Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6302764
-
Patent Number
6,302,764
-
Date Filed
Tuesday, January 4, 200025 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, October 16, 200123 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
- Sughrue, Mion, Zinn, Macpeak & Seas, PLLC
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 451 56
- 451 443
- 451 5
- 451 9
- 451 10
- 451 11
- 451 47
- 451 147
- 451 213
- 451 219
- 451 253
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
In a first step, the grinding worm profile is dressed according to the requirements of the workpiece that is to be machined. In a second step, the thereby shaped grinding worm, which has been slightly deformed by the effects of the centrifugal force, is measured at operating speed. In a third step, the measured values are converted into control data for a correcting, redressing process of the grinding worm flanks. Finally in a fourth step, the grinding worm flanks are redressed in such a manner that form errors, which are caused by various influences during grinding, are used as correction factors in the machining of the worm profile. The measuring of the grinding worm flanks may be performed directly without contact by means of a distance sensor or indirectly, whereby a sample toothed wheel is ground and this wheel is then measured by means of a tooth-flank measuring machine. The described process makes possible a highly precise tooth-flank grinding process at high grinding worm speed and thereby cost-effective machining is achieved.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The continuous generating grinding method of gear teeth has been shown to be a good finishing process also in mass production because of its high efficiency and outstanding constant precision of ground workpieces. In most cases, grinding tools were used in the past that were at the outer circumference gear-worm shaped corundum wheels—the so-called grinding worms—which rarely turned faster than at a speed of approximately 40 m/s at their circumference.
The already very high efficiency of the process may be increased even more if the circumferencial speed of the grinding tool is increased further. The problem thereby is the fact that the grinding worm is deformed by the effect of the centrifugal forces at high speed. Thereby the deformation is not only caused by the complicated stress condition, as it exists in case of a rotating disk, but also by the worm profile, which has at each angle position around the rotational axis a different axial position, whereby an uneven distribution of force is applied to the worm body circumference. Furthermore, the non-homogeneity of the specific gravity and of the modulus of elasticity of the grinding wheel body are also responsible that the grinding worm shape is deformed with increasing speed. A grinding worm rotating at high speed is therefore not only larger in its diameter than the one that is not moving, but it is generally also not round, and the once established worm profile takes on a shape that cannot be predicted in advance. This is however basically true for tools of all grinding machines, only this phenomenon is not a hindrance in cases where the active form of the grinding disk is shaped at a working speed, which means, where the deformations effected by the centrifugal force are eliminated by the dressing process to a certain degree.
Unfortunately, grinding worms are, for obvious reasons, much more difficult to be shaped than grinding disks. In the rule it is therefore necessary to conduct the dressing process at very low speed. Therefor there are a number of processes known wherein the most efficient and currently most widely known process the one with two profiling disks: each profiling disk layered with diamond grains dresses thereby one worm flank in a process, which is similar to the thread cutting process on a lathe. In another more universal method, grinding worm flanks are dressed by making contact at specific points along a line by means of a rotating dressing tool that has a layer of diamond grains at its active outer circumference. This process is performed in such a manner that line after line are placed very close to one another until the entire active flank surface is dressed. This method is however slower than the one mentioned above but it allows—within certain limits—the creation of an arbitrary topology on the worm flanks. For grinding worms shaped in this manner, there is determined in advance a specific assignment of each point of the tooth flanks to be ground to a specific point on the worm flank whereby, during subsequent grinding it must be ensured by relative motion between the tool and workpiece that the respective points are actually touched or are a common meshing point or machining point. Through this method it is possible to manufacture topologically corrected gear teeth by a continuous generating grinding process.
DE-PS 196 19 401 C1 discloses a process by which grinding worms may also be topologically dressed at top grinding speeds. However, this process places high demands on the mechanical device and on the quality of the necessary servo-drives and control systems, which leads in any case to high investment costs. In addition, dressing tools used in this process can only be used for one specific modulus pitch on the grinding worm.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is the object of the present invention to disclose a process and a device wherein grinding worms that are operated at high to very high speeds may be dressed (trued) in a known and tested dressing process at low speeds and which have nevertheless the required precise profile geometry at operating speed, which means, at a stressed condition under centrifugal force.
According to the invention, the process comprises the following steps performed sequentially:
1. Dressing of a grinding worm according to a known method in respect to the shape of the tooth flanks of the gear teeth that are to be ground.
2. Measuring the entire grinding worm profile with the grinding worm turning at operating speeds. This measuring may be performed, for example, directly by means of a non-contact measuring system, as by laser optical distance scanning or the like, or it may be performed indirectly by grinding and measuring of a sample (specimen) workpiece. The results of this measuring are in any case a table or a set of data, which contain precise coordinates of surface points that are distributed across the worm flanks matrix-like with sufficient small distances between one another.
3. Conversion of measured data into control data for the dressing device for a correcting, redressing process of the grinding worm profile. This conversion must determine the specified geometry of the grinding worm flank in the first phase on the basis of the specified geometry of the workpiece teeth; whereby in a second phase, the difference must be determined between the specified data of the worm flanks and the measured actual values; and in a third phase, corrected control data must be determined by using the differential values for the necessary movement of the dressing device.
4. The redressing of the grinding worm profile with the newly computed data whereby the previously determined form error is in a way used as a correction factor in dressing the grinding worm so that the grinding worm obtains the desired shape at operating speed.
The measuring of the worm grinding profile at operating speed is of great importance during this process. Should it be measured directly as mentioned above, as it may be performed by laser optical means, for example, then the measuring process may be completed relatively quickly and the data is readily available for further machining. There is a certain difficulty in the relative rough grinding worm flank surface, which requires careful filtering of the measured values when using sensitively reacting measuring devices.
The more costly measuring method is the indirect measuring with a sample workpiece. Thereby a suitable, sufficiently wide sample toothed wheel must be ground in the continuous shift-grinding process, which corresponds to the workpiece relative to the modulus, number of teeth, meshing and pitch angle, and precisely so that the entire grinding worm profile is reproduced on the complete gear teeth width of the sample wheel. This is accomplished if during grinding the entire possible shifting path of the grinding worm is simultaneously run off on the gear teeth width of the sample wheel. Naturally, the specified operating speed of the grinding tool must thereby be maintained.
Tooth flanks of the sample wheel, which are ground in such a manner, contain now in the transformed shape the actual geometry of the grinding worm profile, which means, all form deviations of the tool caused by the centrifugal force, which as mentioned above cannot be predicted, are reproduced on these sample gear teeth. From there, the actual geometry may be taken by any tooth-flank measuring machine.
Even though the second method is more costly than the direct measuring method of the worm profile, it has the great advantage that taken into consideration are not only the geometric distortions of the grinding worm caused by the centrifugal forces, or out-of-round conditions, profile distortions, changes in pitch etc, but also the deviations on the ground tooth flank surface, which are based on the technological influences such as meshing shocks, co-grinding of the tooth root, influence of the cooling lubricant, or even machine errors. In other words, the second method causes the total of all errors during the grinding process and makes possible, according to the described method, the corresponding compensation and elimination of undesired deviations. Thereby, gear teeth may be finished very efficiently and with high precision with a high-speed grinding worm even though the grinding worm was dressed at low speeds.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the following there are described two embodiments of the innovative device to perform the above-mentioned process with reference to the drawings, wherein
FIG.
1
and
FIG. 2
show embodiments for the direct and indirect measuring of the grinding worm, respectively.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1
shows a dressing device to dress a grinding worm
11
. The dressing device may be designed, for example, according to DE-OS 197 06 867.7. It comprises a cross slide, wherein the first slide
12
may be moved along a guide
13
of a machine base
14
perpendicular to the axis
15
of the grinding spindle
16
. The grinding worm
11
is clamped to the spindle
16
, which is driven by a motor
17
and is connected to an angle sensor
18
. A second slide
20
is movably positioned on top of slide
12
along a guide
19
which is parallel o the axis
15
. The sliding movement of each slide
12
,
20
is performed by a motor
21
,
22
, which has a stroke sensor
23
,
24
. A dressing motor
25
is mounted on slide
20
, whereby said motor drives the dressing spindle
26
onto which the dressing disk
27
is clamped. The dressing spindle
26
may be swiveled around an axis
26
which is perpendicular to the direction of guide
13
,
19
(see DE-OS 197 06 867.7).
A measuring device
35
for non-contact measuring of both flanks
36
of the grinding worm
11
at full grinding speed is additionally mounted on the slide
20
. The device
35
may include, for example, a pulsed laser
37
and a phototransistor
38
with corresponding optics. These two elements
37
,
38
of the light-optical, highly precise measuring device
35
are shown in
FIG. 1
as they are positioned next to one another. However, the optic may be designed in such a manner that the transmitting impulse is coaxial to the receiving impulse, for example, via a semi-transparent mirror. All servomotors
17
,
21
,
22
, stroke sensors and angle sensors
18
,
23
,
24
, as well as the motor
25
and the measuring device
35
are connected to a control device
39
. The functioning of these dressing devices and measuring devices
10
,
35
were described above with the aid of processing steps.
Deviating from the illustration according to
FIG. 1
, for relative motion between the grinding worm
11
and the dressing disk
27
, the grinding spindle
16
may be rigidly mounted on the cross slide but instead the dressing spindle
26
may also be rigidly mounted there for this motion. This version has above all an advantage if the grinding worm
11
is moved parallel and perpendicular to axis
15
during grinding of the workpiece. In this case, the same NC-axes of the machine may be used for grinding as well as for dressing, as it is described in DE-OS 196 25 370.5.
FIG. 2
shows a version for indirect measuring of the grinding worm
11
. In this version, a sample toothed wheel
45
is at first ground with the grinding worm
11
at full grinding speed. The sample wheel
45
is preferably wider than the workpieces to be finally ground with the worm
11
, and said wheel is ground differently than said workpieces. During grinding of the workpiece, a section of the width
46
of the grinding worm
11
is used for rough-grinding, another section is used for fine-grinding of a number of workpieces, and a third section is used for fine-grinding of yet another number of workpieces. In case of the sample wheel
45
, there is, in contrast, a continuous shifting motion performed during grinding parallel to the grinding spindle axis
15
and across the entire width
46
of the worm
11
, and at the same time the sample wheel is moved along its axis relative to the grinding worm
11
in such a manner that the entire width of the sample wheel
45
is machined. Thereby, each point of the grinding worm flank
36
has an exactly matching point on the tooth flank
47
of the sample wheel
45
. The measuring device
48
for measuring the sample wheel
45
is generally known. For example, suitable for this measuring is the easily obtainable tooth-flank measuring machine with the designation ZP
250
, manufactured by the Höfler Company (Firma Höfler). In the illustrated measuring device
48
shown in
FIG. 2
, the sample wheel is clamped down onto the measuring spindle
49
, which may be rotated around the measuring spindle axis
52
by means of a servomotor
50
, which has an angle sensor
51
. The measuring device
48
may include a measuring tracer
53
with a tracer pin
54
, which traces all flanks
47
point by point. The tracer
53
is mounted on a slide
55
, which is movable within a guide
56
parallel to axis
52
. The slide
55
is moved by a servomotor
57
, which has a stroke sensor
58
. The motors
50
,
57
, angle sensor
51
and stroke sensor
58
, and the tracer
53
are also connected to the control device
39
.
Claims
- 1. A process for dressing a grinding worm for grinding a work piece, comprising:dressing a grinding worm having at least two flanks into a profile required for the manufacture of a work piece rotating said grinding worm at an operating speed, at which said grinding worm will be operated during the manufacture of said work piece; measuring said dimensions of said grinding worm while said grinding worm is rotated at said operating speed; converting said measured dimensions of said grinding worm into control data, wherein said control data provides corrections for said at least two flanks on said grinding worm; and redressing said grinding worm in accordance with said control data.
- 2. A process according to claim 1, wherein during said dressing step said profile is an uncorrected standard profile, which is different from the one needed for the workpiece that is to be ground.
- 3. A process according to claim 1, wherein measuring of the grinding worm is performed at said operating speed without contact by a distance sensor.
- 4. A process according to claim 1, wherein measuring of the grinding worm flanks is performed indirectly by means of a sample workpiece, whereby said sample workpiece is ground using a continuous shift-grinding method on said grinding worm, wherein said grinding worm is dressed according to said dressing step, such that an entire active grinding flank geometry is contained on tooth flanks of said sample workpiece; and wherein said sample workpiece is measured with a tooth-flank measuring machine.
- 5. A device for dressing a grinding worm for grinding, comprising:a rotable grinding spindle, which rotates around a first axis and onto which a grinding worm having a plurality of flanks is clamped, wherein said grinding spindle is connected to a first motor, said first motor having an angle sensor; a rotable dressing spindle which rotates around a second axis and is advanceable relative to said grinding spindle radially to the first axis, and moveable in a sliding motion parallel to said first axis, whereby a dressing disk may be clamped onto said rotable dressing spindle, wherein the rotable dressing spindle is driven by a second motor; a measuring device for measuring the dimensions of grinding worm at operational speed; and a control device for converting values measured with the measuring device into correction values for controlling relative motion between the grinding spindle and the dressing disk to correct at least two flanks of the grinding worm.
- 6. A device according to claim 5, wherein the measuring device comprises a slidable, non-contact distance sensor, which moves parallel to the first axis relative to the grinding spindle and whereby said distance sensor measures said grinding worm flanks across a full operating width of the grinding worm.
- 7. A device according to claim 6, wherein said distance sensor is a laser-optical sensor.
- 8. A device according to claim 6, wherein the distance sensor is mounted adjacent to the dressing disk.
- 9. A device according to claim 5, wherein the measuring device comprises a measurement unit for measuring a sample wheel ground by the grinding worm.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
199 01 338 |
Jan 1999 |
DE |
|
US Referenced Citations (3)
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number |
Date |
Country |
196 25 370 |
Apr 1997 |
DE |
196 19 401 |
Nov 1997 |
DE |
197 06 867 |
Aug 1998 |
DE |