This invention relates to a process for the production of alumina from aluminum trihydrate in which the trihydrate is dried and pre-heated, after which the remaining free and chemically-bonded water is removed when the trihydrate is converted by calcination to alumina and finally cooled to about 50-100° C. in two stages, where the calcined alumina through at least one stage is suspended in a gas and a cyclone that is utilized in the process.
The expression aluminium hydrate is used in trade and industry in reference to aluminum hydroxides. Various types of hydroxides are known, but the most well-defined crystalline forms are trihydrates, Al2(OH)3, gibbsite (α-Al2(OH)3), bayerite (β-Al2(OH)3), and nordstrandite.
The Bayer Process—an economical method of producing aluminium oxide—was discovered by an Austrian chemist Karl Bayer and patented in 1887.
The process dissolves the aluminium component of bauxite ore in sodium hydroxide (caustic soda); removes impurities from the solution; and precipitates alumina trihydrate which is then calcined to aluminium oxide. The final stage in the production of alumina by the Bayer process is the calcination of aluminium trihydrate:
Al2(OH)3+energy→Al2O3+3H2O
Calcined alumina is normally produced from gibbsite, and this trihydrate is converted by thermal decomposition to α-alumina, α-Al2O3 (corundum).
Calcination has traditionally been carried out in a rotary kiln so that both dehydration and recrystallisation take place continually in the kiln. The finished calcined product can then be partially cooled in a planetary cooler and this may be followed by cooling in a unit with a water-cooled fluid bed.
It is also known that calcination can take place in a fluid bed and in such an installation the primary cooling of the material will normally take place in a multiple-stage cyclone cooler with three to five stages, where the primary cooling can be followed by a secondary cooling stage, for instance in a water-cooled fluid bed.
Since about 1980 the use of a GSC—Gas Suspension Calciner—has been well known in the industry for the calcination of aluminium hydrate (see for example GB Patent no. 2097903).
In the production of alumina it is important that the breakdown of the alumina particles should as far as possible be minimized, since the breakdown of the particles leads to finer pulverization of the particles, which thus causes the development of dust and the resulting problems in handling the material.
It has been seen that particle breakdown is relatively great during the heat exchange process in multiple-stage cyclone coolers, and thus necessitates the production of stronger and larger-grained particles of hydrate, entailing further investment costs which have limited the cost-effectiveness of the use of fluid beds and GSC, which otherwise prove to be the most compact installations, require the least energy and are the most economical to install. It would be advantageous, therefore, to reduce the number of cyclone coolers utilized in the production of alumina.
The invention according to this application demonstrates a process for the production of alumina where the cooling of the calcined alumina in at least one stage is carried out in a countercurrent cyclone in which the cold gas creates a spirally-formed stream from the gas inlet to the gas outlet, in that the cooling gas is introduced tangentially into the countercurrent cyclone through the outer casing of the cyclone and is discharged through an opening close to the horizontal axis of the cyclone. The process is notable in that the countercurrent cyclone, as described in more detail below, will replace at least two, and at times all, of the cooling cyclones used in the prior art process.
In the present invention, the hot alumina is fed into the countercurrent cyclone close to and parallel with its horizontal axis, but radially displaced in relation to the axis, and is discharged through the base cone of the countercurrent cyclone.
A countercurrent cyclone of this type can wholly or partially replace a multiple-stage cyclone having three or more cyclone stages with the result that particle breakdown is considerably reduced while the full effect of the heat transfer is maintained and at the same time a better separation of the gas from the material is achieved. Furthermore, as a result of the very simple design of the countercurrent cyclone, it will be more economical to build an installation with a countercurrent cyclone.
A type of countercurrent cyclone suitable for this application is described in two Danish patents, No. 160586 and No. 161786. A countercurrent cyclone of this type has proved to give a minimal particle breakdown and extremely good heat transfer.
In the drawings, similar numerals refer to similar elements.
In the pre-heating cyclone the dried and pre-heated material is separated from the gas and the gas is led via a duct 5 to be cleaned in a unit 6 which by way of example may be an electrofilter. The material is led via duct 7 into a hot gas flow (0-100° C. cooler than the temperature the material is subject to in calciner 12) and is then led in suspension through duct 8 to a further pre-heating cyclone 9, in which the material is separated from the gas and led via duct 11 to the calciner 12. The gas is led via duct 10 to the drying unit as previously stated.
Calciner 12 in this example is a GSC—a Gas Suspension Calciner—in which the material will remain for a few seconds. In calciner 12 the material is heated to approximately 900-1500° C., and preferably to between approximately 1100-1200° C., by means of the burning of gaseous or liquid fuel, which is introduced at 15, and the material is then led further in suspension with carrier gas introduced into the calciner via duct 16a to the separating cyclone 13 where the material is separated from the carrier gas and led via duct 14 to the cooler. The separated gas is led via duct 8 first to a pre-heating cyclone 9 and then to drying unit 2.
In this prior art system the primary cooling unit consists of a multiple-stage cyclone cooler with four stages, illustrated as cyclones 15a, 15b, 15c and 15d, with riser pipes 16b, 16c and 16d. The material is introduced into the first cyclone 15a via a gas duct 16b and in the cyclone the material is separated from the gas and led via duct 17a to gas duct 16c. The gas, which has a temperature of approximately 600-800° C., is led via duct 16a to the base of the calciner 12.
The material which is suspended in the gas in gas duct 16c is led to cyclone 15b. From there the gas is led via duct 16b and the separated material is transported via duct 17b to a gas duct 16d, where it is again suspended in a gas and led to the third cyclone 15c.
From cyclone 15c the material is led via duct 17c to a gas duct 18, through which cold air is transported to the primary cooling unit and through this duct the material is carried in suspension to the last cyclone 15d, after which the gas is led to the third cyclone via duct 16d and the material is led via duct 17d to the secondary cooling unit 20. A convenient type of secondary cooling unit 20 is the fluid bed type to which cold gas is led via duct 22 and where the finished product is discharged for storage or for further processing via duct 21.
Referring now to
The hot alumina material is introduced into the cyclone parallel with, but radially dispersed from, the horizontal axis A-A′ of the countercurrent cyclone and in such a manner that immediately on introduction the hot alumina possesses a tangential velocity component in relation to the axis of the countercurrent cyclone, and that this velocity component rotates in the same direction around the axis as the spirally-formed cold gas flow and thereafter the material is transported for a time by said cold gas flow.
Cold gas for cooling the material is introduced into the countercurrent cyclone through duct 24. This duct 24 directs the cold gas flow tangentially into the cyclone and the gas forms a spiral flow inwards toward the cyclone axis A-A′, where there is a discharge outlet for the gas now pre-heated by heat transfer with the hot material. The pre-heated gas is then led forward via duct 26 to cyclone 15a.
The gas which is led away from the pre-heating cyclone 4 is sent to be cleaned, for instance in an electrofilter. The dust which settles out in cleaning unit 6 can then be led to the cooling system via duct 29, which leads the dust to material duct 7.
In the installation of
Cold gas for cooling the material is introduced into the countercurrent cyclone through duct 24. This duct 24 directs the cold gas flow tangentially into the cyclone and the gas forms a spiral flow inwards toward the cyclone axis, where there is a discharge outlet for the now pre-heated gas. The pre-heated gas is then led forward via duct 32 to the calciner 12.
The term “counter current” cyclone (hereafter alternatively “CCC”) as utilized herein is exemplified by cyclone 60 as illustrated in
As indicated, in traditional cyclones material enters the cyclone tangentially into the vertical wall of the cyclone and therefore first encounters the outermost portion of the swirling vortex. In the CCC utilized in the present invention, cooling gas enters cyclone 60 tangentially but in an upward direction through gas inlet 43. Thus, cooling gas swirls in a generally helical direction relative to a horizontal central axis of the cyclone. The hot material is delivered into the center of swirling vortex 46 of the cooling gas and therefore will have to work its way to outer vortex region 51 resulting in the material spending more time, relative to a traditional cyclone, in contact with the cooling gas. Depending on the velocity of the gas, cooled material above a predetermined weight will fall by gravity through material exit 52. Gas heated from contact with the hot material and any entrained material too light to fall by gravity through the swirling air within the cyclone will exit through gas outlet 53 which is located close to horizontal axis A-A′ in sidewall 54 (shown in
Tests were run utilizing both a primarily “conical” shaped CCC and a “standard” shaped CCC. The conical CCC of the present invention, as depicted in
The standard CCC of the present invention, as depicted in
The tests discussed below were made utilizing conical and standard CCCs with and without an interior heat insulating lining (not depicted). Such a lining can be positioned in the cone section of the CCC by spot welding or can be fitted therein friction tight.
Test runs were conducted utilizing various sizes and configurations of the CCC of the present invention.
The parameters tested were as follows:
In cyclones utilized in alumina processes high (preferably above 65%) separation efficiencies are desirable.
Thermal efficiencies in cyclones above 55% are desired in cyclones utilized in alumina processes.
The values set forth in the TABLE were observed for each of the cyclones tested:
The tests indicate that, in general, the CCCs of the present invention showed results which were, for the most part, better than what would be expected to be realized in cyclones utilized in alumina processes.
Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of this specification or from practice of the invention disclosed. It is intended that the specification be considered as exemplary only, with the true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.