The present disclosure relates to preshrinking and preenlarging of sheets for improved image registration as applied to printing systems. It finds particular application in conjunction with overlay printing and integrated printing modules consisting of several marking engines, each having the same or different printing capabilities, and will be described with particular reference thereto. However, it is to be appreciated that the present disclosure is also amenable to other like applications.
Overlay printing is a printing method whereby a first marking engine prints content on one side of a sheet, and then a second marking engine with different capability prints complimentary content on the same side. In fact, it is possible that monochrome content, CMYK 4-color content, and custom color content could all be desired on the same side of a sheet, such that a given sheet passes through three different marking engines. When consecutively marking a sheet using multiple marking engines, the need to properly register the image content from the different marking engines becomes a factor which affects the overall quality of the printed sheet and ultimately customer satisfaction. The accuracy of registering a sheet for subsequent making can be a function of many systems, including but not limited to sheet control, sheet dimension stability and/or predictability, marking engine control, etc.
This disclosure relates to sheet dimension stability; specifically, the shrinkage or enlargement of a media sheet as it passes through a marking engine. As a sheet is passed through a first marking engine for image marking, the sheet will shrink or enlarge and thereby cause a second marking of the sheet to be misaligned. The third marking of the sheet will also be misaligned as a function of the amount the sheet shrinks or enlarges during the first and second markings. As the sheet passes through subsequent marking engines, additional sheet registration error will occur as a result of the shrinkage or enlargement of the sheet through each marking engine. Depending on the cumulative amount of shrinkage or enlargement, the finished overlay printed sheet can have a noticeable registration misalignment of images and create a lower degree of customer satisfaction with the finished product. This disclosure provides a way to compensate for the cumulative media shrinkage or enlargement discussed heretofore by sending a sheet initially through one or more non-printing cycles before commencing one or marking operations.
The following applications, the disclosures of each being totally incorporated herein by reference are mentioned:
U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/631,651, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “TIGHTLY INTEGRATED PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE MAKING USE OF COMBINED COLOR AND MONOCHROME ENGINES,” by David G. Anderson, et al.;
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/631,918, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE OPERATIONS FOR FINAL APPEARANCE AND PERMANENCE,” by David G. Anderson et al.;
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/631,921, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE OPERATIONS FOR FINAL APPEARANCE AND PERMANENCE,” by David G. Anderson et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/761,522, filed Jan. 21, 2004, entitled “HIGH RATE PRINT MERGING AND FINISHING SYSTEM FOR PARALLEL PRINTING,” by Barry P. Mandel, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/785,211, filed Feb. 24, 2004, entitled “UNIVERSAL FLEXIBLE PLURAL PRINTER TO PLURAL FINISHER SHEET INTEGRATION SYSTEM,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/881,619, filed Jun. 30, 2004, entitled “FLEXIBLE PAPER PATH USING MULTIDIRECTIONAL PATH MODULES,” by Daniel G. Bobrow.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/917,676, filed Aug. 13, 2004, entitled “MULTIPLE OBJECT SOURCES CONTROLLED AND/OR SELECTED BASED ON A COMMON SENSOR,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/917,768, filed Aug. 13, 2004, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE CONSISTING OF CONTAINERIZED IMAGE MARKING ENGINES AND MEDIA FEEDER MODULES,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,106, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH HORIZONTAL HIGHWAY AND SINGLE PASS DUPLEX,” by Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,113, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH INVERTER DISPOSED FOR MEDIA VELOCITY BUFFERING AND REGISTRATION,” by Joannes N. M. dejong, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,458, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINT SEQUENCE SCHEDULING FOR RELIABILITY,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,459, filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE USING IMAGE MARKING ENGINE MODULES (as amended),” by Barry P. Mandel, et al;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/933,556, filed Sep. 3, 2004, entitled “SUBSTRATE INVERTER SYSTEMS AND METHODS,” by Stan A. Spencer, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/953,953, filed Sep. 29, 2004, entitled “CUSTOMIZED SET POINT CONTROL FOR OUTPUT STABILITY IN A TIPP ARCHITECTURE,” by Charles A. Radulski et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/999,326, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “SEMI-AUTOMATIC IMAGE QUALITY ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPLE MARKING ENGINE. SYSTEMS,” by Robert E. Grace, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/999,450, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “ADDRESSABLE FUSING FOR AN INTEGRATED PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/000,158, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “GLOSSING SYSTEM FOR USE IN A TIPP ARCHITECTURE,” by Bryan J. Roof;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/000,168, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “ADDRESSABLE FUSING AND HEATING METHODS AND APPARATUS,” by David K. Biegelsen, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/000,258, filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “GLOSSING SYSTEM FOR USE IN A TIPP ARCHITECTURE,” by Bryan J. Roof;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/001,890, filed Dec. 2, 2004, entitled “HIGH RATE PRINT MERGING AND FINISHING SYSTEM FOR PARALLEL PRINTING,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/002,528, filed Dec. 2, 2004, entitled “HIGH RATE PRINT MERGING AND FINISHING SYSTEM FOR PARALLEL