Process and apparatus for a wavelength tuning source

Abstract
An apparatus and source arrangement for filtering an electromagnetic radiation can be provided which may include at least one spectral separating arrangement configured to physically separate one or more components of the electromagnetic radiation based on a frequency of the electromagnetic radiation. The apparatus and source arrangement may also have at least one continuously rotating optical arrangement which is configured to receive at least one signal that is associated with the one or more components. Further, the apparatus and source arrangement can include at least one beam selecting arrangement configured to receive the signal.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to optical systems and more particularly to an optical wavelength filter system for wavelength tuning.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Considerable effort has been devoted for developing rapidly and widely tunable wavelength laser sources for optical reflectometry, biomedical imaging, sensor interrogation, and tests and measurements. A narrow line width, wide-range and rapid tuning have been obtained by the use of an intra-cavity narrow band wavelength scanning filter. Mode-hopping-free, single-frequency operation has been demonstrated in an extended-cavity semiconductor laser by using a diffraction grating filter design. Obtaining single-frequency laser operation and ensuring mode-hop-free tuning, however, may use a complicated mechanical apparatus and limit the maximum tuning speed. One of the fastest tuning speeds demonstrated so far has been limited less than 100 nm/s. In certain applications such as biomedical imaging, multiple-longitudinal mode operation, corresponding to an instantaneous line width as large or great than 10 GHz, may be sufficient. Such width may provide a ranging depth of a few millimeters in tissues in optical coherence tomography and a micrometer-level transverse resolution in spectrally-encoded confocal microscopy.


A line width on the order of 10 GHz is readily achievable with the use of an intra-cavity tuning element (such as an acousto-optic filter, Fabry-Perot filter, and galvanometer-driven diffraction grating filter). However, the sweep frequency previously demonstrated has been less than 1 kHz limited by finite tuning speeds of the filters. Higher-speed tuning with a repetition rate greater than 15 kHz may be needed for video-rate (>30 frames/s), high-resolution optical imaging in biomedical applications.


Accordingly, there is a need to overcome the above-described deficiencies.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the exemplary concepts of the present invention, an optical wavelength filter may be provided that can be tuned with a repetition rate of greater than 15 kHz over a wide spectral range. In addition, a wavelength tuning source comprising such optical filter in combination with a laser gain medium may be provided. The tuning source may be useful in video-rate optical imaging applications, such as the optical coherence tomography and spectrally encoded confocal microscope.


In general, the optical filter according to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention may include a diffraction grating, a rotating polygon scanner, and a telescope. Such optical filter can be operated at a tuning speed more than an order of magnitude higher than the conventional filters. The wavelength tunable light source may be implemented by employing the filter, e.g., in combination with a laser gain medium. The filter and gain medium may further, be incorporated into a laser cavity. For example, a laser can emit a narrow band spectrum with its center wavelength being swept over a broad wavelength range at a high repetition rate.


In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus is provided which includes an arrangement for emitting an electromagnetic radiation that has a spectrum whose mean frequency changes substantially continuously over time. Such radiation is may be associated with a tuning speed that is greater than 100 terahertz per millisecond. The mean frequency can change repeatedly at a repetition rate that is greater than 5 kilohertz or over a range greater than 10 terahertz. The spectrum may have a tuning range covering a portion of the visible, near-infrared or infrared wavelengths. Exemplary spectra may be centered at approximately at 850 nm, 1300 nm or 1700 nm wavelengths. Further, the spectrum may have an instantaneous line width that is smaller than 100 gigahertz. The apparatus may also include a laser cavity with a roundtrip length shorter than 5 m. The apparatus may also have a polygon scanner arrangement which may be adapted to receive at least a portion of the emitted electromagnetic radiation and reflect or deflect the portion to a further location. In addition, a beam separating arrangement can be provided which selectively receives components of the electromagnetic radiation.


According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention the apparatus for filtering an electromagnetic radiation can include at least one spectral separating arrangement configured to physically separate one or more components of the electromagnetic radiation based on a frequency of the electromagnetic radiation. The apparatus may also have at least one continuously rotating optical arrangement that is configured to receive the physically separated components and selectively direct individual components to a beam selecting arrangement.


In one exemplary variation of the present invention, the spectral separating arrangement includes a diffraction grating, a prism, a grism, an acousto-optic beam deflector, a virtual phased array, and/or an arrayed waveguide grating. The continuously rotating optical arrangement may be a polygon mirror, a diffractive element, a substantially opaque disk having an array of substantially transparent regions, and/or a substantially transparent disk having an array of substantially reflective regions. The spectral separating arrangement may also include a holographic grating mounted on a substrate comprising a continuously rotating optical arrangement.


In another exemplary variation of the present invention the beam selecting arrangement may be an optical fiber, an optical waveguide, a pinhole aperture, a combination of a lens with an optical fiber, waveguide or pinhole, and/or a spatial filter. The beam selecting arrangement can include a plurality of beam selecting elements, and the electromagnetic radiation which is transmitted by the plurality of beam selecting elements may be combined. The signal may be reflected multiple times from the continuously rotating optical arrangement before being received by the selecting arrangement.


According to yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention the apparatus for filtering an electromagnetic radiation may include at least one spectral separating arrangement configured to angularly separate one or more components of the electromagnetic radiation based on a frequency of the electromagnetic radiation. Such arrangement can also include at least one angularly deflecting optical arrangement that includes a pivot point, and that is configured to receive the components of the electromagnetic radiation and selectively direct the components to a beam selecting arrangement. Further, the arrangement can include at least one optical imaging arrangement configured to receive the components of the electromagnetic radiation and generate an image of one or more dispersive elements associated with the components. The position of the pivot point of the angularly deflecting optical arrangement may be provided in proximity to a real or virtual image of at least one of the dispersive elements.


In one exemplary variant of the present invention, a deflection point of the angularly deflecting optical element may substantially overlap with a real image of at least one of the dispersive elements. At least one reflector which is configured to receive at least one signal from the at least one angularly deflecting optical arrangement may also be provided. One or more of the dispersive elements may be a diffraction grating, a prism, a grism, an acousto-optic beam deflector, a virtual phased array, and/or an arrayed waveguide grating. The angularly deflecting optical element may be a polygon mirror scanner, a galvanometer mirror scanner, or a piezo-electric mirror scanner.


According to still another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus is provided for filtering an electromagnetic radiation. The apparatus includes at least one dispersive arrangement configured to angularly separate components of the electromagnetic radiation based on a frequency of the electromagnetic radiation, and generate frequency-separated components. The apparatus may also include at least one angularly deflecting optical element having a pivot point of an angular deflection. The pivot point can substantially overlap a location where substantially all of the frequency-separated components overlap.


In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, at least one spectral separating arrangement can be provided that is configured to physically separate one or more components of the electromagnetic radiation based on a frequency of the electromagnetic radiation. In addition, at least one continuously rotating optical arrangement may be included which is configured to receive at least one signal that is associated with the one or more components. At least one beam selecting arrangement may also be configured to receive the signal. The emitter can be a laser gain medium, a semiconductor optical amplifier, a laser diode, a super-luminescent diode, a doped optical fiber, a doped laser crystal, a doped laser glass, and/or a laser dye.


