Printing systems and methods using keyless inking and continuous dampening

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6951174
  • Patent Number
    6,951,174
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 15, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 4, 2005
    19 years ago
Abstract
Keyless inking and dampening systems and methods are disclosed which employ application, subtractive and dampening roller systems to control the ink/dampening fluid film on the form roller. A clean-up roller removes residual ink from non-image areas on the printing plate.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The field of the invention is inking systems and methods for printing presses for uniformly applying ink and/or dampening fluid to the printing plates and removing unwanted ink from the printing plates, especially from non-image areas.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

An offset printing press typically includes a plate cylinder carrying one or more printing plates. The printing plates have oleophilic surfaces defining an image area, and hydrophilic surfaces defining a non-image area. An inker applies ink to the printing plate which collects on the oleophilic surfaces to form an image which can be transferred to a blanket cylinder which transfers the image to media. Dampening solution may be applied to non-image areas. By transferring the image from the printing plate onto a blanket roller, and then onto the media, the printing plate does not directly print the image on the media, hence the term offset printing.


The inker applies ink carried on one or more form rollers to the printing plate. When the form roller in the inker engages the printing plate, the ink film on the form roller contacting image areas on the printing plate is split such that approximately one-half of the thickness of the ink film is applied to the image area of the printing plate leaving approximately one-half the ink on the form roller that never recovers its original ink film thickness on the printed, ink depleted areas causing a condition referred to as starvation. The ink film on the form roller contacting non-image areas on the printing plate remains on the form roller causing a condition called accumulation.


This combination of accumulation and starvation results in undesirable “ghosted” images and image repeats being formed on the final printed product. In order to minimize this problem, many conventional inkers include a plurality of form rollers (for example, four) which each apply a small amount.


The printed product is monitored to determine when ink density has degraded beyond an acceptable level. In order to control the quality of the printing, conventional printer inkers also include a plurality of adjustable keys to control the amount of ink being applied to the form roller. These keys require constant adjustment to maintain the quality of the printed product.


Keyless inking systems are generally known in the prior art. Some prior art keyless systems have attempted to solve “ghosting,” starvation, and accumulation problems in keyless inking systems employing single or multiple form rollers. However, these solutions have not been completely successful in solving these problems.


U.S. Patent Publication No. US2001/0032559, to Price et al, published on Oct. 25, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,672,211, discloses “Inking Systems for Printing Presses.” The content of this application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Embodiments disclosed in this patent publication include keyless inking systems with one relatively large form roller for applying ink to a printing plate. Ink is applied to the form roller by an applicator roller having an ink carrying surface and a variable speed drive. The form roller and plate cylinder are rotated at the same rpm while the speed of the applicator roller is varied to vary the amount of ink applied to the form roller. A subtractive roller system removes excess ink from the form roller. For wash-up, the press drive and form roller are disengaged and the inking system is rotated by an inker roller drive while wash-up fluid is applied to the inking system.


The systems of U.S. Patent Publication No. US2001/0032559 work well under some printing conditions using some conventional inks. Under other conditions, some improvement is possible. For example, some undesirable “tinting” in the non-image areas has been observed to occur when the system is used with some standard inks formulated for multiple form roll applications.


It is known in the printing arts to treat a printing plate so that hydrophilic, non-printing areas thereof are treated with a dampening fluid. Two general types of dampening systems are known: contacting and non-contacting. With the inker, a non-contacting spray brush or spray head system may be used in which the dampening fluid travels from a source or reservoir through a gap from the spray brush or spray head to a form or transfer roller within the inker. Such systems are typically used in lithographic systems for printing newspapers. In such systems an emulsion of ink and dampening fluid may be formed, and ink feedback into the dampening fluid reservoir may occur.


Dampening systems that are in physical contact with the inking system, especially in contact with the inker form roller, during the printing process are referred to as continuous duty dampeners. The dampening systems that incorporate a non-contact dampening fluid spray brush or spray head that sprays dampening fluid into the inker are referred to as non-continuous duty dampeners.


Keyless inking has been proposed for use in newspaper printing in combination with the use of spray brush or spray head dampening. Newspaper printers have generally avoided continuous dampening for a number of reasons, including the fact that the standard and keyless inking systems have no means of preventing uncontrollable accumulation of ink and fountain solution in the inkers resulting in lost color control and ink feedback into the dampening fluid reservoir.


SUMMARY OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The inking systems disclosed herein employ at least one form roller in contact with the printing plate cylinder. Another roller may contact the plate and remove residual ink from non-image areas of the plate surface. A subtractive roller system, which contacts the at least one form roller, removes excess ink and dampening solution from the form roller after printing. An applicator roller then applies the necessary ink film to maintain desired color to the form roller. A continuous duty dampening system then continuously resupplies the required amount of dampening fluid as required by the ink film on the form roller.


Preferred embodiments of the present invention include a printing system having a rotating plate cylinder carrying a printing plate and a main form roller for applying ink to the printing plate. In accordance with this aspect of the invention the plate cylinder and the form roller are rotated at the same rpm so that the same areas on the form roller contact the same areas on the printing plate during each revolution of the plate cylinder. The plate cylinder and the form roller are configured to have somewhat different diameters and, thus, have different surface speeds at a nip formed there between. A residual ink removing roller also contacts the printing plate. In preferred embodiments, this roller has a diameter less than half that of the main form roller. The system is equipped with the keyless, subtractive inking system and a continuous duty, dampener system. In operation the system is capable of producing a desired uniform ink film on the image area of the plate cylinder and a film of dampening fluid in the non-image areas with essentially no tinting, ghosting, repeats, accumulation and starvation.


Other preferred embodiments of the present invention include systems for engaging and disengaging various of the rollers for different printing, clean-up and wash up modes.


More particularly, preferred embodiments of the present invention relate to an inking system for a printing system including a plate cylinder and, optionally, a blanket cylinder and impression cylinder. The inking system includes a large form roller rotationally contacting the printing plate at a nip and for applying ink to the printing plate. In preferred embodiments substantially all of the ink and dampening fluid applied to the printing plate is applied by this form roller. A secondary roller or clean-up roller, relatively smaller than the form roller, also rotationally contacts the printing plate at a nip located between the nip formed by the form roller and the application of ink to the blanket cylinder. The diameter of the secondary roller is substantially smaller than the diameter of the form roller. The clean-up roller removes residual ink and dampening fluid from non-image areas of the printing plate cylinder after ink has been applied to the printing plate by the form roller. An applicator roller rotationally contacts the main form roller for applying ink to the form roller. A continuous duty dampening system, including a dampener transfer roller in rotating pressural contact with the form roller, then applies a required amount of dampening fluid to the ink film on the form roller. After the inked, dampened form roller contacts the plate cylinders, an ink subtractive system including at least one roller rotationally contacts the form roller for removing excess ink and dampening fluid from the form roller.


In preferred embodiments the clean-up roller is friction driven at the speed of the printing system. The inking system advantageously includes a vibrator roller located so that the clean-up roller rotationally contacts the vibrator roller and the vibrator roller rotationally contacts the form roller, thus providing a path for fluid transfer between the form roller and the clean-up roller.


In other preferred embodiments the form roller and the clean-up roller have resilient coverings. The form roller may have approximately the same diameter as the plate cylinder. The radius of the clean-up roller is less than half the radius of the main form roller. Advantageously, the plate cylinder and the form roller are rotated at about the same rpm so that the same areas on the form roller contact the same areas on the at least one printing plate during each revolution of the plate cylinder; and the plate cylinder and the main form roller have slightly different diameters such that they have surface speeds at a nip formed between the plate cylinder and the form roller which differ by greater than one foot per minute. The difference in surface speeds at the nip formed between the plate cylinder and the form roller is preferably between four and ten feet per minute.


The inking system of preferred embodiments of the present invention includes a fluid subtractive system rather than ink and dampening fluid accumulation systems used in many prior art systems. This system may employ a resilient-surfaced transfer roller engaging the main form roller for removing excess ink from the form roller; a hard surfaced subtractive roller engaging the transfer roller for receiving excess from the transfer roller; and a scraper blade adjacent the subtractive roller for scraping excess ink from the subtractive roller.


The foregoing is intended to provide a convenient summary of the present disclosure.


Various objects and features will be apparent from this application including the accompanying drawings. One or more objects and advantages (but not necessarily all) may be achieved by the various aspects and embodiments of the present invention as herein described.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Drawings of preferred embodiments of the invention are annexed hereto so that the invention may be better and more fully understood.



FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a printing press having keyless inkers mounted thereon.



FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic view of a printing assembly with a keyless subtractive inker as shown in FIG. 9 of U.S. Patent Publication No. US2001/0032559.



FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic view of a printing assembly of a preferred embodiment of the present invention in a first mode of operation. FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) are details of the apparatus of FIG. 3.



FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic view of the printing assembly of FIG. 3 in a second mode of operation.



FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic view of the printing assembly of FIG. 3 in a third mode of operation.



FIG. 6 is a diagrammatic view of the printing assembly of FIG. 3 in a fourth mode of operation.



FIG. 7 is a diagrammatic view of a newspaper inker in accordance with an alternate embodiment of the present invention



FIG. 7
a is a detail showing an alternative system for use in the embodiment of FIG. 7.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIG. 1 of the drawings, the numeral 10 generally designates an offset printing press having a plurality of printing assemblies 11 for sequentially applying different color inks to media 13, such as paper, plastic, metal and the like, to produce a multi-colored printed product. The ink may be conventional ink, and as referred to herein, can also include a mixture of a conventional ink and dampening fluid.


Each printing assembly 11 includes a plate cylinder 12 carrying one or more printing plate 14 containing an image for printing on the media. The image (which may include text, graphics, pictures, etc.) is formed by image areas on the plate 14. The image areas receive ink from the inker 21 while the non-image areas are kept free of ink. These functions are performed by at least two rollers: a relatively large form roller 15 and a relatively smaller clean-up roller 17, each of which engages the plate cylinder 12.


Ink is applied to the printing plate 14 by the inker 21 to form a transferable inked image thereon corresponding to the image areas on the printing plate 14. The plate cylinder 12 may be rotated to engage the printing plate 14 with a rotatably mounted blanket cylinder 16, and transfer the inked image onto the blanket cylinder 16. The blanket cylinder 16 may then transfer the inked image to the media 13 which is pinched between the blanket cylinder 16 and an impression cylinder 19. A transfer cylinder 23 adjacent the impression cylinder 19 may be used to facilitate the transfer of the media 13 to an adjacent printing assembly 11 for applying a different color image to the media 13. A contacting, continuous duty dampener system 22 is provided to apply a desired amount of dampening fluid to the large form roller 15.


A printing assembly described in U.S. Patent Publication No. US2001/0032559 is shown in FIG. 2. The embodiment as shown in FIG. 2 has one form roller and a subtractive roller system.


The printing assembly 100 includes a plate cylinder 102 and an inking system 104. In a printing process, one or more printing assemblies may be used to produce single or multi-color printed product. In the process an ink and/or a coating is applied by each of the printing assemblies. In offset printing, the plate cylinder 102 is rotated to engage one or more removable printing plates 106 with a rotatably mounted blanket cylinder 108. The blanket cylinder 108 then transfers inked image(s) to the media which is pinched between the blanket cylinder 108 [a portion of which is shown in FIG. 2] and an impression cylinder [such as shown in FIG. 1]. Sequential adjacent printing assemblies may be used for applying coatings or different color images to the media as previously described in connection with FIG. 1.


The inking system 104 may include a keyless, subtractive inking system using a form roller 110. The plate cylinder and the form roller have different diameters and have different surface speeds at a nip 112 formed between the plate cylinder and the form roller. The differential speed produces sharper printed images and tends to remove debris from the plate surface. It also tends to eliminate repeats and inker related streaks produced by conventional inkers. Advantageously, the difference in surface speeds at the nip 112 is greater than one foot per minute, for example, between four and ten feet per minute, as taught in the above-mentioned patent publication.


In preferred embodiments, the plate cylinder 102 and the form roller may be rotated at the same rpm, so that the same areas on the form roller contact the same areas on printing plate(s) 106 during each revolution of the plate cylinder. This may be accomplished by appropriate selection of conventional drives, for example, the chain coupled drive 114 and drive motor 116 shown in FIG. 2.


The rotation of the form roller and plate cylinder at the same rotational speed eliminates repeats or ghostings caused by a lack of registration between surfaces of the printing plate and the form roller. By employing the above described techniques, registration between the surfaces of the printing plate and the main form roller is achieved, thus minimizing this kind of ghosting and repeating. It will be understood, however, that such a system may cause a more rapid build up of ink and/or dampening fluid in areas on the main form roller. This problem may be addressed by use of a subtractive system.


The difference in surface speeds is achieved by employing somewhat different radii for the form roller 110 and plate cylinder 102. These radii are represented in FIG. 2 as RF and RP, respectively. Examples of these radii are RF=7.820 inches and RP=8.000 inches. Employing a form roller of comparable size to the plate cylinder results in a form roller larger than would normally be found in conventional inking systems using multiple form rollers. Accordingly, maintaining the form roller may create difficulties due to its size and the difficulty of removing such a large cylinder from the system for repair. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the form roller 110 has a removable covering 118 held in position by quick release mechanisms 120. A permanent, resilient under-layer 122 may also be employed.


The keyless subtractive inking system 104 of FIG. 2 will now be described. The inking system includes the form roller 110, an ink subtractive subsystem 124, an ink application subsystem 126 and an ink source such as a common ink reservoir 128.


The ink application system 126 may include an applicator roller 130 and a doctor blade 132. Ink on the applicator roller 130 is deposited on the form roller at nip 134. In preferred embodiments, the applicator roller 130 may be ceramic anilox roll of a type conventionally used in printing applications. The surface may be formed with ink carrying cells. Different application results may be produced by judicious selection of cell counts and cell depths. An example of a surface usable in the present invention has a cell count of 200 and cell depth of 35.64 μm.


In use, ink 142 maintained in the ink reservoir flows downward to ink fountain 144. The wiper blade 132 meters ink from the reservoir onto the applicator roller 130. Ink at the fountain is picked up by the applicator roller 130 and deposited onto the form roller 110.


The applicator roller 130 may be driven to rotate by a variable speed driver. The driver may be a variable speed motor, variable gear or belt drive or the equivalent. Varying the rotational speed of the applicator roller may be used to vary the amount of ink applied to the form roller, and ultimately the amount of ink applied to the printed media.


With continued reference again to FIG. 2, the ink subtractive system 124 may include a transfer roller 147 with a resilient surface or cover 148. The surface of the transfer roller contacts the surface of the form roller 110 at nip 150. Both surfaces move in the same direction at the nip 150 as shown by the circumferential arrows associated with the rolls. A subtractive roller 152 adjacent the transfer roller 147 receives excess ink from the transfer roller. The transfer roller 147 may be driven to oscillate in the direction of the axis 154 of rotation of the transfer roller 147 which is perpendicular to the plane of the figure. Such oscillation helps to prepare or “rough-up” the ink prior to subtraction. Vibrating roller 156 serves a similar purpose. Ink is removed from the subtractive roller 152 by blade 157.


The subtractive roller 152 may be driven to rotate by a variable speed driver. The driver may be a variable speed motor, variable gear or belt drive or the equivalent. Varying the rotational speed of the subtractive roller may be used to vary the amount of ink removed from roller after printing.


The system of FIG. 2 includes a contacting, continuous duty dampening system 158. When printing in a wet offset printing mode, a dampening system, such as, for example, the type commercially available from Epic Products International Corporation of Arlington, Tex., can be provided for applying a precisely metered film of dampening fluid to the surface of ink carried on the form roller 110. Such a dampener may comprise a pan 160 for containing the dampening fluid 161, and a resilient covered pan roller 162 pressure indented with a hydrophilic chrome roller 168, then rotated by a variable speed motor [not shown] to apply the necessary dampening fluid to the surface of the resilient covered form roller 110.


The apparatus of FIG. 2 is particularly well adapted for practicing efficient wash-up procedures, as now will be described. Assume first that the inking system 104 has been used to apply ink to the plate cylinder 102 as previously described. In a wash-up procedure, the form roller 110 may be disengaged from the plate cylinder 102. This permits rotation of the inking system rollers independently of the rotation of the press drive. While wash-up is performed, the plate cylinder may be accessed to clean and/or replace the plate for subsequent printing operations. A mechanism for disengaging the form roller and the plate cylinder is indicated schematically at 170. It may be constructed using conventional clutch and gearing mechanisms.


With continued reference to FIG. 2, during wash-up, excess ink may be removed from the ink reservoir 128. Alternatively, a removable ink unit 172 may be removed and replaced with the wash-up assembly. A conventional ink solvent or wash-up fluid may then be applied to the inking system. In one embodiment, the fluid may be applied to the applicator roller 130 using the spray bar 174. Alternatively or in addition, wash-up fluid may be sprayed on other of the rollers in the inking system. As the rollers of the inking system are rotated, a mixture of the wash-up fluid and residual ink on the rollers is gradually deposited in the reservoir. This mixture can be emptied or wiped up to complete the wash-up and prepare the system for charging with a new ink supply.


The wash-up process proceeds essentially automatically and harnesses the ink subtraction system to remove and collect the mixture. The wash-up procedure may be performed using a smaller amount of wash-up fluid relative to conventional wash-up processes, with consequential material savings and environmental benefits. Because the inking system is disengaged from the press drive and plate cylinder during wash-up, maintenance can be simultaneously performed on the press, plates may be cleaned and replaced, etc.



FIG. 3 illustrates the printing assembly of FIG. 2, modified in accordance with aspects of the present invention to improve inker performance. The printing assembly 200 is particularly adapted for producing high quality, multi-colored sheet fed products. As in the embodiment of FIG. 2 a large or main resilient form roller 202 and plate cylinder 204 are employed. However, an additional roller 206, directly contacting the plate cylinder, is provided. This roller is a clean-up or residual ink removal roller. Both rollers 202 and 206 have a resilient covering (as indicated by the hatched rings in FIGS. 3 through 6). Preferably the covering materials are BUNA “N” for conventional inks, EPDM for U.V. inks. The clean-up roller 206 is shown in FIG. 3 as rotationally contacting the vibrator roller 208. Vibrator roller 208, in turn, engages the large or main form roller 202.


In preferred embodiments, the form roller 202 and plate cylinder 204 are rotated at the same rotational speed (rpm) but at different surface speeds to facilitate elimination of repeats or ghostings caused by a lack of registration between surfaces of the printing plate and the form roller. The difference in surface speeds is achieved by employing somewhat different radii to the form roller 202 and plate cylinder 204. These radii are represented in FIG. 3 as RF and Rp, respectively. Examples of these radii are RF=7.820 inches and Rp=8.000 inches. On the other hand, the clean-up roller 206 has a significantly smaller radius Rc, typically less than half the radius of the form roller 202. For example, a clean-up roller 206 with a radius Rc of 3 inches may be used with the form roller described above with a radius RF of 7.820 inches and a plate cylinder with a radius Rp of 8.000 inches.


The system of FIG. 3 employs an ink subtractive subsystem 210, an ink applicator subsystem 212, a common ink reservoir 214 and a dampening system 216 such as shown and described in connection with FIG. 2.


The ink subtractive system 210 may include a resilient-surfaced transfer roller 218 which engages the form roller 202 and removes excess ink therefrom. The transfer roller 218 transfers the removed ink to a smooth ceramic subtractive roller 220. Ink is removed from the subtractive roller 220 by blade 222 which may form part of an ink reservoir. In this way, removed ink and dampening fluid emulsion is returned to the ink fountain for reuse. Alternatively, ink or ink and washup solution mixture may be removed by the subtractive system and pumped to a remote application system or discarded.


The ink application system 212 may include an application roller 224 driven to rotate in contact with the form roller 202. In one embodiment the application roller is an Anilox roller with a surface formed with non-interconnected, ink carrying cells. In another embodiment the application roller is formed with a continuous helical groove on its outer surface for carrying ink. Such a roller with groove 225 is shown in perspective in the detail of FIG. 3(a). The pitch of the groove (dimension d) may be, for example, 200 line CBM.


The driver for the application roller may be a variable speed motor, variable gear or belt drive or the equivalent. A wiper blade 226 may be used to meter the ink from the reservoir 214 onto the applicator roller 224. A vibrator roller 228 may be used to enhance the quality of the ink film applied by the application roller.


The printing system of FIG. 3 may also optionally include a dampening system 216. When printing in a wet offset printing mode, a dampening system, such, such as the one described in connection with FIG. 2, is employed, including a chrome roller 230 and metering roller 232.


In operation, ink from the application system 212 is supplied to form an ink film on the form roller 202. Ink is deposited on the image areas of the printing plate. The clean-up roller may have an ink film initially supplied by the large form roller 202 through vibrator roller 208, which has approximately the same ink film thickness as the ink film carried by the image areas of the plate cylinder after the plate has contacted the form roller. Under the known rules of ink transfer, little or no ink will be transferred from the clean-up roller to the image areas of the plate. However, if residual ink is present in the non-image areas of the printing plate in the form of tinting, the residual ink will be attracted to the thicker film on the clean-up roller 206 and removed from such non-image areas.


Following the clean-up roller nip, the ink film is deposited on the blanket cylinder 234 and, subsequently, to the sheet or web being printed. Following inking of the plate, ink film on the large form roller is again subjected, first, to the action of the subtractive roller system 210 and then receives a further application of ink by the ink application system 212.



FIG. 3
b illustrates a detail of a preferred embodiment of the system of FIG. 3. In FIG. 3b the applicator roller 224 is shown in contact with the wiper blade 226 which is used to meter ink from the reservoir 214. An ink level is shown at 250. The wiper blade has a line of contact with a cylindrical surface of the applicator roller. The wiper blade may be inclined downwardly at an acute angle θ with respect to the tangent T to the cylindrical surface of the applicator roller at the line of contact between the wiper blade and the cylindrical surface. Ink is removed from the subtractive roller 220 by the blade 222 which forms a part of the ink reservoir 214 as described above. A blade retainer 252 holds the blades 222 and 226.


In operation it has been noted that the rotational motion of the applicator roller 224 can cause the ink at the wiper blade 226 to form a rotating cylindrical volume which backs away from the applicator roller 224 causing ink starvation, particularly when the ink level in the reservoir is low. To overcome this problem, a baffle 254 may be provided. The baffle extends the length of the applicator roller (i.e., in a direction perpendicular to the plane of FIG. 3b). As shown, the baffle 254 prevents the rotating cylindrical volume of ink 256 from backing-away from the applicator roller 224, thereby preventing ink starvation. Advantageously, the baffle is adjustable in the vertical direction by means of an adjustment member 258, which permits the baffle to be located at a position which maintains good ink contact above the blade 226.



FIGS. 3 through 6 illustrate several modes of operation of the system first described in connection with FIG. 3. That system employs mechanisms for selectively engaging and disengaging various of the system rollers to achieve various results as described below. In FIGS. 3 through 6, the engagement systems are shown as implemented with four air cylinders and various cammed actuators for displacing axes of rotation of various rollers with respect to one another. It will be understood that various mechanical, hydraulic and electronic systems may be employed to achieve similar results.


As shown by comparing FIGS. 3 and 4, a first air cylinder 236 may be used to disengage vibrator roller 208 from the form roller 202. In this optional configuration, the clean-up roller 206 remains in contact with the printing plate 203 carried by the plate cylinder 204. In some printing operations with some inks, a better printed copy may be produced by this arrangement which eliminates ink transfer between the form roller 202 and clean-up roller 206 through the vibrator roller 208. In addition, the surface of the film of ink on the form roller 202 is no longer acted on by the vibrator roller 208 prior to being subjected to the subtractive transfer roller 218.


As shown in FIG. 5, a second air cylinder 238 may be used to disengage the clean-up roller 206 from the plate cylinder, while the vibrator roller 208 remains in contact with the form roller 202. In some applications this may provide adequate printing. In this arrangement the vibrator roller is used to create a knap on the ink film carried by the form roller, which may make it easier for the subtractive transfer roller 218 to remove excess ink therefrom.


As shown in FIG. 6, a third air cylinder 240 may be used to disengage the form roller 202 and clean-up roller from the plate cylinder 204. In this configuration, wash up may be performed as discussed above. Wash up fluid may be sprayed on the applicator roller 224 using the spray head 242. Ink and wash-up fluid mixture may be removed from the system including the clean-up roller 206 by the subtractive system and collected in a wash-up reservoir 244 which is used in place of the ink reservoir. Since the form roller and clean-up rollers are disengaged from the rest of the press, the plate cylinder may be wiped or “gummed” as wash-up proceeds. The blanket cylinder 234 may also be washed at this time.


