The present invention relates generally to the field of hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells, and, more particularly, to a process and process line which allows for the formation of fracturing fluid at a central location.
Hydraulic fracturing, or fracing, is used to initiate/stimulate oil or gas production in low-permeability reservoirs. Hydraulic fracing has become particularly valuable in gas reservoirs wells and has been a key factor in unlocking the potential of unconventional gas plays, such as coal-bed methane, tight gas and shale gas reservoirs.
In hydraulic fracing, a fluid is injected into a well at such high pressures that the structure “cracks”, or fractures. Fracing is used both to open up fractures already present in the formation and to create new fractures. These fractures permit hydrocarbons and other fluids to flow more freely into or out of the well bore. Desirable properties of a hydraulic fracturing fluid may include high viscosity, low fluid loss, low friction during pumping into the well, stability under the conditions of use such as high temperature deep wells, and ease of removal from the fracture and well after the operation is completed.
Slick Water fracs have become more common, as they tend to be the least expensive of the fracture fluids. As part of the frac procedure, propping agents, or proppants, are often injected along with the fluid to “prop” open the new fractures and keep the cracks open when fracturing fluid is withdrawn. Hybrid fracs which are a combination of slick water and conventional frac technology are also becoming popular. A number of different proppants can be used such as sand grains, ceramics, sintered bauxite, glass or plastic beads, or other material. Thus, it is also important that the fracturing fluid be able to transport large amounts of proppant into the fracture.
Depending on the particular fracing operation, it may be necessary that the fluid be viscosified to help create the fracture in the reservoir and to carry the proppant into this fracture. In Hybrid fracs, crosslinkers could be added at the frac site, as the viscosity would be too high to pump through a pipeline. The high gel loading for non crosslinked Hybrid fracs would require that additional polymer be added at the frac site. Thus, water-based fracing fluids often include friction reducing polymers and/or viscosifiers such as polyacrylamides and polymethacrylamides, cross-linked polyacrylamides and cross-linked polymethacrylamides, polyacrylic acid and polymethacrylic acid, polyacrylates, polymers of N-substituted acrylamides, co-polymers of acrylamide with another ethylenically unsaturated monomer co-polymerizable therewith, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid, polyvinyl pyrollidones, guar, substituted guars, other biopolymers such as xanthan such as xanthan gum, welan gum and diutan gum, derivatized biopolymers such as carboxymethyl cellulose, and other mixtures of polymers. Other chemicals such as scale inhibitor to prevent scaling, oxygen scavengers, H2S scavengers, biocides, and the like, may also be added.
It was common practice in the industry at one time to batch mix fracturing fluids at the well site. This was very costly and dependent upon water being present or being transported to remote sites and the bags of polymer, chemicals, etc. being transported on site. Further, incomplete mixing of the polymer and water was also a problem. If the dispersion of the polymer is incomplete, clumps of partially hydrated polymer can form, which clumps are commonly referred to in the industry as “fisheyes”.
More recently, liquid polymers, such as DynaFrac™ HT fluids, are being brought to the well site. However, the price of the premixed polymer itself and the costs to transport these large totes of liquid polymer make this a very costly alternative.
The present invention addresses these problems and provides a more cost effective process for preparing hydraulic fracturing fluid.
In an aspect of the present invention, a process is provided for preparing a friction-reduced hydraulic fracturing fluid at a central location which can be readily transported to an oil or gas well in a formation at a well site, comprising:
In one embodiment, additional water is added to the pumps to further dilute the friction-reduced hydraulic fracturing fluid.
In one embodiment, additives such as surfactants, acid, biocides, oxygen scavengers, H2S scavengers, scale inhibitors and the like are added to the water or the sheared friction-reduced hydraulic fracturing fluid prior to pumping it to the remote well site.
In another embodiment, the friction-reduced hydraulic fracturing fluid is retained in a surge tank at the remote well site prior to pumping it down the gas well. In another embodiment, a blender is provided at the well site for mixing proppant such as sand with the friction-reduced hydraulic fracturing fluid.
In another aspect of the present invention, a process line is provided, comprising:
In one embodiment, the process line further comprises a blender located at the remote site and operably associated with the at least one pipeline for receiving the friction-reduced hydraulic fracturing fluid and mixing it with a portion of a proppant.
In another embodiment, the process line comprises at least two pumps for pumping the friction-reduced hydraulic fracturing fluid through the at least one pipeline. In this embodiment, one could optionally provide a static mixer between the at least two pumps. The addition of the static mixer is to ensure thorough mixing of the polymer and water to prevent the formation of fisheyes. Studies have also shown that fisheyes and/or “microgels” present in some polymer gelled carrier fluids will plug pore throats, causing formation damage.
In another aspect of the present invention, a mobile hydraulic fracturing fluid preparation unit for preparing hydraulic fracturing fluid at a well site is provided, comprising:
It is understood by those skilled in the art that a frac pump is a high-pressure, high-volume pump used in hydraulic fracturing treatments.
The shearing mixer can be any high-speed blender capable of rapidly dispersing (shearing) the polymer throughout the mix water.
Referring to the drawings wherein like reference numerals indicate similar parts throughout the several views, several aspects of the present invention are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in detail in the figures, wherein:
The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of one of the embodiments of the present invention and is not intended to represent the only embodiments contemplated by the inventors. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a comprehensive understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details.
The present invention, both as to its organization and manner of operation, may best be understood by reference to the following description and the drawings wherein numbers are used throughout several views to label like parts. Certain parts which are mentioned may be absent in particular figures due to the view of the drawing or obstruction by other parts.
An embodiment of a process line of the present invention is illustrated in
A larger polymer storage tank 12 is also provided at the water plant site, which storage tank is preferably large enough to hold about 20 metric tonnes of polymer or more. Polymers useful in the present embodiment include friction reducing polymers such as partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamides, polyacrylamides and polymethacrylamides, cross-linked polyacrylamides and cross-linked polymethacrylamides, polyacrylic acid and polymethacrylic acid, polyacrylates, polymers of N-substituted acrylamides, co-polymers of acrylamide with another ethylenically unsaturated monomer co-polymerizable therewith, 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid, polyvinyl pyrollidones, biopolymers such as xanthan, guars, derivitized guars, derivitized cellulose and other mixtures of polymers. Near the bottom of the polymer storage tank 12 is an auger or conveyer 14, which auger/conveyer 14 may be controlled by a control panel (not shown) at the water plant site 10.
The auger/conveyer 14 delivers an appropriate amount of polymer to high shear mixer 16. Water is also delivered to mixer 16 via pipe 22, which pipe 22 is connected to water filtering unit 20 via outlet pipe 21. The high shear mixer 16 can be any one of many high shear mixers known in the art which are capable of shearing a solid polymer with water. Useful high shear mixers generally comprise sharp blades or impellers, which blades or impellers are capable of rotating at very high speeds, for example, in excess of 40,000 rmp. An example of a high shear mixer useful in the present embodiment is an Urschel Laboratories Incorporated Comitrol® Processor Model 1700. It is understood, however, that other mixing vessels or mixing devices known in the art can also be used.
An embodiment of a high shear mixer useful in the present invention is shown in more detail in
Additional water may be added to the polymer/water mixture via pipe 24 while the polymer/water mixture is being pumped through pump 26 to form dilute hydraulic fracturing fluid having reduced friction. The ratio of polymer to water will be dependent upon the geophysical characteristics of a particular reservoir or formation. For example, in some instances, very little polymer will be added to the water, for example, when used for fracturing shale (low rate) wells. Sometimes, no polymer needs to be added at all. In this instance, valve 23 is shut off and instead only valve 25 is opened. In this instance, only pure water will be pumped to remote well site 30. Thus, in the present invention, the friction-reduced hydraulic fracturing fluid has a viscosity in the range of about 1 to about 15000 cP, more preferably about 1 to about 100 cp, and most preferably about 1 to about 20 cP. However, during a Hybrid frac some chemicals such as additional polymers and/or a cross linker are required to be added at the well site.
Additional chemicals can be added to the high shear mixture, for example, a scale inhibitor component to prevent scaling, oxygen scavengers, H2S scavengers, biocides, surfactants, caustic soda, antifoaming agents, iron chelators, and the like at pump 26. This can be added before or after the polymer. Once the polymer and water are sufficiently mixed, a “slippery” hydraulic fracturing fluid having reduced friction is formed. In one embodiment, an in-line static mixer is provided between pump 26 and another pump 28 to ensure that the polymer is completely hydrated. The reduced friction fracturing fluid can now be readily pumped through pipeline 29 to remote well site 30.
Remote well site 30 comprises a plurality of oil or gas wells 32 into which hydraulic fracturing fluid needs to be delivered. The hydraulic fracturing fluid can be stored for a period of time in surge tank 34 until fracturing operations begin. When fracturing operations begin, the fracturing fluid is optionally mixed with a proppant 36 such as sand grains, ceramics, sintered bauxite, glass or plastic beads, or other material, in a blender 38. The proppant blended hydraulic fracturing fluid can then be transported via piping 42 to a plurality of individual Hp pumps to the plurality of gas wells 32.
As previously mentioned, liquid polymer (hydraulic fracturing fluid) is normally transported directly to the remote well site. Thus, there are many expenses associated with transporting polymer and water to such remote sites. Further, addition of any other chemicals must also take place at the remote well site, hence, added to the costs are the costs associated with transporting these chemicals to these remote places. However, the embodiment of the invention as described above is much more cost effective, as the hydraulic fracturing fluid is made entirely at a central water plant site, which central site can then service a number of remote well sites simultaneously.
In another aspect of the present invention, an improved mobile hydraulic fracturing fluid unit is provided, which unit is designed to make hydraulic fracturing fluid directly at the well site without at least one of the previously discussed drawbacks, for example, the formation of fisheyes and the like. With reference now to
In the embodiment shown in
The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to those embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein, but is to be accorded the full scope consistent with the claims, wherein reference to an element in the singular, such as by use of the article “a” or “an” is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more”. All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various embodiments described throughout the disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are intended to be encompassed by the elements of the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims.
This is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/255,478, filed Oct. 21, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3619207 | Dzurik et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3710865 | Kiel | Jan 1973 | A |
3727689 | Clampitt | Apr 1973 | A |
3868328 | Boothe et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3938594 | Rhudy et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4137182 | Golinkin | Jan 1979 | A |
4622155 | Harris et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4624795 | Dawson et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
5002125 | Phillips et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5069283 | Mack | Dec 1991 | A |
5303998 | Whitlatch et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5404951 | Lai et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5711376 | Sydansk | Jan 1998 | A |
6039999 | Bakshi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6776235 | England | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6787506 | Blair et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6820694 | Willberg et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
20090281006 | Walters et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2592717 | Dec 2008 | CA |
Entry |
---|
Levitt, David and Pope, Gary. Selection and Screening of Polymers for Enhanced-Oil Recovery. SPE 113845. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. 2008, p. 1-18. |
“Which do you want? Conventional fracs? Water fracs? Both!” Pinnacle Technologies Inc. http://www.pinntech.com/pubs/CS/CS04—SP.pdf. |
Mayerhofer, M., et al. Proppants? We Don't Need No Proppants. SPE 38611. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 1997, p. 457-464. |
Palisch, T., et al. Slickwater Fracturing—Food for Thought. SPE 115766. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 2008, p. 1-20. |
Evaluation of Impacts to Underground Sources of Drinking Water by Hydraulic Fracturing of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs. Chapter 4 Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Jun. 2004, p. 4-1 to 4-26. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100132949 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12255478 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 12626845 | US |