PRINTING,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/051,817, filed Feb. 4, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/069,020, filed Feb. 28, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/070,681, filed Mar. 2, 2005, entitled “GRAY BALANCE FOR A PRINTING SYSTEM OF MULTIPLE MARKING ENGINES,” by R. Enrique Viturro, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/081,473, filed Mar. 16, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Steven R. Moore;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/084,280, filed Mar. 18, 2005, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING UNIFORMITY IN IMAGES,” by Howard Mizes;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/089,854, filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled “SHEET REGISTRATION WITHIN A MEDIA INVERTER,” by Robert A. Clark et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/090,498, filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled “INVERTER WITH RETURN/BYPASS PAPER PATH,” by Robert A. Clark;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/090,502, filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled IMAGE QUALITY CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MULTIPLE MARKING ENGINE SYSTEMS,” by Michael C. Mongeon;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/093,229, filed Mar. 29, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Paul C. Julien;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/095,872, filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Paul C. Julien;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/094,864, filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Jeremy C. dejong, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/095,378, filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “IMAGE ON PAPER REGISTRATION ALIGNMENT,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/094,998, filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE WITH PARALLEL HORIZONTAL PRINTING MODULES,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/102,899, filed Apr. 8, 2005, entitled “SYNCHRONIZATION IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM,” by Lara S. Crawford, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/102,910, filed Apr. 8, 2005, entitled “COORDINATION IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM,” by Lara S. Crawford, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/102,355, filed Apr. 8, 2005, entitled “COMMUNICATION IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM,” by Markus P. J. Fromherz, et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/102,332, filed Apr. 8, 2005, entitled “ON-THE-FLY STATE SYNCHRONIZATION IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM,” by Haitham A. Hindi;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/109,558, filed Apr. 19, 2005, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING IMAGE REGISTRATION ERRORS,” by Michael R. Furst et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/109,566, filed Apr. 19, 2005, entitled “MEDIA TRANSPORT SYSTEM,” by Mandel et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/109,996, filed Apr. 20, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS,” by Michael C. Mongeon et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/115,766, Filed Apr. 27, 2005, entitled “IMAGE QUALITY ADJUSTMENT METHOD AND SYSTEM,” by Robert E. Grace;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/122,420, filed May 5, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM AND SCHEDULING METHOD,” by Austin L. Richards;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/136,821, filed May 25, 2005, entitled “AUTOMATED PROMOTION OF MONOCHROME JOBS FOR HLC PRODUCTION PRINTERS,” by David C. Robinson;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/136,959, filed May 25, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS”, by Kristine A. German et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/137,634, filed May 25, 2005, “PRINTING SYSTEM”, by Robert M. Lofthus et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/137,251, filed May 25, 2005, entitled “SCHEDULING SYSTEM”, by Robert M. Lofthus et al.;
U.S. C-I-P application Ser. No. 11/137,273, filed May 25, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM”, by David G. Anderson et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/143,818, filed Jun. 2, 2005, entitled “INTER-SEPARATION DECORRELATOR”, by Edul N. Dalal et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/146,665, filed Jun. 7, 2005, entitled “LOW COST ADJUSTMENT METHOD FOR PRINTING SYSTEMS”, by Michael C. Mongeon;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/152,275, filed Jun. 14, 2005, entitled “WARM-UP OF MULTIPLE INTEGRATED MARKING ENGINES”, by Bryan J. Roof et al.;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/156,778, filed Jun. 20, 2005, entitled “PRINTING PLATFORM”, by Joseph A. Swift;
U.S. application Ser. No. 11/157,598, filed Jun. 21, 2005, entitled “METHOD OF ORDERING JOB QUEUE OF MARKING SYSTEMS”, by Neil A. Frankel; and
Aspects of the present disclosure and embodiments thereof include a printing system and method. In one aspect of the disclosure, a printing system is provided including at least two printing system modules; at least one media sheet path interfacing the printing system modules; and a job scheduler for executing one or more printing system print jobs, the job scheduler routing a media sheet to one or more printing system modules for preshrinking or preenlarging without marking and subsequently routing the preshrunk or preenlarged media sheet to one or more printing system modules for marking.
Another aspect includes a method of printing. The method includes generating a print job to be printed using at one printing system module, and analyzing the image content of the print job and determining if the print job requires a media sheet to be marked using two or more printing system modules or the print job requires a media sheet to be marked using only one printing system module. Print jobs requiring two or more printing system modules for marking are executed by routing a media sheet to one or more printing system modules for preshrinking or preenlarging without marking, and subsequently routing the preshrunk or preenlarged media sheet to the one or more printing modules for marking. Print jobs requiring only one printing system module for marking, are executed by routing a media sheet to a printing module for marking.
Another aspect of the disclosure includes a xerographic system. The xerographic system including a media sheet feeder module and a plurality of horizontally and vertically integrated marking devices for applying images to print media. The plurality of marking engines includes a black and white marking engine, a color marking engine, and a marking engine and/or a fuser without a marking engine. A media sheet path includes a lower highway and/or an upper highway, and a return highway. The highways are integrated with the plurality of integrated marking devices, a feeder module, and a finisher module. A job scheduler executes one or more printing system print jobs, the job scheduler capable of routing a media sheet to one or more printing system modules for preshrinking or preenlarging without marking and subsequently routing the preshrunk or preenlarged media sheet to one or more printing system modules for marking. Print jobs having sheets requiring black and white printing, and color printing include a media sheet preshrinking or preenlarging process. The media sheet preshrinking or preenlarging process routes a media sheet from the sheet feeder module to a printing system module for processing the media sheet without marking. Subsequently, the preshrunk or preenlarged media sheet is routed to a printing system module for black and white marking. The media sheet is subsequently routed to another printing system module for color marking. After printing is completed the media sheet is routed to the finisher module. As an alternative, the media sheet can be routed to a color painting system module for color marking, and subsequently to a black and white printing module for black and white marking.
Printing systems including multiple xerographic marking engines have the ability to print images on one or two sides of a sheet using multiple image marking engines. The process of overlay printing is sensitive to the accurate registration of the media sheet as it is marked by multiple image marking engines. A significant factor affecting the media sheet registration, relative to multiple marking engines, is the dimensional stability of the media sheet as it is processed through the multiple image marking engines.
The detailed description which follows describes a printing system which preshrinks media sheets prior to subsequent image marking for improved image registration. The exemplary embodiments described relate to the media sheets that shrink as they pass through an image marking engine or fuser. However, the exemplary embodiments described are equally applicable to media sheets that enlarge as they pass through an image marking engine or fuser.
With reference to
To obtain media sheet shrinkage data, a paper sheet was fed into the sheet feed 6 and routed through the transfuse nip 10. The transfuse nip 10 includes a pressure roll 8 and a heated fuser roll 12. After passing through the transfuse nip 10, the paper sheet traveled along the sheet path 4 indicated in
The graphical illustrations of media sheet shrinkage as a function of transfuse nip passes establish that a majority of the cumulative media shrinkage can be compensated by routing a media sheet initially through one or more non-printing marking engines and subsequently marking the media sheet with a plurality of marking engines.
In addition to the discussion heretofore, the graphs of
Referencing
Those of skill in the art will appreciate other combinations of preshrinking process passes through the fusing nip of a non-printing marking engine before routing the preshrunk media sheet to a series of marking engines for overlay printing. The greater the number of preshrinking passes through the fusing nip, the smaller the amount of registration error during the subsequent image marking processes because the dimensional stability of the media sheet increase. However, the lesser the amount of preshrinking passes through the fusing nip, the greater the process efficiency of the overall printing system.
With reference to
To provide printing flexibility and overlay printing ability, the exemplary embodiment of
Referencing
Referencing
Referencing
It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4579446 | Fujino et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4587532 | Asano | May 1986 | A |
| 4836119 | Siraco et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 5004222 | Dobashi | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5080340 | Hacknauer et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5095342 | Farrell et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5159395 | Farrell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5208640 | Horie et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5272511 | Conrad et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5326093 | Sollitt | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5435544 | Mandel | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5473419 | Russel et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5489969 | Soler et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5504568 | Saraswat et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5525031 | Fox | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5557367 | Yang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5568246 | Keller et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570172 | Acquaviva | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5596416 | Barry et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5629762 | Mahoney et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5710968 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5778377 | Marlin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5884910 | Mandel | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5995721 | Rourke et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6059284 | Wolf et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6125248 | Moser | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6241242 | Munro | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6297886 | Cornell | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6341773 | Aprato et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6384918 | Hubble, III et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6450711 | Conrow | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6476376 | Biegelsen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6476923 | Cornell | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6493098 | Cornell | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6537910 | Burke et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6550762 | Stoll | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6554276 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6577925 | Fromherz | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6607320 | Bobrow et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6608988 | Conrow | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6612566 | Stoll | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6612571 | Rider | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6621576 | Tandon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6633382 | Hubble, III et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6639669 | Hubble, III et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6819906 | Herrmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 20020078012 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103559 | Gartstein | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131800 | Jacob et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030077095 | Conrow | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20040085561 | Fromherz | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040085562 | Fromherz | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088207 | Fromherz | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040150156 | Fromherz et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040150158 | Biegelsen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153983 | McMillan | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040216002 | Fromherz et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225391 | Fromherz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225394 | Fromherz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040247365 | Lofthus et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070024894 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |