Private and secure optical communication system using an optical tapped delay line

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7720226
  • Patent Number
    7,720,226
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 19, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 18, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for secure transmission of an information-containing optical signal. An optical signal is divided into a first plurality of sub-bands. Each of the sub-bands is modified to encrypt the information contained in the optical signal. The modified sub-bands are combined into a combined optical signal. The combined optical signal is divided into a second plurality of sub-bands. Each of the second plurality of sub-bands is modified to decrypt the previously encrypted information contained in the optical signal.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to optical systems, including what may be referred to as optical communications systems, optical telecommunications systems and optical networks, and more particularly to a method and system for information security in an optical transmission system.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Optical telecommunications is a primary method of transporting information around the world. Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) technology has led to as many as 80 and 160 information-carrying wavelengths on a single fiber at bit rates as high as 10 and 40 gigabits per second per wavelength. While this increase in throughput and capacity is impressive, security is becoming increasingly important as the use of fiber optic WDM and free space optical telecommunication systems continue to expand.


Most existing methods of protecting an optical transmission encrypt a signal in the electrical domain before the signal is transferred to the optical layer. For example, in van Breeman et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,473,696, the data stream is enciphered by adding, modulo 2, a pseudorandom stream before transmission and recovering the data by addition of the same pseudorandom stream. Rutledge, U.S. Pat. No. 5,864,625, electronically encrypts the information and optically transmits a security key used for the encryption process. These types of protection systems are limited by the electronic processing rate, currently, no better than approximately 2.5 to 10 gigabits per second. Secondly, these electronic methods of protection are costly to implement and can create latency issues.


Brackett et al in U.S. Pat. No. 4,866,699 teaches an analog method of coding and decoding for multi-user communications based on optical frequency domain coding and decoding of coherently related spectral components. Brackett fails to address any secure or privacy communication applications where the spectral components are not coherently related.


In view of the foregoing, one object in accordance with the present invention is to improve optical communications security by providing an analog method of protecting transmissions that is lower in cost, volume, weight and/or power, especially at high transmission bit rates.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention, in a preferred embodiment, provides an analog method and apparatus for effectively protecting electronic communications that may be transmitted, for example, over a fiber optic or free-space network. In a preferred embodiment the present invention may use a combination of an Optical Tapped Delay Line (OTDL), as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,721 (which patent is incorporated herein by reference), with known methods of altering the properties of an analog signal.


A privacy system can be described as a system where the source signal is sufficiently protected to make unauthorized interception exceptionally difficult for the majority of potential adversaries, but not so difficult as to prevent interception by a sophisticated, well-funded and determined adversary, such as a government. A secure system is one in which the transmitted information signal is well protected against unauthorized intrusion by highly sophisticated adversaries having extensive computing resources. The security provided in accordance with the present invention can attain many levels of security, from a privacy system to a truly secure system, by, for example: (1) varying the number of sub-bands; (2) changing the analog properties of the sub-bands by altering the phase, introducing time delays, or shifting the originating signal's frequency components; and (3) controlling the periodicity of the changes.


The rate of signal transmission also affects the probability of signal interception. For example, a 10 gigabit per second signal is inherently more difficult to intercept than a 2.5 gigabit per second signal. The present invention, in a preferred embodiment, is capable of protecting optical signals at bit rates exceeding 1 gigabit per second.


A transmission using a preferred embodiment of the present invention is protected from an attack because any attack requires coherent detection of a large bandwidth of analog data at a high-precision digitization rate, and even if coherently intercepted, the properties of the signal are scrambled to the extent that recovery is virtually impossible. For example, an OTDL device with 128 sub-bands and 10 different phase shift combinations, requires a brute-force attack approaching 10128 tries to coherently recover the signal, a feat not possible with current analog-to-digital conversion technology combined with the fastest supercomputer. To make interception even less likely, the sub-band distortion pattern can be periodically changed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates an example of an Optical Tapped Delay Line (OTDL).



FIG. 2 illustrates an example of an operational side view of an OTDL device.



FIG. 3 illustrates an example of an operational side view of a preferred embodiment of the present invention operating in reflective mode.



FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a signal before, during and after transmission through a preferred embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a preferred embodiment of the present invention in transmissive mode.



FIG. 6 illustrates an example of an input carrier frequency shifting embodiment of the present invention in reflective mode.



FIG. 7 illustrates an example of an input carrier frequency shifting embodiment of the present invention in transmissive mode.



FIG. 8 illustrates an example of another embodiment of the present invention that uses two OTDL devices to obtain very high resolution sub-bands.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate examples of the previously referenced OTDL device for demultiplexing a multi-channel WDM band into individual channels. A detailed explanation of the device is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,721 (incorporated herein by reference), but the operation will be briefly outlined here to facilitate understanding of some preferred embodiments of the invention. In the illustrated example, six collimated input beams 230a-230f enter an Optical Tapped Delay Line (OTDL) 231. The origin of the beams may be, for example, the collimated outputs of six optical fibers (not shown) where each fiber typically carries multiple wavelengths. A fully reflective coating 232 on plate 235 and a partially reflective coating 236 on plate 237 cause each of the input beams entering the device to be multiply reflected within a cavity 233. A portion of each beam, a beamlet, exits the cavity at a plurality of taps 240a-f, with each succeeding exiting portion being time delayed with respect to the preceding portion.


The various output beams are then directed to an anamorphic optical system having a cylinder lens 242 and a spherical lens 245. The anamorphic optical system 242, 245 performs the functions of: 1) Fourier transformation of the output of the cavity 231 in the vertical dimension y, and 2) imaging of the output beams of the OTDL 231 in the horizontal dimension x onto an output surface 246. The outputs are imaged on plane 246 with each information-carrying wavelength focused at a specific spot on the plane. By properly placing detectors at plane 246, each WDM information channel may be detected for further processing.



FIG. 3 illustrates an example of an optical communications system in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. This embodiment includes a transmitter 50 and a receiver 52. A fiber 56 carrying an information-carrying optical signal is received by the OTDL 58. The light is processed as described in the explanation for FIGS. 1 and 2. The beamlets exit the OTDL from optical tap locations 54a to 54g and a lens system 60 interferes the beamlets onto a planar reflective phase modulator array 62. Passage through the OTDL 58 and lens 60 to the plane 62 has split the information-carrying optical signal into a number of sub-bands. The OTDL can be designed to output at least hundreds of sub-bands.


The reflective phase modulator array 62 may be implemented in a number of ways, including, but not limited to, a liquid crystal array, a MEMS device, or an array of III-V or II-VI semiconductor devices. The speed at which the phase shifting changes may directly affect the level of security afforded. In this example one modulator element is associated with each sub-band. As each sub-band passes through a modulator element, it is phase shifted in a manner determined by the control computer 64. The mirror part of the modulator array 62 reflects the sub-bands back through lens system 60 to tap locations 57a to 57g. The OTDL 58 recombines the taps into an optical signal for retransmission over a fiber optic carrier 76 to the destination.


The signal from transmitter 50 is received by OTDL 72 from fiber 76. The OTDL 72 and lens 70 combination is identical to the OTDL 58 and lens 60 combination. OTDL 72 and lens 70 separate the signal into the identical sub-bands created by OTDL 58 and lens 60. The sub-bands are imaged onto the reflective phase modulator array 68, with each array element receiving the same sub-band as the corresponding modulator in array 62. The control computer 66 causes each sub-band to be phase shifted in the opposite manner as instructed by control computer 64. Each sub-band is then reflected back through lens system 70 to OTDL 72 which together recombine the sub-bands into a single signal that is output to fiber 74 for further processing or routing.


The effect of imparting a phase shift to each sub-band is to introduce distortion. If the amount of distortion is sufficient, the information content becomes undecipherable and security is enhanced. The control computer 64 instructs the modulator array how to modify the phase of the sub-bands in a manner that is unpredictable to anyone not having knowledge of the computer input. The rate at which the phase shifts are changed depends upon the level of security required. A fixed phase shift pattern will sufficiently distort the signal to make it incomprehensible; however, determined interceptors can analyze the signal and eventually determine, and reverse the effects of, the phase shift pattern. To ensure continued security, the fixed phase shift pattern can be changed occasionally, requiring the potential interceptor to start the analysis over again. For the highest security, this change must be made often enough to guarantee that even with the highest performance computational systems anticipated, the phase shifts do not remain static long enough for any known analysis to succeed before the pattern changes. A secure system will result if the phase shifter array settings 62 and 68 in FIG. 3 are changed at least as fast as twice the time aperture required for an interceptor to compute the settings.


Preferably, the computer input to the phase modulators may be derived from a deterministic algorithm, the starting point of which may be derived from a key setting provided to the computer. This permits a receiver having knowledge of both the algorithm and the key setting to reproduce the same control computer signal, and thereby, reverse the phase distortions and recover the information signal intact.


For purposes of illustrating the principles of this embodiment of the invention, only a single signal or channel has been described. However, using the multi-port interleaving capability of the OTDL, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,721 (incorporated herein by reference), embodiments in accordance with the present invention are capable of simultaneously encrypting all channels of a multi-channel WDM communications system. As used herein the term “encrypting” includes all levels of security from low-security to the highest levels of certified security.


For the illustrated embodiment of the present invention to be optimally effective, the sub-band resolution, i.e., the spacing between each sub-band at focal plane 62 of the OTDL in FIG. 3, should be significantly finer, preferably at least 10 times finer, and more preferably at least 50 times finer, than the bandwidth of the input signal. In this particular embodiment, for example, if the input signal has a bit rate of 10 gigabits per second, the design of the OTDL should be at least 50 sub-bands with a spatial resolution at the focal plane of 200 MHz or finer.


Each array element may see a portion of the signal in the frequency domain, defined by the equation:







F


(

t
,
K

)


=




ω
K


ω

K
+
1







0
T




f


(

S
+
t

)





jωS








S








ω








where

    • i. t=aperture of the hyperfine device (tap key)
    • ii. S=time integration variable
    • iii. ω=frequency
    • iv. K=sub-band index


Defining







Ψ


(

ω




,
t

)


=



0
T




f


(

S
+
t

)












S









S







as a sliding Fourier transform (e.g., block of data), Ψ(ω,t) may be perceived as that spectral component of the information signal incident on an element of the reflective phase shifter.


In a preferred embodiment, the present invention imparts a phase shift to each spectral component hitting a specific array element. Specifically, each array element sees a signal defined as a complex number

Ae

where φ is the entity to be altered by the phase shifter of the invention. In another embodiment, it would be possible to alter A (amplitude) instead of φ, but doing so would result in a loss of power and, potentially, information content. Altering φ does not produce a power loss, nor is any information content lost.



FIG. 4 is a simulated example illustrating the transmission of the signal in FIG. 3. 57 is a representation of the original signal carried on fiber 56. After being phase shifted by transmitter 50, the transmitted and distorted signal appears as shown by 77. After passing through receiver 52, the signal is output on fiber 74 and appears as shown by 75, identical to the incoming original signal 57.


The embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3 is a reflective architecture of the present invention that utilizes the reversibility property of an OTDL, whereby, only one OTDL device is used for transmitting and receiving. An alternative embodiment of the present invention is a transmissive architecture illustrated in FIG. 5 where two OTDL devices comprise the transmitter 200 and two OTDL devices comprise the receiver 210. The phase shifter arrays 84 and 94 for this architecture are transmissive versus reflective. OTDL 100 combines the distorted signal into a signal for transmission on fiber 90. This signal is received by OTDL 101 from fiber 90 and, together with lens 60, separates the signal into the identical sub-bands created by OTDL 99 and lens 61. These sub-bands are passed through the transmissive phase shifter 94 and to lens 87 and OTDL 102 for recombining as the original undistorted signal.


As mentioned earlier, there are two other possible types of distortion techniques: (1) introduction of a random time delay; or (2) frequency shifting the sub-bands. A signal delay could be created by a coil, white cell, loop in a waveguide, or other types of free space delay. There are many methods to shift the frequency of an optical signal, such as using stimulated Brillouin Scattering, four wave mixing, three wave mixing, or use of any optical modulator device, such as a lithium niobate Mach-Zender, indium phosphide electroabsorption, electroabsorption multi-quantum well or an electrorefraction device. Note that the values of the frequency shifts applied must meet other constraints in order to be feasible for the embodiment used. Each of the three methods of signal distortion could be used independently or in any combination to produce a private or secure optical transmission system.


Another preferred embodiment of the present invention involves destroying the coherence of the input carrier by shifting the frequency of the input source. Again, any of the previously mentioned in-line distortion techniques could be used in combination with this method. FIG. 6 shows an example of a reflective architecture in accordance with this method. FIG. 7 shows an example of a transmissive architecture in accordance with this method.


As illustrated in the example of FIG. 1, the OTDL may be a two-dimensional device, i.e., the OTDL may sub-channelize an optical signal from multiple fiber optic inputs shown as 230a through 230f producing a matrix of sub-bands and input fibers at the focal plane. Another method to obtain a higher level of security may be to use the previously described methods of distorting the sub-bands but also send the sub-bands out on differing outputs.


A further enhancement in security may be obtained using an OTDL in the architecture described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,721 B1 (incorporated herein by reference) and shown in FIG. 8, where OTDL 160 is rotated 90 degrees from the orientation of a first OTDL 150. The first OTDL generates a coarse sub-banding. The second OTDL further subdivides each sub-band into finer sub-bands. This architecture creates a large number of very fine sub-bands of the incoming signal. The distortion methods previously discussed could be applied to each of the sub-bands at location 170. The very finely and distorted sub-bands could be recombined into a signal using the transmissive or reflective architecture disclosed previously for transmission to the destination. A receiver architecture using the design in FIG. 8 would separate the very fine sub-bands, reverse the distortion and recombine the undistorted sub-bands into a signal.

Claims
  • 1. A method for secure transmission of an information-containing optical signal in a reflective/transmissive architecture, comprising: dividing the optical signal using an optical tapped delay line into a first plurality of spectral sub-bands defined by the equation:
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the information-containing optical signal has a bandwidth and at least one of the first and second plurality of spectral sub-bands has a sub-band resolution at least 50 times finer than the bandwidth of the information-containing optical signal.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the information-containing optical signal is transmitted at a bit rate of not less than 1 gigabit per second.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the information-containing optical signal is transmitted at a bit rate of not less than 10 gigabits per second, wherein at least the first plurality of spectral sub-bands comprise not less than 50 spectral sub-bands and wherein at least the first plurality of spectral sub-bands has a spatial resolution at a focal plane of not greater than 200 MHz.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the first plurality of spectral sub-bands comprise not less than 100 spectral sub-bands.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of the steps of modifying each of the first plurality of spectral sub-bands and modifying each of the second plurality of spectral sub-bands comprises at least one of imparting a phase shift to each sub-band, imparting a time delay to each sub-band, and imparting a frequency shift to each sub-band.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 comprising at least one of imparting a phase shift to each sub-band, imparting a time delay to each sub-band, and imparting a frequency shift to each sub-band at a rate that changes over time.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 comprising imparting a frequency shift to the information-containing optical signal.
  • 9. A system for secure transmission of an information-containing optical signal, comprising: at least a first optical tapped delay line configured to enable division of the optical signal into a first plurality of spectral sub-bands defined by the equation:
  • 10. The system of claim 9 comprising: at least a third optical tapped delay line configured to enable division of each of the first plurality of spectral sub-bands into a plurality of finer spectral sub-bands, and wherein at least the first phase modulator is configured to enable modification of each of the plurality of finer spectral sub-bands to encrypt the information contained in the optical signal.
  • 11. The system of claim 9 wherein at least one of the first and second phase modulator comprises a reflective phase modulating array.
  • 12. The system of claim 9 wherein at least one of the first and second phase modulator comprises a transmissive phase modulating array.
  • 13. The system of claim 9 comprising at least one computer for controlling at least one of modification of the first plurality of spectral sub-bands by the first phase modulator and modification of the second plurality of spectral sub-bands by the second phase modulator.
  • 14. The system of claim 9 wherein at least one of the first and second phase modulator comprises at least one of a liquid crystal array, a micro-electromechanical systems device, an array of III-V or II-VI semiconductor devices.
  • 15. The system of claim 9 wherein at least a first pair of optical tapped delay lines configured to enable division of the optical signal into a first plurality of spectral sub-bands,at least a second pair of optical tapped delay lines configured to enable division of the combined optical signal into a second plurality of spectral sub-bands,wherein at least one of the first and second phase modulator comprises a transmissive phase modulating array.
US Referenced Citations (71)
Number Name Date Kind
4359736 Lewis Nov 1982 A
4448529 Krause May 1984 A
4474424 Wagner Oct 1984 A
4577933 Yip et al. Mar 1986 A
4588255 Tur et al. May 1986 A
4588260 Horner May 1986 A
4723829 Koonen Feb 1988 A
4765714 Horner et al. Aug 1988 A
4769537 Taillebois et al. Sep 1988 A
4779266 Chung et al. Oct 1988 A
4866699 Brackett et al. Sep 1989 A
4871232 Grinberg et al. Oct 1989 A
4926412 Jannson et al. May 1990 A
4933990 Mochizuki et al. Jun 1990 A
5024508 Horner Jun 1991 A
5172258 Verber Dec 1992 A
5191614 LeCong Mar 1993 A
5274488 Udd Dec 1993 A
5311360 Bloom et al. May 1994 A
5351324 Forman Sep 1994 A
5377182 Monacos Dec 1994 A
5390046 Gesell et al. Feb 1995 A
5394489 Koch Feb 1995 A
5408319 Halbout et al. Apr 1995 A
5473696 Van Breemen et al. Dec 1995 A
5479026 Schumtz et al. Dec 1995 A
5541756 Chang-Hasnain et al. Jul 1996 A
5546209 Willner et al. Aug 1996 A
5677762 Ortyn et al. Oct 1997 A
5680104 Slemon et al. Oct 1997 A
5786915 Scobey Jul 1998 A
5793871 Jackson Aug 1998 A
5835517 Jayaraman et al. Nov 1998 A
5852505 Li Dec 1998 A
5864625 Rutledge Jan 1999 A
5881079 Doerr et al. Mar 1999 A
5903648 Javidi May 1999 A
5930045 Shirasaki Jul 1999 A
5946331 Amersfoort et al. Aug 1999 A
5969865 Shirasaki Oct 1999 A
5969866 Shirasaki Oct 1999 A
5973838 Shirasaki Oct 1999 A
5991079 Furlani et al. Nov 1999 A
5999320 Shirasaki Dec 1999 A
6002773 Javidi Dec 1999 A
6018582 Francois et al. Jan 2000 A
6028706 Shirasaki et al. Feb 2000 A
6046715 Towler et al. Apr 2000 A
6046854 Bhagavatula Apr 2000 A
6114994 Soref et al. Sep 2000 A
6130971 Cao Oct 2000 A
6144494 Shirasaki et al. Nov 2000 A
6160651 Chang et al. Dec 2000 A
6169630 Shirasaki et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185040 Shirasaki et al. Feb 2001 B1
6219161 Chang et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233075 Chang et al. May 2001 B1
6271946 Chang et al. Aug 2001 B1
6380547 Gonzalez et al. Apr 2002 B1
6411417 Roberts et al. Jun 2002 B1
6519340 Javidi Feb 2003 B1
6608721 Turpin et al. Aug 2003 B1
6810165 Golub et al. Oct 2004 B2
6858864 Atanackovic et al. Feb 2005 B2
7146109 Chen et al. Dec 2006 B2
7158185 Gastaldi Jan 2007 B2
7184553 Mahlab et al. Feb 2007 B2
20010028758 Abbott et al. Oct 2001 A1
20030128845 Kudumakis Jul 2003 A1
20030147533 Mahlab et al. Aug 2003 A1
20060291859 Young et al. Dec 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (27)
Number Date Country
0090771 Oct 1983 EP
0 881 527 Dec 1998 EP
1 001 287 May 2000 EP
10-256663 Sep 1998 JP
11-095061 Apr 1999 JP
11-101923 Apr 1999 JP
11-119173 Apr 1999 JP
11-171608 Jun 1999 JP
11-174268 Jul 1999 JP
11-202151 Jul 1999 JP
11-223745 Aug 1999 JP
11-258413 Sep 1999 JP
11-511568 Oct 1999 JP
11-326687 Nov 1999 JP
11-513138 Nov 1999 JP
11-352356 Dec 1999 JP
2000-028849 Jan 2000 JP
2000-075165 Mar 2000 JP
2000-111831 Apr 2000 JP
2000-147280 May 2000 JP
2000-147305 May 2000 JP
2000-171649 Jun 2000 JP
WO9939464 May 1999 WO
WO-9939411 Aug 1999 WO
WO-0022741 Apr 2000 WO
WO03023980 Oct 2002 WO
WO-03023980 Mar 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040264695 A1 Dec 2004 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60427249 Nov 2002 US