Process control for increased robustness of genetic assays

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10429399
  • Patent Number
    10,429,399
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 18, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 1, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
The present disclosure describes a method of processing a biological sample. The method includes contacting the sample with a pH indicator that changes color in response to changes in pH. The presence of a pH indicator such as cresol red provides the benefit of improved visualization of the sample, verification that the sample is properly frozen and thawed, and increased precision in pH adjustments during the assay, among other benefits.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention generally relates to compositions and methods for processing a biological sample. More specifically, it relates to compositions and methods for analyzing a sample in a preimplantation genetic screening assay.


BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is a procedure in which one or more cells are biopsied from an embryo and analyzed to determine the karyotype of the embryo. The biopsy typically is performed by an embryologist, who places the cell(s) in a tube with 2-3 ul of liquid before freezing and delivering to a laboratory for testing. The laboratory receives the frozen liquid containing the biopsied cell(s), and performs a lysis procedure to liberate the nucleic acid. The lysis can be performed in several different ways, but the most common technique uses an alkaline solution, optionally in the presence of elevated temperature, to lyse the cell(s) and potentially denature and/or shear the nucleic acid for downstream analysis.


By profiling embryos for certain genetic disorders, a prospective parent may select embryos that lack the disorder, have an increased chance of successful pregnancy, have a lower predisposition to cancer, and a variety of other considerations. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis is used to select desired oocytes or embryos from a group of oocytes or fertilized embryos, some of which may be at risk, rather than assaying for a specific disease or condition. Preimplantation genetic screening can also be used to select embryos that have a euploid chromosome complement (22 pairs of autosomes and 2 sex chromosomes), or that lack finer-scale genomic rearrangements including translocations or sub-chromosomal gains or losses, thereby increasing the chance that the embryo will successfully implant, develop to term, and result in a healthy live birth, and decreasing the potential desire for selective pregnancy termination.


Preimplantation genetic screening may involve removing multiple eggs from a donor, fertilizing them to produce embryos, analyzing the embryos, and selecting an embryo that meets certain desired characteristics. To analyze a preimplanted embryo or blastocyst, only a small amount of cellular material can generally be biopsied. Because the embryo or blastocyst may have only a few dozen cells altogether, a PGS assay may involve biopsying only a single cell. Generally, the cell or cells are biopsied and analyzed to determine the karyotype of the embryo.


SUMMARY

The present disclosure provides compositions and related methods for processing a cellular sample. Specifically, methods of the invention involve utilizing an optical indicator in order to determine whether a liquid sample comprising cells is frozen prior to shipment for laboratory testing, and for monitoring and ensuring the integrity of the process in the laboratory that lyses the cells to free their nucleic acid for downstream analysis. Moreover, it has been discovered that certain indicators are also useful in stabilizing the sample as well as monitoring pH.


In one embodiment, a cellular sample is obtained by biopsy and placed in an appropriate buffer or collection storage fluid. The indicator, described more specifically below, is added and the sample is frozen. Alternately, a cellular sample can be obtained by biopsy and placed into an appropriate storage or collection fluid that already contains the indicator. A color change in the indicator is used to determine that the sample is frozen and is sufficient for delivery to a laboratory. The laboratory may be on the same premises that obtains and freezes the sample or may be remote (i.e., the frozen sample can simply be stored prior to delivery to laboratory personnel for testing). Alternatively, a change in electrical conductivity in the sample is used to monitor the indicator.


A particularly useful mode of practicing the invention is in the context of preimplantation genetic screening in which the quality and position of the frozen sample is critical prior to processing for genetic analysis. Biopsied embryonic material is placed in a collection tube with a collection buffer. An indicator is then added to the collection tube. Any indicator that is useful in determining whether the sample has been prepared properly may be used. However, a particularly useful indicator in the context of PGS is cresol red, or another triarylmethane dye. Cresol red is an example of a halochromic chromophore that changes color within the visible spectrum in response to changes in pH. The presence of cresol red aids in visualizing the small aliquot of liquid used in PGS, thereby allowing for improved monitoring of liquid placement and freezing, as well as monitoring fine pH adjustments. After the initial collection of sample and the addition of cresol red, the sample is often optionally frozen and shipped to another laboratory for further analysis. Proper freezing and thawing of the sample are necessary for maintaining the integrity of the cellular sample. Cresol red has been discovered to change color in response to freezing, and so its presence in the tube is useful for alerting a clinician handling the sample whether it has been properly frozen or thawed.


After thawing, the sample may be lysed by adding an alkaline lysis solution to the tube. The clinician performing the method can monitor the liquid for the appropriate color change and adjust the pH by titrating with an acid or base, as needed, to achieve the proper range for the lysis step. After lysis, the pH is neutralized by adding a neutralization solution and again monitoring for an appropriate color change, which signals that the sample has achieved the proper range. The pH can again be fine-tuned as necessary to ensure the appropriate neutral pH for subsequent downstream analysis.


The presence of cresol red or another pH indicator in the liquid mixture allows a clinician to ensure that: a) the liquid is in the bottom of the tube before freezing; b) the liquid is frozen before the tubes are shipped by the embryologist; c) the liquid is frozen when received by the laboratory; d) a volume of alkaline solution sufficient to increase pH is added to the tube; and e) a volume of acid sufficient to neutralize pH is added to the tube.


In alternative embodiments of the method, the pH indicator can be added at any step. Because a pH indicator such as cresol red provides multiple benefits at various steps throughout the method (i.e., visualizing the liquid before freezing, ensuring proper freezing and thawing, and monitoring subtle pH changes), it is beneficial to add it early in the procedure. However, those of skill in the art will understand that some assays may not require early addition of the pH indicator, such as assays that do not involve freezing, for example. Also, some assays that have other limitations, such as where the addition of pH indicator would interfere with an early step in the protocol, would also benefit from a later addition of the indicator.


After each step performed in the laboratory, the color change of the pH indicator can be monitored by eye. Alternatively it can be monitored automatically by a system including a camera controlled by computer software capable of determining the precise color of the solution, and therefore the precise pH. The computer software can flag any samples that are not at the correct pH for intervention to ensure that the solution is brought to the correct pH before downstream analytical steps are performed. If a sample has an incorrect pH, it can be adjusted by adding an appropriate amount of acid or base, either by automated means or manually by the clinician.


The method can be performed using cresol red, any other triarylmethane dye, or any other pH indicator that changes color in response to changes in pH, as long as the pH indicator is compatible with downstream analytical steps. For example, a pH indicator that is known to interfere with the activity of Taq polymerase would not be useful for an assay that required Taq-based PCR after lysis and neutralization.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows the steps of a method for processing a biological sample.



FIGS. 2A and 2B show a variety of pH indicators and their characteristic color ranges.



FIG. 3 shows a system configured to identify color changes in a halochromic chromophore using a camera.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure describes methods of processing a biological sample. The method includes contacting the sample with an indicator that changes color in response to changes in pH. The presence of a pH indicator, such as cresol red, provides the benefit of improved visualization of the sample, verification that the sample is properly frozen and thawed, and increased precision in pH adjustments during the assay, among other benefits.


The method is particularly useful for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). PGS assays generally involve small samples in small volumes of liquid, which must be frozen and thawed prior to analysis. Additionally, PGS protocols require various pH adjustments that must be precise in order to maintain the efficacy of the assay. The addition of a pH indicator such as cresol red to the liquid mixture allows a clinician to ensure that: a) the liquid is in the bottom of the tube before freezing; b) the liquid is frozen before the tubes are shipped by the embryologist; c) the liquid is frozen when received by the laboratory; d) a volume of alkaline solution sufficient to increase pH is added to the tube; and e) a volume of acid sufficient to neutralize pH is added to the tube.


While the methods described herein are particularly useful for PGS analysis, they can also be used for other assays of biological materials. In addition to assaying an embryonic sample, the methods can be used to analyze a buccal sample, a blood sample, an amniotic fluid sample, a cervical sample, an ocular sample, or any other sample comprising cells or cellular materials including nucleic acid. The methods described herein can be adapted to any assay known in the art that requires one or more steps involving a change in pH of the sample or reaction mixture.


Although a preferred embodiment of the invention involves the use of cresol red, the method can be performed using another triarylmethane dye. Triarylmethane dyes are synthetic organic compounds containing triphenylmethane backbones, and presenting intense colors in the visual spectrum. Many react to changes in pH, and are therefore useful as pH indicators. Any other pH indicator can be used with methods of the invention, as long as it changes color or otherwise reacts in response to changes in pH, and it is compatible with downstream analytical steps. For example, a pH indicator that is known to interfere with the activity of Taq polymerase would not be useful for an assay that involved Taq-based PCR downstream of the lysis and neutralization steps.



FIG. 1 is a flowchart 100 depicting a series of steps in a preferred embodiment of the invention. The flowchart 100 shows steps for processing a biological sample by methods of the present disclosure. In step 110, a sample comprising cells is obtained from a subject. The sample can be comprised of one or more cells biopsied from an embryo or oocyte of a subject. After the sample is collected it is contacted with a collection medium in step 120. The collection medium can be a buffer, an alcohol, a preservative medium, or any other such medium that would be known to a person skilled in the art. Often for PGS analysis, the volume of collection medium is very small. It can be, for example, 1 μl or less. The volume can also be about 2 μl, 3 μl, 4 μl, 5 μl, 10 μl, 20 μl, 50 μl, 100 μl, or more, depending on the needs of the assay.


After step 120, the sample may be frozen and shipped to another lab to perform the subsequent steps of the procedure. Alternatively, all steps can be performed in a single lab, obviating the need to freeze and thaw the sample. In embodiments of the invention that involve freezing the collection sample, the collection sample is thawed prior to performing step 130. In step 130, the cells in the collection sample are lysed by the addition of an alkaline lysis solution to the mixture. In other embodiments of the method, the cells are lysed using other techniques, such as mechanical shearing, osmotic lysing, chemical denaturing, centrifuging, sonicating, freeze-thawing, or other techniques known in the art.


When lysis is performed using an alkaline solution, such as in step 130, optionally the solution can be exposed to elevated temperatures to further catalyze the lysis process. In step 130 the cell or cells in the mixture are lysed and nucleic acids therein may also be denatured or sheared, preparing them for downstream analysis.


Following step 130, the solution is neutralized in step 140 by adding a neutralization solution. Generally the neutralization solution will be acidic, to neutralize the alkaline lysis solution. The lysis step 130 and the neutralizing step 140 both require precision to achieve proper pH levels. Imprecision in the pipetted volume of either the lysis reagent or the neutralizing reagent will result in a suboptimal pH. If the pH after step 140 is not neutral, for example, the downstream steps may be impeded, which may lead to assay failure.


For that reason, among others, a pH indicator is added in step 150. A pH indicator such as cresol red is useful with methods of the invention. Cresol red is a halochromic chromophore that changes color within the visible spectrum in response to changes in pH. It appears yellow below pH 7.2, red until pH 8.8, and violet above pH 8.8. The color change of the pH indicator can be monitored by eye, or it can be monitored automatically by a system including a camera controlled by computer software capable of determining the precise color of the solution, and therefore the precise pH. The computer software can flag any samples that are not at the correct pH, and a clinician can intervene to ensure that the solution is brought to the optimal pH before downstream analytical steps are performed. That intervention can also be automated, whereby the computer system triggers a pH adjustment in response to identifying an incorrect pH. The pH adjustments, whether performed manually by a lab technician or automatically by a computer system, can be achieved by adding an appropriate amount of acid or base as necessary.


In various embodiments of FIG. 1, step 150 can occur immediately downstream of any of steps 110-140. Methods of the invention include the step of contacting the sample with an indicator 150 immediately after step 110, step 120, step 130, or step 140. In other embodiments, step 150 is performed simultaneously with steps 120, 130, 140, or 150.


The addition of a pH indicator such as cresol red has advantages at various stages of the method. The presence of cresol red or another compatible pH indicator helps monitor the sample throughout a procedure that requires multiple fine pH adjustments. Further, as discussed above, the sample is often frozen and shipped to another laboratory for further analysis after the initial collection of sample. That means that proper freezing and thawing of the sample are necessary for maintaining the integrity of the cellular sample. It has been discovered that cresol red changes color in response to freezing and thawing, and so its presence in the sample mixture at steps 120, 130, and 140 help to verify that the sample has been properly handled. Additionally, cresol red allows easier visualization of small amounts of liquid in the sample tube. Therefore, the presence of cresol red is especially useful in PGS and other similar assays, where the volume is small and the clinician must ensure that the sample is at the bottom of the tube prior to freezing.


In addition to cresol red, other pH indicators that are useful in other embodiments of the disclosed invention are gentian violet (Methyl violet 10B), malachite green, thymol blue, methyl yellow, bromophenol blue, congo red, methyl orange, bromocresol green, methyl red, azolitmin, bromocresol purple, bromothymol blue, phenol red, neutral red, naphtholphthalein, cresolphthalein, phenolphthalein, thymolphthalein, alizarine yellow R, and any other common laboratory pH indicator known in the art.



FIGS. 2A-B show a list of several pH indicators that can be used with the invention, along with the characteristic color changes for each indicator at different pH levels. As shown in FIGS. 2A-B, several indicators have overlapping ranges for most levels of pH. That means that for a given assay requiring a specific pH, numerous pH indicators could be used. For the PGS assay described above, indicators such as neutral red and phenol red have similar ranges as cresol red, and therefore could be substituted. For assays involving different pH requirements, a pH indicator can be selected that has a suitable range that would allow an observer to differentiate between subtle pH variances as needed.


In addition to those listed in FIGS. 2A-B, other pH indicators include anthocyanins, litmus, and hydrangea flowers. Additionally, fluorescent dyes can be used as direct pH indicators, as fluorescence is a function of pH. Nucleic acid reporter molecules, which denature at pH extremes and renature or otherwise change structural formation at neutral pH, can also be used. These can be coupled with flourophore/quencher pair, a FRET pair, or mixed with intercalating dye for structural readout. Protein reporter molecules, which change conformation as a function of pH, can be used in a similar manner as can pH sensitive fluorescent proteins (see, e.g., Kneen, 1998, “Green fluorescent protein as a noninvasive intracellular pH indicator,” Biophys J. 74(3):1591-99; Miesenböck, 1998, “Visualizing secretion and synaptic transmission with pH-sensitive green fluorescent proteins,” Nature 394(6689):192-95; and Llopis, 1998, “Measurement of cytosolic, mitochondrial, and Golgi pH in single living cells with green fluorescent proteins,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95(12):6803-08).


Additionally, pH can be measured electronically using a pH meter. Electronic pH meters are available, such as the Hach HQ440D Benchtop Meter, available from Hach Company (Loveland, Col.). Also available are miniaturized pH meters such as Ion Torrent or ion-sensitive field-effect transistors, which detect ion concentration changes in a solution and respond with a changed current through a transistor. As discussed above, in all cases, the selected pH measurement technique should be compatible with downstream analytical steps. Some halochromic chromophores, such as bromophenol blue, for example, are known to interfere with the normal activity of Taq polymerase, and so would not be an optimal choice if a Taq-based PCR were to be performed on the nucleic acid after lysis and neutralization.


The disclosure additionally provides a composition of matter, the composition comprising a sample comprising one or more cells, a collection medium, an alkaline lysis solution, a neutralization solution, and a pH indicator. The composition provides a reaction mixture for PGS analysis that is more stable and that is easier to adjust for desired pH levels than compositions of the prior art. The composition can comprise a sample that has been biopsied from an embryo. Alternatively the sample can be a buccal sample, a blood sample, an amniotic fluid sample, a cervical sample, an ocular sample, or any other sample comprising cells or cellular materials including nucleic acid. The collection medium can be a buffer, an alcohol, or a preservative medium, or any other similar medium known in the art. The neutralization solution comprises any solution that neutralizes the pH of the lysis solution. Therefore, when the lysis solution is alkaline, the neutralization solution is acidic. The pH indicator can be cresol red, or any other pH indicator listed in FIGS. 2A-B or otherwise known in the art. The composition can be produced in conjunction with the methods described herein.


As discussed above, the color changes of the pH indicator can be observed by an automated mechanism such as a camera connected to a computer. As one skilled in the art would recognize as necessary or best-suited for performance of the methods of the invention, computer system or machines of the invention include one or more processors (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU) a graphics processing unit (GPU) or both), a main memory and a static memory, which communicate with each other via a bus.


In an exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 3, system 200 can include a camera 201 with data acquisition module 205 to obtain sequence read data. Camera 201 may optionally include or be operably coupled to its own, e.g., dedicated, camera computer 233 (including an input/output mechanism 237, one or more of processor 241 and memory 245). Additionally or alternatively, camera 201 may be operably coupled to a server 213 or computer 249 (e.g., laptop, desktop, or tablet) via network 209. Computer 249 includes one or more processor 259 and memory 263 as well as an input/output mechanism 254. Where methods of the invention employ a client/server architecture, steps of methods of the invention may be performed using server 213, which includes one or more of processor 221 and memory 229, capable of obtaining data, instructions, etc., or providing results via interface module 225 or providing results as a file 217. Server 213 may be engaged over network 209 through computer 249 or terminal 267, or server 213 may be directly connected to terminal 267, including one or more processor 275 and memory 279, as well as input/output mechanism 271.


System 200 or machines according to the invention may further include, for any of I/O 249, 237, or 271 a video display unit (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). Computer systems or machines according to the invention can also include an alphanumeric input device (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit, a signal generation device (e.g., a speaker), a touchscreen, an accelerometer, a microphone, a cellular radio frequency antenna, and a network interface device, which can be, for example, a network interface card (NIC), Wi-Fi card, or cellular modem.


Memory 263, 245, 279, or 229 according to the invention can include a machine-readable medium on which is stored one or more sets of instructions (e.g., software) embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The software may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory and/or within the processor during execution thereof by the computer system, the main memory and the processor also constituting machine-readable media.


The software may further be transmitted or received over a network via the network interface device.


While the machine-readable medium can in an exemplary embodiment be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories (e.g., subscriber identity module (SIM) card, secure digital card (SD card), micro SD card, or solid-state drive (SSD)), optical and magnetic media, and any other tangible storage media.


INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

References and citations to other documents, such as patents, patent applications, patent publications, journals, books, papers, web contents, have been made throughout this disclosure. All such documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.


EQUIVALENTS

Various modifications of the invention and many further embodiments thereof, in addition to those shown and described herein, will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the full contents of this document, including references to the scientific and patent literature cited herein. The subject matter herein contains important information, exemplification and guidance that can be adapted to the practice of this invention in its various embodiments and equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A method for processing a biological sample, the method comprising: obtaining a sample comprising at least one cell biopsied from an embryo in a solution of 2-3 μl of liquid;contacting the sample with an indicator dye comprising cresol red that provides a visual indication that the sample is frozen and within a specific, pre-defined pH range;exposing the sample to a freezing temperature;determining based on the visual indication that the sample is frozen; andperforming a preimplantation genetic screening procedure comprising: using a camera controlled by computer software to evaluate a color of the sample;confirming with the computer software that the color indicates that the sample remains frozen;contacting the sample with an alkaline lysis solution followed by contacting the sample with an acid to achieve a neutral pH;using the camera and the computer software to evaluate a color of the sample and confirm that the sample has a neutral pH; andanalyzing a karyotype of the at least one biopsied cell in the sample.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: assessing said indicator in order to determine if the pH range is appropriate; anddelivering the sample to a laboratory if said indicator indicates that the sample is frozen.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of assessing said indicator in order to determine a position of said cells in a vial containing the sample.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the alkaline lysis solution contains said indicator; and wherein the acid contains said indicator.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein said assessing step is performed by observing a color change in the sample.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein color change is monitored by automatic means, wherein the automatic means comprises a camera.
  • 7. The method of claim 2, wherein said assessing step is performed by monitoring electrical conductivity in the sample.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/054,725, filed Sep. 24, 2014, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (318)
Number Name Date Kind
4149852 Tiru et al. Apr 1979 A
4683195 Mullis et al. Jul 1987 A
4683202 Mullis Jul 1987 A
4988617 Landegren et al. Jan 1991 A
5060980 Johnson et al. Oct 1991 A
5210015 Gelfand et al. May 1993 A
5234809 Boom et al. Aug 1993 A
5242794 Whiteley et al. Sep 1993 A
5342328 Grossman et al. Aug 1994 A
5348853 Wang et al. Sep 1994 A
5459307 Klotz, Jr. Oct 1995 A
5486686 Zdybel, Jr. et al. Jan 1996 A
5494810 Barany et al. Feb 1996 A
5567583 Wang et al. Oct 1996 A
5583024 McElroy et al. Dec 1996 A
5604097 Brenner Feb 1997 A
5636400 Young Jun 1997 A
5674713 McElroy et al. Oct 1997 A
5695934 Brenner Dec 1997 A
5700673 McElroy et al. Dec 1997 A
5701256 Marr et al. Dec 1997 A
5766875 Hafeman Jun 1998 A
5830064 Bradish et al. Nov 1998 A
5846719 Brenner et al. Dec 1998 A
5863722 Brenner Jan 1999 A
5866337 Schon Feb 1999 A
5869252 Bouma et al. Feb 1999 A
5869717 Frame et al. Feb 1999 A
5871921 Landegren et al. Feb 1999 A
5888788 De Miniac Mar 1999 A
5942391 Zhang et al. Aug 1999 A
5971921 Timbel Oct 1999 A
5993611 Moroney, III et al. Nov 1999 A
5994056 Higuchi Nov 1999 A
6033854 Kumit et al. Mar 2000 A
6033872 Bergsma et al. Mar 2000 A
6100099 Gordon et al. Aug 2000 A
6138077 Brenner Oct 2000 A
6150516 Brenner et al. Nov 2000 A
6171785 Higuchi Jan 2001 B1
6172214 Brenner Jan 2001 B1
6172218 Brenner Jan 2001 B1
6179819 Haswell Jan 2001 B1
6197508 Stanley Mar 2001 B1
6197574 Miyamoto Mar 2001 B1
6210891 Nyren et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223128 Allex et al. Apr 2001 B1
6235472 Landegren et al. May 2001 B1
6235475 Brenner et al. May 2001 B1
6235501 Gautsch et al. May 2001 B1
6235502 Weissman et al. May 2001 B1
6258568 Nyren Jul 2001 B1
6274320 Rothberg et al. Aug 2001 B1
6306597 Macevicz Oct 2001 B1
6335200 Tiru et al. Jan 2002 B1
6352828 Brenner Mar 2002 B1
6360235 Tilt et al. Mar 2002 B1
6361940 Van Ness et al. Mar 2002 B1
6403320 Read et al. Jun 2002 B1
6462254 Vemachio et al. Oct 2002 B1
6489105 Matlashewski et al. Dec 2002 B1
6558928 Landegren May 2003 B1
6569920 Wen et al. May 2003 B1
6582938 Su et al. Jun 2003 B1
6585938 Machida et al. Jul 2003 B1
6613516 Christians et al. Sep 2003 B1
6714874 Myers et al. Mar 2004 B1
6716580 Gold et al. Apr 2004 B2
6719449 Laugharn, Jr. et al. Apr 2004 B1
6818395 Quake et al. Nov 2004 B1
6828100 Ronaghi Dec 2004 B1
6833246 Balasubramanian Dec 2004 B2
6858412 Willis et al. Feb 2005 B2
6911345 Quake et al. Jun 2005 B2
6913879 Schena Jul 2005 B1
6927024 Dodge et al. Aug 2005 B2
6941317 Chamberlin et al. Sep 2005 B1
6948843 Laugharn, Jr. et al. Sep 2005 B2
7034143 Preparata et al. Apr 2006 B1
7041481 Anderson et al. May 2006 B2
7049077 Yang May 2006 B2
7057026 Barnes et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071324 Preparata et al. Jul 2006 B2
7074564 Landegren Jul 2006 B2
7074586 Cheronis et al. Jul 2006 B1
7115400 Adessi et al. Oct 2006 B1
7169560 Lapidus et al. Jan 2007 B2
7211390 Rothberg et al. May 2007 B2
7232656 Balasubramanian et al. Jun 2007 B2
7244559 Rothberg et al. Jul 2007 B2
RE39793 Brenner Aug 2007 E
7264929 Rothberg et al. Sep 2007 B2
7282337 Harris Oct 2007 B1
7297518 Quake et al. Nov 2007 B2
7320860 Landegren et al. Jan 2008 B2
7323305 Leamon et al. Jan 2008 B2
7335762 Rothberg et al. Feb 2008 B2
7351528 Landegren Apr 2008 B2
7393665 Brenner Jul 2008 B2
7510829 Faham et al. Mar 2009 B2
7523117 Zhang et al. Apr 2009 B2
7537889 Sinha et al. May 2009 B2
7537897 Brenner et al. May 2009 B2
7544473 Brenner Jun 2009 B2
7582431 Drmanac et al. Sep 2009 B2
7598035 Macevicz Oct 2009 B2
7629151 Gold et al. Dec 2009 B2
7642056 Ahn et al. Jan 2010 B2
7666593 Lapidus Feb 2010 B2
7700323 Willis et al. Apr 2010 B2
7774962 Ladd Aug 2010 B1
7776616 Heath et al. Aug 2010 B2
RE41780 Anderson et al. Sep 2010 E
7790388 Landegren et al. Sep 2010 B2
7809509 Milosavljevic Oct 2010 B2
7835871 Kain et al. Nov 2010 B2
7862999 Zheng et al. Jan 2011 B2
7865534 Genstruct Jan 2011 B2
7883849 Dahl Feb 2011 B1
7957913 Chinitz et al. Jun 2011 B2
7960120 Rigatti et al. Jun 2011 B2
7985716 Yershov et al. Jul 2011 B2
7993880 Willis et al. Aug 2011 B2
8024128 Rabinowitz et al. Sep 2011 B2
8114027 Triva Feb 2012 B2
8165821 Zhang Apr 2012 B2
8209130 Kennedy et al. Jun 2012 B1
8283116 Bhattacharyya et al. Oct 2012 B1
8462161 Barber Jun 2013 B1
8463895 Arora et al. Jun 2013 B2
8474228 Adair et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496166 Burns et al. Jul 2013 B2
8529744 Marziali et al. Sep 2013 B2
8778609 Umbarger Jul 2014 B1
8812422 Nizzari et al. Aug 2014 B2
8847799 Kennedy et al. Sep 2014 B1
8976049 Kennedy et al. Mar 2015 B2
9074244 Sparks et al. Jul 2015 B2
9228233 Kennedy et al. Jan 2016 B2
9292527 Kennedy et al. Mar 2016 B2
9535920 Kennedy et al. Jan 2017 B2
9567639 Oliphant et al. Feb 2017 B2
20010007742 Landergren Jul 2001 A1
20010046673 French et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020001800 Lapidus Jan 2002 A1
20020040216 Dumont et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020091666 Rice et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020164629 Quake et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020182609 Arcot Dec 2002 A1
20020187496 Andersson et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020190663 Rasmussen Dec 2002 A1
20030166057 Hildebrand et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030175709 Murphy et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177105 Xiao et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030203370 Yakhini et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208454 Rienhoff et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030224384 Sayood et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040029264 Robbins, Jr. Feb 2004 A1
20040106112 Nilsson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040142325 Mintz et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040152108 Keith et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040170965 Scholl Sep 2004 A1
20040171051 Holloway Sep 2004 A1
20040197813 Hoffman et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040209299 Pinter et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050003369 Christians et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050026204 Landegren Feb 2005 A1
20050032095 Wigler et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050048505 Fredrick et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050059048 Gunderson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050100900 Kawashima et al. May 2005 A1
20050112590 Boom et al. May 2005 A1
20050186589 Kowalik et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050214811 Margulies et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050244879 Schumm et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050272065 Lakey et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060019304 Hardenbol et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060024681 Smith et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060078894 Winkler et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060149047 Nanduri Jul 2006 A1
20060177837 Borozan et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060183132 Fu et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060192047 Goossen Aug 2006 A1
