Prismatic structures have been used in the past to direct sunlight into offices, retail stores, public buildings and homes to provide natural lighting and reduce the need for artificial lighting. Luxfer, circa 1910, was an example of this using glass prism structures in windows to direct light into work areas that benefited from natural lighting. Though the Luxfer product was an effective attempt to direct sunlight into buildings it is was expensive, heavy and limited in efficiency to the area of prisms installed in the structure. More recently Serra Solar has been test marketing a similar concept using a micro-prism polymeric product that is less expensive and can be attached to windows but once installed occupies a fixed area of the window. (See U.S. Patents assigned to Serra Solar U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,900 (Milner) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,880,886 (Milner); also see Chi Lin U.S. Pat. No. 8,107,164 (Tsai).
The need for natural lighting still exists but improvements to the original Luxfer concept have not met the needs of the building and architectural community. To address the need to bring daylight into work areas a microreplicated polymeric version of aspects of the Luxfer concept has been produced by SerraSolar Inc. of San Jose, Calif. Various prism geometries can be produced to redirect light at different angles but since the geometry is miniaturized by microreplication the product can be manufactured as a thin film, typically 350 to 400 μm thick and at much lower cost. This product has already been reduced to practice.
Because the prism film is not image transparent, an entire window cannot be covered if there is a need to see through the window. In order to solve this problem with prism films, and to simply and effectively change the area of the window that can redirect daylight, the invention herein comprises a prism film that can be incorporated in a roller type shade that can increase or decrease both the daylight directing and image visible area of the window. The novel shade can be operated manually or by remote control to vary the daylight directing area at will depending on the need for light or time of day, or the amount of through window visibility desired.
In one embodiment of the invention, a roller window shade comprises a film having at least one microprismatic area integrally formed on said film, said film to provide daylighting direction control for redirecting incoming daylight to the ceiling of an associated room in which the shade is located on a window in a wall of the associated room, and whereby the vertical position of the shade can increase or decrease both the daylight directing and image visible area of the associated window.
In one aspect of the invention, the roller window shade further includes at least two microprismatic areas on the shade, each microprismatic area having a different prismatic angular configuration for directing incoming sunlight to different locations of the ceiling. In another aspect of the invention, the roller window shade comprises a polymer having a width and length, and wherein said microprismatic area extends over the full width thereof and over a portion of the length thereof.
In another aspect of the invention, the roller window shade comprises different microprismatic areas that are spaced longitudinally from one another along the width of said shade.
In another aspect of the invention, the roller window shade comprises a polymer film and wherein the microprismatic area is integrally formed as a part of said film.
In another aspect of the invention, the roller window shade comprises a polymer film and wherein the microprisrnatic area is integrally formed as a part of said film, in which the polymer optionally comprises one or both of a UV absorber and an IR reflecting or absorbing layer, thereby to allow said shade to diminish damage caused by UV radiation and to effectively diminish IR heat from the associated room while still directing daylight entering the room.
In another aspect of the invention, the roller window shade comprises a polymer that is PMMA, the rnicroprisms have a height of about 0.250 mm and a pitch of 0.207 mm, said film having a total thickness of about 0.375 mm.
In one embodiment of the invention, a roller type window shade for directing daylight onto the ceiling of an associated room in which the shade is positioned on a window of such room comprises a polymer film having a width commensurate with the width of the associated windmill and a length commensurate with the length of the associated window, said film having at least one microprismatic area integrally formed as part of said film and extending along the width of said shade for redirecting daylight upwardly toward the ceiling of the associated room, and whereby the position of the shade can increase or decrease both the daylight directing and image visible area of the associated window.
In another aspect of the invention, the roller type window shade further includes at least first and second microprismatic areas on the shade, each microprismatic area having a different prismatic angular configuration for directing incoming sunlight to different locations of the ceiling.
A typical daylight prism has 45 degree angles with a height of 0.250 mm and a pitch of 0.207 mm. The overall thickness of the film is typically 0.375 mm thick and can be fabricated from PMMA, Polycarbonate, Polyurethane or various other polymers. To assure damaging UV radiation is controlled, UV absorbers can be added to the polymer substrates so only the visible wavelengths are transmitted. A further advantage of this concept includes adding IR reflecting or absorbing layers allowing the same product to effectively diminish IR heat from the room while still directing daylight.
Yet another advantage of this product is the ability to provide an embodiment having two different prismatic areas in the same shade for some regions of the shade. One prismatic area in the summer months would have prisms optimized with the solar elevation angle for that time of the year and have IR reflecting or absorbing layers to diminish IR heat from the room. A second prismatic area in the same shade would be optimized for the solar elevation angle in winter months and without the IR reflecting or absorbing layers to provide more radiant heat in the winter.
A specific design example for variable prism film that could broadly apply is generally illustrated at
So if the correct variable prisms are applied to a shade that covers the upper zones of a window as illustrated, sunlight will be redirected onto the inner 18 feet of the ceiling and thus illuminate the depth of the room.
The 45-0 prism design as shown in
Total thickness of the substrate is typically 0.375 mm.
Polymeric microprisrnatic film as described herein can be manufactured by hot polymer embossing as described in Pricone U.S. Pat. No. 4,486,363. Using this process different zones of microprisms can be incorporated in the embossing belt allowing the polymeric microprismatic product to be manufactured continuously with zones repeating as necessary corresponding to the lengths necessary for use in the shade.
In another embodiment, a dual-roller shade is provided, wherein two shades are provided to provide more efficient light refraction for different seasons such as summer and winter. Alternatively, even more shades can be provided to enhance the efficiency of light refraction throughout the year as the height in the sky of the sun's path through the sky changes as the seasons progress. Each of the roller shades are configured to cover all or substantially all of a window and a support is configured to be mounted above or beside the window (such as within the window cutout from the wall or the window frame) and hang on the interior or exterior side of the window.
In an embodiment shown in
The first roller shade 1001 has a series of grooves 1101 with a V-shaped cross-section that run horizontally along the first roller shade 1001 and open on the interior-facing side 1105 of the first roller shade 1001. The interior-facing side 1105 is opposed to the exterior-facing side 1106 of the roller shade 1001, which is flat in a vertical plane. Areas along the interior-facing side 1105 between openings of the grooves 1101 are flat in a vertical plane, i.e. vertically flat when the roller shade is installed and hanging down.
In an embodiment, the center angle of the grooves 1110 as measured at the inside angle of the V-shaped cross sectional shape (that is the angle formed by the intersection of the top and bottom portions of the groove) is 3 to 45 degrees, such as 5 to 30 degrees, or 8 to 20 degrees. In an embodiment, the center angle of the grooves 1110 varies as the grooves proceed down the first roller shade 1001, this results in a more severe angle of refraction for the incoming light focusing the light towards the ceiling of the room. The grooves may cover the entire length of the first roller shade 1001, or only the top 10 to 33%, or the top 33 to 99% of the total length of the first roller shade 1001.
The top angle of the grooves 1108, is defined as the angle made by the top portion of the grooves 1103 relative to a horizontal line 1104 extending behind the vertex of the grooves 1107 and bisecting the vertex 1107 of the grooves. In an embodiment, as the roller shade is hanging down, the horizontal line 1104 is at a right angle to the exterior-facing side 1106. See
The second roller shade also has a series of grooves with a V-shaped cross-section that opens on the interior-facing side of the second roller shade. The interior-facing side of the second roller shade is opposed to the exterior-facing side of the second roller shade, which is flat.
In an embodiment, the first roller shade 1001 is a winter shade and the second roller shade 1002 is a summer shade. The winter shade is the same except it differs from the summer shade in that at least a portion if not all of the center angles of the grooves 1110 are modified to be less acute respectively as the grooves proceed down the shades. For example, the first groove on the winter shade is less acute than the first groove on the summer shade, and the second groove on the winter shade is less acute than the second groove on the summer shade, and so forth. In an embodiment, the winter shade differs from the summer shade in that the top angle of the grooves 1108 is modified to be more acute respectively as the grooves proceed down the shades. For example, the difference between the respective center angle of the grooves 1110 and/or the top angle of the grooves 1108 between the winter and summer shades may be 3 to 12%, such as 4 to 10%, or 5 to 9%. In an embodiment, the center and or top angles of the grooves are adjusted to the arc of the sun at the 40th degree north latitude.
In an embodiment, the winter shade also differs from the summer shade in that it is free of IR absorbers, and the summer shade contains IR absorbers, thereby providing more warmth from sunlight in the winter than in the summer.
In an embodiment, the winter shade also differs from the summer shade in that is contains no tint, or is less darkly tinted (has a greater overall light transmittance) than the winter shade.
In an embodiment, such as is shown in
All angles and other measurements are determined as the respective roller shade is extended vertically toward the ground.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/652,918, filed on Jun. 17, 2015, which, in turn, was a national stage entry of PCT/US2013/075842, filed on Dec. 17, 2013, which in turn, claimed priority to U.S. Application No. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/738218, filed on Dec. 17, 2012. All of these prior applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61738218 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14652918 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15265953 | US |