A fourth air cylinder 246 may be used to disengage the chrome roller 230 of the dampening system from the form roller during clean-up or during printing operations not using dampening.



FIG. 7 is a diagrammatic view of an offset, lithographic printing system 300 such as may be used for newspaper printing illustrating another embodiment of the present invention. The system includes a plate cylinder 302 and blanket cylinder 304 for printing on a continuous web 306.


The inking system in FIG. 7 includes a press-driven large or main form roller 308 and may further include a clean-up roller 310, both of which contact one or more printing plates carried by the plate cylinder 302 to form a uniform film of ink and dampening fountain solution to the image areas of the plate. A vibrating transfer roller 312 engages both the clean-up roller 310 and the form roller 308 as shown. The form roller 308 and the clean-up roller 310 have a resilient covering. An additional vibrating roller 326 is provided to condition the ink and dampening fountain solution film prior to its application to the printing plate.


Ink is applied to the form roller 308 by an applicator roller 313 through a vibrating transfer roller 314. The applicator roller may be an anilox roller with ink carrying cells or a roller with ink-carrying helical grooves. The speed of the applicator roller 313 may be controlled by the variable speed controller 319 to vary the speed of the roller with respect to press speed. The ink on the applicator roller is metered by a scraper blade 316. An automatic ink supply tube 317 provides fresh ink to the inker.


Ink is removed from the form roller 308 by a vibrating, variable drive subtractive roller 318 which, advantageously, has a smooth ceramic surface. The speed of the subtractive roller may be controlled by variable speed controller 321 to vary the speed of the roller with respect to press speed. Ink and dampening fluid may be removed from the subtractive roller by a scraper blade 320 and recirculated to the applicator roller. Together the blades 316 and 320 form a blade assembly which is readily adjusted or replaced.


Dampening is provided by chrome (hydrophilic) transfer roller 322 and metering roller 324. A dampener solution spray tube 328 provides fresh dampening fluid (solution) to the dampening system. A catch pan 330 catches excess dampening fluid.


The relative sizes and speeds of the plate cylinder 302, main form roller 308 and clean-up roller 310 are similar to that discussed above in connection with the embodiment of FIG. 3. In operation a uniform film of ink and dampening fluid are applied to the printing plate by the main form roller 308 and residual ink and dampening fluid are removed from non-image areas by the clean-up roller 310.


An alternative blade assembly is shown in FIG. 7a in which the blade 320 has been lengthened and the blades reoriented. Newspaper stock (paper) presents a fiber lint problem. In the assembly of FIG. 7(a) the fiber lint may collect at the nip of blade 320 and subtractive roller 318 which is desirable. In the assembly of FIG. 7, the fiber lint will not collect at the nip of blade 320 and subtractive roll 318, but eventually ends up in the center of the rotating ink at the nip of blade 316 and applicator roll 313 might cause the eventual build-up of paper fiber lint in the cells or spiral grooves of the applicator roll 313. The blade assembly of FIG. 7 has the advantage that its structure and adjustments for blades 316 and 320 are less complicated because both blades are scraper blades. In contrast, in the system of FIG. 7A, blade 316 is a scraper blade and blade 320 is a wiper blade.


It will be understood that in the system of FIG. 7, a point on the surface of the form roller sequentially contacts in the following order: the plate cylinder; vibrating transfer roller 312, the subtractive roller 318, the distributor roller 314 of the ink application system and the chrome transfer roller 322 of the dampening system and vibrating roller 326. This order of contact is preferred. The same order of contact occurs in other disclosed embodiments although the specific location of the rollers and the use of transfer rollers differs. As in FIG. 7, the application roller 313 and subtractive roller 318 may be located adjacent each other with a reservoir for receiving subtracted ink/dampening fluid from the subtractive roller for reuse by the application roller system. To facilitate this arrangement one of the application and subtractive rollers may be located in direct rotational contact with the form roller and the other located in fluid communication with the form roller through a transfer roller.


In operation the system of FIG. 7 may be used for keyless inking in high speed web, two-sided newspaper printing and high speed, two-sided web commercial printing. It will be understood that for two sided printing a second printing unit similar to that shown in FIG. 7 may be disposed so that blanket cylinder thereof is in contact with the opposite side of the web 306. For example, in such a system, the second printing unit may be mirror image of the one shown in FIG. 7 in terms of roller placement and directions of rotation. Alternatively, a second printing unit, similar to that shown in FIG. 3 may be located above the printing unit shown in FIG. 7 with the blanket cylinder thereof in contact with the opposite side of the web 306. These high speed web, two-sided printing systems use continuous duty dampening rather than the intermittent spray or brush systems preferred in the prior art. In such a system, water (and appropriate additives), is used as the dampening fluid. High speed printing includes printing at about 500 feet of web per minute or above.


Applicants believe that the dampening fluid (e.g., water) should form a controlled emulsion with the ink film on the form roller. The ink by chemical composition will accept a certain fixed amount of water, for example, 40% (this is the working water volume for this ink). Additional water will cause uncontrollable emulsification and reduce print quality. The keyless inker systems disclosed here with their subtractive subsystems work well in combination with continuous duty dampeners to obviate this problem.


The uniform ink film required for quality printing is provided each revolution of the form roller by the processes of addition and subtraction. The dampener applicator roller (the chrome roll) is in pressural contact with the desired ink film on the form roller and supplies to the film the amount of dampening fluid (e.g., water) which the film will accept. Water is not stacked on the surface of the ink. Excess dampening fluid, with ink feedback, is returned to the dampener pan applicator (the chrome roll) and metering roll nip.


The ink removed from the form roller during each revolution by the subtractive system contains dampening fluid. When fresh ink is added the proportion of dampening fluid drops. The ink film on the form roller as it approaches the dampener applicator roller may have a dampener fluid content less than optimum, e.g., 25%. The continuous duty dampener then supplies the additional amount of dampening fluid to bring the proportion of dampening fluid in the ink film back to the optimum level. Excess dampening fluid returns to the dampener pan applicator (the chrome roll) and metering roll nip. In this way the printing plate(s) are effectively inked and dampened for each printing cycle.


Aspects and features of embodiments of the present invention have been discussed with reference to certain illustrated examples and embodiments. The invention to be protected is, however, defined by the following claims and is not to be regarded as limited by aspects or features not recited in the claims. It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An inking and dampening system for a printing press having a rotating plate cylinder carrying at least one printing plate, comprising: a form roller rotationally contacting the plate cylinder for applying ink to the at least one printing plate; a clean-up roller rotationally contacting the plate cylinder for removing residual ink from non-image areas of the at least one printing plate after ink has been applied to the printing plate by the form roller; an applicator roller system for providing ink to the form roller; an ink subtractive roller system for removing ink from the form roller after printing; and a dampening roller rotationally contacting the form roller for applying dampening fluid to the form roller.
  • 2. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 wherein a variable speed controller controls the speed of an applicator roller of the applicator roller system.
  • 3. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 wherein a variable speed controller controls the speed of a subtractive roller of the subtractive roller system.
  • 4. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 wherein one of the applicator and subtractive roller systems includes a transfer roller in direct contact with the form roller.
  • 5. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 wherein the dampening roller is hydrophilic.
  • 6. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 wherein the printing press is a newspaper printing press employing blanket cylinders to print on both sides of a high speed continuous web.
  • 7. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 wherein ink and dampening fluid are removed from the form roller by the subtractive roller system and wherein said removed ink and dampening fluid are recirculated to the applicator roller system.
  • 8. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 wherein the dampening roller is a hydrophilic chrome transfer roller and further comprising a metering roller in rotational contact with the hydrophilic chrome roller for metering dampening fluid to the hydrophilic chrome roller.
  • 9. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 further comprising a vibrator roller which rotationally contacts the clean-up roller and the form roller and acts as a bridge roller therebetween.
  • 10. The ink and dampening system of claim 1 in which the applicator roller system includes a vibrating roller located generally below the form roller which contacts the surface of the form roller at a location between the subtractive roller and the dampening roller.
  • 11. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 in which the subtractive roller system removes an emulsion of ink and water from the form roller.
  • 12. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 wherein the dampening roller supplies additional dampening fluid to the form roller in an amount which an ink/dampening fluid film on the form roller can accept without forming a layer of excess water on the film.
  • 13. The inking and dampening system of claim 1 wherein the ink subtractive system comprises: a hard surfaced subtractive roller driven by a variable speed drive, which subtractive roller receives excess ink and dampening fluid from the form roller; and a scraper blade adjacent the subtractive roller for scraping excess ink and dampening from the subtractive roller.
  • 14. A method for inking and dampening one or more printing plates on a rotating plate cylinder comprising: supplying ink to a form roller with an applicator roller system in contact with the form roller; supplying dampening fluid to the form roller with a dampening roller system in contact with the form roller; transferring an ink and dampening solution to the rotating printing plate at a nip between the form roller and the printing plate; and removing excess ink and dampening fluid from the form roller at a nip between the form roller and a subtractive roller system.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein the steps are performed during each rotation of the form roller in the order recited.
  • 16. The method of claim 14 further comprising the step of removing residual ink from non-image areas of the printing plate with a clean-up roller in rotating contact with the printing plate.
  • 17. The method of claim 14 wherein the speed of the applicator roller system is varied with respect to press speed.
  • 18. The method of claim 14 wherein the speed of the subtractive roller system is varied with respect to press speed.
  • 19. The method of claim 14 wherein the subtractive roller system collects an emulsion of ink and dampening fluid which is recirculated to the applicator roller system for reapplication to the form roller.
  • 20. The method of claim 14 wherein an emulsion of ink and dampening fluid in excess of that applied to form roller by the dampening roller system is collected for reuse in the dampening system.
  • 21. The method of claim 14 wherein the dampening roller system includes a hydrophilic roller in pressural contact with the form roller which supplies additional dampening fluid in an amount which a film ink/dampening fluid film on the form roller can accept without forming a layer of excess water on the film.
  • 22. The method of claim 21 wherein the dampening roller is a chrome roller.
  • 23. A form roller inking and dampening system in which a resilient material covered form roller is sequentially rotationally contacted by an application roller system including a roller for applying additional ink to the form roller; a dampening roller system including a dampening roller for applying additional dampening fluid to the form roller; a plate cylinder to which ink and dampening fluid are applied by the form roller; and a subtractive roller system including a roller for removing ink and dampening fluid from the form roller.
  • 24. The system of claim 23 further comprising a clean-up roller rotationally contacting the plate cylinder for removing residual ink from non-image areas of a printing plate.
  • 25. The system of claim 24 further comprising a transfer roller between the clean-up roller and the form roller, which transfer roller forms a nip with the form roller between points of contact of the plate cylinder and the subtractive roller system.
  • 26. The system of claim 24 wherein a single form roller of similar diameter of the plate cylinder is employed.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The patent application is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/617,017 filed Jul. 11, 2003, and a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/720,254 filed Nov. 25, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,883,427, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/813,887 filed Mar. 22, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,672,211, which is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/507,549 filed Feb. 18, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,571,710, issued on Jun. 3, 2003, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/122,765 filed. Mar. 3, 1999, all of which prior applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (74)
Number Name Date Kind
2285052 Roesen Jun 1942 A
2613600 McWhorter Oct 1952 A
2821133 Brodie Jan 1958 A
2986088 Chase et al. May 1961 A
3504626 Worthington Apr 1970 A
3587463 Granger Jun 1971 A
3611924 Harrison Oct 1971 A
3701316 Sylvester et al. Oct 1972 A
3800702 Roberts Apr 1974 A
3842735 Southam et al. Oct 1974 A
4040348 Gertsch et al. Aug 1977 A
4041864 Dahlgren et al. Aug 1977 A
4066017 Garcowaki et al. Jan 1978 A
4158333 Navi Jun 1979 A
4223603 Faddis et al. Sep 1980 A
4254709 Arnolds Mar 1981 A
4263848 Matalia et al. Apr 1981 A
4308796 Satterwhite Jan 1982 A
4373442 Dahlgren et al. Feb 1983 A
4373443 Matalia et al. Feb 1983 A
4397235 Fischer Aug 1983 A
4404908 Simeth Sep 1983 A
4428288 Harper et al. Jan 1984 A
4428291 Dorow Jan 1984 A
4432282 Jurinak Feb 1984 A
4453463 Dahlgren et al. Jun 1984 A
4493257 Kubert et al. Jan 1985 A
4497250 Dressler Feb 1985 A
4527471 Dahlgren et al. Jul 1985 A
4527479 Dahlgren et al. Jul 1985 A
4542693 Mourrellone Sep 1985 A
4621574 Faddis et al. Nov 1986 A
4685414 DiRico Aug 1987 A
4690055 Fadner et al. Sep 1987 A
4864925 Van Kanegan et al. Sep 1989 A
4967657 Popkin Nov 1990 A
5033380 Sonobe et al. Jul 1991 A
5046416 Freyer et al. Sep 1991 A
5178065 Reder et al. Jan 1993 A
5178678 Koehler et al. Jan 1993 A
5205216 Okamura et al. Apr 1993 A
5213044 Elia et al. May 1993 A
5218903 MacConnell et al. Jun 1993 A
5218905 Bolte et al. Jun 1993 A
5243910 Burch Sep 1993 A
5259313 Gibson et al. Nov 1993 A
5277112 Ohta et al. Jan 1994 A
5297488 Bunch, Jr. Mar 1994 A
5315930 Niemiro May 1994 A
5355796 Köbler et al. Oct 1994 A
5355799 Lutz Oct 1994 A
5388511 Iijima Feb 1995 A
5425809 Person Jun 1995 A
5447102 Pfeiffer et al. Sep 1995 A
5452660 Stein Sep 1995 A
5540149 Hoge Jul 1996 A
5603262 Vera et al. Feb 1997 A
5709147 Uera et al. Jan 1998 A
5865116 Keller Feb 1999 A
5870954 Lovenstein et al. Feb 1999 A
5908505 Bargenquest et al. Jun 1999 A
5915302 Baba et al. Jun 1999 A
5983799 Lane, III et al. Nov 1999 A
6006664 Hummel et al. Dec 1999 A
6006665 Stuchlik et al. Dec 1999 A
6041706 Murray Mar 2000 A
6055907 Endisch et al. May 2000 A
6065402 Feller et al. May 2000 A
6116161 Voge et al. Sep 2000 A
6382098 Inoue et al. May 2002 B2
6401618 Cheung et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409645 Paasonen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6588337 Kreckel et al. Jul 2003 B1
20010032559 Price et al. Oct 2001 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
11 30 453 May 1962 DE
44 24 581 Oct 1995 DE
61 106254 May 1986 JP
8304003 Nov 1983 WO
00 51817 Sep 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050028696 A1 Feb 2005 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60122765 Mar 1999 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09813887 Mar 2001 US
Child 10720254 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 10617017 Jul 2003 US
Child 10824599 US
Parent 10720254 Nov 2003 US
Child 10617017 US
Parent 09507549 Feb 2000 US
Child 09813887 US