The process industry employs process variable transmitters to monitor process variables associated with substances such as solids, slurries, liquids, vapors, and gases in chemical, pulp, petroleum, pharmaceutical, food, and other fluid processing plants. Process variables include pressure, temperature, flow, level, turbidity, density, concentration, chemical composition, and other properties.
A process fluid temperature transmitter provides an output related to a process fluid temperature. The temperature transmitter output can be communicated over a process control loop to a control room, or the output can be communicated to another process device such that the process can be monitored and controlled.
Traditionally, process fluid temperature transmitters were coupled to or employed thermowells which thermally couple a temperature sensor to a process fluid, but otherwise protect and isolate the temperature sensor from direct contact with the process fluid. The thermowell is positioned within the process fluid in order to ensure substantial thermal contact between the process fluid and the temperature sensor disposed therein.
Thermowells are typically designed using relatively robust metal structures such that the thermowell can withstand a number of challenges provided by the process fluid. Such challenges can include physical challenges, such as process fluid flowing past the thermowell at a relatively high rate; thermal challenges, such as extremely high temperatures; pressure challenges, such as process fluid being conveyed or stored at a high pressure; and chemical challenges, such as those provided by a caustic process fluid.
There are a number of factors that increase the difficulty of working with thermowells in process fluid measurement systems. One issue is that thermowells are intrusive and invasive to the process fluid system. This is because the thermowell must extend through a wall of a process fluid conduit, such as a pipe, in order to couple a temperature sensor to the process fluid. Additionally, thermowells typically require regular evaluation for many related factors. Further, thermowells generally increase the response time for temperature measurement.
Thermowells are used in a number of environments for a variety of reasons. Thermowells provide a robust and effective conduit to allow a temperature sensor to be placed in thermal communication with a process fluid. Additionally, thermowells provide protection for the sensor capsule from materials flowing in the process fluid conduit that could easily bend, break, or erode the temperature sensor capsule. Moreover, thermowells allow the temperature capsule to be easily removed for calibration and replacement without having to shut down the process.
A process fluid temperature measurement system includes a thermowell configured to couple to a process fluid conduit and extend through a wall of the process fluid conduit. A temperature sensor assembly is disposed within the thermowell and includes a first temperature sensitive element and a second temperature sensitive element. The first temperature sensitive element is disposed within the thermowell adjacent a distal end of the thermowell. The second temperature sensitive element is spaced apart from the first temperature sensitive element along a spacer having a known thermal conductivity. Transmitter circuitry is coupled to the first and second temperature sensitive elements and is configured to perform a heat flux calculation to provide a process fluid temperature output.
One design consideration for using thermowells in process fluid measurement systems is that the thermowells should generally be inserted into the process fluid with a length that is approximately one third of the pipe diameter in order to achieve the highest accuracy. The main reason for this design consideration is to reduce or minimize the influence on the temperature sensor element from the process fluid conduit temperature. Additionally, to achieve the desired insertion depth for large pipe diameters, longer thermal wells are needed. However, factors such as vortex shedding, material impacts, and water hammering become a larger concern in the strength of the thermowell. With this and other design considerations in mind, users typically require thermowell lengths specified with millimeter resolution thereby requiring manufactures of thermowells to maintain significant inventory in the various possible lengths of thermowells. Thermowells are typically made robust using a significant amount of material. While such robust designs improve thermowell longevity, they can slow the thermowell's responsiveness to a process temperature change. In some applications, a fast-changing temperature relates to a fault in the process such as a reaction runaway. In this case, it is very important to understand as soon as is feasible that this is occurring so that materials can be added to the process to slow the reaction. Accordingly, at least some embodiments described herein may reduce response time.
The output from process fluid temperature measurement system can be provided over a process communication loop, such as a 4-20 milliamp loop, or provided digitally, such as in accordance with the Highway Addressable Report Transducer (HART®). Other examples of process communication protocols include the Profibus-PA Communication Protocol and the FOUNDATION™ Fieldbus Protocol. Further still, suitable wireless technologies can be used in addition to or in place of a wired process communication protocol. One example of a suitable wireless process communication protocol is that in accordance with the WirelessHART standard (IEC 62591).
As shown in
Communication module 324 allows the temperature measurement system to communicate the process fluid temperature output over a process communication loop. As set forth above, suitable examples of process communication loop protocols include the 4-20 milliamp protocol, HART®, FOUNDATION™ Fieldbus Protocol, and WirelessHART (IEC 62591). Process fluid temperature measurement system 300 also includes power supply module 326 that provides power to all components of the system as indicated at arrow 328. In embodiments where the process fluid temperature measurement system is coupled to a wired process communication loop, such as a HART® loop, or a FOUNDATION™ Fieldbus process communication segment, power module 326 may include suitable circuitry to condition power received from the loop to operate the various components of system 300. Accordingly, in such wired process communication loop embodiments, power supply module 326 may provide suitable power conditioning to allow the entire device to be powered by the loop to which it is coupled. In other embodiments, when wireless process communication is used, power supply module 326 may include a source of power, such as a battery and suitable conditioning circuitry.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, while the heat flux measurement embodiment described with respect to
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3724267 | Zoschak | Apr 1973 | A |
4186605 | Bourigault | Feb 1980 | A |
4384793 | O'Brien | May 1983 | A |
4436438 | Voznick | Mar 1984 | A |
4467134 | Pustell | Aug 1984 | A |
4488516 | Bueters | Dec 1984 | A |
4527908 | Arisi | Jul 1985 | A |
4722610 | Levert | Feb 1988 | A |
4826540 | Mele | May 1989 | A |
5064604 | Barton | Nov 1991 | A |
5743646 | O'Connell | Apr 1998 | A |
6485174 | Albrecht | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503221 | Briggs | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6824305 | Boyd | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6848373 | Breen | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7220050 | Esprimont | May 2007 | B2 |
7249883 | Kuroda | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249885 | Van Den Ende | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7395173 | Kautz | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7789554 | Sattler | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8057093 | Sattler | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092085 | Kawase | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8280674 | Schwerer | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8308349 | Feller | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8591102 | Frach | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8671890 | Davidson | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8851744 | Feller | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8851745 | Sakami | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9360377 | Converse | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20050038172 | Nimberger | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060050767 | Fleming | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080083446 | Chakraborty | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090110023 | Clark, Jr. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100246630 | Kaszynski | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100316086 | Engelstad | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120128024 | Tsuchida | May 2012 | A1 |
20160097684 | Funahashi | Apr 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203432706 | Feb 2014 | CN |
4101549 | Jul 1992 | DE |
102010030076 | Dec 2011 | DE |
2500034 | Jun 2013 | DE |
1079219 | Feb 2001 | EP |
2500034 | Sep 2013 | GB |
WO 9114161 | Sep 1991 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/037222, dated Sep. 8, 2017, 15 pages. |
“Rosemount 0085 Pipe Clamp Sensor,” Product Data Sheet 00813-0100-4952, Mar. 2016, pp. 1-16. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/067243, dated Feb. 27, 2015, 8 pages. |
First Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2019 for Chinese patent application No. 201710049532.8, 9 pages including English translation. |
Russian Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2019, for Russian Patent Application No. 20191022184, 14 pages including English translation. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201710049632.8 dated Nov. 4, 2019, 17 pages with English Translation. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 3029201 dated Nov. 18, 2019, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 17820891.4 dated Jan. 16, 2020, 9 pages. |
First Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2020 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-565387, 10 pages including English translation. |
Canadian Second Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2020 for Canadian Patent Application 3029201, 6 pages. |
Third Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2020 for Chinese Patent Application 201710049532.8, 17 pages including English Translation. |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 201827044928 dated Jan. 5, 2021, 5 pages. |
Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-565387 dated Mar. 2, 2021, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180003655 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |