The present invention relates generally to the field of radiation imaging and, in particular, to positron emission tomography (PET).
PET is a nuclear medical imaging modality that produces three-dimensional (3D) images to see functional processes in a living organism. PET is commonly used in clinical oncology for detecting cancer and for clinical diagnosis of heart problems and/or brain disorders. After being introduced into the organism, positron-emitting radionuclides decay with each annihilation, emitting two photons in diametrically opposing directions. Time of flight (TOF) measurements may be utilized to measure the time for the electromagnetic wave to travel a distance through a medium. A TOF PET system detects the photons, and uses TOF information to determine if two registered photons are in time coincidence, i.e., belong to a same positron annihilation event. The TOF PET system uses an arrival time difference to localize each annihilation event. Without the TOF localization data, computationally expensive iterative reconstruction algorithms are used to estimate the 3D distribution of events that provide the best match with the measured projection data. Modern PET readout is performed with silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) due to their speed and magnetic resonance compatibility.
High depth-of-interaction (DOI) resolution is needed in PET scintillators to reduce parallax error and the resulting spatial blur, which is especially prominent in detection system with small ring diameters, such as single-organ inserts. DOI readout is traditionally performed with a double-sided readout using two readout arrays per scintillator array. However, the double-sided readout requires double electronics compared to a regular PET system. Therefore, recent research has focused on the development of single-sided readout techniques, which only requires one scintillator and one readout array. Multiple scintillator crystals are typically coupled to single readout pixels to reduce system cost, although 1:1 coupling can also be used.
Modern DOI techniques use substantially flat reflective light guides at the top of the scintillator array to redirect light to other readout pixels. In doing so, DOI information can be gained by detection of a fraction of the maximum light absorbed on a single SiPM pixel and the detected fraction to the total light absorbed across all pixels of an array for a single gamma ray interaction event. Only two different readout pixels are required to make this measurement. However, having more pixels is useful to improve the DOI resolution.
Conventional light guide geometry uses a flat, uniform reflective material, which primarily directs light back into the original scintillation crystal that gamma ray absorption took place in, rather than redirecting the light to other crystals and readout pixels. This results in suboptimal DOI resolution since most of the light is not being shared with other pixels, which is required to make DOI measurements, thus making single-sided DOI readout ineffective. Current single-sided DOI readout with high aspect ratio scintillators (˜15-20 mm thick) and uniform light guides are only able to achieve ˜5 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) DOI resolution. In contrast, double-sided readout can achieve DOI resolution on the order of 1 mm FWHM, leaving much room for improvement of single-sided techniques before they become feasible to use in practice. Conventional systems and methods fail to provide impactful light sharing techniques in PET detector systems.
Anger logic schemes are traditionally employed to improve the overall detector system resolution by localizing gamma ray interaction down to the crystal level via centroiding. Because of poor light sharing of conventional uniform light guides, Anger logic localization on the periphery of the detector array is severely degraded compared to that of centralized crystals and detectors since peripheral crystals have fewer crystals and pixels for sharing.
To overcome shortcomings of conventional systems, provided herein are a system and method for improved light sharing between scintillator crystals in PET detector systems. The present disclosure overcomes the shortcomings of conventional DOI readout systems and methods, provides improved DOI resolution and more uniform Anger logic localization performance across entire detector arrays.
Accordingly, aspects of the present invention address the above problems and disadvantages and provide the advantages described below. An aspect of the present invention provides a device for detecting sub-atomic particles, the device including a plurality of scintillators, at least one detector provided on a first end of the scintillator, and a prismatoid provided on a second end of the scintillator, with the prismatoid configured to redirect light between a first pair of adjacent scintillators of the plurality of scintillators.
An aspect of the present disclosure provides a prismatoid that includes a reflective surface configured to redirect travel of at least one photon emitted from at least one scintillator of a pair of scintillators adjacent to the reflective surface, with the travel of the at least one photon being redirected from the at least one scintillator of a first pair of scintillators toward another scintillator of the first pair of scintillators.
A further aspect of the present disclosure provides a system for non-invasive medical imaging that includes at least one prismatoid, at least one detector, and a scintillator array. The at least one prismatoid redirects light between adjacent scintillators of scintillator array. The at least one detector is provided on an end of the scintillator array opposite the at least one prismatoid, and the prismatoid is substantially shaped as at least one of at least one prism, at least one antiprism, at least one frustum, at least one triangle, at least one cupola, at least one parallelepiped, at least one wedge, at least one pyramid, at least one truncated pyramid, and at least one portion of a sphere.
The above and other aspects, features and advantages of certain embodiments of the present invention will be more apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The following detailed description of certain embodiments of the present invention will be made with reference to the accompanying drawings. In describing the invention, explanation about related functions or constructions known in the art are omitted for the sake of clarity, to avoid obscuring the invention with unnecessary detail.
Each scintillator 211, 212, 213, 214 may include a first interior side 211a, 212a and a second interior side 211c, 212c. The second interior side 211c, 212c may be substantially parallel with the respective first interior side 211a, 212a, and the first interior side 211a, 212a and the second interior side 211c, 212c run substantially from the first end 211d to the second end 211b, thereby providing an interior light guide 211g, 212g between each respective first side 211a, 212a and second side 211c, 212c configured to reflect light therebetween, for transmitting substantially all of the light from respective prismatoids 120 of the prism light guide 100 to respective detectors 300. The interior light guide reflects substantially all light within respective scintillators 211, 212, 213, 214 traveling from respective prismatoids 120 to respective detectors 130. As illustrated in
The prismatoid 120 provides stabilized light guide geometry at the first end face 211d of the scintillator array 100. The prismatoid light guide 100 reflects light, without functioning as a high-energy photon detector. As illustrated in
At least two SiPM pixels 380a, 380b of the detector 300 are coupled to a respective prismatoid 120 via scintillator crystals 211, 212, 213, 214, to enable differential single-sided readout for DOI capabilities.
The controlled light sharing of the present disclosure increases system-level count rate. In contrast, in a uniform light guide, each scintillation event requires readout from all SiPM pixels to calculate the DOI and perform centroiding, since light is expected to be shared across all scintillators. On the other hand, the prismatoid light guide of the present disclosure provides precise identification of which scintillator columns will share light with each other. Scintillators will only share light with columns coupled to a same prismatoid. As illustrated, each non-peripheral prismatoid is coupled to at least four scintillators, which belong to anywhere from at least two to four SiPM pixels depending on the detector array geometry. As a result, readout is only required for a smaller subset of pixels at a time for each scintillation event, enabling simultaneous readout in other parts of the detector array, thereby increasing the system-level count rate when compared with the count rate of a detector system using a conventional uniform light guide.
Increased uniformity of Anger logic centroiding resolution throughout the detector array is provided, since light is purposely directed to other pixels. In contrast, in conventional uniform light guides do not specifically couple or purposely direct light to specific other SiPM pixels. Also, conventional uniform light guides introduce edge effects where centroiding resolution decreases drastically along the edges of the scintillator array. In contrast, the configuration of the first prismatoid 410, the second prismatoid 420 and the third prismatoid 430 is completely symmetrical regarding light sharing between scintillators and eliminates edge effects in conventional systems. See,
Comparison of the ray traces of
As shown in the conventional planar uniform light guide of
As shown in
A method of fabrication is provided that includes affixing the prismatoid light guide onto one end of a scintillator, which may be provided as a block of scintillator crystals, with the detector module affixed to an opposite end of the scintillator. The prismatoid 120 may be deposited on the one end of the scintillator array by sputtering. The prismatoid may also be removably attached to the one end of the scintillator. The scintillators may be polished and then de-polished along lateral faces thereof to introduce roughness and improve DOI resolution by creating differential light sharing along the lateral faces as a function of gamma ray interaction depth.
While the invention has been shown and described with reference to certain aspects thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof. No recitation of any claim set forth below is to be construed as a means plus function element without express use of “means for” or “step for.”
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Applications No. 62/789,559 and 62/957,991 filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2019 and Jan. 7, 2020, respectively, the entire contents of each which is incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with government support under grant number EB024849 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/012707 | 1/8/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/146475 | 7/16/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3944835 | Vosburgh | Mar 1976 | A |
4394576 | Tananaka et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4415808 | Cusano et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
5616924 | Petrillo | Apr 1997 | A |
6288399 | Andreaco et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6516044 | Lyons | Feb 2003 | B1 |
7088901 | Kim et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7132664 | Crosetto | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7601963 | Aykac et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8350218 | Thon et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8436312 | Inadama et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
9304211 | Goertzen | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9599724 | Wieczorek et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9618631 | Zerrouk et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9645258 | Reyna | May 2017 | B1 |
9696439 | An | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9720102 | Page et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9915739 | Benlloch Baviera et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10024999 | Kasten et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10527738 | Weedon et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
11454730 | Goldan | Sep 2022 | B2 |
20050087692 | Romanov et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20080121806 | Grazioso | May 2008 | A1 |
20100270463 | Lee et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110017916 | Schulz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110121184 | Inadama et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110192981 | Menge et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110192982 | Henseler et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120061577 | Oleinik | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120235047 | Lewellen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130112856 | Ferenc | May 2013 | A1 |
20140064446 | Wear et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140299777 | Oleinik | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140353510 | Spanoudaki et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150355346 | Weston et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160223688 | Yamashita et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160223690 | Uchida | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160231439 | Trost et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170123084 | Ferenc | May 2017 | A1 |
20170234990 | Sowards-Emmerd et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170285182 | Fu | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20190053772 | Benlloch Baviera et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190223725 | Lu et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200326434 | Goldan | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102597805 | Jul 2012 | CN |
105655435 | Jun 2016 | CN |
107076859 | Aug 2017 | CN |
206725802 | Dec 2017 | CN |
111971585 | Nov 2020 | CN |
113614574 | Nov 2021 | CN |
2912210 | Oct 1979 | DE |
69929027 | Aug 2006 | DE |
0437051 | May 1995 | EP |
3054319 | Aug 2016 | EP |
3532876 | Sep 2019 | EP |
3908856 | Aug 2022 | EP |
2 727 282 | Oct 2019 | ES |
H 05203755 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H 085746 | Jan 1996 | JP |
H 0961533 | Mar 1997 | JP |
H 09325185 | Dec 1997 | JP |
H 10232284 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2955487 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000193749 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000258540 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2003265457 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2005099027 | Apr 2005 | JP |
5110879 | Dec 2012 | JP |
5405866 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2014527690 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2016142561 | Aug 2016 | JP |
2016537640 | Dec 2016 | JP |
2019163970 | Sep 2019 | JP |
6862427 | Apr 2021 | JP |
7183140 | Dec 2022 | JP |
10-2009-0057831 | Jun 2009 | KR |
1020130095613 | Aug 2013 | KR |
10-2015-0095115 | Aug 2015 | KR |
1020190056975 | May 2019 | KR |
1020190058193 | May 2019 | KR |
WO 2009033038 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2012093526 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO 2014194028 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2016112135 | Jul 2016 | WO |
WO 2018119070 | Jun 2018 | WO |
WO 2019098629 | May 2019 | WO |
WO 2019177461 | Sep 2019 | WO |
WO 2020013689 | Jan 2020 | WO |
WO 2020146475 | Jul 2020 | WO |
56203 | Aug 2006 | YU |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report dated Jul. 15, 2022 issued in counterpart Application No. 20738452.0, 8 pages. |
M. Pizzichemi et al., “A new method for depth of interaction determination in PET detectors”, 2016 Phys. Med. Biol. 61 4679, pp. 21. |
H. Uchida et al., “A novel single-ended readout depth of interaction PET detector fabricated using sub-surface laser engraving”, 2016 Phys. Med. Biol. 61 6635, pp. 17. |
G. Stringhini et al., “Development and evaluation of a practical method to measure the Depth of Interaction function for a single side readout PET detector”, . . . 2016 JINST 11 P11014, pp. 15. |
Y. Shao et al., “Development of a prototype PET scanner with depth-of-interaction measurement using solid-state photomultiplier arrays and parallel readout electronics” . . . 2014 Phys. Med. Biol. 59 1223, pp. 17. |
N. Inadama et al., “DOI PET Detectors with Scintillation Crystals Cut as Triangular Prisms”, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, © 2008 IEEE, pp. 3942-3945. |
S. Cuddy et al., “Effect of scintillator crystal geometry and surface finishing on depth of interaction resolution in PET detectors: Monte Carlo simulation and experimental . . . Results using silicon photomultipliers”, Proc. SPIE 7622, Medical Imaging 2010: Physics of Medical Imaging, 76221O (Mar. 22, 2010), pp. 9. |
E. Berg, PhD et al., “Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography”, © 2018 Elsevier Inc., pp. 311-331. |
L. Bläckberg et al., “Light Spread Manipulation in Scintillators Using Laser Induced Optical Barriers”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, . . . vol. 65, No. 8, Aug. 2018, pp. 8. |
L. Bläckberg et al., “Simulation study of light transport in laser-processed LYSO: Ce detectors with single-side readout”, 2017 Phys. Med. Biol. 62 8419, pp. 23. |
J. Kang et al., “Simulation study of PET detector configuration with thick light guide and GAPD array having large-area microcells for high effective quantum efficiency” . . . Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 131 (2016) 79-87, © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd., pp. 9. |
PCT/ISA/237 Written Opinion issued on PCT/US2020/012707, dated May 6, 2020, pp. 3. |
PCT/ISA/210 Search Report issued on PCT/US2020/012707, dated May 6, 2020, pp. 7. |
Makek, Mihael et al., “Scintillator Pixel Detectors for Measurement of Compton Scattering”, Condensed Matter, Feb. 15, 2019, pp. 13. |
Schmitz, Ruth E. et al., “The Physics of PET/CT scanners”, Physics, 2013, pp. 16. |
Marcinkowski, R. et al., “Optimized light sharing for high-resolution Tof Pet detector based on digital silicon photomultipliers”, Phys. Med. Biol. 59 (2014) 7125-7139. |
Song, Tae Yong et al., “A sub-millimeter resolution PET detector module using a multi-pixel photon counter array”, Phys. Med. Biol. 55 (2010) 2573-2587. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220120923 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62957991 | Jan 2020 | US | |
62789559 | Jan 2019 | US |