In still another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a source arrangement can provide an electromagnetic radiation. The source includes at least one emitter of the electromagnetic radiation, at least one spectral separating arrangement configured to angularly separate one or more components of the electromagnetic radiation based on a frequency of the electromagnetic radiation, as well as at least one angularly deflecting optical arrangement that includes a pivot point, and configured to receive the components of the electromagnetic radiation to generate at least one signal associated with the one or more components. In addition, the source arrangement can include at least one beam selecting arrangement adapted to receive the signal, and selectively generate at least one selected signal, and at least one optical imaging arrangement configured to received the selected signal, and generate an image of one or more dispersive elements associated with the one or more components. In a variation of the present invention, more than one laser gain medium providing electromagnetic radiation and at least one spectral separating arrangement configured to physically separate one or more components of the electromagnetic radiation based on a frequency of the electromagnetic radiation can be provided. In this variation, the selected components of electromagnetic radiation from each laser gain medium are synchronized, and can be used separately or combined.


In one further exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a high-speed tuning of an extended-cavity semiconductor laser may be provided. The laser resonator may include a unidirectional fiber-optic ring, a semiconductor optical amplifier as the gain medium, and a scanning filter based on a polygon scanner. Variable tuning rates of up to 1,150 nm/ms (15.7 kHz repetition frequency) can be obtained over a 70 nm wavelength span centered at 1.32 μm. Such tuning rate can be more than an order of magnitude faster than is conventionally know, and may be facilitated in part by self-frequency shifting in the semiconductor optical amplifier. The instantaneous line width of the source may be <0.1 nm for 9-mW cw output power, and a low spontaneous-emission background of 80 dB can be obtained.


Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, when taken in conjunction with the appended claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further objects, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures showing illustrative embodiments of the invention, in which:



FIG. 1A is a block diagram of a first exemplary embodiment of an optical wavelength filter according to the present invention;



FIG. 1B is a block diagram of a second exemplary embodiment of the optical wavelength filter according to the present invention;



FIG. 1C is a block diagram of a third exemplary embodiment of the optical wavelength filter according to the present invention;



FIG. 1D is a block diagram of a fourth exemplary embodiment of the optical wavelength filter according to the present invention;



FIG. 1E is a block diagram of a fifth exemplary embodiment of the optical wavelength filter according to the present invention;



FIG. 1F is a block diagram of a sixth exemplary embodiment of the optical wavelength filter according to the present invention;



FIG. 1G is a block diagram of a seventh exemplary embodiment of the optical wavelength filter according to the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a graph of exemplary characteristics of the optical wavelength filter according to the present invention;



FIG. 3 is an exemplary embodiment of the wavelength tuning laser source according to the present invention;



FIG. 4A is a graph of exemplary first output characteristics (laser spectrum vs. wavelength) of the laser source according to the present invention;



FIG. 4B is a graph of exemplary second output characteristics (output power vs. time) of the laser source according to the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a graph of exemplary output power provided as a function of sweep speed according to the present invention;



FIG. 6 is an exemplary embodiment of a free-space extended-cavity semiconductor tunable laser arrangement according to the present invention;



FIG. 7 is an illustration of a seventh exemplary embodiment of the optical wavelength filter according to the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a spectrally-encoded confocal microscope that utilizes the tunable laser source according to the present invention;



FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a frequency-domain optical coherence tomography arrangement that utilizes the tunable laser source according to the present invention;



FIG. 10A is a top view of an eighth exemplary embodiment of the wavelength filter according to the present invention; and



FIG. 10B is a perspective plan view of the wavelength filter shown in FIG. 10A.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1A shows a block diagram of a first exemplary embodiment of an optical wavelength filter 1 in accordance the present invention. In this first exemplary embodiment, the optical wavelength filter 1 can be used in a variety of different applications, general examples of which are described below. In this example, the filter 1 may be coupled to one or more applications 3 via a light source 2. It should be understood that in certain exemplary applications, the filter 1 can be used with or connected to an application (e.g., one or more of the applications 3) via a device other than a light source (e.g. a passive or active optical element). In the first exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 1A, a broad spectrum light source and/or controller 2 (hereinafter referred to as “light controller”), may be coupled to a wavelength dispersing element 4. The light controller 2 can be further coupled to one or more of the applications 3 that are adapted to perform one or more tasks with or for, including but not limited to, optical imaging processes and optical imaging systems, laser machining processes and systems, photolithography and photolithographic systems, laser topography systems, telecommunications processes and systems, etc. The wavelength dispersing element 4 can be coupled to a lens system 6, which is further coupled to a beam deflection device 8.


The light controller 2 can be one or more of various systems and/or arrangements that are configured to transmit a beam of light having a broad frequency (f) spectrum. In one exemplary embodiment, the beam of light may be a collimated beam of light The beam of light can include a plurality of wavelengths λ . . . λn, within the visible light spectrum (e.g., red, blue, green). Similarly, the beam of light provided by the light controller 2 can also include a plurality of wavelengths λ . . . λn that may be defined outside of the visible spectrum (e.g., ultraviolet, near infrared or infrared). In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the light controller 2 can include a unidirectional light transmission ring, which shall be described in further detail below in connection with FIG. 3 which shows an exemplary embodiment of a wavelength tuning laser source. Further, in another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the light controller 2 can include a linear resonator system, which shall be described in further detail below in connection with FIG. 6.


The wavelength dispersing element 4 of the optical wavelength filter 1 can include one or more elements that are specifically adapted to receive the beam of light from the light controller 2, and to conventionally separate the beam of light into a plurality of wavelengths of light having a number of directions. The wavelength dispersing element 4 is further operative to direct portions of light having different wavelengths in equal angular directions or displacements with respect to an optical axis 38. In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the wavelength dispersing element 4 can include a light dispersion element, which may include but not limited to, a reflection grating, a transmission grating, a prism, a diffraction grating, an acousto-optic diffraction cell or combinations of one or more of these elements.


The lens system 6 of the optical wavelength filter 1 can include one or more optical elements adapted to receive the separated wavelengths of light from the wavelength dispersing element. Light at each wavelength propagates along a path which is at an angle with respect to the optical axis 38. The angle is determined by the wavelength dispersing element 4. Furthermore, the lens system 6 is adapted to direct or steer and/or focus the wavelengths of light to a predetermined position located on a beam deflection device 8.


The beam deflection device 8 can be controlled to receive and selectively redirect one or more discrete wavelengths of light back along the optical axis 38 through the lens system 6 to the wavelength dispersing element 4 and back to the light controller 2. Thereafter, the light controller 2 can selectively direct the received discrete wavelengths of light to any one or more of the applications. The beam deflecting device 8 can be provided in many different ways. For example, the beam deflecting device 8 can be provided from elements including, but not limited to, a polygonal mirror, a planar mirror disposed on a rotating shaft, a mirror disposed on a galvonmeter, or an acousto-optic modulator.