20060195269 Yeatman et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060292585 Nautiyal et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060292611 Berka et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070020640 McCloskey et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070042369 Reese et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070092883 Schouten et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070114362 Feng et al. May 2007 A1
20070128624 Gormley et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070161013 Hantash Jul 2007 A1
20070162983 Hesterkamp et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070166705 Milton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070225487 Nilsson et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070238122 Allbritton et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244675 Shai et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070264653 Berlin et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080003142 Link et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080014589 Link et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080076118 Tooke et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080081330 Kahvejian Apr 2008 A1
20080085836 Kearns et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080090239 Shoemaker et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080176209 Muller et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080269068 Church et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080280955 McCamish Nov 2008 A1
20080293589 Shapero Nov 2008 A1
20090009904 Yasuna et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090019156 Mo et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090026082 Rothberg et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090029385 Christians et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090042206 Schneider et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090098551 Landers et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090099041 Church et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105081 Rodesch et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119313 Pearce May 2009 A1
20090127589 Rothberg et al. May 2009 A1
20090129647 Dimitrova et al. May 2009 A1
20090156412 Boyce, IV et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090163366 Nickerson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090181389 Li et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090191565 Lapidus et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192047 Parr et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090202984 Cantor Aug 2009 A1
20090203014 Wu et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090226975 Sabot et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090233814 Bashkirov et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090298064 Batzoglou et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090301382 Patel Dec 2009 A1
20090318310 Liu et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100035243 Muller et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100035252 Rothberg et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100063742 Hart et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069263 Shendure et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100086926 Craig et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100105107 Hildebrand et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100137143 Rothberg et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100137163 Link et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100143908 Gillevet Jun 2010 A1
20100159440 Messier et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100188073 Rothberg et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100196911 Hoffman et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100197507 Rothberg et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100216151 Lapidus et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100216153 Lapidus et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100248984 Shaffer et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100282617 Rothberg et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100285578 Selden et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100297626 McKernan et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100300559 Schultz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100300895 Nobile et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100301042 Kahlert Dec 2010 A1
20100301398 Rothberg et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100304982 Hinz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100311061 Korlach et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100330619 Willis et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110004413 Carnevali et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110009278 Kain et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110015863 Pevzner et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110021366 Chinitz et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110034342 Fox Feb 2011 A1
20110092375 Zamore et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098193 Kingsmore et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110117544 Lexow May 2011 A1
20110159499 Hindson et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110166029 Margulies et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110224105 Kurn et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110230365 Rohlfs et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110257889 Klammer et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110288780 Rabinowitz et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110301042 Steinmann et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120013911 Ruschin Jan 2012 A1
20120015050 Abkevich et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120021930 Schoen et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120046877 Hyland et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059594 Hatchwell et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120074925 Oliver Mar 2012 A1
20120079980 Taylor et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120115736 Bjornson et al. May 2012 A1
20120164630 Porreca et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120165202 Porreca et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120179384 Kuramitsu et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120214678 Rava et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120216151 Sarkar et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120236861 Ganeshalingam et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120245041 Brenner et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120252020 Shuber Oct 2012 A1
20120252684 Selifonov et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120258461 Weisbart Oct 2012 A1
20120270212 Rabinowitz et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120270739 Rava et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130130921 Gao et al. May 2013 A1
20130178378 Hatch et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130183672 de Laat et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130222388 McDonald Aug 2013 A1
20130268474 Nizzari et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130275103 Struble et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130288242 Stoughton et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130323730 Curry et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130332081 Reese et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130344096 Chiang et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140129201 Kennedy et al. May 2014 A1
20140136120 Colwell et al. May 2014 A1
20140206552 Rabinowitz et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140222349 Higgins et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140228226 Yin et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140318274 Zimmerman et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140342354 Evans et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140361022 Finneran Dec 2014 A1
20150051085 Vogelstein et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150056613 Kural Feb 2015 A1
20150178445 Cibulskis et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150299767 Armour et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160034638 Spence et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160210486 Porreca et al. Jul 2016 A1
20170044610 Johnson Feb 2017 A1
20170129964 Cheung May 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (46)
Number Date Country
1 321 477 Jun 2003 EP
1 564 306 Aug 2005 EP
10770071.8 Nov 2010 EP
2425240 Mar 2012 EP
2 437 191 Apr 2012 EP
2716766 Apr 2014 EP
95011995 May 1995 WO
96019586 Jun 1996 WO
98014275 Apr 1998 WO
98044151 Oct 1998 WO
9964832 Dec 1999 WO
00018957 Apr 2000 WO
02093453 Nov 2002 WO
2004015609 Feb 2004 WO
2004018497 Mar 2004 WO
2004083819 Sep 2004 WO
2005003304 Jan 2005 WO
2005079531 Sep 2005 WO
2007010251 Jan 2007 WO
2007107717 Sep 2007 WO
2007123744 Nov 2007 WO
2007135368 Nov 2007 WO
2008067551 Jun 2008 WO
2008093329 Aug 2008 WO
2009036525 Mar 2009 WO
2010024894 Mar 2010 WO
2010126614 Nov 2010 WO
2011006020 Jan 2011 WO
2011102998 Aug 2011 WO
2012006291 Jan 2012 WO
2012040387 Mar 2012 WO
2012051208 Apr 2012 WO
2012087736 Jun 2012 WO
2012109500 Aug 2012 WO
2012134884 Oct 2012 WO
2012149171 Nov 2012 WO
2012170725 Dec 2012 WO
2013052557 Apr 2013 WO
2013058907 Apr 2013 WO
2013148496 Oct 2013 WO
2013164424 Nov 2013 WO
2013177086 Nov 2013 WO
2013191775 Dec 2013 WO
2014074246 May 2014 WO
2014116881 Jul 2014 WO
2015089333 Jun 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (329)
Entry
Heger et al., J. Phys. Chem. B, 110:1277-1287 (2006).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 22, 2016, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/050964, filed Sep. 18, 2015 (6 pages).
Kneen, 1998, “Green fluorescent protein as a noninvasive intracellular pH indicator,” Biophys J. 74(3): 1591-99.
Llopis, 1998, “Measurement of cytosolic, mitochondrial, and Golgi pH in single living cells with green fluorescent proteins,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95(12):6803-08.
Miesenbock, 1998, “Visualizing secretion and synaptic transmission with pH-sensitive green fluorescent proteins,” Nature 394(6689): 192-95.
Jones, 2008, Core signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancers revealed by global genomic analyses, Science 321(5897):1801-1806.
Kambara et al., Optimization of Parameters in a DNA Sequenator Using Fluorescence Detection, Nature Biotechnology 6:816-821 (1988).
Kennedy et al., 2013, Accessing more human genetic variation with short sequencing reads, American Society of Human Genetics 63rd Annual Meeting, Abstract, Oct. 22, 2013.
Kent, 2002, BLAT—The BLAST-like alignment tool, Genome Res 12(4): 656-664.
Kerem, 1989, Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: genetic analysis, Science 245:1073-1080.
Kinde, 2012, FAST-SeqS: a simple an effective method for detection of aneuploidy by massively parallel sequencing, PLoS One 7(7):e41162.
Kircher, 2010, High-througput DNA sequencing—concepts and limitations, Bioassays 32:524-36.
Kirpekar, 1994, Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of enzymatically synthesized RNA up to 150 kDa, Nucl Acids Res 22:3866-3870.
Klein, 2011, LOCAS—A low coverage sequence assembly tool for re-sequencing projects, PLoS One 6(8):e23455.
Koboldt, 2009, VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples, Bioinformatics 25:2283-85.
Krawitz, 2010, Microindel detection in short-read sequence data, Bioinformatics 26(6):722-729.
Kreindler, 2010, Cystic fibrosis: exploiting its genetic basis in the hunt for new therapies, Pharmacol Ther 125(2):219-229.
Krishnakumar, 2008, A comprehensive assay for targeted multiplex amplification of human DNA sequences, PNAS 105:9296-301.
Kumar, 2010, Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data, Genomics 11:571.
Kurtz, 2004, Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes, Genome Biol 5:R12.
Lam, 2008, Compressed indexing and local alignment of DNA, Bioinformatics 24(6):791-97.
Langmead, 2009, Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome, Genome Biol 10:R25.
Larkin, 2007, Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0, Bioinformatics, 23(21):2947-2948.
Lecompte, 2001, Multiple alignment of complete sequences (MACS) in the post-genomic era, Gene 270(1-2):17-30.
Li, 2003, DNA binding and cleavage by the periplasmic nuclease Vvn: a novel structure with a known active site, EMBO J 22(15):4014-4025.
Li, 2008, SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program, Bioinformatics 24(5):713-14.
Li, 2009, Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform, Bioinformatics, 25 (14):1754-60.
Li, 2009, SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment, Bioinformatics 25(15):1966-67.
Li, 2009, The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools, Bioinformatics 25(16):2078-9.
Li, 2010, Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform, Bioinformatics 26(5):589-95.
Li, 2011, Improving SNP discovery by base alignment quality, Bioinformatics 27:1157.
Li, 2011, Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping and point mutation detection by ligation on microarrays, J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11(2):994-1003.
Li, 2012, A new approach to detecting low-level mutations in next-generation sequence data, Genome Biol 13:1-15.
Li, 2014, HUGO: Hierarchical mUlti-reference Genome cOmpression for aligned reads, JAMIA 21:363-373.
Lin, 2008, ZOOM! Zillions of Oligos Mapped, Bioinformatics 24:2431.
Lin, 2010, A molecular inversion prove assay for detecting alternative splicing, BMC Genomics 11(712):1-14.
Lin, 2012, Development and evaluation of a reverse dot blot assay for the simultaneous detection of common alpha and beta thalassemia in Chinese, Blood Cells Molecules, and Diseases 48(2):86-90.
Lipman, 1985, Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches, Science 227(4693):1435-41.
Liu, 2012, Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems, J Biomed Biotech 2012:251364.
Ma, 2006, Application of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), J Am Soc 1-15.
MacArthur, 2014, Guidelines for investigating causality of sequence variants in human disease, Nature 508:469-76.
Maddalena, 2005, Technical standards and guidelines: molecular genetic testing for ultra-rare disorders, Genet Med 7:571-83.
Malewicz, 2010, Pregel: a system for large-scale graph processing, Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int Conf Mgmt Data 135-46.
Mamanova, 2010, Target-enrichment strategies for nextgeneration sequencing, Nature Methods 7(2):111-8.
Margulies, 2005, Genome sequencing in micro-fabricated high-density picotiter reactors, Nature, 437:376-380.
Marras, 1999, Multiplex detection of single-nucleotide variations using molecular beacons, Genetic Analysis: Biomolecular Engineering 14:151.
Maxam, 1977, A new method for sequencing DNA, PNAS, 74:560 564.
May, 1988, How Many Species Are There on Earth?, Science 241(4872):1441-9.
McDonnell, “Antisepsis, disinfection, and sterilization: types, action, and resistance,” p. 239 (2007).
McKenna, 2010, The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data, Genome Res 20(9):1297-1303.
Meldgaard, 2004, Non-invasive method for sampling and extraction of mouse DNA for PCR, Laboratory Animals 38:413-17.
Meyer, 2007, Targeted high-throughput sequencing of tagged nucleic acid samples, Nucleic Acids Research 35(15):a97 (5 pages).
Meyer, 2008, Parallel tagged sequencing on the 454 platform, Nature Protocols 3(2):267-78.
Miller, 2010, Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data, Genomics 95:315-327.
Mills, 2010, Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing, Nature 470(7332):59-65.
Hodges, 2007, Genome-wide in situ exon capture for selective resequencing, Nat Genet 39(12):1522-7.
Holland, 2008, BioJava: an open-source framework for bioinformatics, Bioinformatics 24(18):2096-2097.
Homer et al., 2008, Resolving Individuals Contributing Trace Amounts of DNA to Highly Complex Mixtures Using High-Density SNP Genotyping Microarrays. PLoS One 4(8):e1000167.
Homer, 2009, BFAST: An alignment tool for large scale genome resequencing, PLoS ONE 4(11):e7767.
Housley, 2009, SNP discovery and haplotype analysis in the segmentally duplicated DRD5 coding region, Ann Hum Genet 73(3):274-282.
Huang, 2008, Comparative analysis of common CFTR polymorphisms poly-T, TGrepeats and M470V in a healthy Chinese population, World J Gastroenterol 14(12):1925-30.
Husemann, 2009, Phylogenetic Comparative Assembly, Algorithms in Bioinformatics: 9th International Workshop, pp. 145-156, Salzberg & Warnow, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Hyman, 2010, Multiplex identification of microbes, Appl Env Microbial 76(12):3904-3910.
Illumina, 2010, De Novo assembly using Illumina reads, Technical Note (8 pages).
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2004, Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome, Nature 431:931-945.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2010/01293, dated Oct. 28, 2010, (9 pages).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for WO 2010/126614.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US12/29790, dated Jun. 14, 2012 17 pages.
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Dec. 23, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/056037 (13 Pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for international application No. PCT/US13/62842 with international filing date Oct. 1, 2013, ISR/WO dated Feb. 4, 2014 (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US13/61691 dated Jan. 10, 2014 (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/036575 dated Aug. 12, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/044039 dated Nov. 1, 2013, (15 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/056037 dated Dec. 23, 2015; 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for WO 2010/126614.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 29, 2015 in counterpart PCT Application No. PCT/US14/61138.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 10, 2013 for related application PCT/US13/33435 with an International filing date of Mar. 22, 2013 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 3, 2012, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/065098, filed Dec. 15, 2011 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 12, 2013, for International Patent Applciation No. PCT/US13/36575, filed Apr. 15, 2013 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 2, 2015, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/049132 with Internaional Filing Date Sep. 9, 2015 (14 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 9, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US14/28212, filed Mar. 14, 2014 (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 25, 2013 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US12/55362.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 4, 2014, for Patent Application No. PCT/US13/62842, filed Oct. 1, 2013 (5 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 7, 2015, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US14/60256, filed Oct. 13, 2014 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 10, 2013, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/33435, filed Mar. 22, 2013 (6 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 14, 2012, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US12/29790, filed Mar. 20, 2012 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 28, 2013, for Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/032885, filed Mar. 19, 2013 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 4, 2016, for International patent application No. PCT/US2016/012886 with international filing date Jan. 6, 2015 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 1, 2013, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/044039, filed Jun. 4, 2013 (6 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 16, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/US2015/045247 with International Filing Date Aug. 14, 2015 (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 29, 2015, for Patent Application No. PCT/US14/61138, filed Oct. 17, 2014, (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 29, 2015, for Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/060056, filed Oct. 10, 2014, (14 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2015, for Patent Application No. PCT/US14/40516, filed Jun. 2, 2014 (16 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 2, 2016, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/013346, filed Jan. 14, 2016 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 28, 2010, for Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/001293, filed Apr. 30, 2010 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 3, 2014 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US14/27324, filed Mar. 14, 2014, (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 2, 2015 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/030366, filed May 12, 2015 (12 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Dec. 13, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2016/051928 (14 Pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jun. 12, 2017 for International Application No. PCT/US2017/016498 (12 Pages).
International Search Report for PCT/US12/55362 dated Feb. 25, 2013, p. 15.
Iqbal, 2012, De novo assembly and genotyping of variants using colored de Bruijn graphs, Nature Genetics 44:226-232.
Isosomppi, 2009, Disease-causing mutations in the CLRN1 gene alter normal CLRN1 protien trafficking to the plasma membrane, Mol Vis 15:1806-1818.
Jaijo, 2010, Microarray-based mutation analysis of 183 Spanish families with Usher syndrome, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(3):1311-7.
Jensen, 2001, Orthologs and paralogs—we need to get it right, Genome Biol 2(8):1002-1002.3.
Dahl et al., 2005, Multiplex amplification enabled by selective circularization of large sets of genomic DNA fragments, Nucleic Acids Res 33(8):e71.
Danecek, 2011, The variant call format and VCFtools, Bioinformatics 27(15):2156-2158.
de la Bastide, 2007, Assembling genome DNA sequences with PHRAP, Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 17:11.4.1-11.4.15.
Delcher, 1999, Alignment of whole genomes, Nuc Acids Res 27(11):2369-2376.
den Dunnen, 2003, Mutation Nomenclature, Curr Prot Hum Genet 7.13.1-7.13.8.
Deng et. al., 2012, Supplementary Material, Nature Biotechnology, S1-1-S1-1 1, Retrieved from the Internet on Oct. 24, 2012.
Deng, 2009, Targeted bisulfite sequencing reveals changes in DNA methylation associated with nuclear reprogramming, nature biotechnology 27:353-60 (and supplement).
Deorowicz, 2013, Data compression for sequencing data, Alg for Mole Bio 8:25.
Diep, 2012, Library-free methylation sequencing with bisulfite padlock probes, Nature Methods 9:270-272 (and supplemental information).
DiGuistini, 2009, De novo sequence assembly of a filamentous fungus using Sanger, 454 and Illumina sequence data, Genome Biology, 10:R94.
Dolinsek, 2013, Depletion of unwanted nucleic acid templates by selection cleavage: LNAzymes, catalytically active oligonucleotides containing locked nucleic acids, open a new window for detecting rare microbial community members, App Env Microbiol 79(5):1534-1544.
Dong & Yu, 2011, Mutation surveyor: An in silico tool for sequencing analysis, Methods Mol Biol 760:223-37.
Drmanac, 1992, Sequencing by hybridization: towards an automated sequencing of one million M13 clones arrayed on membranes, Elctrophoresis 13:566-573.
Dudley, 2009, A quick guide for developing effective bioinformatics programming skills, PLoS Comp Biol 5(12): e1000589.
Ericsson, 2008, A dual-tag microarray platform for high-performance nucleic acid and protein analyses, Nucl Acids Res 36:e45.
Examination Report from the European Patent Office for EP 10770071.8 dated Jul. 16, 2013, (5 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 12765217.0 dated Aug. 26, 2014, (5 pages).
Extended European Search Report for EP 15844985.0 dated May 15, 2018 (10 pages).
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 11, 2015, for EP Application 13772357.3 (8 pages).
Fares, 2008, Carrier frequency of autosomal-recessive disorders in the Ashkenazi Jewish population: should the rationale for mutation choice for screening be reevaluated?, Prenatal Diagnosis 28:236-41.
Faulstich, 1997, A sequencing method for RNA oligonucleotides based on mass spectrometry, Anal Chem 69:4349-4353.
Faust, 2014, SAMBLASTER: fast duplicate marking and structural variant read extraction, Bioinformatics published online May 7, 2014.
Fitch, 1970, Distinguishing homologs from analogous proteins, Syst Biol 19(2):99-113.
Flaschker et al., 2007, Description of the mutations in 15 subjects with variant forms of maple syrup urine disease, J Inherit Metab Dis 30:903-909.
Frey, 2006, Statistics Hacks 108-115.
Friedenson, 2005, BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathways and the Risk of Cancers Other Than Breast or Ovarian, Medscape General Medicine 7(2):60.
Furtado, 2011, Characterization of large genomic deletions in the FBN1 gene using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, BMC Med Gen 12:119-125.
Garber, 2008, Fixing the front end, Nat Biotech 26(10):1101-1104.
Gemayel, 2010, Variable tandem repeats accelerate evolution of coding and regulatory sequences, Ann Rev Genet 44:445-77.
Giusti, 1993, Synthesis and Characterization of f′-Fluorescent-dye-labeled Oligonucleotides, PCR Meth Appl 2:223-227.
Glover, 1995, Sequencing of oligonucleotides using high performance liquid chromatography and electrospray mass spectrometry, Rapid Com Mass Spec 9:897-901.
Gnirke et al., 2009, Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing, nature biotechnology 27:182-9.
Goto, 1994, A Study on Development of a Deductive Object-Oriented Database and Its Application to Genome Analysis, PhD Thesis, Kyushu University, Kyushu, Japan (106 pages).
Goto, 2010, BioRuby: bioinformatics software for the Ruby programming language, Bioinformatics 26(20):2617-2619.
Green, 2005, Suicide polymerase endonuclease restriction, a novel technique for enhancing PCR amplification of minor DNA template, Appl Env Microbiol 71(8):4721-4727.
Guerrero-Fernandez, 2013, FQbin: a compatible and optimize dformat for storing and managing sequence data, IWBBIO Proceedings, Granada 337-344.
Gupta, 1991, A general method for the synthesis of 3′-sulfhydryl and phosphate group containing oligonucleotides, Nuel Acids Res 19(11):3019-3025.
Gustincich et al., 1991, A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood, BioTechniques 11(3):298-302.
Gut, 2995, A procedure for selective DNA alkylation and detection by mass spectrometry, Nucl Acids Res 23(8):1367-1373.
Hallam, 2014, Validation for Clinical Use of, and Initial Clinical Experience with, a Novel Approach to Population-Based Carrier Screening using High-Throughput Next-Generation DNA Sequencing, J Mol Diagn 16:180-9.
Hammond, 1996, Extraction of DNA from preserved animal specimens for use in randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, Anal Biochem 240:298-300.
Hardenbol, 2003, Multiplexed genotyping with sequence-tagged molecular inversion probes, Nat Biotech 21:673-8.
Hardenbol, 2005, Highly multiplexed molecular inversion probe genotyping: over 10,000 targeted SNPs genotyped in a single tube assay, Genome Res 15:269-75.
Harper, 2011, Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: State of the ART 2011, Human Genet 131(2):175-186.
Harris, 2006, Defects can increase the melting temperature of DNA-nanoparticle assemblies, J Phys Chem B 110(33):16393-6.
Harris, 2008, Helicos True Single Molecule Sequencing (tSMS) Science 320:106-109.
Harris, 2008, Single-molecule DNA sequencing of a viral genome, Science 320(5872):106-9.
Heid, 1996, Real time quantitative PCR, Genome Res 6:986-994.
Hiatt, 2013, Single molecule molecular inversion probes for targeted, high-accuracy detection of low-frequency variation, Genome Res 23:843-54.
Hill, 1991, The use of pH indicators to identify suitable environments for freezing samples in aqueous and mixed aqueous/nonaqueous solutions, Anal Biochem 192(2):358-361.
Adey, 2010, Rapid, low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun fragment libraries by high-density in vitro transposition, Genome Biol 11:R119.
Ageno, 1969, The alkaline denaturation of DNA, Biophys J 9(11):1281-1311.
Agrawal, 1990, Site-specific functionalization of oligodeoxynucleotides for non-radioactive labelling, Tetrahedron Let 31:1543-1546.
Akhras, 2007, Connector Inversion Probe Technology: A Powerful OnePrimer Multiplex DNA Amplification System for Numerous Scientific Applications PLOS ONE 2(9):e915.
Alazard, 2002, Sequencing of production-scale synthetic oligonucleotides by enriching for coupling failures using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Anal Biochem 301:57-64.
Alazard 2006, Sequencing oligonucleotides by enrichment of coupling failures using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem, Chapter 10, Unit 10:1-7.
Albert, 2007, Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization, Nature Methods 4(11):903-5.
Aljanabi, 1997, Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques, Nucl. Acids Res 25:4692-4693.
Antonarakis and the Nomenclature Working Group, 1998, Recommendations for a nomenclature system for human gene mutations, Human Mutation 11:1-3.
Archer, 2014, Selective and flexible depletion of problematic sequences from RNA-seq libraries at the cDNA stage, BMC Genomics 15(1):401.
Ball, 2009, Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells, Nat Biotech 27:361-8.
Balzer, 2013, Filtering duplicate reads from 454 pyrosequencing data, Bioinformatics 29(7):830-836.
Barany, 1991, Genetic disease detection and DNA amplification using cloned thermostable ligase, PNAS 88:189-193.
Barany, 1991, The Ligase Chain Reaction in a PCR World, Genome Research 1:5-16.
Bau, 2008, Targeted next-generation sequencing by specific capture of multiple genomic loci using low-volume microfluidic DNA arrays, Analytical and Bioanal Chem 393(1):171-5.
Beer, 1962, Determination of base sequence in nucleic acids with the electron microscope: visibility of a marker, PNAS 48(3):409-416.
Bell, 2011, Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing, Sci Trans Med 3(65ra4).
Benner, 2001, Evolution, language and analogy in functional genomics, Trends Genet 17:414-8.
Bentzley, 1996, Oligonucleotide sequence and composition determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, Anal Chem 68:2141-2146.
Bentzley, 1998, Base specificity of oligonucleotide digestion by calf spleen phosphodiesterase with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization analysis, Anal Biochem 258:31-37.
Bickle, 1993, Biology of DNA Restriction, Microbiol Rev 57(2):434-50.
Bonfield, 2013, Compression of FASTQ and SAM format sequencing data, PLoS One 8(3):e59190.
Bose, 2012, BIND—An algorithm for loss-less compression of nucleotide sequence data, J Biosci 37(4):785-789.
Boyden, 2013, High-throughput screening for SMN1 copy number loss by next-generation sequencing, American Society of Human Genetics 63rd Annual Meeting, Abstract, Oct. 22, 2013.
Boyer, 1971, DNA restriction and modification mechanisms in bacteria, Ann Rev Microbiol 25:153-76.
Braasch, 2001, Locked nucleic acid (LNA): fine-tuning the recognition of DNA and RNA, Chemistry & Biology 8(1):1-7.
Braslavsky, 2003, Sequence information can be obtained from single DNA molecules, PNAS 100:3960-4.
Brinkman, 2004, Splice Variants as Cancer Biomarkers, Clin Biochem 37:584.
Brown et al., 1979, Chemical synthesis and cloning of a tyrosine tRNA gene, Methods Enzymol 68:109-51.
Browne, 2002, Metal ion-catalyzed nucleic Acid alkylation and fragmentation, J Am Chem Soc 124(27):7950-7962.
Brownstein, 2014, An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge, Genome Biol 15:R53.
Bunyan, 2004, Dosage analysis of cancer predisposition genes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, British Journal of Cancer, 91(6):1155-59.
Burrow, 1994, A block-sorting lossless data compression algorithm, Technical Report 124, Digital Equipment Corporation, CA.
Campbell, 1992, Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae by polymerase chain reaction, J Clin Microbiol 30(2):434-439.
Carpenter, 2013, Pulling out the 1%: whole-genome capture for the targeted enrichment of ancient DNA sequencing libraries, Am J Hum Genet 93(5):852-864.
Caruthers, 1985, Gene synthesis machines: DNA chemistry and its uses, Science 230:281-285.
Castellani, 2008, Consenses on the use of and interpretation of cystic fibrosis mutation analysis in clinical practice, J Cyst Fib 7:179-196.
CDC, 2011 Assisted Reproductive Technology: Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report.
Challis, 2012, An integrative variant analysis suite for whole exome next-generation sequencing data, BMC Informatics 13(8):1-12.
Chan, 2011, Natural and engineered nicking endonucleases—from cleavage mechanism to engineering of strand-specificity, Nucl Acids Res 39(1):1-18.
Chen, 2010, Identification of racehorse and sample contamination by novel 24-plex STR system, Forensic Sci Int: Genetics 4:158-167.
Chennagiri, 2013, A generalized scalable database model for storing and exploring genetic variations detected using sequencing data, American Society of Human Genetics 63rd Annual Meeting, Abstract, Oct. 22, 2013.
Chevreux, 1999, Genome sequence assembly using trace signals and additional sequence information, Proc GCB 99:45-56.
Chirgwin et al., 1979, Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease, Biochemistry, 18:5294-99.
Choe, 2010, Novel CFTR Mutations in a Korean Infant with Cystic Fibrosis and Pancreatic Insufficiency, J Korean Med Sci 25:163-5.
Ciotti, 2004, Triplet repeat prmied PCR (TP PCR) in molecular diagnostic testing for Friedrich ataxia, J Mol Diag 6(4):285-9.
Cock, 2010, The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants, Nucleic Acids Res 38(6):1767-1771.
Collins, 2004, Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome, Nature 431(7011):931-45.
Cremers, 1998, Autosomal Recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa and Cone-Rod Dystrophy Caused by Splice Site Mutations in the Stargardt's Disease Gene ABCR, Hum Mol Gen 7(3):355.
Cronin, 1996, Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Detection by Hybridization to Light-Generated DNA Probe Array Human Mutation 7:244.
Wang et al., 2005, Allele quantification using molecular inversion probes (MIP), Nucleic Acids Research 33(21):e183.
Warner, 1996, A general method for the detection of large CAG repeat expansions by fluorescent PCR, J Med Genet 33(12):1022-6.
Warren, 2007, Assembling millions of short DNA sequences using SSAKE, Bioinformatics, 23:500-501.
Waszak, 2010, Systematic inference of copy-number genotypes from personal genome sequencing data reveals extensive olfactory gene content diversity, PLoS Comp Biol 6(11):e1000988.
Watson et al., 2004, Cystic fibrosis population carrier screening: 2004 revision of American College of Medical Genetics mutation panel, Genetics in Medicine 6(5):387-391.
Williams, 2003, Restriction endonucleases classification, properties, and applications, Mol Biotechnol 23(3):225-43.
Wittung, 1997, Extended DNA-Recognition Repertoire of Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA): PNA-dsDNA Triplex Formed with Cytosine-Rich Homopyrimidine PNA, Biochemistry 36:7973.
Wu, 1998, Sequencing regular and labeled oligonucleotides using enzymatic digestion and ionspray mass spectrometry, Anal Biochem 263:129-138.
Wu, 2001, Improved oligonucleotide sequencing by alkaline phosphatase and exonuclease digestions with mass spectrometry, Anal Biochem 290:347-352.
Xu, 2012, FastUniq: A fast de novo duplicates removal tool for paired short reads, PLoS One 7(12):e52249.
Yau, 1996, Accurate diagnosis of carriers of deletions and duplications in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy by fluorescent dosage analysis, J Med Gen 33(7):550-8.
Ye, 2009, Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium size insertions from paired-end short reads, Bioinformatics 25(21):2865-2871.
Yershov, 1996, DNA analysis and diagnostics on oligonucleotide microchips, PNAS 93:4913-4918.
Yoo, 2009, Applications of DNA microarray in disease diagnostics, J Microbiol Biotech19(7):635-46.
Yoon, 2014, MicroDuMIP: target-enrichment technique for microarray-based duplex molecular inversion probes, Nucl Ac Res 43(5):e28.
Yoshida, 2004, Role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 as regulators of DNA repair, transcription, and cell cycle in response to DNA damage, Cancer Science 95(11)866-71.
Yu, 2007, A novel set of DNA methylation markers in urine sediments for sensitive/specific detection of bladder cancer, Clin Cancer Res 13(24):7296-7304.
Yuan, 1981, Structure and mechanism of multifunctional restriction endonucleases, Ann Rev Biochem 50:285-319.
Zerbino, 2008, Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs, Genome Research 18(5):821-829.
Zhang, 2011, Is Mitochondrial tRNAphe Variant m.593T.Ca Synergistically Pathogenic Mutation in Chinese LHON Families with m.11778G.A? PLoS ONE 6(10):e26511.
Zhao, 2009, PGA4genomics for comparative genome assembly based on genetic algorithm optimization, Genomics 94(4):284-6.
Zheng, 2011, iAssembler: a package for de novo assembly of Roche-454/Sanger transcriptome sequences, BMC Bioinformatics 12:453.
Rothberg, 2011, An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing, Nature 475:348-352.
Rowntree, 2003, The phenotypic consequences of CFTR mutations, Ann Hum Gen 67:471-485.
Saihan, 2009, Update on Usher syndrome, Cur Op Neurology 22:19-27.
Sanger, 1977, DNA Sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors, PNAS 74(12):5463-5467.
Santa Lucia, 1998, A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics, PNAS 95(4):1460-5.
Sargent, 1988, Isolation of differentially expressed genes, Methods Enzymol 152:423-432.
Sauro, 2004, How Do You Calculate a Z-Score/ Sigma Level?, https://www.measuringusability.com/zcalc.htm (online publication).
Sauro, 2004, What's a Z-Score and Why Use it in Usability Testing?, https://www.measuringusability.com/z.htm (online publication).
Schadt, 2010, A window into third-generation sequencing, Human Mol Genet 19(R2):R227-40.
Schatz et al., 2010, Assembly of large genomes using second-generation sequencing, Genome Res., 20:1165-1173.
Schiffman, 2009, Molecular inversion probes reveal patterns of 9p21 deletion and copy number aberrations in childhood leukemia, Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 193:9-18.
Zhou, 2014, Bias from removing read duplication in ultra-deep sequencing experiments, Bioinformatics 30(8):1073-1080.
Zimmerman, 2010, A novel custom resequencing array for dilated cardiomyopathy, Gen Med 12(5):268-78.
Zuckerman, 1987, Efficient methods for attachment of thiol specific probes to the 3′-ends of synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Nucl Acid Res 15(13):5305-5321.
Schneeberger, 2011, Reference-guided assembly of four diverse Arabidopsis thaliana genomes, PNAS 108(25):10249-10254.
Schoolcraft, 2010, Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage, Fert Steril 94(5):1700-1706.
Schouten, 2002, Relative Quantification of 40 Nucleic Acid Sequences by Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification, Nude Acids Res 30 (12):257.
Schrijver, 2005, Diagnostic testing by CFTR gene mutation analysis in a large group of Hispanics, J Mol Diag 7(2):289-299.
Schuette, 1995, Sequence analysis of phosphorothioate oligonucleotides via matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, J Pharm Biomed Anal 13:1195-1203.
Schwartz, 2009, Identification of cystic fibrosis variants by polymerase chain reaction/oligonucleotide ligation assay, J Mol Diag 11(3):211-15.
Schwartz, 2011, Clinical utility of single nucleotide polymorphism arrays, Clin Lab Med 31(4):581-94.
Sequeira, 1997, Implementing generic, object-oriented models in biology, Ecological Modeling 94.1:17-31.
Shen, 2013, Multiplex capture with double-stranded DNA probes, Genome Medicine 5(50):1-8.
Sievers, 2011, Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega, Mol Syst Biol 7:539.
Simpson, 2009, ABySS: A parallel assembler for short read sequence data, Genome Res., 19(6):1117-23.
Slater, 2005, Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison, BMC Bioinformatics 6:31.
Smirnov, 1996, Sequencing oligonucleotides by exonuclease digestion and delayed extraction matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Anal Biochem 238:19-25.
Smith, 1985, The synthesis of oligonucleotides containing an aliphatic amino group at the 5′ terminus: synthesis of fluorescent DNA primers for use in DNA sequence analysis, Nucl. Acid Res., 13:2399-2412.
Smith, 2010, Highly-multiplexed barcode sequencing: an efficient method for parallel analysis of pooled samples, Nucleic Acids Research 38(13):e142 (8 pages).
Soni, 2007, Progress toward ultrafast DNA sequencing using solid-state nanopores, Clin Chem 53(11):1996-2001.
Spanu, 2010, Genome expansion and gene loss in powdery mildew fungi reveal tradeoffs in extreme parasitism, Science 330(6010):1543-46.
Sproat, 1987, The synthesis of protected 5′-mercapto-2′,5′-dideoxyribonucleoside-3′-O-phosphoramidites; uses of 5′-mercapto-oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Nucl Acid Res 15:4837-4848.
Strom, 2005, Mutation detection, interpretation, and applications in the clinical laboratory setting, Mutat Res 573:160-67.
Summerer, 2009, Enabling technologies of genomic-scale sequence enrichment for targeted high-throughput sequencing, Genomics 94(6):363-8.
Summerer, 2010, Targeted High Throughput Sequencing of a Cancer-Related Exome Subset by Specific Sequence Capture With a Fully Automated Microarray Platform, Genomics 95(4):241-246.
Sunnucks, 1996, Microsatellite and chromosome evolution of parthenogenetic sitobion aphids in Australia, Genetics 144:747-756.
Tan, 2014, Clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening using next generation sequencing, GigaScience 3(30):1-9.
Thauvin-Robinet, 2009, The very low penetrance of cystic fibrosis for the R117H mutation: a reappraisal for genetic counseling and newborn screening, J Med Genet 46:752-758.
Thiyagarajan, 2006, PathogenMIPer: a tool for the design of molecular inversion probes to detect multiple pathogens, BMC Bioinformatics 7:500.
Thompson, 1994, Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive mulitple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice, Nuc Acids Res 22:4673-80.
Thompson, 2011, The properties and applications of single-molecule DNA sequencing, Genome Biol 12(2):217.
Thorstenson, 1998, An Automated Hydrodynamic Process for Controlled, Unbiased DNA Shearing, Genome Res 8(8):848-855.
Thorvaldsdottir, 2012, Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration, Brief Bioinform 24(2):178-92.
Tkachuk, 1990, Detection of bcr-abl Fusion in Chronic Myelogeneous Leukemia by in Situ Hybridization, Science 250:559.
Tobler, 2005, The SNPlex Genotyping System: A Flexible and Scalable Platform for SNP Genotyping, J Biomol Tech 16(4):398.
Tokino, 1996, Characterization of the human p57 KIP2 gene: alternative splicing, insertion/deletion polymorphisms in VNTR sequences in the coding region, and mutational analysis, Human Genetics 96:625-31.
Turner, 2009, Massively parallel exon capture and library-free resequencing across 16 genomes, Nat Meth 6:315-316.
Turner, 2009, Methods for genomic partitioning, Ann Rev Hum Gen 10:263-284.
Umbarger, 2013, Detecting contamination in Next Generation DNA sequencing libraries, American Society of Human Genetics 63rd Annual Meeting, Abstract, Oct. 22, 2013.
Umbarger, 2014, Next-generation carrier screening, Gen Med 16(2):132-140.
Veeneman, 2012, Oculus: faster sequence alignment by streaming read compression, BMC Bioinformatics 13:297.
Wallace, 1979, Hybridization of synthetic oligodeoxyribonucteotides to dp x 174DNA:the effect of single base pair mismatch, Nucl Acids Res 6:3543-3557.
Wallace, 1987, Oligonucleotide probes for the screening of recombinant DNA libraries, Meth Enz 152:432-442.
Miner, 2004, Molecular barcodes detect redundancy and contamination in hairpin-bisulfite PCR, Nucl Acids Res 32(17):e135.
Minton, 2011, Mutation Surveyor: software for DNA sequence analysis, Meth Mol Biol 688:143-53.
Miyazaki, 2009, Characterization of deletion breakpoints in patients with dystrophinopathy carrying a deletion of exons 45-55 of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) gene, J Hum Gen 54:127-30.
Mockler, 2005, Applications of DNA tiling arrays for whole-genome analysis, Genomics 85(1):1-15.
Mohammed, 2012, DELIMINATE—a fast and efficient methods for loss-less compression of genomice sequences, Bioinformatics 28(19):2527-2529.
Moudrianakis, 1965, Base Sequence Determination in Nucleic Acids with the Electron Microscope, III. Chemistry and Microscopy of Guanine-Labeled DNA, PNAS, 53:564-71.
Mullan, 2002, Multiple sequence alignment—the gateway to further analysis, Brief Bioinform 3(3):303-5.
Munne, 2012, Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy and translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization, Curr Genomics 13(6):463-470.
Nan, 2006, A novel CFTR mutation found in a Chinese patient with cystic fibrosis, Chinese Med J 119(2):103-9.
Narang, 1979, Improved phosphotriester method for the synthesis of gene fragments, Meth Enz 68:90-98.
Nelson, 1989, Bifunctional oligonucleotide probes synthesized using a novel CPG support are able to detect single base pair mutations, Nucl Acids Res 17(18):7187-7194.
Ng, 2009, Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes, Nature 461(7261):272-6.
Nicholas, 2002, Strategies for multiple sequence alignment, Biotechniques 32:572-91.
Nickerson, 1990, Automated DNA diagnostics using an ELISA-based oligonucleotide ligation assay, PNAS 87:8923-7.
Nielsen et al., 1999, Peptide Nucleic Acids, Protocols and Applications (Norfolk: Horizon Scientific Press, 1-19).
Nilsson, 2006, Analyzing genes using closing and replicating circles, Trends in Biotechnology 24:83-8.
Ning, 2001, SSAHA: a fast search method for large DNA databases, Genome Res 11(10):1725-9.
Nordhoff, 1993, Ion stability of nucleic acids in infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization mass spectrometry, Nucl Acid Res 21(15):3347-57.
Nuttle, 2013, Rapid and accurate large-scale genotyping of duplicated genes and discovery of interlocus gene conversions, Nat Meth 10(9):903-909.
Nuttle, 2014, Resolving genomic disorder-associated breakpoints within segmental DNA duplications using massively parallel sequencing, Nat Prot 9(6):1496-1513.
O'Roak, 2012, Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders, Science 338(6114):1619-1622.
Oefner, 1996, Efficient random sub-cloning of DNA sheared in a recirculating point-sink flow system, Nucleic Acids Res 24(20):3879-3886.
Oka, 2006, Detection of loss of heterozygosity in the p53 gene in renal cell carcinoma and bladder cancer using the polymerase chain reaction, Mol Carcinogenesis 4(1):10-13.
Okoniewski, 2013, Precise breakpoint localization of large genomic deletions using PacBio and Illumina next-generation sequencers, Biotechniques 54(2):98-100.
Oliphant, 2002, BeadArray technology: enabling an accurate, cost-effective approach to high-throughput genotyping, Biotechniques Suppl:56-8, 60-1.
Ordahl, 1976, Sheared DNA fragment sizing: comparison of techniques, Nucleic Acids Res 3:2985-2999.
Ostrer, 2001, A genetic profile of contemporary Jewish populations, Nat Rev Genet 2(11):891-8.
Owens, 1998, Aspects of oligonucleotide and peptide sequencing with MALDI and electrospray mass spectrometry, Bioorg Med Chem 6:1547-1554.
Parameswaran, 2007, A pyrosequencing-tailored nucleotide barcode design unveils opportunities for large-scale sample multiplexing, Nucl Acids Rese 35:e130.
Parkinson, 2012, Preparation of high-quality next-generation sequencing libraries from picogram quantities of target DNA, Genome Res 22:125-133.
Pastor, 2010, Conceptual modeling of human genome mutations: a dichotomy between what we have and what we shoudl have, 2010 Proc BIOSTEC Bioinformatics, pp. 160-166.
Paton, 2000, Conceptual modelling of genomic information, Bioinformatics 16(6):548-57.
Pearson, 1988, Improved tools for biological sequence comparison, PNAS 85(8):2444-8.
Pertea et al., 2003, TIGR Gene indices clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets, Bioinformatics 19(5):651-52.
Pertea, 2003, TIGR gene indices clustering tools (TGICL), Bioinformatics 19(5):651-52.
Pieles, 1993, Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry: A powerful tool for the mass and sequence analysis of natural and modified oligonucleotides, Nucleic Acids Res 21:3191-3196.
Pinho, 2013, MFCompress: a compression tool for FASTA and multi-FASTA data, Bioinformatics 30(1):117-8.
Porreca, 2007, Multiplex amplification of large sets of human exons, Nat Meth 4(11):931-936.
Porreca, 2013, Analytical performance of a Next-Generation DNA sequencing-based clinical workflow for genetic carrier screening, American Society of Human Genetics 63rd Annual Meeting, Abstract, Oct. 22, 2013.
Procter, 2006, Molecular diagnosis of Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes by methylation-specific melting analysis and methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, Clin Chem 52(7):1276-83.
Qiagen, 2011, Gentra Puregene handbook, 3d Ed. (72 pages).
Quail et al., 2010, DNA: Mechanical Breakage, Encyclopedia of Life Sciences 2010.
Quail, 2010, DNA: Mechanical Breakage, In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chicester (5 pages).
Rambaut, 1997, Seq-Gen:an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees, Bioinformatics 13:235-38.
Richards, 2008 ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: Revisions, Genet Med 10(4):294-300.
Richter, 2008, MetaSim—A Sequencing Simulator for Genomics and Metagenomics, PLoS ONE 3:e3373.
Roberts, 1980, Restriction and modification enzymes and their recognition sequences, Nucleic Acids Res 8(1):r63-r80.
Robinson et al., 2013, Graph Databases, O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA (223 pages).
Rodriguez, 2010, Constructions from Dots and Lines, Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Tech 36(6):35-41.
Rosendahl et al., 2013, CFTR, SPINK1, CTRC and PRSS1 variants in chronic pancreatitis: is the role of mutated CFTR overestimated?, Gut 62:582-592.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160084854 A1 Mar 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62054725 Sep 2014 US