1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a process and device for the treatment of a fiber stock suspension, intended specifically for paper and/or cardboard production, and, more particularly, to a process of adding at least one additive thereto.
2. Description of the Related Art
The gentle handling of raw material resources necessitated specifically by economic and ecological reasons manifests itself in paper production in increasingly low basis weights of the paper web, as well as in partial replacement of the fiber stock by fillers. In order to achieve the strongest possible adhesion of the fillers onto the fiber surfaces, the latest appropriate treatment is a so-called “Fiber Loading™” process, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,223,090, which is hereby incorporated by reference. During such a “Fiber Loading™” process, at least one additive, specifically a filler, is added to the moistened fiber surfaces of the fiber material. The fibers may, for instance, be loaded with calcium carbonate. For this purpose calcium oxide and/or calcium hydroxide is added to the moist disintegrated fiber material, whereby at least a portion thereof may associate with the water that is present in addition to the fiber material. The fiber material treated in this manner is then supplied with pure carbon dioxide or with a medium containing carbon dioxide. Moreover, the resulting CaCO3 may create a fiber stock suspension around the fibers.
Also, when loading the fibers with a particular additive or filler, the procedure as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,223,090 may specifically be followed.
A pre-treatment of the paper suspension is necessary for the aforementioned “Fiber Loading™” process. However, the problem is that hitherto no optimally suitable machine was available for such a process.
The present invention provides a pretreatment process and device which is optimally suitable for the aforementioned “Fiber Loading™” process.
Relative to the process, the treatment of the fiber stock suspension occurs at least partially, in a fluffer, in which the fiber material of the fiber suspension is separated in a manner so as to increase the specific surface of the fiber material so that the accessibility for the educts to the fiber material surface is optimized.
The fluffer may be located prior to, as well as after, at least one reactor or similar device. The specific surface of the fiber stock suspension is enlarged in the fluffer, resulting in a marked homogenization improvement and “Fiber Loading™” process optimization.
A process optimization is achieved by dividing the fiber material using toothed disks and/or fluffer knives, whereby the specific surface of the fiber material is increased so that the accessibility for the educts to the fiber material surface is optimized.
The working area of the fluffer is preferably pressurized. The appropriate pressure value may specifically be in an approximate range of 0.1–20 bar.
Advantageously, fiber stock suspension volume and mass flow rate are adjustable within an approximate range of 5 tons per day to 1500 tons per day.
The temperature of the fiber stock suspension having been subjected to the pre-treatment is appropriately adjustable within an approximate range of 5° C. to 250° C.
In accordance with one advantageous form of the process according to the invention, an additive, for example PCC (precipitated calcium carbonate) or FLPCC™ (fiber loaded precipitated calcium carbonate), is added to the fiber stock suspension, at an approximate ratio of 15% to 40% and, preferably, of 20% to 25%.
An approximate pH value of 10 to 13 can be set for the fiber stock suspension, particularly prior to the reaction with the CO2.
CaCO3 may be added prior to, in and/or after the fluffer to the fiber stock suspension.
For the temperature of the CaCO3, a preferred value of approximately −10° C. to approximately 250° C. is selected.
In principle it is also possible to add Ca(OH)2 (slaked lime) to the fiber stock suspension prior to, in and/or after the fluffer.
The Ca(OH)2 may be added specifically at a ratio of approximately 1% to approximately 60%.
The lime particle surface may, for example, be selected to be larger than 30,000 cm2/g.
The width of the nip between the fluffer disks is adjustable, preferably within a range of approximately 0.1 mm to approximately 100 mm.
The energy requirement is selected to be, preferably, within a range of approximately 5 kWh/t to approximately 200 kWh/t.
The device of the present invention comprises, in one form thereof, a fluffer that is equipped with a fiber stock suspension infeed device and that is configured for separating the fiber suspension's fiber material in a manner so as to enlarge the specific surface of the fiber material so that accessibility for the educts to the fiber surface is optimized.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention will be better understood by reference to the following description of an embodiment of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplification set out herein illustrates one preferred embodiment of the invention, in one form, and such exemplification is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Fluffer 10 includes fluffer disks 12 which are equipped with one or more tooth patterns and/or knives. Between adjoining fluffer disks 12, a gap 14 is formed in which the fiber material of the fiber stock suspension is divided in order to enlarge the specific surface of the fiber material. By such enlargement, the accessibility for the educts to the fiber material surface is optimized. Knives may be provided alternatively or in addition to one or more tooth patterns.
The fiber stock suspension is supplied to fluffer 10 through an inlet 16.
The fluffer 10 also includes, preferably, a variably adjustable fiber stock suspension outlet 18.
In the present example inlet 16 is positioned horizontally. In contrast, the fiber stock suspension, which is pre-treated in fluffer 10, is discharged vertically downward through outlet 18.
Fluffer 10 is connected to and driven by an electric motor 20 (see
Operating or working area 24 of fluffer 10 can be put under pressure. The preferably variably adjustable pressure value may, for example, be in the approximate range of 0.1 to 20 bar.
The volume and mass flow rate of the fiber stock suspension are adjustable, for example, within a range of approximately 5 tons per day to approximately 1500 tons per day.
The temperature of the fiber stock suspension that was pre-treated in fluffer 10 may, for example, be adjustable within a range of approximately 5° C. to approximately 250° C.
An additive, for example PCC (precipitated calcium carbonate) or FLPCC™ (fiber loaded precipitated calcium carbonate), is added to the fiber stock suspension at an approximate ratio of 15% to 40%, and preferably at a ratio of approximately 20% to approximately 25%.
The treatment of the fiber stock suspension may, for example, be conducted so that a pH-value of approximately 10 to approximately 13 is set prior to the reaction with the CO2.
Specifically, CaCO3 may be added prior to, in and/or after fluffer 10 to the fiber stock suspension. The temperature of the CaCO3 may, for example, be approximately −10° C. to approximately 250° C.
It is also possible to add Ca(OH)2 (slaked lime) to the fiber stock suspension prior to, in and/or after fluffer 10.
The Ca(OH)2 may be added specifically at a ratio of approximately 1% to approximately 60%.
A lime particle surface larger than 30,000 cm2/g would preferably be selected.
The width of nip 14 between fluffer disks 12 is adjustable, for example, within a range of approximately 0.1 mm to approximately 100 mm. A pusher 26 may be provided for this purpose, which would be adjustable in the direction of double arrow F (see
The energy requirement is preferably within an approximate range of 5 kWh/t to 200 kWh/t.
While this invention has been described as having a preferred design, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 26 304 | May 2000 | DE | national |
100 33 805 | Jul 2000 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3725193 | de Montigny et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3745645 | Kurth et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
4055903 | Hansen et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4229250 | Lehtinen | Oct 1980 | A |
4510020 | Green et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
5096539 | Allan | Mar 1992 | A |
5223090 | Klungness et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5275699 | Allan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5314583 | Kappel | May 1994 | A |
5324389 | Spencer | Jun 1994 | A |
5626300 | Kohler | May 1997 | A |
5630909 | LaRiviere | May 1997 | A |
5665205 | Srivatsa et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5731080 | Cousin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5810973 | Carlsmith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6074524 | Wu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077396 | LaRiviere | Jun 2000 | A |
6355138 | Doelle | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6533895 | Doelle et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6706148 | Joisson et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
40 25 616 | Nov 1999 | DE |
2 265 916 | Oct 1993 | GB |
WO 9949133 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9954045 | Oct 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20010045264 A1 | Nov 2001 | US |