FIG. 1B shows a schematic diagram of a second exemplary embodiment of the optical wavelength filter 1′. The exemplary optical wavelength filter 1′ can be configured as a reflection-type filter which may have substantially identical input and output ports. An input/output optical fiber 10 and a collimating lens 12 can provide an input from a light controller 2′ (which may be substantially similar to the light controller 2 described above with reference to FIG. 1A) to the optical wavelength filter 1′. The optical wavelength filter 1′ includes a diffraction grating 16, optical telescoping elements 6′ (hereinafter referred to as “telescope 6′” and may possibly be similar to the lens system 6 of FIG. 1A), and a polygon mirror scanner 24. The telescope 6′ can include two lenses, e.g., first and second lenses 20, 22 with 4-f configuration.


In the second exemplary embodiment of the optical wavelength filter 1′ shown in FIG. 1B, the telescope 6′ includes the first and second lenses 20, 22, which are each substantially centered along the optical axis 38. The first lens 20 may be located at a first distance from the wavelength dispensing element 4′ (e.g., diffraction grating 16), which can approximately be equal to the focal length F1 of the first lens 20. The second lens 22 may be located at a second distance from the first lens 20, which can be approximately equal to the sum of the focal length F1 of the first lens 20 and the focal length F2 of the second lens 22. Using such arrangement, the first lens 20 can receive one or more collimated discrete wavelengths of light from the wavelength dispersing element 4′, and can effectively perform a Fourier Transform on each one of the collimated one or more discrete wavelengths of light to provide one or more approximately equal converging beams that are projected onto an image plane IP.


The image plane IP is preferably located between the first lens 20 and the second lens 22 and at a predetermined distance from the first lens 20. According to one exemplary variation of the present invention, such predetermined distance may be defined by the focal length F1 of the first lens 20. After such one or more converging beams are propagated through the image plane IP, these one or more converging beams form equal or corresponding one or more diverging beams that are received by the second lens 22. The second lens 22 is adapted to receive the diverging beams and provide approximately an equal number of collimated beams having predetermined angular displacements with respect to the optical axis 38. Thus, the second lens 22 can direct or steer the collimated beams to predefined portions of the beam deflection device 8′.


The telescope 6′ according to the second exemplary embodiment of the present invention is operative to provide one or more features as described above, as well as to convert a diverging angular dispersion from the grating into converging angular dispersion after the second lens 22. Such result may be advantageous for a proper operation of the filter. In addition, the telescope 6′ may provide adjustable parameters which control the tuning range and linewidth and reduce the beam size at the polygon mirror to avoid beam clipping. As is illustrated in the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1B, a beam deflection device 6′ (e.g., which may include a polygon mirror or arrangement 24) is adapted to preferably reflect back only the spectral component within a narrow passband as a function of the angle of the front mirror facet of the polygon arrangement 24 with respect to the optic axis 38. The reflected narrow band light is diffracted and received by the optical fiber 10. The orientation of the incident beam 30 with respect to the optic axis and a rotation direction 40 of the polygon arrangement 24 can be used to determine the direction of wavelength tuning, e.g., a wavelength up (positive) scan or a wavelength down (negative) scan. The exemplary arrangement shown in FIG. 1B can generate a positive wavelength sweep. It should be understood that although the polygon arrangement 24 is shown in FIG. 1B as having twelve facets, polygon arrangements which have fewer than twelve facets or greater than twelve facets can also be used. While generally not considering practical mechanical limits, based upon conventional manufacturing techniques, a particular number of facets of the polygon arrangement 24 to use in any application may depend on a desired scanning rate and a scanning range for a particular application.


Furthermore, the size of the polygon arrangement 24 may be selected based on preferences of a particular application, and preferably taking into account certain factors including, but not limited to, manufacturability and weight of the polygon arrangement 24. It should also be understood that lenses 20, 22 that have different focal lengths may be provided. For example, the lenses 20, 22 should be selected to provide a focal point at approximately the center point 24a of the polygon arrangement 24.


In one exemplary embodiment, a Gaussian beam 30 can be utilized with a broad optical spectrum incident to the grating from the fiber collimator 12. The well-known grating equation is expressed as λ=p·(sin α+sin β) where λ is the optical wavelength, p is the grating pitch, and α and β are the incident and diffracted angles of the beam with respect to the normal axis 42 of the grating, respectively. The center wavelength of tuning range of the filter may be defined by λ0=p·(sin α+sin β0) where β0 is the angle between the optic axis 38 of the telescope and the grating normal axis. FWHM bandwidth of the filter is defined by (δλ)FWHM0=A·(p/m)cos α/W, where A=√{square root over (4 ln 2)}/π for double pass, m is the diffraction order, and W is 1/e2-width of the Gaussian beam at the fiber collimator.


Tuning range of the filter may be limited by the finite numerical aperture of the first lens 20. The acceptance angle of the first lens 20 without beam clipping may be defined by Δβ=(D1−W cos β0/cos α)/F1, where Dl and Fl are the diameter and focal length of the first lens 20. Such formulation relates to the filter tuning range via Δλ=p cos β0·Δβ. One of exemplary design parameters of the filter, originated from the multiple facet nature of the polygon mirror, is the free spectral range, which is described in the following. A spectral component after propagating through the first lens 20 and the second lens 22 may have a beam propagation axis at an angle β′ with respect to the optic axis 38, e.g., β′=−(β−β0)·(F1/F2), where F1 and F2 are the focal lengths of the first lens 20 and the second lens 22, respectively. The polygon arrangement 24 may have a facet-to-facet polar angle given by θ=2π/N≈L/R, where L is the facet width, R is the radius of the polygon and N is the number of facets. If the range of β′ of incident spectrum is greater than the facet angle, i.e. Δβ′=Δβ·(F1/F2)>θ, the polygon arrangement 24 can retro-reflect more than one spectral component at a given time. The spacing of the multiple spectral components simultaneously reflected, or the free spectral range, can be defined as (Δλ)FSR=p cos β0(F1/F2)·θ. In an exemplary intra-cavity scanning filter application, the free spectral range of the filter should exceed the spectral range of the gain medium in order to avoid multiple frequency bands (in the case of an inhomogeneously broadened gain medium) or limited tuning range (in the case of a homogeneously broadened gain medium).


The duty cycle of laser tuning by the filter can be, for example, 100% with no excess loss caused by beam clipping if two preferable conditions are met as follows:









W
<



cos





α






F
1



cos





β






F
2




L





and





W

<



cos





α


cos






β
0






(


F
2

-
S

)

·
θ






(
1
)







The first equation may be derived from a condition that the beam width after the second lens 22 should be smaller than the facet width. The second equation can be derived from that the two beams at the lowest 32 and highest wavelengths 34 of the tuning range, respectively, which should not overlap each other at the polygon arrangement 24. S in equation (1) denotes the distance between the second lens 22 and the front mirror of the polygon arrangement 24.


It is possible to select the optical components with the following parameters: W=2.4 mm, p= 1/1200 mm, α=1.2 rad, β0=0.71 rad, m=1, D1=D2=25 mm, F1=100 mm, F2=45 mm, N=24, R=25 mm, L=6.54, S=5 mm, θ=0.26 rad, λ0=1320 nm. From the parameters, the theoretical FWHM bandwidth, tuning range and free spectral range of the filter could be calculated: (δλ)FWHM=0.09 nm, Δλ=126 nm and (Δλ)FSR=74 nm. Both conditions in equation (1) may be satisfied with particular margins.



FIG. 1C shows a diagram of a third exemplary embodiment of the wavelength tunable filter arrangement for doubling the tuning speed with the same polygon rotation speed according to the present invention. In this exemplary embodiment, the mirror surface of the polygon arrangement 24 is placed substantially a distance F2 from lens 22, and the beam of light is reflected with a non-zero angle (rather than directly being reflected back to the telescope from the polygon arrangement's 24 mirror facet). The sweep angle of the reflected light from the polygon arrangement 24 is double the polygon arrangement's 24 rotation angle. When the incident angle difference 90 between λ1 and λN with respect to the polygon arrangement 24 is approximately the same as the facet-to-facet angle 92 of the polygon, e.g., angle θ, the sweep angle 94 of the reflected light is 2θ for a rotation of the angle θ of the polygon arrangement 24. By placing two reflectors 100, 102, which preferably direct the reflected beam of light from the polygon arrangement 24 back to the polygon arrangement 24, and to the telescope (e.g., similar to the telescope 6′ of FIG. 1B), with the angle θ between each other, twice wavelength scans from λ1 to λN are achieved for the polygon rotation of the one facet-to-facet angle θ.


In FIG. 1D which shows a fourth exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the incident angle 90 difference between λ1 and λN to the polygon arrangement 24 is smaller than polygon facet-to facet angle 92, e.g., φ (=θ/K, where K>1). This can be achieved by reducing the grating pitch and increasing the F2/F1 ratio. In this exemplary embodiment, the filter tuning speed may be increased by factor of 2K without increasing either the rotation speed of the polygon arrangement 24 or the number of facets of the polygon arrangement 24.


The filter tuning speed can be further increased by having the beam of light reflected multiple times by the polygon arrangement 24. A fifth exemplary embodiment of the present invention, depicted in FIG. 1E, is an arrangement for increasing the tuning speed by factor of 4K, where K is the ratio of angle 92 to angle 90 (K=θ/φ). The beam of light is reflected twice (e.g., four times round trip) by the polygon arrangement 24, so that the sweep angle 94 of the reflected light becomes angle 4θ, and the tuning speed becomes 4K times faster. Such reflection can also be assisted with the reflection of surfaces 100, 102, 104, 106 and 108. This exemplary embodiment of the filter arrangement can be used to broaden the free spectral range (“FSR”) of the filter. For example, if one of the final reflectors 102 in the embodiment shown in FIG. 1E is removed, the FSR of the filter may become twice broader. It is likely that there is no tuning speed enhancement in such case. Similarly, it is possible to retain only one final reflector 100 in FIG. 1E. The FSR in this embodiment can become four times broader.



FIG. 1F shows a sixth exemplary embodiment of the present invention which provides a polygon tuning filter accommodating two light inputs and outputs. For example, in order to support two or more inputs and outputs of this filter, two or more sets of optical arrangements, each respective set including an input/output fiber 10, 10′, a collimating lens 12, 12′, a diffraction grating 16, 16′, and a telescope, may share the same polygon arrangement 24. Because the scanning mirror of the polygon arrangement 24 is structurally isotropic about the rotation axis, certain optical arrangements that can deliver the beams of light to the polygon arrangement 24 can be accommodated from any directions. Since both sets of optical arrangement in the embodiment of FIG. 1F utilize the same polygon scanner, their respective scanning optical transmission spectra are synchronized. It should be understood that the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1F can be extended to include multiple (greater than 2) optical arrangements each having its own input and output optical channel.


One exemplary application of the above-described polygon tuning filter according to the sixth embodiment of the present invention may be a wide band wavelength scanning light source. In FIG. 1G which shows a seventh exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a first broadband light source 60 provides a light signal which may have a wavelength λ1 to λi, and a second broadband light source 600 provides another light signal having a wavelength λi-j to λN. When the two optical arrangements supporting the wavelengths λ1 to λi and the wavelengths λi-j to λN, respectively, are synchronized to output approximately the same wavelength at the same instance, such exemplary arrangement may become a wide band wavelength scanning light source with linear scan rate from λ1 to λN. Since the FSR of the polygon scanning filter can be adjusted to be 200 nm or wider without any optical performance degradation, two or more broadband light sources with different center wavelengths can be combined with this filter to provide linear scanning light source over 200 nm tuning bandwidth. It should be understood that the embodiment of FIG. 1G can be extended to include multiple (e.g., greater than 2) optical arrangements and multiple (e.g., greater than 2) broadband light sources.


The exemplary embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1G can also be configured so that the wavelength tuning bands of each optical arrangement and broadband light source are discontinuous. In such a configuration, the tuning bands can be swept in a continuous or discontinuous sequential manner or be swept simultaneously.



FIG. 2 shows an exemplary graph of measured characteristics of the filter according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The normalized reflection spectrum of the filter, e.g., a curve 48, may be measured by using broadband amplifier spontaneous emission light from a semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) and an optical spectrum analyzer. The optical spectrum analyzer can obtain or record a normalized throughput (reflected) spectrum in peak-hold mode while the polygon arrangement 24 spins at its maximum speed of 15.7 kHz. The measured tuning range may be 90 nm which is substantially smaller than the theoretical value of 126 nm. It is possible to have a discrepancy which may be due to an aberration of the telescope 6′, primarily field curvature, associated with relatively large angular divergence of the beam from the grating. Such aberration can be corrected using optimized lens designs well known in the art. A curve 46 shown in FIG. 2 illustrates the throughput spectrum when the polygon arrangement is static at a particular position. The observed free spectral range is 73.5 nm, in agreement with a theoretical calculation. The FWHM bandwidth of curve 46 was measured to be 0.12 nm. The discrepancy between the measured FWHM and the theoretical limit of 0.09 nm is reasonable considering the aberration and imperfection of the optical elements.



FIG. 3 shows an exemplary embodiment of the wavelength tuning laser source according to the present invention. For example, the polygon-based filter can be incorporated into an extended-cavity semiconductor laser via a Faraday circulator 50. Intra-cavity elements may be connected by single-mode optical fibers 10. The gain medium may be a semiconductor optical amplifier 52 (e.g., SOA, Philips, CQF 882/e). Laser output 72 may be obtained via the 90% port of a fiber-optic fused coupler 70. Two polarization controllers 64, 62 can be used to align the polarization states of the intra-cavity light to the axes of maximum efficiency of the grating 16, and of the maximum gain of the SOA 50. A current source 54 may provide an injection current to the SOA 50. The polygon arrangement 24 may be driven and controlled by a motor driver 97. To generate a sync signal useful for potential applications, approximately 5% of the laser output may be directed to a photodetector 82 through a variable wavelength filter 80 with bandwidth of 0.12 nm. In this exemplary implementation, the center wavelength of the filter was fixed at 1290 nm. The detector signal can generate short pulses when the output wavelength of the laser is swept through the narrow passband of the fixed-wavelength filter. The timing of the sync pulse may be controlled by changing the center wavelength of the filter.



