The present invention relates to utility usage node-to-utility distribution node mapping, and in particular to processes, devices and systems for mapping usage data from a plurality of utility usage nodes, such as electricity usage meters, to at least one utility distribution node, such as a transformer.
Utility companies typically keep records of the electrical connections between individual service delivery points (for example, sockets and electricity meters at homes) and pole- or pad-mounted transformers used to reduce or “transform” the high voltage from the utility down to the 120/240 volt residential service. These records are often inaccurate, sometimes inaccurate more than 50% of the time. In addition, in some cases utility commodities, e.g., electricity, are consumed by non-metered loads, referred to as “non-technical line loss;” often the result of theft.
In addition to theft, such inaccuracies in mapping can result from incorrect wiring in response to an outage and even incorrect wiring or reporting of such wiring at initial installation. For numerous reasons, it is important and would be useful for utility companies to have more accurate mappings. Obviously, theft prevention is critical to customers and the utility companies. Further, in the event of a power outage, knowing exactly which transformer(s) to attend to in order to restore power would greatly reduce down time, as well as utility company employee work time, etc.
Utilities have traditionally performed the transformer-to-meter mapping with field surveys, which are expensive, time consuming, and are generally infrequent so they do not provide continuous data. Such field surveys can actually be conducted by physically following wires from houses to the transformer drums, but the limitations to this method of mapping are fairly obvious. Specifically, the issue is how to determine which house is connected to which transformer and to which phase on the particular transformer.
Such mapping can be attempted with power line carrier meters (i.e., a communications technology that runs over the power line itself) and transformer monitoring. For example, the possibility has been considered of locating a power line carrier communications device at each transformer for the different phases that is connected to meters at various houses. Determining with which meters the communications device can communicate should also indicate to which meters the different phases are connected. However, this solution is generally not economical as it requires the installation of individual monitors at the transformers and meters.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a process that allows for accurate and efficient mapping of meters to pole or pad transformers.
Embodiments of the present invention uses software analytics along with wired or wireless interval metering, without requiring a hard wire connection, in order to more accurately perform transformer-to-meter mapping. For example, using software analytics, the usage can be monitored at each house, and the load can also be monitored on each phase at the transformer. Then, using geographical data, such as the location of houses within a certain distance (e.g., one-half mile) from that transformer, and using a succession of combinations of load profiles from a variety of those houses, the combination of houses that best fits the load profile at the particular transformer can be determined. Further, the present invention facilitates quasi-real-time determination and localization of non-technical line losses.
More particularly, the application of embodiments of the present invention with assumptions and inputs from a multitude of devices on the utility distribution network will provide the utility provider with guidance to make more informed decisions for the use of assets and personnel. For example, there are other kinds of devices that utilities can deploy on the distribution lines in addition to transformer power monitors, such as line current monitors. Additionally, voltage information can be obtained using voltage monitors on the lines or on transformers and at houses, and voltage information can be used to determine which house is connected to which phase on which transformer. Embodiments of the present invention can be used for determining distribution phase load allocation and switched circuit status. Embodiments of the invention will provide utilities with better knowledge of the assets within a geographic region between the substation to the meters and better location for where resources need to be dispatched for work.
Embodiments of the present invention contemplate the use of interval data obtained through economical wireless solutions allowing frequent, reliable correlation and mapping between meters and transformers. It also allows quick and accurate determination of non-technical line losses associated with specific transformers by identifying unallocated consumption. This application of data can then further enhance the analysis for other utility distribution system equipment and configuration status.
Embodiments of the invention utilize, for example, computer hardware, operating systems, programming languages, software applications, and other technology to provide processes, devices and systems for mapping usage data from a plurality of utility usage nodes to at least one utility distribution node that involves, for example, collecting, at a collection device, utility usage data from the plurality of utility usage nodes at predetermined intervals, collecting, at the collection device, utility distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node at the predetermined intervals, and determining, using a computer, which of the plurality of utility usage nodes is connected to the at least one utility distribution node by comparing aggregate usage data from one or more of the plurality of utility usage nodes to distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node during at least one same predetermined interval.
In one aspect, the plurality of utility usage nodes for embodiments of the invention comprises, for example, a plurality of electricity usage nodes, a plurality of water usage nodes, or a plurality of gas usage nodes. In another aspect, the predetermined intervals for embodiments of the invention comprise predetermined intervals of at least one minute, predetermined intervals of up to one hour, or predetermined intervals of between at least one minute and up to one hour. In a further aspect, the plurality of utility usage nodes for embodiments of the invention comprises a plurality of electricity usage meters.
In an additional aspect of embodiments of the invention, collecting, at the collection device, the utility usage data from the plurality of utility usage nodes further comprises collecting, at the collection device, the utility usage data from the plurality of utility usage meters over a wireless network. In a still further aspect, collecting, at the collection device, the utility usage data from the plurality of utility usage nodes further comprises collecting, at the collection device, the utility usage data from the plurality of utility usage meters over a wired network. In still another aspect, the plurality of utility usage meters are time synchronized with one another.
In another aspect, the at least one utility distribution node for embodiments of the invention comprises at least one electricity distribution node, at least one water distribution node, or at least one gas distribution node. In still another aspect, the at least one utility distribution node for embodiments of the invention comprises at least one transformer, and the at least one transformer can further comprise at least one transformer load meter. In an additional aspect for embodiments of the invention, collecting, at the collection device, utility distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node further comprises collecting, at the collection device, load meter data from the at least one transformer load meter over a wireless network.
In a further aspect for embodiments of the invention, collecting, at the collection device, utility distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node further comprises collecting, at the collection device, load meter data from the at least one transformer load meter over a wired network. In a still further aspect, the plurality of utility usage nodes for embodiments of the invention further comprise a plurality of electricity usage meters that are time synchronized with one another and also synchronized with the at least one transformer load meter. In another aspect, the at least one utility distribution node for embodiments of the invention further comprises at least one of a substation bank, a circuit breaker, a line capacitor, a circuit recloser, or a circuit switch.
According to an aspect for embodiments of the invention, determining which of the plurality of utility usage nodes is connected to the at least one utility distribution node further comprises determining that all of the plurality of utility usage nodes are connected to the at least one utility distribution node when utility usage according to the aggregate usage data from all of the plurality of utility usage nodes is substantially equal to utility distribution according to the distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node during the at least one same predetermined interval.
According to another aspect for embodiments of the invention, determining which of the plurality of utility usage nodes is connected to the at least one utility distribution node further comprises determining that a condition of unallocated consumption exists for the at least one utility distribution node when utility usage according to the aggregate usage data from all of the plurality of utility usage nodes is less than the utility distribution according to the distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node during the at least one same predetermined interval.
In a further aspect for embodiments of the invention, determining that a condition of unallocated consumption exists further comprises determining that a non-technical line loss exists for the at least one utility distribution node when utility usage according to the aggregate usage data from all of the plurality of utility usage nodes is less than the utility distribution according to the distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node during the at least one same predetermined interval.
In an additional aspect for embodiments of the invention, determining that a condition of unallocated consumption exists further comprises determining that at least one additional utility usage node is connected to the at least one utility distribution node when the utility usage according to the aggregate usage data from all of the plurality of utility usage nodes is less than the utility distribution according to the distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node during the at least one same predetermined interval.
In another aspect for embodiments of the invention, determining that at least one additional utility usage node is connected to the at least one utility distribution node further comprises identifying the at least one additional node by comparing utility usage according to usage data from said at least one additional utility usage node to an amount by which the utility usage according to the aggregate usage data from the plurality of utility usage nodes is less than the utility distribution according to the distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node during the at least one same predetermined interval.
In still another aspect for embodiments of the invention, determining which of the plurality of utility usage nodes is connected to the at least one utility distribution node further comprises determining that less than all of the plurality of utility usage nodes are connected to the at least one utility distribution node when utility usage according to the aggregate usage data from all of the plurality of utility usage nodes exceeds the utility distribution according to the distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node during the at least one same predetermined interval.
