A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The present invention relates to systems and methods for enabling and automating the delivery of interactive television (iTV) content to subscribers (viewers).
The above-cited patent applications individually demonstrate aspects of a system that provides for control of programming of content, including ads and promotions and other content, within an iTV system. The present invention is intended to illustrate a system and method that provides for programming content from the business perspective of ‘pay for placement’ or ‘shelf space’ within a framework of iTV applications.
In one embodiment, a set of programmable content elements of an interactive television (iTV) application are organized using business rules that describe preferred placement criteria of the programmable content elements. Once so organized, the content elements may be viewed, for example in conjunction with a user interface for the iTV application. The business rules may include rules for placing one or more of: product offerings, promotions, advertising campaigns, video on demand (VOD) listings, broadcast-on-demand listings, or transactional opportunities, across disparate iTV services. In some embodiment, the rules for placing product offerings are configured to accommodate multiple selection criteria including one or more of: location, current channel, current channel family, current channel category, time of day, offering category, current program, current program genre, current iTV application, current content type, or subscriber profile.
Alternatively, or in addition, the business rules may be configured to accommodate subscriber specific rules according to a subscriber profile associated with a particular client device. The business rules may be selected dynamically at the time of execution of the iTV application, or at the time of application creation.
In some embodiments, the preferred placement criteria include one or more of: brand, content owner, application location, current channel, current channel family, current channel category, time of day, content category, current program, current program genre, current iTV application, current content type, or subscriber and set-top box profile and behavior data. The programmable content elements may include one or more of: advertising, promotions, content placement packages or programming campaign definitions.
Each programmable element may be identified by a resource key attribute that references an associated programming campaign. Such a programming campaign may specify programming of associated content elements and includes a campaign key that uniquely identifies the programming campaign, a list of candidates each providing a set of programmed values for attributes of the associated content elements, a qualifying predicate for each candidate that includes a generalized set of conditions, and a display rule to select one candidate among those that qualify.
Generally then, the iTV application is accessible via a user interface that includes one or more groups of programmable opportunities. Each programmable opportunity may include a location within the iTV application here content may be placed. The content may include one or more of: advertisements, promotions, data including text, images, links to other applications, or audio/video content.
In a further embodiment, an iTV system includes a server configured to organize a set of programmable content elements of an iTV application using business rules that describe preferred placement criteria of the programmable content elements; and a client communicatively coupled to the server via a content distribution network and which is configured to display the content elements no organized to a viewer. The server may include (i) a programming manager configured to allow placement of advertising, promotional opportunities, video, images and text within user interfaces accessible by the viewer through the client; and (ii) a programming manager configured to program the content elements according to: a campaign key that uniquely identifies a programming campaign, a list of candidate content elements each providing a set of values for attributes of associated ones of the content element, a qualifying predicate for each candidate content element that consists of a generalized set of conditions, and a display rule to select one of the candidates among those that qualify.
The business rules are preferably adapted to accommodate one or more of: location, current channel, current channel family, current channel category, time-of-day, offering category, current program, current program genre, current application, current content type, or subscriber profile; and determine which of the content elements are shown via a user interface and when, and in what order and sequence the content elements should be displayed. In one particular embodiment, the business rules are described in XML format.
Generally, the business rules define preferred placements of the content elements based on one or more of the following criteria: time of day, current channel, current broadcast content, viewer demographic, viewer behavior, navigation context or current content category; and may be regarded as rules associated with one or more of the following categories: advertising and promotional rules; TV channel association rules; timing rules for rotation of content, ads, and promotions; category placement rules; VOD metadata rules; or self provisioning rules.
A further embodiment provides for describing programmable conditions for placement of content within an iTV application along multiple dimensions according to business rules that include sets of content programming rules that support creation of user interfaces within which the content is displayed. The content programming rules may include rules for time shifting so as to present different content selections to viewers based on time of day; rules adapted to permit different content selections to be presented based on current broadcast content; rules adapted to dynamically control content within tiled user interfaces; rules adapted to control placement of tiles within tiled user interfaces; rules adapted to permit groupings of ties within tiled user interfaces; and/or rules adapted to permit dynamically controlled transitions between tile groupings within tiled user interfaces. The content programming may be conditioned by dynamically executing the business rules, which may be conditioned by various parameters including: current application, application type, location, time-of-day, day part, current channel, current network family, current channel category, current program, current program genre, current program attributes, current content type, or application data. The business rules may be defined to target subscriber profile attributes including: demographics, service tier, geography, or subscriber behavior.
Described herein are methods and systems for providing preferred placement of programming content within an iTV system. Various embodiments of the present invention provide for organizing or sequencing the display of a set of programmable content elements to a viewer using business rules that describe preferred placement conditions or criteria. Such criteria may include some or all of: brand, content owner, application location, current channel, current channel family, current channel category, time of day, content category, current program, current program genre, current iTV application, current content type, and/or subscriber and set-top box profile and behavior data. In one implementation, the present invention allows for managing the ‘shelf space’ within and for iTV applications.
Within the present system, a server component presents a view of the programmable opportunities for automated control and management of individual programming opportunities or groups of programming opportunities. These programming opportunities can take the shape of lists, positioning within lists, groups of tiles, positioning of graphical elements, elements of a content ticker, or other representation methods for a multiplicity of content elements related via a programmed display or interaction sequence. The system operator (MSO), network programmer or content application owner may control different sets of these programmable opportunities. A single screen (e.g., for presentation to a television viewer) may display one or more groups of programmable opportunities.
The above-cited U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/390,064 (the “'064 application”) describes a framework for iTV applications that accommodates a system and method for management and delivery of programmable content, that may include advertising, promotions, content placement packages and/or programming campaign definitions, so as to permit a selection of a specific advertisement, promotion or content at a time of preparation of the iTV content by the server component, and/or a time of execution of the iTV applications by the client component. In the framework described in the '064 application, the iTV applications are tagged in a manner such that the iTV applications present all placement opportunities across all applications as a set of programmable opportunities. In this regard, a programmable opportunity can be any location or set of locations within the iTV applications where content may be placed, said content including advertisements, promotions, data including text, images, links to other applications, and/or audio/video delivered over broadcast or narrowcast, displayed in scaled inset or overlay form. The iTV applications are configured to respond in a subscriber-specific manner to user interactions with the iTV applications.
The selection or programming of content may be made according to one or more business rules, which may include rules for placing and/or automating product offerings, promotions, advertising campaigns, VOD, broadcast-on-demand, transactional opportunities, and/or other types of content across disparate television services. The rules for placing and/or automating product offerings across disparate iTV applications may accommodate multiple selection criteria, for example: location, current channel, current channel family, current channel category, time of day, offering category, current program, current program genre, current iTV application, current content type, and subscriber profile. Further, the business rules may accommodate subscriber-specific rules according to a subscriber profile associated with a particular one of the client devices upon which the client component is resident. The business rules may be selected at any of the following instances: dynamically at the time of execution of the iTV applications, or at the time of application creation.
The above-cited U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/247,901 (the “'901 application”) describes the concept of ‘preferred placement’ in the context of a user interface for interactive television services in which the content pieces, advertising and promotions can be organized according to configurable business rules to dynamically control the content and preferred placement of elements of content, including tiles, within displayed categories. These business rules can be configured according to time of day, television channel, channel content, preferred placement, viewer demographic, viewer behavior, navigation context and/or content category.
The above-cited U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/460,950 (the “'950 application”) describes user interfaces for preferred placement that allow for the programming of tiles of ads, promotions or other content in a manner that permits the control of individual tiles and groups of tiles along multiple dimensions. These placement opportunities may be controlled in the many ways described above, and also may be presented to viewers in multiple forms of iTV user interfaces through the common programming mechanisms.
Thus, the above-cited patent applications demonstrate aspects of a system that provides for controlling programming of content within an iTV system. In the present invention these elements are combined to provide a system and method that provides for programming content from the business perspective of ‘pay for placement’ or ‘shelf space’ within a framework of iTV applications.
A programming campaign specifies the programming of a content element and consists of four main components:
A programmable element is identified by the presence of a special resource key attribute that references a programming campaign; for example, via a lookup using the resource key as an index into a location list that provides the current campaign ID to use for programming the element. The application client (AC) 24 on set-top box 22 executes the campaign definition. This execution results in the selection of a qualifying candidate (e.g., by determining the truth value of the programming conditions). The selected candidate provides a resolution of one or more of the attributes and data of the programmable element, some of which may be newly specified, and some updated (e.g., from default values provided by the template and data package).
The above-described concept of programming by dynamic execution of rules is available as a mechanism to resolve properties of any content element. Wherever possible, triggering of rules execution is given the following preferential treatment (in order):
As further described in the above-cited patent applications, AS 14 includes a programming manager that allows a network operator, programmer or content producer to specify the elements of advertising, promotional opportunities, VOD placement, image and text placement, subscriber targeting, service and application provisioning, interactive user responses and other programming elements in the service. It allows the administrator to specify the condition predicates and dynamic associative lookups and business rules that constitute service programming.
Turning now to
As shown in the illustration, the business rules themselves may, in one embodiment, comprise rules associated with various data categories 28, which include:
The business rules component 26 receives the business rules, interprets them, and provides instructions that will eventually be applied to layout and display objects. The business rules component 26 determines what interface elements 30 (e.g., data, images, ads, menu choices, etc.) are shown and when, and in what order and sequence those elements should be displayed. In one embodiment this may include displaying an advertisement for a sports product when the viewer is tuned to a sports channel. In another embodiment this may include providing links to a specific video when a user tuned a specific channel at a specific time.
By way of illustration only, and without limitation, the XML example provided in '064 application provides for location definition and preferred placement within programming campaign definitions:
In this example, the ‘displayrule’ attribute indicates a preferred placement rule or sequence is to be applied, and the ‘displayruledata’ attribute provides the sequence data for the business rules component 26 to apply the ordering for content in the presentation user interface.
As another example, and without limitation, the XML example provided below illustrates another implementation of the business rules for preferred placement within programming campaign definition:
As an example, and without limitation, an XML schema that supports the above XML example can be given by the following XSD definition:
Programmable Conditions
The business rules that describe the programmable conditions for the placement of content long multiple dimensions, include sets of content programming rules that support the creation of user interfaces that permit (without limitation) the following:
Promotions, up-sells, advertising, customer care and other content programming can be controlled by the MSO and/or MSO-designated networks and programmers. The programming of content can be conditioned by various dynamically executed business rules conditioned by parameters exemplified, without limitation, by the XML examples above:
Programming business rules can also be defined to target subscriber profile attributes such as:
Turning now to user interfaces that illustrate aspects of the present invention.
Collectively,
In the embodiment shown in
In some cases special offers may be shown only to viewers who do not presently have access to the featured service. Multiple promotions may be targeted to a given location and selected according to an MSO-controlled rule. Programming campaigns for overlay applications such as the main menu 40 may be broadcast out-of-band using trickle feed and updated dynamically by the application client. Overlay application campaigns may also be broadcast in-band in special cases as described below.
Category Applications
Video sponsorship opportunities also exist and videos may be displayed in appropriate inset windows as illustrated in these examples. For example, a broadcaster or network operator may sponsor the Sports Application by paying for a video inset that is dynamically scaled on the server and broadcast alongside the Sports Application data carousel in the same 6 MHz channel. In general, iTV applications that overlay full screen or inset video can read data and programming campaigns from the in-band carousel without having to ‘tune-away’ only if the video channel is broadcast in the same 6-Mhz channel as the data carousel. This supports video sponsorship opportunities such the ones described herein as well as MSO barker channels.
In addition, on-demand programming can be listed according to a priority that includes ‘pay-for-placement’. Content providers can pay to be listed higher in sequence thereby being the first titles that the viewer sees.
Channel Hat
Network Application/Mini-Guides
The MSO can provide (paid) access to the network application in four ways: from the channel information bar associated with that channel; from the channel indicator in any On Now, On Later or Guide listing; from the channel indicator in the On Demand interface; and from promotional tiles advertising E!™ in others areas of the iTV service. The present example contains a pre-produced scaled video stream (VOD) blended with a full frame I-frame or motion background and listings for programs available on now, on later, and on demand as well as other content and promotions. By way of example, an E! application might provide the viewer with navigation to all On Now, On Later and On Demand programming from E! The subscriber can filter content by network-defined category selections and metadata.
Two content/promotions campaigns are also shown in the example illustrated in
Pre-produced scaled video can be broadcast as one of the category video feeds, in which case the programmer channel would be carried on the same 6 Mhz channel as the data carousel and thus have access to the carousel. Alternatively, the pre-produced programmer application video can be broadcast on another channel, which would be tuned after the programmer application data is loaded.
Microsites
Similar to the network/programmer applications above, but on a smaller scale, microsites are advertiser and local content provider destinations consisting of a few (e.g., one to three) pages of content. Under the MSO's control, promotions and ad tiles may be sprinkled throughout the iTV service leading viewers to these advertising destinations, in addition to access from menu listings in the ‘advertisers’ content area of the core iTV service.
“Shelf Space” Business Example
“Shelf space” describes how the MSO iTV application model can support business drivers, such as pay-for-placement, in order to monetize the core iTV navigation service as well as other iTV applications to sustain a free VOD model with advertising dollars. The following table 1 summarizes certain premium shelf space advertising elements and the application types that support each one.
Several examples are provided to illustrate scenarios for managing shelf space within iTV applications.
Collectively, all of the preferred placement concepts demonstrated herein and as illustrated in
A programming manager associated with the application server may enable the MSO to manage and control all of the advertising opportunities described above in a uniform manner across all iTV applications deployed with the present application system across markets, platforms and middleware. The programming manager provides an administrative interface to create and manage programming campaigns. Using the programming manager, the MSO can specify and organize the business rules that target programmable content to subscribers, across disparate iTV applications distributed to multiple markets. The programming engine executes these programming campaigns and server rules, generates programmable content and client business rules, and thus automates the flow of programmable content into enabled applications. The present application system will also integrate with the MSO web application interfaces to retrieve service tiers and franchise rate codes to enable targeting content based on subscriber profile information.
As used here, the term ‘programming’ refers to the ability to dynamically control the promotions, advertising, video and other types of content that appear across all interactive services in a unified manner, as well as to control the manner and deployment of the application services themselves. The programming manager may include web-based interfaces for the MSO, and MSO-approved content partners to dynamically control and schedule these promotions, advertising, video and other types of content in a uniform manner based on relevance and other business rules. It provides customized management interfaces for specific functions such as managing application and programming asset inventory and for defining promotional, up-sell and ad campaigns. VOD asset metadata, program listings and managed content metadata are made available to programming interfaces via browsers and query engines.
As used herein, the terms “computer method,” “computer program”, “routine,” and “subroutine” are substantially synonymous, with “computer method” being used typically (but not exclusively) to describe collections or groups of the latter two elements. Such programs and routines/subroutines may be rendered in any language including, without limitation, C#, C/C++, Fortran, COBOL, PASCAL, assembly language, markup languages (e.g., HTML, SGML, XML, VoXML), and the like, as well as object-oriented environments such as the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Java™ and the like. In general, however, all of the aforementioned terms as used herein are meant to encompass any series of logical steps performed in a sequence to accomplish a given purpose.
It should be appreciated that some portions of the detailed description above were presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the computer science arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers or the like. It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise, it will be appreciated that throughout the description of the present invention, use of terms such as “processing”, “computing”, “calculating”, “determining”, “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
The present invention can be implemented with an apparatus to perform the operations described herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computer, selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus.
The algorithms and processes presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method. For example, any of the methods according to the present invention can be implemented in hard-wired circuitry, by programming a general-purpose processor or by any combination of hardware and software. One of ordinary skill in the art will immediately appreciate that the invention can be practiced with computer system configurations other than those described below, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, DSP devices, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. The required structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description below.
The methods of the present invention may be implemented using computer software. If written in a programming language conforming to a recognized standard, sequences of instructions designed to implement the methods can be compiled for execution on a variety of hardware platforms and for interface to a variety of operating systems. In addition, the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of the invention as described herein. Furthermore, it is common in the art to speak of software, in one form or another (e.g., program, procedure, application, etc.), as taking an action or causing a result. Such expressions are merely a shorthand way of saying that execution of the software by a computer causes the processor of the computer to perform an action or produce a result.
Thus, methods and systems for providing preferred placement of programming content within an iTV system have been described. Although the present invention has been discussed with reference to several illustrated embodiment thereof these were meant to serve as examples only and the true scope of the invention should only be measured in terms of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/484,425, filed May 31, 2012, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/933,845, filed Sep. 2, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,220,018), which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/499,793, filed Sep. 2, 2003, and is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to the following applications: U.S. application Ser. No. 10/630,815, filed Jul. 29, 2003, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,413,205; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/460,950, filed Jun. 12, 2003, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,707,354; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/390,064, filed Mar. 14, 2003, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,042,132; and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/247,901 filed Sep. 19, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,365,230. Each of the above-mentioned applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5287489 | Nimmo et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5321750 | Nadan | Jun 1994 | A |
5353121 | Young et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5485221 | Banker et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5521841 | Arman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5583563 | Wanderscheid et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589892 | Knee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592551 | Lett et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594509 | Florin et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5613057 | Caravel | Mar 1997 | A |
5621456 | Florin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5657072 | Aristides et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659793 | Escobar et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666645 | Thomas et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675752 | Scott et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694176 | Bruette et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5737552 | Lavallee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5802284 | Karlton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5826102 | Escobar et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844620 | Coleman et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850218 | LaJoie et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852435 | Vigneaux et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860073 | Ferrel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5883677 | Hofmann | Mar 1999 | A |
5892902 | Clark | Apr 1999 | A |
5892905 | Brandt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905492 | Straub et al. | May 1999 | A |
5929849 | Kikinis | Jul 1999 | A |
5990890 | Etheredge | Nov 1999 | A |
5996025 | Day et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002394 | Schein et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005561 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008803 | Rowe et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008836 | Bruck et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016144 | Blonstein et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6025837 | Matthews, III et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038560 | Wical | Mar 2000 | A |
6049823 | Hwang | Apr 2000 | A |
6061695 | Slivka et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067108 | Yokote et al. | May 2000 | A |
6088722 | Herz et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091411 | Straub et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094237 | Hashimoto | Jul 2000 | A |
6141003 | Chor et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148081 | Szymanski et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162697 | Singh et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169543 | Wehmeyer | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172677 | Stautner et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177931 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191781 | Chaney et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195692 | Hsu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205582 | Hoarty | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219839 | Sampsell | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6239795 | Ulrich et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240555 | Shoff et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6281940 | Sciammarella | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292187 | Gibbs et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292827 | Raz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295057 | Rosin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314569 | Chernock et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317885 | Fries | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345305 | Beck et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6405239 | Addington et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415438 | Blackketter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421067 | Kamen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426779 | Noguchi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442755 | Lemmons et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6477705 | Yuen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486920 | Arai et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6522342 | Gagnon et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529950 | Lumelsky et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532589 | Proehl et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6564263 | Bergman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567104 | Andrew et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571392 | Zigmond et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6591292 | Morrison et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6621509 | Eiref et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636887 | Augeri | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658661 | Arsenault et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678891 | Wilcox et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684400 | Goode et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6698020 | Zigmond et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6731310 | Craycroft et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6760043 | Markel | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763522 | Kondo et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766526 | Ellis | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6806887 | Chernock et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6857128 | Borden, IV et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6886029 | Pecus et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6910191 | Segerberg et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918131 | Rautila et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7028327 | Dougherty et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7065785 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7103904 | Blackketter et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7114170 | Harris et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7134072 | Lovett et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7152236 | Wugofski et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7162694 | Venolia | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162697 | Markel | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177861 | Tovinkere et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197715 | Valeria | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7207057 | Rowe | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7213005 | Mourad et | May 2007 | B2 |
7221801 | Jang et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7237252 | Billmaier | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7293275 | Krieger et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7305696 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313806 | Williams et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7337457 | Pack et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7360232 | Mitchell | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363612 | Satuloori et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7406705 | Crinon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7440967 | Chidlovskii | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7464344 | Carmichael et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7472137 | Edelstein et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7490092 | Sibley et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7516468 | Deller et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7523180 | DeLuca et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7587415 | Gaurav et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7624416 | Vandermolen et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7640487 | Amielh-Caprioglio et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7702315 | Engstrom et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703116 | Moreau et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7721307 | Hendricks et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7743330 | Hendricks et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7752258 | Lewin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7861259 | Barone, Jr. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7913286 | Sarachik et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7958528 | Moreau et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8266652 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8296805 | Tabatabai et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8365230 | Chane et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8381259 | Khosla | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8448208 | Moreau et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8660545 | Redford et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8699862 | Sharifi et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8793256 | McIntire et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8850495 | Pan | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8863196 | Patil et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8938675 | Holladay et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8973063 | Spilo et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9021528 | Moreau et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20010014206 | Artigalas et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027563 | White et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010049823 | Matey | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056573 | Kovac et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056577 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010928 | Sahota | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016969 | Kimble | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023270 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026642 | Augenbraun et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035573 | Black et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041104 | Graf et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042915 | Kubischta et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059094 | Hosea et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059586 | Carney et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059629 | Markel | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067376 | Martin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069407 | Fagnani et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020070978 | Wishoff et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078444 | Krewin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078449 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083450 | Kamen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020100041 | Rosenberg | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107973 | Lennon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108122 | Alao et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120609 | Lang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124254 | Kikinis | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020144268 | Khoo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144269 | Connelly | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144273 | Reto | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147645 | Alao et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152477 | Goodman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156839 | Peterson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169885 | Alao et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170059 | Hoang | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171691 | Currans et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171940 | He et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184629 | Sie et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188944 | Noble | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194181 | Wachtel | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196268 | Wolff et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199190 | Su | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001880 | Holtz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005444 | Crinon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005453 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014752 | Zaslavsky et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014753 | Beach et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018755 | Masterson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023970 | Panabaker | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025832 | Swart et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028873 | Lemmons | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041104 | Wingard et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051246 | Wilder et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056216 | Wugofski et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056218 | Wingard et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058948 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061028 | Dey et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066081 | Barone et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067554 | Klarfeld | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070170 | Lennon | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079226 | Barrett | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084443 | Laughlin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084444 | Ullman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084449 | Chane et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030086694 | Davidsson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093790 | Logan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093792 | Labeeb et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097657 | Zhou et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110500 | Rodriguez | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110503 | Perkes | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115219 | Chadwick | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115612 | Mao et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126601 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030132971 | Billmaier et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135464 | Mourad et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135582 | Allen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140097 | Schloer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151621 | McEvilly et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158777 | Schiff et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172370 | Satuloori et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182663 | Gudorf et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030189668 | Newnam et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204814 | Elo et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204846 | Breen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204854 | Blackketter et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207696 | Willenegger et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226141 | Krasnow et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229899 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003402 | McKenna | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019900 | Knightbridge et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019908 | Williams et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040031015 | Ben-Romdhane et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031058 | Reisman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039754 | Harple | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078814 | Allen | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107437 | Reichardt et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040107439 | Hassell et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111465 | Chuang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128699 | Delpuch et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133923 | Watson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136698 | Mock | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172648 | Xu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194136 | Finseth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199578 | Kapczynski et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221306 | Noh | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226051 | Carney et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050005288 | Novak | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015796 | Bruckner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015804 | LaJoie et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028208 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050086172 | Stefik | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050125835 | Wei | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149972 | Knudson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050155063 | Bayrakeri et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160458 | Baumgartner | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050262542 | DeWeese et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283800 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287948 | Hellwagner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004743 | Murao et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060059525 | Jerding et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068818 | Leitersdorf et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080707 | Laksono | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105793 | Gutowski et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060156336 | Knudson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195865 | Fablet | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200842 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206470 | McIntyre | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206912 | Klarfeld et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060248572 | Kitsukama et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070050343 | Siddaramappa et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064715 | Lloyd et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070112761 | Xu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070211762 | Song et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214123 | Messer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214488 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220016 | Estrada et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239707 | Collins et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250901 | McIntire et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260700 | Messer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271587 | Rowe | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080037722 | Klassen | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080060011 | Kelts | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071770 | Schloter et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092201 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080113504 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126109 | Cragun et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133504 | Messer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183681 | Messer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183698 | Messer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189740 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080196070 | White et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204595 | Rathod et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208796 | Messer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208839 | Sheshagiri et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221989 | Messer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235209 | Rathod et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235393 | Kunjithapatham et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235725 | Hendricks | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080250010 | Rathod et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256097 | Messer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266449 | Rathod et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276278 | Krieger et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288641 | Messer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288644 | Gilfix et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080317233 | Rey et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006315 | Mukherjea et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019485 | Ellis et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024629 | Miyauchi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025054 | Gibbs et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090083257 | Bargeron et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094113 | Berry et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094632 | Newnam et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094651 | Damm et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090123021 | Jung et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164904 | Horowitz et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090222872 | Schlack | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228441 | Sandvik | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240650 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249427 | Dunnigan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271829 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292548 | Van Court | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100077057 | Godin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079670 | Frazier et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100175084 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180300 | Carpenter et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100223640 | Reichardt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250190 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251284 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110055282 | Hoving | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110058101 | Earley et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087348 | Wong | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093909 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110131204 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176787 | DeCamp | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110209180 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214143 | Rits et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219419 | Reisman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246495 | Mallinson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110247042 | Mallinson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120002111 | Sandoval et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120054811 | Spears | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120117151 | Bill | May 2012 | A1 |
20120227073 | Hosein et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233646 | Coniglio et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120295686 | Lockton | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120324002 | Chen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324495 | Matthews, III et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324518 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130110769 | Ito | May 2013 | A1 |
20130111514 | Slavin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130262997 | Markworth et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130298038 | Spivack et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326570 | Cowper et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332839 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332852 | Castanho et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130347018 | Limp et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130347030 | Oh et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006951 | Hunter | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140009680 | Moon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032473 | Enoki et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140089423 | Jackels | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140149918 | Asokan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140150022 | Oh et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140325359 | Vehovsky et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140365302 | Walker | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150026743 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150263923 | Kruglick | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2685833 | Nov 2009 | CA |
2832800 | Nov 2013 | CA |
2845465 | Mar 2014 | CA |
0624039 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0963115 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1058999 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1080582 | Mar 2001 | EP |
9175979.5 | Nov 2009 | EP |
13192112.4 | Nov 2013 | EP |
14159227.9 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2323489 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2448874 | Nov 2008 | GB |
2448875 | Nov 2008 | GB |
9963757 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0011869 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0033576 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0110115 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0182613 | Nov 2001 | WO |
02063426 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02063471 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02063851 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02063878 | Aug 2002 | WO |
03009126 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03026275 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2007115224 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008053132 | May 2008 | WO |
2011053271 | May 2011 | WO |
2012094105 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012154541 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fernando Pereira, “The MPEG-4 Book”, Prentice Hall, Jul. 10, 2002. |
Michael Adams, “Open Cable Architecture”, Cisco Press, Dec. 3, 1999. |
Andreas Kraft and Klaus Hofrichter, “An Approach for Script-Based Broadcast Application Production”, Springer-Verlag Brling Heidelberg, pp. 74-82, 1999. |
Mark Riehl, “XML and Perl”, Sams, Oct. 16, 2002. |
MetaTV, Inc., PCT/US02/29917 filed Sep. 19, 2002, International Search Report dated Apr. 14, 2003; ISA/US; 6 pages. |
Sylvain Devillers, “Bitstream Syntax Definition Language: an Input to MPEG-21 Content Representation”, Mar. 2001, ISO, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 MPEG01/M7053. |
Shim, et al., “A SMIL Based Graphical Interface for Interactive TV”, Internet Tech. Laboratory Dept. of Comp. Engineering, San Jose State University, pp. 257-266, 2003. |
Yoon, et al., “Video Gadget: MPET-7 Based Audio-Visual Content Indexing and Browsing Engine”, LG Electronics Institute of Technology, 2001, pp. 59-68. |
Watchwith webpage; http://www.watchwith.com/content—owners/watchwith—plalform—components.jsp (last visited Mar. 12, 2013). |
Matt Duffy; TVplus App reveals content click-through rates north of 10% across sync enabled programming; http://www.tvplus.com/blog/TVplus-App-reveals-content-click-through-rates-north-of-10-Percent-across-sync-enabled-programming (retrieved from the Wayback Machine on Mar. 12, 2013). |
“In Time for Academy Awards Telecast, Companion TV App Umami Debuts First Real-Time Sharing of a TV Program's Images”; Umami News; http:www.umami.tv/2012-02-23.html (retrieved from the Wayback Machine on Mar. 12, 2013). |
European Patent Application No. 09175979.5—Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2011. |
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,685,833—Office Actoin dated Jan. 20, 2012. |
Li, Y. et al. “Reliable Video Clock Time Recognition”, Pattern Recognition, 2006, 1CPR 1006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 4 pages. |
European Search Report dated Mar. 1, 2010. |
Salton et al., Computer Evaluation of Indexing and Text Processing Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 1968, pp. 8-36. |
Smith, J.R. et al., An Image and Video Search Engine for the World-Wide Web Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases 5, San Jose, Feb. 13-14, 1997, Proceedings of Spie, Belingham, Spie, US, vol. 3022, Feb. 13, 1997, pp. 84-95. |
Kontothoanassis, Ledonias et al. “Design, Implementation, and Analysis of a Multimedia Indexing and Delivery Server”, Technical Report Series, Aug. 1999, Cambridge Research Laboratory. |
Messer, Alan et al., “SeeNSearch: A context Directed Search Facilitator for Home Entertainment Devices”, Paper, Samsung Information Systems America Inc., San Jose, CA, 2008. |
Boulgouris N. V. et al., “Real-Time Compressed-Domain Spatiotemporal Segmentation and Ontologies for Video Indexing and Retrieval”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 606-621, May 2004. |
Changsheng Xu et al., “Using Webcast Text for Semantic Event Detection in Broadcast Sports Video”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 1342-1355, Nov. 2008. |
Liang Bai et al., “Video Semantic Content Analysis based on Ontology”, International Machine Vision and Image Processing Conference, pp. 117-124, Sep. 2007. |
Koskela M. et al., “Measuring Concept Similarities in Multimedia Ontologies: Analysis and Evaluations”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 912-922, Aug. 2007. |
Steffan Staab et al., “Semantic Multimedia”, Reasoning Web; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 125-170, Sep. 2008. |
European Search Report for Application No. 09180776.8, mailed Jun. 7, 2010, 9 pages. |
European Search Report, EP 09 18 0762, completion date Mar. 22, 2010. |
European Search Report dated Jun. 4, 2010. |
EP Application No. 09 179 987.4-1241—Office Action mailed Feb. 15, 2011. |
European Application No. 09 175 979.5—Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2011. |
Boronat F et al: “Multimedia group and inter-stream synchronization techniques: A comparative study”, Information Systems. Pergamon Press. Oxford. GB. vol. 34. No. 1. Mar. 1, 2009. pp. 108-131. XP025644936. |
Extended European Search Report—EP14159227.9—Mailing Date: Sep. 3, 2014. |
European Extended Search Report—EP 13192112.4—Dated May 11, 2015. |
CA Response to Office Action—CA Appl. 2,685,833—Submitted Jul. 17, 2015. |
Response to European Office Action—European Appl. 13192112.4—submitted Dec. 9, 2015. |
CA Office Action—CA App 2,685,833—Mailed Jan. 27, 2016. |
Canadian Office Action—CA 2,685,833—Dated Jan. 22, 2015. |
European Office Action—EP App 14159227.9—Dated Jul. 12, 2016. |
Agnieszka Zagozdzinnska et al. “TRIDAQ Systems in HEP Experiments at LHC Accelerator” Kwartalnik Elektroniki I Telekomunikacji, vol. 59, No. 4, Jan. 1, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150229869 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60499793 | Sep 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13484425 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14572131 | US | |
Parent | 10933845 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 13484425 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10630815 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 10933845 | US | |
Parent | 10390064 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10630815 | US | |
Parent | 10247901 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 10390064 | US | |
Parent | 10460950 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10247901 | US |