The invention relates in general to avoiding register errors in the process and control of a printing mechanism.
In the printing industry, various processes are used to avoid and correct compass and register errors. Compass or register errors occur when an image is imprinted at an incorrect location on a printing image carrying element or on a printing medium. The term “in compass” or “in register” identifies a condition in which the printed image is imprinted at the correct location on a printing medium, i.e., the image is imprinted at the proper level or in the proper position. In multi-color printing, the term “compass” is standardly used, while in mono-color printing, the term “register” is used. To avoid compass and/or register errors, register marks or marks that are imprinted on a carrying element of the printing machine or on the printing medium, are often used in order to check the printing medium's register or compass; i.e., whether the compass or register is free of error. In the foregoing, the term “mark” will be used exclusively to describe both terms (compass and register).
The carrying element is often the conveyor belt that carries the printing medium or, in the case of electrophotographic printing, the master cylinder that carries the printed image. Marks come in various shapes, sizes, and colors. Outside of the printing machine, marks are manually measured by an operator with the aid of a magnifying lens and measuring mechanisms. Inside the printing machine marks are automatically measured with the aid of sensors, whereby any shifting of the printed image will be identified. Identification of a compass and/or register error is accomplished either before imprintation, as a means of calibrating the printing machine, or during the imprintation, i.e., on the fly.
The quality of the correct positioning of the compass and/or register is a significant factor for the quality of the printing result. With increasingly higher demands for quality printing and for proper positioning of the imprinted image, attempts are made to adjust the register with even greater precision.
In view of the above, this invention is directed to ensuring proper compass and register positioning during printing. The invention avoids compass and register errors in a printing machine, whereby marks are imprinted on a carrying element and at least one sensor detects the marks on the carrying element and a second sensor detects a seam on the carrying element. Beneficially, the sensor values read by the first sensor in the area of the seam that is detected by the second sensor are discarded in a control mechanism. Sensor values that are influenced by the seam lead to false corrections and their use is avoided by discarding them.
In one embodiment of the invention, the area in which the sensor values of the first sensor are discarded is 18.5 mm long upstream of the seam and 18.5 mm long downstream of the seam in relation to the carrying element's direction of conveyance compass and register errors are specifically avoided when the area in which sensor values of the first sensor are discarded is 12.8 mm long upstream from the seam and 12.8 mm long downstream from the seam in relation to the carrying element's direction of conveyance. The listed areas are specified for the particular purpose of avoiding compass and register errors.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the sensor values read by the first sensor are examined in the control mechanism and as a result of this examination, those sensor values read by the first sensor, that come from detection of the seam by the first sensor are discarded. Therefore, the necessity for a second sensor for detecting the seam is removed.
The invention, and its objects and advantages, will become more apparent in the detailed description of the preferred embodiment presented below.
In the detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention presented below, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring now to the accompanying drawings,
As shown in
A second sensor 7 is located upstream of the four print modules, above the carrying element 1, while a first sensor 8 is located above the carrying element 1, downstream of the print modules. Provision can be made for additional sensors. For the present embodiment, a calibration run is run for an electrophotographic printing machine before printing orders or jobs are executed. During calibration, marks 12 (see
The first sensor 8, downstream of the print modules, is activated by the second sensor 7, upstream of the print modules after a certain number of clock pulses from the angle of rotation of the sensor/transmitter 10. Using the marks 12, a determination is made concerning how close to compass and/or register the individual colors are being imprinted. Deviations from the desired compass and/or register (i.e., from the imprintation of the marks 12 in the correct places) are measured, and subsequent corrections to the deviations are made in various ways. During the calibration run of the printing machine, the second sensor 7 sends out a signal that simulates the leading edge of a sheet of paper to a control mechanism 15 (see FIG. 5).
In order to generate a signal to simulate the leading edge of a sheet of paper, provision can alternatively be made for an additional sensor (not shown). This simulated point serves as a reference point for the marks 12, and each mark 12 is evaluated in reference to the signal from the second sensor 7. From this evaluation, corrective parameters are derived that are then used to set various parameters of the printing machine. Overall, it is desirable that the corrective parameters be identified as accurately as possible, that the compass and register be error free, and that measurement errors be avoided.
In
At each eleventh pattern 13 of mark 12, however, the compass and/or register errors spread out and assume substantially higher values, mainly between −700 micrometers and −1400 micrometers. This can be explained as follows: The first sensor 8 detects eleven patterns 13 of marks 12 for each rotation of the carrying element 1; after eleven measurements of patterns 13 by the first sensor 8, the carrying element has made one rotation around the rollers 9 and is back to its starting position. During the course of each rotation, however, the first sensor 8 also detects the seam 11, at which the two ends of the carrying element are welded together. The measuring signal for the patterns 13 of marks 12 at this seam 11 are obviously severely inaccurate such that the compass and/or register errors for this area at the seam 11 are unusable. The seam 11 is recognized by the first sensor either mistakenly as marks 12, or the measurement of marks 12 are so inaccurate because of the seam 11, that the impression of a large compass and/or register error incorrectly arises, i.e., an error that does not actually exist, as shown in FIG. 2. When the measured and displayed compass and/or register errors are accepted without being examined, large measurement errors are obtained that lead to incorrect provisions during the calibration, and ultimately to compass and/or register errors during subsequent printing operations. The above-described inaccurate measurements cannot be completely removed with the use of software in a control mechanism 15 (see
Provisions can also be made for the use of additional correction parameters for the correction of compass and/or register errors, such as a change in the speed of travel of the carrying element 1, or the imaging cylinder 3 and the intermediate cylinder 6. Using the aforementioned measures, adjustments can be made to the points at which during calibration the image is imprinted onto the carrying element 1 and during the printing process onto the printing medium. The individual colors are shown through various geometrical symbols, the color yellow by rhombuses, the color magenta by triangles, and the color cyan by squares.
The x-axis shows approximately one hundred-fifty patterns 13 with marks 12. It is clear that the positions of the compasses and/or the registers for the color yellow, varies across a range of approximately 2000 μm. The positions for the color magenta vary across a range of approximately 2200 μm, and for the color cyan vary across a range of approximately 2300 μm.
The fact that in the range of numbers from sixty to eighty-five the correction values of the patterns 13 deviate significantly from the remaining correction values is noteworthy. These inaccurate values arise from the fact that a computing mechanism 16 (see
Inaccurate correction values during calibration should usually be viewed more critically than correction values of individual faulty measurements arising during a printing job, because the correction values arising during calibration are usually used over a longer period of time and thus cause more damage with respect to compass and/or register errors.
The first sensor 8 is connected to the computing mechanism 16. Mounted upstream of the print modules is a second sensor 7 that detects the seam and that is connected to the computing mechanism 16. Provision is also made for an angle of rotation sensor/transmitter 10 or web encoder, which is attached to a roller 9 (see
For each rotation of the carrying element 1, the angle of rotation sensor/transmitter 10 emits 62500 pulses, which are counted. When the second sensor 7 detects the seam, the continuously increasing count on the angle of rotation sensor/transmitter 10 is read and stored. When at a certain point in time, the point at which the seam 11 is located is reported, the actual count of the angle of rotation sensor/transmitter 10 is read and from this, the count that was stored the last time the seam was detected is subtracted. The difference derived therefrom, a number of impulses, is simply converted into a unit of length whereby the distance between the seam 11 and the second sensor 7 is ascertained.
The printing of each mark 12, onto the carrying element 1, is triggered by an electronically generated pulse from the second sensor 7. In the course of the calibration process, the pulse mimics the leading edge of a sheet of paper during a printing operation, i.e., the leading edge is simulated. During the printing process the marks 12 are ideally imprinted onto the sheet of paper at a particular, known distance from the leading edge of the sheet of paper. When the pulse from the second sensor 7 is transmitted to the computing mechanism 16, for each print mechanism 4 that is used for imaging the imaging cylinder 3, clock pulses are counted off, in accordance with which the imaging cylinder 3 receives information. Therefore, the marks 12 are essentially imprinted at a known distance from the leading edge of the sheet of paper. In the course of the present calibration, the marks 12 are imprinted at the desired places on the carrying element 1. The first sensor 8 detects the marks 12 downstream from the print modules and transmits a pulse for each mark to the computing mechanism 16, in which set values are stored that identify the points in time at which the marks 12 are detected by sensor 8 when no compass and/or register errors exist. The set values are compared with the actual values measured by the sensor 8, whereby a compass and/or register error is identified for each color corresponding to each mark 12. This is the deviation of the actual value from the set value in the form of a unit of time that characterizes the distance of a mark 12 between an error-free position and an incorrect position of such a mark 12. In this case, it is a deviation in the direction of travel.
As described above and depicted in
By detecting the seam 11 with the second sensor 7 working together with the angle of rotation sensor/transmitter 10, which ascertains the position of the carrying element 1 by counting off pulses, the position of the seam 11 on the carrying element 1 becomes known. If the seam is in a certain area around a detection point of the first sensor 8 where the first sensor 8 detects the marks 12, then the sensor values of the first sensor 8, transmitted to the computing mechanism 16 upon detection of the marks 12, are not used for calculating a compass and/or register error. Rather, these sensor values are discarded.
The area in which the sensor values of the first sensor 8 are discarded is defined in
The distance between the seam 11 and the second sensor 7 can be calculated in the computing mechanism 16 from a sensor signal generated when the second sensor 7 detects the seam 11 and from the knowledge of the number of clock pulses per unit of length coming from the angle of rotation sensor/transmitters 10. This distance is calculated from the number of clock pulses counted by the angle of rotation sensor/transmitter 10 since the last detection of the seam 11. When the distance between the seam 11 and the second sensor 7 is smaller than the distance between the first sensor 8 and the second sensor 7, the seam 11 is moving toward the first sensor 7. In such a case it is possible that an inaccurate measurement will result.
In an alternative to the above embodiment, only those sensor values coming from the second sensor 7 are discarded, which come from the detection of the seam 11. In this case, not all of the sensor values that are located within the distance d, are discarded. This case assumes that the first sensor 8 and the control mechanism downstream from the print modules are capable of distinguishing between the seam 11 and the marks 12. In the prescribed manner, spread values based upon the seam 11 are discarded, the correction parameters for adjusting the printing machine parameters during the calibration run are significantly improved, and ultimately, the compass and/or register errors during the printing process are more successfully avoided.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variation and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 18 997 | Apr 2003 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5101232 | Evans et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
6336019 | Castelli et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
20040009019 | Hosokawa | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11288198 | Oct 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040226470 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |