Probe isolation seal pad

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7121338
  • Patent Number
    7,121,338
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 27, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 17, 2006
    17 years ago
Abstract
A seal pad comprising a base plate and an expandable material engaged with the base plate. The expandable material comprises an outer surface where a portion of the outer surface is used to form a seal against a borehole wall. A portion of the outer surface of the expandable material is expanded during the sealing against the borehole wall. The seal pad also comprises a retainer for controlling the expansion of the expandable material. The retainer controls the expansion of the expandable material by engaging at least a portion of the outer surface of the expandable material. Thus when the seal is formed by expanding the expandable material, at least a portion of the expandable material is contained by the retainer.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Not Applicable.


STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.


BACKGROUND

During the drilling and completion of oil and gas wells, it is often necessary to engage in ancillary operations, such as monitoring the operability of equipment used during the drilling process or evaluating the production capabilities of formations intersected by the wellbore. For example, after a well or well interval has been drilled, zones of interest are often tested to determine various formation properties such as permeability, fluid type, fluid quality, formation pressure, and formation pressure gradient. Formation fluid samples are also taken for analysis of their hydrocarbon content. These tests determine whether commercial exploitation of the intersected formations is viable.


Formation testing tools are used to acquire a sample of fluid from a subterranean formation. This sample of fluid can then be analyzed to determine important information regarding the formation and the formation fluid contained within, such as pressure, permeability, and composition. The acquisition of accurate data from the wellbore is critical to the optimization of hydrocarbon wells. This wellbore data can be used to determine the location and quality of hydrocarbon reserves, whether the reserves can be produced through the wellbore, and for well control during drilling operations.


Formation testing tools may be used in conjunction with wireline logging operations or as a component of a logging-while-drilling (LWD) or measurement-while-drilling (MWD) package. In wireline logging operations, the drill string is removed from the wellbore and measurement tools are lowered into the wellbore using a heavy cable (wireline) that includes wires for providing power and control from the surface. In LWD and MWD operations, the measurement tools are integrated into the drill string and are ordinarily powered by batteries and controlled by either on-board or remote control systems.


To understand the mechanics of formation testing, it is important to first understand how hydrocarbons are stored in subterranean formations. Hydrocarbons are not typically located in large underground pools, but are instead found within very small holes, or pores, within certain types of rock. The ability of a formation to allow hydrocarbons to move between the pores, and consequently into a wellbore, is known as permeability. Similarly, the hydrocarbons contained within these formations are usually under pressure and it is important to determine the magnitude of that pressure in order to safely and efficiently produce the well.


During drilling operations, a wellbore is typically filled with a drilling fluid (“mud”), such as water, or a water-based or oil-based mud. The density of the drilling fluid can be increased by adding special solids that are suspended in the mud. Increasing the density of the drilling fluid increases the hydrostatic pressure that helps maintain the integrity of the wellbore and prevents unwanted formation fluids from entering the wellbore. The drilling fluid is continuously circulated during drilling operations. Over time, as some of the liquid portion of the mud flows into the formation, solids in the mud are deposited on the inner wall of the wellbore to form a mudcake.


The mudcake acts as a membrane between the wellbore, which is filled with drilling fluid, and the hydrocarbon formation. The mudcake also limits the migration of drilling fluids from the area of high hydrostatic pressure in the wellbore to the relatively low-pressure formation. Mudcakes typically range from about 0.25 to 0.5 inch thick, and polymeric mudcakes are often about 0.1 inch thick. The thickness of a mudcake is generally dependent on the time the borehole is exposed to drilling fluid. Thus, in MWD and LWD applications, where a section of the borehole may be very recently drilled, the mudcake may be thinner than in wireline applications.


Formation testing tools generally comprise an elongated tubular body divided into several tubular modules serving predetermined functions. A typical tool may have a hydraulic power module that converts electrical into hydraulic power; a telemetry module that provides electrical and data communication between the modules and an uphole control unit; one or more probe modules collecting samples of the formation fluids; a flow control module regulating the flow of formation and other fluids in and out of the tool; and a sample collection module that may contain various size chambers for storage of the collected fluid samples. The various modules of a tool can be arranged differently depending on the specific testing application, and may further include special testing modules, such as NMR measurement equipment. In certain applications the tool may be attached to a drill bit for logging-while-drilling (LWD) or measurement-while drilling (MWD) purposes. Examples of such multifunctional modular formation testing tools are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,934,374; 5,826,662; 5,741,962; 4,936,139, and 4,860,581, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.


In formation testing equipment suitable for integration with a drill string during drilling operations, various devices or systems are provided for isolating a formation from the remainder of the wellbore, drawing fluid from the formation, and measuring physical properties of the fluid and the formation. However, MWD formation testing equipment is subject to harsh conditions in the wellbore during the drilling process that can damage and degrade the formation testing equipment before and during the testing process. These harsh conditions include vibration and torque from the drill bit, exposure to drilling mud, drilled cuttings, and formation fluids, hydraulic forces of the circulating drilling mud, and scraping of the formation testing equipment against the sides of the wellbore. Sensitive electronics and sensors must be robust enough to withstand the pressures and temperatures, and especially the extreme vibration and shock conditions of the drilling environment, yet maintain accuracy, repeatability, and reliability.


In one aspect of formation testing, the formation testing apparatus may include a probe assembly for engaging the borehole wall and acquiring formation fluid samples. The probe assembly may include an isolation pad to engage the borehole wall, or any mudcake accumulated thereon. The isolation pad seals against the mudcake and around a hollow probe, which places an internal cavity in fluid communication with the formation. This creates a fluid pathway that allows formation fluid to flow between the formation and the formation tester while isolated from the wellbore fluid.


In order to acquire a useful sample, the probe must stay isolated from the relative high pressure of the wellbore fluid. Therefore, the integrity of the seal that is formed by the isolation pad is critical to the performance of the tool. If the wellbore fluid is allowed to leak into the collected formation fluids, a non-representative sample will be obtained and the test will have to be repeated.


Examples of isolation pads and probes used in wireline formation testers include Halliburton's DT, SFTT, SFT4, and RDT. Isolation pads that are used with wireline formation testers are generally simple rubber pads affixed to the end of the extending sample probe. The rubber is normally affixed to a metallic plate that provides support to the rubber as well as a connection to the probe. These rubber pads are often molded to fit with the specific diameter hole in which they will be operating. These types of isolator pads are commonly molded to have a contacting surface that is cylindrical or spherical.


While conventional rubber pads are reasonably effective in some wireline operations, when a formation tester is used in a MWD or LWD application, they have not performed as desired. Failure of conventional rubber pads has also been a concern in wireline applications that may require the performance of a large number of formation pressure tests during a single run into the wellbore, especially in wells having particularly harsh operating conditions. In a MWD or LWD environment, the formation tester is integrated into the drill string and is thus subjected to the harsh downhole environment for a much longer period than in a wireline testing application. In addition, during drilling, the formation tester may be constantly rotated with the drill string and may contact the side of the wellbore and damage any exposed isolator pads. The pads may also be damaged during drilling by the drill cuttings that are being circulated through the wellbore by the drilling fluid.


The structure and operation of a generic formation tester are best explained by referring to FIG. 1. In a typical formation testing operation, a formation tester 100 is lowered to a desired depth within a wellbore 102. The wellbore 102 is filled with mud 104, and the wall of wellbore 102 is coated with a mudcake 106. Once formation tester 100 is at the desired depth, it is set in place by extending a pair of feet 108 and an isolation pad 110 to engage the mudcake 106. Isolation pad 110 seals against mudcake 106 and around hollow probe 112, which places internal cavity 119 in fluid communication with formation 122. This creates a fluid pathway that allows formation fluid to flow between formation 122 and formation tester 100 while isolated from wellbore fluid 104.


In order to acquire a useful sample, probe 112 must stay isolated from the relative high pressure of wellbore fluid 104. Therefore, the integrity of the seal that is formed by isolation pad 110 is critical to the performance of the tool. If wellbore fluid 104 is allowed to leak into the collected formation fluids, an non-representative sample will be obtained and the test will have to be repeated.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more detailed description of the embodiments, reference will now be made to the following accompanying drawings:



FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a prior art formation testing tool;



FIG. 2 is a schematic elevation view, partly in cross-section, of an embodiment of a formation tester apparatus disposed in a subterranean well;



FIG. 3 is an embodiment of the extendable test probe assembly of the formation tester in a retracted position;



FIG. 4 is an elevation view of the formation tester with the extendable test probe assembly in an extended position;



FIG. 4A is a detailed view of the extendable test probe assembly of FIG. 4;



FIG. 5 is a top view of the seal pad of the extendable test probe assembly of FIG. 4;



FIG. 5A is a cross-section view of plane B—B of the seal pad shown in FIG. 5;



FIG. 5B is a cross-section view of plane A—A of the seal pad shown in FIG. 5;



FIG. 5C is a cross-section view of plane C—C of the seal pad shown in FIG. 5;



FIG. 5D is a detailed view of the section “D” of FIG. 5B;



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of the seal pad shown in FIG. 5;



FIG. 7 is a top view of another embodiment of the seal pad of the extendable test probe assembly of the formation tester;



FIG. 7A is a side elevation view of the seal pad shown in FIG. 7;



FIG. 7B is a cross-section view of plane B—B of the seal pad shown in FIG. 7;



FIG. 7C is a cross-section view of plane A—A of the seal pad shown in FIG. 7A;



FIG. 8 is a top view of an alternative seal pad of the extendable probe assembly of FIG. 4; and



FIG. 8B is a cross-section view of the plane A—A of the seal pad shown in FIG. 8.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

The drawings and the description below disclose specific embodiments of the present invention with the understanding that the embodiments are to be considered an exemplification of the principles of the invention, and are not intended to limit the invention to that illustrated and described. Further, it is to be fully recognized that the different teachings of the embodiments discussed below may be employed separately or in any suitable combination to produce desired results.


Various embodiments described provide for isolator pad assemblies especially suited for use in MWD or LWD applications but these assemblies may also be used in wireline logging or other applications. Reference is made to using the embodiments with a formation testing tool, but the embodiments may also find use in any tool that seeks to acquire a sample of formation fluid that is substantially free of wellbore fluid. It is to be fully recognized that the different teachings of the embodiments discussed below may be employed separately or in any suitable combination to produce desired results.


Referring to FIG. 2, a formation tester tool 10 is shown as a part of bottom hole assembly 6 (BHA) that includes an MWD sub 13 and a drill bit 7 at its lower-most end. The BHA 6 is lowered from a drilling platform 2, such as a ship or other conventional platform, via a drill string 5. The drill string 5 is disposed through a riser 3 and a well head 4. Conventional drilling equipment (not shown) is supported within the derrick 1 and rotates the drill string 5 and the drill bit 7, causing the bit 7 to form a borehole 8 through the formation material 9. The borehole 8 penetrates subterranean zones or reservoirs, such as reservoir 11, that are believed to contain hydrocarbons in a commercially viable quantity. It should be understood that the formation tester 10 may be employed in other bottom hole assemblies and with other drilling apparatus in land-based drilling, as well as offshore drilling as shown in FIG. 2. In all instances, in addition to the formation tester 10, the bottom hole assembly 6 contains various conventional apparatus and systems, such as a down hole drill motor, mud pulse telemetry system, measurement-while-drilling sensors and systems, and others well known in the art. The drilling equipment used may be any suitable type, including a non-rotating composite tubing using a “mud motor” to power the drill bit rather than rotating drill string. The formation tester tool 10 may also be used on a wireline tool instead of a drill string.


Referring now to FIG. 3, a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of an extendable test probe assembly 14 is shown in a retracted position and housed a tool body 12 of the formation tester 10. The extendable test probe assembly 14 generally comprises a seal pad 16 and an inner cylinder 17. The inner cylinder 17 is also known as a “snorkel” and includes a filter (not shown). The extendable test probe assembly 14 and tool body 12 are shown disposed in a wellbore 20 drilled into a formation 22. The wall of wellbore 20 is coated with a mudcake 24 that is formed by the circulation of wellbore fluid 26 through the wellbore 20.


Referring now to FIGS. 3, 4, and 4A, the tool body 12 has a substantially cylindrical body that is typical of tools used in downhole environments. The body 12 includes a hydraulic conduit 28 and a sample conduit 30 therethrough. The sample conduit 30 is in fluid communication with a fluid sample collection chamber 31. Likewise, the hydraulic conduit 28 is in fluid communication with a hydraulic power supply (not shown) that supplies hydraulic fluid to the conduit 28.


The extendable test probe assembly 14 is disposed within a corresponding recess 11 in the body 12. The outer surface of the cylinder 17 is in sealing engagement with the inner surface of the cavity in the tool body 12. Thus, the extendable test probe assembly 14 is sealed to and slidable relative to the tool body 12. The extendable test probe assembly 14 also comprises an axial central bore 32 through the cylinder 17. The central bore 32 is in fluid communication with the sample conduit 30.


As shown in FIGS. 4, 4A, 55D, and 6, the seal pad 16 is generally disc-shaped. If desired, the recess 11 in the tool body 12 is sized and configured to receive the pad 16 so that no portion of the extendable test probe assembly 14 extends beyond the outer surface of the tool body 12 when in the retracted position. The seal pad 16 also comprises a base plate 18 and an expandable material 40 engaged with the base plate 18. The expandable material 40 comprises an outer surface 42, a portion of which is engaged with the base plate 18 and a portion of which is used to form a seal against the wall of the borehole 20. The seal pad 16 also comprises a retainer 44 around the expandable material 40. The expandable material 40 and the base plate 18 also comprise a common bore 19 for housing the cylinder 17. The expandable material may be any material such as an elastomeric material, rubber, Teflon, or any other material suitable for forming a seal against a borehole wall. The expandable material 40 may also be engaged with the base plate 18 by epoxy or any other suitable means.


The drilling equipment drills the wellbore 20 until the desired formation 22 to be tested is reached. Drilling operations are then ceased to test the formation 22. The formation tester 10 operates by first extending the extendable test probe assembly 14 by applying fluid pressure through the hydraulic conduit 28 so that hydraulic pressure is applied between the extendable test probe assembly 14 and the body 12. The pressure advances the seal pad 16 toward the wall of the wellbore 20. The seal pad 16 is advanced through the mudcake 24 until the expandable material 40 contacts the formation 22. As the seal pad 16 extends, the expandable material 40 compresses against the formation 22, forming a seal.


As the expandable material compresses against the formation 22, at least a portion of the expandable material 40 expands. The expansion occurs generally in the lateral direction relative to the direction of extension of the extendable test probe assembly 14, but may also occur in other directions. As the expandable material 40 expands, the retainer 44 controls the expansion of the expandable material 40 around the perimeter of the expandable material 40. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 5–5D, the retainer 44 retains the expandable material with a surface 46 around a portion of the perimeter of the expandable material 40, as best shown in cross-section view B—B of FIG. 5A. The retainer 44 also retains the expandable material 40 with an expansion cavity 48, as best shown in cross-section views A—A of FIG. 5B and detail view “D” of FIG. 5D. Alternatively, as best illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 8B, the retainer 44 retains the expandable material with a surface 46 around the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion of the expandable material when sealed against the borehole wall. As illustrated in FIG. 8B, the retainer also retains the expandable material 40 with an expansion cavity 48. As the expandable material 40 expands when forming the seal with the wall of the borehole 20, the expandable material engages the surface 46 and also fills in the cavity 48 as shown in FIGS. 4 and 4A. Thus, the retainer 44 controls the expansion of the expandable material 40 by engaging at least a portion of the outer surface of the expandable material when sealed against the borehole wall. The retainer 44 shown in FIGS. 3–6 controls the expansion of the expandable material generally in the lateral direction to the direction of extension of the extendable test probe assembly 14. However, the retainer 44 may also be used to control expansion of the extendable material 44 in other directions as well.


As shown in FIGS. 5–5D, the retainer surface 46 and the expansion cavity 48 do not both surround the perimeter of the expandable material. However, any suitable configuration of either the retainer surface 46 or the expansion cavity 48 used together or individually may be used. For example, as illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 8B, the retainer 44 may retain the expandable material with a surface 46 around the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion of the expandable material when sealed against the borehole wall. Additionally, as shown in FIGS. 3, 4, 4A, and 55D, the retainer 44 is separate from the base plate 18. However, the retainer 44 may also be integral with the base pate 18 and thus not be a separate piece. The retainer 44 also need not surround the entire perimeter of the expandable material 40, but need only surround a portion of the expandable material 40 to control as much expansion as desired.


Once the extendable test probe assembly 14 is in its extended position and a seal formed against the wall of the borehole 20, a sample of formation fluid can be acquired by drawing in formation fluid through the bore 19 of the expandable material and base plate and into the axial central bore 32 of the cylinder 17. As shown in FIGS. 4 and 4A, the fluid is drawn in the cylinder 17, through the fluid sample conduit 30, and into the fluid sample chamber 31. The sample fluid may be drawn in using a fluid pump 50. The fluid may also be drawn by having the fluid sample chamber 31 volume varied by actuating one or more draw-down pistons (not shown), such as are known in the art. In this manner, the pressure in sample conduit 30 can be selectively controlled. The fluid sample may also be drawn into the chamber 31 by any other suitable means. Once a suitable sample has been collected, the extendable test probe assembly 14 can be returned to the retracted position by reducing the pressure within hydraulic conduit 28. The extendable test probe assembly 14 may be retractable by applying positive fluid pressure but may also be retracted using only hydrostatic pressure from the wellbore 20. After the extendable test probe assembly 14 is retracted, drilling operations may again commence. The formation tester 10 may also comprise a sensor (not shown) for sensing at least one characteristic of the formation fluid. The fluid characteristic may include the fluid type or quality, the formation pressure, the hydrocarbon content, or any other desired characteristic. Once the sensor measures the characteristic, the sensor may also transmit a signal indicative of the characteristic or characteristics to the surface through a telemetry system (not shown). The telemetry system may comprise electrical signal conduits in the drill string or wireline, a mud-pulse telemetry system, or any other suitable telemetry system for transmitting a signal to the surface.


Referring now to FIGS. 7–7C, a second embodiment of the seal pad 216 is shown. The operation of the seal pad 216 is similar to the seal pad embodiment 16 described above and some details will not be repeated. The seal pad 216 comprises a base plate 218 and an expandable material 240 engaged with the base plate 218. The expandable material 240 comprises an outer surface 242, a portion of which is engaged with the base plate 218 and a portion of which is used to form a seal against the wall of the borehole (not shown). The seal pad base pate 218 also comprises a retainer 244 comprising raised ribs 246 on the outer perimeter of the expandable material 240. As the expandable material 240 is pressed against the wall of the wellbore, a portion of the expandable material 240 expands. The raised ribs 246 control the expansion of the expandable material 240 by engaging a portion of the expandable material 240 as the expandable material 240 forms a seal with the wall of the wellbore.



FIGS. 7–7C show two ribs 246 on opposite sides of the base plate 218. There may also be only one rib 246 along one side of the base plate 218. There may also be ribs 246 along all of the sides of the base plate 218. The ribs 246 may also be any desired height for controlling the expansion of the expandable material 240.


While specific embodiments have been shown and described, modifications can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or teaching of this invention. The embodiments as described are exemplary only and are not limiting. Many variations and modifications are possible and are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited to the embodiments described, but is only limited by the claims that follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A seal pad for sealing against a borehole wall comprising: a base plate;an expandable material engaged with the base plate; anda retainer configured to retain at least a portion of the expandable material that is expanded when sealed against the borehole wall in a lateral plane of expansion of the expandable material.
  • 2. The seal pad of claim 1 where the retainer is configured to laterally retain the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion of the expandable material when sealed against the borehole wall.
  • 3. The seal pad of claim 1 where the retainer further comprises an expansion cavity, at least a portion of the expandable material being expanded into the cavity when sealed against the borehole wall.
  • 4. The seal pad of claim 3 where the expansion cavity is located around the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion of the expandable material when sealed against the borehole wall.
  • 5. The seal pad of claim 1 where the retainer is integrated with the base plate.
  • 6. The seal pad of claim 5 where the retainer comprises a rib on at least a portion of the base plate.
  • 7. The seal pad of claim 1 where the retainer comprises a surface around the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion of the expandable material when sealed against the borehole wall.
  • 8. The seal pad of claim 1 where the expandable material comprises an elastomeric material.
  • 9. The seal pad of claim 1 where the expandable material comprises rubber.
  • 10. The seal pad of claim 1 where the expandable material comprises Teflon.
  • 11. A method of forming a seal against a borehole wall comprising: sealingly engaging the borehole wall with at least a portion of an expandable material engaged with a base plate, at least a portion of the expandable material expanding during engagement of the borehole wall; andretaining the expansion of at least a portion of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion with a retainer.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 further comprising retaining the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion with the retainer.
  • 13. The method of claim 11 further comprising expanding at least a portion of the expandable material into a retainer expansion cavity when engaging the borehole wall.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 further comprising expanding the expandable material into the expansion cavity around the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion.
  • 15. A formation tester for engaging the wall of a borehole comprising: a body;an extendable test probe assembly comprising: a seal pad comprising: a base plate;an expandable material engaged with the base platea retainer configured to retain at least a portion of the expandable material that is expanded when sealed against the borehole wall in a lateral plane of expansion of the expandable material; anda bore through the base plate and seal pad; anda cylinder comprising a flow path in fluid communication with the formation through the seal pad bore;a fluid sample collection reservoir in fluid communication with the test probe cylinder flow path; anda fluid transfer device configured to transfer formation fluid through the test probe cylinder flow path and into the fluid sample collection chamber.
  • 16. The formation tester of claim 15 where the retainer is configured to laterally retain the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion of the expandable material when sealed against the borehole wall.
  • 17. The formation tester of claim 15 where the seal pad retainer further comprises an expansion cavity, at least a portion of the expandable material being expanded into the cavity when sealed against the borehole wall.
  • 18. The formation tester of claim 17 where the seal pad expansion cavity is located around the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion of the expandable material when sealed against the borehole wall.
  • 19. The formation tester of claim 15 where the seal pad retainer is integrated with the base plate.
  • 20. The formation tester of claim 19 where the seal pad retainer comprises a rib on at least a portion of the base plate.
  • 21. The formation tester of claim 15 where the seal pad retainer comprises a surface around the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion of the expandable material when sealed against the borehole wall.
  • 22. The formation tester of claim 15 where the seal pad expandable material comprises an elastomeric material.
  • 23. The formation tester of claim 15 where the seal pad expandable material comprises rubber.
  • 24. The formation tester of claim 15 where the seal pad expandable material comprises Teflon.
  • 25. The formation tester of claim 15 further comprising a sensor for sensing a characteristic of the formation fluid sample.
  • 26. The formation tester of claim 15 where the body is configured for being lowered into a borehole on a wireline.
  • 27. The formation tester of claim 15 where the body is configured for being lowered into a borehole on a drill string.
  • 28. The formation tester of claim 15 where the fluid transfer device comprises a fluid pump.
  • 29. A method for collecting a formation fluid sample from the wall of a borehole comprising: inserting a formation tester into the borehole, the formation tester comprising a body;extending an extendable test probe assembly from the body into sealing contact with the borehole wall, the test probe assembly forming the seal with at least a portion of an expandable material engaged with a base plate, at least a portion of the expandable material expanding during engagement of the borehole wall;retaining the expansion of at least a portion of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion with a retainer;collecting a formation fluid sample through a test probe assembly cylinder in fluid contact with the formation through a bore in the seal pad, the test probe assembly cylinder comprising a flow path;transferring the formation fluid sample with a fluid transfer device from the test probe assembly cylinder to a fluid sample collection chamber.
  • 30. The method of claim 29 further comprising retaining the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion with the retainer.
  • 31. The method of claim 29 further comprising expanding at least a portion of the expandable material into a retainer expansion cavity when engaging the borehole wall.
  • 32. The method of claim 31 further comprising expanding the expandable material into the expansion cavity around the entire perimeter of the expandable material in a lateral plane of expansion.
  • 33. The method of claim 29 further comprising analyzing the formation sample for a characteristic of the formation fluid with a sensor.
  • 34. The method of claim 29 further comprising inserting the formation tester into the borehole on a drill string while drilling the borehole.
  • 35. The method of claim 34 further comprising ceasing the drilling while collecting the formation fluid sample, withdrawing the extendable test probe assembly into the formation tester body, and continuing to drill the borehole.
  • 36. The method of claim 29 further comprising inserting the formation tester into the borehole on a wireline tool.
  • 37. The method of claim 29 further comprising transmitting a signal indicating the sensed formation fluid characteristic through a telemetry system to the surface.
  • 38. The method of claim 11 where the expandable material comprises an elastomeric material.
  • 39. The method of claim 11 where the expandable material comprises rubber.
  • 40. The method of claim 11 where the expandable material comprises Teflon.
  • 41. The method of claim 29 where the expandable material comprises an elastomeric material.
  • 42. The method of claim 29 where the expandable material comprises rubber.
  • 43. The method of claim 29 where the expandable material comprises Teflon.
US Referenced Citations (125)
Number Name Date Kind
3173485 Bretzke, Jr. Mar 1965 A
3324712 Watson et al. Jun 1967 A
3530933 Whitten Sep 1970 A
3565119 Pierpont, Jr. et al. Feb 1971 A
3565169 Bell Feb 1971 A
3599719 Brown Aug 1971 A
3658127 Cochran et al. Apr 1972 A
3659647 Brown May 1972 A
3673864 Cubberly, Jr. Jul 1972 A
3776561 Haney Dec 1973 A
3811321 Urbanosky May 1974 A
3813936 Urbanosky et al. Jun 1974 A
3858445 Urbanosky Jan 1975 A
3859850 Whitten et al. Jan 1975 A
3859851 Urbanosky Jan 1975 A
3864970 Bell Feb 1975 A
3868826 Landers Mar 1975 A
3924463 Urbanosky Dec 1975 A
3934468 Brieger Jan 1976 A
3952588 Whitten Apr 1976 A
4003581 Hutchison Jan 1977 A
4046011 Olsen Sep 1977 A
4053354 Kitsnik Oct 1977 A
4146092 Upton Mar 1979 A
4161319 Stocking Jul 1979 A
4210018 Brieger Jul 1980 A
4224987 Allen Sep 1980 A
4234197 Amancharla Nov 1980 A
4246782 Hallmark Jan 1981 A
4248081 Hallmark Feb 1981 A
4252195 Fredd Feb 1981 A
4270385 Hallmark Jun 1981 A
4287946 Brieger Sep 1981 A
4288082 Setterberg, Jr. Sep 1981 A
4289200 Fisher, Jr. Sep 1981 A
4292842 Hallmark Oct 1981 A
4302018 Harvey et al. Nov 1981 A
4323256 Miyagishima et al. Apr 1982 A
4339948 Hallmark Jul 1982 A
4416152 Wilson Nov 1983 A
4434653 Montgomery Mar 1984 A
4441721 Harris et al. Apr 1984 A
4444400 Norman Apr 1984 A
4452463 Buckner Jun 1984 A
4482086 Wagner et al. Nov 1984 A
4500095 Schisler et al. Feb 1985 A
4507957 Montgomery et al. Apr 1985 A
4512399 Gano et al. Apr 1985 A
4513612 Shalek Apr 1985 A
4535843 Jageler Aug 1985 A
4579314 Schaeper et al. Apr 1986 A
4589485 Wray May 1986 A
4593560 Purfurst Jun 1986 A
4610158 Lawton, Jr. Sep 1986 A
4635717 Jageler Jan 1987 A
4638860 Magee, Jr. et al. Jan 1987 A
4745802 Purfurst May 1988 A
4753444 Jackson et al. Jun 1988 A
4765404 Bailey et al. Aug 1988 A
4843878 Purfurst et al. Jul 1989 A
4845982 Gilbert Jul 1989 A
4860580 DuRocher Aug 1989 A
4860581 Zimmerman et al. Aug 1989 A
4862967 Harris Sep 1989 A
4879900 Gilbert Nov 1989 A
4884439 Baird Dec 1989 A
4890487 Dussan et al. Jan 1990 A
4936139 Zimmerman et al. Jun 1990 A
4941350 Schneider Jul 1990 A
4951749 Carroll Aug 1990 A
5056595 Desbrandes Oct 1991 A
5095745 Desbrandes Mar 1992 A
5101907 Schultz et al. Apr 1992 A
5148705 Desbrandes Sep 1992 A
5184508 Desbrandes Feb 1993 A
5230244 Gilbert Jul 1993 A
5231874 Gilbert Aug 1993 A
5233866 Desbrandes Aug 1993 A
5238070 Schultz et al. Aug 1993 A
5249461 Ponder et al. Oct 1993 A
5265015 Auzerais et al. Nov 1993 A
5269180 Dave et al. Dec 1993 A
5279153 Dussan et al. Jan 1994 A
5303775 Michaels et al. Apr 1994 A
5311938 Hendrickson et al. May 1994 A
5318117 Echols, III et al. Jun 1994 A
5329811 Schultz et al. Jul 1994 A
5335542 Ramakrishnan et al. Aug 1994 A
5377755 Michaels et al. Jan 1995 A
5390738 Eslinger et al. Feb 1995 A
5433269 Hendrickson Jul 1995 A
5473939 Leder et al. Dec 1995 A
5489740 Fletcher Feb 1996 A
5549159 Shwe et al. Aug 1996 A
5587525 Shwe et al. Dec 1996 A
5602334 Proett et al. Feb 1997 A
5622223 Vasquez Apr 1997 A
5635631 Yesudas et al. Jun 1997 A
5644076 Proett et al. Jul 1997 A
5676213 Auzerais et al. Oct 1997 A
5741962 Birchak et al. Apr 1998 A
5743333 Willauer et al. Apr 1998 A
5803186 Berger et al. Sep 1998 A
5826662 Beck et al. Oct 1998 A
5857520 Mullen et al. Jan 1999 A
5934374 Hrametz et al. Aug 1999 A
5961123 Ingram et al. Oct 1999 A
5992522 Boyd et al. Nov 1999 A
6007067 Hiorth Dec 1999 A
6047239 Berger et al. Apr 2000 A
6203020 Mireles, Jr. et al. Mar 2001 B1
6230798 Appleton May 2001 B1
6250638 Youngquist Jun 2001 B1
6301959 Hrametz et al. Oct 2001 B1
6557640 Cook et al. May 2003 B1
6568487 Meister et al. May 2003 B1
6658930 Abbas Dec 2003 B1
20010035289 Runia Nov 2001 A1
20020189339 Montalvo et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030068599 Balfour et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030098162 Cook May 2003 A1
20040079909 Foster Apr 2004 A1
20040173351 Fox et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050109538 Fisseler et al. May 2005 A1
20050155760 Hill et al. Jul 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (43)
Number Date Country
1108985 Sep 1981 CA
1167761 May 1984 CA
1182393 Feb 1985 CA
1212315 Oct 1986 CA
1280362 Feb 1991 CA
2096068 May 1993 CA
2185169 Nov 1993 CA
2185170 Nov 1993 CA
2103096 May 1994 CA
2204329 Nov 1997 CA
2215422 Feb 1999 CA
2318157 Jul 1999 CA
2389123 Dec 2002 CA
1356452 Jul 2002 CN
0 102 756 Dec 1986 EP
0 250 107 Aug 1992 EP
0 497 588 Aug 1992 EP
0 599 422 Jun 1994 EP
0 453 052 Mar 1995 EP
0 453 051 Apr 1995 EP
2 789 469 Feb 2000 FR
1455955 Nov 1976 GB
2 204 922 Nov 1988 GB
2 226 908 Jul 1990 GB
2 283 516 May 1995 GB
2 312 908 Nov 1997 GB
2 328 229 Feb 1999 GB
2 333 310 Jul 1999 GB
2 350 635 Dec 2000 GB
2 378 719 Feb 2003 GB
2 097 555 Nov 1997 RU
2 120 023 Oct 1998 RU
2 128 278 Mar 1999 RU
2 201 495 Mar 2003 RU
306745 Dec 1972 SU
1735575 May 1992 SU
1745894 Jul 1992 SU
1763646 Sep 1992 SU
WO 8102457 Sep 1981 WO
WO 9728348 Aug 1997 WO
WO 9936663 Jul 1999 WO
WO 0043812 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0198630 Dec 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050161218 A1 Jul 2005 US