In a still further aspect for embodiments of the invention, determining that less than all of the plurality of utility usage nodes are connected to the at least one utility distribution node further comprises identifying at least one of the plurality of utility usage nodes that is not connected to the at least one utility distribution node by comparing utility usage according to usage data from said at least one of the plurality of utility usage nodes to an amount by which utility according to the aggregate usage data from all of the plurality of utility usage nodes exceeds utility distribution according to the distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node during the at least one same predetermined interval.
Other aspects for embodiments of the invention provide, for example, a machine for mapping usage data from a plurality of utility usage nodes to at least one utility distribution node comprising a microprocessor coupled to a memory, wherein the microprocessor is programmed to receive utility usage data collected, at a collection device, from the plurality of utility usage nodes at predetermined intervals, to receive utility distribution data collected, at the collection device, from the at least one utility distribution node at the predetermined intervals, and to determine which of the plurality of utility usage nodes is connected to the at least one utility distribution node by comparing aggregate usage data from one or more of the plurality of utility usage nodes to distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node during at least one same predetermined interval.
Still other aspects for embodiments of the invention provide, for example, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium with an executable program stored therein, wherein the program instructs a microprocessor to perform the steps of receiving utility usage data collected, at a collection device, from the plurality of utility usage nodes at predetermined intervals, receiving utility distribution data collected, at the collection device, from the at least one utility distribution node at the predetermined intervals, and determining which of the plurality of utility usage nodes is connected to the at least one utility distribution node by comparing aggregate usage data from one or more of the plurality of utility usage nodes to distribution data from the at least one utility distribution node during at least one same predetermined interval.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Various aspects of the embodiments will now be described. The following description provides specific details for a thorough understanding and enabling description of these examples. Many of these specific details are optional. One skilled in the art will understand, however, that the invention and its various embodiments may be practiced without many of these specific details and options. Additionally, some well-known structures or functions may not be shown or described in detail, so as to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the relevant description.
The terminology used in the description presented below is intended to be interpreted in its broadest reasonable manner, even though it is being used in conjunction with a detailed description of certain specific examples. Certain terms may even be emphasized below; however, any terminology intended to be interpreted in any restricted manner will be overtly and specifically defined as such in this detailed description section. Aspects, features, and elements of the invention and of embodiments of the invention are described throughout the written description and the drawings and claims.
Embodiments of the invention provide a process, device and system of analyzing interval energy consumption data from electricity meters and transformer meters to determine the meter-to-transformer mapping. For example, referring to
The mapping for embodiments of the invention is possible not only at the single phase level, but down to three phases as well. For example, assume there are three phases on the transformer and power consumption on each of the three phases on the transformer. Instead of five house meters per transformer as in the foregoing example, there are five house meters per phase on the transformer. Thus, the process of mapping the transformer to the meters involves matching three groups of five house meters to corresponding ones of the three phases on the particular transformer.
Once an initial map is established for embodiments of the invention, the continuous data pulls and/or pushes and comparisons will allow for quick issue spotting. For example, if it is determined that Customers 1 through 5 are indeed correctly mapped to Transformer A, and, over a fixed time period, the combined load from Customer meters 1 through 5 does not match with the Transformer A load over the same fixed time period, then the utility company will be alerted that there might be an issue. The discrepancy could result from a tree touching a wire, an improper connection to or disconnection from a meter after an outage or other maintenance. The discrepancy could be the result of theft. Regardless of the source of the discrepancy, due to the quasi real-time mapping resulting from the present invention, the utility company can be alerted to a potential issue at a remote location.
It is to be understood that although the plurality of utility usage nodes and the utility distribution node for illustrative embodiments of the invention comprise, respectively, a plurality of electricity usage nodes consisting, for example, of a plurality of electricity usage meters, and an electricity distribution node, such as a transformer with a transformer load meter, the plurality of utility usage nodes and the utility distribution node may likewise comprise any other type of utility nodes such as water usage and distribution nodes or gas usage and distribution nodes. Further, the utility usage data may be collected from the plurality of electricity usage meters and the transformer load meter over a wireless network or over a wired network. In any event, a key aspect of embodiments of the invention is that the utility usage meters are time synchronized with one another and with the transformer load meter.
It is also to be understood that while the interval shown for the interval data in
Referring further to
As previously, noted, the condition of unallocated consumption can be attributed to a non-technical line loss (i.e. theft) or alternatively the condition of unallocated consumption can be attributed to the existence of one or more additional utility usage nodes connected to the distribution node. An aspect of embodiments of the invention involves identifying the additional node by comparing utility usage according to usage data from the additional utility usage node to an amount by which the utility usage according to the aggregate usage data from the plurality of utility usage nodes is less than the utility distribution according to the distribution data from the utility distribution node during the same predetermined interval or intervals.
Referring again to
The knowledge of transformer load in conjunction with individual customer load data will facilitate connection decisions and changes when, for example, certain customers suddenly do have or are expected to have increased load requirements. The transformers have limited capacity and as the need or desire to use electric power increases, e.g., for electric cars, utility companies will need to rearrange connections to re-distribute loads and avoid outages or plan for transformer upgrades. Embodiments of the present invention provide a mapping and information solution that gives utility companies the ability to manage loads and equipment and to provide electric services more efficiently and effectively.
In a preferred embodiment, the present invention is implemented using data from wireless meters to pull back the interval data wirelessly from the customer meters as well as the transformer meters. These devices must have relatively accurate (better than a few minutes) time synchronization to enable accurate correlation of the interval data from the various meters. Identically assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/275,242 entitled “Collector Device and System Utilizing Standardized Utility Metering Protocol” details various exemplary embodiments for facilitating the pull or push of use data from or to meter nodes. The entirety of this application is incorporated herein by reference.
The simplified example described herein could be expanded in operation, wherein an algorithm implemented on an appropriate processor or processors takes into account the physical proximity of numerous meters to a particular transformer—for example looking at the 100 closest meters to a transformer—to determine which of those meters must be connected to the transformer to create the measured load profile (i.e., trying different combinations of the 100 closest meters until the closest match to the measured load profile is determined). This operation can be performed on demand or as part of a continuous monitoring process. The operation can be utilized as part of a baseline mapping process and/or as part of a mapping validation or map database updating process.
In a similar fashion, customer interval meter data that has been related to a transformer can be further aggregated by assumed phase connections of the transformers up to a common measurement point (i.e. substation bank, circuit breaker, line capacitor, circuit recloser, circuit switch, or any other phase connected device equipped with measurement equipment). For example, all of the customer interval meter data could be further aggregated and compared to the outflow from a substation to determine where gaps of losses may exist. The transformer loads and then the house meters should sum up to the electricity that leaves the substation and if not, a loss exists which can then be isolated. In this manner, the utility can diagnose where equipment may have been incorrectly connected (or reconnected after a storm restoration) to the distribution phase to which the load was originally allocated. By providing guidance, the utility field crews can more efficiently and effectively balance the phase loading of the circuit. A balanced distribution circuit then results in more efficient operation, lower system losses, and lower neutral current that may lead to stray voltage or “tingle” shock.
Finally, many utilities make regular movement of portions of the distribution circuit to other circuits, to other substations, and in some cases to other utilities by opening and closing switching points. With the afore described correlation of synchronized interval data for embodiments of the invention, utilities will use a common measurement point (i.e. substation bank, circuit breaker, line capacitor, circuit recloser, circuit switch, or any other phase-connected device equipped with measurement equipment) and the data from all meter points on the switched portion of a circuit to interpolate whether the portion of the circuit has been switched back, remains switched, or is shared between both circuits. Sharing the circuits may be unintentional and could lead to a catastrophic failure of equipment under certain circumstances and subject personnel to hazards if the system is assumed to be switched.
As data is aggregated higher into the utility system from meter up to substation, the fidelity of the analysis may become questionable. However, embodiments of the present invention, using assumptions and inputs from a multitude of devices as described on the distribution network, will provide the utility with guidance to make more informed decisions for the use of assets and personnel. Embodiments of the current invention enable a utility company to map power connections at the most basic level, i.e., pole or pad transformer. Embodiments of this invention will provide utilities with better knowledge of the assets within a geographic region between the substation to the meters.
The words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above detailed description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed description of embodiments of the invention is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. Further any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations may employ differing values or ranges. The teachings of the invention provided herein can be applied to other processes, devices and systems, not necessarily the processes, devices and systems described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
While the above detailed description describes certain embodiments of the invention, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the invention can be practiced in many ways. Details of the processes, devices and systems may vary considerably in their implementation details, while still being encompassed by the invention disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the invention should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the invention with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above detailed description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the invention encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the invention under the claims.
This application claims priority to co-pending U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/159,202 filed Mar. 11, 2009 entitled “PROCESS FOR MAPPING TRANSFORMERS TO METERS AND LOCATING NON-TECHNICAL LINE LOSSES”, which is incorporated herein by this reference. This application hereby references and incorporates by reference in its entirety U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/275,242 entitled “COLLECTOR DEVICE AND SYSTEM UTILIZING STANDARDIZED UTILITY METERING PROTOCOL”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4132981 | White | Jan 1979 | A |
4190800 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4204195 | Bogacki | May 1980 | A |
4254472 | Juengel et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4322842 | Martinez | Mar 1982 | A |
4396915 | Farnsworth et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4425628 | Bedard et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4638314 | Keller | Jan 1987 | A |
4644320 | Carr et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4749992 | Fitzemeyer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4792946 | Mayo | Dec 1988 | A |
4939726 | Flammer et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5007052 | Flammer | Apr 1991 | A |
5056107 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5077753 | Grau, Jr. et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5079768 | Flammer | Jan 1992 | A |
5115433 | Baran et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117422 | Hauptschein et al. | May 1992 | A |
5130987 | Flammer | Jul 1992 | A |
5138615 | Lamport et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5159592 | Perkins | Oct 1992 | A |
5216623 | Barrett et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5276680 | Messenger | Jan 1994 | A |
5311581 | Merriam et al. | May 1994 | A |
5400338 | Flammer, III et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5430729 | Rahnema | Jul 1995 | A |
5432507 | Mussino et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5453977 | Flammer, III et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459727 | Vannucci | Oct 1995 | A |
5463777 | Bialkowski et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465398 | Flammer | Nov 1995 | A |
5467345 | Cutler, Jr. et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471469 | Flammer, III et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479400 | Dilworth et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5488608 | Flammer, III | Jan 1996 | A |
5515369 | Flammer, III et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515509 | Rom | May 1996 | A |
5528507 | McNamara et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544036 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553094 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5570084 | Retter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572528 | Shuen | Nov 1996 | A |
5596722 | Rahnema | Jan 1997 | A |
5608721 | Natarajan et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608780 | Gerszberg et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623495 | Eng et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5659300 | Dresselhuys et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5673252 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5696501 | Ouellette et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717718 | Rowsell et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719564 | Sears | Feb 1998 | A |
5726644 | Jednacz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727057 | Emery et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737318 | Melnik | Apr 1998 | A |
5740366 | Mahany et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748104 | Argyroudis et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757783 | Eng et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758331 | Johnson | May 1998 | A |
5761083 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767790 | Jovellana | Jun 1998 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5812531 | Cheung et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822309 | Ayanoglu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844893 | Gollnick et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5874903 | Shuey et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880677 | Lestician | Mar 1999 | A |
5892758 | Argyroudis | Apr 1999 | A |
5894422 | Chasek | Apr 1999 | A |
5896097 | Cardozo | Apr 1999 | A |
5898387 | Davis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898826 | Pierce et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901067 | Kao et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903566 | Flammer, III | May 1999 | A |
5914672 | Glorioso et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914673 | Jennings et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920697 | Masters et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926531 | Petite | Jul 1999 | A |
5933092 | Ouellette et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953371 | Rowsell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963146 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963457 | Kanoi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974236 | Sherman | Oct 1999 | A |
5986574 | Colton | Nov 1999 | A |
5987011 | Toh | Nov 1999 | A |
5991806 | McHann, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014089 | Tracy et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018659 | Ayyagari et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026133 | Sokoler | Feb 2000 | A |
6028522 | Petite | Feb 2000 | A |
6044062 | Brownrigg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058355 | Ahmed et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061609 | Kanoi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073169 | Shuey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075777 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078785 | Bush | Jun 2000 | A |
6084867 | Meier | Jul 2000 | A |
6088659 | Kelley et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097703 | Larsen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108699 | Moiin | Aug 2000 | A |
6118269 | Davis | Sep 2000 | A |
6122603 | Budike, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124806 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134587 | Okanoue | Oct 2000 | A |
6137423 | Glorioso et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150955 | Tracy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6169979 | Johnson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172616 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195018 | Ragle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6218953 | Petite | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233327 | Petite | May 2001 | B1 |
6239722 | Colton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240080 | Okanoue et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246677 | Nap et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246689 | Shavitt | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249516 | Brownrigg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6298053 | Flammer, III et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300881 | Yee et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304556 | Haas | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311105 | Budike, Jr. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338087 | Okanoue | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6362745 | Davis | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363057 | Ardalan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366217 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369719 | Tracy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369769 | Nap et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373399 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396839 | Ardalan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400949 | Bielefeld et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407991 | Meier | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415330 | Okanoue | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430268 | Petite | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437692 | Petite et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457054 | Bakshi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480497 | Flammer, III et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480505 | Johansson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492910 | Ragle et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509841 | Colton et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522974 | Sitton | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535498 | Larsson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538577 | Ehrke et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553355 | Arnoux et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577671 | Vimpari | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6606708 | Devine et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618578 | Petite | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618772 | Kao et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628764 | Petite | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633823 | Bartone et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6636894 | Short et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650249 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653945 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657552 | Belski et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665620 | Burns et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671635 | Forth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681110 | Crookham et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681154 | Nierlich et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684245 | Shuey et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691173 | Morris et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697331 | Riihinen et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6710721 | Holowick | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711166 | Amir et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711409 | Zavgren, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714787 | Reed et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718137 | Chin | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725281 | Zintel et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728514 | Bandeira et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747557 | Petite et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6747981 | Ardalan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751445 | Kasperkovitz et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751455 | Acampora | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751672 | Khalil et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772052 | Amundsen et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775258 | van Valkenburg et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778099 | Mayer et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785592 | Smith et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6798352 | Holowick | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801865 | Gilgenbach et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6826620 | Mawhinney et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829216 | Nakata | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6829347 | Odiaka | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831921 | Higgins | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836737 | Petite et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839775 | Kao et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6842706 | Baraty | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6845091 | Ogier et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859186 | Lizalek et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865185 | Patel et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6885309 | Van Heteren | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891838 | Petite et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6900738 | Crichlow | May 2005 | B2 |
6904025 | Madour et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6904385 | Budike, Jr. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6909705 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6914533 | Petite | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6914893 | Petite | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6946972 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954814 | Leach | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6963285 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967452 | Aiso et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970434 | Mahany et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970771 | Preiss et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975613 | Johansson | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980973 | Karpenko | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982651 | Fischer | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985087 | Soliman | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995666 | Luttrell | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6999441 | Flammer, III et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009379 | Ramirez | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7009493 | Howard et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010363 | Donnelly et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016336 | Sorensen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020701 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7042368 | Patterson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046682 | Carpenter et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053767 | Petite et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054271 | Brownrigg et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062361 | Lane | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7064679 | Ehrke et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072945 | Nieminen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7079810 | Petite et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089089 | Cumming et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102533 | Kim | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103511 | Petite | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7106044 | Lee, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7119713 | Shuey et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126494 | Ardalan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135850 | Ramirez | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135956 | Bartone et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137550 | Petite | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143204 | Kao et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7145474 | Shuey et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7170425 | Christopher et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185131 | Leach | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188003 | Ransom et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197046 | Hariharasubrahmanian | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200633 | Sekiguchi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209840 | Petite et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215926 | Corbett et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222111 | Budike, Jr. | May 2007 | B1 |
7230544 | Van Heteren | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7231482 | Leach | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248181 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248861 | Lazaridis et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250874 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251570 | Hancock et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263073 | Petite et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271735 | Rogai | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274305 | Luttrell | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7274975 | Miller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277027 | Ehrke et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7277967 | Kao et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289887 | Rodgers | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295128 | Petite | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301476 | Shuey et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304587 | Boaz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308370 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312721 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315257 | Patterson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7317404 | Cumeralto et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321316 | Hancock et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324453 | Wu et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7327998 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346463 | Petite et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348769 | Ramirez | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349766 | Rodgers | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362709 | Hui et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7366113 | Chandra et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7379981 | Elliott et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7397907 | Petite | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406298 | Luglio et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7411964 | Suemura | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427927 | Borleske et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444640 | Partanen | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451019 | Rodgers | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457273 | Nakanishi et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468661 | Petite et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7487282 | Leach | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7495578 | Borleske | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498873 | Opshaug et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505453 | Carpenter et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512234 | McDonnell et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515571 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7516106 | Ehlers et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522540 | Maufer | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7522639 | Katz | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7539151 | Demirhan et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7545285 | Shuey et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548826 | Witter et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548907 | Wall et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554941 | Ratiu et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7562024 | Brooks et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7586420 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599665 | Sinivaara | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7602747 | Maksymczuk et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609673 | Bergenlid et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613147 | Bergenlid et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623043 | Mizra et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7626967 | Yarvis et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650425 | Davis et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7676231 | Demirhan et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680041 | Johansen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7729496 | Hacigumus | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756538 | Bonta et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7814322 | Gurevich et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7847706 | Ross et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
8140667 | Keyghobad et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010005368 | Rune | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010038342 | Foote | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046879 | Schramm et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012358 | Sato | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013679 | Petite | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031101 | Petite et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020066095 | Yu | May 2002 | A1 |
20020110118 | Foley | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120569 | Day | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020174354 | Bel et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186619 | Reeves et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001640 | Lao et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030001754 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033394 | Stine | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037268 | Kistler | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050737 | Osann | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030112822 | Hong et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117966 | Chen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030122686 | Ehrke et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030123481 | Neale et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156715 | Reeds, III et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163224 | Klaar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233201 | Horst et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008663 | Srikrishna et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040031030 | Kidder et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034773 | Balabine et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056775 | Crookham et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066310 | Ehrke et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077341 | Chandranmenon et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082203 | Logvinov et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100953 | Chen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113810 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117788 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125776 | Haugli et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138787 | Ransom et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140908 | Gladwin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157613 | Steer et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183687 | Petite et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185845 | Abhishek et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210544 | Shuey et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050026569 | Lim et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027859 | Alvisi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030968 | Rich et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033967 | Morino et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055432 | Rodgers | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058144 | Ayyagari et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065742 | Rodgers | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050122944 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136972 | Smith et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172024 | Cheifot et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050201397 | Petite | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050243867 | Petite | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251403 | Shuey | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257215 | Denby et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050270173 | Boaz | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276243 | Sugaya et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286440 | Strutt et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060028355 | Patterson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060055432 | Shimokawa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056363 | Ratiu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056368 | Ratiu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077906 | Maegawa et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087993 | Sengupta et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098576 | Brownrigg et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098604 | Flammer, III et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111111 | Ovadia | May 2006 | A1 |
20060140135 | Bonta et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146717 | Conner et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060158347 | Roche et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161310 | Lal | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167784 | Hoffberg | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184288 | Rodgers | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060215583 | Castagnoli | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215673 | Olvera-Hernandez | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217936 | Mason et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230276 | Nochta | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271244 | Cumming et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271678 | Jessup et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070001868 | Boaz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013547 | Boaz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019598 | Prehofer | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036353 | Reznik et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070057767 | Sun et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060147 | Shin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063868 | Borleske | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070085700 | Walters et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070087756 | Hoffberg | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103324 | Kosuge et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109121 | Cohen | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110024 | Meier | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120705 | Kiiskila et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136817 | Nguyen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139220 | Mirza et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143046 | Budike, Jr. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147268 | Kelley et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070169074 | Koo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169075 | Lill et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169080 | Friedman | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177538 | Christensen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070177576 | Johansen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070177613 | Shorty et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189249 | Gurevich et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200729 | Borleske et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201504 | Christensen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204009 | Shorty et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205915 | Shuey et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070206503 | Gong et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070206521 | Osaje | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070207811 | Das et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070210933 | Leach | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211636 | Bellur et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239477 | Budike, Jr. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248047 | Shorty et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257813 | Vaswani et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258508 | Werb et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263647 | Shorty et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265947 | Schimpf et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266429 | Ginter et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271006 | Golden et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276547 | Miller | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080018492 | Ehrke et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024320 | Ehrke et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031145 | Ethier et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080032703 | Krumm et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037569 | Werb et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042874 | Rogai | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046388 | Budike, Jr. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048883 | Boaz | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051036 | Vaswani et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063205 | Braskich et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068217 | Van Wyk et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068994 | Garrison et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068996 | Clave et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086560 | Monier et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089314 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095221 | Picard | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097782 | Budike, Jr. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080107034 | Jetcheva et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117110 | Luglio et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129538 | Vaswani et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130535 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130562 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080132185 | Elliott et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136667 | Vaswani et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151795 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151824 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151825 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151826 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151827 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154396 | Shorty et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159213 | Shorty et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165712 | Shorty et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170511 | Shorty et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177678 | Di Martini et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180274 | Cumeralto et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181133 | Thubert et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183339 | Vaswani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186202 | Vaswani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080186203 | Vaswani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080187001 | Vaswani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080187116 | Reeves et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080189415 | Vaswani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080189436 | Vaswani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204272 | Ehrke et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205355 | Liu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080224891 | Ehrke et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225737 | Gong et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238714 | Ehrke et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080238716 | Ehrke et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272934 | Wang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310311 | Flammer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310377 | Flammer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317047 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003214 | Vaswani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090003232 | Vaswani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090003243 | Vaswani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090003356 | Vaswani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010178 | Tekippe | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034418 | Flammer, III et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090034419 | Flammer, III et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090034432 | Bonta et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043911 | Flammer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046732 | Pratt, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055032 | Rodgers | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090068947 | Petite | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077405 | Johansen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079584 | Grady et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082888 | Johansen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096605 | Petite et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102737 | Birnbaum et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090115626 | Vaswani et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090134969 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135716 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135843 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090161594 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167547 | Gilbert | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090168846 | Filippo, III et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175238 | Jetcheva et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179771 | Seal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090235246 | Seal et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090243840 | Petite et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090245270 | van Greunen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262642 | van Greunen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267792 | Crichlow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285124 | Aguirre et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303972 | Flammer, III et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315699 | Satish et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319672 | Reisman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320073 | Reisman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100037069 | Deierling et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037293 | St. Johns et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100040042 | van Greunen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060259 | Vaswani et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061350 | Flammer, III | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073193 | Flammer, III | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074176 | Flammer, III et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074304 | Flammer, III | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110176433 | Monogioudis | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 578 041 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0 663 746 | Jan 2003 | EP |
0 812 502 | Aug 2004 | EP |
0 740 873 | Dec 2005 | EP |
10-070774 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-135965 | May 1998 | JP |
WO 9512942 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9610307 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9610307 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 0054237 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0126334 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0155865 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 03015452 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2005091303 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006059195 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007015822 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007132473 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008027457 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033287 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033514 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008038072 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008092268 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2009067251 | May 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100231413 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61159202 | Mar 2009 | US |