FIG. 4A shows a graph of exemplary first output characteristics (laser spectrum vs. wavelength) of the laser source according to the present invention, and FIG. 4B is a graph of exemplary second output characteristics (output power vs. time) of the laser source according to the present invention. Turning to FIG. 4A, curve 110 represents the output spectrum of the laser measured by the optical spectrum analyzer in peak-hold mode, e.g., when the polygon arrangement spins at 15.7 kHz. The edge-to-edge sweep range was observed to be from 1282 nm to 1355 nm, equal to the free-spectral range of the filter. The Gaussian-like profile of the measured spectrum, rather than a square profile, can be mainly due to the polarization-dependent cavity loss caused by polarization sensitivity of the filter and the birefringence in the cavity. It may be preferable to adjust the polarization controllers to obtain the maximum sweep range and output power. In FIG. 4B, curve 114 is the output of the exemplary laser in the time domain. The upper trace 112 is the sync signal which may be obtained through the fixed-wavelength filter. The amplitude of power variation from facet to facet was less than 3.5%. The peak and average output power was 9 mW and 6 mW, respectively. The y-axis scale of the curve 110 of FIG. 4A can be calibrated from the time-domain measurement, because the optical spectrum analyzer records a time-averaged spectrum due to the laser tuning speed being much faster than the sweep speed of the spectrum analyzer.


A frequency downshift in the optical spectrum of the intra-cavity laser light may arise as the light passes through the SOA gain medium, as a result of an intraband four-wave mixing phenomenon. In the presence of the frequency downshift, greater output power can be generated by operating the wavelength scanning filter in the positive wavelength sweep direction. FIG. 5 shows an exemplary illustration of a normalized peak power of the laser output measured as a function of the tuning speed. The negative tuning speed can be obtained by flipping the position of the collimator and the orientation of the grating with respect to the optic axis 38 of the exemplary embodiment of the arrangement according to the present invention. It is preferable to make the physical parameters of the filter identical in both tuning directions. The result shows that the combined action of self-frequency shift and positive tuning allows higher output to be obtained and enables the laser to be operated at higher tuning speed as is demonstrated in the curve 120. Therefore, the positive wavelength scan may be the preferable operation. The output power can be decreased with an increasing tuning speed. A short cavity length may be desired to reduce the sensitivity of the output power to the tuning speed. In such case, a free-space laser cavity may be preferred.


An exemplary embodiment of a free-space extended-cavity semiconductor tunable laser arrangement according to the present invention is depicted in FIG. 6. A semiconductor waveguide 162 made on a substrate chip 160 can be coupled to the polygon scanning filter via a collimating lens 180. The front facet 164 thereof may be anti-reflection coated, and the output facet 166 may be cleaved or preferably coated with dielectrics to have an optimal reflectivity. The laser output 190 may be obtained through the output coupling lens 182. The sync output may be taken by using a lens 140, a pinhole 142, and a photodetector 144 positioned on the 0-th order diffraction path for the light which is on retro-reflection from the polygon scanner 24. The photodetector 144 can generate a short pulse when the focus of the optical beam of a particular wavelength sweeps through the pinhole 142. Other types of gain medium include but are not limited to rare-earth-ion doped fiber, Ti:Al2O3, and Cr3+:forsterite. The first and second lenses 20, 22 can be preferably achromats with low aberration particularly in field curvature and coma. The collimating lenses 180, 182 are preferably aspheric lenses.



FIG. 7 shows another exemplary embodiment of the wavelength tunable filter which includes an input collimating lens 12, diffraction grating 16, focusing lens 200, and a spinning disk 210, as shown in FIG. 7. The diffraction grating 16 preferably has a concave curvature that has a focal length and may thus eliminate the need for the use of the focusing lens 200. The diffraction grating may be replaced by other angular dispersive elements such as a prism. Preferably more than one reflector 212 can be deposited on the surface of the spinning disk 210. Preferably, the reflectors 212 may include multiple narrow stripes periodically and radially patterned. The material for the reflectors is preferably gold. The disk 210 can be made of a lightweight plastic or silicon substrate. Instead of the reflectors deposited on the top surface of the disk, the disk can have a series of through holes followed by a single reflector attached to the back surface of the disk or supported independently from the disk. Incident from the optical fiber 10, the optical beams of different wavelengths are illuminated on the surface of the disk into a line after being diffracted by the grating 16 and focused by the lens 200. The beam that hits the reflectors of the spinning disk may be retro-reflected and received by the optical fiber 10. For example, a mirror 202 may be used to facilitate the access of the beam onto the disk.


The distance from the lens 200 to the reflectors of the disk 210 may be approximately equal to the focal length, F, of the lens 200. The tuning range of the filter may be given by Δλ=p cos β0 (D/F), where D denotes the distance between the stripes. The width of the strip, w, can preferably be substantially equal to the beam spot size, ws, at the surface of the disk:








w
s

=

W








cos






β
0



cos





α


·


F
/
z



1
+

f
/

z
2








,





where z=πws2/λ. Such formulation may lead to a FWHM filter bandwidth given by (δλ)FWHM0=A·(p/m)cos α/W where A=√{square root over (4 ln 2)}/π. For w>ws, the filter bandwidth may become greater, and for w<ws, the efficiency (reflectivity) of the filter can be decreased by beam clipping. The orientation of the incident beam 30 with respect to the optic axis of the lens 200 and the spinning direction 220 may determine the sense of wavelength tuning. The positive wavelength scan may be preferable, which is the case of the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 7.


Two exemplary applications of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described as follows. FIG. 8 shows a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the spectrally encoded confocal microscope (“SECM”) that uses the aforementioned tunable laser source 300. The basic principle of SECM has been described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,341,036, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. An exemplary probe 310 includes a transmission grating 312 provided between two silicon prisms 314, 316, a collimator 318, and a microscope objective lens 320. The probe is equipped with a micro actuator 322 to scan the beam onto a different location of the sample 330. The actuator 322 may be driven by an actuator driver 324 at substantially slower speed than the tuning speed of the laser source. The probe motion is preferably rotary or translational and is synchronized to the sync output of the laser source. In one example, the wavelength sweep frequency may be 15.7 kHz, and the probe scan frequency can be 30 Hz, which allows 30 frames of image to be obtained in 1 second. The objective lens 320 has a nigh numerical aperture to provide a transverse resolution of an order of micrometers and a confocal parameter of a few micrometers. The focus of the optical beam may be continuously scanned in time over the sample 330 by the swept output wavelength of the optical source and the scanning motion of the probe. The optical power returned from the sample is proportional to the reflectivity of the sample within a small section where the beam was focused down to a narrow waist at a given time. Two dimensional en-face image of the sample is constructed by a signal processor 344. The detector 340 is preferably an avalanche photodiode (“APD”) followed by a transimpedance amplifier 342. The reflected power may be received through a Faraday circulator 350 or a fiber-optic coupler.


Another exemplary application of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention is for optical coherence tomography (“OCT”) the details of which are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,956,355, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In one exemplary configuration, depicted in FIG. 9, an output of a tunable source 300 may be directed to a sample 330 through a fiber-optic coupler 410. An objective lens 412 in the probe may typically provide a focus near the surface or within the sample 330. The reference mirror 420 can be placed in a reference arm 120 at a position where an optical path length between two arms of the Michelson interferometer is substantially matched. Alternatively, the reference path can be configured in a transmissive, non-reflective configuration. The detector 430 may be a PIN photodiode followed by a transimpedance amplifier 432 with finite frequency bandwidth. The detector may preferably incorporate polarization diverse and dual balanced detection. The detector signal can be processed in the processor 434 through a fast Fourier transform to construct the depth image of the sample. The probe may be scanned by an actuator 414 and an actuator driver 416 to allow a 3-dimensional image of the sample to be obtained.



FIGS. 10A and 10B show a top and perspective view of another exemplary embodiment of the wavelength tunable filter according to the present invention. An angularly deflecting optical element 700 of this exemplary embodiment can be a rotating polygon arrangement 24 where the facets of the polygon are on the inner diameter of a hollow cylinder. A dispersing element 702 such as a diffraction grating can be placed at the center of the polygon arrangement 24. Light can be delivered to the grating through an optical fiber and collimated onto the grating so that each frequency component of the light is diffracted through a different angle (Θ). Only one narrow range of frequencies may be substantially orthogonal to one facet of the polygon arrangement 24, and therefore such frequency range may be reflected back to the diffraction grating and collected by the optical fiber 704/706. When the cylinder rotates, a surface normal direction for the illuminated polygon arrangement's facet may align with a new narrow frequency range. By rotating the cylinder, frequency tuning can thereby be achieved. When the cylinder rotation angle becomes large, an adjacent facet of the polygon arrangement 24 can become aligned with the light diffracted from the grating and the filter will repeat another frequency tuning cycle. The free spectral range and finesse can be controlled by appropriate choice of the polygon diameter, number of facets, collimated beam diameter and diffraction grating groove density.


The foregoing merely illustrates the principles of the invention. Various modifications and alterations to the described embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the teachings herein. For example, the invention described herein is usable with the exemplary methods, systems and apparatus described in U.S. Patent Application No. 60/514,769. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise numerous systems, arrangements and methods which, although not explicitly shown or described herein, embody the principles of the invention and are thus within the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: an arrangement configured to emit an electromagnetic radiation that has a spectrum whose mean frequency changes approximately linearly at a rate whose absolute value is greater than about 100 terahertz per millisecond.
  • 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mean frequency change of the spectrum repeats in a characteristic period that is less than about 200 microseconds.
  • 3. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the mean frequency changes over a range that is greater than about 10 terahertz.
  • 4. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the spectrum has an instantaneous line width that is smaller than about 100 gigahertz.
  • 5. The apparatus according to claim 2, further comprising a laser resonating system which forms an optical circuit and which is configured to control a spatial mode of the electromagnetic radiation.
  • 6. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the arrangement causes the electromagnetic radiation to propagate substantially unidirectionally within at least one portion of the resonating system.
  • 7. The apparatus according to claim 6, further comprising an optical circulator which is configured to control a direction of propagation of the electromagnetic radiation within the resonating system.
  • 8. The apparatus according to claim 5, further comprising an optical filtering system configured to at least one of transmit or reflect at least one portion of the electromagnetic radiation based on a frequency of the electromagnetic radiation, and wherein the at least one portion has a full-width-at-half-maximum frequency distribution which is less than about 100 GHz.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/861,179 filed Jun. 4, 2004. This application also claims priority from U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/476,600 filed on Jun. 6, 2003, and U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/514,769 filed on Oct. 27, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

The invention was made with the U.S. Government support under Grant Number DAMD17-99-2-9001 awarded by the U.S. Department of the Army and Grant Number BES-0086789 awarded by the National Science Foundation. Thus, the U.S. Government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (362)
Number Name Date Kind
2339754 Brace Jan 1944 A
3090753 Matuszak et al. May 1963 A
3601480 Randall Aug 1971 A
3856000 Chikama Dec 1974 A
3872407 Hughes Mar 1975 A
3941121 Olinger Mar 1976 A
3973219 Tang et al. Aug 1976 A
3983507 Tang et al. Sep 1976 A
4030827 Delhaye et al. Jun 1977 A
4030831 Gowrinathan Jun 1977 A
4140364 Yamashita et al. Feb 1979 A
4141362 Wurster Feb 1979 A
4224929 Furihata Sep 1980 A
4295738 Meltz et al. Oct 1981 A
4300816 Snitzer et al. Nov 1981 A
4303300 Pressiat et al. Dec 1981 A
4428643 Kay Jan 1984 A
4479499 Alfano Oct 1984 A
4533247 Epworth Aug 1985 A
4585349 Gross et al. Apr 1986 A
4601036 Faxvog et al. Jul 1986 A
4607622 Fritch et al. Aug 1986 A
4631498 Cutler Dec 1986 A
4650327 Ogi Mar 1987 A
4744656 Moran et al. May 1988 A
4751706 Rohde et al. Jun 1988 A
4763977 Kawasaki et al. Aug 1988 A
4770492 Levin et al. Sep 1988 A
4827907 Tashiro et al. May 1989 A
4834111 Khanna et al. May 1989 A
4868834 Fox et al. Sep 1989 A
4890901 Cross, Jr. Jan 1990 A
4892406 Waters Jan 1990 A
4905169 Buican et al. Feb 1990 A
4909631 Tan et al. Mar 1990 A
4925302 Cutler May 1990 A
4928005 Lefevre et al. May 1990 A
4965441 Picard Oct 1990 A
4965599 Roddy et al. Oct 1990 A
4993834 Carlhoff et al. Feb 1991 A
4998972 Chin et al. Mar 1991 A
5039193 Snow et al. Aug 1991 A
5040889 Keane Aug 1991 A
5045936 Lobb et al. Sep 1991 A
5046501 Crilly Sep 1991 A
5065331 Vachon et al. Nov 1991 A
5085496 Yoshida et al. Feb 1992 A
5120953 Harris Jun 1992 A
5121983 Lee Jun 1992 A
5127730 Brelje et al. Jul 1992 A
5197470 Helfer et al. Mar 1993 A
5202745 Sorin et al. Apr 1993 A
5208651 Buican May 1993 A
5212667 Tomlinson et al. May 1993 A
5214538 Lobb May 1993 A
5228001 Birge et al. Jul 1993 A
5241364 Kimura et al. Aug 1993 A
5248876 Kerstens et al. Sep 1993 A
5250186 Dollinger et al. Oct 1993 A
5262644 Maguire Nov 1993 A
5275594 Baker et al. Jan 1994 A
5291885 Taniji et al. Mar 1994 A
5293872 Alfano et al. Mar 1994 A
5293873 Fang Mar 1994 A
5304173 Kittrell et al. Apr 1994 A
5304810 Amos Apr 1994 A
5305759 Kaneko et al. Apr 1994 A
5317389 Hochberg et al. May 1994 A
5318024 Kittrell et al. Jun 1994 A
5321501 Swanson et al. Jun 1994 A
5348003 Caro Sep 1994 A
5353790 Jacques et al. Oct 1994 A
5383467 Auer et al. Jan 1995 A
5394235 Takeuchi et al. Feb 1995 A
5404415 Mori et al. Apr 1995 A
5411016 Kume et al. May 1995 A
5419323 Kittrell et al. May 1995 A
5439000 Gunderson et al. Aug 1995 A
5441053 Lodder et al. Aug 1995 A
5450203 Penkethman Sep 1995 A
5454807 Lennox et al. Oct 1995 A
5459325 Hueton et al. Oct 1995 A
5459570 Swanson et al. Oct 1995 A
5465147 Swanson Nov 1995 A
5486701 Norton et al. Jan 1996 A
5491524 Hellmuth et al. Feb 1996 A
5491552 Knuttel Feb 1996 A
5526338 Hasman et al. Jun 1996 A
5555087 Miyagawa et al. Sep 1996 A
5562100 Kittrell et al. Oct 1996 A
5565986 Knüttel Oct 1996 A
5566267 Neuberger Oct 1996 A
5583342 Ichie Dec 1996 A
5590660 MacAulay et al. Jan 1997 A
5600486 Gal et al. Feb 1997 A
5601087 Gunderson et al. Feb 1997 A
5621830 Lucey et al. Apr 1997 A
5623336 Raab et al. Apr 1997 A
5635830 Itoh Jun 1997 A
5649924 Everett et al. Jul 1997 A
5697373 Richards-Kortum et al. Dec 1997 A
5698397 Zarling et al. Dec 1997 A
5710630 Essenpreis et al. Jan 1998 A
5716324 Toida Feb 1998 A
5719399 Alfano et al. Feb 1998 A
5730731 Mollenauer et al. Mar 1998 A
5735276 Lemelson Apr 1998 A
5740808 Panescu et al. Apr 1998 A
5748318 Maris et al. May 1998 A
5748598 Swanson et al. May 1998 A
5784352 Swanson et al. Jul 1998 A
5785651 Kuhn et al. Jul 1998 A
5795295 Hellmuth et al. Aug 1998 A
5801826 Williams Sep 1998 A
5803082 Stapleton et al. Sep 1998 A
5807261 Benaron et al. Sep 1998 A
5810719 Toida Sep 1998 A
5817144 Gregory Oct 1998 A
5840023 Oraevsky et al. Nov 1998 A
5840075 Mueller et al. Nov 1998 A
5842995 Mahadevan-Jansen et al. Dec 1998 A
5843000 Nishioka et al. Dec 1998 A
5843052 Benja-Athon Dec 1998 A
5847827 Fercher Dec 1998 A
5862273 Pelletier Jan 1999 A
5865754 Sevick-Muraca et al. Feb 1999 A
5867268 Gelikonov et al. Feb 1999 A
5871449 Brown Feb 1999 A
5872879 Hamm Feb 1999 A
5877856 Fercher Mar 1999 A
5887009 Mandella et al. Mar 1999 A
5892583 Li Apr 1999 A
5910839 Erskine et al. Jun 1999 A
5912764 Togino Jun 1999 A
5920373 Bille Jul 1999 A
5920390 Farahi et al. Jul 1999 A
5921926 Rolland et al. Jul 1999 A
5926592 De Boer et al. Jul 1999 A
5949929 Hamm Sep 1999 A
5951482 Winston et al. Sep 1999 A
5955737 Hallidy et al. Sep 1999 A
5956355 Swanson et al. Sep 1999 A
5968064 Selmon et al. Oct 1999 A
5975697 Podoleanu et al. Nov 1999 A
5983125 Alfano et al. Nov 1999 A
5987346 Benaron et al. Nov 1999 A
5991697 Nelson et al. Nov 1999 A
5994690 Kulkarni et al. Nov 1999 A
5995223 Power Nov 1999 A
6002480 Izatt et al. Dec 1999 A
6004314 Wei et al. Dec 1999 A
6006128 Izatt et al. Dec 1999 A
6010449 Selmon et al. Jan 2000 A
6014214 Li Jan 2000 A
6016197 Krivoshlykov Jan 2000 A
6020963 DiMarzio Feb 2000 A
6033721 Nassuphis Mar 2000 A
6044288 Wake et al. Mar 2000 A
6045511 Lutz et al. Apr 2000 A
6048742 Weyburne et al. Apr 2000 A
6053613 Wei et al. Apr 2000 A
6069698 Ozawa et al. May 2000 A
6078047 Mittleman et al. Jun 2000 A
6091496 Hill Jul 2000 A
6091984 Perelman et al. Jul 2000 A
6111645 Tearney et al. Aug 2000 A
6117128 Gregory Sep 2000 A
6120516 Selmon et al. Sep 2000 A
6134003 Tearney et al. Oct 2000 A
6134010 Zavislan Oct 2000 A
6134033 Bergano et al. Oct 2000 A
6141577 Rolland et al. Oct 2000 A
6151522 Alfano et al. Nov 2000 A
6159445 Klaveness et al. Dec 2000 A
6160826 Swanson et al. Dec 2000 A
6161031 Hochmann et al. Dec 2000 A
6166373 Mao Dec 2000 A
6174291 McMahon et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175669 Colston et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185271 Kinsinger Feb 2001 B1
6191862 Swanson et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193676 Winston et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198956 Dunne Mar 2001 B1
6201989 Whitehead et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208415 De Boer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208887 Clarke Mar 2001 B1
6245026 Campbell et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249349 Lauer Jun 2001 B1
6249381 Suganuma Jun 2001 B1
6263234 Engelhardt et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264610 Zhu Jul 2001 B1
6272376 Marcu et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274871 Dukor et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282011 Tearney et al. Aug 2001 B1
6297018 French et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308092 Hoyns Oct 2001 B1
6324419 Guzelsu et al. Nov 2001 B1
6341036 Tearney et al. Jan 2002 B1
6353693 Kano et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359692 Groot Mar 2002 B1
6374128 Toida et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377349 Fercher Apr 2002 B1
6384915 Everett et al. May 2002 B1
6393312 Hoyns May 2002 B1
6394964 Sievert, Jr. et al. May 2002 B1
6396941 Bacus et al. May 2002 B1
6421164 Tearney et al. Jul 2002 B2
6437867 Zeylikovich et al. Aug 2002 B2
6445485 Frigo et al. Sep 2002 B1
6445944 Ostrovsky Sep 2002 B1
6459487 Chen et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463313 Winston et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469846 Ebizuka et al. Oct 2002 B2
6475159 Casscells et al. Nov 2002 B1
6475210 Phelps et al. Nov 2002 B1
6477403 Eguchi et al. Nov 2002 B1
6485413 Boppart et al. Nov 2002 B1
6485482 Belef Nov 2002 B1
6501551 Tearney et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501878 Hughes et al. Dec 2002 B2
6517532 Altshuler et al. Feb 2003 B1
6538817 Farmer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6549801 Chen et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552796 Magnin et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556305 Aziz et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556853 Cabib et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558324 Von Behren et al. May 2003 B1
6564087 Pitris et al. May 2003 B1
6564089 Izatt et al. May 2003 B2
6567585 De Boer et al. May 2003 B2
6615071 Casscells, III et al. Sep 2003 B1
6622732 Constantz Sep 2003 B2
6680780 Fee Jan 2004 B1
6685885 Varma et al. Feb 2004 B2
6687007 Meigs Feb 2004 B1
6687010 Horii et al. Feb 2004 B1
6687036 Riza Feb 2004 B2
6701181 Tang et al. Mar 2004 B2
6721094 Sinclair et al. Apr 2004 B1
6738144 Dogariu et al. May 2004 B1
6741355 Drabarek May 2004 B2
6757467 Rogers Jun 2004 B1
6790175 Furusawa et al. Sep 2004 B1
6806963 Wälti et al. Oct 2004 B1
