIDIRECTIONAL PATH MODULES,” by Daniel G. Bobrow;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/917,676, filed Aug. 13, 2004, entitled “MULTIPLE OBJECT SOURCES CONTROLLED AND/OR SELECTED BASED ON A COMMON SENSOR,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/917,768, filed Aug. 13, 2004, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE CONSISTING OF CONTAINERIZED IMAGE MARKING ENGINES AND MEDIA FEEDER MODULES,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,106, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH HORIZONTAL HIGHWAY AND SINGLE PASS DUPLEX,” by Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,113, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH INVERTER DISPOSED FOR MEDIA VELOCITY BUFFERING AND REGISTRATION,” by Joannes N. M. deJong, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,458, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINT SEQUENCE SCHEDULING FOR RELIABILITY,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,459, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE USING IMAGE MARKING ENGINE MODULES (as amended),” by Barry P. Mandel, et al;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/933,556, filed Sep. 3, 2004, entitled “SUBSTRATE INVERTER SYSTEMS AND METHODS,” by Stan A. Spencer, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/953,953, filed Sep. 29, 2004, entitled “CUSTOMIZED SET POINT CONTROL FOR OUTPUT STABILITY IN A TIPP ARCHITECTURE,” by Charles A. Radulski et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/999,326, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “SEMI-AUTOMATIC IMAGE QUALITY ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPLE MARKING ENGINE SYSTEMS,” by Robert E. Grace, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/999,450, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “ADDRESSABLE FUSING FOR AN INTEGRATED PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/000,158, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “GLOSSING SYSTEM FOR USE IN A TIPP ARCHITECTURE,” by Bryan J. Roof;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/000,168, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “ADDRESSABLE FUSING AND HEATING METHODS AND APPARATUS,” by David K. Biegelsen, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/000,258, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “GLOSSING SYSTEM FOR USE IN A TIPP ARCHITECTURE,” by Bryan J. Roof;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/001,890, filed Dec. 2, 2004, entitled “HIGH RATE PRINT MERGING AND FINISHING SYSTEM FOR PARALLEL PRINTING,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/002,528, filed Dec. 2, 2004, entitled “HIGH RATE PRINT MERGING AND FINISHING SYSTEM FOR PARALLEL PRINTING,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/051,817, filed Feb. 4, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/069,020, filed Feb. 28, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/070,681, filed Mar. 2, 2005, entitled “GRAY BALANCE FOR A PRINTING SYSTEM OF MULTIPLE MARKING ENGINES,” by R. Enrique Viturro, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/081,473, filed Mar. 16, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Steven R. Moore;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/084,280, filed Mar. 18, 2005, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING UNIFORMITY IN IMAGES,” by Howard Mizes;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/089,854, filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled “SHEET REGISTRATION WITHIN A MEDIA INVERTER,” by Robert A. Clark et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/090,498, filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled “INVERTER WITH RETURN/BYPASS PAPER PATH,” by Robert A. Clark;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/090,502, filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled IMAGE QUALITY CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MULTIPLE MARKING ENGINE SYSTEMS,” by Michael C. Mongeon;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/093,229, filed Mar. 29, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Paul C. Julien;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/095,872, filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Paul C. Julien;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/094,864, filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Jeremy C. deJong, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/095,378, filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “IMAGE ON PAPER REGISTRATION ALIGNMENT,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/094,998, filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE WITH PARALLEL HORIZONTAL PRINTING MODULES,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/102,899, filed Apr. 8, 2005, entitled “SYNCHRONIZATION IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM,” by Lara S. Crawford, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/102,910, filed Apr. 8, 2005, entitled “COORDINATION IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM,” by Lara S. Crawford, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/102,355, filed Apr. 8, 2005, entitled “COMMUNICATION IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM,” by Markus P. J. Fromherz, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/102,332, filed Apr. 8, 2005, entitled “ON-THE-FLY STATE SYNCHRONIZATION IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM,” by Haitham A. Hindi;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/109,558, filed Apr. 19, 2005, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING IMAGE REGISTRATION ERRORS,” by Michael R. Furst et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/109,566, filed Apr. 19, 2005, entitled “MEDIA TRANSPORT SYSTEM,” by Mandel et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/109,996, filed Apr. 20, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS,” by Michael C. Mongeon et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/115,766, Filed Apr. 27, 2005, entitled “IMAGE QUALITY ADJUSTMENT METHOD AND SYSTEM,” by Robert E. Grace;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/122,420, filed May 5, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM AND SCHEDULING METHOD,” by Austin L. Richards;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/136,821, filed May 25, 2005, entitled “AUTOMATED PROMOTION OF MONOCHROME JOBS FOR HLC PRODUCTION PRINTERS,” by David C. Robinson;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/136,959, filed May 25, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS”, by Kristine A. German et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/137,634, filed May 25, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM”, by Robert M. Lofthus et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/137,251, filed May 25, 2005, entitled “SCHEDULING SYSTEM”, by Robert M. Lofthus et al.;
U.S. C-I-P application Ser. No. 11/137,273, filed May 25, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM”, by David G. Anderson et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/143,818, filed Jun. 2, 2005, entitled “INTER-SEPARATION DECORRELATOR”, by Edul N. Dalal et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/146,665, filed Jun. 7, 2005, entitled “LOW COST ADJUSTMENT METHOD FOR PRINTING SYSTEMS”, by Michael C. Mongeon;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/152,275, filed Jun. 14, 2005, entitled “WARM-UP OF MULTIPLE INTEGRATED MARKING ENGINES”, by Bryan J. Roof et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/156,778, filed Jun. 20, 2005, entitled “PRINTING PLATFORM”, by Joseph A. Swift;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/157,598, filed Jun. 21, 2005, entitled “METHOD OF ORDERING JOB QUEUE OF MARKING SYSTEMS”, by Neil A. Frankel.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,941,518, issued to Sokac et al., the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, provides a sheet feeder system.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,540, issued to Martin et al., the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, provides a sheet feeder system.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,941,518, issued to Evangelista et al., the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, provides a sheet feeder system.
According to one exemplary embodiment, a printing system sheet feeder apparatus is provided. The printing system feeder comprising a sheet stack including two or more sheets of media stacked in a vertical position and a front nudger roll positioned near the leading edge of the top sheet, the front nudger roll capable of advancing the top sheet. In addition, the printing system sheet feeder apparatus includes a separation nip aligned with the front nudger roll and capable of receiving the top sheet advanced by the front nudger roll and advancing the top sheet in a direction away from the front nudger. A rear nudger roll is positioned near the trailing edge of the top sheet and is capable of advancing the sheet directly below the top sheet while the top sheet is being advanced by the front nudger roll and/or separation nip.
According to another exemplary embodiment, a printing system sheet feeder apparatus is provided wherein the rear nudger roll axis of rotation is located a distance X1 from the trailing edge of the sheet stack, and the separation nip axis of rotation is located a distance X2 from the leading edge of the sheet stack. The front nudger roll engages and advances the top sheet in a direction towards the separation nip and the distance X1 is less than X2.
According to another aspect of this disclosure, a method of feeding sheets to a printing system is provided. The method comprising starting a sheet feed cycle; applying a tangential force near the leading edge of a top sheet of a sheet stack; driving the top sheet into a separation nip; removing the said force near the leading edge of the top sheet after the top sheet leading edge passes through the separation nip; driving the top sheet with the separation nip to a take-away nip, while simultaneously applying a tangential force near the trailing edge of a next sheet directly below the top sheet; and removing the tangential force from the next sheet after driving the next sheet a predetermined distance towards the separation nip.
According to another embodiment of this disclosure, a xerographic printing system is provided. The xerographic printing system comprising one or more sheet feeder apparatuses. Each sheet feeder apparatus comprising a sheet stack comprising two or more sheets of media stacked in a vertical position which includes a top sheet and a sheet directly below the top sheet, each sheet including a leading edge and a trailing edge; a front nudger roll positioned near the leading edge of the top sheet of the sheet stack, capable of advancing the top sheet; a separation nip aligned with the front nudger roll and capable of receiving the top sheet advanced by the front nudger roll and advancing the top sheet in a direction away from the front nudger; and a rear nudger roll, the rear nudger roll being positioned near the trailing edge of the top sheet and capable of advancing the sheet directly below the top sheet while the top sheet is being advanced by the front nudger roll and/or separation nip.
As discussed above in the background section of this disclosure, a conventional friction retard feeder, as illustrated in
In operation, the forward nudger 26 and the separation nip 20 start rotating in a forward direction (clockwise with reference to
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
There are various systems and methods that can be used to apply a net normal force to the trailing edge of a sheet. As described heretofore, a rear nudger roller 30 arrangement has been described. However, as will be described below, other arrangements can be employed as one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate.
Referencing
Illustrated in
As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, other designs can be used to prevent the rear nudger roll 70 from driving multiple sheets into the feed nip 74. For example, this could be accomplished by one or more top sheet position sensors and the necessary signals to control the driving mechanisms of the rear nudger roll 70 and feeder roll 88.
The rear nudger roll 70 of
The exemplary embodiment illustrated in
With reference to
As the top sheet is driven to the take-away nip, a trailing edge portion of the next sheet in the sheet stack is exposed to the rear nudger roll 114. The rear nudger roll starts to rotate 116 in a direction to advance this sheet towards the separation nip; the sheet being driven by the rear nudger roll until the trailing edge of the sheet clears the rear nudger roll 118. At this point, the rear nudger roll stops rotation 120 and the feed cycle ends 122.
At the beginning of the next feed cycle, the leading edge of the top sheet will be positioned between the front nudger roll and the feeder roll. As a result, less time is required to feed consecutive sheets compared with a conventional sheet feeder without a rear nudger roll.
As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the described control sequences can be implemented using a variety of techniques, including but not limited to, a computer or micro processor control system, etc. In addition, there are various designs and methods that can be employed to manage the net normal force between the rear nudger roll and the trailing edge of the sheet stack. One approach is to vertically suspend the rear nudger assembly using a nearly zero-rate spring. The rear nudger roll sits on the trailing edge portion of the sheet stack with an approximately constant normal force, despite relative height variations inherent in controlling the sheet stack height at its leading edge.
With reference to
Another embodiment of the rear nudger roll assembly includes a conventional solenoid and solenoid linkage arrangement to unload and load the rear nudger roll relative to the sheet stack.
To illustrate the timing benefits of the present disclosure, below are some exemplary values for a conventional sheet feeder as compared to a sheet feeder incorporating a rear nudger roll as disclosed heretofore.
Assumptions:
Based on the assumptions listed above, the following chart indicates the expected performance characteristics of the respective sheet feeders.
As indicated by the chart, if the rear nudger is capable of reducing the maximum time to acquire a sheet from 0.150 s to 0.050 s, then the maximum feed rate is increased from 116 ppm to 144 ppm.
Referencing
It will be appreciated various features of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3889824 | Wood | Jun 1975 | A |
4316606 | Buys et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4372547 | Yanagawa et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4579446 | Fujino et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4587532 | Asano | May 1986 | A |
4836119 | Siraco et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4877232 | Nakanishi | Oct 1989 | A |
4928948 | Evangelista et al. | May 1990 | A |
5004222 | Dobashi | Apr 1991 | A |
5080340 | Hacknauer et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5095342 | Farrell et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5149077 | Martin et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5159395 | Farrell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5201508 | Kuo | Apr 1993 | A |
5208640 | Horie et al. | May 1993 | A |
5211388 | Walluk | May 1993 | A |
5215299 | Luft | Jun 1993 | A |
5272511 | Conrad et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5326093 | Sollitt | Jul 1994 | A |
5342037 | Martin | Aug 1994 | A |
5346199 | Martin et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5348282 | Choi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350168 | Sheridan | Sep 1994 | A |
5435540 | Martin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435544 | Mandel | Jul 1995 | A |
5473419 | Russel et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489969 | Soler et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5504568 | Saraswat et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5525031 | Fox | Jun 1996 | A |
5557367 | Yang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5568246 | Keller et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570172 | Acquaviva | Oct 1996 | A |
5596416 | Barry et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5629762 | Mahoney et al. | May 1997 | A |
5710968 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5778377 | Marlin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5884910 | Mandel | Mar 1999 | A |
5941518 | Sokac et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5995721 | Rourke et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996988 | Helmstadter et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6059284 | Wolf et al. | May 2000 | A |
6125248 | Moser | Sep 2000 | A |
6182961 | Wenth, Jr. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6241242 | Munro | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6297886 | Cornell | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328301 | Tsujii et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341773 | Aprato et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6384918 | Hubble, III et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6450711 | Conrow | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476376 | Biegelsen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476923 | Cornell | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493098 | Cornell | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537910 | Burke et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6550762 | Stoll | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554276 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6577925 | Fromherz | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607320 | Bobrow et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608988 | Conrow | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612566 | Stoll | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6612571 | Rider | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621576 | Tandon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633382 | Hubble, III et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639669 | Hubble, III et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6663097 | Bantle | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6819906 | Herrmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
20020078012 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103559 | Gartstein | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030077095 | Conrow | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040085561 | Fromherz | May 2004 | A1 |
20040085562 | Fromherz | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088207 | Fromherz | May 2004 | A1 |
20040141047 | Steinhilber et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150156 | Fromherz et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040150158 | Biegelsen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153983 | McMillan | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040216002 | Fromherz et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225391 | Fromherz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225394 | Fromherz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040247365 | Lofthus et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050280199 | Steinhilber et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060261542 | Collings | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070096385 | Mandel et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002179265 | Jun 2002 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060290047 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |