The present invention pertains to delays (e.g. time delays). More particularly, the present invention relates to a Process Compensated Delay.
Delay elements and the accurate delaying of signals (in time) is critical to high speed performance. Process variations in ICs (integrated circuits) fabrication affect the delay element and cause variation in the delay of fabricated elements. This presents a technical problem for which a technical solution using a technical means is needed.
The invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings.
In one embodiment of the invention, a new and novel approach to implement on-die (e.g. integrated circuit (IC)) constant delay is disclosed. The new approach involves pumping a current into a capacitor and implementing a delay as the capacitor voltage rises from zero to a reference voltage. In one embodiment of the invention, with a temperature-independent current proportional to μn/Tox (μn is electron mobility and Tox is oxide thickness), with a capacitor proportional to 1/Tox, and with a PVT-independent (process, voltage, temperature) reference voltage, a delay is obtained that is only dependent on μn, which has a low dependency on process variations. Fine on-die delay control is achievable with this approach. Thus a dramatic and unexpected (accurate delay and fine control) result was achieved.
In one embodiment of the invention, for example as used in DDR3/DDR4 Memory System's Memory Buffer, Register and/or Data Buffer designs, implementation of on-die constant delay with tight spread is achieved in order to meet very stringent chip propagation delay specifications.
In one embodiment of the invention, the current is implemented as temperature-independent but proportional to μn/Tox (μn is electron mobility and Tox is oxide thickness). In one embodiment of the invention, a capacitor C is implemented using a thick-oxide nMOS (n-channel metal oxide semiconductor) varactor. The usage of a varactor eliminates threshold related effects for C. Usage of thick-oxide eliminates any gate leakage concerns. The capacitance varies inversely with gate oxide thickness, Tox. The combined effect is that the voltage of an output node (OUT) is dependent upon only μn, which has a low dependency on process variations.
In one embodiment of the invention, a bandgap reference has a positive temperature coefficient. The quasi CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) beta multiplier has a negative temperature coefficient. The combined effect is current (Iout) that is dependent upon only electron mobility, μn, which has a low dependency on process variations.
In one embodiment of the invention, a circuit using the techniques described was implemented using a process that contained a bandgap with a positive temperature coefficient. The capacitor was implemented via a thick-oxide nMOS varactor. The thick-oxide varies by over ±7% across process in reality, however using this disclosed novel approach, a temperature-independent delay is obtained that is dependent on only electron mobility, μn, which has a low dependency on process variations.
In one embodiment of the invention, a simulated delay has [−2.26, 3.29]% delay variation across PVT (Process, Voltage, Temperature).
In one embodiment of the invention, a pMOS (p-channel MOS) varactor may be used for the capacitor.
In one embodiment of the invention, an nMOS (n-channel MOS) varactor may be used for the capacitor.
In one embodiment of the invention, a regular pMOS and/or nMOS device may be used for the capacitor.
The circuit was implemented using a given process G (
A nMOS device such as that shown in
Using this novel disclosed approach, a temperature-independent delay is obtained that is dependent on only electron mobility, μn, which has a low dependency on process variations. The simulated delay has [−2.26, 3.29]% delay variation across PVT (Process, Voltage, Temperature).
Thus a Process Compensated Delay has been described.
Because of the high accuracy and noise considerations in embodiments of the present invention (for example, delay speed) specialized hardware is required.
As used in this description, “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” or similar phrases means that the feature(s) being described are included in at least one embodiment of the invention. References to “one embodiment” in this description do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment; however, neither are such embodiments mutually exclusive. Nor does “one embodiment” imply that there is but a single embodiment of the invention. For example, a feature, structure, act, etc. described in “one embodiment” may also be included in other embodiments. Thus, the invention may include a variety of combinations and/or integrations of the embodiments described herein.
As used in this description, “substantially” or “substantially equal” or similar phrases are used to indicate that the items are very close or similar. Since two physical entities can never be exactly equal, a phrase such as “substantially equal” is used to indicate that they are for all practical purposes equal.
As used in this description, “primarily” or similar phrases are used to indicate that the item(s) discussed is a significant factor and is predominately more important or having greater influence than other factors.
As used in this description, “low dependency” or “low dependency on process variations” or similar phrases are used to indicate that the item(s) discussed is not significantly affected by the factor discussed.
It is to be understood that in any one or more embodiments of the invention where alternative approaches or techniques are discussed that any and all such combinations as may be possible are hereby disclosed. For example, if there are five techniques discussed that are all possible, then denoting each technique as follows: A, B, C, D, E, each technique may be either present or not present with every other technique, thus yielding 2^5 or 32 combinations, in binary order ranging from not A and not B and not C and not D and not E to A and B and C and D and E. Applicant(s) hereby claims all such possible combinations. Applicant(s) hereby submit that the foregoing combinations comply with applicable EP (European Patent) standards. No preference is given any combination.
Thus a Process Compensated Delay has been described.
The present Application for Patent claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 61/784,152 titled “Process Compensated Delay” filed Mar. 14, 2013, and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5130564 | Sin | Jul 1992 | A |
6060930 | Choi | May 2000 | A |
6111440 | Rajagopalan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6404260 | Cruz-Albrecht | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6972530 | Xin-LeBlanc | Dec 2005 | B1 |
20130009622 | Hu et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Rasoul Dehghani and S. M. Atarodi, A New Low Voltage Precision CMOS Current Reference With No External Components, p. 928, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61784152 | Mar 2013 | US |