6816743 Moreno et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831781 Tearney et al. Dec 2004 B2
6839496 Mills et al. Jan 2005 B1
6882432 Deck Apr 2005 B2
6903820 Wang Jun 2005 B2
6909105 Heintzmann et al. Jun 2005 B1
6949072 Furnish et al. Sep 2005 B2
6961123 Wang et al. Nov 2005 B1
6980299 de Boer Dec 2005 B1
7006231 Ostrovsky et al. Feb 2006 B2
7019838 Izatt et al. Mar 2006 B2
7061622 Rollins et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072047 Westphal et al. Jul 2006 B2
7075658 Izatt et al. Jul 2006 B2
7099358 Chong et al. Aug 2006 B1
7130320 Tobiason et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142835 Paulus Nov 2006 B2
7190464 Alphonse Mar 2007 B2
7231243 Tearney et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236637 Sirohey et al. Jun 2007 B2
7242480 Alphonse Jul 2007 B2
7267494 Deng et al. Sep 2007 B2
7304798 Izumi et al. Dec 2007 B2
7336366 Choma et al. Feb 2008 B2
7355716 De Boer et al. Apr 2008 B2
7355721 Quadling et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359062 Chen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366376 Shishkov et al. Apr 2008 B2
7391520 Zhou et al. Jun 2008 B2
7609391 Betzig Oct 2009 B2
20010047137 Moreno et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020016533 Marchitto et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020024015 Hoffmann et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020048025 Takaoka Apr 2002 A1
20020048026 Isshiki et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052547 Toida May 2002 A1
20020057431 Fateley et al. May 2002 A1
20020064341 Fauver et al. May 2002 A1
20020076152 Hughes et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020085209 Mittleman et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091322 Chaiken et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020093662 Chen et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020109851 Deck Aug 2002 A1
20020122246 Tearney et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140942 Fee et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020158211 Gillispie Oct 2002 A1
20020161357 Anderson et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163622 Magnin et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020168158 Furusawa et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020172485 Keaton et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020183623 Tang et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188204 McNamara et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020196446 Roth et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198457 Tearney et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030023153 Izatt et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030026735 Nolte et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030028114 Casscells, III et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030030816 Eom et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030082105 Fischman et al. May 2003 A1
20030097048 Ryan et al. May 2003 A1
20030108911 Klimant et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120137 Pawluczyk et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135101 Webler Jul 2003 A1
20030137669 Rollins et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030164952 Deichmann et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030171691 Casscells, III et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174339 Feldchtein et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199769 Podoleanu et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030216719 Debenedictis et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220749 Chen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030236443 Cespedes et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002650 Mandrusov et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040054268 Esenaliev et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040072200 Rigler et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040075841 Van Neste et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040077949 Blofgett et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040086245 Farroni et al. May 2004 A1
20040100631 Bashkansky et al. May 2004 A1
20040100681 Bjarklev et al. May 2004 A1
20040126048 Dave et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133191 Momiuchi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040150829 Koch et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040150830 Chan Aug 2004 A1
20040152989 Puttappa et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040165184 Mizuno Aug 2004 A1
20040166593 Nolte et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040212808 Okawa et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040239938 Izatt Dec 2004 A1
20040254474 Seibel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040263843 Knopp et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050018133 Huang et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050018201 De Boer Jan 2005 A1
20050035295 Bouma et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050046837 Izumi et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050057680 Agan Mar 2005 A1
20050057756 Fang-Yen et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075547 Wang Apr 2005 A1
20050083534 Riza et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050119567 Choi et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050128488 Yelin et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165303 Kleen et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171438 Chen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060103850 Alphonse et al. May 2006 A1
20060146339 Fujita Jul 2006 A1
20060155193 Leonardi et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060184048 Saadat et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193352 Chong et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060244973 Yun et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070019208 Toida et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070070496 Gweon et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070086013 De Lega et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070133002 Wax et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070188855 Shishkov et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070223006 Tearney et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070291277 Everett et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080002197 Sun et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080049220 Izzia et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080097225 Tearney et al. Apr 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (82)
Number Date Country
4105221 Sep 1991 DE
4309056 Sep 1994 DE
19542955 May 1997 DE
10351319 Jun 2005 DE
0110201 Jun 1984 EP
0251062 Jan 1988 EP
0617286 Feb 1994 EP
0590268 Apr 1994 EP
0728440 Aug 1996 EP
0933096 Aug 1999 EP
1324051 Jul 2003 EP
1426799 Jun 2004 EP
2738343 Aug 1995 FR
1257778 Dec 1971 GB
2030313 Apr 1980 GB
2209221 May 1989 GB
2298054 Aug 1996 GB
6073405 Apr 1985 JP
04-056907 Feb 1992 JP
4135550 May 1992 JP
4135551 May 1992 JP
5509417 Nov 1993 JP
2002214127 Jul 2002 JP
2007271761 Oct 2007 JP
7900841 Oct 1979 WO
9201966 Feb 1992 WO
9216865 Oct 1992 WO
9219930 Nov 1992 WO
9303672 Mar 1993 WO
9216865 Oct 1993 WO
9533971 Dec 1995 WO
9628212 Sep 1996 WO
9732182 Sep 1997 WO
9800057 Jan 1998 WO
9801074 Jan 1998 WO
9814132 Apr 1998 WO
9835203 Aug 1998 WO
9838907 Sep 1998 WO
9846123 Oct 1998 WO
9848846 Nov 1998 WO
9848838 Nov 1998 WO
9944089 Feb 1999 WO
9905487 Feb 1999 WO
9944089 Sep 1999 WO
9957507 Nov 1999 WO
0058766 Oct 2000 WO
0101111 Jan 2001 WO
0108579 Feb 2001 WO
0127649 Apr 2001 WO
0138820 May 2001 WO
0142735 Jun 2001 WO
0236015 May 2002 WO
0238040 May 2002 WO
02053050 Jul 2002 WO
0254027 Jul 2002 WO
02084263 Oct 2002 WO
03020119 Mar 2003 WO
03046495 Jun 2003 WO
03046636 Jun 2003 WO
03052478 Jun 2003 WO
03062802 Jul 2003 WO
03062802 Jul 2003 WO
03105678 Dec 2003 WO
2004034869 Apr 2004 WO
20040457266 Jul 2004 WO
20040066824 Aug 2004 WO
2004088361 Oct 2004 WO
2004105598 Dec 2004 WO
20050000115 Jan 2005 WO
2005047813 May 2005 WO
2005054780 Jun 2005 WO
2005082225 Sep 2005 WO
2006014392 Feb 2006 WO
2006039091 Apr 2006 WO
2006004743 Jul 2006 WO
2006059109 Jul 2006 WO
2006124860 Nov 2006 WO
2006130797 Dec 2006 WO
2007028531 Mar 2007 WO
2007038787 Apr 2007 WO
2007083138 Jul 2007 WO
2007084995 Jul 2007 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080181263 A1 Jul 2008 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60476600 Jun 2003 US
60514769 Oct 2003 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10861179 Jun 2004 US
Child 11867953 US