The invention relates to a process and apparatus for the production of mouldings, especially ophthalmic lenses, such as contact lenses, according to the preamble of the respective independent patent claim.
In many production processes for mouldings, light is used, by means of which e.g. chemical reactions are initiated. This applies in particular (but not exclusively) to the production of contact lenses, especially the so-called “disposable contact lenses”, which—as their name suggests—are intended for wearing once and are thrown away after wearing. These disposable contact lenses are produced more or less fully automatically in a highly automated production process. The principle of such a production process is described for example in WO-A-98/42497.
In that part of the production process that is of particular significance to the present invention, after closing the mould or moulding tool in which a number of moulds are arranged, the starting material (which comprises e.g. a prepolymer and a photoinitiator) previously introduced into the respective contact lens mould, usually into the female mould half, is exposed to UV light of a specific intensity for a specific period of time. Polymerisation and/or crosslinking of the starting material thereby takes place, so that subsequently the mould contains a contact lens, which given an appropriate configuration of the mould, does not have to undergo any finishing operations.
The UV light emitted from the light source, e.g. a UV lamp, is guided to the individual moulds by light guides, for example in accordance with WO-A-01/00393. Here, liquid light guides are used in particular. These have particularly good properties both in respect of the transmission of UV light and in respect of the usable cross-sectional area and the homogeneous distribution of intensity of the emitting UV light. Preferably, a separate light guide is assigned to each mould.
The polymerisation and/or crosslinking of the starting material initiated with the assistance of the photoinitiators can be controlled with high local definition, by restricting the incoming light bundle, for example using a mask. What is critical is the transitions from “light” to “shade”, that is, the transition from areas at which light is still being applied and where polymerisation and/or crosslinking takes place (contact lens edge), to areas which are shaded by the screen and where consequently no polymerisation and/or crosslinking takes place.
A very strictly parallel light bundle always produces a sharply defined image of the edges of the screen and thus produces clean contact lens edges. Admittedly also, defects and impurities of the transparent area of the screen are reproduced in the photochemically polymerised and/or crosslinked contact lens. A less strictly parallel light bundle is more tolerant towards defects and impurities of the screen, though the sharpness of the edge (contact lens edge) is also more critical, since the transition from “light” to “shade” is no longer so abrupt. This disadvantage can be at least partly eliminated by exposing the starting material to precisely the amount of light needed to complete polymerisation and/or crosslinking. This threshold can be accentuated by adding small concentrations of polymerisation inhibitors (e.g. radical N-oxides).
Thus, the starting material must be exposed as precisely as possible to the amount of light required for complete polymerisation and/or crosslinking to take place. To do so, it is important to know the exact amount of light to be applied to the starting material. With this in mind, the intensity of the UV light is measured. What must be taken into consideration here, however, is the fact that photoinitiators have a spectral absorption specific to them at a specific wavelength, which cannot be changed in the case of a given formulation. For example, if the average intensity of the radiated UV light at this specific wavelength is changed because of changes to the optical components (e.g. through an exchange of components, ageing, batch variations, etc.), then the amount of light may be too little or too great at the relevant wavelength at which the photoinitiator absorbs.
Basically, the amount of light that is absorbed by the photoinitiator and thereby initiates polymerisation and/or crosslinking can be calculated by convoluting the excitation spectrum, which acts on the starting material, with the absorption spectrum of the photoinitiator (or to be more precise, with the remaining spectrum which does not pass through the starting material; the transmission spectrum is determined in this way, and if the excitation spectrum is known, the absorption spectrum can be determined from this). To do this, however, spectrometers are required, which have only limited suitability for use in a production process. This is because, on the one hand, they are very expensive, and on the other hand, they are not very robust and require skilled personnel to operate them.
In practice, therefore, UV radiometers are frequently used. These have a photoreceiver (e.g. a photodiode) which is sensitive over the entire spectral range, as well as a filter arranged in front of them. However, the filters are not very complex and cover only a very roughly defined wavelength range, which frequently does not conform with the spectral absorption of the photoinitiator, so that the measurement of UV light represents only a very rough guide to the amount of excitation light actually effective.
A change (exchange, ageing, batch variations) of optical components (e.g. light sources, lenses, mirrors, filters, light guides or materials for moulds of screen carriers) already discussed above can therefore lead to a very varying spectral composition of the excitation light. However, without precise knowledge of the spectral change, the effects on the photo-initiator and also on the photoreceiver cannot be predicted. Therefore, the differing spectral sensitivity of photoreceiver and photoinitiator has a substantial detrimental effect on the safe exposure of the starting material to a minimal amount of light, which is desired for the above-mentioned reasons (accuracy of the edge). An amount of light that is far too great, on the other hand, can lead to polymer degradation and—depending on the wavelength—also to accelerated ageing of optical components (e.g. of liquid light guides).
The problem underlying the present invention is to determine as precisely as possible the respective amount of excitation light at the wavelength of the spectral absorption of the photoinitiator, so that in the production process the relevant amount of light can always be controlled, namely the amount of light applied to the starting material at the wavelength of the spectral absorption of the photoinitiator.
This problem is solved by a process having the features of the independent process claim and by apparatus having the features of the independent apparatus claim. Advantageous variants of the process or further embodiments of the apparatus can be seen from the features of the dependent claims.
The fundamental concept of the invention is to adapt a simple, broadband photoreceiver very precisely to the sensitivity of the photoinitiator, so that when there is a change in the excitation light impinging on the starting material containing the photoinitiator, the photoreceiver “notices” this change precisely at the relevant wavelength at which the photoinitiator has its spectral absorption. Here, the cause of the change in excitation light is irrelevant; the first priority is to control whether the amount of light impinging on the starting material lies within predetermined tolerances.
In particular, according to the invention, a process for the production of moulds, especially ophthalmic lenses, such as contact lenses, is proposed, in which a broadband photoreceiver is used to measure the intensity of light, in front of which photoreceiver a filter is arranged, the transmission of which is designed such that the light passing through the filter and impinging on the photoreceiver corresponds in its intensity to the light absorbed by the photoinitiator on the basis of its spectral absorption at the wavelength from the predetermined wavelength range. The filter is thus designed such that the photoreceiver “sees” the excitation light as the photoinitiator “sees” it. In this way, the process allows the amount of excitation light at the relevant wavelength, namely the wavelength at which the photoinitiator has its spectral absorption, to be continuously controlled.
The above process is basically suitable also for light of wavelengths other than those in the UV range, nevertheless in the production of contact lenses, normally UV light is used, since the photoinitiators typically employed absorb in the UV range.
In a variant of the process according to the invention, a photoinitiator is used for example, which absorbs light in the UV-B range (ca. 280 nm-320 nm). In addition, in this variant, a low-pass filter is used, which is designed and arranged such that only light of a wavelength above the threshold wavelength of the low-pass filter impinges the filter arranged in front of the photoreceiver or the photoinitiator in the starting material, respectively, wherein the threshold wavelength of the low-pass filter lies in the UV-B range and below the wavelength of the impinging light. The filter arranged in front of the photoreceiver is thereby formed as a narrow-band filter with a transmission above the threshold wavelength of the low-pass filter.
This variant is advantageous since short-wave light, which can lead to polymer degradation of the contact lens material and in addition also to accelerated ageing of the liquid light guide, is blocked from the beginning by the low-pass filter.
In addition, only that range of spectral absorption of the photoinitiator, which lies above the threshold wavelength of the low-pass filter, must be reproduced through the filter arranged in front of the photoreceiver, since light below this threshold wavelength cannot impinge at all on the starting material containing the photoinitiator (it is blocked by the low-pass filter) and therefore the sensitivity of the photoinitiator below the threshold wavelength of the low-pass filter does not play a role. This reduces the complexity of the structural design of the filter, since the photoinitiator typically absorbs not exclusively in the UV-B range, but partly also in the UV-C range. However, this range need no longer be “reproduced” by the filter, since owing to the low-pass filter being connected, light from this wavelength range can no longer impinge on the filter or the starting material containing the photoinitiator.
In addition, this variant allows the process to be more robust, especially if a light source is used, which emits light of a wavelength which is in fact in the UV-B range, that is, in the absorption range of the photoinitiator, but at a wavelength at which the absorption of the photoinitiator is relatively low. Then, of course, the length of time during which the contact lens material, which contains the photoinitiator, is exposed to light is not so critical as it would be when the light is of a wavelength at which the photoinitiator has e.g. its absorption maximum. Too great amounts of radiated light (light doses) can, of course, as already mentioned initially, on the one hand have an effect on the peripheral accuracy of the contact lens, so that at a wavelength at which the photoinitiator has a very high absorption coefficient, the critical amount of radiated light in respect of peripheral inaccuracies of the lens can be reached very rapidly, while at a wavelength at which the photoinitiator has a low absorption coefficient, this is correspondingly less time-critical. In addition, the polymerisation/crosslinking at a lower absorption of the photoinitiator is more uniform through the thickness of the contact lens material (starting material), because at low absorption only part of the radiated light is always absorbed in the uppermost “layer” of the contact lens material and thus sufficient light can always still reach the lower “layers” of the contact lens material and be absorbed there by the photoinitiator. Because of the uniform polymerisation/crosslinking of the contact lens material (starting material) effected in this way, stress in the contact lens can be avoided.
In a variant of the process according to the invention, a light source is used, in which the low-pass filter is structurally integrated. This variant is simple in construction and ensures that light of a wavelength below the threshold wavelength of the low-pass filter is constantly blocked, both when impinging on the filter and when impinging on the contact lens material containing the photoinitiator. In another variant of the process according to the invention, the low-pass filter is formed by optical components, e.g. lenses, which are made of a suitable material. These optical components are typically not a part of the light source.
In a further variant of the process according to the invention, a narrow-band filter with a plurality of individual filter elements is used. This simplifies the construction of the narrow-band filter, since various transmission characteristics of individual filter elements can be quasi superimposed and it is therefore simpler to attain the desired transmission of the filter.
As already mentioned initially, the process is especially advantageous if measurement of intensity of light of the prescribed wavelength, at which the photoinitiator absorbs, takes place during production of the mouldings, especially the contact lenses. In this way, it is possible during the production process to have on-line monitoring of the relevant amount of light, namely the amount of light of the wavelength at which the photoinitiator has its spectral absorption.
Furthermore, according to the invention, an apparatus is proposed for the production of mouldings, especially ophthalmic lenses, e.g. contact lenses, in which a broadband photo-receiver is provided to measure the intensity of light. A filter is arranged in front of this broadband photoreceiver, the transmission of which is designed such that the light passing through the filter and impinging on the photoreceiver corresponds in its intensity to the light absorbed by the photoinitiator on the basis of its spectral absorption at the wavelength from the predetermined wavelength range. The advantages of the relevant embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention correspond to the advantages mentioned in the corresponding process variants.
Thus, in an embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, the device for exposing to light the starting material containing a photoinitiator in the mould, which absorbs in the UV range, comprises a UV light source.
In a further embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, a low-pass filter is provided for a photoinitiator having an absorption in the UV-B range, this filter being designed and arranged such that only light of a wavelength above the threshold wavelength of the low-pass filter impinges the filter arranged in front of the photoreceiver or the photoinitiator in the starting material, respectively. The filter arranged in front of the photoreceiver is formed as a narrow-band filter with a transmission above the threshold wavelength of the low-pass filter. The advantages of this embodiment in respect of the simpler construction of the filter and the robustness of the process in the event that the light source emits light of a wavelength at which the photoinitiator does indeed absorb light but has only a low absorption coefficient, have already been explained in the corresponding process variant.
In a further embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, the device for exposing the starting material to light can comprise a source of light in which the low-pass filter is structurally integrated. In another embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, optical components such as lenses may be provided as low-pass filters, and these are made of a suitable material. The corresponding advantages of these embodiments have likewise already been explained in the corresponding process variant.
This applies in the same way to an embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, in which the narrow-band filter comprises a plurality of individual filter elements.
Finally, in a further embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, the device for measuring the intensity of light is designed and arranged such that the measurement of intensity takes place during the production of the mouldings.
Further advantageous aspects of the process according to the invention or of the apparatus according to the invention may be seen from the following explanation of embodiments of the invention with the aid of the drawings. These show:
The following explanation relates to an embodiment of a process for the production of contact lenses. The process according to the invention is especially suitable for the production of contact lenses, but should not be restricted to the production of contact lenses, nor to the cyclical clock-cycled process which is explained in more detail in the following by way of example.
As already mentioned,
In the following step S2, the moulding tool 1 is closed, whereby closure is effected first of all by a pivoting movement of the mould half 11 about the axis 12, as indicated by the arrow 13 in
The male mould halves 110 and relevant parts thereof are transparent to UV light. In a third step S3, the starting material (prepolymer) located in the cavity—that is, in the space between the male mould half 110 and the female mould half 100 is exposed to UV light, which results in polymerisation and/or crosslinking of the starting material. In a fourth step S4, the same procedure is repeated. The main reason for choosing two exposure steps S3 and S4 or exposing stations is that the cycle time of the cyclical clock-cycled process can be shortened. This is because, in principle, the slowest step determines the cycle time. On the other hand, it is necessary to expose the starting material to UV light of a specific intensity for a specific time period, in order to ensure adequate polymerisation and/or crosslinking of the starting material.
In a subsequent step S5, while the moulding tool 1 is still closed, a first inspection of the contact lenses still in the mounds is carried out. In this step S5, for example, the central area of the contact lenses can be examined for inclusions or other relatively coarse, easily perceptible defects.
In the following step S6, the moulding tool 1 is opened again, which takes place in reverse order of the closing process for the moulding tool described, in step S2.
In the next step S7, the male and female mould halves 110, 100 are sprayed e.g. with water, in order to effect detachment of the contact lenses and on the other hand to wash away excess uncrosslinked prepolymer from the contact lens and/or the mould half.
In the next step S8, the contact lenses are automatically transferred from the male mould half 110 to the female mould half 100. In many cases, when the moulding tool 1 is opened, the contact lens has remained in the female mound half 100, but in the majority of cases it remains adhering to the male mould half 110. Since, however, for the automated steps which follow, it must be ensured that the contact lens is in the female mould half 100, in step S8 the contact lenses are automatically transferred from the male to the female mould half. For those cases in which the contact lens is already in the female mould half, the transfer is attempted, but since in this instance the contact lens is already located in the female mould half, no transfer takes place. After step S8, it is ensured in any event that the contact lenses are located in the female mould half.
In step S9, the female mould halves 100 are moistened, for example with water, which simplifies centring of the contact lens in the female mould half 100, because in this way the contact lens can slide more easily into the centre of the female mould half 100. Centring of the lens is in turn important for the next step S10, because in this step the contact lens is grasped from the female mould half.
While the grasped contact lenses are inspected in a cyclical (secondary-) process in a step S11 after having been grasped in step S10, in particular to check whether the contact lens edge is satisfactory, the unsatisfactory contact lenses are discarded in a step S12. The satisfactory contact lenses, on the other hand, are placed in a package in step S13, which may optionally contain a preserving solution (e.g. saline).
After the contact lenses in step S10 have been removed from the female mould halves 100, the moulding tool 1 and the mould halves 100 and 110 arranged in the tool halves 10 and 11 can be rinsed e.g. with water in the cyclical (main) process in a step S14, and subsequently the cyclical (main) process can begin a new cycle again with step S1, the dispensing of prepolymer into the female mould halves 100.
In
Also visible in
How the intensity and therefore the amount of light are basically measured is described more fully, for example, in EP-A-1,314,527, and there is therefore no need for further explanation here.
The light-sensitive sensors 51 discussed already in
The sensor housing 514 has an inwardly protruding rotary projection 5140, against which a stop face 5110 of the sensor circuit board 511 rests in the assembled state (
In addition, the sensor contains a filter housing 515, in which the filter pack 510 is located. The filter pack 510 is located in an aperture 5150, which is sealed up from the top by a glass lid 5151. The filter housing 515 likewise has an internal thread. A filter clamping ring 5152 is screwed into this internal thread, and from the bottom fixes the filter pack 510 at the desired location. The filter housing 515 pre-assembled with the fixed filter pack is then screwed onto the external thread on the cylindrical extension 5141 of the sensor housing 514.
A sleeve 517 is placed on a cylindrical extension 5153 of the filter housing 515, and is identical to the sleeve which accommodates e.g. the male mould half when producing the contact lenses, and through which to the contact lens material is then exposed to light.
The described embodiment of the sensor 51 is—as already mentioned—only one embodiment of how a sensor can be designed. It is also conceivable to use a corresponding sensor, as disclosed for example with the aid of
Photoinitiators as used, for example, together with the described prepolymers, and as described, for example, in EP-A-0 790 258, still absorb significantly in the range above 300 nm, even if the absorption maximum lies considerably below 300 nm. The sensor circuit board 511, which here serves as the photoreceiver, has broadband sensitivity, i.e. it is sensitive at least over the wavelength range of ultraviolet light and frequently also over the wavelength range of visible light. However, the sensor should reproduce as precisely as possible the behaviour of the photoinitiator, which only absorbs at a specific wavelength in the long-wave UV range.
For this reason, the filter pack 510 functioning as the filter preferably consists of a plurality of filter elements, which have varying transmission in different wavelength ranges. By superimposing the transmission characteristics of the individual filter elements, the desired narrow-band filter can be obtained. The filter—here the filter pack 510—can thus comprise a total of three filter elements, in order to obtain as precisely as possible a reproduction of how the photoinitiator “sees” the light to which it is exposed in the prepolymer (starting material).
One example of transmission curves of the individual filter elements can be seen from
The superimposing of these transmission curves together with the “absorption curve” ([1-T]-curve, T=transmission) of the photoinitiator can be seen from
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04022048.5 | Sep 2004 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2005/009933 | 9/15/2005 | WO | 00 | 5/18/2007 |