The present invention refers to a process and an apparatus for the transformation of yarns and to a yarn thus produced.
In particular, the invention refers to a process and an apparatus for changing the so-called “touch” and/or the structure of the yarn. One of the applications of the invention is to give the yarn an old or aged effect; however, further possible applications of the invention are not to be excluded.
It is known to execute finishing or upgrading treatments to clothing or other textile articles for obtaining said old or aged effect.
Among the main objects of the invention is that of giving the yarns of either vegetable or animal origin, as well as of artificial or synthetic nature, an aspect different from that exhibited beforehand, by means of deformations which affect the touch and/or the structure of the yarn.
This result has been achieved, according to the invention, by devising a process, an apparatus and a yarn having the characteristics described in the independent claims. Further characteristics being set forth in the dependent claims.
Among the advantages of the present invention, one is that it is possible to make yarns having special effects, by giving them an old appearances or the like, these effects being reproducible along the whole length of the yarn; that it is possible to treat yarns of different, such as animal, vegetable and artificial or synthetic, origin; that the process requires relatively moderated times; that it is possible to alter the characteristics of the effects being given, that is, to modify the intensity and frequency of such effects along the thread development; the yarns thus treated maintain their qualitative characteristics, that is, they do not undergo damages affecting their quality or mechanical resistance; that the apparatus in question keeps its characteristics unchanged even alter prolonged periods of use; that it is possible to reduce the production cost of the articles thus obtained by using yarns according to the invention, thereby avoiding or reducing the commonly performed finish or upgrading treatments.
These and other advantages and characteristics of the invention will be best understood by anyone skilled in the art from a reading of the following description in conjunction with the attached drawings given as a practical exemplification of the invention, but not to be considered in a limitative sense, wherein:
In general, a process according to the invention is a process for the mechanical transformation of yarns of vegetable, animal or artificial or synthetic origins, which provides for abrading the thread when the latter is supported in the air between two supports.
Advantageously, the thread may be fed continuously between the supports so as to carry out the abrasion throughout its development.
The yarn according to the invention have thread's portions, along its longitudinal development, which are subjected to a mechanical abrasive actions while it is suspended in the air between two supports.
With reference to the figures of the accompanying drawings, numeral 1 in
The apparatus 1 shown in
The two cylinders 55 and 56 are spaced apart by such an extension as to allow the interposition of an abrasive means 6 which, in the example, is represented by a brush. In particular, in the represented example, the thread F is subjected to the action of two brushes 6. The brushes operate on lengths suspended in the air, that is, without any supporting surface for the thread. The bristles of the brushes 6 do not operate with their free ends on the thread but with their relevant sides, and the same thread travels between the bristles of the brushes in order to be abraded.
At least one of the two cylinders 55, 56 is slotted to prevent the turns of the thread from becoming entangled and also to induce a revolution of the thread, so as to put all the thread's surface in contact with the brush. More driving-out units like the third cylinder 57, and thus more brushes, can be used according to the effect to be given to the fibre in the course of formation. For example, with very resistant and tough threads or fibres, such as those of the cotton, the abrasive action must result far more vigorous than with less resistant fibres like those of wool.
In
In
In the example shown in
For example, the bristles 61 of brushes 6 may be made from abrasive nylon produced by-the Dupont Co.
The brush's bristles may be disposed uniformly, as in the examples of FIGS. 1—3, or discontinuously as in the example of
In place of, or in association with the brushes, other abrasive means may be used, such as those of the type illustrated in
Advantageously, the surface speed of brushes 6 (or of cylinders 6′) is higher than the feed speed of the thread under treatment.
As best visible in
With different orientations of the brushes, as well as by means of a more or less interaction, it is possible to obtain different effects of abrasion on the thread. The change in the orientation can be automated and/or suitably timed to favour a constant wear of the bristles of brushes 6. Data relating to the orientation of the brushes may also be stored and used by the computer above described.
The brushes 6, and the cylinders 6′ as well, can be made to act on the thread with random frequency so as to give it non-repetitive, bright/dull effects. The operation of the abrasive means can be controlled by a software program with an algorithm generating random periods of interventions and relevant lengths thereof.
Shown in
The means for driving, controlling and checking the elements above described and illustrated in the accompanying drawings are of a type known to those skilled in the art and have not therefore been described in greater detail, for the sake of simplicity. The construction details may vary in any equivalent way as far as the shape, dimensions, elements disposition, nature of the used materials are concerned, without nevertheless departing from the scope of the adopted solution idea and, thereby, remaining within the limits of the protection granted to the present patent.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
FI2003A0116 | Apr 2003 | IT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
162440 | Webber, Jr. | Apr 1875 | A |
1957508 | Taylor | May 1934 | A |
2241206 | Koster | May 1941 | A |
2244333 | Hanse | Jun 1941 | A |
2273752 | Frey | Feb 1942 | A |
2278879 | Hunter | Apr 1942 | A |
3140526 | Tlamicha | Jul 1964 | A |
3431716 | Mertens | Mar 1969 | A |
3831360 | Horvath | Aug 1974 | A |
3949041 | Schwarz | Apr 1976 | A |
5034250 | Guertin | Jul 1991 | A |
5035110 | Nelson | Jul 1991 | A |
5081753 | Fink et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5110517 | Lukhard et al. | May 1992 | A |
5392499 | Bertoldo | Feb 1995 | A |
5755086 | Halbheer et al. | May 1998 | A |
5802832 | Foster | Sep 1998 | A |
5956828 | Chiou et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6269525 | Dischler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
20040107553 | Goineau et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040216278 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |