Many inkjet printers use multiple printhead dies to print multiple colors each pass. The multiple printhead dies may be mounted in a carriage that scans back-and-forth across the media or in a page wide array (PWA).
Inkjet printers typically have one or more printhead dies where each printhead die has an array of nozzles. The printhead dies and media are moved relative to each other. In page wide array printers, the media is moved past the page wide array of print dies. Other inkjet printers have the print dies mounted on a carriage that moves hack and forth across the media width while printing swaths of ink. The media is then advanced between the different swaths. In both cases the direction of motion between the printhead dies and the media is called the print direction. The spacing or resolution of the ink drops on the paper in the print direction is determined by the frequency of firing pukes sent to the printhead die and the speed the media is moving with respect to the printhead dies. The spacing or resolution of the ink drops on the paper in the axis perpendicular to the print axis is determined by the nozzle spacing on the printhead die and the number of nozzles used.
The alignment of ink drops on the media from different printhead dies is affected by the spacing between the rows of nozzles in the different printhead dies and the speed the media is moving with respect to the printhead dies. The spacing in the print direction between the nozzles in the different printhead dies is X1. Distance X1 may vary due to manufacturing tolerance such that the spacing between the nozzles in the different printhead dies is non-uniform. For example, the spacing between the nozzles in printhead die 2 and printhead die 3 may be X1+delta, and the spacing between the nozzles in printhead the 3 and printhead die 4 may be X1−delta. The alignment of ink drops from different printhead dies can also be affected by media stretch or shrinkage due to wetting by the ink, drying, media tension variations, media speed variations and the like. By measuring the ink drop location on the media from the different printhead dies, the firing pulses for the nozzles in the different printhead dies can be aligned/calibrated such that the drops from the different printhead dies align.
Encoder 226 may be a 150 dpi quadrature encoder and output a 150 dpi encode signal. When using all 4 edges of the 150 dpi encoder signal a 600 dpi encode signal is generated. The output from encode 226 is used to derive the firing pulses for the different printhead dies. Printers typically print at multiple resolutions. For high quality jobs a printer may print at its native resolution, for example 1200 dots per inch (DPI). For high speed or lower quality jobs, the printing resolution may be 600 DPI. For draft modes the printing resolution may only be 300 to 150 DPI. The resolution for each print job is selected before the start of the print job. Once the print job resolution has been selected, the encoder signal will be up-sampled to a higher than priming resolution signal. For example, when printing at 600 dpi the encode signal will be up-sampled by 4× to 2400 dpi. The up-sampled 2400 dpi signal will be used to align the firing between the different printhead dies to sub-pixel accuracy at the printing resolution.
The column sync for die 3 is, aligned to phase 3 of the up-sampled encoder signal in line 332. This means die 3 will print dots of ink offset by 3/2400th of an inch relative to dots of ink printed by die 1. The column sync for die 4 is aligned to phase 2 of the up-sampled encoder signal in line 332. This means die 4 will print dots of ink offset by 2/2400th of an inch relative to dots of ink printed by die 1. Using this method, the ink drops from each printhead die can be aligned to sub-pixel accuracy at the print resolution. in one example embodiment of the invention, the up-sample rate is fixed and is independent of the print resolution. For example the encoder signal is always up-sampled by a factor of 4 so that the ink dots are aligned to within ¼ of the print resolution.
In another example embodiment of the invention, the up-sample rate is variable and is dependent on the print resolution. In this example, the up-sample rate would increase with decreasing print resolution. This could maintain the ink drop alignment between printhead dies at a constant physical distance. For example, when printing at 600 dpi, the up-sample rate may be 4× and when printing at 300 dpi the up-sample rate would be 8×. In each case the alignment between drops of in printed by two different printhead dies would be 1/2400th of an inch. This would be ¼ of a pixel at 600 dpi and ⅛ of a pixel at 300 dpi.
The selected phase of the up-sampled encoder signal for two printhead dies corresponds to a print offset between ink drops printed from the two printhead dies. The print offset between two printhead dies can be determined in the following way. One or more ink drops are printed by each of the two printhead dies using the encoder signals for each printhead die that should align the ink drops deposited on the media. The distance between the nozzles in the two printhead dies and the media speed past the printhead dies affect the alignment of the ink on the media. In some instances, the encoder signal for each printhead die that should align ink drops from the two printhead dies ma not be in the same phase. The ink drops that should align are printed and then the location or position of the ink drops on the media are measured. During a long print job, conditions in the printer and/or the media may change such that the encoder signals that should align the ink drops from the two printhead dies no longer align the ink drops from the two printhead dies.
The position of the ink drops are measured using an ink sensor. The print offset corresponds to the miss-alignment between the ink drops printed by the two printhead dies.
When the encoder signal is up-sampled by a factor of 4 from the print resolution, the miss-alignment between print dies can be corrected within ¼ of the print resolution. The print resolution in
The print offset between two printhead, dies can be measured by printing drops in a number of different locations. In some examples the ink drops are measured by looking at ink deposited in a page or image being printed. In other examples, the ink drops to be measured may be deposited between pages or in the margin alongside pages being printed. Because the ink drops can be measured in these different locations, the print offset between printhead dies can be updated dynamically during a print job. This allows the alignment between printhead dies to be adjusted on a per page bases, if needed. In some examples, the alignment between printhead dies may be updated on a periodic time period or at the start of each print job. In other examples, the alignment between printhead dies may be updated whenever the print offset exceeds a threshold value.
The examples above describe adjusting, the alignment of printhead dies using a pave wide array printer. Adjusting the alignment of printhead dies using this method may also be done for inkjet printers that have printhead dies moving across the media in a carriage.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/039055 | 5/23/2012 | WO | 00 | 10/9/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/176661 | 11/28/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5600351 | Holstun et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5923344 | Norum et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6338544 | Drake et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6749279 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6824239 | Hanabusa et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7637580 | Shamoun et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20040061730 | Askeland et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060170716 | Reyero et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20100141701 | Aruga | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110074860 | Saettel et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120086745 | Moriai et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10-0788664 | Dec 2007 | KR |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2012/039055, 9 pages, Mailing Date Feb. 15, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150062218 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |