Pro-actively preparing a dispersed storage network memory for higher-loads

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10579451
  • Patent Number
    10,579,451
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 19, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 3, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A method for execution by one or more processing modules of one or more computing devices of a dispersed storage network (DSN), the method begins by maintaining dispersed storage network (DSN) storage and maintenance loading information. The method continues by estimating a future data access task rate and determining a probability level of potential future data loss based on the estimated future data access task rate. The method continues, when the probability level of the potential future data loss compares unfavorably to a maximum probability of data loss threshold level, by facilitating execution of a preventative data loss mitigation process and when a current data access task rate is greater than a maximum task rate level, suspending the execution of the preventative data loss mitigation process.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.


INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF MATERIAL SUBMITTED ON A COMPACT DISC

Not applicable.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Technical Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to computer networks and more particularly to dispersing error encoded data.


Description of Related Art

Computing devices are known to communicate data, process data, and/or store data. Such computing devices range from wireless smart phones, laptops, tablets, personal computers (PC), work stations, and video game devices, to data centers that support millions of web searches, stock trades, or on-line purchases every day. In general, a computing device includes a central processing unit (CPU), a memory system, user input/output interfaces, peripheral device interfaces, and an interconnecting bus structure.


As is further known, a computer may effectively extend its CPU by using “cloud computing” to perform one or more computing functions (e.g., a service, an application, an algorithm, an arithmetic logic function, etc.) on behalf of the computer. Further, for large services, applications, and/or functions, cloud computing may be performed by multiple cloud computing resources in a distributed manner to improve the response time for completion of the service, application, and/or function. For example, Hadoop is an open source software framework that supports distributed applications enabling application execution by thousands of computers.


In addition to cloud computing, a computer may use “cloud storage” as part of its memory system. As is known, cloud storage enables a user, via its computer, to store files, applications, etc. on an Internet storage system. The Internet storage system may include a RAID (redundant array of independent disks) system and/or a dispersed storage system that uses an error correction scheme to encode data for storage.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)


FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a dispersed or distributed storage network (DSN) in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a computing core in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storage error encoding of data in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of a generic example of an error encoding function in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a specific example of an error encoding function in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of an example of a slice name of an encoded data slice (EDS) in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 7 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storage error decoding of data in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a schematic block diagram of a generic example of an error decoding function in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of a dispersed storage network (DSN) in accordance with the present invention; and



FIG. 9A is a flowchart illustrating an example of improving a data retrieval reliability level in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION


FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a dispersed, or distributed, storage network (DSN) 10 that includes a plurality of computing devices 12-16, a managing unit 18, an integrity processing unit 20, and a DSN memory 22. The components of the DSN 10 are coupled to a network 24, which may include one or more wireless and/or wire lined communication systems; one or more non-public intranet systems and/or public internet systems; and/or one or more local area networks (LAN) and/or wide area networks (WAN).


The DSN memory 22 includes a plurality of storage units 36 that may be located at geographically different sites (e.g., one in Chicago, one in Milwaukee, etc.), at a common site, or a combination thereof. For example, if the DSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, each storage unit is located at a different site. As another example, if the DSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, all eight storage units are located at the same site. As yet another example, if the DSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, a first pair of storage units are at a first common site, a second pair of storage units are at a second common site, a third pair of storage units are at a third common site, and a fourth pair of storage units are at a fourth common site. Note that a DSN memory 22 may include more or less than eight storage units 36. Further note that each storage unit 36 includes a computing core (as shown in FIG. 2, or components thereof) and a plurality of memory devices for storing dispersed error encoded data.


Each of the computing devices 12-16, the managing unit 18, and the integrity processing unit 20 include a computing core 26, which includes network interfaces 30-33. Computing devices 12-16 may each be a portable computing device and/or a fixed computing device. A portable computing device may be a social networking device, a gaming device, a cell phone, a smart phone, a digital assistant, a digital music player, a digital video player, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a tablet, a video game controller, and/or any other portable device that includes a computing core. A fixed computing device may be a computer (PC), a computer server, a cable set-top box, a satellite receiver, a television set, a printer, a fax machine, home entertainment equipment, a video game console, and/or any type of home or office computing equipment. Note that each of the managing unit 18 and the integrity processing unit 20 may be separate computing devices, may be a common computing device, and/or may be integrated into one or more of the computing devices 12-16 and/or into one or more of the storage units 36.


Each interface 30, 32, and 33 includes software and hardware to support one or more communication links via the network 24 indirectly and/or directly. For example, interface 30 supports a communication link (e.g., wired, wireless, direct, via a LAN, via the network 24, etc.) between computing devices 14 and 16. As another example, interface 32 supports communication links (e.g., a wired connection, a wireless connection, a LAN connection, and/or any other type of connection to/from the network 24) between computing devices 12 & 16 and the DSN memory 22. As yet another example, interface 33 supports a communication link for each of the managing unit 18 and the integrity processing unit 20 to the network 24.


Computing devices 12 and 16 include a dispersed storage (DS) client module 34, which enables the computing device to dispersed storage error encode and decode data as subsequently described with reference to one or more of FIGS. 3-9A. In this example embodiment, computing device 16 functions as a dispersed storage processing agent for computing device 14. In this role, computing device 16 dispersed storage error encodes and decodes data on behalf of computing device 14. With the use of dispersed storage error encoding and decoding, the DSN 10 is tolerant of a significant number of storage unit failures (the number of failures is based on parameters of the dispersed storage error encoding function) without loss of data and without the need for a redundant or backup copies of the data. Further, the DSN 10 stores data for an indefinite period of time without data loss and in a secure manner (e.g., the system is very resistant to unauthorized attempts at accessing the data).


In operation, the managing unit 18 performs DS management services. For example, the managing unit 18 establishes distributed data storage parameters (e.g., vault creation, distributed storage parameters, security parameters, billing information, user profile information, etc.) for computing devices 12-14 individually or as part of a group of user devices. As a specific example, the managing unit 18 coordinates creation of a vault (e.g., a virtual memory block associated with a portion of an overall namespace of the DSN) within the DSTN memory 22 for a user device, a group of devices, or for public access and establishes per vault dispersed storage (DS) error encoding parameters for a vault. The managing unit 18 facilitates storage of DS error encoding parameters for each vault by updating registry information of the DSN 10, where the registry information may be stored in the DSN memory 22, a computing device 12-16, the managing unit 18, and/or the integrity processing unit 20.


The DSN managing unit 18 creates and stores user profile information (e.g., an access control list (ACL)) in local memory and/or within memory of the DSN memory 22. The user profile information includes authentication information, permissions, and/or the security parameters. The security parameters may include encryption/decryption scheme, one or more encryption keys, key generation scheme, and/or data encoding/decoding scheme.


The DSN managing unit 18 creates billing information for a particular user, a user group, a vault access, public vault access, etc. For instance, the DSTN managing unit 18 tracks the number of times a user accesses a non-public vault and/or public vaults, which can be used to generate per-access billing information. In another instance, the DSTN managing unit 18 tracks the amount of data stored and/or retrieved by a user device and/or a user group, which can be used to generate per-data-amount billing information.


As another example, the managing unit 18 performs network operations, network administration, and/or network maintenance. Network operations includes authenticating user data allocation requests (e.g., read and/or write requests), managing creation of vaults, establishing authentication credentials for user devices, adding/deleting components (e.g., user devices, storage units, and/or computing devices with a DS client module 34) to/from the DSN 10, and/or establishing authentication credentials for the storage units 36. Network administration includes monitoring devices and/or units for failures, maintaining vault information, determining device and/or unit activation status, determining device and/or unit loading, and/or determining any other system level operation that affects the performance level of the DSN 10. Network maintenance includes facilitating replacing, upgrading, repairing, and/or expanding a device and/or unit of the DSN 10.


The integrity processing unit 20 performs rebuilding of ‘bad’ or missing encoded data slices. At a high level, the integrity processing unit 20 performs rebuilding by periodically attempting to retrieve/list encoded data slices, and/or slice names of the encoded data slices, from the DSN memory 22. For retrieved encoded slices, they are checked for errors due to data corruption, outdated version, etc. If a slice includes an error, it is flagged as a ‘bad’ slice. For encoded data slices that were not received and/or not listed, they are flagged as missing slices. Bad and/or missing slices are subsequently rebuilt using other retrieved encoded data slices that are deemed to be good slices to produce rebuilt slices. The rebuilt slices are stored in the DSTN memory 22.



FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a computing core 26 that includes a processing module 50, a memory controller 52, main memory 54, a video graphics processing unit 55, an input/output (TO) controller 56, a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) interface 58, an IO interface module 60, at least one IO device interface module 62, a read only memory (ROM) basic input output system (BIOS) 64, and one or more memory interface modules. The one or more memory interface module(s) includes one or more of a universal serial bus (USB) interface module 66, a host bus adapter (HBA) interface module 68, a network interface module 70, a flash interface module 72, a hard drive interface module 74, and a DSN interface module 76.


The DSN interface module 76 functions to mimic a conventional operating system (OS) file system interface (e.g., network file system (NFS), flash file system (FFS), disk file system (DFS), file transfer protocol (FTP), web-based distributed authoring and versioning (WebDAV), etc.) and/or a block memory interface (e.g., small computer system interface (SCSI), internet small computer system interface (iSCSI), etc.). The DSN interface module 76 and/or the network interface module 70 may function as one or more of the interface 30-33 of FIG. 1. Note that the IO device interface module 62 and/or the memory interface modules 66-76 may be collectively or individually referred to as IO ports.



FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storage error encoding of data. When a computing device 12 or 16 has data to store it disperse storage error encodes the data in accordance with a dispersed storage error encoding process based on dispersed storage error encoding parameters. The dispersed storage error encoding parameters include an encoding function (e.g., information dispersal algorithm, Reed-Solomon, Cauchy Reed-Solomon, systematic encoding, non-systematic encoding, on-line codes, etc.), a data segmenting protocol (e.g., data segment size, fixed, variable, etc.), and per data segment encoding values. The per data segment encoding values include a total, or pillar width, number (T) of encoded data slices per encoding of a data segment i.e., in a set of encoded data slices); a decode threshold number (D) of encoded data slices of a set of encoded data slices that are needed to recover the data segment; a read threshold number (R) of encoded data slices to indicate a number of encoded data slices per set to be read from storage for decoding of the data segment; and/or a write threshold number (W) to indicate a number of encoded data slices per set that must be accurately stored before the encoded data segment is deemed to have been properly stored. The dispersed storage error encoding parameters may further include slicing information (e.g., the number of encoded data slices that will be created for each data segment) and/or slice security information (e.g., per encoded data slice encryption, compression, integrity checksum, etc.).


In the present example, Cauchy Reed-Solomon has been selected as the encoding function (a generic example is shown in FIG. 4 and a specific example is shown in FIG. 5); the data segmenting protocol is to divide the data object into fixed sized data segments; and the per data segment encoding values include: a pillar width of 5, a decode threshold of 3, a read threshold of 4, and a write threshold of 4. In accordance with the data segmenting protocol, the computing device 12 or 16 divides the data (e.g., a file (e.g., text, video, audio, etc.), a data object, or other data arrangement) into a plurality of fixed sized data segments (e.g., 1 through Y of a fixed size in range of Kilo-bytes to Tera-bytes or more). The number of data segments created is dependent of the size of the data and the data segmenting protocol.


The computing device 12 or 16 then disperse storage error encodes a data segment using the selected encoding function (e.g., Cauchy Reed-Solomon) to produce a set of encoded data slices. FIG. 4 illustrates a generic Cauchy Reed-Solomon encoding function, which includes an encoding matrix (EM), a data matrix (DM), and a coded matrix (CM). The size of the encoding matrix (EM) is dependent on the pillar width number (T) and the decode threshold number (D) of selected per data segment encoding values. To produce the data matrix (DM), the data segment is divided into a plurality of data blocks and the data blocks are arranged into D number of rows with Z data blocks per row. Note that Z is a function of the number of data blocks created from the data segment and the decode threshold number (D). The coded matrix is produced by matrix multiplying the data matrix by the encoding matrix.



FIG. 5 illustrates a specific example of Cauchy Reed-Solomon encoding with a pillar number (T) of five and decode threshold number of three. In this example, a first data segment is divided into twelve data blocks (D1-D12). The coded matrix includes five rows of coded data blocks, where the first row of X11-X14 corresponds to a first encoded data slice (EDS 1_1), the second row of X21-X24 corresponds to a second encoded data slice (EDS 2_1), the third row of X31-X34 corresponds to a third encoded data slice (EDS 3_1), the fourth row of X41-X44 corresponds to a fourth encoded data slice (EDS 4_1), and the fifth row of X51-X54 corresponds to a fifth encoded data slice (EDS 5_1). Note that the second number of the EDS designation corresponds to the data segment number.


Returning to the discussion of FIG. 3, the computing device also creates a slice name (SN) for each encoded data slice (EDS) in the set of encoded data slices. A typical format for a slice name 60 is shown in FIG. 6. As shown, the slice name (SN) 60 includes a pillar number of the encoded data slice (e.g., one of 1-T), a data segment number (e.g., one of 1-Y), a vault identifier (ID), a data object identifier (ID), and may further include revision level information of the encoded data slices. The slice name functions as, at least part of, a DSN address for the encoded data slice for storage and retrieval from the DSN memory 22.


As a result of encoding, the computing device 12 or 16 produces a plurality of sets of encoded data slices, which are provided with their respective slice names to the storage units for storage. As shown, the first set of encoded data slices includes EDS 1_1 through EDS 5_1 and the first set of slice names includes SN 1_1 through SN 5_1 and the last set of encoded data slices includes EDS 1_Y through EDS 5_Y and the last set of slice names includes SN 1_Y through SN 5_Y.



FIG. 7 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storage error decoding of a data object that was dispersed storage error encoded and stored in the example of FIG. 4. In this example, the computing device 12 or 16 retrieves from the storage units at least the decode threshold number of encoded data slices per data segment. As a specific example, the computing device retrieves a read threshold number of encoded data slices.


To recover a data segment from a decode threshold number of encoded data slices, the computing device uses a decoding function as shown in FIG. 8. As shown, the decoding function is essentially an inverse of the encoding function of FIG. 4. The coded matrix includes a decode threshold number of rows (e.g., three in this example) and the decoding matrix in an inversion of the encoding matrix that includes the corresponding rows of the coded matrix. For example, if the coded matrix includes rows 1, 2, and 4, the encoding matrix is reduced to rows 1, 2, and 4, and then inverted to produce the decoding matrix.


Under higher than normal loads, data access requests come in at a much higher rate than normal, and may cause maintenance operations (rebuilding, migrating, rebalancing, integrity checking, etc.) to be reduced or slowed in order to keep up with the load imposed on the system. This, coupled with the higher load, higher temperatures, possibly overclocked processors, higher power draw, increased vibration, etc. may induce a higher failure rate and subject data in the DSN memory to higher risk (exacerbated by the reduced resources available for rebuilding). In one embodiment, to mitigate the damage, and reduce the probability of data loss, the DSN may have a mode to proactively prepare itself to achieve the greatest possible health in advance of the peak load, e.g., to deprioritize client operations such that rebuild, and other maintenance tasks can get the data to full health in advance of the load. Other embodiments include temporary increasing write threshold or performance thresholds to reduce the number of slices to be rebuilt. By doing all necessary rebuilding in advance of the period of lessened rebuilding the data has the highest likelihood of coming out unscathed from the peak period.



FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of a dispersed storage network (DSN) that includes the distributed storage and task (DST) processing unit 16 (computing device) of FIG. 1, the network 24 of FIG. 1, and a set of DST execution (EX) units 1-n. The DST processing unit 16 includes the DST client module 34 of FIG. 1 and memory 88. Each DST execution unit may be implemented utilizing the DST execution unit 36 (storage units (SU)) of FIG. 1.


The DSN functions to improve a data retrieval reliability level with regards to retrieving data stored in the set of DST execution units 1-n. In an example of operation of the improving of the data retrieval reliability level, the DST client module 34 maintains DSN loading information 502 while processing data access requests 500 (e.g., store data request, retrieve data requests) and facilitating execution of maintenance tasks (e.g., scanning for storage errors, rebuilding data associated with the detected storage errors). For example, the DST client module 34 tracks rates of data access and maintenance tasks versus time and stores the DSN loading information 502 in memory 88.


While maintaining the DSN loading information 502, the DST client module 34 estimates a future data access task rate. The estimating may be based on one or more of the DSN loading information 502, interpreting a task queue, obtaining current loading rates, interpreting a schedule, or interpreting a message. Having estimated the future data access task rate, the DST client module 34 determines a probability of future data loss based on the estimated future data access task rate. The determining includes at least one of estimating future capacity for execution of maintenance tasks based on the estimated future data access rate (e.g., during expected future access peaks) or estimating impact on data retrieval reliability levels based on the estimated future capacity for execution of maintenance tasks.


Having determined the probability of potential future data loss, the DST client module 34, when the probability of potential future data loss compares unfavorably to a maximum probability of data loss threshold level and while a current data access task rate is less than a maximum rate level, facilitates execution of a preventative data loss mitigation process. The facilitating includes at least one of updating dispersal parameters to include a larger write threshold number to minimize addition of future rebuilding tasks, accelerating schedule maintenance tasks, raising a priority level of execution of maintenance tasks, or temporarily de-prioritizing priority levels of execution of data access tasks (e.g., receive data access requests 500, issue slice access requests 504, receive slice access responses 506, and issue data access responses 508).


When the current data access task rate is greater than the maximum rate level (e.g., detecting a peak loading time frame of data access requests), the DST client module 34 suspends execution of the preventative data loss mitigation process. The facilitating includes one or more of resuming use of a previous set of dispersal parameters to include a smaller read threshold number to minimize data access delays, de-accelerating scheduled maintenance tasks, lowering a priority level of execution of maintenance task, or temporarily prioritizing priority levels of execution of data access tasks.



FIG. 9A is a flowchart illustrating an example of improving a data retrieval reliability level. The method includes step 516 where a processing module (e.g., of a distributed storage and task (DST) client module) maintains dispersed storage network (DSN) loading information. For example, the processing module stores rates of data access (e.g., store data request, retrieve data requests) and maintenance tasks versus time in a local memory. The method continues at step 518 where the processing module estimates a future data access task rate. The estimating includes generating the future data access task rate based on one or more of the DSN loading information, interpreting a task queue, interpreting current loading rates, interpreting a schedule, or interpreting the message.


The method continues at step 520 where the processing module determines a probability level of potential future data loss based on the estimated future data access task rate. The determining includes at least one of estimating a future capacity for execution of maintenance tasks based on the estimated future data access rate (e.g., during expected future access peaks) or estimating a data retrieval reliability level based on the estimated future capacity for execution of maintenance tasks (e.g., scanning for storage errors, rebuilding data associated with the detected storage errors).


When the probability level of the potential future data loss compares unfavorably to a maximum probability of data loss threshold level, the method continues at step 522 where the processing module facilitates execution of a preventative data loss mitigation process. The facilitating includes one or more of storing additional slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices (e.g., increase a write threshold number), prioritizing maintenance tasks, or a de-prioritizing of data access tasks.


When a current data access task rate is greater than a maximum task rate level (e.g., detecting a peak loading time frame of data access requests), the method continues at step 524 where the processing module suspends the execution of the preventative data loss mitigation process. The suspending includes one or more of storing fewer slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices (e.g., decreasing the read threshold number), de-prioritizing maintenance tasks, or prioritizing data access tasks (e.g., receive data access requests 500, issue slice access requests 504, receive slice access responses 506, and issue data access responses 508).


The method described above in conjunction with the processing module can alternatively be performed by other modules of the dispersed storage network or by other computing devices. In addition, at least one memory section (e.g., a non-transitory computer readable storage medium) that stores operational instructions can, when executed by one or more processing modules of one or more computing devices of the dispersed storage network (DSN), cause the one or more computing devices to perform any or all of the method steps described above.


It is noted that terminologies as may be used herein such as bit stream, stream, signal sequence, etc. (or their equivalents) have been used interchangeably to describe digital information whose content corresponds to any of a number of desired types (e.g., data, video, speech, audio, etc. any of which may generally be referred to as ‘data’).


As may be used herein, the terms “substantially” and “approximately” provides an industry-accepted tolerance for its corresponding term and/or relativity between items. Such an industry-accepted tolerance ranges from less than one percent to fifty percent and corresponds to, but is not limited to, component values, integrated circuit process variations, temperature variations, rise and fall times, and/or thermal noise. Such relativity between items ranges from a difference of a few percent to magnitude differences. As may also be used herein, the term(s) “configured to”, “operably coupled to”, “coupled to”, and/or “coupling” includes direct coupling between items and/or indirect coupling between items via an intervening item (e.g., an item includes, but is not limited to, a component, an element, a circuit, and/or a module) where, for an example of indirect coupling, the intervening item does not modify the information of a signal but may adjust its current level, voltage level, and/or power level. As may further be used herein, inferred coupling (i.e., where one element is coupled to another element by inference) includes direct and indirect coupling between two items in the same manner as “coupled to”. As may even further be used herein, the term “configured to”, “operable to”, “coupled to”, or “operably coupled to” indicates that an item includes one or more of power connections, input(s), output(s), etc., to perform, when activated, one or more its corresponding functions and may further include inferred coupling to one or more other items. As may still further be used herein, the term “associated with”, includes direct and/or indirect coupling of separate items and/or one item being embedded within another item.


As may be used herein, the term “compares favorably”, indicates that a comparison between two or more items, signals, etc., provides a desired relationship. For example, when the desired relationship is that signal 1 has a greater magnitude than signal 2, a favorable comparison may be achieved when the magnitude of signal 1 is greater than that of signal 2 or when the magnitude of signal 2 is less than that of signal 1. As may be used herein, the term “compares unfavorably”, indicates that a comparison between two or more items, signals, etc., fails to provide the desired relationship.


As may also be used herein, the terms “processing module”, “processing circuit”, “processor”, and/or “processing unit” may be a single processing device or a plurality of processing devices. Such a processing device may be a microprocessor, micro-controller, digital signal processor, microcomputer, central processing unit, field programmable gate array, programmable logic device, state machine, logic circuitry, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or any device that manipulates signals (analog and/or digital) based on hard coding of the circuitry and/or operational instructions. The processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit may be, or further include, memory and/or an integrated memory element, which may be a single memory device, a plurality of memory devices, and/or embedded circuitry of another processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit. Such a memory device may be a read-only memory, random access memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, static memory, dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory, and/or any device that stores digital information. Note that if the processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit includes more than one processing device, the processing devices may be centrally located (e.g., directly coupled together via a wired and/or wireless bus structure) or may be distributedly located (e.g., cloud computing via indirect coupling via a local area network and/or a wide area network). Further note that if the processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit implements one or more of its functions via a state machine, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or logic circuitry, the memory and/or memory element storing the corresponding operational instructions may be embedded within, or external to, the circuitry comprising the state machine, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or logic circuitry. Still further note that, the memory element may store, and the processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit executes, hard coded and/or operational instructions corresponding to at least some of the steps and/or functions illustrated in one or more of the Figures. Such a memory device or memory element can be included in an article of manufacture.


One or more embodiments have been described above with the aid of method steps illustrating the performance of specified functions and relationships thereof. The boundaries and sequence of these functional building blocks and method steps have been arbitrarily defined herein for convenience of description. Alternate boundaries and sequences can be defined so long as the specified functions and relationships are appropriately performed. Any such alternate boundaries or sequences are thus within the scope and spirit of the claims. Further, the boundaries of these functional building blocks have been arbitrarily defined for convenience of description. Alternate boundaries could be defined as long as the certain significant functions are appropriately performed. Similarly, flow diagram blocks may also have been arbitrarily defined herein to illustrate certain significant functionality.


To the extent used, the flow diagram block boundaries and sequence could have been defined otherwise and still perform the certain significant functionality. Such alternate definitions of both functional building blocks and flow diagram blocks and sequences are thus within the scope and spirit of the claims. One of average skill in the art will also recognize that the functional building blocks, and other illustrative blocks, modules and components herein, can be implemented as illustrated or by discrete components, application specific integrated circuits, processors executing appropriate software and the like or any combination thereof.


In addition, a flow diagram may include a “start” and/or “continue” indication. The “start” and “continue” indications reflect that the steps presented can optionally be incorporated in or otherwise used in conjunction with other routines. In this context, “start” indicates the beginning of the first step presented and may be preceded by other activities not specifically shown. Further, the “continue” indication reflects that the steps presented may be performed multiple times and/or may be succeeded by other activities not specifically shown. Further, while a flow diagram indicates a particular ordering of steps, other orderings are likewise possible provided that the principles of causality are maintained.


The one or more embodiments are used herein to illustrate one or more aspects, one or more features, one or more concepts, and/or one or more examples. A physical embodiment of an apparatus, an article of manufacture, a machine, and/or of a process may include one or more of the aspects, features, concepts, examples, etc. described with reference to one or more of the embodiments discussed herein. Further, from figure to figure, the embodiments may incorporate the same or similarly named functions, steps, modules, etc. that may use the same or different reference numbers and, as such, the functions, steps, modules, etc. may be the same or similar functions, steps, modules, etc. or different ones.


Unless specifically stated to the contra, signals to, from, and/or between elements in a figure of any of the figures presented herein may be analog or digital, continuous time or discrete time, and single-ended or differential. For instance, if a signal path is shown as a single-ended path, it also represents a differential signal path. Similarly, if a signal path is shown as a differential path, it also represents a single-ended signal path. While one or more particular architectures are described herein, other architectures can likewise be implemented that use one or more data buses not expressly shown, direct connectivity between elements, and/or indirect coupling between other elements as recognized by one of average skill in the art.


The term “module” is used in the description of one or more of the embodiments. A module implements one or more functions via a device such as a processor or other processing device or other hardware that may include or operate in association with a memory that stores operational instructions. A module may operate independently and/or in conjunction with software and/or firmware. As also used herein, a module may contain one or more sub-modules, each of which may be one or more modules.


As may further be used herein, a computer readable memory includes one or more memory elements. A memory element may be a separate memory device, multiple memory devices, or a set of memory locations within a memory device. Such a memory device may be a read-only memory, random access memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, static memory, dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory, and/or any device that stores digital information. The memory device may be in a form a solid state memory, a hard drive memory, cloud memory, thumb drive, server memory, computing device memory, and/or other physical medium for storing digital information.


While particular combinations of various functions and features of the one or more embodiments have been expressly described herein, other combinations of these features and functions are likewise possible. The present disclosure is not limited by the particular examples disclosed herein and expressly incorporates these other combinations.

Claims
  • 1. A method for execution by one or more processing modules of one or more computing devices of a distributed storage network (DSN), the method comprises: maintaining distributed storage network (DSN) storage and maintenance loading information, wherein data is stored as sets of encoded data slices;estimating a future data access task rate;determining a probability level of potential future data loss based on the estimated future data access task rate;facilitating, upon the probability level of potential future data loss comparing unfavorably to a maximum probability of data loss threshold level, execution of a preventative data loss mitigation process, wherein the facilitating includes one or more of: storing additional encoded data slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices, prioritizing maintenance tasks, or de-prioritizing data access tasks; andsuspending, upon a current data accesstask rate being greater than a maximum task rate level, the execution of the preventative data loss mitigation process.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the storage and maintenance loading information include storage rates of data access and maintenance tasks versus time in a local memory.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the estimating includes generating the future data access task rate based on one or more of: the DSN loading information, interpreting a task queue, interpreting current loading rates, interpreting a schedule, or interpreting a message.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining includes at least one of: estimating a future capacity for execution of maintenance tasks based on the estimated future data access rate or estimating a data retrieval reliability level based on an estimated future capacity for execution of maintenance tasks.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the storing additional slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices includes increasing a write threshold number.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the data is stored as sets of encoded data slices and the suspending includes one or more of: storing fewer slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices, or prioritizing data access tasks.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the storing fewer slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices includes decreasing a read threshold number.
  • 8. A computing device of a group of computing devices of a distributed storage network (DSN), the computing device comprises: an interface;a local memory; anda processing module operably coupled to the interface and the local memory, wherein the processing module functions to: maintain distributed storage network (DSN) storage and maintenance loading information, wherein data is stored as sets of encoded data slices;estimate a future data access task rate;determine a probability level of potential future data loss based on the estimated future data access task rate; andfacilitate, upon the probability level of potential future data loss comparing unfavorably to a maximum probability of data loss threshold level, execution of a preventative data loss mitigation process, wherein the facilitation includes one or more of: storing additional slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices, prioritizing maintenance tasks, or de-prioritizing data access tasks; andsuspend, upon a current data access task rate being greater than a maximum task rate level, the execution of the preventative data loss mitigation process.
  • 9. The computing device of claim 8, wherein the storage and maintenance loading information include storage rates of data access and maintenance tasks versus time in a local memory.
  • 10. The computing device of claim 8, wherein the estimate a future data access task rate includes generating the future data access task rate based on one or more of: the DSN loading information, interpreting a task queue, interpreting current loading rates, interpreting a schedule, or interpreting a message.
  • 11. The computing device of claim 8, wherein the determine a probability level of potential future data loss based on the estimated future data access task rate includes at least one of: estimating a future capacity for execution of maintenance tasks based on the estimated future data access rate or estimating a data retrieval reliability level based on an estimated future capacity for execution of maintenance tasks.
  • 12. The computing device of claim 8, wherein the storing additional slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices includes increasing a write threshold number.
  • 13. The computing device of claim 8, wherein the data is stored as sets of encoded data slices and the suspend, upon a current data access task rate being greater than a maximum task rate level, the execution of the preventative data loss mitigation process includes one or more of: storing fewer slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices, or prioritizing data access tasks.
  • 14. The computing device of claim 13, wherein the storing fewer slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices includes decreasing a read threshold number.
  • 15. A system comprises: an interface;a local memory; anda processing module operably coupled to the interface and the local memory, wherein the processing module functions to: maintain distributed storage network (DSN) storage and maintenance loading information, wherein data is stored as sets of encoded data slices;estimate a future data access task rate;determine a probability level of potential future data loss based on the estimated future data access task rate; andfacilitate, when the probability level of potential future data loss compares unfavorably to a maximum probability of data loss threshold level, execution of a preventative data loss mitigation process, wherein the facilitating includes one or more of: storing additional encoded data slices of each set of newly stored encoded data slices, prioritizing maintenance tasks, or de-prioritizing data access tasks; andsuspend, when a current data access task rate is greater than a maximum task rate level, the execution of the preventative data loss mitigation process.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the storage and maintenance loading information include storage rates of data access and maintenance tasks versus time in a local memory.
  • 17. The system of claim 15, wherein the estimate a future data access task rate includes generating the future data access task rate based on one or more of: the DSN loading information, interpreting a task queue, interpreting current loading rates, interpreting a schedule, or interpreting a message.
  • 18. The system of claim 15, wherein the determine a probability level of potential future data loss based on the estimated future data access task rate includes at least one of: estimating a future capacity for execution of maintenance tasks based on the estimated future data access rate or estimating a data retrieval reliability level based on an estimated future capacity for execution of maintenance tasks.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present U.S. Utility Patent Application claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 120, as a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 15/844,779, entitled “STAND-BY DISTRIBUTED STORAGE UNITS,” filed Dec. 18, 2017, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 14/986,279, entitled “STORING DATA IN A DISPERSED STORAGE NETWORK,” filed Dec. 31, 2015, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/121,667, entitled “SELECTING A STORAGE POOL OF A DISPERSED STORAGE NETWORK,” filed Feb. 27, 2015, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility Patent Application for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (83)
Number Name Date Kind
4092732 Ouchi May 1978 A
5454101 Mackay et al. Sep 1995 A
5485474 Rabin Jan 1996 A
5774643 Lubbers et al. Jun 1998 A
5802364 Senator et al. Sep 1998 A
5809285 Hilland Sep 1998 A
5890156 Rekieta et al. Mar 1999 A
5987622 Lo Verso et al. Nov 1999 A
5991414 Garay et al. Nov 1999 A
6012159 Fischer et al. Jan 2000 A
6058454 Gerlach et al. May 2000 A
6128277 Bruck et al. Oct 2000 A
6175571 Haddock et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192472 Garay et al. Feb 2001 B1
6256688 Suetaka et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272658 Steele et al. Aug 2001 B1
6301604 Nojima Oct 2001 B1
6356949 Katsandres et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366995 Vilkov et al. Apr 2002 B1
6374336 Peters et al. Apr 2002 B1
6415373 Peters et al. Jul 2002 B1
6418539 Walker Jul 2002 B1
6449688 Peters et al. Sep 2002 B1
6567948 Steele et al. May 2003 B2
6571282 Bowman-Amuah May 2003 B1
6609223 Wolfgang Aug 2003 B1
6718361 Basani et al. Apr 2004 B1
6760808 Peters et al. Jul 2004 B2
6785768 Peters et al. Aug 2004 B2
6785783 Buckland Aug 2004 B2
6826711 Moulton et al. Nov 2004 B2
6879596 Dooply Apr 2005 B1
7003688 Pittelkow et al. Feb 2006 B1
7024451 Jorgenson Apr 2006 B2
7024609 Wolfgang et al. Apr 2006 B2
7080101 Watson et al. Jul 2006 B1
7103824 Halford Sep 2006 B2
7103915 Redlich et al. Sep 2006 B2
7111115 Peters et al. Sep 2006 B2
7140044 Redlich et al. Nov 2006 B2
7146644 Redlich et al. Dec 2006 B2
7171493 Shu et al. Jan 2007 B2
7222133 Raipurkar et al. May 2007 B1
7240236 Cutts et al. Jul 2007 B2
7272613 Sim et al. Sep 2007 B2
7636724 de la Torre et al. Dec 2009 B2
10402268 Grube Sep 2019 B2
20020062422 Butterworth et al. May 2002 A1
20020166079 Ulrich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030018927 Gadir et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030037261 Meffert et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065617 Watkins et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030084020 Shu May 2003 A1
20040024963 Talagala et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040122917 Menon et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040215998 Buxton et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040228493 Ma et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050100022 Ramprashad May 2005 A1
20050114594 Corbett et al. May 2005 A1
20050125593 Karpoff et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131993 Fatula, Jr. Jun 2005 A1
20050132070 Redlich et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144382 Schmisseur Jun 2005 A1
20050229069 Hassner Oct 2005 A1
20060047907 Shiga et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060136448 Cialini et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060156059 Kitamura Jul 2006 A1
20060224603 Correll, Jr. Oct 2006 A1
20070079081 Gladwin et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070079082 Gladwin et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070079083 Gladwin et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088970 Buxton et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070174192 Gladwin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070214285 Au et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070234110 Soran et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070283167 Venters, III et al. Dec 2007 A1
20090094251 Gladwin et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094318 Gladwin et al. Apr 2009 A1
20100023524 Gladwin et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100332751 Quigley Dec 2010 A1
20140156716 Baptist Jun 2014 A1
20140250300 Runkis Sep 2014 A1
20190036648 Yanovsky Jan 2019 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (18)
Entry
Shamir; How to Share a Secret; Communications of the ACM; vol. 22, No. 11; Nov. 1979; pp. 612-613.
Rabin; Efficient Dispersal of Information for Security, Load Balancing, and Fault Tolerance; Journal of the Association for Computer Machinery; vol. 36, No. 2; Apr. 1989; pp. 335-348.
Chung; An Automatic Data Segmentation Method for 3D Measured Data Points; National Taiwan University; pp. 1-8; 1998.
Plank, T1: Erasure Codes for Storage Applications; FAST2005, 4th Usenix Conference on File Storage Technologies; Dec. 13-16, 2005; pp. 1-74.
Wildi; Java iSCSi Initiator; Master Thesis; Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz; Feb. 2007; 60 pgs.
Legg; Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Syntaxes and Matching Rules; IETF Network Working Group; RFC 4517; Jun. 2006; pp. 1-50.
Zeilenga; Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Internationalized String Preparation; IETF Network Working Group; RFC 4518; Jun. 2006; pp. 1-14.
Smith; Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Uniform Resource Locator; IETF Network Working Group; RFC 4516; Jun. 2006; pp. 1-15.
Smith; Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Search Filters; IETF Network Working Group; RFC 4515; Jun. 2006; pp. 1-12.
Zeilenga; Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Directory Information Models; IETF Network Working Group; RFC 4512; Jun. 2006; pp. 1-49.
Sciberras; Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Schema for User Applications; IETF Network Working Group; RFC 4519; Jun. 2006; pp. 1-33.
Harrison; Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms; IETF Network Working Group; RFC 4513; Jun. 2006; pp. 1-32.
Zeilenga; Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map; IETF Network Working Group; RFC 4510; Jun. 2006; pp. 1-8.
Zeilenga; Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Distinguished Names; IETF Network Working Group; RFC 4514; Jun. 2006; pp. 1-15.
Sermersheim; Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol; IETF Network Working Group; RFC 4511; Jun. 2006; pp. 1-68.
Satran, et al.; Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI); IETF Network Working Group; RFC 3720; Apr. 2004; pp. 1-257.
Xin, et al.; Evaluation of Distributed Recovery in Large-Scale Storage Systems; 13th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing; Jun. 2004; pp. 172-181.
Kubiatowicz, et al.; OceanStore: An Architecture for Global-Scale Persistent Storage; Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS 2000); Nov. 2000; pp. 1-12.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180121278 A1 May 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62121667 Feb 2015 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15844779 Dec 2017 US
Child 15846300 US
Parent 14986279 Dec 2015 US
Child 15844779 US